DOCSLIB.ORG

Invasive Plant Inventory and Bird Cherry Control Trials

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Invasive Plant Inventory and Bird Cherry Control Trials INVASIVE PLANT INVENTORY AND BIRD CHERRY CONTROL TRIALS Phase I: Non-native plants recorded along four Anchorage Municipality trail systems INVASIVE PLANT INVENTORY AND BIRD CHERRY CONTROL TRIALS Phase I: Non-native plants recorded along four Anchorage Municipality trail systems Prepared by: Helen Cortés-Burns and Lindsey A. Flagstad Alaska Natural Heritage Program University of Alaska Anchorage 707 A Street Anchorage, AK 99501 Prepared for: The Municipality of Anchorage & Anchorage Parks Foundation October 2009 Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................... 3 Methods......................................................................................................................................................... 4 I. Study area .............................................................................................................................................. 4 II. Plot types ................................................................................................................................................ 5 a. Plot naming and numbering convention ........................................................................................... 5 b. Exhaustive species plots .................................................................................................................. 7 c. Outlier plots ...................................................................................................................................... 8 III. Post-fieldwork analyses .......................................................................................................................... 9 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................................................... 10 I. Study-wide trends ................................................................................................................................. 13 a. Non-native species most frequently recorded on MOA lands........................................................ 13 b. MOA land cover types most susceptible to invasion ..................................................................... 17 II. Study-wide control priorities ................................................................................................................. 18 a. Identifying priorities for control work .............................................................................................. 18 b. Priority areas and species for control work .................................................................................... 18 III. Campbell Creek Greenbelt ................................................................................................................... 22 a. Summary of key findings ................................................................................................................ 22 b. Exhaustive species plot results ...................................................................................................... 25 IV. Chester Creek Greenbelt ...................................................................................................................... 29 a. Summary of key findings ................................................................................................................ 29 b. Exhaustive species plot results ...................................................................................................... 32 V. Tony Knowles Coastal Trail .................................................................................................................. 38 a. Summary of key findings ................................................................................................................ 38 b. Exhaustive species plot results ...................................................................................................... 41 VI. Kincaid Park .......................................................................................................................................... 46 Overview and summary of key findings ......................................................................................... 46 Multi-use Trail ................................................................................................................................. 53 a. Summary of key findings ......................................................................................................... 53 b. Exhaustive species plot results ............................................................................................... 55 Sisson Trail .................................................................................................................................... 57 a. Summary of key findings ......................................................................................................... 57 b. Exhaustive species plot results ............................................................................................... 60 Margaux‘s Loop .............................................................................................................................. 61 a. Summary of key findings ......................................................................................................... 61 b. Exhaustive plot results ............................................................................................................. 62 Lekisch Trail ................................................................................................................................... 64 a. Summary of key findings ......................................................................................................... 64 b. Exhaustive species plot results ............................................................................................... 67 Mize Loop ....................................................................................................................................... 70 a. Summary of key findings ......................................................................................................... 70 b. Exhaustive species plot results ............................................................................................... 70 Jodhpur Loop ................................................................................................................................. 72 a. Summary of key findings ......................................................................................................... 72 Post-fieldwork deliverables ......................................................................................................................... 73 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................................. 74 References .................................................................................................................................................. 77 Literature cited ...................................................................................................................................... 77 Web sources used ................................................................................................................................ 80 Appendices ................................................................................................................................................. 82 Appendix I: Highly-invasive species recorded in Alaska ............................................................................. 82 Appendix II: Field datasheet........................................................................................................................ 83 ii Appendix III: Voucher list ............................................................................................................................ 84 Appendix IV: Biology, distribution and management recommendations for select non-native species...... 90 High-priority species ............................................................................................................................. 90 Low-ranked species of concern ............................................................................................................ 90 Unranked species ................................................................................................................................. 91 Species not considered in this report ................................................................................................... 91 Hordeum jubatum (63, foxtail barley) ............................................................................................. 91 Taraxacum officinale ssp. officinale (58, common dandelion) ....................................................... 91 Poa pratensis spp. pratensis and ssp. irrigata (52, Kentucky, spreading or rough bluegrass) ................................................................................................................................ 92 Poa
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pru Nus Contains Many Species and Cultivars, Pru Nus Including Both Fruits and Woody Ornamentals
    ;J. N l\J d.000 A~ :J-6 '. AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION SERVICE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA • The genus Pru nus contains many species and cultivars, Pru nus including both fruits and woody ornamentals. The arboretum's Prunus maacki (Amur Cherry). This small tree has bright, emphasis is on the ornamental plants. brownish-yellow bark that flakes off in papery strips. It is par­ Prunus americana (American Plum). This small tree furnishes ticularly attractive in winter when the stems contrast with the fruits prized for making preserves and is also an ornamental. snow. The flowers and fruits are produced in drooping racemes In early May, the trees are covered with a "snowball" bloom similar to those of our native chokecherry. This plant is ex­ of white flowers. If these blooms escape the spring frosts, tremely hardy and well worth growing. there will be a crop of colorful fruits in the fall. The trees Prunus maritima (Beach Plum). This species is native to the sucker freely, and unless controlled, a thicket results. The A­ coastal plains from Maine to Virginia. It's a sprawling shrub merican Plum is excellent for conservation purposes, and the reaching a height of about 6 feet. It blooms early with small thickets are favorite refuges for birds and wildlife. white flowers. Our plants have shown varying degrees of die­ Prunus amygdalus (Almond). Several cultivars of almonds­ back and have been removed for this reason. including 'Halls' and 'Princess'-have been tested. Although Prunus 'Minnesota Purple.' This cultivar was named by the the plants survived and even flowered, each winter's dieback University of Minnesota in 1920.
    [Show full text]
  • Biscogniauxia Granmoi (Xylariaceae) in Europe
    ©Österreichische Mykologische Gesellschaft, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Osten. Z.Pilzk 8(1999) 139 Biscogniauxia granmoi (Xylariaceae) in Europe THOMAS L£SS0E CHRISTIAN SCHEUER Botanical Institute, Copenhagen University Institut fiir Botanik der Karl-Franzens-Universitat Oster Farimagsgade 2D Holteigasse 6 DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark A-8010 Graz, Austria e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] ALFRED GRANMO Trornso Museum, University of Tromse N-9037 Tromso, Norway e-mail: [email protected] Received 5. 7. 1999 Key words: Xylariaceae, Biscogniauxia. - Taxonomy, distribution. - Fungi of Europe, Asia. Abstract: Biscogniauxia granmoi, growing on Prunus padus (incl. var. pubescens = Padus asiatica) is reported from Europe and Asia, with material from Austria, Latvia, Norway, Poland, and Far Eastern Russia. It is compared with B. nummulana s. str., B. capnodes and B. simphcior. The taxon was included in the recent revision of Biscogniauxia by JU & al. {1998, Mycotaxon 66: 50) under the name "B. pruni GRANMO, L/ESS0E & SCHEUER" nom. prov. Zusammenfassung: Biscogniauxia granmoi, die bisher ausschließlich auf Prunus padus (inkl. var pubescens = Padus asiatica) gefunden wurde, wird aufgrund von Aufsammlungen aus Europa und Asien vorgestellt. Die bisherigen Belege stammen aus Österreich, Litauen, Norwegen, Polen und dem femöstlichen Teil Rußlands. Die Unterschiede zu B. nummulana s. Str., B. capnodes und H simphaor werden diskutiert. Dieses Taxon wurde unter dem Namen "B. pruni Granmo, l.aessoe & Scheuer" nom. prov. schon von JU & al. (1998, Mycotaxon 66: 50) in ihre Revision der Gattung Biscogniauxia aufge- nommen. The genus Biscogniauxia KUNTZE (Xylariaceae) was resurrected and amended by POUZAR (1979, 1986) for a group of Xylariaceae with applanate dark stromata that MILLER (1961) treated in Hypoxylon BULL., and for a group of species with thick, discoid stromata formerly placed in Nummularia TUL.
    [Show full text]
  • 02. CENTAUREA.Indd
    ActaCentaurea Botanica sect. MalacitanaCyanus en la 35. Península 23-55 Ibérica Málaga, 201023 REVISIÓN TAXONÓMICA DEL COMPLEJO DE CENTAUREA CYANUS L. (CENTAUREA SECT. CYANUS, ASTERACEAE) EN LA PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA Adolfo Francisco MUÑOZ1 y Juan Antonio DEVESA2* Dirección de los autores.1Departamento de Biología Ambiental y Salud Pública, Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales, Universidad de Huelva, Avenida de la Fuerzas Armadas s/n, 21071-Badajoz, España 2Departamento de Botánica, Ecología y Fisiología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Edificio José Celestino Mutis, ctra. de Madrid km. 396, 14071-Córdoba, y Jardín Botánico de Córdoba, Avda. de Linneo s/n, 14004-Córdoba, España. *Autor para correspondencia: [email protected] Recibido el 1 de septiembre de 2010, aceptado para su publicación el 10 de octubre de 2010 RESUMEN. Revisión taxonómica del complejo de Centaurea cyanus L. (Centaurea sect. Cyanus, Asteraceae) en la Península Ibérica. Se ha efectuado la revisión taxonómica de Centaurea sect. Cyanus en la Península Ibérica. Se reconocen seis táxones y se hacen dos nuevas combinaciones: C. triumfettii var. semidecurrens (Jord.) Muñoz Rodr. & Devesa y C. graminifolia (Lam.) Muñoz Rodr. & Devesa. Se aporta una clave para la identificación de los táxones, así como su descripción morfológica e información sobre la distribución geográfica, apetencias ecológicas, fenología y número cromosómico. Palabras clave. Asteraceae, Centaurea, corología, taxonomía, Península Ibérica. ABSTRACT. Taxonomic revision of the Centaurea cyanus L. complex (Centaurea sect. Cyanus, Asteraceae) in the Iberian Peninsula. A taxonomic review of Centaurea sect. Cyanus in the Iberian Peninsula was done. Six taxa are recognized and two new combinations are proposed: C. triumfetti var.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Studies of the South African Campanulaceae Sensu Stricto with an Emphasis on Generic Delimitations
    Town The copyright of this thesis rests with the University of Cape Town. No quotation from it or information derivedCape from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of theof source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non-commercial research purposes only. University Systematic studies of the South African Campanulaceae sensu stricto with an emphasis on generic delimitations Christopher Nelson Cupido Thesis presented for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Botany Town UNIVERSITY OF CAPECape TOWN of September 2009 University Roella incurva Merciera eckloniana Microcodon glomeratus Prismatocarpus diffusus Town Wahlenbergia rubioides Cape of Wahlenbergia paniculata (blue), W. annularis (white) Siphocodon spartioides University Rhigiophyllum squarrosum Wahlenbergia procumbens Representatives of Campanulaceae diversity in South Africa ii Town Dedicated to Ursula, Denroy, Danielle and my parents Cape of University iii Town DECLARATION Cape I confirm that this is my ownof work and the use of all material from other sources has been properly and fully acknowledged. University Christopher N Cupido Cape Town, September 2009 iv Systematic studies of the South African Campanulaceae sensu stricto with an emphasis on generic delimitations Christopher Nelson Cupido September 2009 ABSTRACT The South African Campanulaceae sensu stricto, comprising 10 genera, represent the most diverse lineage of the family in the southern hemisphere. In this study two phylogenies are reconstructed using parsimony and Bayesian methods. A family-level phylogeny was estimated to test the monophyly and time of divergence of the South African lineage. This analysis, based on a published ITS phylogeny and an additional ten South African taxa, showed a strongly supported South African clade sister to the campanuloids.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genus Bruchus Was Restricted by Schilsky (6
    THE HAIRY-VETCH BRUCHID, BRUCHUS BRACHIALIS FAHRAEUS, IN THE UNITED STATES ' By J. C. BRIDWELL, formerly Specialist in Bruchidae and Their Parasites, Division of Stored Product Insects^ Bureau of Entomology, and L. J. BOTTIMER, Assistant Entomologist^ Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Agriculture INTRODUCTION The genus Bruchus was restricted by Schilsky (6) ^ to include only the immediate allies of Bruchus pisorum (L.), the pea weevil, of which he tabulated 24 species knowQ to him. To these may be added others doubtfully distinct, imperfectly known, or more recently described, which increase the nominal species of the genus to a total of about 46. All these species are native to the Palearctic region. Two of them are already well known in the United States as major pests of the plants affected. B. pisorum was the first of the genus and one of the first species of the family to be recognized. It was described in 1752, and was recorded as having destroyed in the 1740's the flourishing colonial American industry of producing dry peas for ships' stores. B. ruß- manus Boheman, the broadbean weevil, has now practically destroyed the broadbean industry of Caüfornia. A third species, B, hrachialis Fahraeus, has in recent years gained a foothold in this country, for in 1931 the junior author found it heavily infesting the seeds of vetches growing in New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, and North Carolina, and in 1932 it was found in Virginia. In view of these facts it seems wise to present a brief summary of the knowledge at present available of the habits of the members of this genus and to point out the increased danger of their estabhshment in the United States as a result of changed commercial conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Evolutionary History in Visual and Olfactory Floral Cues of the Bee-Pollinated Genus Campanula (Campanulaceae)
    plants Article Differential Evolutionary History in Visual and Olfactory Floral Cues of the Bee-Pollinated Genus Campanula (Campanulaceae) Paulo Milet-Pinheiro 1,*,† , Pablo Sandro Carvalho Santos 1, Samuel Prieto-Benítez 2,3, Manfred Ayasse 1 and Stefan Dötterl 4 1 Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein Allee, 89081 Ulm, Germany; [email protected] (P.S.C.S.); [email protected] (M.A.) 2 Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos-ESCET, C/Tulipán, s/n, Móstoles, 28933 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 3 Ecotoxicology of Air Pollution Group, Environmental Department, CIEMAT, Avda. Complutense, 40, 28040 Madrid, Spain 4 Department of Biosciences, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † Present address: Universidade de Pernambuco, Campus Petrolina, Rodovia BR 203, KM 2, s/n, Petrolina 56328-900, Brazil. Abstract: Visual and olfactory floral signals play key roles in plant-pollinator interactions. In recent decades, studies investigating the evolution of either of these signals have increased considerably. However, there are large gaps in our understanding of whether or not these two cue modalities evolve in a concerted manner. Here, we characterized the visual (i.e., color) and olfactory (scent) floral cues in bee-pollinated Campanula species by spectrophotometric and chemical methods, respectively, with Citation: Milet-Pinheiro, P.; Santos, the aim of tracing their evolutionary paths. We found a species-specific pattern in color reflectance P.S.C.; Prieto-Benítez, S.; Ayasse, M.; and scent chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of the Flora of New England: Fabaceae
    Angelo, R. and D.E. Boufford. 2013. Atlas of the flora of New England: Fabaceae. Phytoneuron 2013-2: 1–15 + map pages 1– 21. Published 9 January 2013. ISSN 2153 733X ATLAS OF THE FLORA OF NEW ENGLAND: FABACEAE RAY ANGELO1 and DAVID E. BOUFFORD2 Harvard University Herbaria 22 Divinity Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138-2020 [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Dot maps are provided to depict the distribution at the county level of the taxa of Magnoliophyta: Fabaceae growing outside of cultivation in the six New England states of the northeastern United States. The maps treat 172 taxa (species, subspecies, varieties, and hybrids, but not forms) based primarily on specimens in the major herbaria of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut, with most data derived from the holdings of the New England Botanical Club Herbarium (NEBC). Brief synonymy (to account for names used in standard manuals and floras for the area and on herbarium specimens), habitat, chromosome information, and common names are also provided. KEY WORDS: flora, New England, atlas, distribution, Fabaceae This article is the eleventh in a series (Angelo & Boufford 1996, 1998, 2000, 2007, 2010, 2011a, 2011b, 2012a, 2012b, 2012c) that presents the distributions of the vascular flora of New England in the form of dot distribution maps at the county level (Figure 1). Seven more articles are planned. The atlas is posted on the internet at http://neatlas.org, where it will be updated as new information becomes available. This project encompasses all vascular plants (lycophytes, pteridophytes and spermatophytes) at the rank of species, subspecies, and variety growing independent of cultivation in the six New England states.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Wisconsin Asterids
    Diversity of Wisconsin Asterids . bellflowers and asters . **Campanulaceae - bellflower family A family mostly of herbs, but some secondarily woody, widely distributed in the temperate regions and in the montane tropics. Contains 65 genera and over 2200 species, with half belonging to Campanula and Lobelia. • Family has alternate leaves and milky latex. • Flowers are 5 merous and inferior ovaried. **Campanulaceae - bellflower family The family is divided into two distinct subfamilies - Campanuloideae and Lobelioideae - distinguished by floral symmetry, staminal fusion, and carpel number. They were often considered as separate families. Campanulastrum - bellflower Lobelia - lobelia Subfamily Campanuloideae Subfamily Lobelioideae **Campanulaceae - bellflower family Subfamily Campanuloideae __ CA (5) CO (5) A 5 G (3-5) Campanula and relatives have actinomorphic flowers, stamens not fused, and 3-5 fused carpels. Note the 3 styles of Campanula to the left. **Campanulaceae - bellflower family Triodanis perfoliata - Venus looking glass Secondary pollen presentation **Campanulaceae - bellflower family Campanulastrum americana - tall bellflower **Campanulaceae - bellflower family Campanula rotundifolia Campanula rapunculoides Bluebell - circumboreal European bellflower **Campanulaceae - bellflower family Subfamily Lobelioideae Lobelia and relatives have __ zygomorphic flowers, stamens fused CA (5) CO (5) A (5) G (2) into a tube in which the pollen is shed, and 2 fused carpels. Style pushes pollen out through the tube. Style Staminal tube **Campanulaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Rank List.Xlsx
    FAMILY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME S RANK Aceraceae Acer ginnala Amur Maple SNA Aceraceae Acer negundo Manitoba Maple S5 Aceraceae Acer negundo var. interius Manitoba Maple S5 Aceraceae Acer negundo var. negundo Manitoba Maple SU Aceraceae Acer negundo var. violaceum Manitoba Maple SU Aceraceae Acer pensylvanicum Striped Maple SNA Aceraceae Acer rubrum Red Maple SNA Aceraceae Acer spicatum Mountain Maple S5 Acoraceae Acorus americanus Sweet Flag S5 Acoraceae Acorus calamus Sweet‐flag SNA Adoxaceae Adoxa moschatellina Moschatel S1 Alismataceae Alisma gramineum Narrow‐leaved Water‐plantain S1 Alismataceae Alisma subcordatum Common Water‐plantain SNA Alismataceae Alisma triviale Common Water‐plantain S5 Alismataceae Sagittaria cuneata Arum‐leaved Arrowhead S5 Alismataceae Sagittaria latifolia Broad‐leaved Arrowhead S4S5 Alismataceae Sagittaria rigida Sessile‐fruited Arrowhead S2 Amaranthaceae Amaranthus albus Tumble Pigweed SNA Amaranthaceae Amaranthus blitoides Prostrate Pigweed SNA Amaranthaceae Amaranthus hybridus Smooth Pigweed SNA Amaranthaceae Amaranthus retroflexus Redroot Pigweed SNA Amaranthaceae Amaranthus spinosus Thorny Amaranth SNA Amaranthaceae Amaranthus tuberculatus Rough‐fruited water‐hemp SU Anacardiaceae Rhus glabra Smooth Sumac S4 Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron rydbergii Poison‐ivy S5 Apiaceae Aegopodium podagraria Goutweed SNA Apiaceae Anethum graveolens Dill SNA Apiaceae Carum carvi Caraway SNA Apiaceae Cicuta bulbifera Bulb‐bearing Water‐hemlock S5 Apiaceae Cicuta maculata Water‐hemlock S5 Apiaceae Cicuta virosa Mackenzie's
    [Show full text]
  • The Campanulaceae of Ohio1
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by KnowledgeBank at OSU 142 WIENS ET AL. Vol. 62 THE CAMPANULACEAE OF OHIO1 ROBERT W. CRUDEN2 Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Ohio State University, Columbus 10 In Ohio the family Campanulaceae is represented by three genera: Campanula, Lobelia, and Specularia; and eleven species, of which five are common throughout the state and two are quite limited in their distribution. Following the key to species each species is briefly described, and distribution, common names, chromosome numbers, if known, and other pertinent data are given. Chromosome numbers are those given in Darlington and Wylie (1956) and in the papers of Bowden (1959a, 1959b). Average time of flowering is indi- ^ontribution Nc. 666 of the Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University. Research completed while a National Science Foundation Co-operative Fellow. 2Present address: Department of Botany, University of California, Berkeley 4, California. THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE 62(3): 142, May, 1962. No. 3 CAMPANULACEAE OF OHIO 143 cated as well as the extreme flowering dates as determined from a study of her- barium material. The genera and species are arranged alphabetically. Distri- bution maps are included. A dot represents a collection of a particular species in a given county. No attempt has been made to indicate the general area of collection within the county, as a majority of herbarium specimens do not have this information. It should also be pointed out that many of the collections examined are forty or more years old and thus the distribution maps do not neces- sarily indicate present distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Polygonaceae of Alberta
    AN ILLUSTRATED KEY TO THE POLYGONACEAE OF ALBERTA Compiled and writen by Lorna Allen & Linda Kershaw April 2019 © Linda J. Kershaw & Lorna Allen This key was compiled using informaton primarily from Moss (1983), Douglas et. al. (1999) and the Flora North America Associaton (2005). Taxonomy follows VAS- CAN (Brouillet, 2015). The main references are listed at the end of the key. Please let us know if there are ways in which the kay can be improved. The 2015 S-ranks of rare species (S1; S1S2; S2; S2S3; SU, according to ACIMS, 2015) are noted in superscript (S1;S2;SU) afer the species names. For more details go to the ACIMS web site. Similarly, exotc species are followed by a superscript X, XX if noxious and XXX if prohibited noxious (X; XX; XXX) according to the Alberta Weed Control Act (2016). POLYGONACEAE Buckwheat Family 1a Key to Genera 01a Dwarf annual plants 1-4(10) cm tall; leaves paired or nearly so; tepals 3(4); stamens (1)3(5) .............Koenigia islandica S2 01b Plants not as above; tepals 4-5; stamens 3-8 ..................................02 02a Plants large, exotic, perennial herbs spreading by creeping rootstocks; fowering stems erect, hollow, 0.5-2(3) m tall; fowers with both ♂ and ♀ parts ............................03 02b Plants smaller, native or exotic, perennial or annual herbs, with or without creeping rootstocks; fowering stems usually <1 m tall; fowers either ♂ or ♀ (unisexual) or with both ♂ and ♀ parts .......................04 3a 03a Flowering stems forming dense colonies and with distinct joints (like bamboo
    [Show full text]