A Soaring Inspiration, the Air Force Memorial Celebrates Its 10Th Anniversary This Month

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Soaring Inspiration, the Air Force Memorial Celebrates Its 10Th Anniversary This Month three silvery spires soar the vision of the dedicated group that enough money and win the necessary up, arching and narrowing navigated it from dream to reality. Ten permits to start construction. until they seem to disappear years on, it’s been embraced by the Air The National Park Service led the site in the air. They almost look like contrails, Force, other services, foreign airmen, and design committees on a tour of 18 but they’re stainless steel, not smoke. Yes, and random visitors to the nation’s possible locations in the Washington, you actually can hear aircraft engines— capital alike. D.C., area. The committee liked a usually from airliners approaching nearby “It has become what we had hoped number of them, including a small plot Reagan National Airport. for and expected,” said retired Air Force adjacent to the National Mall, near the This is the US Air Force Memorial Col. Pete Lindquist, who served as Air Smithsonian’s National Air and Space in Arlington, Va., designed to evoke the Force Memorial Foundation director of Museum. They settled, though, on an spectacular grace of fl ight and to honor operations from 1996 to 2012. area of Northern Virginia known as the commitment, heroism, and sacrifi ce Arlington Ridge. of all the men and women who have I N TH E G I N N I N G The site was directly in line with the served the cause of American airpower. The origins of the memorial began in east-west axis of the mall, just across Dedicated Oct. 14, 2006, the memorial, the wake of US victory in the 1991 Gulf the Potomac River. It was on land off set atop a hill overlooking both the Penta- War. A small group of Air Force Asso- the northern end of Arlington Cemetery gon and Arlington National Cemetery, is ciation leaders, headed by O. R. “Ollie” and between two existing attractions: now a decade old. In just 10 years it has Crawford, saw airpower’s dominance in the Netherlands Carillon—a thank-you become the Air Force’s ceremonial stage, that campaign as something worthy of from the Dutch for US aid during and hosting promotions and retirements, commemoration. after World War II—and the Marine historic commemorations, band concerts, Crawford helped form a foundation Corps War Memorial, the iconic giant and drill team performances. It is the that included himself, John R. Alison, statue that depicts raising the fl ag during scene of speeches, parades, and Honor George M. Douglas, Martin H. Harris, the battle for Iwo Jima. Coincidentally, Flight visits. Couples get engaged there. Thomas J. McKee, and Jack C. Price as it was only a short distance from the Spouses and children visit to remember trustees. The group was incorporated and site of the fi rst fl ight of a US military departed loved ones. Airmen—currently granted nonprofi t, tax-exempt status in airplane, on adjacent Fort Myer. serving, retired, and even those who 1992. Retired Lt. Gen. Robert D. Springer Given the proximity to the Iwo Jima served in USAF’s predecessor organi- accepted the job of executive director, Memorial, the foundation informed zations—come for inspiration. They and the Air Force Sergeants Association senior Marine Corps leaders of its plan show off the memorial to their families promised its full support. in February 1994. None raised objec- or just lean back and take in the majesty In 1993, business executive Joseph tions to the Air Force building its own of the spires. Coors Jr. came aboard as foundation memorial in the vicinity. The spires did not rise easily. Like chairman. H. Ross Perot Jr. agreed to serve More permission was needed, though. many monuments in Washington, the Air as chairman of the foundation’s site and Erecting memorials in and around the Force Memorial endured controversies design committee. Congress passed, and nation’s capital is a complicated pro- so heady that it changed shape and lo- President Bill Clinton signed, legislation cess, as a number of panels and commis- cation a number of times. It faced court authorizing the building of an Air Force sions have the power to say yes or no. challenges and congressional objections. Memorial on federal land. Within a year the foundation quickly But today it’s a place to celebrate the That signature started a clock ticking. won site approval from the National Air Force on a grand scale. That was The foundation had seven years to raise Capital Memorial Commission and A soaring inspiration, the Air Force Memorial celebrates its 10th anniversary this month. Staff photo by Mike Tsukamoto 2 A I R F O R C M a a in e / October 2016 These Magnificent Spires By Peter Grier A I R F O R C M a a in e / October 2016 21 1 Air Force Memorial illustration 2 Air Force Association photo 5 1 Sisson Studios photo via Centex Mid-Atlantic Construction the Commission of Fine Arts. The limits, architect James Ingo Freed had As Shaud recalls in a written refl ection National Capital Planning Commis- produced a design only 50 feet tall, with on the memorial’s construction, Gen. sion balked, however. The foundation space below for an interpretive center Michael J. Dugan, former Air Force worked with the group and agreed to and other functions (later eliminated Chief of Staff, was also present at the a number of design parameters that for practicality and cost). Viewed from fund-raiser and said, “I like the slogan eased its objections. above, the design was a fi ve-pointed star. ... ‘Soaring to Glory,’ but looking at the All signals seemed to say “go” in Not everyone in the Air Force loved model, that ain’t it.” 1996, as the foundation had all the site it. Retired Gen. John A. Shaud, former The more the guests looked at the de- and design approvals it needed. Fund- AFA executive director and memorial sign, Shaud wrote, the more “we tended raising started in earnest. foundation trustee, attended a fund- to agree with Mike.” The Secretary of This fi rst iteration of the Air Force raiser for the memorial entitled “Soar- the Air Force remarked, “It looks like a Memorial was quite different from the ing to Glory.” A model of the proposed moon lander.” Over time, a more pejora- one now standing. Due to the site height design was on display. tive nickname circulated: “the ashtray.” 22 A I R F O R C M a a in e / October 2016 3 Although it was 50 feet tall, it appeared stubby and squat. S I T B J E CT O N S Then a storm arose that the founda- tion hadn’t foreseen. It started small. Residents of the leafy neighborhood near the Arlington Ridge site began raising objections. They used the space as something of a neighborhood park for dog walking, Frisbee fl ying, and other activities. Some worried that the presence of a third memorial on the site would bring more people and vehicles and interfere with these activities. The opponents knew they needed al- Air Force Association photo lies. The objection of a neighborhood 4 Air Force Association photo association by itself wouldn’t derail the project. “They partnered with some retired marine folks and organizations and it certainly escalated from there,” said Lindquist. “We were portrayed as im- pacting the hallowed ground of the Marine Corps.” The opposition organized into a group called the Friends of Iwo Jima and began lobbying Congress. On July 30, 1997, Rep. Gerald B. H. Solomon (R-N.Y.), a Marine Corps veteran, introduced leg- islation prohibiting any new memorials near the Iwo Jima statue. A similar bill was introduced in the Senate in October. Opponents pursued court action via a civil suit as well. They got some support from active marines despite the fact that the corps had been consulted through- out the process, and the memorial had already received the explicit approval of the Marine Corps Commandant, Gen. Carl E. Mundy Jr. The foundation had followed the legal planning process by the book and successfully defended itself in the courts a number of times. In June 1998, a US District Court judge dismissed the Friends of Iwo Jima suit against the foundation via summary judgment. / 1/ A mod el of th e originally p rop osed Air F orce M emorial th at was to b e b u ilt on Arlington R id ge in V irginia. V isib le on th e righ t is th e M arine Corp s W ar M emorial, on th e lef t is th e N eth erland s Carillon. strto of the fi rst roose memorial at nigh t. / 3/ S p ires u nd er con- stru ction at M ariani M etal F ab ricators in 2 0 0 5 . / 4/ T h e sp ires are erected in 2 0 0 6. / 5 / An aerial p h otograp h of th e memorial constru ction site in N ov emb er 2 0 0 5 , with th e N av y Annex b eh ind it. A I R F O R C M a a in e / October 2016 23 1 2 USAF photo by TSgt. Cohen A. oung 6 P hoto by Navin Sarma An appeals court upheld this action in “There were some very concerned “The Friends of Iwo Jima, mainly May 1999. Meanwhile, the House and individuals at high levels in both ser- retired Marine generals, were each pre- Senate bills that would have blocked the vices—the Marine Corps and Air Force— pared to make a speech,” and they did, memorial went nowhere.
Recommended publications
  • Status Report to Congress: the Renovation of the Pentagon, 18Th Edition, March 1, 2008, (Covers CY 2007)
    Description of document: Status Report to Congress: The Renovation of the Pentagon, 18th Edition, March 1, 2008, (Covers CY 2007) Requested date: 03-June-2008 Released date: 23-June-2008 Posted date: 23-June-2008 Title of Document A Status Report to Congress The Renovation of the Pentagon Date/date range of document: CY 2007 Source of document: Pentagon Renovation & Construction Program Office 100 Boundary Channel Drive, Arlington, VA 22201 E-mail: [email protected] The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. From: "Hutchins, Lea CTR WHS/PENREN/PARSONS" <[email protected]> Date: 2008/06/23 Mon AM 08:52:17 CDT Subject: RE: 2008 Pentagon Renovation Report You will find the Report attached. Thank you. Lea Hutchins -----Original Message----- Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 9:43 PM Posted To: Renovation (PenRen) Conversation: 2008 Pentagon Renovation Report Subject: 2008 Pentagon Renovation Report Dear Sirs: I am a civilian citizen.
    [Show full text]
  • ED Recommendation Template
    Executive Director’s Recommendation Commission Meeting: July 9, 2015 PROJECT NCPC FILE NUMBER Final Master Plan MP45 Arlington National Cemetery NCPC MAP FILE NUMBER Arlington County, Virginia 1.61(05.00)44034 SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT’S REQUEST United States Department of Defense Approval of final master plan Department of the Army PROPOSED ACTION REVIEW AUTHORITY Approve as requested Advisory per 40 U.S.C. § 8722(a) and (b)(1) ACTION ITEM TYPE Consent Calendar PROJECT SUMMARY The Department of the Army submitted a Final Real Property Master Plan for Arlington National Cemetery (ANC). ANC is a 624-acre cemetery located in Arlington County, Virginia surrounded by major roadways, Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall (JBM-HH), the Pentagon Reservation, developed areas of Arlington County, and lands under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service. According to the Army, the ANC will exhaust the remaining capacity for interments for eligible veterans within ten years without any expansion. This Final Master Plan contains a number of major initiatives, including a major expansion, to extend the burial capacity of ANC beyond the 2037 planning horizon. KEY INFORMATION • Established in 1864, Arlington National Cemeteries is one of the oldest military cemeteries in the country. • In 2013, ANC expanded with the addition of the Navy Annex site, which is now known as the Southern Expansion. This site is bounded on the south by Interstate 395, on the north by Southgate Road, on the west by the Foxcroft Heights neighborhood and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Maintenance Yard, and on the east by Route 27. • If the Navy Annex site had not been added to Arlington National Cemetery, the remaining capacity for interments for eligible veterans would be exhausted for niche spaces by 2024 and 2025 for in-ground spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary Public-Hearing-9-20-2018.Pdf 2 ES-1 Type of Report
    Draft Environmental Assessment Arlington National Cemetery Southern Expansion Summary of Comments on 2018-08-00_D33S_RPT_ANC-Draft-EA-for- 1 Executive Summary Public-Hearing-9-20-2018.pdf 2 ES-1 Type of Report 3 This Environmental Assessment (EA) evaluates the potential environmental impacts associated with Page: 12 4 Arlington National Cemetery’s (ANC) Proposed Action to establish a single contiguous parcel of land south Author: sfinotti Subject: Cross-Out Date: 09/18/2018 6:31:29 AM 5 of the cemetery by closing and relocating local roadways and developing the parcel to increase interment 6 capacity and increase multimodal transportation capacity on Columbia Pike. This document simultaneously 7 addresses the establishment and development components of this action with the FHWA, VDOT, and Author: sfinotti Subject: Sticky Note Date: 09/21/2018 9:28:45 AM 8 Arlington County as cooperating agencies. The realignment of Columbia Pike is integral to a successful It should say Arlington County. If it must reference the board, then it should say "Arlington County Board", 9 ANC expansion; this EA assesses the potential impacts of the realignment to ensure that the cumulative not "Board of Arlington County" 10 effects of the collective federal actions – roadways and cemetery expansion – are considered. 11 This EA follows regulatory guidance of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969; the 12 Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA (40 Code of Federal 13 Regulations [CFR] 1500-1508); and Environmental Analysis of Army Actions (32 CFR 651). Arlington 14 National Cemetery, a Direct Report Unit of the Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) is the lead 15 agency for the Proposed Action.
    [Show full text]
  • OPNAVINST 5!1B. 6 OM DNS-34 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5510.60M From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: SECURITY REGULATIONS for OFFICES UN
    DEPARTMENTOF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5!1b.I R PLY6 REFER OM TO DNS-34 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5510.60M From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: SECURITY REGULATIONS FOR OFFICES UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS Ref: (a) Executive Order 12958, as amended 25 March 2003 (b) SECNAV M-5510.36, Department of the Navy Information Security Program (ISP) Manual SECNAV M-5510.30, Department of the Navy Personnel Security Program (PSP) Manual SECNAVINST 5239.3A1 Department of the Navy Information Assurance (IA) Policy OPNAVINST 5530.14D1 Navy Physical Security and Law Enforcement USSAN 1-70, United States National Security Authority for NATO (USSAN) Instruction (Industrial Security) (NOTAL) DoD Directive 5210.2, Access to and Dissemination of Restricted Data, 12 Jan 1978 SECNAVINST 5720.42F1 Department of Navy Freedom of Information Act Program CNO ltr 5510 N09N2/8U223000 of 7 Jan 2008, Subj: Updated Policy for "Declassify On" Markings (NOTAL) OPNAVINST 5513.1F1 Department of the Navy Security Classification Guides DoD Manual 5220.22-MI National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, 28 Feb 2006 SECNAV M-5210.1, Department of the Navy Records Management Program, November 2007 OPNAVINST 5511.35L1 Safeguarding Nuclear Command and Control Extremely Sensitive Information SECNAVINST S5460.3F1 Management, Administration, Support, and Oversight of Special Access Programs Within the Department of the Navy (U) NAVSEAINST 5511.32C1 Safeguarding of Naval Nuclear
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Ch. 2, App. G
    Department of Defense Ch. 2, App. G TABLE 3—Continued Number of copies Recipient of DD Loading (Prepared by shipper or Discharge (Prepared by receiv- Type of shipment Form 250–1 Government representative) ing activity) Tanker Barge Tanker Barge On all CONUS loadings ..................... DESC Region(s) 1 ..................... 1 ..................... 1 ..................... 1 cognizant of shipping point. On all shipments to CONUS Destina- DESC Region(s) 1 ..................... 1 ..................... 0 ..................... 0 tions. cognizant of shipping and re- ceiving point.****. For all discharges of cargoes origi- Defense Energy ........................ ........................ 1*** ................ 1*** nating at Defense Energy Support Support Center, Points and discharging at activities ATTN: DESC– not Defense Energy Support Points. BID, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060–6221. * With copy of ullage report. ** Dry tank certificate to accompany DD Form 250–1 and ullage report. *** Copies of the DD Form 250–1, forwarded by bases, will include the following in Block 11: Shipped to: Supplementary Ad- dress, if applicable; Signed Code; and Fund Code. **** See Table 4. TABLE 4—FUEL REGION LOCATIONS AND AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY a. DFR Northeast ........... Defense Fuel Region Northeast, Building 2404, McGuire AFB, NJ 08641–5000. Area of Responsi- Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New bility. Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia. b. DFR Central ............... Defense Fuel Region Central, 8900 S. Broadway, Building 2, St. Louis, MO 63125–1513. Area of Responsi- Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North bility. Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. c. DFR South .................. Defense Fuel Region South, Federal Office Building, 2320 La Branch, Room 1213, Houston, TX 77004–1091.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL EDITION JBM-HH 10-YEAR ANNIVERSARY Pentagram
    SPECIAL EDITION JBM-HH 10-YEAR ANNIVERSARY Pentagram Vol. 63, No. 140 October 3, 2019 home.army.mil/jbmhh Published For Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall Milley takes oath as 20th Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff By Jim Garamone Milley is the 20th chairman since the Defense.gov position was established in 1947. “You can rest assured that I will always Army Gen. Mark A. Milley was sworn provide you informed, candid, impartial in Monday as chairman of the Joint military advice to you, the secretary of Chiefs of Staff in a rain-soaked ceremo- defense, the National Security Council ny on Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall. and to the Congress,” Milley said. President Donald J. Trump, Vice Pres- Milley takes over as the military’s ident Mike Pence, Defense Secretary highest-ranking officer, guiding a force Dr. Mark T. Esper and other officials of 3 million service members. He noted watched as Marine Corps Gen. Joe Dunford swore in his successor. see OATH page 4 PHOTO BY KATRINA WILSON The Color Guard for the event stand together at the 10th anniversary of the base becoming joint. The Soldiers are from the 3rd U.S. Infantry Regiment (The Old Guard) and Marines are from the 8th and I Marine Corps Barracks Washington, D.C. JBM-HH celebrates installation Army, Marine Corps’ realignment By Katrina Wilson and the two continue to cooperate in the The Pentagram present day. Peeple’s provided a history of the base The joint relationship between the becoming joint, which included the col- Army and Marine Corps was celebrated laborative efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Garden Plot & Swat
    More CIA Around the World NCLC: Brownshirts of the Seventies The Great Africa War: Blood test of U.S. Foreign Policy Winter, 1976 Vol. 2, Issue 4 $1.50 The Quarterly Journal of the Organizing Committee for a Fifth Estate GARDENPLOT & SWAT US Police as New Action Army • CounterSpy presents its Ent Letters to the Editor column. We have received some 500 letters in the past month. A cross-section of them appear below. We'd also like to express our thanks to all of you who wrote. couNTERSpy We appreciate the criticism as well as the support. We encourage you to get out your pen and paper and tell us what you think about CounterSpy, the CIA, your local SWAT team, or any other national security issue. The Quarterly Journal of the Organizing Committee for a Fifth Estate I just wanted to drop you a note We work on a farm, On January 8, we sent you a contri- of support on your statement and homesteading. Any contribution has bution of 12,000. A note should have my expression of solidarity with you. been to difficult to come by. But accompanied the check, but we It is quite amazing to watch so- now we'll forsake next Spring's neglected to write it, so here it is now. called critics of the CIA show their replacement plow-points so that We are very glad to send along colors at a time like this. I would Fifth Estate can expose just what this check, as we have been glad to like to take the liberty of pointing ex-agent Welch has been doing to support you over the past few years.
    [Show full text]
  • Pentagon Off Ice Building Complex
    Form No. 10-306 (Rw. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOK NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS a NAME ......... HISTORIC '. : . Pentagon Off ice Building Complex . *. - AND/OR COMMON -. ,- . -. - The ,PBntagon ,, . , . .... , . I ~LOCAT~ONJefferson ~sv& Huy. (Ftt. 110) , . STREET & NUMBER at Interstate..395 .'-::: ; .... ......,, .-.: . I ... '..,.. *,,(., i::; s .. -NOT FOR PUBLICATION . ,. CITY. TOWN . L . ........ ... ......... CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT.'^ ,::. -:.I :,.; i ,. .... ....... , ,' ;Ai-ingt on . T'enth . - VICINITY OF STATE . ,.. :....I........ CODE ., .. COUNTY , , CODE .... virginia . VA Ar1ine;ton ' 013 ... ... CLASSIFICATION . ......... ... ' ., . , :, , . _. ,... # .% ,. .,,. ... >,\, .. .: ...5. # . 8 , ,:, <-.,:. ;.~;, I,, y,, I:, 1 ,,: . .....I I?.. ' , . .* . ' PRESENT USE. ,: CATEGORY .: - : ' ':OWNERSHIP , c STATUS ' ': . ' .... .,., . -DISTRICT . : : '9 XPUBLlC ' ' ' ..' ' ,t ' i LOCCUPIED* , 4GRICULTURE. -MUSEUM XBUILDlNG(S) -PRIVATE -UNOCCUPIED -COMMERCIAL ' '.'-PARK ', . , ,STRUCTURE -BOTH -WORK IN PROGRESS -EDUCATIONAL ,PRIVATE RESIDENCE ,SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE ; . -ENTERTAINMENT -RELIGIOUS , -OBJECT -IN PROCESS XYES: RESTRICTED -GOVERNMENT - -SCIENTIFIC -BEING CONSIDERED ' -YES: UNRESTRICTED -INDUSTRIAL -TRANSPORTATION . '. -NO I... ...XMILITARY -OTHER: REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: ~~fap~t*,~slNational Capital
    [Show full text]
  • D Vietnam Service Report
    Honoring Our Vietnam War and Vietnam Era Veterans February 28, 1961 - May 7, 1975 Town of West Seneca, New York Name: DELECKI Hometown: WEST SENECA THOMAS R. Address: 74 WINDMILL ROAD Vietnam Era Vietnam War Veteran Year Entered: 1969 Service Branch:MARINE CORPS Rank: E-4 Year Discharged: 1971 Unit / Squadron: III MARINE, FLEET MARINE FORCE (FMF) Medals / Citations: NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE RIBBON SHARPSHOOTER BADGE: RIFLE Served in War Zone Theater of Operations / Assignment: Service Notes: Corporal (E-4) Thomas R. Delecki served in Okinawa from 1970 - 1971 and assigned to island mail distibution Base Assignments: Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island (Port Royal Harbor, South Carolina) - Established in November 1861, Parris Island was used as an important base for the Union Navy throughout the Civil War / In October 1915, the principle mission of Parris Island was the training of enlisted Marine recruits / During World War II, approximately 200,000 recruits were trained at Parris Island, including Women Marine Reservists / During the Vietnam War, more than 200,000 recruits trained at Parris Island and training was cut from 12 to 10 weeks to accommodate the number of recruits USMC Headquarters (Quantico, Virginia) - The Marine Corps established Marine Barracks Quantico on 14 May 1917 / Thousands of Marines trained in Quantico during World War I, including units of the much lauded 4th Marine Brigade / In 1941, Quantico’s main task became the education of individual Marines, rather than the large unit training it had conducted in the
    [Show full text]
  • Arlington National Cemetery Real Property Master Plan
    PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY REAL PROPERTY MASTER PLAN FINAL DECEMBER 2014 PREPARED BY: HNTB - ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS UNDER CONTRACT TO: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NORFOLK DISTRICT [This page is left intentionally blank] ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ANC Arlington National Cemetery FCD Federal Consistency Determination ANMC Army National Military Cemeteries FCIP Federal Capital Improvement APA Abbreviated Preliminary Assessment Program APE Area of Potential Effect FEMA Federal Emergency Management AR Army Regulation Agency Army Department of the Army FHWA Federal Highway Administration FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map BMP Best Management Practice FNSI Finding of No Significant Impact BRAC Base Realignment and Closure FOB2 Federal Office Building 2 BRT Bus Rapid Transit GBCI Green Building Certification Institute CAA Clean Air Act GLUP General Land Use Plan CBPA Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act CDG Cemetery Design Guide HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air CEQ Council on Environmental Quality Conditioning CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental HWA Hemlock Wooly Adelgid Response, Compensation, and Liability Act I Interstate CESQG Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity ICRMP Integrated Cultural Resources Generator Management Plan CFA U.S. Commission of Fine Arts IPaC Information, Planning and CFR Code of Federal Regulations Conservation CO Carbon Monoxide IPM Integrated Pest Management CT Census Tract ISWMP Integrated Solid Waste Management CWA Clean Water Act Plan CZMA Coastal Zone Management Act CZMP
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Department Files Civil Action to Support Major Expansion Of
    Case 1:20-cv-00667 Document 1 Filed 06/15/20 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) ) ) 8.929 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, ) SITUATE IN ARLINGTON COUNTY, ) Civil No. 1:20-cv-667 VIRGINIA; ) and ) ) ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA; ) FIBERLIGHT, LLC; VERIZON BUSINESS ) NETWORK SERVICES, INC.; WASHINGTON ) GAS; VERIZON VIRGINIA, LLC; JONES ) UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION, INC.; ) DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER; AND ) UNKNOWN OWNERS, ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ COMPLAINT IN CONDEMNATION 1. This is a civil action brought by the United States of America, at the request of the United States Department of the Army (“Army”), for the taking of land in Arlington County, Virginia, under its power of eminent domain and through a Declaration of Taking, and for the determination and award of just compensation to the owners and parties in interest. 2. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1358. The Court has venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1403. 3. The authority for the acquisition is set forth in Schedule A, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 4. The public purpose for which said property is taken is set forth in Schedule B, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 1 Case 1:20-cv-00667 Document 1 Filed 06/15/20 Page 2 of 11 PageID# 2 5. A legal description of the land taken is set forth in Schedule C, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
    [Show full text]
  • NSF Arlington Transportation Management Program
    NSF Arlington Transportation Management Program Naval District Washington NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK NSF Arlington Transportation Management Program Final February 2014 Prepared for: Prepared by: THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT 6 4.7 Active Commuting Programs (Bicycling and Walking) 47 1.1 Goals and Objectives 6 4.8 Variable Work Schedules 47 1.2 Transportation Management Programs 6 4.9 Guaranteed Ride Home 47 1.3 The Regional Transportation Vision 7 5.0 MASTER PLAN LAND USE PROPOSALS: TRANSPORTATION IMPLICATIONS 48 1.4 NSF Arlington 9 5.1 Anticipated Land Use Changes 48 2.0 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS 12 5.2 Employee Density Implications 48 2.1 Local Bus/Metrorail Services 13 5.3 Trip Generation / Modal Split Impacts 48 2.2 Nearby Transit Hub Centers 18 5.4 Master Plan Parking Supply Impacts 50 2.3 Commuter Rail Service 20 5.5 Multi-modal Provisions 50 2.4 Commuter Bus Service 21 6.0 PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT 52 2.5 Shuttle Service 22 PROGRAM 52 2.6 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities 22 6.1 Employee Transportation Coordinator 57 2.7 Roadways 24 6.2 Parking Management 57 2.8 Gate Counts and Vehicle Classification 26 6.3 Transit Subsidies 57 2.9 Parking 28 6.4 Alternative Work Schedule and Telecommuting 57 2.10 Ridesharing 30 6.5 Shuttle Service 57 2.11 Employee Survey Results 31 6.6 Ridesharing 3.0 AREA PLANNING CONTEXT 41 6.7 Active Commuting Programs (Bicycling and Walking) 58 3.1 Columbia Pike Land Use and Housing Planning Studies
    [Show full text]