Firefly 8.0.0 Manual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Firefly 8.0.0 Manual Firefly 8.0.0 manual Version 2013-11-12 Table of Contents Introduction About this manual Overview of capabilities Firefly and GAMESS (US) Release history Citing Firefly Installing and running Firefly General information Windows Windows MPI implementations Windows and CUDA Linux Linux MPI implementations Linux and CUDA Installing Firefly on 64-bit Linux cluster with InfiniBand network and Intel MPI Command line options Creating an input file Input file structure Chemical control data Computer related control data Formatted input sections Input checking Input preprocessing Performance Introduction 64-bit processing support The P2P communication interface The XP and extended XP parallel modes of execution Utilizing HyperThreading CUDA The Fastdiag dynamic library Fast two-electron integrals code Quantum fast multipole method Output Main output The PUNCH file The IRCDATA file The MCQD files - 1 - Restart capabilities Coordinate types Introduction Cartesian coordinates Z-Matrix and natural internal coordinates Delocalized coordinates Utilizing symmetry Isotopic substitution Basis sets Introduction Built-in basis sets Using pure spherical polarization functions Using an external basis set file Manually specifying a basis set Using effective core potentials Partial linear dependence in a basis set Basis set superposition error (BSSE) correction Starting orbitals General accuracy switches Semi-empirical methods Introduction Available methods Hartree-Fock theory Introduction Restricted Hartree-Fock Unrestricted Hartree-Fock Restricted-open Hartree-Fock Direct vs conventional Convergence options General valence bond Introduction Open-shell SCF with GVB True GVB perfect pairing runs The special case of TCSCF A caution about symmetry Møller-Plesset correlation corrections Introduction MP2 calculations Performance of the MP2 code MP3 and MP4 calculations Density Functional Theory Introduction Available functionals Making modifications to functionals Empirical dispersion correction (DFT-D) - 2 - Time-Dependent Theories General information Excited state calculations with TDHF (RPA) Excited state calculations with TDDFT Configuration Interaction methods Introduction CI singles Higher-order CI Multi-configurational SCF methods Introduction Orbital optimization options Determinants vs CSFs Determinant CI code (ALDET) CSF CI code (GUGA) Performance Performing state-specific MCSCF calculations Performing state-averaged MCSCF calculations MCSCF state-tracking Strategies for selecting an MCSCF active space Multireference configuration interaction (Extended) Multi-configurational quasi-degenerate perturbation theory Introduction Overview of MCQDPT The XMCQDPT theory XMCQDPT vs XMS-CASPT2 Useful hints and best practices References Geometry optimizations Introduction Optimizations towards a minimum The Hessian Optimizations towards a transition state Optimizations and symmetry Mode following Constrained optimization Locating Conical Intersections (CIs) and Interstate Crossings (ISCs) Using numerical gradients Non-gradient total energy minimizations Hessian calculations General information Vibrational data Thermochemistry Raman activities Potential energy surface scans Rigid PES scans Relaxed PES scans - 3 - Reaction coordinate scans Intrinsic reaction coordinate Dynamic reaction coordinate Gradient extremal following Solvation models Self-consistent reaction field Polarizable continuum model Effective fragment potentials Calculating single geometry properties Introduction Electrostatic moments, electrostatic potential, electron density, electrostatic field, and electric field gradient Cube files Radiative transition moment Polarizabilities Spin-orbit coupling Stone's distributed multipole analysis Additional capabilities Orbital localization The NBO program Morokuma energy decomposition Interfacing with other programs Keyword list - 4 - Introduction About this manual The goal of this manual is to provide users with a description of all capa- bilities of the Firefly QC software package. It consists of two parts: a multi-chapter document that describes Firefly’s core functionality and a list of all keywords that are available in Firefly. The main document provides an overview of all important functionality pre- sent in Firefly. It deals with several theories and calculation types and, in addition, explains also how to set up Firefly in both Windows and Linux environments. It is intended for users new to Firefly (or new to a specific feature in Firefly) and assumes a basic to moderate level of QC knowledge. However, as this document contains several tips, users with a higher level of knowledge might also find this document useful. Note that as only an overview of Firefly’s functionality is provided, many of the less important (but not necessarily less useful) keywords are not discussed here. Instead, these can be found in the list of keywords. The list of keywords provides a complete listing of all options accessible in Firefly. This document contains very specific information for each fea- ture in Firefly and will foremost be useful to the more experienced users. However, beginning users are also encouraged to read through the list – they might come across some useful keywords not mentioned in the main docu- ment. In the list, keywords are organized by the keyword group (e.g. $CON- TRL, $SYSTEM, etc.) they belong to. The list is also available as a sepa- rate PDF document for the quick lookup of keywords. This manual is freely available from the Firefly website and falls under the copyright policy of the Firefly website. It may not be printed or re- published without the explicit permission of the copyright holder. Overview of capabilities The table below summarizes the current main capabilities of Firefly: Wavefunction RHF UHF ROHF GVB MCSCF Semiempirical SCF dm dm dm dm - SCF energy cdp cdp cdp cdp cdp SCF analytical gradient cdp cdp cdp cdp cdp SCF analytical Hessian cdp* - cdp* cdp* - DFT energy cdp cdp cdp - - DFT analytical gradient cdp cdp cdp - - CIS energy cdp - - - - - 5 - CIS analytical gradient cdp - - - - TDHF (RPA) energy cdp - - - - TDDFT energy cdp - - - - MP2 energy cdp cdp cdp - cdmp MP2 analytical gradient cdp - - - - MP3 energy cdm - - - - MP4 energy cdmp* - - - - CI energy cdp - cdp cdp cdp CI analytical gradient cd* - - - - Legend: c - conventional d - direct/semidirect m - multithreaded p - parallel * - additional notes: - CI analytical gradients and SCF analytical Hessians are programmed for spd basis sets only (note that CIS gradi- ents are available for any supported basis sets); - For GVB, SCF analytical Hessians are available only for a selected subset of possible GVB-type wavefunctions; - The MP4(SDQ) code is multithreaded but not parallel while the MP4(SDTQ) code is both multithreaded and paral- lel for (T) part. Firefly and GAMESS (US) Due to historical reasons, Firefly and GAMESS (US) share a lot of function- ality. When the Firefly project started in 1993 at MSU, it was based on the source code of the GAMESS (US) package developed by members of Mark Gor- don's group at ISU. Modifications to the source code were made by Alex Granovsky (who at that time was working at MSU), and the modified package was known as “PC GAMESS”. Initially, PC GAMESS was only available locally at MSU, but in 1997 it became available outside of MSU as part of the pub- lic GAMESS (US) distribution. Up until 1999, features added to GAMESS (US) were also incorporated in PC GAMESS. The latest release of GAMESS (US) of which the source code was used is the October 25th, 1999 release. After this release, the development of PC GAMESS and GAMESS (US) became independent. However, PC GAMESS did remain part of the GAMESS (US) distribution and a certain degree of compatibility between the two packages was maintained. With the release of version 7.1.C in 2008, PC GAMESS became completely forked from GAMESS (US) as an inde- pendent package and the name was changed to “Firefly” (though the PC GAMESS name was also used till the release of version 7.1.G). An overview of similarities and differences between Firefly and GAMESS (US) is given below. Similarities with GAMESS (US) Firefly supports all functionalities of GAMESS (US) up to the October 25th, 1999 release of GAMESS (US). Many additional features added to GAMESS (US) - 6 - since 1999 are supported as well. Ab initio SCF wavefunctions for RHF, UHF, ROHF, GVB and MCSCF cases are available. Correlation corrections include configuration interaction (CI) and Møller-Plesset (MP) perturbation theory. For MCSCF wavefunctions, correlation corrections can be calculated with MCQDPT2. Excited electronic states can also be described with configuration interaction with singles (CIS), RPA (i.e. TDHF), and TDDFT. Support for effective core potentials and a variety of density functional (DFT) func- tionals is available. Geometry optimizations can be performed with analyti- cal gradients at the HF, MP2, CI, DFT, and MCSCF levels. Analytical Hessi- ans can be computed for RHF, ROHF and GVB wavefunctions while numerical Hessians are available for all methods that support analytic gradients. Finally, numerical gradients and double-numerical Hessians are available for all methods. Differences with GAMESS (US) Firefly provides fast and efficient algorithms for Møller-Plesset second, third, and fourth order energy corrections. The DFT code in the Firefly is completely different with respect to that of GAMESS (US) and the two pro- grams support different density functionals. In Firefly, MCSCF gradients can be calculated semi-numerically
Recommended publications
  • Mercury 2.4 User Guide and Tutorials 2011 CSDS Release
    Mercury 2.4 User Guide and Tutorials 2011 CSDS Release Copyright © 2010 The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre Registered Charity No 800579 Conditions of Use The Cambridge Structural Database System (CSD System) comprising all or some of the following: ConQuest, Quest, PreQuest, Mercury, (Mercury CSD and Materials module of Mercury), VISTA, Mogul, IsoStar, SuperStar, web accessible CSD tools and services, WebCSD, CSD Java sketcher, CSD data file, CSD-UNITY, CSD-MDL, CSD-SDfile, CSD data updates, sub files derived from the foregoing data files, documentation and command procedures (each individually a Component) is a database and copyright work belonging to the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) and its licensors and all rights are protected. Use of the CSD System is permitted solely in accordance with a valid Licence of Access Agreement and all Components included are proprietary. When a Component is supplied independently of the CSD System its use is subject to the conditions of the separate licence. All persons accessing the CSD System or its Components should make themselves aware of the conditions contained in the Licence of Access Agreement or the relevant licence. In particular: • The CSD System and its Components are licensed subject to a time limit for use by a specified organisation at a specified location. • The CSD System and its Components are to be treated as confidential and may NOT be disclosed or re- distributed in any form, in whole or in part, to any third party. • Software or data derived from or developed using the CSD System may not be distributed without prior written approval of the CCDC.
    [Show full text]
  • Semiempirical Implementations of Molecular
    Semiempirical Implementations of Molecular Orbital Theory How one can make Hartree-Fock theory less computationally intensive without much sacrificing its accuracy? The most demanding step – calculation of two-electron (four-index) integrals (J and K integrals) appearing in the Fock matrix elements (N4 where N is the number of basis functions). One way to save time – to estimate their value accurately in an a priori fashion and thus to avoid numerical integration. Coulomb integrals measure the repulsion between electrons in regions of space defined by the basis functions. When the basis functions in the integral for one electron are very far from the basis functions for the other, the value of that integral will approach zero. In a large molecule, one might be able to avoid the calculation of a very large number of integrals simply by assuming them to be zero. HF theory is intrinsically inaccurate as it does not include correlation energy. Therefore, modifications of the theory introduced in order to simplify its formalism may actually improve it, provided the new approximations somehow introduce an accounting for correlation energy. Most typically, such approximations involve the adoption of a parametric form for some aspect of the calculation where the parameters involved are chosen so as best reproduce experimental data – ‘semiempirical’. Another motivation for introducing semiempirical approximation into HF theory was to facilitate the computation of derivatives (gradients, Hessians) so that geometries could be more efficiently optimized. Extended Hückel Theory Before considering semiempirical methods we revisit Hückel theory: H11 − ES11 H12 − ES12 L H1N − ES1N H21 − ES21 H22 − ES22 L H2N − ES2N = 0 M M O M H − ES H − ES H − ES N1 N1 N2 N 2 L NN NN The dimension of the secular determinant depends on the choice of the basis set.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Tools for Computational Chemical Dynamics
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Integrated Tools for Computational Chemical Dynamics • Developpp powerful simulation methods and incorporate them into a user- friendly high-throughput integrated software su ite for c hem ica l d ynami cs New Models (Methods) → Modules → Integrated Tools UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Development of new methods for the calculation of potential energy surface UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Development of new simulation methods UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Applications and Validations UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Electronic Software structu re Dynamics ANT QMMM GCMC MN-GFM POLYRATE GAMESSPLUS MN-NWCHEMFM MN-QCHEMFM HONDOPLUS MN-GSM Interfaces GaussRate JaguarRate NWChemRate UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Electronic Structure Software QMMM 1.3: QMMM is a computer program for combining quantum mechanics (QM) and molecular mechanics (MM). MN-GFM 3.0: MN-GFM is a module incorporating Minnesota DFT functionals into GAUSSIAN 03. MN-GSM 626.2:MN: MN-GSM is a module incorporating the SMx solvation models and other enhancements into GAUSSIAN 03. MN-NWCHEMFM 2.0:MN-NWCHEMFM is a module incorporating Minnesota DFT functionals into NWChem 505.0. MN-QCHEMFM 1.0: MN-QCHEMFM is a module incorporating Minnesota DFT functionals into Q-CHEM. GAMESSPLUS 4.8: GAMESSPLUS is a module incorporating the SMx solvation models and other enhancements into GAMESS. HONDOPLUS 5.1: HONDOPLUS is a computer program incorporating the SMx solvation models and other photochemical diabatic states into HONDO. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DiSftDynamics Software ANT 07: ANT is a molecular dynamics program for performing classical and semiclassical trajjyectory simulations for adiabatic and nonadiabatic processes. GCMC: GCMC is a Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) module for the simulation of adsorption isotherms in heterogeneous catalysts.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for RSC Advances. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 Supporting Information How to Select Ionic Liquids as Extracting Agent Systematically? Special Case Study for Extractive Denitrification Process Shurong Gaoa,b,c,*, Jiaxin Jina,b, Masroor Abroc, Ruozhen Songc, Miao Hed, Xiaochun Chenc,* a State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China b Research Center of Engineering Thermophysics, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China c Beijing Key Laboratory of Membrane Science and Technology & College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, PR China d Office of Laboratory Safety Administration, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China * Corresponding author, Tel./Fax: +86-10-6443-3570, E-mail: gaoshurong@ncepu.edu.cn, chenxc@mail.buct.edu.cn 1 COSMO-RS Computation COSMOtherm allows for simple and efficient processing of large numbers of compounds, i.e., a database of molecular COSMO files; e.g. the COSMObase database. COSMObase is a database of molecular COSMO files available from COSMOlogic GmbH & Co KG. Currently COSMObase consists of over 2000 compounds including a large number of industrial solvents plus a wide variety of common organic compounds. All compounds in COSMObase are indexed by their Chemical Abstracts / Registry Number (CAS/RN), by a trivial name and additionally by their sum formula and molecular weight, allowing a simple identification of the compounds. We obtained the anions and cations of different ILs and the molecular structure of typical N-compounds directly from the COSMObase database in this manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Babel Documentation Release 2.3.1
    Open Babel Documentation Release 2.3.1 Geoffrey R Hutchison Chris Morley Craig James Chris Swain Hans De Winter Tim Vandermeersch Noel M O’Boyle (Ed.) December 05, 2011 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Goals of the Open Babel project ..................................... 3 1.2 Frequently Asked Questions ....................................... 4 1.3 Thanks .................................................. 7 2 Install Open Babel 9 2.1 Install a binary package ......................................... 9 2.2 Compiling Open Babel .......................................... 9 3 obabel and babel - Convert, Filter and Manipulate Chemical Data 17 3.1 Synopsis ................................................. 17 3.2 Options .................................................. 17 3.3 Examples ................................................. 19 3.4 Differences between babel and obabel .................................. 21 3.5 Format Options .............................................. 22 3.6 Append property values to the title .................................... 22 3.7 Filtering molecules from a multimolecule file .............................. 22 3.8 Substructure and similarity searching .................................. 25 3.9 Sorting molecules ............................................ 25 3.10 Remove duplicate molecules ....................................... 25 3.11 Aliases for chemical groups ....................................... 26 4 The Open Babel GUI 29 4.1 Basic operation .............................................. 29 4.2 Options .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GROMACS: Fast, Flexible, and Free
    GROMACS: Fast, Flexible, and Free DAVID VAN DER SPOEL,1 ERIK LINDAHL,2 BERK HESS,3 GERRIT GROENHOF,4 ALAN E. MARK,4 HERMAN J. C. BERENDSEN4 1Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 596, S-75124 Uppsala, Sweden 2Stockholm Bioinformatics Center, SCFAB, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden 3Max-Planck Institut fu¨r Polymerforschung, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128 Mainz, Germany 4Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, NL-9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands Received 12 February 2005; Accepted 18 March 2005 DOI 10.1002/jcc.20291 Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). Abstract: This article describes the software suite GROMACS (Groningen MAchine for Chemical Simulation) that was developed at the University of Groningen, The Netherlands, in the early 1990s. The software, written in ANSI C, originates from a parallel hardware project, and is well suited for parallelization on processor clusters. By careful optimization of neighbor searching and of inner loop performance, GROMACS is a very fast program for molecular dynamics simulation. It does not have a force field of its own, but is compatible with GROMOS, OPLS, AMBER, and ENCAD force fields. In addition, it can handle polarizable shell models and flexible constraints. The program is versatile, as force routines can be added by the user, tabulated functions can be specified, and analyses can be easily customized. Nonequilibrium dynamics and free energy determinations are incorporated. Interfaces with popular quantum-chemical packages (MOPAC, GAMES-UK, GAUSSIAN) are provided to perform mixed MM/QM simula- tions. The package includes about 100 utility and analysis programs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alexandria Library, a Quantum-Chemical Database of Molecular Properties for Force field Development 9 2017 Received: October 1 1 1 Mohammad M
    www.nature.com/scientificdata OPEN Data Descriptor: The Alexandria library, a quantum-chemical database of molecular properties for force field development 9 2017 Received: October 1 1 1 Mohammad M. Ghahremanpour , Paul J. van Maaren & David van der Spoel Accepted: 19 February 2018 Published: 10 April 2018 Data quality as well as library size are crucial issues for force field development. In order to predict molecular properties in a large chemical space, the foundation to build force fields on needs to encompass a large variety of chemical compounds. The tabulated molecular physicochemical properties also need to be accurate. Due to the limited transparency in data used for development of existing force fields it is hard to establish data quality and reusability is low. This paper presents the Alexandria library as an open and freely accessible database of optimized molecular geometries, frequencies, electrostatic moments up to the hexadecupole, electrostatic potential, polarizabilities, and thermochemistry, obtained from quantum chemistry calculations for 2704 compounds. Values are tabulated and where available compared to experimental data. This library can assist systematic development and training of empirical force fields for a broad range of molecules. Design Type(s) data integration objective • molecular physical property analysis objective Measurement Type(s) physicochemical characterization Technology Type(s) Computational Chemistry Factor Type(s) Sample Characteristic(s) 1 Uppsala Centre for Computational Chemistry, Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, Box 596, SE-75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to D.v.d.S. (email: david.vanderspoel@icm.uu.se).
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Construction of Quantum–Classical Hybrid Models Arxiv:2102.09355V1 [Physics.Chem-Ph] 18 Feb 2021
    Automated construction of quantum{classical hybrid models Christoph Brunken and Markus Reiher∗ ETH Z¨urich, Laboratorium f¨urPhysikalische Chemie, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Z¨urich, Switzerland February 18, 2021 Abstract We present a protocol for the fully automated construction of quantum mechanical-(QM){ classical hybrid models by extending our previously reported approach on self-parametri- zing system-focused atomistic models (SFAM) [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16 (3), 1646{1665]. In this QM/SFAM approach, the size and composition of the QM region is evaluated in an automated manner based on first principles so that the hybrid model describes the atomic forces in the center of the QM region accurately. This entails the au- tomated construction and evaluation of differently sized QM regions with a bearable com- putational overhead that needs to be paid for automated validation procedures. Applying SFAM for the classical part of the model eliminates any dependence on pre-existing pa- rameters due to its system-focused quantum mechanically derived parametrization. Hence, QM/SFAM is capable of delivering a high fidelity and complete automation. Furthermore, since SFAM parameters are generated for the whole system, our ansatz allows for a con- venient re-definition of the QM region during a molecular exploration. For this purpose, a local re-parametrization scheme is introduced, which efficiently generates additional clas- sical parameters on the fly when new covalent bonds are formed (or broken) and moved to the classical region. arXiv:2102.09355v1 [physics.chem-ph] 18 Feb 2021 ∗Corresponding author; e-mail: markus.reiher@phys.chem.ethz.ch 1 1 Introduction In contrast to most protocols of computational quantum chemistry that consider isolated molecules, chemical processes can take place in a vast variety of complex environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Chem Compute Quickstart
    Chem Compute Quickstart Chem Compute is maintained by Mark Perri at Sonoma State University and hosted on Jetstream at Indiana University. The Chem Compute URL is https://chemcompute.org/. We will use Chem Compute as the frontend for running electronic structure calculations with The General Atomic and Molecular Electronic Structure System, GAMESS (http://www.msg.ameslab.gov/gamess/). Chem Compute also provides access to other computational chemistry resources including PSI4 and the molecular dynamics packages TINKER and NAMD, though we will not be using those resource at this time. Follow this link, https://chemcompute.org/gamess/submit, to directly access the Chem Compute GAMESS guided submission interface. If you are a returning Chem Computer user, please log in now. If your University is part of the InCommon Federation you can log in without registering by clicking Login then "Log In with Google or your University" – select your University from the dropdown list. Otherwise if this is your first time working with Chem Compute, please register as a Chem Compute user by clicking the “Register” link in the top-right corner of the page. This gives you access to all of the computational resources available at ChemCompute.org and will allow you to maintain copies of your calculations in your user “Dashboard” that you can refer to later. Registering also helps track usage and obtain the resources needed to continue providing its service. When logged in with the GAMESS-Submit tabs selected, an instruction section appears on the left side of the page with instructions for several different kinds of calculations.
    [Show full text]
  • An Efficient Hardware-Software Approach to Network Fault Tolerance with Infiniband
    An Efficient Hardware-Software Approach to Network Fault Tolerance with InfiniBand Abhinav Vishnu1 Manoj Krishnan1 and Dhableswar K. Panda2 Pacific Northwest National Lab1 The Ohio State University2 Outline Introduction Background and Motivation InfiniBand Network Fault Tolerance Primitives Hybrid-IBNFT Design Hardware-IBNFT and Software-IBNFT Performance Evaluation of Hybrid-IBNFT Micro-benchmarks and NWChem Conclusions and Future Work Introduction Clusters are observing a tremendous increase in popularity Excellent price to performance ratio 82% supercomputers are clusters in June 2009 TOP500 rankings Multiple commodity Interconnects have emerged during this trend InfiniBand, Myrinet, 10GigE …. InfiniBand has become popular Open standard and high performance Various topologies have emerged for interconnecting InfiniBand Fat tree is the predominant topology TACC Ranger, PNNL Chinook 3 Typical InfiniBand Fat Tree Configurations 144-Port Switch Block Diagram Multiple leaf and spine blocks 12 Spine Available in 144, 288 and 3456 port Blocks combinations 12 Leaf Blocks Multiple paths are available between nodes present on different switch blocks Oversubscribed configurations are becoming popular 144-Port Switch Block Diagram Better cost to performance ratio 12 Spine Blocks 12 Spine 12 Spine Blocks Blocks 12 Leaf 12 Leaf Blocks Blocks 4 144-Port Switch Block Diagram 144-Port Switch Block Diagram Network Faults Links/Switches/Adapters may fail with reduced MTBF (Mean time between failures) Fortunately, InfiniBand provides mechanisms to handle
    [Show full text]
  • Semiempirical Quantum-Chemical Methods Max-Planck-Institut Für
    Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 4, 145-157 (2014), which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1161. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self- Archived Versions. Semiempirical quantum-chemical methods Walter Thiel Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung Kaiser-Wilhelm-Platz 1, 45470 Mülheim, Germany thiel@kofo.mpg.de Abstract The semiempirical methods of quantum chemistry are reviewed, with emphasis on established NDDO-based methods (MNDO, AM1, PM3) and on the more recent orthogonalization-corrected methods (OM1, OM2, OM3). After a brief historical overview, the methodology is presented in non- technical terms, covering the underlying concepts, parameterization strategies, and computational aspects, as well as linear scaling and hybrid approaches. The application section addresses selected recent benchmarks and surveys ground-state and excited-state studies, including recent OM2- based excited-state dynamics investigations. Introduction Quantum mechanics provides the conceptual framework for understanding chemistry and the theoretical foundation for computational methods that model the electronic structure of chemical compounds. There are three types of such approaches: Quantum-chemical ab initio methods provide a convergent path to the exact solution of the Schrödinger equation and can therefore give “the right answer for the right reason”, but they are costly and thus restricted to relatively small molecules (at least in the case of the highly accurate correlated approaches). Density functional theory (DFT) has become the workhorse of computational chemistry because of its favourable price/performance ratio, allowing for fairly accurate calculations on medium-size molecules, but there is no systematic path of improvement in spite of the first-principles character of DFT.
    [Show full text]
  • Universit`A Di Parma
    UNIVERSITA` DI PARMA DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY, LIFE SCIENCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY Doctoral Programme in Chemical Sciences XXIX Cycle DYES AND NANOPARTICLES FOR 2PA APPLICATIONS: MODELS AND COMPUTATIONS PhD Student: Somananda Sanyal Supervisors: Prof. Anna Painelli Prof. Swapan K. Pati Coordinator: Prof. Roberto Corradini 2014-2017 Dedicated to My Family List of Abbreviations BFC BF2 complex of Curcumin CT Charge Transfer CNT Carbon Nanotubes D/A Electron Donor / Acceptor 0 DANS p,p -dimethylamino-nitrostilbene DFT Density Functional Theory DMRG Density Matrix Renormalization Group Theory eV electron-volt unit ESM Essential State Model ESP Electrostatic Potential FMO Frontier Molecular Orbital GM G¨oppert-Mayer units (1GM ≡ 10−50 cm 4 s photon−1) HOMO Highest Occupied Molecular Orbital HRS Hyper Rayleigh Scattering LUMO Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital MO Molecular Orbital OPA One Photon Absorption PCM Polarizable Continuum Model PPP Pariser-Parr-Pople TPA Two Photon Absorption ZINDO Zerner's Intermediate Neglect of Differential Overlap i Acknowledgements It's time to say Thank You to many people who have either actively or silently been supporting me in successfully completing the PhD thesis! These three years of my PhD tenure in Parma, Italy has been an eye opener for me, as I slowly learnt to adapt as a girl in a new city. I have been extremely fortunate to meet some people whose influence has been profound and worth cherishing, and I want to grab this opportunity to Thank them All! My parents have been my biggest support system throughout my life and from them I have learnt the first lessons of morality and humanity.
    [Show full text]