DOCSLIB.ORG

Status Report to Congress: the Renovation of the Pentagon, 18Th Edition, March 1, 2008, (Covers CY 2007)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Status Report to Congress: the Renovation of the Pentagon, 18Th Edition, March 1, 2008, (Covers CY 2007) Description of document: Status Report to Congress: The Renovation of the Pentagon, 18th Edition, March 1, 2008, (Covers CY 2007) Requested date: 03-June-2008 Released date: 23-June-2008 Posted date: 23-June-2008 Title of Document A Status Report to Congress The Renovation of the Pentagon Date/date range of document: CY 2007 Source of document: Pentagon Renovation & Construction Program Office 100 Boundary Channel Drive, Arlington, VA 22201 E-mail: [email protected] The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. From: "Hutchins, Lea CTR WHS/PENREN/PARSONS" <[email protected]> Date: 2008/06/23 Mon AM 08:52:17 CDT Subject: RE: 2008 Pentagon Renovation Report You will find the Report attached. Thank you. Lea Hutchins -----Original Message----- Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 9:43 PM Posted To: Renovation (PenRen) Conversation: 2008 Pentagon Renovation Report Subject: 2008 Pentagon Renovation Report Dear Sirs: I am a civilian citizen. Could you please send me a copy of the 2008 Pentagon Renovation Report (March 2008)? A Status Report to Congress The Renovation of the Pentagon Prepared by The Offi ce of the Secretary of Defense March 1, 2008 ANNUAL STATUS REPORT TO CONGRESS March 1, 2008 18th Edition This report is provided to Congress in compliance with Title 10, United States Code, section 2674. The Secretary of Defense is required to submit an annual report on the status of renovations to the Pentagon Reservation. Pentagon renovation includes tenant move-out, demolition and hazardous material abatement, core and shell construction, information technology installation, tenant fit-out, and tenant move in. This is the eighteenth annual report on the Renovation of the Pentagon under 10 USC 2674 and covers CY 2007. In addition, information is included on several related projects that support the overall objectives of the Pentagon Reservation’s operations and maintenance. Status Report to Congress - 1 March 2008 18th Edition 3 MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR The Pentagon Renovation and Construction Program Offi ce (PENREN) sup- ports the Secretary of Defense, Departmental Leadership and other custom- ers in accomplishing its core mission to provide the Pentagon Reservation with safe, secure and high-performing facilities and information technology through renovation, construction, and modernization. It is an historic effort to modernize six-and-a-half million square feet within the 65-year-old struc- ture. After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack, Congress directed acceleration of the Pentagon renovation schedule from the original 2014 planned comple- tion date. Today, the Department of Defense is on course to complete the renovation of Wedges 2-5 by the end of 2011. With the completion of the Sajeel S. Ahmed, Director construction phase in November 2007, Wedge 3 became the fi rst to be fi n- ished under the accelerated schedule. PENREN is currently performing moves, construction or design functions in the two remaining wedges at the same time. Major milestones for 2007 included the completion of Wedge 3, and the return of the Secretary of De- fense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Secretary of the Air Force, and other senior personnel to their original locations. Additionally, the demolition, abatement, design and construction of Wedge 4.1 began in March of 2007, as well as the core and shell design efforts for Wedge 5. Looking ahead, the program plans to complete Wedge 3 moves of approximately 4,000 personnel, fi nish Wedge 4.1, and begin the renovation of Wedge 4.2. Also, both the Center Courtyard Café and Pentagon Memorial will be completed in 2008. PENREN is on schedule to fi nish the Memorial for a September 11, 2008 dedication. The Program’s greatest challenges are managing the aggressive construction schedule, program cost, IT, sequencing, tenant fi t-out, security requirements, integration of multiple trades, and precisely executing tenant moves in a timely manner to complete the renovation of the Pentagon. The concourse build-out, potential impacts of other programs, and ultimately the ending of the Program itself - including budget- ing, personnel, and space - will be a focus of PENREN in the coming years. The Pentagon Renovation and Construction Program Offi ce has continued to provide optimum customer service and remains committed to completing projects on cost and on schedule. The Program’s successes with sustainable construction and delivering a quality product will provide safe, modern, effi cient, and fl exible renovated spaces for the Department of Defense. Sajeel S. Ahmed Director Status Report to Congress - 1 March 2008 18th Edition 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. PROGRAM OVERVIEW Prior to the renovation of Wedge 1, the Pentagon, designated a National Historic Landmark in 1992, had not undergone a major renovation. After more than 60 years of operation and use, renovation was essen- tial in order to meet current health, fire and life-safety codes, and to provide reliable electrical, air-con- ditioning and ventilating services. The passage of time and the cumulative effect of decades of deferred maintenance had left this historic structure in an advanced state of deterioration. The extent of the decay, against a background of steadily increasing operations and maintenance costs, precluded anything less than a total, slab-to-slab renovation. The Pentagon Renovation & Construction Program Office’s (PENREN’s) activities began in 1993 with the building of the Pentagon Heating and Refrigeration Plant. The original completion date for the renovation of Wedges 2-5 was 2014. However, the events of September 11, 2001 made apparent a more immediate need to complete the building’s life-safety and security enhancements. Congress provided for the transfer of $300 million in Fiscal Year 2002 to the Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Revolving Fund (Sec. 305(b), P.L. 107-117, Jan 10, 2002) to finance the accelerated Pentagon renovation and to make command centers more secure. As a result, PENREN will complete renovations 36 to 48 months ahead of the original schedule. PENREN faces complications in completely overhauling the Pentagon, including the presence of as- bestos and other hazardous materials, as well as the need to complete the renovations in an operating facility housing more than 20,000 people who cannot afford interruptions in their daily operations. The Pentagon’s technology infrastructure is no less in need of modernization, a task that rivals the construc- tion effort in size and complexity. The Pentagon was designed prior to the advent of computers. The integration of Information Technology within the Pentagon had necessarily been ad hoc. Advances in technology demanded frequent replace- ments of IT systems. New systems were frequently installed immediately adjacent to, or over the top of, existing systems, which were then frequently abandoned in place. This process, repeated many times, created an incomprehensible tangled mix of multiple cabling systems, many of them abandoned and all of them unmarked. The confusion was not limited to cabling. Computer networks were initially installed by individual ten- ant agencies. This patchwork infrastructure has proven difficult and expensive to maintain. The focus of the Pentagon Information Technology modernization program is to replace multiple existing systems with a single, centrally designed and managed, secure network for all Pentagon tenants. This effort is being conducted concurrently with the brick-and-mortar renovation under a separate contract. Status Report to Congress - 1 March 2008 18th Edition 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. RENOVATION STATUS UPDATE The Pentagon Renovation and Construction Program Office is currently assisting tenants returning to several renovated office spaces. The ongoing tenant moves mark the near completion of Wedge 3, which encompasses 1,055,000 internal gross square feet (IGSF). Construction activities for Wedge 3 concluded in November 2007, with moves completing in March 2008. The demolition and abatement of hazardous materials in Wedge 4, which consists of an area that cov- ers 1,132,000 IGSF, began in March 2007. Wedge 5 is in design and will be complete in the spring of 2011. PENREN continues to implement sustainable construction for Pentagon projects. One sustainable con- struction practice is recycling. The Program’s goal is to divert waste from landfills by recycling construc- tion debris. The Wedge 2-5 project has consistently diverted 50 percent of its construction debris. Additionally, PENREN, with Army support, continues to implement a modernized Enterprise IT infra- structure for the Department of Defense (DoD). Renovation and construction are concurrent with efforts to provide support for voice, data and video capability. The Program’s mission for DoD’s IT enterprise includes providing secure, survivable, manageable IT infrastructure. It is a project that enables continu- ous Pentagon operations. In 2008, the Program will continue to aggressively integrate the requirements, architecture, engineering, implementation, testing, and transition of a complex IT infrastructure for the Pentagon. III. ADDITIONAL EFFORTS PENREN is the construction agent for the Pentagon Memorial Project, a joint effort among various orga- nizations united to construct a memorial commemorating the 184 lives lost at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. Other recently completed and ongoing projects include the new Center Courtyard Café and several small- er efforts, referred to as Ancillary Projects. These projects are approximately 50 percent complete and on schedule for completion in 2008.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ED Recommendation Template
    Executive Director’s Recommendation Commission Meeting: July 9, 2015 PROJECT NCPC FILE NUMBER Final Master Plan MP45 Arlington National Cemetery NCPC MAP FILE NUMBER Arlington County, Virginia 1.61(05.00)44034 SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT’S REQUEST United States Department of Defense Approval of final master plan Department of the Army PROPOSED ACTION REVIEW AUTHORITY Approve as requested Advisory per 40 U.S.C. § 8722(a) and (b)(1) ACTION ITEM TYPE Consent Calendar PROJECT SUMMARY The Department of the Army submitted a Final Real Property Master Plan for Arlington National Cemetery (ANC). ANC is a 624-acre cemetery located in Arlington County, Virginia surrounded by major roadways, Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall (JBM-HH), the Pentagon Reservation, developed areas of Arlington County, and lands under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service. According to the Army, the ANC will exhaust the remaining capacity for interments for eligible veterans within ten years without any expansion. This Final Master Plan contains a number of major initiatives, including a major expansion, to extend the burial capacity of ANC beyond the 2037 planning horizon. KEY INFORMATION • Established in 1864, Arlington National Cemeteries is one of the oldest military cemeteries in the country. • In 2013, ANC expanded with the addition of the Navy Annex site, which is now known as the Southern Expansion. This site is bounded on the south by Interstate 395, on the north by Southgate Road, on the west by the Foxcroft Heights neighborhood and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Maintenance Yard, and on the east by Route 27. • If the Navy Annex site had not been added to Arlington National Cemetery, the remaining capacity for interments for eligible veterans would be exhausted for niche spaces by 2024 and 2025 for in-ground spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary Public-Hearing-9-20-2018.Pdf 2 ES-1 Type of Report
    Draft Environmental Assessment Arlington National Cemetery Southern Expansion Summary of Comments on 2018-08-00_D33S_RPT_ANC-Draft-EA-for- 1 Executive Summary Public-Hearing-9-20-2018.pdf 2 ES-1 Type of Report 3 This Environmental Assessment (EA) evaluates the potential environmental impacts associated with Page: 12 4 Arlington National Cemetery’s (ANC) Proposed Action to establish a single contiguous parcel of land south Author: sfinotti Subject: Cross-Out Date: 09/18/2018 6:31:29 AM 5 of the cemetery by closing and relocating local roadways and developing the parcel to increase interment 6 capacity and increase multimodal transportation capacity on Columbia Pike. This document simultaneously 7 addresses the establishment and development components of this action with the FHWA, VDOT, and Author: sfinotti Subject: Sticky Note Date: 09/21/2018 9:28:45 AM 8 Arlington County as cooperating agencies. The realignment of Columbia Pike is integral to a successful It should say Arlington County. If it must reference the board, then it should say "Arlington County Board", 9 ANC expansion; this EA assesses the potential impacts of the realignment to ensure that the cumulative not "Board of Arlington County" 10 effects of the collective federal actions – roadways and cemetery expansion – are considered. 11 This EA follows regulatory guidance of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969; the 12 Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA (40 Code of Federal 13 Regulations [CFR] 1500-1508); and Environmental Analysis of Army Actions (32 CFR 651). Arlington 14 National Cemetery, a Direct Report Unit of the Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) is the lead 15 agency for the Proposed Action.
    [Show full text]
  • OPNAVINST 5!1B. 6 OM DNS-34 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5510.60M From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: SECURITY REGULATIONS for OFFICES UN
    DEPARTMENTOF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5!1b.I R PLY6 REFER OM TO DNS-34 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5510.60M From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: SECURITY REGULATIONS FOR OFFICES UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS Ref: (a) Executive Order 12958, as amended 25 March 2003 (b) SECNAV M-5510.36, Department of the Navy Information Security Program (ISP) Manual SECNAV M-5510.30, Department of the Navy Personnel Security Program (PSP) Manual SECNAVINST 5239.3A1 Department of the Navy Information Assurance (IA) Policy OPNAVINST 5530.14D1 Navy Physical Security and Law Enforcement USSAN 1-70, United States National Security Authority for NATO (USSAN) Instruction (Industrial Security) (NOTAL) DoD Directive 5210.2, Access to and Dissemination of Restricted Data, 12 Jan 1978 SECNAVINST 5720.42F1 Department of Navy Freedom of Information Act Program CNO ltr 5510 N09N2/8U223000 of 7 Jan 2008, Subj: Updated Policy for "Declassify On" Markings (NOTAL) OPNAVINST 5513.1F1 Department of the Navy Security Classification Guides DoD Manual 5220.22-MI National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, 28 Feb 2006 SECNAV M-5210.1, Department of the Navy Records Management Program, November 2007 OPNAVINST 5511.35L1 Safeguarding Nuclear Command and Control Extremely Sensitive Information SECNAVINST S5460.3F1 Management, Administration, Support, and Oversight of Special Access Programs Within the Department of the Navy (U) NAVSEAINST 5511.32C1 Safeguarding of Naval Nuclear
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Ch. 2, App. G
    Department of Defense Ch. 2, App. G TABLE 3—Continued Number of copies Recipient of DD Loading (Prepared by shipper or Discharge (Prepared by receiv- Type of shipment Form 250–1 Government representative) ing activity) Tanker Barge Tanker Barge On all CONUS loadings ..................... DESC Region(s) 1 ..................... 1 ..................... 1 ..................... 1 cognizant of shipping point. On all shipments to CONUS Destina- DESC Region(s) 1 ..................... 1 ..................... 0 ..................... 0 tions. cognizant of shipping and re- ceiving point.****. For all discharges of cargoes origi- Defense Energy ........................ ........................ 1*** ................ 1*** nating at Defense Energy Support Support Center, Points and discharging at activities ATTN: DESC– not Defense Energy Support Points. BID, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060–6221. * With copy of ullage report. ** Dry tank certificate to accompany DD Form 250–1 and ullage report. *** Copies of the DD Form 250–1, forwarded by bases, will include the following in Block 11: Shipped to: Supplementary Ad- dress, if applicable; Signed Code; and Fund Code. **** See Table 4. TABLE 4—FUEL REGION LOCATIONS AND AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY a. DFR Northeast ........... Defense Fuel Region Northeast, Building 2404, McGuire AFB, NJ 08641–5000. Area of Responsi- Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New bility. Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia. b. DFR Central ............... Defense Fuel Region Central, 8900 S. Broadway, Building 2, St. Louis, MO 63125–1513. Area of Responsi- Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North bility. Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. c. DFR South .................. Defense Fuel Region South, Federal Office Building, 2320 La Branch, Room 1213, Houston, TX 77004–1091.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL EDITION JBM-HH 10-YEAR ANNIVERSARY Pentagram
    SPECIAL EDITION JBM-HH 10-YEAR ANNIVERSARY Pentagram Vol. 63, No. 140 October 3, 2019 home.army.mil/jbmhh Published For Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall Milley takes oath as 20th Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff By Jim Garamone Milley is the 20th chairman since the Defense.gov position was established in 1947. “You can rest assured that I will always Army Gen. Mark A. Milley was sworn provide you informed, candid, impartial in Monday as chairman of the Joint military advice to you, the secretary of Chiefs of Staff in a rain-soaked ceremo- defense, the National Security Council ny on Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall. and to the Congress,” Milley said. President Donald J. Trump, Vice Pres- Milley takes over as the military’s ident Mike Pence, Defense Secretary highest-ranking officer, guiding a force Dr. Mark T. Esper and other officials of 3 million service members. He noted watched as Marine Corps Gen. Joe Dunford swore in his successor. see OATH page 4 PHOTO BY KATRINA WILSON The Color Guard for the event stand together at the 10th anniversary of the base becoming joint. The Soldiers are from the 3rd U.S. Infantry Regiment (The Old Guard) and Marines are from the 8th and I Marine Corps Barracks Washington, D.C. JBM-HH celebrates installation Army, Marine Corps’ realignment By Katrina Wilson and the two continue to cooperate in the The Pentagram present day. Peeple’s provided a history of the base The joint relationship between the becoming joint, which included the col- Army and Marine Corps was celebrated laborative efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Garden Plot & Swat
    More CIA Around the World NCLC: Brownshirts of the Seventies The Great Africa War: Blood test of U.S. Foreign Policy Winter, 1976 Vol. 2, Issue 4 $1.50 The Quarterly Journal of the Organizing Committee for a Fifth Estate GARDENPLOT & SWAT US Police as New Action Army • CounterSpy presents its Ent Letters to the Editor column. We have received some 500 letters in the past month. A cross-section of them appear below. We'd also like to express our thanks to all of you who wrote. couNTERSpy We appreciate the criticism as well as the support. We encourage you to get out your pen and paper and tell us what you think about CounterSpy, the CIA, your local SWAT team, or any other national security issue. The Quarterly Journal of the Organizing Committee for a Fifth Estate I just wanted to drop you a note We work on a farm, On January 8, we sent you a contri- of support on your statement and homesteading. Any contribution has bution of 12,000. A note should have my expression of solidarity with you. been to difficult to come by. But accompanied the check, but we It is quite amazing to watch so- now we'll forsake next Spring's neglected to write it, so here it is now. called critics of the CIA show their replacement plow-points so that We are very glad to send along colors at a time like this. I would Fifth Estate can expose just what this check, as we have been glad to like to take the liberty of pointing ex-agent Welch has been doing to support you over the past few years.
    [Show full text]
  • Pentagon Off Ice Building Complex
    Form No. 10-306 (Rw. 10-74) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOK NATIONAL PARK SERVICE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS a NAME ......... HISTORIC '. : . Pentagon Off ice Building Complex . *. - AND/OR COMMON -. ,- . -. - The ,PBntagon ,, . , . .... , . I ~LOCAT~ONJefferson ~sv& Huy. (Ftt. 110) , . STREET & NUMBER at Interstate..395 .'-::: ; .... ......,, .-.: . I ... '..,.. *,,(., i::; s .. -NOT FOR PUBLICATION . ,. CITY. TOWN . L . ........ ... ......... CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT.'^ ,::. -:.I :,.; i ,. .... ....... , ,' ;Ai-ingt on . T'enth . - VICINITY OF STATE . ,.. :....I........ CODE ., .. COUNTY , , CODE .... virginia . VA Ar1ine;ton ' 013 ... ... CLASSIFICATION . ......... ... ' ., . , :, , . _. ,... # .% ,. .,,. ... >,\, .. .: ...5. # . 8 , ,:, <-.,:. ;.~;, I,, y,, I:, 1 ,,: . .....I I?.. ' , . .* . ' PRESENT USE. ,: CATEGORY .: - : ' ':OWNERSHIP , c STATUS ' ': . ' .... .,., . -DISTRICT . : : '9 XPUBLlC ' ' ' ..' ' ,t ' i LOCCUPIED* , 4GRICULTURE. -MUSEUM XBUILDlNG(S) -PRIVATE -UNOCCUPIED -COMMERCIAL ' '.'-PARK ', . , ,STRUCTURE -BOTH -WORK IN PROGRESS -EDUCATIONAL ,PRIVATE RESIDENCE ,SITE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE ; . -ENTERTAINMENT -RELIGIOUS , -OBJECT -IN PROCESS XYES: RESTRICTED -GOVERNMENT - -SCIENTIFIC -BEING CONSIDERED ' -YES: UNRESTRICTED -INDUSTRIAL -TRANSPORTATION . '. -NO I... ...XMILITARY -OTHER: REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: ~~fap~t*,~slNational Capital
    [Show full text]
  • A Soaring Inspiration, the Air Force Memorial Celebrates Its 10Th Anniversary This Month
    three silvery spires soar the vision of the dedicated group that enough money and win the necessary up, arching and narrowing navigated it from dream to reality. Ten permits to start construction. until they seem to disappear years on, it’s been embraced by the Air The National Park Service led the site in the air. They almost look like contrails, Force, other services, foreign airmen, and design committees on a tour of 18 but they’re stainless steel, not smoke. Yes, and random visitors to the nation’s possible locations in the Washington, you actually can hear aircraft engines— capital alike. D.C., area. The committee liked a usually from airliners approaching nearby “It has become what we had hoped number of them, including a small plot Reagan National Airport. for and expected,” said retired Air Force adjacent to the National Mall, near the This is the US Air Force Memorial Col. Pete Lindquist, who served as Air Smithsonian’s National Air and Space in Arlington, Va., designed to evoke the Force Memorial Foundation director of Museum. They settled, though, on an spectacular grace of fl ight and to honor operations from 1996 to 2012. area of Northern Virginia known as the commitment, heroism, and sacrifi ce Arlington Ridge. of all the men and women who have I N TH E G I N N I N G The site was directly in line with the served the cause of American airpower. The origins of the memorial began in east-west axis of the mall, just across Dedicated Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • D Vietnam Service Report
    Honoring Our Vietnam War and Vietnam Era Veterans February 28, 1961 - May 7, 1975 Town of West Seneca, New York Name: DELECKI Hometown: WEST SENECA THOMAS R. Address: 74 WINDMILL ROAD Vietnam Era Vietnam War Veteran Year Entered: 1969 Service Branch:MARINE CORPS Rank: E-4 Year Discharged: 1971 Unit / Squadron: III MARINE, FLEET MARINE FORCE (FMF) Medals / Citations: NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE RIBBON SHARPSHOOTER BADGE: RIFLE Served in War Zone Theater of Operations / Assignment: Service Notes: Corporal (E-4) Thomas R. Delecki served in Okinawa from 1970 - 1971 and assigned to island mail distibution Base Assignments: Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island (Port Royal Harbor, South Carolina) - Established in November 1861, Parris Island was used as an important base for the Union Navy throughout the Civil War / In October 1915, the principle mission of Parris Island was the training of enlisted Marine recruits / During World War II, approximately 200,000 recruits were trained at Parris Island, including Women Marine Reservists / During the Vietnam War, more than 200,000 recruits trained at Parris Island and training was cut from 12 to 10 weeks to accommodate the number of recruits USMC Headquarters (Quantico, Virginia) - The Marine Corps established Marine Barracks Quantico on 14 May 1917 / Thousands of Marines trained in Quantico during World War I, including units of the much lauded 4th Marine Brigade / In 1941, Quantico’s main task became the education of individual Marines, rather than the large unit training it had conducted in the
    [Show full text]
  • Arlington National Cemetery Real Property Master Plan
    PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY REAL PROPERTY MASTER PLAN FINAL DECEMBER 2014 PREPARED BY: HNTB - ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS UNDER CONTRACT TO: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NORFOLK DISTRICT [This page is left intentionally blank] ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ANC Arlington National Cemetery FCD Federal Consistency Determination ANMC Army National Military Cemeteries FCIP Federal Capital Improvement APA Abbreviated Preliminary Assessment Program APE Area of Potential Effect FEMA Federal Emergency Management AR Army Regulation Agency Army Department of the Army FHWA Federal Highway Administration FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map BMP Best Management Practice FNSI Finding of No Significant Impact BRAC Base Realignment and Closure FOB2 Federal Office Building 2 BRT Bus Rapid Transit GBCI Green Building Certification Institute CAA Clean Air Act GLUP General Land Use Plan CBPA Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act CDG Cemetery Design Guide HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air CEQ Council on Environmental Quality Conditioning CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental HWA Hemlock Wooly Adelgid Response, Compensation, and Liability Act I Interstate CESQG Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity ICRMP Integrated Cultural Resources Generator Management Plan CFA U.S. Commission of Fine Arts IPaC Information, Planning and CFR Code of Federal Regulations Conservation CO Carbon Monoxide IPM Integrated Pest Management CT Census Tract ISWMP Integrated Solid Waste Management CWA Clean Water Act Plan CZMA Coastal Zone Management Act CZMP
    [Show full text]
  • Justice Department Files Civil Action to Support Major Expansion Of
    Case 1:20-cv-00667 Document 1 Filed 06/15/20 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) ) ) 8.929 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, ) SITUATE IN ARLINGTON COUNTY, ) Civil No. 1:20-cv-667 VIRGINIA; ) and ) ) ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA; ) FIBERLIGHT, LLC; VERIZON BUSINESS ) NETWORK SERVICES, INC.; WASHINGTON ) GAS; VERIZON VIRGINIA, LLC; JONES ) UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION, INC.; ) DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER; AND ) UNKNOWN OWNERS, ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ COMPLAINT IN CONDEMNATION 1. This is a civil action brought by the United States of America, at the request of the United States Department of the Army (“Army”), for the taking of land in Arlington County, Virginia, under its power of eminent domain and through a Declaration of Taking, and for the determination and award of just compensation to the owners and parties in interest. 2. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1358. The Court has venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1403. 3. The authority for the acquisition is set forth in Schedule A, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 4. The public purpose for which said property is taken is set forth in Schedule B, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 1 Case 1:20-cv-00667 Document 1 Filed 06/15/20 Page 2 of 11 PageID# 2 5. A legal description of the land taken is set forth in Schedule C, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
    [Show full text]
  • NSF Arlington Transportation Management Program
    NSF Arlington Transportation Management Program Naval District Washington NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK NSF Arlington Transportation Management Program Final February 2014 Prepared for: Prepared by: THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT 6 4.7 Active Commuting Programs (Bicycling and Walking) 47 1.1 Goals and Objectives 6 4.8 Variable Work Schedules 47 1.2 Transportation Management Programs 6 4.9 Guaranteed Ride Home 47 1.3 The Regional Transportation Vision 7 5.0 MASTER PLAN LAND USE PROPOSALS: TRANSPORTATION IMPLICATIONS 48 1.4 NSF Arlington 9 5.1 Anticipated Land Use Changes 48 2.0 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS 12 5.2 Employee Density Implications 48 2.1 Local Bus/Metrorail Services 13 5.3 Trip Generation / Modal Split Impacts 48 2.2 Nearby Transit Hub Centers 18 5.4 Master Plan Parking Supply Impacts 50 2.3 Commuter Rail Service 20 5.5 Multi-modal Provisions 50 2.4 Commuter Bus Service 21 6.0 PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT 52 2.5 Shuttle Service 22 PROGRAM 52 2.6 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities 22 6.1 Employee Transportation Coordinator 57 2.7 Roadways 24 6.2 Parking Management 57 2.8 Gate Counts and Vehicle Classification 26 6.3 Transit Subsidies 57 2.9 Parking 28 6.4 Alternative Work Schedule and Telecommuting 57 2.10 Ridesharing 30 6.5 Shuttle Service 57 2.11 Employee Survey Results 31 6.6 Ridesharing 3.0 AREA PLANNING CONTEXT 41 6.7 Active Commuting Programs (Bicycling and Walking) 58 3.1 Columbia Pike Land Use and Housing Planning Studies
    [Show full text]