DOCSLIB.ORG

Zo REUNIFICATION ORGANISATION (ZORO)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zo REUNIFICATION ORGANISATION (ZORO) (Aq, *tne, rlr*n5 , Mo.ll&rtt , , f q7 zo REUNIFICATIONORGANISATION (ZORO) GENEALHEADQUARTERS : ZBRAM United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigeneous Issues 5th Sessionat (Jnited Nutions Headquarters' New Y?r!, lSth tô 26th May, 2006 Item No 3 (a) & (b) Millennium DevelopmentGoal und IndigeneousPeoples Re-definingthe Gouls HIHHÏ'â Zo R eu n if i c *, ":L:âl[*il RespectedChair, Permitme to congratulateyou on your electionto the Chair of this augustForum, and also let me thank you for the opportunityof talking issuesand concernsof the Zo indigenouspeople that - . Zo peoplewere then inhabitantsof the undividedcountry of their own, roughly 91,000square miles, covering present hill areasof the TipperahHills,Tripura (India); the CacharHills, Assam (lndia); the south-easternand western hills of Manipur(India); the Lushai Hills, now called Mizoram (India); the ChittagongHilts and Hill Tracts (Bangladesh);the ArakanHills, the Chin Hills, the Lower and lJpperChindwin of SomraTracts including the Kachin Hills (Myanmar) . The British colonial force invadedthe Zo countrytwice by launchingthe historic BritishExpeditions in l87l and l8BB.The invadingforces in 1890took controlof the land of Zo peoplelfiercelydefènded by the tribal forcesunder command of Zo chiefs and Pasaltha(knights). The colonial rulers divided the Zo country for administrativeconvenience and had the Zo peoplebrought under three administrative units respectivelyheaded by the Chief Commissionerof Burma,Rangoon; the Lt. Governorof Bengal,Calcutta and the Chief Commissionerof Assam,Shillong. o The colonialrulers at the historicChin-Lushai Conference in 1892 at Fort William,Calcutta, attended by senioradministrators of thenBritish-India Government 'the passeda resolution that whole tract of countryknown as the Chin-LushaiHills should be brought under one administrativehead as soon as this can be done." This one-lineresolution even to this day assumesgreat importance for the dividedZo people who had later acquireddifferent nationalities. The British India Governmenthad declaredthe Zo country as "ExcludedArea" from the rest of the British ruled statesand enforcedthe laws, such as, the Foreign JurisdictionAct 1890and amended1937 Iater; the ScheduledDistricts Act 1884,the Chin Hills Regulation1896 and the Bengal EasternFrontier Regulation1873 and amended1925 later. Zo peoplethen were a free and independentpeople running their own simple but efficientadministration headed by Chiefsand their Council of Elderstill the British invadedand conqueredthem. The British rule cameto end after the Worid War II following the independence of India (1947)the independenceof Burma(1948) and the independenceof Pakistan ( l e48) o Consequenton the political changesbrought about by the outcomeof the World War II, onepart of the Zo countryunder the Chief CommissionerofAssam was acceded to the Indian Union,the otherpart underthe Chief Commissionerof Burmawas acceded to the Union of Burma and the remainingthhd part of the Zo country under the Lt. Governorof Bengal had fallen to the then East Pakistan,now Bangladesh. RespectedChair, that was in brief the fate of the original Zo country and how the Zo peoplegot divided,like cattlesold in themarket, and they acquireddifferent nationalities, suchas Indians, Burmese, Bangladeshis. Nevertheless, divided Zo people,having the advantageof living in contiguousareas have been preservingtheir colrunonethnic identityand culturalafÏinity mostly throughthe traditionalsocial, cultural, economic and religiousinteractions. RespectedChair, with your permission,I would like to draw kind attentionof this augustForum that - o Zo ethnicgroup of peoplehad been and are still the leastknown people by virtue of the fact that the territory they inhabitedare fàr-flung, land-lockedhill areaswhere majority of the people in remoter places normally perform journeys on foot due to absenceof communicationand transport infrastructure. Absenceof basicinfrastructure for providing healthcare, education, security and so on hadthe betterpart of the divided Zo peopleto remainextremely backward and poor with no securitywhatsoever when modernworld is amazedat the emerging advancementof Science& Technologyto maketheir litè betterand more comfortable. RespectedChair, please allow me thento suggestthat implementation of theMillennium DevelopmentGoals (MDGs) in respectof leastknown and poorer group of indigenous peoplecan be a reality within the time frame only when. A social and cultural infrastructureof internationaldimension for cofilmon use by ethnicgroup of indigenouspeople, regardlessof affrliationto nationality, be set up throughthe sponsorshipsof IPOs / NGOs for providing securityand training to help assistand prepare the peopleto work out their basic humanneeds. With a prayerthat MDGs be redifinedto directly benefitinterests of indigeneous people,I concludemy speech. Once again,thank you, respectedChair. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ethnic History and Identity of the Zo Tribes in North East India
    Journal of North East India Studies Vol. 5(1), Jan.-Jun. 2015, pp. 39-50. Ethnic History and Identity of the Zo Tribes in North East India H. Thangtungnung North East India is a hotspot of identity crisis and ethnic divisions. The Chin, Kuki, Zomi and Mizo tribes who are collectively known as Zo people are no exception. They have close cultural, lingual and religious affinities and a com- mon ancestor called Zo. Historically, they have different theories of origin and migration based on their folklores, folktales and songs narrated down from one generation to another. The different origin theories like the Khul/Chhinlung or Cave origin theory, Chin Hills origin theory and Lost tribe (Manmasi) theory are among the most significant theories so far which speak, to some extent, some- thing about their history and origin. Of late, the Lost Tribe theory has gained momentum which claims that the Zo tribes are among the ten lost tribes of Israel, particularly from the tribe of Manasseh. Israeli Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar had recognised them as descendents of Israel in 2005, which was also approved by the Israeli government. Many have consequently immigrated to the ‘Holy Land’. In this backdrop, this paper is attempts to critically analyse and assess the ethnic origin of the Zo people with special reference to the lost tribe theory. Based on cultural and oral traditions, and Biblical sources, it also attempts to support that the Zo people are the ten lost tribe of Israel by substantiating various arguments to validate this origin theory. Keywords: Zo, Khul origin theory, Chin Hills theory, Lost tribe, Manmasi Introduction The Zo people are indigenous tribes of Manipur and Mizoram in Northeast India, Bangladesh and Chin State of Myanmar.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Zo People
    Mizoram University Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences (A Bi-Annual Refereed Journal) Vol IV Issue 2, December 2018 ISSN: 2395-7352 eISSN:2581-6780 The Lost Identity: A Study of the Zo People C. Lalhmingliana* Abstract It is believed that China is the home of different ethnic groups that scattered in different parts of the worlds. Among these ethnic groups, some stocks of Mongoloids were also believed to be originated from China. The Zo/Dzo/Jo people who were believed to be one stock of Mongoloid race were also believed to be originated from China and migrated to different parts of the world. Because of their migration to different parts, nomenclature tussle occurred among them that hindered in the attempt of solid identity. Keywords: Ethnic, Tribe, Identity, Migration, Nomenclature. Introduction of the particular geographical area into The end of World War II led to different states led to the question of who decolonization in different parts of the we are and who they are? world and this decolonization somehow led The question of Identity arose in this to an Identity crisis. The merger of different context because, as mentioned earlier, the states/countries gave rise to the question change in geographical boundary led to of “Who are we?” within the state and the question of insider and outsider in the separation of one territory led to the context of Indian Identity today. One such question of “Where are they?” The question Identity problem that arose in India is the of “Who am I?” became very important and identity of Zo people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chin Diaspora: a Great People Resource
    TTJ 13.2 (2010): 207-217 ISSN 1598-7140 The Chin Diaspora: A Great People Resource C. K. Hrang Tiam Myanmar Evangelical Graduate School of Theology, Myanmar Geographically, the Chin state is located in western Myanmar. There are nine townships: Hakha, Falam, Thantlang, Matupi, Kanpe- let, Mindat, Paletwa, Teddim and Tonzang. The following are excerpts regarding the landscape and ethnicity in Chin. The Chin Hills lie between latitude 24’ in the north and 21’45” on the south and between longitude 94’5” on the east and 93’20” on the west. It consists of a much broken and consorted mass of mountains, inter- sected by deep valleys and utterly devoid of plain and table land.1 The Chin state surrounds the Kachin (north side), the Arakan state (south side), Sagaing division in Burma (east side), and the international boundaries of Bangladesh and India (west side). Chin land covers an area of 13,902 square miles.2 Myanmar has eight major tribes: Burma, Chin, Kachin, Shan, Kaya, Kayin, Mon, and Rakhine. The Chin people can be divided into tribal groups as they called themselves as Asho, Cho (Sho), Khuami, Laimi, Mizo and Zomi.3 Some of the tribes have many clans within their tribes. For example, the Zomi people in Tedim Chin has 237 clans.4 The Chins were formally known as animists and head hunters – the latter was a myth because, historically, head hunters did not exist among the Chin. After their resistance was suppressed in 1890, the British ruled them and placed them under the Arakan. On January 4, 1974, almost thirty years after independence of Myanmar (1948), the Chin region was granted state status.5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Languages of Myanmar
    Ethnologue report for Myanmar Page 1 of 20 Languages of Myanmar [See also SIL publications on the languages of Myanmar.] Union of Myanmar, Pyeidaungzu Myanma Naingngandaw. Formerly Burma. 42,720,196. Speakers of Tibeto-Burman languages: 28,877,000 or 78% of the population, Daic languages 2,778,900 or 9.6%, Austro- Asiatic languages 1,934,900 or 6.7%, Hmong-Mien languages 6,000 (1991 J. Matisoff). National or official language: Burmese. Literacy rate: 66% to 78%; 78.5% over 15 years old (1991). Also includes Eastern Tamang, Geman Deng, Iu Mien, Malay (21,000), Sylheti, Chinese (1,015,000), people from Bangladesh and India (500,000). Information mainly from F. Lebar, G. Hickey, J. Musgrave 1964; A. Hale 1982; B. Comrie 1987; R. B. Jones 1988; J. Matisoff et al. 1996; D. Bradley 1997; R. Burling ms. (1998). Blind population: 214,440. Deaf population: 2,684,514. Deaf institutions: 1. The number of languages listed for Myanmar is 109. Of those, 108 are living languages and 1 is extinct. Living languages Achang [acn] 1,700 in Myanmar (1983). West of the Irrawaddy River in Katha District, near Banmauk, scattered among the Lashi. Along the China border. Alternate names: Anchan, Chung, Atsang, Acang, Ngac'ang, Ngachang, Ngochang, Mönghsa, Tai Sa'. Dialects: Maingtha. Classification: Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto- Burman, Lolo-Burmese, Burmish, Northern More information. Akha [ahk] 200,000 in Myanmar (1991 UBS). Population total all countries: 449,261. Eastern part of Kengtung Shan State. Also spoken in China, Laos, Thailand, Viet Nam. Alternate names: Kaw, Ekaw, Ko, Aka, Ikaw, Ak'a, Ahka, Khako, Kha Ko, Khao Kha Ko, Ikor, Aini, Yani.
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar ­ Languages | Ethnologue
    7/24/2016 Myanmar ­ Languages | Ethnologue Myanmar LANGUAGES Akeu [aeu] Shan State, Kengtung and Mongla townships. 1,000 in Myanmar (2004 E. Johnson). Status: 5 (Developing). Alternate Names: Akheu, Aki, Akui. Classi囕cation: Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman, Ngwi-Burmese, Ngwi, Southern. Comments: Non-indigenous. More Information Akha [ahk] Shan State, east Kengtung district. 200,000 in Myanmar (Bradley 2007a). Total users in all countries: 563,960. Status: 3 (Wider communication). Alternate Names: Ahka, Aini, Aka, Ak’a, Ekaw, Ikaw, Ikor, Kaw, Kha Ko, Khako, Khao Kha Ko, Ko, Yani. Dialects: Much dialectal variation; some do not understand each other. Classi囕cation: Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman, Ngwi-Burmese, Ngwi, Southern. More Information Anal [anm] Sagaing: Tamu town, 10 households. 50 in Myanmar (2010). Status: 6b (Threatened). Alternate Names: Namfau. Classi囕cation: Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman, Sal, Kuki-Chin-Naga, Kuki-Chin, Northern. Comments: Non- indigenous. Christian. More Information Anong [nun] Northern Kachin State, mainly Kawnglangphu township. 400 in Myanmar (2000 D. Bradley), decreasing. Ethnic population: 10,000 (Bradley 2007b). Total users in all countries: 450. Status: 7 (Shifting). Alternate Names: Anoong, Anu, Anung, Fuchve, Fuch’ye, Khingpang, Kwingsang, Kwinp’ang, Naw, Nawpha, Nu. Dialects: Slightly di㨽erent dialects of Anong spoken in China and Myanmar, although no reported diഡculty communicating with each other. Low inherent intelligibility with the Matwang variety of Rawang [raw]. Lexical similarity: 87%–89% with Anong in Myanmar and Anong in China, 73%–76% with T’rung [duu], 77%–83% with Matwang variety of Rawang [raw]. Classi囕cation: Sino-Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman, Central Tibeto-Burman, Nungish. Comments: Di㨽erent from Nung (Tai family) of Viet Nam, Laos, and China, and from Chinese Nung (Cantonese) of Viet Nam.
    [Show full text]
  • Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics No. 14: Tibeto-Bvrman Languages of the Himalayas
    PACIFIC LINGUISTICS Series A-86 PAPERS IN SOUTHEAST ASIAN LINGUISTICS NO. 14: TIBETO-BVRMAN LANGUAGES OF THE HIMALAYAS edited by David Bradley Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Bradley, D. editor. Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics No. 14:. A-86, vi + 232 (incl. 4 maps) pages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1997. DOI:10.15144/PL-A86.cover ©1997 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative. Pacific Linguistics specialises in publishing linguistic material relating to languages of East Asia, Southeast Asia and the Pacific. Linguistic and anthropological manuscripts related to other areas, and to general theoretical issues, are also considered on a case by case basis. Manuscripts are published in one of four series: SERIES A: Occasional Papers SERIES C: Books SERIES B: Monographs SERIES D: Special Publications FOUNDING EDITOR: S.A. Wurm EDITORIAL BOARD: M.D. Ross and D.T. Tryon (Managing Editors), T.E. Dutton, N.P. Himmelmann, A.K. Pawley EDITORIAL ADVISERS: B.W. Bender KA. McElhanon University of Hawaii Summer Institute of Linguistics David Bradley H.P. McKaughan La Trobe University University of Hawaii Michael G. Clyne P. Miihlhausler Monash University Universityof Adelaide S.H. Elbert G.N. O'Grady University of Hawaii University of Victoria, B.C. K.J. Franklin KL. Pike Summer Institute of Linguistics Summer Institute of Linguistics W.W.Glover E.C. Polome Summer Institute of Linguistics University of Texas G.W.Grace Gillian Sankoff University of Hawaii University of Pennsylvania M.A.K.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BIBLIOGRAPHY of BURMA (MYANMAR) RESEARCH: the SECONDARY LITERATURE (2004 Revision)
    SOAS Bulletin of Burma Research Bibliographic Supplement (Winter, 2004) ISSN 1479- 8484 THE BIBLIOGRAPHY OF BURMA (MYANMAR) RESEARCH: THE SECONDARY LITERATURE (2004 Revision) Michael Walter Charney (comp.)1 School of Oriental and African Studies “The ‘Living’ Bibliography of Burma Studies: The Secondary Literature” was first published in 2001, with the last update dated 26 April 2003. The SOAS Bulletin of Burma Research has been expanded to include a special bibliographic supplement this year, and every other year hereafter, into which additions and corrections to the bibliography will be incorporated. In the interim, each issue of the SOAS Bulletin of Burma Research will include a supplemental list, arranged by topic and sub- topic. Readers are encouraged to contact the SOAS Bulletin of Burma Research with information about their publications, hopefully with a reference to a topic and sub-topic number for each entry, so that new information can be inserted into the bibliography correctly. References should be submitted in the form followed by the bibliography, using any of the entries as an example. Please note that any particular entry will only be included once, regardless of wider relevance. Eventually, all entries will be cross-listed to indicate other areas where a particular piece of research might be of use. This list has been compiled chiefly from direct surveys of the literature with additional information supplied by the bibliographies of numerous and various sources listed in the present bibliography. Additional sources include submissions from members of the BurmaResearch (including the former Earlyburma) and SEAHTP egroups, as well as public domain listings of personal publications on the internet.
    [Show full text]
  • 15-H Thangtungnung.Pmd
    Man In India, 94 (1-2) : 225-240 © Serials Publications ORIGIN AND MIGRATION OF THE ZO PEOPLE H. Thangtungnung North East India is a hotspot of identity crisis and ethnic divisions. The Chin, Kuki, Mizo and Zomi tribes who are collectively known as Zo are no exception. They have close cultural and religious affinities and a common ancestor called Zo. Historically, they have different theories of origin and migration based on their folklores, folktales and songs narrated down from one generation to another. The different origin theories like the Khul/Chhinlung or Cave origin theory, Chin Hills origin theory and Lost tribe (Manmasi) theory are among the most significant theories so far which speak to some extent, something about their history and origin. Of late, the Lost Tribe theory has become the most popular and convincing theory which claims that the Zo tribes are a ten lost tribes of Israel, specifically from the tribe of Manasseh. Israeli Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar had recognized them as descendents of Israel in 2005 which was also approved by the Israeli government. Many have consequently immigrated to the ‘Holy Land’. On this backdrop, it is worthwhile to study the fact about this claim. This article is an attempt to critically analyse and assess the debates about the different origin theories especially the lost tribe theory as the latest tendency. Based on evidences, the article also tries to support that the Zo people are a lost Manmasi tribe of Israel by substantiating various arguments to validate this origin theory. The Zos are the indigenous tribes of Manipur, Mizoram and Bangladesh.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Not Been Digitised by the British Library. for Any
    This thesis has not been digitised by the British Library. For any enquiries regarding the digitisation of this thesis contact the awarding institution directly. THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL NAMING A PEOPLE: BRITISH FRONTIER MANAGEMENT IN EASTERN BENGAL AND THE ETHNIC CATEGORIES OF THE KUKI-CHIN: 1760-1860 being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Hull by SOONG CHUL RO, MA.(Hull) MAY 2007 CONTENTS Page LIST OF MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS ...................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ............................................................................... vi PREFACE ................................................................................................................... vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................... viii ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................... ix GLOSSARY ..................................................................................................................... x CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 1 1. The Ethnic Categories of the Kuki-Chin People ......................................... 1 2. The History of the Kuki-Chin People in the Nineteenth Century ............ 19 3. Scope and Structure of the Thesis ............................................................. 31 CHAPTER 2 THE BEGINNING OF THE BRITISH
    [Show full text]
  • Burmese Population and Border Trade in Mizoram
    APRIL 2008 IPCS Research Papers TTeennssiioonn ii nn tthhee RRoolllliinngg HHiillllss:: Burmese populat ion and Border Trade in Mizoram JJulliieen LLeevveessqquue && Miirrzzaa ZZuullffiiqquurr Raahhmmaann IInnsstittuuttee ooff PPeeaaccee aanndd CCoonnfflliicctt SSttuudiieess NNeeww DDee-l li hh- ii,, IINNDDIIAA © 2007, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies is not responsible for the facts, views or opinion expressed by the author. The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS), established in August 1996, is an independent think tank devoted to research on peace and security from a South Asian perspective. Its aim is to develop a comprehensive and alternative framework for peace and security in the region catering to the changing demands of national, regional and global security. Address: B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor Safdarjung Enclave New Delhi 110029 INDIA Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 4165 2560 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ipcs.org CONTENTS Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................. 3 Burmese Population in Mizoram.............................................................................................................. 5 Border Trade ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • “The 'Living' Bibliography of Burma Studies
    Michael W. Charney (SOAS)* “The ‘Living’ Bibliography of Burma Studies: The Secondary Literature.” London: Revised. September 2002. Date of Current Revision: 26 September 2002 *Significant help was provided by Ken Breazeale, Joerg Schendel, Wil Dijk, and others. Organization of Entries: These entries will gradually be annotated. They are grouped as follows: PART I: BURMA TO 1948 (I) Archaeology and Pre-Pagan Era 8 A. General 8 B. Upper Burma 8 C. Lower Burma & the Pyu 9 D. Western Burma 9 (II) General Histories (Pagan era to 1947) 11 A. Broad Surveys 11 B. History of Administration 12 C. Sasana Reform 13 D. History of Technologies 13 (III) Pagan Period 15 A. General 15 B. Upper Burma 15 C. Lower Burma & the Mons 18 D. Western Burma 19 (IV) Early Modern Period (1350-1756) 20 A. State Formation and Administration 20 B. Culture and Religion 20 C. Law & Concepts 21 D. Bayìn-naung 21 E. Ethnic Relations 22 F. Foreign Impact and Relations 22 1. The Chinese 22 2. The Europeans 22 3. Bengal 24 4. Sri Lanka 25 5. Thailand 26 G. Arakan 26 Charney (comp.) 2 H. Miscellaneous 28 (V) Kòn-baung Dynasty 29 A. General 29 B. Court Life 29 C. Administration 30 D. Law & Legal Theory 31 E. Economy 32 F. Religion 32 1. Buddhism 32 2. Christianity 32 G. Individual Reigns 33 1. Bagyidaw 33 2. Mindon 33 3. Thibaw 34 H. Foreign Relations 34 1. General 34 2. China 34 3. France 35 4. Great Britain 35 5. Vietnam 36 (VI) Colonial Period 37 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory of a Lost Past, Memory of Rape : Nostalgia, Trauma and the Construction of Collective Social Memory Among the Zo Hnahthlak
    Memory Of A Lost Past, Memory Of Rape : Nostalgia, Trauma And The Construction Of Collective Social Memory Among The Zo Hnahthlak Anup Shekhar Chakraborty Résumé Mémoire d’un passé révolu, mémoire du viol : nostalgie, traumatisme et construction de la mémoire collective des Zo Hnahthlak La mémoire collective sociale est la force motrice de toutes les méta récits de l’identité nationale, elle est à l’origine du mouvement, que ceux ci soient composés de bons moments ou de mauvais moments. En fait, les souvenirs sont des objets qui se ruent de façon inattendue hors de l’esprit, reliant le présent avec le passé. Le lien entre les personnes, le patrimoine, le territoire et l’État est constitué par l’utilisation de métaphores botaniques. Le Zo / Mizo ou Zomi utilisent l’image d’un arbre pour lier leurs racines avec le territoire revendiqué, ils prétendent que leurs chansons et leurs folklores parlent d’un grand arbre, le Khampat Bungpui (ou Banyan), planté par leurs ancêtres avant leur migration à partir du village Zopui, à l’ouest de la vallée de TiAu au Myanmar. La mémoire du village Zopui, symbole de la grandeur de l’histoire des Zo est le fil conducteur de la mémoire sociale de la communauté Zo Hnahthlak. Les horreurs de l’insurrection et de la contre-insurrection, les viols massifs de femmes et d’abus de mineurs restent intégrés dans la mémoire sociale de la population Zo / Mizo. Cette contribution étudie la question épineuse de l’enracinement de la mémoire et du traumatisme dans l’identité des Zo Hnahthlak.
    [Show full text]