A Review and Synthesis of Australian Fisheries Habitat

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Review and Synthesis of Australian Fisheries Habitat See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45256642 A Review and Synthesis of Australian Fisheries Habitat Research, Major Threats, Issues and Gaps in Knowledge of Coastal and Marine Fisheries Habitats - A Prospectus of Opportunitie... Article · January 1998 Source: OAI CITATIONS READS 24 244 4 authors, including: Daniel M. Alongi Norman C Duke Tropical Coastal & Mangrove Consultants James Cook University 217 PUBLICATIONS 15,835 CITATIONS 265 PUBLICATIONS 14,165 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: MangroveWatch - community science in action View project Large-scale dieback of mangroves in Australia's Gulf of Carpentaria: a severe ecosystem response, coincidental with an unusually extreme weather event View project All content following this page was uploaded by Norman C Duke on 14 December 2013. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. A REVIEW AND SYNTHESIS OF AUSTRALIAN FISHERIES HABITAT RESEARCH MAJOR THREATS, ISSUES AND GAPS IN KNOWLEDGE OF COASTAL AND MARINE FISHERIES HABITATS - A PROSPECTUS OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE FRDC “ECOSYSTEM PROTECTION PROGRAM” VOLUME 2: SCOPING REVIEW Mike Cappo, Daniel M. Alongi, David McB. Williams and Norman Duke PRODUCED AT THE REQUEST OF THE FISHERIES RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FRDC 95/055 AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE FEBRUARY 1998 Contents ISSUE 1: NATURAL DYNAMICS IN FISHERIES HABITATS AND ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABILITY 13 1.1 Overview and FRDC role 13 1.1.1 The issues 13 1.1.2 The literature 19 1.1.3 FRDC action 28 1.2 Major forcings shape habitat dynamics - currents, tides, geomorphology and climate 34 1.2.1 Effects of the environment on fisheries 44 1.2.2 The nature of disturbance 53 1.2.3 Fisheries ecosystem management, bioregionalisations and the National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas 53 1.3 Fisheries-habitat links 69 1.3.1 Key issues 69 1.3.2 Lack of regional overviews of pattern and process in fisheries production 71 1.3.3 The use of production figures in assessing the state of fisheries habitats 81 1.3.4 Lack of knowledge of links between life-histories and habitats 86 1.3.5 The concepts of “estuarine dependence”, “estuarine opportunism” and “critical habitats” 95 1.4 An overview of processes, connectivity and production in the major fisheries habitats 100 1.4.1 Coastal freshwater 101 1.4.1.1 Fishery-habitat links 104 1.4.2 Saltmarsh (and saltpan) 106 1.4.3 Mangroves 109 1.4.3.1 Fishery-habitat links 119 1.4.4 Seagrasses 121 1.4.4.1 Fishery-habitat links 132 1.4.5 Sheltered coasts and estuaries 138 1.4.5.1 Fishery-habitat links 142 3 FRDC 95/055: A Review and Synthesis of Australian Fisheries Habitat Research 1.4.6 Open coasts - sandy shores 160 1.4.6.1 Fishery-habitat links 163 1.4.7 Open coasts - hard substrata 166 1.4.7.1 Fishery-habitat links 167 1.4.8 Coral reefs 170 1.4.9 Continental shelves 172 1.4.9.1 Fishery-habitat links 174 ISSUE 2: CHANGES TO DRAINAGE AND HABITAT ALTERATION 177 2.1 Overview and FRDC role 177 2.1.1 The issues 177 2.1.2 The literature 181 2.1.3 FRDC action 185 2.2 Coastal floodplains and wetlands - most vulnerable habitats? 195 2.2.1 The acid sulfate soil problem 196 2.2.2 Wetland loss 200 2.3 Estuarine “Environmental Flows” of freshwater 206 2.3.1 Barriers and alienation of habitat 209 2.3.2 The need for FISHWAYS 215 2.4 Saline intrusion and salinisation of estuaries 216 2.5 Training walls and channel modifications alter tidal and wave forcing 218 2.5.1 Lagoon opening regimes - foregone fisheries production due to opening or closure 219 2.6 Canal estates 221 2.7 Sediment instability, seagrass dieback and “narrow-banding” 222 2.8 Habitat rehabilitation, restoration and creation 225 ISSUE 3: NUTRIENT AND CONTAMINANT INPUTS 241 3.1 Overview and FRDC role 241 3.1.1 The issues 241 3.1.2 The literature 246 3.1.3 FRDC action 253 3.2 Effects on ecosystems - seagrass dieback, algal blooms and the need for biomonitors 260 3.2.1 Regional variability 266 3.2.2 Biomonitors and the symptoms of eutrophication - the need for innovation 268 4 Contents 3.3 Effects on ecosystems - de-nitrification cycles and phytoplankton blooms 271 3.3.1 Mangroves as nutrient scrubbers 272 3.3.2 Key uncertainties 272 3.3.3 Toxic and nuisance phytoplankton blooms 274 3.4 Contaminants and pathogens 278 3.4.1 Hydrocarbons 278 3.4.2 Metal contamination 279 3.4.3 Organochlorines and organometals 281 3.4.4 Sewage plumes 282 ISSUE 4: EFFECTS OF HARVESTING ON BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEMS 285 4.1 Overview and FRDC role 285 4.1.1 The issues 285 4.1.2 The literature 286 4.1.3 FRDC action 291 4.2 Bycatch and incidental take 296 4.2.1 Gillnetting - interactions with “charismatic megafauna” and bycatch issues 297 4.2.2 Trawling and scallop dredging 300 4.2.3 Bycatch in other fisheries -- estuarine angling, trawling and pocket- netting -- bycatch of juveniles of important species 307 4.2.4 Shoreline harvesting 309 4.2.5 Bycatch in other fisheries - longlining 310 4.3 Habitat damage 311 4.4 Secondary effects of discards 315 4.5 Indirect effects of the reduction of target species and habitat damage 316 4.5.1 Species shifts on reefs 316 4.5.2 Indirect effects of the reduction of target species and habitat damage -- species shifts on trawl grounds 319 4.5.3 Indirect effects of the reduction of target species - competition with predators for food fishes 322 4.6 Changes in demography under fishing pressure 323 4.7 Generation of litter and the environmental consequences 324 4.8 Reducing the effects of fishing 325 4.9 Assessing the effects of fishing 328 5 FRDC 95/055: A Review and Synthesis of Australian Fisheries Habitat Research ISSUE 5: INTRODUCED AND TRANSLOCATED PESTS AND DISEASES 333 5.1 Overview and FRDC role 333 5.1.1 The issues 333 5.1.2 The literature 340 5.1.3 FRDC action 343 5.2 Ballast water and hull-fouling organisms -- ship-vectored threats to mariculture and temperate fisheries habitats 346 5.2.1 Toxic and nuisance dinoflagellate blooms - a threat to mariculture 347 5.2.2 Marine pests that alter ecosystem structure 348 5.2.3 Disease 354 5.3 Translocated fishes and introduced pests in lower catchments 357 5.3.1 The role of habitat disturbance 357 5.3.2 Translocated fishes 360 5.3.3 Noxious aquatic macrophytes, woody weeds and pasture grasses 361 GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS 369 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Standing Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture - Fisheries Environment and Health Committee Terms of Reference (Hamdorf 1994) 373 Appendix 2: Fisheries Environment and Health Committee Research Priorities Draft (June 1996) see Hamdorf (1994) 374 Appendix 3: A Collation of Investment by THE FRDC in Projects with some Focus on Issues covered in this Review 377 Appendix 4: Summary of results of fisheries-habitat studies in inshore bays and estuaries, by Region, location, habitat type, fisheries taxa, life-history stage and source 393 Appendix 5: Summary of results of fisheries-habitat studies on rocky coasts and reefs, by region, location, habitat type, fisheries taxa, life-history stage and source. 418 Appendix 6 :Summary of results of fisheries-habitat studies on continental shelves, by region, location, habitat type, fisheries taxa, life-history stage and source. 431 6 Tables, Figures and Boxes Table 1.1.1 Breakdown of literature from the entire bibliography by number of papers containing specific information on natural dynamics and fisheries links. 20 Table 1.1.2 Breakdown of literature from the entire bibliography by number of papers containing specific information on natural dynamics and threats. 20 Table 1.1.3(a) Selected references documenting or invoking major sources of variation in fisheries-habitat links by habitat type. 25 Table 1.1.3(b) Selected references documenting or invoking major sources of variation in fisheries-habitat links by habitat type. 27 Table 1.1.4 Summary of Major Opportunities for FRDC investment in addressing R&D Gaps in knowledge of “Natural Dynamics”. 31 Table 1.2.1 Distribution of estuarine wetlands in tropical and subtropical Australia with extreme tide range. 35 Table 1.2.3.1 Descriptions for IMCRA regions. 61 Table 1.2.3.2 Examples of the detailed attribute data for IMCRA regions. 66 Table 1.3.2.1 Similarity in composition of major target families in nearshore fin- fisheries of Australia. 73 Table 1.3.2.2 Comparison of rank occurrence in numerical terms of taxa in studies done in estuarine and marine embayments at similar latitudes in southern Australia. 76 Table 1.3.2.3 Comparison of commercial and recreational catch (t yr-1) and production (kg Ha-1 yr-1) from Victorian, NSW and WA bays, inlets and estuaries. 79 7 FRDC 95/055: A Review and Synthesis of Australian Fisheries Habitat Research Table 1.3.2.4 Differences in area of habitat and estimated total (commercial + recreational) finfish production (tonnes) from the Clarence and Richmond Rivers. 80 Table 1.3.2.5 Comparison of biomass estimates (grams metre-2) from habitats within estuaries in the tropics and sub-tropics, using a variety of gears (see Appendix 4). 81 Table 1.3.4.1 Variation amongst species within genera, and within species amongst regions in requirements for nursery habitats.
Recommended publications
  • Conservation of Handfish and Their Habitats – Annual Report Tim Lynch, Tyson Bessell, Alexander Hormann, Carlie Devine and Neville Barrett
    Conservation of handfish and their habitats – annual report Tim Lynch, Tyson Bessell, Alexander Hormann, Carlie Devine and Neville Barrett Project A10 – Conservation of spotted handfish 28 February 2019 Milestone 4– Research Plan 4 (2018) www.nespmarine.edu.au Enquiries should be addressed to: Dr Tim P. Lynch Senior Research Scientist CSIRO Castray Esplanade [email protected] Project Leader’s Distribution List Derwent Estuary Program Ursula Taylor Zoo and Aquarium Association (ZAA) Craig Thorburn Natural Resource Management (NRM) Nepelle Crane South MAST Ian Ross Royal Yacht Club of Tasmania Nick Hutton Derwent Sailing Squadron Shaun Tiedemann The Handfish Recovery Team (HRT) See list below Marine and Freshwater Species Conservation Section Wildlife, Heritage and Marine Division Department of the Environment and Energy (DoEE) Threatened Species Policy and Andrew Crane Conservation Advice Branch Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE) Office of the Threatened Species Commissioner (DoEE) The project will also report its findings on a semi-annual basis to the National Handfish Recovery Team (NHRT) – see below. This is a governance body that is constituted between the Tasmanian State and the Commonwealth government with other interested parties: Department of the Environment and Energy (Commonwealth) Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Andrew Crane Environment (Tas) CSIRO scientist, running current surveys and substrate trials Tim Lynch (Chair) University of Tasmania, handfish research Neville
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Review of the Status of Seabirds at Long Island, Wallabi Group, Houtman Abrolhos
    Humfrey Land Developments Avifauna Field Survey January 2006 Citation. This report may be quoted as: Surman, C.A. (2006). Field Survey of Avifauna at Long Island, Wallabi Group, Houtman Abrolhos, September and December 2005. Unpublished report prepared for MBS by Halfmoon Biosciences. 33 pp. Submitted on: 30 January 2006 Prepared by: Dr Chris Surman Halfmoon Biosciences 14 Snook Crescent Hilton, W.A. 6163 [email protected] ©Copyright 2006 Halfmoon Biosciences This document and information contained in it has been prepared by Halfmoon Biosciences under the terms and conditions of his contract with his client. The report is for the client’s use only and may not be used, exploited, copied, duplicated or reproduced in any form or medium whatsoever without the prior written permission of Halfmoon Biosciences or their client. Halfmoon Biosciences i Humfrey Land Developments Avifauna Field Survey January 2006 Table of Contents 1 Introduction................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Nomenclature...................................................................................................... 2 2 Nesting Habitat ........................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Low Sand Dunes (plates 1-4).............................................................................. 3 2.2 Coral Ridges........................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Tidal
    [Show full text]
  • Download E-Book (PDF)
    African Journal of Biotechnology Volume 14 Number 33, 19 August, 2015 ISSN 1684-5315 ABOUT AJB The African Journal of Biotechnology (AJB) (ISSN 1684-5315) is published weekly (one volume per year) by Academic Journals. African Journal of Biotechnology (AJB), a new broad-based journal, is an open access journal that was founded on two key tenets: To publish the most exciting research in all areas of applied biochemistry, industrial microbiology, molecular biology, genomics and proteomics, food and agricultural technologies, and metabolic engineering. Secondly, to provide the most rapid turn-around time possible for reviewing and publishing, and to disseminate the articles freely for teaching and reference purposes. All articles published in AJB are peer- reviewed. Submission of Manuscript Please read the Instructions for Authors before submitting your manuscript. The manuscript files should be given the last name of the first author Click here to Submit manuscripts online If you have any difficulty using the online submission system, kindly submit via this email [email protected]. With questions or concerns, please contact the Editorial Office at [email protected]. Editor-In-Chief Associate Editors George Nkem Ude, Ph.D Prof. Dr. AE Aboulata Plant Breeder & Molecular Biologist Plant Path. Res. Inst., ARC, POBox 12619, Giza, Egypt Department of Natural Sciences 30 D, El-Karama St., Alf Maskan, P.O. Box 1567, Crawford Building, Rm 003A Ain Shams, Cairo, Bowie State University Egypt 14000 Jericho Park Road Bowie, MD 20715, USA Dr. S.K Das Department of Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology, University of Fukui, Japan Editor Prof. Okoh, A. I. N.
    [Show full text]
  • Congolli (Pseudaphritis Urvillii) and Australian Salmon (Arripis Truttaceus and A
    Inland Waters and Catchment Ecology Diet and trophic characteristics of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus), congolli (Pseudaphritis urvillii) and Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus and A. trutta) in the Coorong George Giatas and Qifeng Ye SARDI Publication No. F2015/000479-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 858 SARDI Aquatics Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 September 2015 Giatas and Ye (2015) Diet of three fish species in the Coorong Diet and trophic characteristics of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus), congolli (Pseudaphritis urvillii) and Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus and A. trutta) in the Coorong George Giatas and Qifeng Ye SARDI Publication No. F2015/000479-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 858 September 2015 II Giatas and Ye (2015) Diet of three fish species in the Coorong This publication may be cited as: Giatas, G.C. and Ye, Q. (2015). Diet and trophic characteristics of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus), congolli (Pseudaphritis urvillii) and Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus and A. trutta) in the Coorong. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2015/000479-1. SARDI Research Report Series No. 858. 81pp. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/research DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Research Chief, Aquatic Sciences. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • WA999 Wallabi Group
    999 WA HOUTMAN ABROLHOS - WALLABI GROUP WALLABI - ABROLHOS HOUTMAN SEE RELATED PUBLICATIONS: Notice to Mariners (http://www.transport.wa.gov.au/imarine/coastaldata/), Symbols, Abbreviations DEPTHS IN METRES and Terms (INT 1), Tide Tables, Sailing Directions. For surveys beyond this chart refer to RAN Charts AUS 83 and AUS 751. E= 7 52 000 E= 7 60 000 E= 7 68 000 E= 7 76 000 34' 35' 36' 37' 38' 39' 113°40' E 41' 42' 43' 44' 45' 46' 47' 48' 49' 52 46 44 43 42 44 28° 13' 24" S 51 49 113° 40' E Zone of Confidence (ZOC) Diagram 28° 13' 24" S 28° 13' 24" S HOUTMAN ABROLHOS AUSTRALIA - WEST COAST 50 48 43 CHART LAYOUT WESTERN AUSTRALIA 113° 49' 48" E 14’ 14’ 113° 49' 48" E 46 46 113° 49' 48" E 52 HOUTMAN ABROLHOS C 46 WALLABI GROUP 41 36 SCALE 1 : 50 000 000 44 72 44 46 68 DEPTHS 41 N= 23 44 Depths are shown in metres and decimetres, reduced to Sounding Datum, which is 15’ 35 approximately lowest water level. 15’ 21 B HEIGHTS Heights are shown in metres. Underlined figures are drying heights above Sounding 11 30 13 Datum. Overhead clearance heights are above Highest Astronomical Tide. All other 000 16 8 8 2 29 heights are above Mean Higher High Water. 72 128 C 68 62 POSITIONS 24 6 41 N= 6 Positions on this chart are referenced to the Map Grid of Australia, Zone 50, 18 43 Wallabi Group WA 999 Side A based on the Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994 (GDA94).
    [Show full text]
  • Potentially Useful Beach Nourishment and Associated Studies/Projects – References
    Sand Nourishment Forum – Sand Nourishment Reference list October 2013 Updated from Coasts & Ports Conference, Sydney 2013 Potentially Useful Beach Nourishment and Associated Studies/Projects – References Foreword: The Coasts & Ports 2013 Organising Committee introduced a half- day Sand Nourishment Forum comprising a Questions and Answers format directed to an experienced Panel with audience participation to explore and promote the use of sand nourishment as a viable method for managing short term erosion and long term coastal recession. The Forum emanated from great interest in beach nourishment around Australia, with a long history of successful projects from Adelaide to Noosa and major projects on the Gold Coast. The 2013 Conference was launched with a keynote address from Dr Stefan Aarninkhof who was intricately involved in the Delfland Sand Engine project in the Netherlands, which has introduced 21.5M m3 of offshore sands to the Dutch coast to provide coastal protection and prevent coastal inundation. As a precursor to the Beach Nourishment Forum at the Coast & Ports Conference 2013 in Sydney, A. D. Gordon (Forum Moderator) compiled the following list of reference material with contributions from J.T. Carley, E.D. Couriel, A. L. Jackson, A.R Jones, D.B. Lord, A.F. Nielsen, T.D. Shand, R.B. Tomlinson, T. Stul, R. Tucker. The list is intended to be a start on a “live “ document that can be added to, as further reference material becomes available/unearthed. The list has been compiled to assist those carrying out or contemplating beach nourishment, beach scraping and entrance by-passing or back-passing projects. It is hoped that other special interest topics to the coastal and port engineering profession may be run in similar forums as part of the future Coasts & Ports Conference series.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Development Information to Accompany
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TO ACCOMPANY DRAFT AMENDMENT NO.6 TO D’ENTRECASTEAUX CHANNEL MARINE FARMING DEVELOPMENT PLAN FEBRUARY 2002 PROPONENT: TASSAL OPERATIONS PTY LTD Glossary ADCP Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler AGD Amoebic Gill Disease ASC Aquaculture Stewardship Council BAP Best Aquaculture Practices BEMP Broadscale Environmental Monitoring Program CAMBA China-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement CEO Chief Executive Officer COBP Code of Best Practice CSER corporate, social and environmental responsibility CSIRO Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation DAFF Depart of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry dBA A-weighted decibels DMB Dry matter basis DO dissolved oxygen DPIW Department of Primary Industries and Water DPIPWE Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and the Environment EDO Environmental Defenders Office ENGOs environmental non-governmental organisations EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMS Environmental Management System EPA Environmental Protection Authority EPBCA Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 FCR Feed Conversion Ratio FHMP Fish Health Management Plan FSANZ Food Standards Australia New Zealand g gram GAA Global Aquaculture Alliance ha hectare HAB Harmful Algal Bloom HOG head on gutted HVN Huon Valley News IALA International Association of Lighthouse Authorities IMAS Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies i JAMBA Japan-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement kg kilogram km kilometre L litre LED light-emitting diode m metre mm millimetre MAST Marine and Safety
    [Show full text]
  • Reef Fishes of the Bird's Head Peninsula, West
    Check List 5(3): 587–628, 2009. ISSN: 1809-127X LISTS OF SPECIES Reef fishes of the Bird’s Head Peninsula, West Papua, Indonesia Gerald R. Allen 1 Mark V. Erdmann 2 1 Department of Aquatic Zoology, Western Australian Museum. Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Perth, Western Australia 6986. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Conservation International Indonesia Marine Program. Jl. Dr. Muwardi No. 17, Renon, Denpasar 80235 Indonesia. Abstract A checklist of shallow (to 60 m depth) reef fishes is provided for the Bird’s Head Peninsula region of West Papua, Indonesia. The area, which occupies the extreme western end of New Guinea, contains the world’s most diverse assemblage of coral reef fishes. The current checklist, which includes both historical records and recent survey results, includes 1,511 species in 451 genera and 111 families. Respective species totals for the three main coral reef areas – Raja Ampat Islands, Fakfak-Kaimana coast, and Cenderawasih Bay – are 1320, 995, and 877. In addition to its extraordinary species diversity, the region exhibits a remarkable level of endemism considering its relatively small area. A total of 26 species in 14 families are currently considered to be confined to the region. Introduction and finally a complex geologic past highlighted The region consisting of eastern Indonesia, East by shifting island arcs, oceanic plate collisions, Timor, Sabah, Philippines, Papua New Guinea, and widely fluctuating sea levels (Polhemus and the Solomon Islands is the global centre of 2007). reef fish diversity (Allen 2008). Approximately 2,460 species or 60 percent of the entire reef fish The Bird’s Head Peninsula and surrounding fauna of the Indo-West Pacific inhabits this waters has attracted the attention of naturalists and region, which is commonly referred to as the scientists ever since it was first visited by Coral Triangle (CT).
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Research of the Gobioid Fishes (Perciformes: Gobioidei) in China
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ICHTHYOLOGY, Vol. 21 Supplement, 63-72, July 2009 Received : April 17, 2009 ISSN: 1225-8598 Revised : June 15, 2009 Accepted : July 13, 2009 Taxonomic Research of the Gobioid Fishes (Perciformes: Gobioidei) in China By Han-Lin Wu, Jun-Sheng Zhong1,* and I-Shiung Chen2 Ichthyological Laboratory, Shanghai Ocean University, 999 Hucheng Ring Rd., 201306 Shanghai, China 1Ichthyological Laboratory, Shanghai Ocean University, 999 Hucheng Ring Rd., 201306 Shanghai, China 2Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202, Taiwan ABSTRACT The taxonomic research based on extensive investigations and specimen collections throughout all varieties of freshwater and marine habitats of Chinese waters, including mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan, which involved accounting the vast number of collected specimens, data and literature (both within and outside China) were carried out over the last 40 years. There are totally 361 recorded species of gobioid fishes belonging to 113 genera, 5 subfamilies, and 9 families. This gobioid fauna of China comprises 16.2% of 2211 known living gobioid species of the world. This report repre- sents a summary of previous researches on the suborder Gobioidei. A recently diagnosed subfamily, Polyspondylogobiinae, were assigned from the type genus and type species: Polyspondylogobius sinen- sis Kimura & Wu, 1994 which collected around the Pearl River Delta with high extremity of vertebral count up to 52-54. The undated comprehensive checklist of gobioid fishes in China will be provided in this paper. Key words : Gobioid fish, fish taxonomy, species checklist, China, Hong Kong, Taiwan INTRODUCTION benthic perciforms: gobioid fishes to evolve and active- ly radiate. The fishes of suborder Gobioidei belong to the largest The gobioid fishes in China have long received little group of those in present living Perciformes.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Storms in Nsw and Their Effect on the Coast
    I I. COASTAL STORMS IN N.s.w. .: AUGUST & NOVEMBER 1986 .1 and Their Effect on the Coast I 'I I 1'1 ! I I I I I I I I I I , . < May 198,8 , 'I " I I : COASTAL STORMS· IN N.s.w. I AUGUST & NOVEMBER 1986 I and Their Effect on the Coast I I I I I 1: 1 I I I I I M.N. CLARKE M.G. GEARY I Chief Engineer Principal Engineer I Prepared by : University of N.S.W. Water Research Laboratory I bID IPTIID311IIcr: ~Th'¥@~ , I May 1988 ------..! Coaat a Rivera Branch I I I I CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ( ii ) I LIST OF TABLES (iv) 1. INTRODUCTION I 2. SUMMARY 2 3. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 5 I 3.1 METEOROLOGICAL DATA 5 3.2 TIDE LEVELS 7 3.3 WAVE HEIGHTS AND PERIODS 10 I 3.4 STORM mSTORY - AUGUST 1985 TO AUGUST 1986 13 4. WAVE RUN-UP 15 I 4.1 MANLY WARRINGAH BEACHES 15 4.2 BATEMANS BAY BEACHES 15 I 4.3 THEORETICAL ASSESSMENT 16 4.4 COMPARISON OF MEASURED AND THEORETICAL RUN-UP LEVELS 23 5. BEACH SURVEYS 25 ·1 5.1 GOSFORD BEACHES 25 5.2 MANLY W ARRINGAH BEACHES 28 I 5.3 BATEMANS BAY BEACHES 29 6. OFFSHORE SURVEYS . 30 6.1 SURVEY METHODS 30 I 6.2 GOSFORD BEACHES 30 6.3 WARRINGAH BEACHES 31 I 6.4 ASSESSMENT OF ACCURACY OF OFFSHORE SURVEYS 32 7. OFFSHORE SEDIMENT SAMPLES - GOSFORD BEACHES 34 7.1 SAMPLE COLLECTION 34 I 7.2 SAMPLE CLASSIFICATION 34 , 7.3 SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS 34 I 7.4 COMPARISON OF 1983/84 AND POST STORM OFFSHORE DATA 36 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Importance of Different Near-Shore Marine Habitats
    Assessment of the importance of different near-shore marine habitats to important fishery species in Victoria using standardised survey methods, and in temperate and sub-tropical Australia using stable isotope analysis Jeremy Hindell, Gregory Jenkins, Rod Connolly and Glenn Hyndes Project No. 2001/036 Assessment of the importance of different near-shore marine habitats to important fishery species in Victoria using standardised survey methods, and in temperate and sub-tropical Australia using stable isotope analysis Jeremy S. Hindell1, Gregory P. Jenkins1, Rod M. Connolly2, Glenn A. Hyndes3 1 Marine and Freshwater Systems, Primary Industries Research Victoria, Department of Primary Industries, Queenscliff 3225 2 School of Environmental & Applied Sciences, Griffith University, Queensland 9726 3 School of Natural Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Western Australia 6027 October 2004 2001/036 © Fisheries Research and Development Corporation and Primary Industries Research Victoria. 2005 This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. ISBN 1 74146 474 9 Preferred way to cite: Hindell JS, Jenkins GP, Connolly RM and Hyndes G (2004) Assessment of the importance of different near-shore marine habitats to important fishery species in Victoria using standardised survey methods, and in temperate and sub-tropical Australia using stable isotope analysis. Final report to Fisheries Research and Development Corporation Project No. 2001/036. Primary Industries Research Victoria, Queenscliff. Published by Primary Industries Research Victoria, Marine and Freshwater Systems, Department of Primary Industries, Queenscliff, Victoria, 3225.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Critically Endangered Spotted Handfish
    Conserving Critically Endangered spotted handfish Unique and quirky, spotted handfish (Brachionichthys hirsutus) are recognisable by their modified fins that resemble human hands. Once common in southern Tasmania’s Derwent estuary, spotted handfish experienced a severe decline in the 1980s. In 1996 they became the first marine fish to be listed as Critically Endangered by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. They are also listed as Critically Endangered under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, and Endangered under Tasmania's Threatened Species Protection Act 1995. Spotted handfish were once common in Tasmania’s Derwent estuary, but their populations experienced CSIRO, University of Tasmania (UTAS), the a serious decline in the 1980s. Tasmanian and Australian governments and the Derwent Estuary Program (DEP) have between 5–15m. Within bays they occupy been working together to conserve spotted habitats with more complex features such as handfish since the mid-1990s. depressions in the seabed made by stingrays, or fields of sea-squirts. Distribution Lacking swim bladders, spotted handfish use Handfish belong to a group of coastal their modified fins to ‘walk’ across the seabed anglerfish with a narrow distribution in south- rather than swim. Movement studies suggest eastern Australia. There are 14 species with they only travel small distances: 10m–460m seven endemic to Tasmania and Bass Strait. over many months, or an average of 4m a day. Spotted handfish were once prevalent along Spotted handfish are ambush predators and, Tasmania’s eastern coast, and were so like their close cousins the deep-sea angler common that during the 1960s and ‘70s that fishes, they have a lure located just above the they were routinely collected for practical mouth, perhaps to entice their prey of demonstrations at Hobart’s university.
    [Show full text]