FIRST AMENDMENT LAW REVIEW Volume 13 | Issue 1 Article 3 9-1-2014 Cross, Crucifix, Culture: An Approach to the Constitutional Meaning of Confession Symbols Frederick Mark Gedicks Pasquale Annicchino Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/falr Part of the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Frederick M. Gedicks & Pasquale Annicchino, Cross, Crucifix, Culture: An Approach to the Constitutional Meaning of Confession Symbols, 13 First Amend. L. Rev. 71 (2018). Available at: http://scholarship.law.unc.edu/falr/vol13/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in First Amendment Law Review by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. CROSS, CRUCIFIX, CULTURE: AN APPROACH TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF CONFESSIONAL SYMBOLS FREDERICK MARK GEDICKS* PASQUALE ANNICCHINO** ABSTRACT In the United States and Europe the constitutionality of government displays of confessional symbols depends on whether the Guy Anderson Chair & Professor of Law, Brigham Young University Law School, Provo, Utah; Visiting Research Fellow, ReligioWest, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Florence, Italy, November - December 2012. J.D., University of Southern California; B.A. (economics), Brigham Young University. Professor Gedicks acknowledges travel and research funding from the Center for the Study of Europe at BYU, the ReligioWest project at EU1, and the Terry L. Crapo Professorship at BYU Law School. The authors received helpful comments and criticisms on earlier versions of this Article at workshops with the faculties of BYU Law School and the University of St.