DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed Development Information to Accompany

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed Development Information to Accompany ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TO ACCOMPANY DRAFT AMENDMENT NO.6 TO D’ENTRECASTEAUX CHANNEL MARINE FARMING DEVELOPMENT PLAN FEBRUARY 2002 PROPONENT: TASSAL OPERATIONS PTY LTD Glossary ADCP Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler AGD Amoebic Gill Disease ASC Aquaculture Stewardship Council BAP Best Aquaculture Practices BEMP Broadscale Environmental Monitoring Program CAMBA China-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement CEO Chief Executive Officer COBP Code of Best Practice CSER corporate, social and environmental responsibility CSIRO Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation DAFF Depart of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry dBA A-weighted decibels DMB Dry matter basis DO dissolved oxygen DPIW Department of Primary Industries and Water DPIPWE Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and the Environment EDO Environmental Defenders Office ENGOs environmental non-governmental organisations EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMS Environmental Management System EPA Environmental Protection Authority EPBCA Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 FCR Feed Conversion Ratio FHMP Fish Health Management Plan FSANZ Food Standards Australia New Zealand g gram GAA Global Aquaculture Alliance ha hectare HAB Harmful Algal Bloom HOG head on gutted HVN Huon Valley News IALA International Association of Lighthouse Authorities IMAS Institute of Marine and Antarctic Studies i JAMBA Japan-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement kg kilogram km kilometre L litre LED light-emitting diode m metre mm millimetre MAST Marine and Safety Tasmania MFDP Marine Farming Development Plan MFPA Marine Farming Planning Act 1995 MIC Marine Inspector Cleaner ML megalitre ppm parts per million ppt parts per thousand PST Paralytic Shellfish Toxin RSPCA Royal Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ROKAMBA Republic of Korea-Australia Migratory Bird Agreement ROV remote operated vehicle s second SBP Selective Breeding Program SCAT Southern Coastcare Association of Tasmania SCUBA Self-Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus SEP Tassal’s Stakeholder Engagement Program SGS Summer Gut Syndrome SOMV Salmon Orthomyxovirus t tonne TAC Tasmanian Abalone Council TARA Tasmanian Aquaculture Reform Alliance TARFish Tasmanian Association for Recreational Fishing TPDNO Total Permissible Dissolved Nitrogen Output TRLFA Tasmanian Rock Lobster Fishermen’s Association TSGA Tasmanian Salmonid Growers Association TSIC Tasmanian Seafood Industry Council TSPA Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 W watts ii WH&S workplace health and safety WIP Wildlife Interaction Plan WWF World Wildlife Fund for Nature WWTP Waste Water Treatment Plant iii 1 Contents 1 Contents ............................................................................................................... iv 2 Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Proposed Amendment Description ........................................................................... 1 2.2 Stakeholder Consultation ............................................................................................. 1 2.3 Existing Environment ..................................................................................................... 1 2.4 Potential Effects and Their Management ................................................................... 2 2.5 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 3 3 Proposed Amendment Description ................................................................... 4 3.1 Proposal Overview ......................................................................................................... 4 3.1.1 Proponent Details ..................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1.2 Rationale / Need for the Proposal ...................................................................................................... 4 3.1.3 Proposed Development .......................................................................................................................... 5 3.1.4 Anticipated Establishment Costs .......................................................................................................... 7 3.1.5 Existing and Likely Markets for Product ............................................................................................ 7 3.1.6 Relationship to other Proposals/Developments ............................................................................... 8 3.2 Proposed Zone and Lease Details .............................................................................. 8 3.2.1 Location of Proposed Zone.................................................................................................................... 8 3.2.2 Proposed Zone Area................................................................................................................................ 9 3.2.3 Location of Proposed Lease ................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Infrastructure and Servicing ......................................................................................... 9 3.3.1 Mooring and Grid system ...................................................................................................................... 9 3.3.2 Size and Configuration of Sea Pens/Netting .................................................................................. 10 3.3.3 Construction Aspects ............................................................................................................................. 10 3.3.4 Servicing the Proposed Zone .............................................................................................................. 11 3.3.5 Infrastructure Maintenance ................................................................................................................ 13 3.4 Stock Husbandry Aspects .......................................................................................... 14 3.4.1 Fish Size / Stocking Density ................................................................................................................ 14 3.4.2 Fish Feeding ............................................................................................................................................. 14 3.4.3 Fish Health ............................................................................................................................................... 14 3.4.4 Predator Control ..................................................................................................................................... 17 3.5 Waste Management..................................................................................................... 17 3.5.1 Solid Waste .............................................................................................................................................. 17 3.5.2 Liquid Waste ........................................................................................................................................... 19 3.5.3 Environmental Monitoring ................................................................................................................... 19 iv 3.6 Decommissioning and Rehabilitation ...................................................................... 22 4 Stakeholder Consultation .................................................................................. 23 4.1 Stakeholder Engagement Activities ......................................................................... 28 4.1.1 Local Residents/Community Members ............................................................................................. 28 4.1.2 Consultation with yacht and boating clubs ..................................................................................... 34 4.1.3 Fishing Groups Consultations .............................................................................................................. 34 4.1.4 Tourism Operator Consultation ......................................................................................................... 37 4.1.5 MAST and TASPORTS Consultations ............................................................................................... 37 4.1.6 Other Consultation ................................................................................................................................. 37 4.2 Major outcomes of Stakeholder Engagement ....................................................... 38 4.2.1 Local Residents/Community Members ............................................................................................. 38 4.2.2 Yachting and Boating Clubs ................................................................................................................ 43 4.2.3 Fishing Groups ......................................................................................................................................... 44 4.2.4 Tourism Operators................................................................................................................................. 46 4.2.5 Other ........................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conservation of Handfish and Their Habitats – Annual Report Tim Lynch, Tyson Bessell, Alexander Hormann, Carlie Devine and Neville Barrett
    Conservation of handfish and their habitats – annual report Tim Lynch, Tyson Bessell, Alexander Hormann, Carlie Devine and Neville Barrett Project A10 – Conservation of spotted handfish 28 February 2019 Milestone 4– Research Plan 4 (2018) www.nespmarine.edu.au Enquiries should be addressed to: Dr Tim P. Lynch Senior Research Scientist CSIRO Castray Esplanade [email protected] Project Leader’s Distribution List Derwent Estuary Program Ursula Taylor Zoo and Aquarium Association (ZAA) Craig Thorburn Natural Resource Management (NRM) Nepelle Crane South MAST Ian Ross Royal Yacht Club of Tasmania Nick Hutton Derwent Sailing Squadron Shaun Tiedemann The Handfish Recovery Team (HRT) See list below Marine and Freshwater Species Conservation Section Wildlife, Heritage and Marine Division Department of the Environment and Energy (DoEE) Threatened Species Policy and Andrew Crane Conservation Advice Branch Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE) Office of the Threatened Species Commissioner (DoEE) The project will also report its findings on a semi-annual basis to the National Handfish Recovery Team (NHRT) – see below. This is a governance body that is constituted between the Tasmanian State and the Commonwealth government with other interested parties: Department of the Environment and Energy (Commonwealth) Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Andrew Crane Environment (Tas) CSIRO scientist, running current surveys and substrate trials Tim Lynch (Chair) University of Tasmania, handfish research Neville
    [Show full text]
  • Huon Valley Council 2002 Election Report
    Huon Valley Council 2002 election report Table of contents • Local Government Elections in Tasmania • Report on the 2002 Huon Valley Council Election • List of Councillors following the 2002 elections • Councillor results • Mayor and Deputy Mayor results • By-election result • Recount results Local Government Elections in Tasmania Every second (even) year elections are held in all 29 councils for the positions of mayor and deputy mayor and half the councillor positions. Where required, by-elections are held concurrently for vacancies that have occurred since the last elections. The Tasmanian Electoral Office (TEO) supervises the conduct of elections in accordance with the Local Government Act 1993. Elections by postal ballot have been held in 1994, 1996, 1999 (deferred from 1998), 2000 and 2002, with the next elections due in October 2004. Since 2000 mayors and deputy mayors are elected directly by the electors in each municipal area. Candidate information booklets and complete election results for the state are available from the TEO and are posted on the TEO website www.electoral.tas.gov.au. 2002 Election timetable Notice of election published Saturday 14 September Electoral rolls closed 6 pm Thursday 19 September Nomination period 23 September— 12 noon on 2 October Nominations closed 12 noon Wednesday 2 October Nominations announced & draw for ballot paper positions 12 noon Thursday 3 October Ballot material delivered to electors 15–18 October Polling period 15–29 October Close of poll 10 am Tuesday 29 October Casual vacancies Casual vacancies are filled by recount where possible, unless the vacancy occurs within 6 months of a forthcoming election.
    [Show full text]
  • Clarence Bushland & Coastal Strategy
    Clarence Bushland & Coastal Strategy “Healthy landscapes, Healthy community” Clarence City Council August 2011 Clarence Bushland and Coastal Strategy Page i Contents summary introduction • Key statement • Background • Communities views of the natural values of Clarence City • Strategic Framework key management topics • context • key issues key themes & strategies • protect natural assets through regulation and planning • improved knowledge and its management • develop bush land and coastal management plans and strategies • enjoying natural areas • work with landcare, bushcare, coastcare and other volunteer groups to enhance resources and capacity to implement plans and initiatives • inform, promote and partner policy • What we know about the natural values of Clarence • Scope • Strategic context • The role of Clarence City Council • Strategy process • Commitments, Objectives and Principles • Implementation, monitoring and review • Glossary ACKNOWLEGEMENTS Clarence City Council would like to particularly thank members of the Bushland and Coastal Management Strategy Stakeholder Reference Group listed on an acknowledgements page towards the end of the strategy. Page ii Clarence Bushland and Coastal Strategy Summary Clarence City abounds with natural assets that are cherished by the community. They are the focus of efforts to retain and enhance their presence here. There is a diversity of land management practices in place and a variety of views about what is the best approach to managing natural values. Clarence City Council made the decision
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes Need to Be Changed at All)
    (v.1 Please let me know if the minutes need to be changed at all) Kevin Turner RDA Tasmania Mobile: 0419395178 Email: [email protected] MINUTES Local Government Economic Development Network Thursday 28th August 2020 Online via Zoom 2pm to 4pm Attendees Thanks to the 28 who attended and welcome to those joined for the first time: Adriaan Stander (Kingborough Council: Strategic Planner), Bill Duhig (Skills Tasmania: Project Manager), Bruce Williams (City of Launceston: Economic Development Officer), Carol Bracken (Cradle Coast Authority: Program Manager - Regional Futures Plan), Carolyn Coates (Hobart City Council: International Relations | Economic Development, Engagement and Strategy | Community Life), Craig Perkins (RDA Tasmania: Chief Executive Officer & Director Regional Development), Erin McGoldrick (Glenorchy City Council: Manager City Strategy and Economic Development), Fiona Ranson (City of Launceston: Urban Design & Heritage Planner), Jackie Harvey (State Growth: Project Manager), Jaime Parsons (City of Launceston: Team Leader Place Making, Liveable Communities), Jane Eldershaw (State Growth: Project Manager Antarctic Tasmania and Regional Coordination), Jen Newman (RDA Tasmania: Regional Development Coordinator), Kevin Turner (RDA Tasmania: Regional Development Coordinator), Linda Seeborn (Skills Tasmania: Manager, Workforce Policy and Programs), Lucy Knot (Hobart City Council: Economic Development Project Officer), Luke Doyle (Hobart City Council: Manager Economic Development, Engagement and Strategy), Marilyn
    [Show full text]
  • A Biological Monitoring Survey of Reef Biota Within Bathurst Channel, Southwest Tasmania 2010 Neville Barrett, Elizabeth Oh, Lisa Meyer, Dane Jones and Graham Edgar
    A BIOLOGICAL MONITORING SURVEY OF REEF BIOTA WITHIN BATHURST CHANNEL, SOUTHWEST TASMANIA 2010 NEVILLE BARRETT, ELIZABETH OH, LISA MEYER, DANE JONES AND GRAHAM EDGAR Executive Summary The benthic reef communities of Bathurst Channel represent an important feature for the ongoing management of Tasmania‟s marine ecology and diversity. Containing a number of fragile deep-water invertebrate species growing at accessibly shallow depths, the reef habitats are both susceptible to impacts and of scientific importance. The foundation for this study was the continuing need for a practical, quantitative monitoring program which will provide information on species composition, species distribution throughout the channel, and detect any changes occurring over time. The survey, conducted in March 2010, collected digital image data from depth intervals ranging from the intertidal zone to 20 metres depth at 13 monitoring sites extending throughout Bathurst channel, and compared it to baseline imagery taken in 2002. The high resolution imagery collected in 2010 was used to create a descriptive catalogue of the biota observed, which can be used for future monitoring and species referencing. Species and substrate percentage cover in the photos was analysed using an easily repeatable point count method (CPCe) where data files can be stored and reanalysed. The information collected described the changes in species composition along Bathurst Channel, and thus provided some insight into the relevant environmental and biological factors limiting the distribution of algal and invertebrate species throughout the estuary. Results were consistent with previous descriptions of the community types within the Channel, showing that this system is inherently stable over these time frames.
    [Show full text]
  • Huon Valley Council Board of Inquiry Report to the Minister for Planning
    Huon Valley Council Board of Inquiry Report to the Minister for Planning and Local Government June 2016 ISBN: Date: Version: Disclaimer for as many lines as needed Epuditis quatis moloreped quam consequi bea quatem. Itatect urepudis maio. Nem fugiant que velis aboreptatque res excea sam, unt, voluptas erum faci reperias de saperfer Dae. Git eius experiaecte de sae conseris ellenis sin coratur magnimo luptatur sae nosam nihilit que del in niendis imagnienimus maionsequia con et voluptatint que ducipiduciis earia a vel ius expediorem inusapi ciliti alite voluptasitas et ea sinia Huon Valley Council Board of Inquiry Report to the Minister for Planning and Local Government Author Huon Valley Council Board of Inquiry Contact details Huon Valley Council Board of Inquiry GPO Box 123 HOBART TAS 7001 Publisher Huon Valley Council Board of Inquiry ISBN 978 0 7246 5702 9 Date June 2016 © Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania June 2016 HUON VALLEY COUNCIL BOARD OF INQUIRY Executive Building, 15 Murray Street, HOBART TAS 7000 Australia Postal Address: GPO Box 123, HOBART TAS 7001 Australia Phone: (03) 6232 7022 Fax: (03) 6233 5685 Email: [email protected] 3 June 2016 Minister for Planning and Local Government The Hon Peter Gutwein MP House of Assembly Parliament House HOBART 7000 Dear Minister Gutwein HUON VALLEY COUNCIL BOARD OF INQUIRY REPORT TO THE MINISTER FOR PLANNING AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT Pursuant to section 224 of the Local Government Act 1993, the Huon Valley Council Board of Inquiry is pleased to submit its findings and recommendations to you in this report for your consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Natural Values Within the 2013 Extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area
    A review of natural values within the 2013 extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Nature Conservation Report 2017/6 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Hobart A review of natural values within the 2013 extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Jayne Balmer, Jason Bradbury, Karen Richards, Tim Rudman, Micah Visoiu, Shannon Troy and Naomi Lawrence. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Nature Conservation Report 2017/6, September 2017 This report was prepared under the direction of the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (World Heritage Program). Australian Government funds were contributed to the project through the World Heritage Area program. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Tasmanian or Australian Governments. ISSN 1441-0680 Copyright 2017 Crown in right of State of Tasmania Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright act, no part may be reproduced by any means without permission from the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment. Published by Natural Values Conservation Branch Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment GPO Box 44 Hobart, Tasmania, 7001 Front Cover Photograph of Eucalyptus regnans tall forest in the Styx Valley: Rob Blakers Cite as: Balmer, J., Bradbury, J., Richards, K., Rudman, T., Visoiu, M., Troy, S. and Lawrence, N. 2017. A review of natural values within the 2013 extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Nature Conservation Report 2017/6, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Critically Endangered Spotted Handfish
    Conserving Critically Endangered spotted handfish Unique and quirky, spotted handfish (Brachionichthys hirsutus) are recognisable by their modified fins that resemble human hands. Once common in southern Tasmania’s Derwent estuary, spotted handfish experienced a severe decline in the 1980s. In 1996 they became the first marine fish to be listed as Critically Endangered by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. They are also listed as Critically Endangered under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, and Endangered under Tasmania's Threatened Species Protection Act 1995. Spotted handfish were once common in Tasmania’s Derwent estuary, but their populations experienced CSIRO, University of Tasmania (UTAS), the a serious decline in the 1980s. Tasmanian and Australian governments and the Derwent Estuary Program (DEP) have between 5–15m. Within bays they occupy been working together to conserve spotted habitats with more complex features such as handfish since the mid-1990s. depressions in the seabed made by stingrays, or fields of sea-squirts. Distribution Lacking swim bladders, spotted handfish use Handfish belong to a group of coastal their modified fins to ‘walk’ across the seabed anglerfish with a narrow distribution in south- rather than swim. Movement studies suggest eastern Australia. There are 14 species with they only travel small distances: 10m–460m seven endemic to Tasmania and Bass Strait. over many months, or an average of 4m a day. Spotted handfish were once prevalent along Spotted handfish are ambush predators and, Tasmania’s eastern coast, and were so like their close cousins the deep-sea angler common that during the 1960s and ‘70s that fishes, they have a lure located just above the they were routinely collected for practical mouth, perhaps to entice their prey of demonstrations at Hobart’s university.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultimate Cruising Guests Also Receive: Chauffeur Driven Luxury Car Transfers from Your Home to the Airport and Return (Within 35Km) Cruise Highlights
    ultimatecruising.com.au or call us on 1300 485 846 FROM $15,996pp Package #408 Revel in the opportunity to tread some of Tasmania’s greatest coastal tracks while you circumnavigate this island state by sea. Land on remote pristine beaches; trek through coastal heath, buttongrass moorlands, lush temperate rainforests and tall eucalypt woodlands; and drink in the stunning vistas from towering dolerite peaks. Explore islands whose only permanent inhabitants include Bennett’s wallabies, wombats, potoroos, possums and pademelons. Cruise the wild, storm-swept coastlines and sheltered, shimmering bays. Experience a variety of trekking treasures on Bruny, Flinders and Maria Islands. Delight in the raucousness of an Australian fur seal colony’s rocky haul-out on the Hunter Islands; the gregariousness of the gannets at Pedra Branca; and the majesty of a soaring shy albatross in the skies above Mewstone. Create and collate a treasured suite of memories – on foot or by sea – with extraordinary adventures on offer each day. This expedition is subject to regulatory approval and only open to Australian and New Zealand residents. Highlights include: Head off the ‘mother ship’ each day for a range of adventures and explorations that may include hiking options, wildlife watching, Zodiac cruises, diving^, snorkelling^, climbing^ or kayaking^ Access some of the best (and least) known walks in Tasmania, including those on Bruny, Flinders and Maria Islands, and the Hunter and Kent Island Groups On Maria Island – nicknamed Tasmania’s “Noah’s Ark” – enjoy an
    [Show full text]
  • Papers of Theroyal Society of Tasmania 1927
    lll ,- <> PAPERS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TASMANIA 1927 THE SOUTH COAST AND PORT DAV·EY, TASMANIA, By CLIVE LoRD, F .L.S. (Director of the Tasmanian Museum). CORRIGENDA (Plates I.-XII. and Five Text figures.) (Read 11th April, 1927.) Page 187, line six-Early in 1850 sho1tld read Early INTRODUCTORY. in 1853. On 13th September, 1875, the late Hon. J. R. Scott read Page 193-The Paragraph b~ginning "The coast line'' a paper (Scott, P. & P. Roy. Soc. Tas., 1875) before this should come before "(b) Stratigraphy" ~n page 192. Society describing Port Davey. The facts contained in Scott's paper are of value at the present time to those in search of information concerning the early history of the south-western portion of Tasmania, and as in years to come information may be desired concerning the condition of the south-western regi-on half a century after Scott's account was written, the writer desires to place on record certain brief general obser­ vations concerning this interesting area. The remarks made in the present instance are the out­ come of two brief visits to this area. In January, 1926, I visited the South Coast as far as New Harbour in my own yacht Telopea. Again, in January, 1927, at the kind invi­ tation of Mr. M. R. Freney, I visited the S-outh C-oast and Port Davey in the ketch Len'IUL (S. Purdon, Skipper). Messrs. P. B. Nye and F. Blake of the Mines Department were also members of this latter excursion. During the recent visit to this area we landed at Cox Bight, and camped for some days before walking across and rejoining our !boat at Port Davey.
    [Show full text]
  • Handfish Survey in the Vicinity of a Proposed Intake Pipeline
    HANDFISH SURVEY IN THE VICINITY OF A PROPOSED INTAKE PIPELINE AND EXISTING INTAKE INSPECTION AT CRAYFISH POINT, TAROONA, DERWENT ESTUARY Report to IMAS March 2018 www.marinesolutions.net.au © Marine Solutions 2018. This document should only be used for the specific project and purposes for which it was commissioned. 1 Version Author Date Reviewed by reviewed 1 of 1 Annie Ford and 20/03/2018 Laura Smith Joanna Smart Note: Location maps throughout this report are representative only; for precise GPS coordinates, see the appendices. All satellite imagery used throughout is sourced from The Land Information System Tasmania (LIST). 1 Cover photo, IMAS Taroona, November 2016 (photo by Marine Solutions). Handfish survey at site of proposed intake pipeline, Taroona 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 6 2 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Background ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Level: Elementary / Pre-Intermediate
    Stoked! Surfboard lost in Tasmania turns up 2,700km away in Queensland Level: Elementary / Pre-intermediate 1 Warmer a. In pairs, think of all of the rivers, seas or oceans near you. b. What would happen if you dropped an object that can float into one of these rivers, oceans or seas? Where would it go? Is it possible you could find it again? Discuss your answers. 2 Key words a. Write the words in the boxes next to their meanings. Then find and underline them in the article. barnacles florescent local recognize via 1. going to one place on the way to another place 2. sea creatures that stick to objects in the sea 3. in or from the area that you are talking about 4. know what you are looking at because you have seen it before 5. a type of colour that is very bright and reflects light current logo miss remote straps 6. the parts on some surfboards that you put your feet through 7. a picture or symbol a company puts on the products they make 8. a strong movement of water in one direction 9. far away from anywhere else 10. wish you still had something that you used to have Published by Macmillan Education Ltd. © Macmillan Education Limited, 2021. Home >> Adults >> General English >> NEWS LESSONS FROM WEBSITE •PHOTOCOPIABLE•CAN BE DOWNLOADED Stoked! Surfboard lost in Tasmania turns up 2,700km away in Queensland Level: Elementary / Pre-intermediate b. Use some of the key words above to complete these sentences. 1. A strong took the boat out to sea.
    [Show full text]