DOCSLIB.ORG

Common Data Set 2019-2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Common Data Set 2019-2020 Common Data Set 2019-2020 A. General Information A0 Respondent Information (Not for Publication) A0 Name: Joachim Knop A0 Title: Director, Institutional Research and Planning A0 Office: The Office of Institutional Research & Planning A0 Mailing Address: 1918 F Street, N.W., Suite 400 A0 City/State/Zip/Country: Washington, D.C. 20052 USA A0 Phone: 202.994.6506 A0 Fax: 202.994.1985 A0 E-mail Address: A0 Are your responses to the CDS posted for reference on your institution's Web site? Yes No X A0 If yes, please provide the URL of the corresponding Web page: https://irp.gwu.edu/common-data-set A0A We invite you to indicate if there are items on the CDS for which you cannot use the requested analytic convention, cannot provide data for the cohort requested, whose methodology is unclear, or about which you have questions or comments in general. This information will not be published but will help the publishers further refine CDS items. A1 Address Information A1 Name of College/University: The George Washington University A1 Mailing Address: 1918 F Street, N.W. A1 City/State/Zip/Country: Washington, D.C. 20052 USA A1 Street Address (if different): A1 City/State/Zip/Country: A1 Main Phone Number: 202.994.1000 A1 WWW Home Page Address: http://www.gwu.edu A1 Admissions Phone Number: 202.994.6040 A1 Admissions Toll-Free Phone Number: 1.800.447.3765 A1 Admissions Office Mailing Address: 800 21st St NW Suite 100 A1 City/State/Zip/Country: Washington, D.C. 20052 USA A1 Admissions Fax Number: 202.994.0325 A1 Admissions E-mail Address: [email protected] A1 If there is a separate URL for your https://gwapplication.gwu.edu/login/login.cfm school’s online application, please specify: A1 If you have a mailing address other than the above to which applications should be sent, please provide: A2 Source of institutional control (Check only one): A2 Public A2 Private (nonprofit) X A2 Proprietary A3 Classify your undergraduate institution: A3 Coeducational college X A3 Men's college A3 Women's college A4 Academic year calendar: A4 Semester X A4 Quarter A4 Trimester A4 4-1-4 A4 Continuous A4 Differs by program (describe): CDS-A Page 1 Common Data Set 2019-2020 A4 Other (describe): A5 Degrees offered by your institution: A5 Certificate X A5 Diploma A5 Associate X A5 Transfer Associate A5 Terminal Associate X A5 Bachelor's X A5 Postbachelor's certificate X A5 Master's X A5 Post-master's certificate X A5 Doctoral degree X research/scholarship A5 Doctoral degree – X professional practice A5 Doctoral degree -- other A5 Doctoral degree -- other CDS-A Page 2 Common Data Set 2019-2020 B. ENROLLMENT AND PERSISTENCE B1 Institutional Enrollment - Men and Women Provide numbers of students for each of the following categories as of the institution's official fall reporting date or as of October 15, 2019. Note: Report students formerly designated as “first professional” in the graduate cells. Please see: https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/pdf/Reporting_Study_Abroad%20Students_5.31.17.pdf B1 FULL-TIME PART-TIME B1 Men Women Men Women B1 Undergraduates B1 Degree-seeking, first-time freshmen 984 1,625 6 4 B1 Other first-year, degree-seeking 146 225 76 120 B1 All other degree-seeking 3,035 4,993 393 424 B1 Total degree-seeking 4,165 6,843 475 548 B1 All other undergraduates enrolled in credit courses 33 61 79 280 B1 Total undergraduates 4,198 6,904 554 828 B1 Graduate B1 Degree-seeking, first-time B1 All other degree-seeking B1 All other graduates enrolled in credit courses B1 Total graduate 3322 4385 2850 4773 B1 Total all undergraduates 12,484 B1 Total all graduate 15,330 B1 GRAND TOTAL ALL STUDENTS 27,814 B2 Enrollment by Racial/Ethnic Category. Provide numbers of undergraduate students for each of the following categories as of the institution's official fall reporting date or as of October 15, 2019. Include international students only in the category "Nonresident aliens." Complete the "Total Undergraduates" column only if you cannot provide data for the first two columns. Report as your institution reports to IPEDS: persons who are Hispanic should be reported only on the Hispanic line, not under any race, and persons who are non-Hispanic multi-racial should be reported only under "Two or more races." B2 Degree-Seeking Total Degree-Seeking Undergraduates Undergraduates First-Time (include first-time (both degree- and First Year first-year) non-degree-seeking) B2 Nonresident aliens 376 1,416 1,503 B2 Hispanic/Latino 304 1,320 1,371 B2 Black or African American, non-Hispanic 182 964 1,026 B2 White, non-Hispanic 1,301 5,992 6,148 B2 American Indian or Alaska Native, non-Hispanic 1 6 8 B2 Asian, non-Hispanic 268 1,300 1,330 B2 Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, non- Hispanic 1 12 13 B2 Two or more races, non-Hispanic 108 488 505 B2 Race and/or ethnicity unknown 78 533 580 B2 TOTAL 2,619 12,031 12,484 Persistence B3 Number of degrees awarded from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019 B3 Certificate/diploma 380 B3 Associate degrees 197 B3 Bachelor's degrees 3021 B3 Postbachelor's certificates 527 B3 Master's degrees 4597 B3 Post-Master's certificates 191 B3 Doctoral degrees – research/scholarship 240 B3 Doctoral degrees – professional practice 834 B3 Doctoral degrees – other CDS-B Page 3 Common Data Set 2019-2020 Graduation Rates The items in this section correspond to data elements collected by the IPEDS Web-based Data Collection System’s Graduation Rate Survey (GRS). For complete instructions and definitions of data elements, see the IPEDS GRS Forms and Instructions for the 2019-20 Survey For Bachelor's or Equivalent Institutions In the following section for bachelor’s or equivalent programs, please disaggregate the Fall 2012 and Fall 2013 cohorts (formerly CDS B4-B11) into four groups: • Students who received a Federal Pell Grant* • Recipients of a subsidized Stafford Loan who did not receive a Pell Grant • Students who did not receive either a Pell Grant or a subsidized Stafford Loan • Total (all students, regardless of Pell Grant or subsidized loan status) *Students who received both a Federal Pell Grant and a subsidized Stafford Loan should be reported in the "Recipients of a Federal Pell Grant" column. For each graduation rate grid below, the numbers in the first three columns for Questions A-G should sum to the cohort total in the fourth column (formerly CDS B4-B11). Fall 2013 Cohort Recipients of a Students who Subsidized did not receive Recipients of Total (sum of 3 Stafford Loan either a Pell a Federal Pell columes to the who did not Grant or a Grant left) receive a Pell subsidized Grant Stafford Loan Formerly B4 A- Initital 2013 cohort of first-time, full-time bachelor's (or equivalent) degree seeking 335 548 1465 2348 undergraduate-students Formerly B- Of the initial 2013 cohort, how many did not B5 persist and did not graduate for the following reasons: deceased, permanently disabled, armed forces, foreign aid service of the federal 2 6 8 government, or official church missions; total allowable exclusions Formerly B6 C- Final 2013 cohort, after adjusting for allowable exclusions 335 546 1459 2340 Formerly B7 D - Of the initial 2013 cohort, how many completed the program in four years or 231 432 1106 1769 less (by Aug. 31, 2017) Formerly B8 E - Of the initial 2013 cohort, how many completed the program in more than four 22 25 76 123 years but in five years or less (after Aug. 31, 2017 and by Aug. 31, 2018) Formerly B9 F - Of the initial 2013 cohort, how many completed the program in more than five 2 4 25 31 years but in six years or less (after Aug. 31, 2018 and by Aug. 31, 2019) Formerly B10 G - Total graduating within six years (sum of lines D, E, and F) 255 461 1207 1923 CDS-B Page 4 Common Data Set 2019-2020 Formerly B11 H - Six-year graduation rate for 2013 cohort (G divided by C) 0.76119403 0.844322344 0.827278958 0.821794872 Fall 2012 Cohort Recipients of a Students who Subsidized did not receive Recipients of Total (sum of 3 Stafford Loan either a Pell a Federal Pell columes to the who did not Grant or a Grant left) receive a Pell subsidized Grant Stafford Loan Formerly B4 A- Initital 2012 cohort of first-time, full-time bachelor's (or equivalent) degree seeking 285 522 1564 2371 undergraduate-students Formerly B- Of the initial 2012 cohort, how many did not B5 persist and did not graduate for the following reasons: deceased, permanently disabled, armed forces, foreign aid service of the federal 0 0 12 12 government, or official church missions; total allowable exclusions Formerly B6 C- Final 2012 cohort, after adjusting for allowable exclusions 285 522 1552 2359 Formerly B7 D - Of the initial 2012 cohort, how many completed the program in four years or 187 399 1156 1742 less (by Aug. 31, 2016) Formerly E - Of the initial 2012 cohort, how many B8 completed the program in more than four years but in five years or less (after Aug. 30 24 87 141 31, 2016 and by Aug. 31, 2017) Formerly B9 F - Of the initial 2012 cohort, how many completed the program in more than five 5 12 36 53 years but in six years or less (after Aug. 31, 2017 and by Aug. 31, 2018) Formerly B10 G - Total graduating within six years (sum of lines D, E, and F) 222 435 1279 1936 Formerly B11 H - Six-year graduation rate for 2012 cohort (G divided by C) 0.778947368 0.833333333 0.824097938 0.820686732 For Two-Year Institutions Please provide data for the 2016 cohort if available.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Battles of Germantown: Public History and Preservation in America’S Most Historic Neighborhood During the Twentieth Century
    The Battles of Germantown: Public History and Preservation in America’s Most Historic Neighborhood During the Twentieth Century Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By David W. Young Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Steven Conn, Advisor Saul Cornell David Steigerwald Copyright by David W. Young 2009 Abstract This dissertation examines how public history and historic preservation have changed during the twentieth century by examining the Germantown neighborhood of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Founded in 1683, Germantown is one of America’s most historic neighborhoods, with resonant landmarks related to the nation’s political, military, industrial, and cultural history. Efforts to preserve the historic sites of the neighborhood have resulted in the presence of fourteen historic sites and house museums, including sites owned by the National Park Service, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and the City of Philadelphia. Germantown is also a neighborhood where many of the ills that came to beset many American cities in the twentieth century are easy to spot. The 2000 census showed that one quarter of its citizens live at or below the poverty line. Germantown High School recently made national headlines when students there attacked a popular teacher, causing severe injuries. Many businesses and landmark buildings now stand shuttered in community that no longer can draw on the manufacturing or retail economy it once did. Germantown’s twentieth century has seen remarkably creative approaches to contemporary problems using historic preservation at their core.
    [Show full text]
  • The George Washington University
    The George Washington University Degree Programmme Does your University accept the Yes. HKCEE grades are considered direct equivalents to GCSE HKCEE and HKALE for exams. The HKALE grades are equivalent to GCE A-level. admission to your University? What are the entry requirements HKALE grades A-C. for a student with HKCEE and HKCEE in a broad range of subjects – the majority should be grade HKALE qualifications entering A-B. your University? Do students with HKCEE and Students must take the SAT or ACT and have an official score report HKALE qualifications have to sit sent from the College Board to the George Washington University. an entrance examination to enter your University? Is there a language proficiency Students must submit an official TOEFL score (Test of English as a test that students with HKCEE Foreign Language) unless the student scores a 550 or higher on the and HKALE qualifications critical reading section of the SAT. wishing to enter your University must take? Is there a standard on an For TOEFL minimum requirements visit: international English scale that http://gwired.gwu.edu/adm/apply/international.html students with HKCEE and HKALE qualifications wishing to enter your University must reach? Are there any other tests that No. students with HKCEE and HKALE qualifications wishing to enter your University must take? When must they be taken? Is there an entry quota that No. applies to students with HKCEE and HKALE qualifications wishing to enter your University? Where can information be Up-to-date information can be found
    [Show full text]
  • From HFC's Director
    National Park Service HFCU.S. Department of the Interior onMEDIA May / June | 2008 Issue 23 Yellowstone National Park’s In This Issue “Roving Ranger” videocasts enable visitors to download interpretive content from Interpretive the Web to their own digital Techniques in device, and then play back 2 New Media the content during their park visit. New technology like this gives our audiences greater control over when, What New where, and how they receive Media Products interpretive information. 5 are Parks Using Learn more about new me- Today? dia products like this starting on page 5. (NPS Photo) New Employees and Staff News 6 at Harpers Ferry From HFC’s Director Center New media—digital and often web-based—off er the interpretation and education pro- HFC Products fessional many opportunities to deliver information to our many audiences. More than 11 Receive Awards ever before, these tools allow us to target our messages to very specifi c demographics and create a whole new palette of experiences for visitors. New Film Pre- Each of the “new media” technologies has its own content requirements, operational mieres at Home- regimes, and investment and life cycle costs. As a result, some are more successful in park 14 stead National environments than others. In this issue, we take a look at a few of the new technologies Monument that have been used in our parks and hear from experienced park professionals about the challenges, successes, and lessons learned as they have implemented new media products in their park. New Graphic 15 Identity Website Even though many of these exciting new media solutions are by design “user generated” Launched at the park site, Harpers Ferry Center looks forward to helping parks prepare their con- tent and create standards that benefi t the NPS system-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Exclusive Rulebookrulebook
    SARATOGA 1 The Turning Point of the American Revolution, 1777 EXCLUSIVEEXCLUSIVE RULEBOOKRULEBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Prepare for Play .................................................... 2 7. Special Scenario Rules ......................................... 6 2. How to Win ........................................................... 2 8. Historical Scenario, “Freeman’s Farm” ................ 7 3. Special Rules ........................................................ 3 9. Scenario Victory Conditions ................................. 7 4. Variants ................................................................ 4 10. Special Scenario Rules ......................................... 8 5. Saratoga “Next Day” Scenario Setup ................... 4 Historical Article: Saratoga .......................................... 9 6. Scenario Victory Conditions ................................. 5 Counter scans ............................................................... 15 GMT Games, LLC Ammo Depletion Log .................................................. 16 P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 www.GMTGames.com © 2006 and 2017 GMT Games, LLC 3rd Edition 2 SARATOGA 1.4 Scenario Length Introduction The scenario begins on Turn 1, and ends on Turn 12, unless ei- This, the Third Edition of Saratoga, contains significant differ- ther side achieves a Decisive or Substantial victory before then. ences from previous editions including rules changes or modifi- cations, changes in terrain, and new or re-named units. Terrain 1.5. Player Order and Initiative and
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying Visitor Impact and Material Degradation at George Washington's Mount Vernon Laurel Lynne Bartlett Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2013 Quantifying Visitor Impact and Material Degradation at George Washington's Mount Vernon Laurel Lynne Bartlett Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Bartlett, Laurel Lynne, "Quantifying Visitor Impact and Material Degradation at George Washington's Mount Vernon" (2013). All Theses. 1599. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1599 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. QUANTIFYING VISITOR IMPACT AND MATERIAL DEGRADATION AT GEORGE WASHINGTON’S MOUNT VERNON A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Schools of Clemson University and the College of Charleston In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Historic Preservation by Laurel Lynne Bartlett May 2013 Accepted by: Dr. Carter L. Hudgins, Committee Chair Frances Ford Ralph Muldrow Elizabeth Ryan ABSTRACT Over one million visitors per year traverse the visitor path through George Washington’s home at Mount Vernon. Increased visitation has tested the limits of the architectural materials and created the single most threatening source of degradation. While the history of Mount Vernon is dotted with attempts to mitigate damage caused by visitors, scientific analysis of the dynamic impacts to the historic fabric is needed to preserve the integrity of the preeminent national house museum. The following thesis presents a holistic analysis of visitor impact and material degradation occurring at Mount Vernon.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyndon Baines Johnson Memorial Grove on the Potomac Washington, D
    10-900 OHB Mo. 1U-, . 10-90) RECEIVED 2289 •»i .I " United States Department of the Interior National Park Service JUN12 NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM Lyndon Baines Johnson Memorial Grove on the Potomac Washington, D. C. (Page 1) This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How tc Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, entet *N/A" for ©not applicable/ For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories anc subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use * typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Lyndon Baines Johnson Memorial Grove on the Potomac_ other names/site number _____________________________________ 2. Location street & number Lady Bird Johnson Park________ not for publication city or town Columbia Island. Washington. D. C. vicinity X. state __________________ code county code zip code _______ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X_ nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register o; Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property *»y meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria I recommend that this property be considered significant X nationally _ statewide _ locally.
    [Show full text]
  • NCPC Final Report
    NCPC Final Report for CONSTRUCT NEW COMFORT STATION AT U.S. MARINE CORPS WAR MEMORIAL GEORGE WASHINGTON MEMORIAL PARKWAY Arlington, Virginia GWMP 231335 Prepared for: United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Denver Service Center 12795 W. Alameda Parkway Denver, Colorado 80225 Prepared by: EYP Architecture & Engineering 1000 Potomac Street, NW Washington, DC 20007 July 24, 2018 Arlington Ridge Park George Washington Memorial Parkway US Marine Corps War Memorial Comfort Station Project NCPC Concept Report 2/47 Arlington Ridge Park George Washington Memorial Parkway US Marine Corps War Memorial Comfort Station Project NCPC Concept Report Table of Contents Page Project Overview…………………………………………………………………………6 Project Background and Purpose…………………………………………………..…6 Political History……………………………………………………………………....7 Description of Project Area…………………………………………………………….7 Arlington Ridge Park………………………………………………………...……….7 Memorial Grounds……………………………………………………………………7 Description of Proposed Development and Alternatives…………………………..….8 Proposed Development……………………………………………………………….8 Project Design Option 1………………………………………………………….….10 Project Design Option 2……………………………………………………………..13 Final Option Selection……………………………….……………………………....15 Master Plan Alignment………………………………………………………………...16 Schedule…………………………………………………………………………………16 Project Cost Estimate………………………………………………….……………….17 Outreach and Coordination………………………………….……………………….18 Updates to Previous Submissions…………………..………………………………...21 Commission Comment from Prior Review……………………………………………21
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland in the American Revolution
    382-MD BKLT COVER fin:382-MD BKLT COVER 2/13/09 2:55 PM Page c-4 Maryland in the Ame rican Re volution An Exhibition by The Society of the Cincinnati Maryland in the Ame rican Re volution An Exhibition by The Society of the Cincinnati Anderson House Wash ingt on, D .C. February 27 – September 5, 2009 his catalogue has been produced in conjunction with the exhibition Maryland in the American Revolution on display fTrom February 27 to September 5, 2009, at Anderson House, the headquarters, library, and museum of The Society of the Cincinnati in Washington, D.C. The exhibition is the eleventh in a series focusing on the contributions to the e do most Solemnly pledge American Revolution made by the original thirteen states ourselves to Each Other and France. W & to our Country, and Engage Generous support for this exhibition and catalogue was provided by the Society of the Cincinnati of Maryland. ourselves by Every Thing held Sacred among Mankind to Also available: Massachusetts in the American Revolution: perform the Same at the Risque “Let It Begin Here” (1997) of our Lives and fortunes. New York in the American Revolution (1998) New Jersey in the American Revolution (1999) — Bush River Declaration Rhode Island in the American Revolution (2000) by the Committee of Observation, Connecticut in the American Revolution (2001) Delaware in the American Revolution (2002) Harford County, Maryland Georgia in the American Revolution (2003) March 22, 1775 South Carolina in the American Revolution (2004) Pennsylvania in the American Revolution (2005) North Carolina in the American Revolution (2006) Text by Emily L.
    [Show full text]
  • PA Project Part 4
    CHRONOLOGY OF THE MARCH THROUGH PENNSYLVANIA 30 August 1781 The Land Route of Generals George Washington and the comte de Rochambeau to Philadelphia in September 1781 (Route Number 1): In his diary, Washington wrote 30th. I set out myself for Philadelphia to arrange matters there - provide Vessels & hasten the transportation of the Ordnance Stores, &ca. - directing before I set out, the secd. York Regiment (which had not all arrived from Albany before we left Kings ferry) to follow with the Boats- -Intrenching Tools &ca. the French Rear to Trenton. 31st. Arrived at Philadelphia to dinner and immediately hastened up all the Vessels that could be procured--but finding them inadequate to the purpose of transporting both Troops & Stores, Count de Rochambeau & myself concluded it would be best to let the Troops March by land to the head of Elk, & gave directions accordingly to all but the 2d. York Regiment which was ordered (with its baggage) to come down in the Batteaux they had in charge to Christiana bridge.392 This diary entry seems proof that Washington and Rochambeau arrived in Philadelphia on 31 August, but both Washington's private secretary Jonathan Trumbull and Baron Closen give 30 August as the date of arrival, a date that is also reported by the Philadelphia Packet in its edition for 2 September. Since Washington and Rochambeau had crossed the Delaware in the morning of 30 August, an arrival date in Philadelphia of 31 August seems unlikely given the relatively short distance, 30 miles, which the generals had to travel to get to Philadelphia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle for Liberty the Outcome of a Battle? Why Was This Period of the War So Difficult for the 5
    DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=TX-A SECTION 3 The Struggle for TEKS 2A, 4B, 4C, 10C, 22B, 25B Liberty What You Will Learn… If YOU were there... Main Ideas You are a serving maid at an inn in New York City. British soldiers 1. Many Americans supported often stop at the inn for a meal. You sometimes overhear their con- the war effort. 2. The Patriots both won and versations, though they don’t notice you. Now a Patriot leader has lost battles during the years asked you to bring him any information you hear. You want to help 1775–1777. 3. France and Spain helped the the Patriot cause but wonder what will happen if you are caught Patriots fight the British. spying. 4. The winter at Valley Forge tested the strength of Patriot Would you agree to spy for the Patriots? troops. 5. The war continued at sea and in the West. BUILDING BACKGROUND Many colonists struggled for the Patriot The Big Idea cause. Men, women, and children all made important contributions. Patriot forces faced many obstacles in the war against They fought, kept farms and shops running, and provided food and Britain. supplies. In spite of their efforts, winning the war was a great chal- lenge. Key Terms and People mercenaries, p. 128 Battle of Trenton, p. 129 Supporting the War Effort Battle of Saratoga, p. 130 George Washington’s chief task as the Continental Army’s com- Marquis de Lafayette, p. 131 mander in chief was to raise troops.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Porm 10-900 OMfl Mo. f 024-00 jj <R*v 9-M) United States Department of the interior National Park Service -•" 141390 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property ___ ________________ ___ ___ ___ historic name Wetzel, Margaret/ House__________________^ other names/site number Alumni House, The George Washington University 2. Location street & number 714 21st Street, N.W. "I I not for publication N/A~ city, town Washington I 1 vicinity N/A state District of code DC county District of code 001 zip code 20052 Columbia Columbia 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property fx| private [x] building(s) Contributing Noncontributing I I public-local I I district 1 ____buildings I 1 public-State Osite ____ _____ sites I I public-Federal C~] structure _______ ______ structures I I object ____ ____ objects _1__ ____ Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously IN / £\ listed in the National Register _Q_______ 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Vernon Avenue Business Area Plan
    The Mount Vernon Avenue Business Area Plan The City of Alexandria, Virginia Department of Planning and Zoning ADOPTED MAY 2005 Acknowledgements City Council Alice Kale, Watercolors and Drawings, Mayor William D. Euille 703-683-3988, [email protected], copyright 2003. Vice Mayor Redella S. Pepper Councilman Ludwig P. Gaines Mt. Vernon Avenue Work Group Councilman K. Rob Krupicka Michael Babin Bill Hendrickson Councilman Andrew H. MacDonald, PHD Lee Blount Bob Larson Councilman Paul C. Smedberg Wendy Campbell Joe Lavigne Councilwoman Joyce Woodson Marilyn Doherty Marlin Lord Harry M. Falconer, Jr. Pat Miller Planning Commission Mary Ellis Fannon Kevin Reilly Chair Eric R.Wagner David Fromm Gayle Reuter Vice Chair Richard Leibach Joan Gaskins Stephanie Sample Donna Fossum Donal Goff Robert Steele John Komoroske Tara Hardiman Lois Walker H. Stewart Dunn, Jr. Sarah Haut Tom Welsh J. Lawrence Robinson Jesse Jennings Interdepartmental Team City Manager’s Office Alexandria Transit Company (DASH) James K. Hartmann, City Manager Sandy Modell Philip Sunderland, Former City Manager Al Himes Department of Planning and Zoning Fire Department, Code Enforcement Eileen Fogarty, Director Gary Mesaris, Fire Chief Kimberley Fogle, Chief, Neighborhood Planning and Arthur Dahlberg, Director Community Development Robert Rodriguez Kathleen Beeton, Urban Planner Eric Forman, Urban Planner General Services Consultant Team Peter Geiling EDAW Office of Historic Alexandria Paul Moyer, AICP Pamela Cressey Natalie Topa The Oderma� Group Office of Housing Robert A. Oderma�, FAIA Mildrilyn Davis, Director Robert Eiffert Ehrenkrantz, Eckstut and Kuhn Architects Ma�hew J. Bell, AIA Human Services Jeff A. Evans Colby Hatch Kimley-Horn Associates, Inc, Recreation, Parks and Cultural Affairs Edward Y.
    [Show full text]