DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Specifications for D5 Track-Type Tractor AEXQ2535-01

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Specifications for D5 Track-Type Tractor AEXQ2535-01 D5 Track-Type Tractor Technical Specifications Configurations and features may vary by region. Please consult your Cat® dealer for availability in your area. Table of Contents D5 Track-Type Tractor Specifications .....................................3 D5 SU . 8 Engine . 3 Blade . 8 Air Conditioning System . 3 D5 Super LGP . 9 Fluid/Refill Capacities . 3 Blade . 9 Transmission . 3 D5 Fine Grading Arrangement . 10 Drawbar Pull . 4 D5 Super LGP . 10 Hydraulic Controls – Pressures . 4 Track Shoes . 11 Hydraulic Controls – Pump . 4 Dimensions – Rear Attachments . 12 D5 VPAT . 5 Ripper . 12 Blades . 5 Winch . 13 D5 LGP VPAT . 6 Standards . 14 Blades . 6 Sustainability – Sound and Vibration Levels . 14 D5 VPAT Fine Grading . 7 Advanced Cabin Filtration . 14 Blades . 7 Technology Features . 15 Standard and Optional Equipment ..................16 (continued on next page) D5 Track-Type Tractor Specifications Table of Contents (continued) D5 Track Type Tractor – Waste Handler Key Features and Benefits .........................19 D5 Waste Handler – SU . 24 Specifications ....................................20 Blade . 24 D5 Waste Handler Features . 25 Engine . 20 Track Shoes . 26 Air Conditioning System . 20 Dimensions – Rear Attachments . 26 Fluid/Refill Capacities . 20 Ripper . 26 Transmission . 20 Winch . 27 Drawbar Pull . 21 Standards . 28 Hydraulic Controls – Pressures . 21 Sustainability – Sound and Vibration Levels . 28 Hydraulic Controls – Pump . 21 Advanced Cabin Filtration . 28 D5 Waste Handler – LGP VPAT . 22 Technology Features . 29 Blade . 22 Standard and Optional Equipment ..................30 D5 Waste Handler – VPAT . 23 Blade . 23 D5 Track-Type Tractor – Heavy Duty/Forestry Key Features and Benefits .........................33 D5 SU – Heavy Duty/Forestry . 37 Specifications ....................................34 Blade . 37 D5 Heavy Duty/Forestry Features . 38 Engine . 34 Track Shoes . 39 Air Conditioning System . 34 Dimensions – Rear Attachments . 40 Fluid/Refill Capacities . 34 Ripper . 40 Transmission . 34 Winch . 41 Drawbar Pull . 35 Standards . 42 Hydraulic Controls – Pressures . 35 Sustainability – Sound and Vibration Levels . 42 Hydraulic Controls – Pump . 35 Advanced Cabin Filtration . 42 D5 VPAT – Heavy Duty/Forestry . 36 Technology Features . 43 Blade . 36 Standard and Optional Equipment ..................44 D5 Track-Type Tractor – Fire Suppression Dozer Key Features and Benefits .........................47 D5 VPAT – Fire Suppression . 51 Specifications ....................................48 Blade . 52 D5 Fire Suppression Dozer Features . 53 Engine . 48 Track Shoes . 54 Air Conditioning System . 48 Dimensions – Rear Attachments . 55 Fluid/Refill Capacities . 48 Ripper . 55 Transmission . 48 Winch . 56 Drawbar Pull . 49 Standards . 57 Hydraulic Controls – Pressures . 49 Sustainability – Sound and Vibration Levels . 57 Hydraulic Controls – Pump . 49 Advanced Cabin Filtration . 57 D5 LGP VPAT – Fire Suppression . 50 Technology Features . 58 Blade . 50 Standard and Optional Equipment ..................59 2 D5 Track-Type Tractor Specifications Engine Air Conditioning System Engine Model Cat® C7.1 The air conditioning system on this machine contains the Emissions U.S. EPA Tier 4 Final/ fluorinated greenhouse gas refrigerant R134a (Global Warming EU Stage V/Japan 2014/ Potential = 1430). The system contains 1.36 kg of refrigerant which Korea Tier 4 Final has a CO2 equivalent of 1.946 metric tonnes. Build Number 17B Fluid/Refill Capacities Power Train Fully automatic 3-speed Net Power (1,770 rpm) Fuel Tank 315 L 83.2 gal ISO 9249/SAE J1349 127 kW 170 hp DEF Tank 16 L 4.2 gal ISO 9249/SAE J1349 (DIN) 172 mhp Cooling System 41 L 10.8 gal Engine Power – Maximum (1,600 rpm) Engine Crankcase 18 L 4.8 gal ISO 14396 148 kW 198 hp Power Train 160 L 42.3 gal ISO 14396 (DIN) 201 mhp Roller Frames Standard/LGP (each) 18/27 L 4.8/7.1 gal Gross Power – Maximum (1,600 rpm) Final Drives (each) 8 L 2.1 gal SAE J1995 151 kW 202 hp Hydraulic System 80 L 21.1 gal Bore 105 mm 4.1 in Stroke 135 mm 5.3 in Transmission Displacement 7.1 L 433 in3 0.5 Forward 2.5 km/h (2.4 km/h) 1.6 mph (1.5 mph) • Net power advertised is the power available at the engine flywheel 1.0 Forward 3.3 km/h (3.0 km/h) 2.1 mph (1.9 mph) when the engine is equipped with a fan, air cleaner, clean emissions 1.5 Forward 4.4 km/h 2.7 mph module and alternator. 2.0 Forward 5.8 km/h 3.6 mph • Advertised power is tested per the specified standard in effect at the time of manufacture. 2.5 Forward 7.5 km/h 4.7 mph • No derating required up to 3000 m (9,840 ft) altitude, beyond 3.0 Forward 9.8 km/h 6.1 mph 3000 m (9,840 ft) automatic derating occurs. 0.5 Reverse 3.1 km/h (2.9 km/h) 1.9 mph (1.8 mph) • All non-road Tier 4 Interim and Final, Stage IIIB, IV and V, 1.0 Reverse 4.1 km/h (3.5 km/h) 2.5 mph (2.2 mph) Japan 2014 (Tier 4 Final) and Korea Tier 4 Final diesel engines are required to use only ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) fuels 1.5 Reverse 5.4 km/h 3.4 mph containing 15 ppm (mg/kg) sulfur or less. Biodiesel blends up to B20 2.0 Reverse 7.1 km/h 4.4 mph (20% blend by volume) are acceptable when blended with 15 ppm 2.5 Reverse 9.5 km/h 5.9 mph (mg/kg) sulfur or less ULSD. B20 should meet ASTM D7467 3.0 Reverse 12.2 km/h 7.6 mph specification (biodiesel blend stock should meet Cat biodiesel Maximum Drawbar Pull spec, ASTM D6751 or EN 14214). Cat DEO-ULS™ or oils that meet the Cat ECF-3, API CJ-4, and ACEA E9 specification are 1.0 Forward 320 kN 71,939 lbf required. Consult your OMM for further machine specific fuel 2.0 Forward 198 kN 44,512 lbf recommendations. 3.0 Forward 113 kN 25,403 lbf • Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF) used in Cat Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) systems must meet the requirements outlined NOTE: Data between brackets are values for EU. in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard 22241. 3 D5 Track-Type Tractor Specifications Drawbar Pull Hydraulic Controls – Pressures lb × kg × Maximum Implement 25 000 kPa 3,626 psi 100 100 D5 Drawbar Pull Operating Pressure 350 Maximum Steering 45 000 kPa 6,527 psi 70 Operating Pressure 300 60 Hydraulic Controls – Pump 250 50 Pump Output 200 Implement 127 L/min 33.5 gal/min bar Pull 40 Steering 165 L/min 43.5 gal/min aw 150 30 Fan 49 L/min 12.9 gal/min Dr Lift Cylinder Flow 127 L/min 33.5 gal/min 100 20 Tilt Cylinder Flow 127 L/min 33.5 gal/min 10 50 Ripper Cylinder Flow 127 L/min 33.5 gal/min Angle Cylinder Flow – VPAT 127 L/min 33.5 gal/min 0 0 0246810 km/h 01 23456 mph Speed 4 D5 Track-Type Tractor Specifications D5 VPAT Operating Weight* 17 180 kg 37,875 lb Shipping Weight** 16 950 kg 37,368 lb Ground Pressure (ISO 16754) 47.6 kPa 6.9 psi 5 Undercarriage (Standard) 40 Section/ 7 Bottom Rollers 8 1 Track Gauge 1890 mm 74.4 in 11 2 Width of Track Shoe (Standard) 610 mm 24 in 3 Width of Tractor 2500 mm 98.4 in 4 Length of Track on Ground 2562 mm 100.9 in Ground Contact Area (ISO 16754) 3.5 m2 5,469 in2 Grouser Height (Moderate Service) 57 mm 2.2 in Ground Clearance 358 mm 14.1 in 5 Machine Height*** 3085 mm 121.5 in 6 Length of Basic Tractor**** 4644 mm 182.8 in 10 All dimensions above with Cat Abrasion undercarriage with Extreme Service shoes of maximum 9 width for configuration, VPAT blade, and calculated per ISO 16754 unless otherwise specified . 4 6 * Operating weight includes blade, lubricants, coolant, full fuel tank, ROPS/FOPS cab, drawbar, and 75 kg (165 lb) operator . ** Shipping weight includes blade lift cylinders, C-frame, lubricants, coolant, 10% fuel, ROPS/FOPS cab, and drawbar . 2 *** Machine height from tip of grouser to top of Product Link™ Antenna . For sweeps, add 64 mm (2 .5 in) to overall machine height . For forestry sweeps, add 81 mm (3 .2 in) . With Extreme Service, add 9 mm (0 .4 in) . When Cat Grade with 3D antennas are installed there is no added machine height . 7 **** Length of Basic Tractor from the back of the drawbar to front of C-frame . 1 3 12 LGP VPAT Model Shown Blades Configuration VPAT VPAT – Foldable Capacity (ISO 9246) 3.5 m3 4.6 yd3 3.5 m3 4.6 yd3 7 Width across End Bits 3272 mm 10.7 ft 3272 mm 10.7 ft Width without End Bits 3159 mm 10.4 ft 3159 mm 10.4 ft Width across End Bits (Blade Angled 24°) 2998 mm 118.0 in 2558 mm 100.7 in Width without End Bits (Blade Angled 24°) 2908 mm 114.5 in 2539 mm 97.0 in Maximum Blade Angle 24° 24° 8 Height 1261 mm 49.6 in 1261 mm 49.6 in 9 Dig Depth 559 mm 22.0 in 559 mm 22.0 in 10 Lift Height 971 mm 38.2 in 971 mm 38.2 in 11 Maximum Tilt at Blade Corner 257 mm 10.1 in 257 mm 10.1 in Maximum Tilt Angle 8.5° 8.5° Pitch Adjustment 60° (cutting edge/ground, 60° (cutting edge/ground, nominal); –2°/+4° nominal); –2°/+4° 12 Length of Machine (Blade Straight) 5000 mm 197 in 5016 mm 197 in Length of Machine (Blade Angled 24°, without fuel tank guard) 5621 mm 221 in 5621 mm 221 in Blade Weight 1090 kg 2,403 lb 1286 kg 2,835 lb 5 D5 Track-Type Tractor Specifications D5 LGP VPAT Operating Weight* 19 170 kg 42,263 lb Shipping Weight** 18 940 kg 41,756 lb Ground Pressure (ISO 16754) 32.6 kPa 4.7 psi 5 Undercarriage (Standard) 46 Section/ 8 Bottom Rollers 8 1 Track Gauge 2160 mm 85.0 in 11 2 Width of Track Shoe (Standard) 840 mm 33 in 3 Width of Tractor 3000 mm 118.1 in 4 Length of Track on Ground 3116 mm 122.7 in Ground Contact Area (ISO 16754) 5.8 m2 8,995 in2 Grouser Height (Moderate Service) 57 mm 2.2 in Ground Clearance 473 mm 18.6 in 5 Machine Height*** 3200 mm 126.0 in 6 Length of Basic Tractor**** 5012 mm 197.3 in 10 All dimensions above with Cat Abrasion undercarriage with Extreme Service shoes of maximum 9 width for configuration, VPAT blade, and calculated per ISO 16754 unless otherwise specified .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DAO Level 3 Certificate in Military Engineering (Armoured) Titan and Trojan Crew Supervision
    Qualification Handbook DAO Level 3 Certificate in Military Engineering (Armoured) Titan and Trojan crew supervision QN: 603/3232/3 The Qualification Overall Objective for the Qualifications This handbook relates to the following qualification: DAO Level 3 Certificate in Military Engineering (Armoured) Titan and Trojan crew supervision Pre-entry Requirements Learners are required to have completed the Class ME (Armd) Class 0-2 course, must be fully qualified AFV crewman and hold full category H driving licence Unit Content and Rules of Combination This qualification is made up of a total of 6 mandatory units and no optional units. To be awarded this qualification the candidate must achieve a total of 13 credits as shown in the table below. Unit Unit of assessment Level GLH TQT Credit number value L/617/0309 Supervise Titan Operation and 3 25 30 3 associated Equipment L/617/0312 Supervise Titan Crew 3 16 19 2 R/617/0313 Supervise Trojan Operation and 3 26 30 3 associated Equipment D/617/0315 Supervise Trojan Crew 3 16 19 2 H/617/0316 Supervise Trojan and Titan AFV 3 10 19 2 maintenance tasks K/617/0317 Carry out emergency procedures and 3 7 11 1 communication for Trojan and Titan AFV Totals 100 128 13 Age Restriction This qualification is available to learners aged 18 years and over. Opportunities for Progression This qualification creates a number of opportunities for progression through career development and promotion. Exemption No exemptions have been identified. 2 Credit Transfer Credits from identical RQF units that have already been achieved by the learner may be transferred.
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-88-77 Army Disposal
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on GAO>; Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives September 1988 ARMYDISPOSAL Construction Equipment Prematurely Disposed of in Europe RESTRKTED-Not to be released outside the Gend Accounting Office except on the basis of the specifk 8~4 by the Of&e of CongressionalRelations. United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-229358 September 20,1988 The Honorable John Dingell Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Committee on Energy and Commerce House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: The Army, having decided that its fleet of construction vehicles was becoming too costly to keep in repair, directed European units in 1985 to dispose of commercially available combat engineer construction vehi- cles. The Army purchased 850 replacement vehicles for Europe costing about $79 million. The purchase was part of a worldwide replacement program totaling about $470 million through fiscal year 1987. As you requested, we reviewed the Army’s replacement of construction vehicles in Europe. Our objective was to determine the basis for replac- ing these vehicles. We agree with the Army’s goal to replace worn-out vehicles with stan- dardized ones, but question its decision to dispose of usable vehicles without showing that it was cost-effective to do so. Army officials stated that old construction vehicles were difficult to support and that high repair costs made replacing the entire fleet -regardless of condi- tion-cost-effective. We found no analyses to support the Army’s position.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Sector Technical Education and Skills
    TRAINING REGULATIONS Heavy Equipment Operation (Bulldozer) NC II CONSTRUCTION SECTOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND SKILLS DEVELOPMENT AUTHOR ITY East Service Road, South Superhighway, Taguig City, Metro Manila BULLDOZER TR HEAVY - EQUIPMENT OPERATION (Bulldozer) Promulgated July 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONSTRUCTION - HEAVY EQUIPMENT SUB - SECTOR HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATION (BULLDOZER) NC II SECTION 1 HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATION QUALIFICATION SECTION 2 COMPETENCY STANDARDS SECTION 3 TRAINING STANDARDS 3.1 Curriculum Design 3. 2 Training Delivery 3.3 Trainee Entry Requirements 3.4 List of Tools, Equipment and Materials 3.5 Training Facilities 3.6 Trainers' Qualifications SECTION 4 ASSESSMENT AND CERTIFICATION ARRANGEMENT COMPETENCY MAP DEFINITION OF TERMS ACKNOWLEDGEMEN TS TR HEAVY - EQUIPMENT OPERATION (Bulldozer) Promulgated July 2007 TRAINING REGULATIONS FOR HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATION - BULLDOZER SECTION 1 HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATION - BULLDOZER The HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPERATION (BULLDOZER) NC II qualification consists of competencies that workers must achieve to enable them to perform tasks such as excavating, dozing, ripping, winching, and clearing of earth materials in construction sites or other locations. This qualification is packaged from the competency map of Construction - Heavy Equipment sub - sector as shown in Annex A. The units of competency comprising this qualification include the following: CODE NO. BASIC COMPETENCIES Units of Competency 500311105 Participate in workplace communication 500311106 Work in a team environment 500311107 Practice career professionalism 500311108 Practice occupational health and safety procedures CODE NO. COMMON COMPETENCIES Units of Competency CON931201 Prepare construction materials and tools CON311201 Observe procedures, specifications and manuals of inst ruction CON311202 Interpret technical drawings and plans CON311203 Perform mensurations and calculations CON311204 Maintain tools and equipment CODE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Operator Dies After Being Caught Between Bulldozer's Track and Fender
    Operator Dies after Being Caught between Bulldozer’s Track and Fender Investigation: # 10WA015 Release Date: September 14, 2012 SHARP Report: # 52-26-2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS PAGE SUMMARY 3 RECOMMENDATIONS 3 INTRODUCTION 4 Employer 4 Employer Safety Program and Training 4 Victim 5 Equipment 5 INVESTIGATION 7 CAUSE OF DEATH 10 CONTRIBUTING FACTORS 11 RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISCUSSION 11 REFERENCES 15 INVESTIGATOR INFORMATION 16 FACE PROGRAM INFORMATION 16 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 17 2 SUMMARY In February of 2010, a 68-year-old male construction crew supervisor and heavy equipment operator died of injuries he received after being crushed between the track and fender of his bulldozer. The operator was employed by a contractor that does site development, single family home construction, and commercial construction work. He had previously owned a construction contracting business and had 48 years of experience operating bulldozers and other heavy construction equipment. On the day of the fatal incident, the operator was supervising a crew. The crew was working at a job site zoned for commercial development, where structural fill was being brought in and dumped and then leveled and compacted. As dump trucks hauled fill onto the site, the operator was using a Caterpillar D4H Series II bulldozer to level the fill and was also directing the drivers as to where they should deposit their loads. At 7:40 AM, the operator exited the bulldozer on its right side to speak with a truck driver about where the driver should deposit his load of fill. When he did this, he left the bulldozer running and did not set the parking brake.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Peacekeeping Missions Military Engineers Manual
    United Nations Peacekeeping Missions Military Engineer Unit Manual September 2015 0 Preface We are delighted to introduce the United Nations Peacekeeping Missions Military Unit Manual on Engineers—an essential guide for commanders and staff deployed in peacekeeping operations, and an important reference for Member States and the staff at United Nations Headquarters. For several decades, United Nations peacekeeping has evolved significantly in its complexity. The spectrum of multi-dimensional UN peacekeeping includes challenging tasks such as helping to restore state authority, protecting civilians and disarming, demobilizing and reintegrating ex-combatants. In today’s context, peacekeeping Missions are deploying into environments where they can expect to confront asymmetric threats from armed groups over large swaths of territory. Consequently, the capabilities required for successful peacekeeping Missions demand ever-greater improvement. UN peacekeeping operations are rarely limited to one type of activity. While deployed in the context of a political framework supporting a peace agreement, or in the context of creating the conditions for a return to stability, peacekeeping Missions may require military units to perform challenging tasks involving the judicious use of force, particularly in situations where the host state is unable to provide security and maintain public order. To meet these complex peacekeeping challenges, military components often play a pivotal role in providing and maintaining a secure environment. Under these circumstances, the deployment of UN Military Engineers can contribute decisively towards successful achievement of the Mission’s goals by providing the physical wherewithal to exist, sustain and fulfill its mandate. As the UN continues its efforts to broaden the base of Troop Contributing Countries, and in order to ensure the effective interoperability of all UN Military Engineer Units, there is a need to formalize capability standards.
    [Show full text]
  • The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle
    Canadian Military History Volume 20 Issue 3 Article 9 2011 The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle Ed Storey Canadian Expeditionary Forces Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Recommended Citation Storey, Ed "The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle." Canadian Military History 20, 3 (2011) This Feature is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Storey: Light Armoured Vehicle The Success of the Light Armoured Vehicle Ed Storey s a military vehicle enthusiast make them cost effective and easier AI was quite excited to see the Abstract: In order to understand the to deploy. article by Frank Maas in Canadian purchase of military vehicles, one must The AVGP series of vehicles Military History dealing with the understand the vehicle and where it falls purchased by Canada in 1976 was in the evolution of vehicle procurement. Canadian Light Armoured Vehicle This article, written in response to an a 10.7 ton, 6 wheeled amphibious (LAV) series of vehicles (vol.20, earlier article in Canadian Military vehicle based on the Swiss Mowag no.2 Spring 2011). I was also keenly History by Frank Maas, examines the Piranha I. Canada bought three interested in the article as my Father chronology and motivations behind versions: the Cougar 76 mm Fire was stationed at CFB Petawawa in the Canadian acquisition of wheeled Support Vehicle, the Grizzly armoured fighting vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Everyday As a Bulldozer and Excavator Owner/Operator Is Tough
    (Left) Ryan Monteleone Excavation, Inc.’s new Cat D6R Fire Dozer purchased from Johnson Machinery. (Above) Ryan Monteleone, Owner, Ryan Monteleone Excavation, Inc. Written By: Brian Hoover Working everyday as a bulldozer Fire’s bulldozer training program located fighting fire with fire. After all fires are and excavator owner/operator is at the Clark Training Center in Riverside, extinguished, the dozer operator is tough work. Now try doing it while California. Applicants come from both then called upon to rehabilitate the surrounded by a blazing California the fire service and the construction previously bulldozed areas to protect wildfire. This is exactly what Ryan industry. Crews and individuals from against mudslides. Here dozers are Monteleone does for approximately all over California must become certified utilized along with excavators to 30 to 60 days each year. He and his and then renew their certification every cleanup and move debris for both two other operators sit confidently year. This intense training is necessary cosmetic and erosion control purposes. behind an enclosed cab, with almost due to the obvious dangers associated Ryan Monteleone of Ryan Monteleone zero visibility, protected only by fire with this trade. Like with any firefighter, Excavation, Inc. further explains his curtains. Much of wildfire confinement serious injury or death is always an interesting niche further, “We are can be attributed to heavy machine ongoing concern. These men and contracted through the U.S. Forestry operators like Ryan Monteleone, who women are called on by the California Service and CAL Fire as Fire Ready can work at preventing wildfires at an Department of Forestry to protect Bull Dozer operators.
    [Show full text]
  • No Slide Title
    QUALITY ©H&L Tooth Company 2019 since 1931 ® H&L Allied Equipment Flyer 35.2019 Bulldozer BACK-UP Ripper Assemblies Pivot Rod H&L Back-up Rippers are mounted to the back of the bulldozer blade and are designed to rip while the dozer is backing. C Production is increased since the equipment is working full time B in both directions. Tight material, such as hardpan, D.G. and Mounting rock is broken up making production easier with less wear and Bracket tear to the machine. (Box) Rippers operate independently! As the tractor moves forward, Hole for placement of the ripper shanks drag freely behind the dozer blade and when D PIN to position Ripper the tractor moves rearward, each shank will fall into the ripping inoperative position. When shanks needs to be inoperative, simply raise the Retracted Position shank assembly and insert a pin or bolt in the bracket as shown in the drawing detail. H&L replaceable digging Teeth are Uniforged®. Back-up ripper A shanks are designed to install on All-Makes of dozers but were designed specifically for Caterpillar dozers. H&L assemblies Ripper Shank will consist of the mounting bracket (Box), an alloy and hardened steel pivot rod, two cotter pins, ripper shanks, Tooth, Ground Level Flexpin®. The bracket has retract position hole for a pin or bolt. Ripping DEPTH not Mounting instructions: when mounting and welding the to exceed 8.00” bracket to the moldboard of the dozer blade, care should be taken to align it so the shanks will dig in-line with the tracks of the tractor.
    [Show full text]
  • Item 156 Bulldozer Work
    156 Item 156 Bulldozer Work 1. DESCRIPTION Excavate, remove, use, or dispose of materials with a bulldozer. Construct, shape, and finish earthwork in conformity with the required lines, grades, and typical cross-sections as shown on the plans, or as directed. 2. EQUIPMENT Use a tractor, crawler, or rubber tired type with a blade attachment at least 8 ft. long. Use a scarifier or ripper with the required tractor when necessary. Use equipment of the type specified on the plans, meeting the following requirements: 2.1. Type A. Manufacturer’s rated net flywheel power of less than 150 horsepower based on SAE standard J1349. 2.2. Type B. Manufacturer’s rated net flywheel power of 150 or greater horsepower based on SAE standard J1349. 3. CONSTRUCTION Perform bulldozer work on the areas as specified on the plans, utilizing equipment as specified above. Rough in with bulldozer work where plans designate “Bulldozer Work” and “Blading,” or “Road Grader Work,” within the same limits. Finish in accordance with specifications for “Blading” or “Road Grader Work.” Compact embankment to ordinary compaction in accordance with Item 132, “Embankment,” unless otherwise shown on the plans. 4. MEASUREMENT This Item will be measured by the actual number of hours of use of the specified type of equipment operated. 5. PAYMENT The work performed in accordance with this Item and measured as provided under “Measurement” will be paid for at the unit price bid for “Bulldozer Work.” This price is full compensation for furnishing and operating equipment, labor, materials, tools, and incidentals. “Sprinkling” and “Rolling” will not be paid for directly but will be subsidiary to this Item.
    [Show full text]
  • Noise Level Analysis of a Bulldozer Used in Constructing a Forest Road in Mediterranean Region of Turkey
    African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 5(19), pp. 2624-2628, 4 October, 2010 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR ISSN 1991-637X ©2010 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Noise level analysis of a bulldozer used in constructing a forest road in Mediterranean region of Turkey Hasan Serin* and Abdullah E. Akay Faculty of Forestry, Kahramanmara Sütçü mam University, 46060 Kahramanmaras, Turkey. Accepted 20 April, 2010 Heavy machinery utilized in forest operations, as one of the working environments with intensive noise disturbance, result detrimental effects on the workers’ health. Particularly, high level noise generated from the road construction machines causes physiologic and psychological health problems on the operators. Among these problems, one of the most important occupational problems is hearing impairment or permanent hearing loss. In this study, the average and peak noise levels generated by a CAT D7G model bulldozer during two working stages (that is, unloaded running stage and road construction stage) of a road construction activity were measured from the operator cabin. The results indicated that the average noise levels for unloaded running stage and road construction stage were 73.87 and 84.11 dBA, respectively. The peak noise levels were measured as 95.90 and 113.40 dBA for unloaded running stage and road construction stage, respectively. Thus, it was found that the mean values of the average noise levels in both working stages were less than the warning limit of 85 dBA. The results also indicated that all of the peak noise levels were over the hazard limit of 90 dBA for both stages.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Pc210lci-10/Pc200i-10 Machine Control Hydraulic Excavator
    Technical Paper Development of PC210LCi-10/PC200i-10 Machine Control Hydraulic Excavator Yuki Shimano Yoshiki Kami Kenichirou Shimokaze In recent years, the efficient construction work thanks to the computerized construction utilizing the ICT technology has been expanded in the market, which contains shortening of a construction period by abolishing the finishing stake which was necessary in the conventional construction work, improvement of execution accuracy, and execution progress management. From this trend, there are growing needs for construction machinery responding to it. When it comes to hydraulic excavators, machines installed with Machine Guidance (MG) have been commercialized including after-market products. However, finishing grading was somewhat dependent on skills of operators monitoring the display. Accordingly, we have developed the machine-controlled hydraulic excavator highly improved in construction efficiency, which enables machine control in a series of operations from rough digging to grading, thanks to the combination of the hydraulic control technology from Komatsu unique components and the GNSS surveying technology. This excavator has released on the computerized-construction-advanced markets of Japan, U.S. and Europe ahead of other competitors. Key Words: PC210LCi-10/PC200i-10, Machine Control Hydraulic Excavator, Automatic Grading Assist, Automatic Stop Control, ICT Construction, Construction Management, GNSS perform work at a construction site without finishing stake 1. Introduction according to the guidance while looking at the guidance monitor. Therefore, final finishing accuracy was largely Construction machinery utilizing GNSS surveying dependent on the skill of operator. technology contributes greatly to the reduction in man-hours We have developed an innovative 20-ton class MC through abolishing of finishing stake.
    [Show full text]
  • Earthmoving Construction Automation with Military Applications: Past, Present and Future
    35th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2018) Earthmoving Construction Automation with Military Applications: Past, Present and Future Q.P. Haa, L. Yenb, and C. Balaguerc a Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia b Land Vehicles & Systems, Defence Science & Technology Group, SA 5111, Australia c Robotics Lab, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain E-mail: { [email protected] ; [email protected]; [email protected] } Abstract – Amongst increasing innovations in autonomy of construction plant, in both civilian and frontier engineering sciences, the advancements in military domains, to improve their efficiency, Robotic and Autonomous Systems (RAS) has productivity, quality and reliability [7]. brought about a new horizon in construction Robotic and autonomous systems tailored for the applications. There is evidence of the increasing military call upon the ability to integrate sensors, vision interest in RAS technologies in the civil construction imaging, actuators, end-effector manipulation, computer sector being reflected in construction efforts of many control and human interface for operations in military forces. In particular, Army or ground-based unstructured, difficult and hazardous conditions. Army forces are frequently called upon to conduct construction tasks for enhancing force protection construction tasks as part of military operations, include such earthmoving tasks as filling of protective tasks which could be partially or fully aided by the barriers (HESCO baskets), building dirt bunding employment of RAS technologies. Along with recent structures, as well as anti-tank ditches and trenching. advances in the Internet of Things (IoT) and cyber- For such tasks a variety of heavy construction physical system infrastructure, it is essential to machinery such as excavators, bulldozers, wheel loaders, examine the current maturity, technical feasibility, graders and articulated dump trucks etc.
    [Show full text]