DOCSLIB.ORG

Harris Mccormack Architects Sconsborough Hill Farm, Knossington

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Harris Mccormack Architects Sconsborough Hill Farm, Knossington Harris McCormack Architects Sconsborough Hill Farm, Knossington Interpretative Desk Study May 2020 35-37 High Street, Barrow-upon-Soar, Loughborough, LE12 8PY Tel: 01509 410372 Email: [email protected] G&J Geoenvironmental Consultants Ltd Learn, Aspire, Achieve, Deliver Sconsborough Hill Farm, Knossington Interpretative Desk Study Report Title Sconsborough Hill Farm, Site Address Sconsborough Hill Farm, Knossington - Somerby Road, Knossington, Interpretative Desk Study Leicestershire, LE15 8LY Author G&J Geoenvironmental Contamination / Contamination Consultants Ltd Geotechnical Work Stage Desk Study Report Date May 2020 Brief Description of the Review of desk top information to develop a conceptual model in order to establish Report Contents the geo-environmental site setting, identify any potential Source-Pathway-Receptor pollutant linkages and associated environmental issues, and to provide recommendations for any further works (as required). i Harris McCormack Architects Interpretative Desk Study GJ203 May 2020 Sconsborough Hill Farm, Knossington Interpretative Desk Study Document Control Project: Sconsborough Hill Farm, Knossington – Interpretative Desk Study Client: Harris McCormack Architects Job Number: GJ203 File Origin: N:\Projects\GJ203 Sconsborough Hill Farm, Knossington\Reports\GJ203-DTS-V1.docx Document Checking: Prepared by: Andrew Bedford Signed: Geoenvironmental Consultant Checked and Chris Hepworth Signed: verified by: Managing Director Issued by Chris Hepworth Signed: Managing Director Issue Date Status 1 May 2020 V1 FINAL 2 3 ii Harris McCormack Architects Interpretative Desk Study GJ203 May 2020 Sconsborough Hill Farm, Knossington Interpretative Desk Study Contents Page 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Terms and Conditions .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Sources of information ......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Policy Context – Land Contamination .................................................................................... 2 2.0 Site Setting ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Site Location ....................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Site Description ................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Surrounding Land Use ......................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Potential Sources of Contamination ....................................................................................... 6 2.5 Sensitive Land Use .............................................................................................................. 6 2.6 Archaeology and National Monuments ................................................................................... 6 2.7 Proposed Development ........................................................................................................ 7 3.0 Ground Conditions ............................................................................................................. 8 3.1 Geology .............................................................................................................................. 8 3.2 Mining and Extraction .......................................................................................................... 8 3.3 Radon ................................................................................................................................ 8 3.4 Ground Stability .................................................................................................................. 8 3.5 Made Ground and Landfills ................................................................................................... 9 3.6 Hydrogeology ..................................................................................................................... 9 4.0 Hydrology ........................................................................................................................ 10 4.1 Watercourses .................................................................................................................... 10 4.2 Flood Risk ......................................................................................................................... 10 4.3 Water Quality .................................................................................................................... 10 4.4 Site Drainage .................................................................................................................... 10 5.0 Site History ...................................................................................................................... 11 5.1 Historical Mapping ............................................................................................................. 11 5.2 Summary of Site History .................................................................................................... 12 5.3 Previous Investigations ...................................................................................................... 12 6.0 Conceptual Site Model ..................................................................................................... 13 iii Harris McCormack Architects Interpretative Desk Study GJ203 May 2020 Sconsborough Hill Farm, Knossington Interpretative Desk Study 6.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 13 6.2 Hazard Identification ......................................................................................................... 14 6.3 Preliminary Risk Assessment .............................................................................................. 15 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................ 18 7.1 Preliminary Risk Assessment .............................................................................................. 18 7.2 Future Work Requirements................................................................................................. 18 APPENDIX CONTENTS Appendix A Site Photographs Appendix B Groundsure Report Appendix C Historical Maps iv Harris McCormack Architects Interpretative Desk Study GJ203 May 2020 Sconsborough Hill Farm, Knossington Interpretative Desk Study 1.0 Introduction G&J Geoenvironmental Consultants Ltd (G&J) was commissioned by Harris McCormack Architects to carry out an Interpretative Desk Study for a site located at Sconsborough Hill Farm, Knossington, Oakham. The purpose of this report is to collate and interpret information pertaining to the site from a desk-based review of available data. The scope of the study is as follows: • To determine the environmental setting of the site and its surroundings in terms of location, topography, ground conditions and land use; • To discuss the geology, hydrogeology and hydrology at, and in the vicinity of, the site; • To determine the site history and that of the surrounding area; • To assess potential contamination issues pertaining to the site with consideration of the site’s current and historic use; • To develop an initial Conceptual Site Model (CSM) linking sources of potential contamination with pathways and receptors; • To produce a Preliminary Risk Assessment for contamination in accordance with CLR11 – Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination; • To provide recommendations for further work and / or mitigation measures; and • To support any planning applications for development of the site. 1.1 Terms and Conditions This report has been prepared for Harris McCormack Architects in consideration of the current use of the site and a future residential development. Much of the environmental information relates to the site in its present state and should not be used in a different context without reference to G&J. 1.2 Sources of information The following sections describe the environmental setting of the site, the site history and the anticipated ground conditions based on information taken from a variety of sources, including; • Site Inspection; • Current maps and plans; 1 Harris McCormack Architects Interpretative Desk Study GJ203 May 2020 Sconsborough Hill Farm, Knossington Interpretative Desk Study • Site photographs (Appendix A); • Geological maps and records; • Environmental data (Groundsure) reports (Appendix B); • Historical maps (Appendix C); • Website of relevant authorities and organisations such as The British Geological Survey, the Environment Agency, Natural England and Historic England Much of the information reviewed as part of this assessment is contained within the historical maps and data reports obtained from Groundsure. Only where information is considered significant and relevant in the context of the objectives of the survey has it been included in our assessment. The full Groundsure reports are referenced below: • 14 May 2020, Groundsure Enviro+Geo insight (GS-6763729); • 14 May 2020, Groundsure Mapinsight (GS-6763728_largescale); • 14 May 2020, Groundsure Mapinsight (GS-6763728_smallscale). Although
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tilton on the Hill Settlement Profile Introduction
    Tilton on the Hill Settlement Profile Introduction General Location: Tilton on the Hill (hereby referred to as Tilton), lies on the B6047 that connects Market Harborough (14 miles away) to Melton Mowbray (11 miles away). The village is in the north-east of Harborough District, sitting only 2 miles north of the A47. Tilton parish is one of the largest in the District and embraces numerous past and current settlements such as Halstead, Whatborough and Marefield. The settlement neighbours Skeffington to the south, Billesdon, Cold Newton and Lowesby to the west, Marefield and Owsten and Newbold to the north, with Loddington, Launde and Withcote lying to the east. Beyond its Harborough District neighbours, the parish is in close proximity to Melton Borough and Rutland County. The village centre is a conservation area (with the church, pub and Main Street constituting its centre) and the parish contains 5 scheduled ancient monuments. Such a rich history can be explained by Tilton’s location, at the crossroads of two ancient, pre-Roman pathways that date back to the Bronze Age. Furthermore, the village was recognised not only as ‘The Best Village in Leicestershire’ in the Calor Village of the Year Awards 2009, but also as the ‘Sustainability Village of the Year’ for the Midlands in the same year. An achievement that can be considered the fruits of ‘Tilton Green’s’ labour – a community centred on improving Tilton’s environmental record (discussed in Tilton Parish Council section). Lastly, Tilton is among one of the highest places in east Leicestershire, standing at 219 metres above sea level near the peak of the High Leicestershire area.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology in Leicestershire and Rutland 2002 125
    ARCHAEOLOGY IN LEICESTERSHIRE AND RUTLAND 2002 125 1 2 Archaeology in Leicestershire and 3 4 5 Rutland 2002 6 7 Edited by Richard Buckley and Sam George 8 9 10 1 2 Note. Archaeological watching briefs which have produced no significant archaeological features or finds are listed at the end of the relevant sections below. 3 In each case, the parish/site name is followed by the name of the individual or 4 organisation that undertook the fieldwork. For abbreviations, please see above, 5 p.iv. Some entries relate to fieldwork undertaken before 2002, but not previously 6 reported. 7 8 9 10 LEICESTER 1 2 ABBEY 3 4 Leicester Abbey (SK 584 060) Steve Jones 5 In July and August 2002 University of Leicester Archaeological Services (ULAS) under- 6 took a third training excavation at the site of Leicester Abbey for second-year students 7 of the School of Archaeology and Ancient History. Following on from the previous trial 8 excavations of 2000 and 2001 (TLAHS 75, 129–130; TLAHS 76, 81–85), further 9 trenches were opened up on the south side of Cavendish House to provide more clarifi- 10 cation of the plan and structure of the medieval gatehouse and subsequent mansion 1 and farmhouse phases. Four small trenches were also positioned at the north-east and 2 north-west corners of the postulated medieval gatehouse with the aim of locating the 3 foundations of polygonal corner towers thought to exist at these points (TLAHS 76, 4 fig.1, p.82). Although no such evidence was revealed, the work did provide indications 5 of the alignment of the medieval halt way walls flanking the approach to the gatehouse 6 from the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Vendor Name Corporate Subjective Description Invoice Payment
    Vendor Name Corporate Subjective Description Invoice Payment AmountPayment Date Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Other Local Authorities 1413.96 16/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 548.7 07/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 552.96 07/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 563.4 23/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 577.2 23/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 621 23/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 648 23/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 696 23/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 710.4 07/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 748.2 23/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 751.2 07/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 772.2 07/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 792 23/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 828 07/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 864 07/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 960 07/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 1006.2 23/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 1032 07/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 1056 07/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 1078.2 23/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 1341.6 07/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Home to Sch Trans - Buses 1437.6 07/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Recharge of Pooled Transp Cost 1140 07/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Recharge of Pooled Transp Cost 1168.51 07/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd Recharge of Pooled Transp Cost 1257.6 07/01/2015 Murphys Taxis Ltd S.E.N.
    [Show full text]
  • English Hundred-Names
    l LUNDS UNIVERSITETS ARSSKRIFT. N. F. Avd. 1. Bd 30. Nr 1. ,~ ,j .11 . i ~ .l i THE jl; ENGLISH HUNDRED-NAMES BY oL 0 f S. AND ER SON , LUND PHINTED BY HAKAN DHLSSON I 934 The English Hundred-Names xvn It does not fall within the scope of the present study to enter on the details of the theories advanced; there are points that are still controversial, and some aspects of the question may repay further study. It is hoped that the etymological investigation of the hundred-names undertaken in the following pages will, Introduction. when completed, furnish a starting-point for the discussion of some of the problems connected with the origin of the hundred. 1. Scope and Aim. Terminology Discussed. The following chapters will be devoted to the discussion of some The local divisions known as hundreds though now practi­ aspects of the system as actually in existence, which have some cally obsolete played an important part in judicial administration bearing on the questions discussed in the etymological part, and in the Middle Ages. The hundredal system as a wbole is first to some general remarks on hundred-names and the like as shown in detail in Domesday - with the exception of some embodied in the material now collected. counties and smaller areas -- but is known to have existed about THE HUNDRED. a hundred and fifty years earlier. The hundred is mentioned in the laws of Edmund (940-6),' but no earlier evidence for its The hundred, it is generally admitted, is in theory at least a existence has been found.
    [Show full text]
  • Langham Neighbourhood Plan 2016-2036
    ANGHA NEIGHBOURHOO AN CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2 (i) Legislation 3 (ii) Langham Neighbourhood Plan 4 (iii) Langham Past and Present 7 2. COMMUNITY VISIONS & OBJECTIVES 11 HR Housing and Renewal 12 PSS Public Safety and Services 12 CH Cultural Heritage 13 NE Natural Environment 13 ED Education and Development 13 CE Community and Economy 13 3. KEY ISSUES 14 4. HOUSING & RENEWAL 16 HR1 Demographics and Housing 17 HR2 Important Green Spaces 18 HR3 Land Allocation 21 HR4 Housing Design and Layout 25 HR5 Developer/Community Collaboration 28 5. PUBLIC SAFETY AND SERVICES 30 PSS1 Public Safety - Traffic A606 31 PSS2 Public Safety - Traffic Within the Village 31 PSS3 Public Services - Public Transport 34 PSS4 Public Services - Communication Technology 35 PSS5 Public Services – Essential Utility Provision 35 6. CULTURAL HERITAGE 36 CH1 Village Conservation Status 37 CH2 Sites of Historical Importance 37 CH3 Ancient Parish Boundary 38 7. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 39 NE1 Rights of Way 40 NE2 Flooding 42 NE3 Green Spaces 43 NE4 Biodiversity 45 NE5 Renewable Energy 46 8. EDUCATION & DEVELOPMENT 48 ED1 Primary and Pre-school Provision 49 ED2 Secondary, Post 16 Education 51 ED3 Activities & Sport 52 9. COMMUNITY & ECONOMY 54 CE1 Community Needs – Shop & Post Office 55 CE2 Leisure and Culture 56 CE3 Economy 58 CE4 Health and Wellbeing 58 CE5 Crime and Security 59 CE6 Communication 59 Final Submission 10. DESIGN 61 D1 Character of Landscape 62 D2 Settlement Pattern & Character 64 D3 Parish Architecture 65 D4 Highways & Traffic 72 D5 Footpaths 73 11. Summary of Policies 75 12. Monitoring, Evaluation & Review 80 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 82 – 1988
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE LEICESTER LITERARY & PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY Tower Karst in Southern China Nuclear Test Verification East Midlands Airport S. C. Mason Dartington Chemistry and Society Lower Lias at Catthorpe Volume 82 August 1988 ISSN 0141 - 3511 TRANSACTIONS OF THE LEICESTER LITERARY AND PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 82 August 1988 CONTENTS THE SCIENCE OF VERIFICATION 1 Presidential Address by M.A. Khan DARTINGTON - A UTOPIAN COMMUNITY 3 D. Davis THE CONCEPTION AND OPERATION OF THE EAST MIDLANDS AIRPORT 7 E. Dyer MOLECULES AND ME - CHEMISTRY AND SOCIETY 9 R. Malpas THE LAST OF THE AMATEURS; S. C. MASON, CBE, DIRECTOR OF 15 EDUCATION FOR LEICESTERSHIRE, 1947-71 D.K. Jones THE TOWER KARST OF SOUTHERN CHINA 1 7 A.C. Waltham THE LOWER LIAS AT CATTHORPE, SOUTH LEICESTERSHIRE 21 D.M. Blake and R.G. Clements PRESIDENT'S REPORT, 1987-88 27 PROGRAMME FOR 146th SESSION 28 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE GEOLOGY SECTION 29 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE NATURAL HISTORY SECTION 30 MEMBERSHIP LIST 1987-88 33 Cover picture: Tower karst on the Li River, Guangxi, China. © Copyright: The Leicester Literary and Philosophical Sodety, 1988 Published by the Leicester Lit,erary and Philosophical Society, c/o Leicestershire Museums Service, 96 New Walk, Leicester LE1 6TD Transactions of the Leicester Literary & Philosophical Society Volume 82, 1988 THE SCIENCE OF VERIFICATION Presidential Address by Dr M, A, Khan delivered on 5th October 1987 The "verification" of the title refers to In 1963, the Limited Test Ban Treaty that of a Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (NTBT), (LTBT) was signed by 120 nations (but one of the most urgent and difficult excluding France) prohibiting nuclear diplomatic issues of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Rutland County Council Highways & Transport Working Group Executive
    Rutland County Council Highways & Transport Working Group Executive Meeting Room, Catmose, Oakham 11th December 2018, 13:00 MEETING NOTES & ACTIONS Attendees Cllr Lucy Stephenson, RCC Portfolio Holder (Chair) Cllr Oliver Hemsley, RCC Leader of the Council Steve Ingram, RCC Strategic Director for Places Dave Pye, RCC Senior Transport Manager Neil Tomlinson, RCC Senior Highways Manager Heather Caldicott, RCC Transport Policy Officer Robyn Green, RCC Highways Engineer James Von Der Voelsungen, RCC Parking Services Manager Graham Compton, Leicestershire Police 1. Welcome and Introductions LS 2. Confirmation of Minutes of the previous meeting LS The group confirmed minutes of the previous meeting as an accurate record of the matters discussed. 3. Declaration of Interest LS In relation to this Agenda, Councillor Stephenson declared an interest in respect of items affecting Braunston, Councillor Hemsley declared an interest in respect of items affecting Langham. 4. Highways and Traffic Schemes for consideration NT a. ITCP/2016/11 (17-05-10I) – Seaton Road, Barrowden A request was received for the introduction of road humps. The Feasibility Study highlighted the lack of suitable street lighting in the area. To introduce speed humps, there is a requirement for a series of street lights adjacent to any humps at the entry point, which would be cost prohibitive. The Officer recommendation is to improve the gateway features further by providing red high friction surfacing with a 30mph roundel to reduce speeds. Decision: Officer recommendation agreed, along with a review on success, with feedback requested from the initiators. Funding via Integrated Transport Grant. b. ITCP/2016/12 (17-05-10H) - Knossington Road, Braunston Proposal to extend an existing traffic calming scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Watch
    WATCH WORD For Leicester & Leicestershire Newsletter of CITY & COUNTY NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH – (LEICESTER & LEICESTERSHIRE) Working in SUPPORT of LEICESTERSHIRE POLICE. Charity No. 1072275 Issue 47/2016 The City & County Neighbourhood Watch is here to represent the concerns of members and their families. We operate entirely outside the police chain of command, so we can always promise an independent and confidential service Working in SUPPORT of LEICESTERSHIRE POLICE CITY & COUNTY NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH (LEICESTER & LEICESTERSHIRE) SAVE THE DATE! - THURSDAY 7TH SEPTEMBER 2017 - 7.30pm CITY & COUNTY NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH MEMBERS YEARLY MEETING ST THOMAS MORE CHURCH HALL Have you visited City and County Neighbourhood Watch (Leicester & Leicestershire) Website recently? www.neighbourhoodwatchleicester.net Keep up to date with the latest news: Number of articles (as at 28 November 2016) LOCAL NEWS – Blaby District: 92 – Charnwood Borough: 229 – Harborough District: 168 - Hinckley & Bosworth Borough: 207 - Leicester City: 1,019 – Leicestershire County: 225 – Melton Borough: 99 – North West Leicestershire District: 255 – Oadby & Wigston Borough: 110 – Rutland County: 19 EAST MIDLANDS NEWS – Derbyshire: 2,324 – Lincolnshire: 978 – Northamptonshire: 1,403 – Nottinghamshire: 801 NATIONAL CRIME AGENCY - 197 CITY & COUNTY NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH CARD DEFENDERS – Update City and County Neighbourhood Watch Association (Leicester & Leicestershire) (CCNWA) have received a substantial number of requests for Card Defenders from residents in Burbage and surrounding areas, who are not subscribing members of CCNWA. This is a result of Burbage Neighbourhood Watch, which is nothing to do with CCNWA, mistakenly submitting an item from a CCNWA Newsletter, to the ‘Local Rock’ publication. TO BE CLEAR: CARD DEFENDERS ARE ONLY AVAILABLE TO SUBSCRIBING MEMBERS OF CCNWA, ALTHOUGH WE ARE OUT OF STOCK AT THIS TIME.
    [Show full text]
  • Meetings 2006 & 2007
    WORTHINGTON 17th-CENTURY PROJECT 1 September 2006 PLANS FOR THE 2006 AND 2007 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETINGS The inaugural meeting of the society was held on 24 November 2005 at Wigan, Lancashire, England. Six members were present and a further eight members contributed to the outcome by post. The first Project year will end on 30 September 2006, so it is time that plans are drawn up for the 2006 annual general meeting. The main purpose of this paper is to suggest options for location and date of the meeting, and its agenda, and to seek members’ views. Final plans can then be made and announced. It is proposed that, in future, the locations and dates of meetings should be agreed to well in advance so that members and their families have time to make their plans in a broader context. For that reason, this paper also considers location and date of the 2007 annual general meeting in the hope that agreement can be reached at the 2006 meeting. Location of the meetings It is suggested that the principal object in choosing a location for the meeting should be to enable the greatest number of members to attend. Second only to that object should be an attempt to vary the location to reflect the truly international nature of the society. The countries of residence of the 23 present members are: Australia 2 England 9 New Zealand 1 South Africa 1 Spain 1 USA 9 Thus, it would be reasonable to consider the meetings being held in USA or in England. The two maps which follow show the residential locations of the nine American and nine English members.
    [Show full text]
  • RUTLAND. [KELLY's Oakham Has No Incorporation, and Is Under the Juris­ Acres; but Under the "Local Government Act, 1894,''' Diction of the County Magistrates
    392 OAKHAM. RUTLAND. [KELLY'S Oakham has no incorporation, and is under the juris­ acres; but under the "Local Government Act, 1894,''' diction of the county magistrates. Courts-Ieet are held the parish of Deanshold with Barleythorpe was divided; annually by the lord of the manor of Lordshold, George the latter is now a separate parish, and! Deanshold and 'Henry Finch esq. M.P. of Burley-on-the-Hill, and trien­ Lordshold f\Jrm the parish of Oakham. The area of nially for the manor of Deanshold with Barleythorpe, of Oakham is 2,047 acres; assessable value, £12,3.t;3. The which the Dean and Chapter of Westminster are lords. popUlation of Oakham Deanshold with Barleythorpe in The chief landowners are the Earl of Gainsborough, 1891 was 1,146 and of Oakham Lordshold 2,396, including the Earl of Ancaster P. C. the Right Hon. Gerard J ames 65 officers and inmates in the workhouse. Noel P.C. the Earl of Lunsdale and George Henry Finch Gunthorpe is a township, 2 miles south; area, 476 esq. M.P. acres; assessable value, £1,328; the population in IB9I The area of Oakham Lordshold was formerly 2,010 was 24. acres; Oakham Deanshold with Barleythorpe, 1,235 Parish Clerk, George Faulks. OFFICIAL ESTABLISHMENTS, LOCAL INSTlTUTIO NS, &c. Post, M. O. &I T. 0., T. M. 0., Express Delivery, Oakham Fire Brigade, Mill street, William Ellicott, capt. ; Parcel Post,. S. B. & Annuitv & Insurance Office, William Munton, sub-capt. &; 10 men High street.--Henry George Huckman, postmaster. Oakham Institute, High street, G. H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leicestershire Archjeological and Historical Society 1961-2
    THE LEICESTERSHIRE ARCHJEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL SOCIETY 1961-2 President Lieut.-Col. Sir Robert Martin, C.M.G., D.L., T .D., LLD., M.A. (Deceased 13 1une 1961) Colin D. B. Ellis, Esq., C.B.E., M.C., M .A., F.S.A. (Elected 29 September 1961) * Vice-Presidents Kathleen, Duchess of Rutland The Hon. Lady Martin The Right Revd. The Lord Bishop of Leicester, D.D. The High Sheriff of Leicestershire The Right Worshipful The Lord Mayor of Leicester The Very Revd. H. A. Jones,, B.Sc., Dean of Manchester Albert Herbert, Esq., F.R.I.B.A., F.S.A. Victor Po:::hin, Esq., C.B.E., M.A., D.L., J.P. A. Bernard Clarke, Esq. Levi Fox, Esq., M.A., F.S.A. W. G. Hoskins, Esq., M.A., Ph.D. Miss K. M. Kenyon, C.B.E., M.A., D.Lit., F.B.A., F.S.A. * Officers Hon. Secretary: David T-D. Clarke, Esq., M.A., F.M.A. Hon. Treasurer: C. L. Wykes, Esq., F.C.A. Hon. Auditor: Lieut.-Col. G. L. Aspell, T.D., D.L., F.C.A. Hon. Editor : Professor J. Simmons, M .A., F.R.Hist.S., F.R.S.L. Hon. Librarian: G. H. Martin, Esq., M.A., D.Phil., F.R.Hist.S. * Trustees of the Leicestershire Archawlogical and Historical Society J. E. Brownlow, Esq. Colin D. B. Ellis, Esq., C.B.E., M.C., M.A., F.S.A. Albert Herbert, Esq., F .R.I.B.A., F.S.A. J. N. Pickard, Esq., J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2018, East Midlands
    East Midlands Register 2018 HERITAGE AT RISK 2018 / EAST MIDLANDS Contents The Register III Nottingham, City of (UA) 66 Content and criteria III Nottinghamshire 68 Criteria for inclusion on the Register V Ashfield 68 Bassetlaw 69 Reducing the risks VII Broxtowe 73 Key statistics XI Gedling 74 Mansfield 75 Publications and guidance XII Newark and Sherwood 75 Key to the entries XIV Rushcliffe 78 Entries on the Register by local planning XVI Rutland (UA) 79 authority Derby, City of (UA) 1 Derbyshire 2 Amber Valley 2 Bolsover 4 Chesterfield 5 Derbyshire Dales 6 Erewash 7 High Peak 8 North East Derbyshire 10 Peak District (NP) 11 South Derbyshire 11 Leicester, City of (UA) 14 Leicestershire 17 Charnwood 17 Harborough 20 Hinckley and Bosworth 22 Melton 23 North West Leicestershire 24 Lincolnshire 25 Boston 25 East Lindsey 27 Lincoln 35 North Kesteven 37 South Holland 39 South Kesteven 41 West Lindsey 45 North East Lincolnshire (UA) 50 North Lincolnshire (UA) 52 Northamptonshire 56 Corby 56 Daventry 56 East Northamptonshire 58 Kettering 61 Northampton 61 South Northamptonshire 62 Wellingborough 65 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2018 / EAST MIDLANDS LISTED BUILDINGS THE REGISTER Listing is the most commonly encountered type of statutory protection of heritage assets. A listed building Content and criteria (or structure) is one that has been granted protection as being of special architectural or historic interest. The LISTING older and rarer a building is, the more likely it is to be listed. Buildings less than 30 years old are listed only if Definition they are of very high quality and under threat.
    [Show full text]