DOCSLIB.ORG

DEPARTMENT of the NAVY the Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350 Phone, 703–545–6700

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DEPARTMENT of the NAVY the Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350 Phone, 703–545–6700 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350 Phone, 703–545–6700. Internet, www.navy.mil. SECRETARY OF THE NAVY GORDON R. ENGLAND Director, Office of Program Appraisal REAR ADM. STEVEN G. SMITH, USN Special Assistant for Acquisition and DOUGLAS COMBS Business Reform Under Secretary of the Navy (VACANCY) Director, Small and Disadvantaged Business NANCY J. TARRANT Utilization Auditor General of the Navy RICHARD A. LEACH Director, Naval Criminal Investigative DAVID L. BRANT Service Chief of Information REAR ADM. TERRY L. MCCREARY, USN Chief Information Officer DAVID M. WENNERGREN Chief of Legislative Affairs REAR ADM. BARRY M. COSTELLO, USN General Counsel ALBERTO J. MORA Principal Deputy General Counsel THOMAS F. KRANZ Deputy General Counsel WILLIAM R. MOLZHAN Naval Inspector General VICE ADM. ALBERT T. CHURCH, USN Judge Advocate General of the Navy REAR ADM. MICHAEL F. LOHR, JAGC, USN Deputy Judge Advocate General REAR ADM. JAMES E. MCPHERSON, JAGC, USN Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Financial DIONEL AVILES Management and Comptroller) Principal Deputy GLADYS J. COMMONS Director, Office of Budget REAR ADM. BRUCE B. ENGELHARDT, USN Director, Office of Financial Operations RONALD HAAS Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and WILLIAM A. NAVAS, JR. Reserve Affairs) Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary (VACANCY) (Manpower) Deputy Assistant Secretary (Reserve Affairs) HARVEY C. BARNUM Deputy Assistant Secretary (Personnel ANITA K. BLAIR Programs) Deputy Assistant Secretary (Civilian BETTY S. WELCH Personnel/Equal Employment Opportunity) Director, Naval Council of Personnel Boards CAPT. WILLIAM F. ECKERT, USN Executive Director, Board for Correction of W. DEAN PFEIFFER Naval Records Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Installations HANSFORD (H.T.) JOHNSON and Environment) 179 VerDate Dec 13 2002 15:22 Jul 29, 2004 Jkt 198805 PO 00000 Frm 00187 Fmt 6995 Sfmt 6995 D:\NARA\198805.029 APPS06 PsN: 198805 180 U.S. GOVERNMENT MANUAL Principal Deputy WAYNE ARNY Deputy Assistant Secretary (Installation and DUNCAN HOLADAY Facilities) Deputy Assistant Secretary (Shore Resources) RICHARD O. THOMAS Deputy Assistant Secretary (Safety) CONNIE K. DEWITTE Deputy Assistant Secretary (Environment) DONALD SCHREGARDUS Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research, JOHN J. YOUNG, JR. Development, and Acquisition) Principal Deputy (VACANCY) Deputy Assistant Secretary (Air Programs) (VACANCY) Deputy Assistant Secretary (C41) DALE G. UHLER Deputy Assistant Secretary (Expeditionary BRIG. GEN. CARL JENSEN, USMC Forces) Deputy Assistant Secretary (Mines and CAPT. CLAUDE E. BARRON, USN Undersea Warfare) Deputy Assistant Secretary (Planning, WILLIAM J. SCHAEFER, JR. Programming, and Resources) Deputy Assistant Secretary (Ships) ALLISON STILLER Deputy Assistant Secretary (Integrated ANN SANDEL Warfare Systems) Program Executive Officers/Direct Reporting JOSEPH CIPRIANO; REAR ADM. JOHN Program Managers CHENEVEY, USN; REAR ADM. WILLIAM COBB, USN; REAR ADM. PHIL DAVIS, USN; REAR ADM. DENNIS M. DWYER, USN; REAR ADM. GIB GODWIN, USN; REAR ADM. CHARLES HAMILTON, USN; BRIG. GEN. JOHN HUDSON, USMC; REAR ADM. ROLAND KNAPP, USN; REAR ADM. DENNIS MORRAL, USN; COL. CLAYTON NANS, USMC; REAR ADM. MIKE SHARP, USN U.S. Navy Chief of Naval Operations ADM. VERNON E. CLARK, USN Vice Chief of Naval Operations ADM. MICHAEL G. MULLEN, USN Deputy Chief, Manpower and Personnel VICE ADM. GERALD L. HOEWING, USN Director of Naval Intelligence REAR ADM. RICHARD B. PORTERFIELD, USN Deputy Chief, Fleet Readiness and VICE ADM. CHARLES W. MOORE, Logistics JR., USN Deputy Chief, Plans, Policy and VICE ADM. KEVIN P. GREEN, USN Operations Director of Space, Information Warfare, REAR ADM. STEVEN J. TOMASZESKI, Command, and Control USN Deputy Chief, Warfare Requirements and VICE ADM. JOHN B. NATHMAN, Programs USN Deputy Chief, Resources, Requirements VICE ADM. JAMES C. DAWSON, JR., and Assessments USN Director of Navy Staff VICE ADM. PATRICIA A. TRACEY, USN Director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion ADM. FRANK L. BOWMAN, USN Program VerDate Dec 13 2002 15:22 Jul 29, 2004 Jkt 198805 PO 00000 Frm 00188 Fmt 6995 Sfmt 6995 D:\NARA\198805.029 APPS06 PsN: 198805 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 181 Director of Test and Evaluation and REAR ADM. JAY M. COHEN, USN Technology Requirements Surgeon General of the Navy VICE ADM. MICHAEL L. COWAN, MC, USN Chief of Naval Reserve VICE ADM. JOHN G. COTTON, USN Oceanographer of the Navy REAR ADM. STEVEN J. TOMASZESKI, USN Chief of Chaplains of the Navy/Director of REAR ADM. LOUIS V. IASIELLO, Religious Ministries CHC, USN Major Shore Commands: Commander, Naval Air Systems Command VICE ADM. WALTER B. MASSENBURG, USN Commander, Naval Network and Space REAR ADM. JOHN P. CRYER III, USN Operations Command Commander, Naval Facilities Engineering REAR ADM. MICHAEL K. LOOSE, Command CEC, USN Commander, Naval Legal Service Command REAR ADM. JAMES E. MCPHERSON, JAGC, USN Commander, Naval Meteorology and REAR ADM. TIMOTHY MCGEE, USN, Oceanography Command SELECTEE Commander, Naval Sea Systems Command VICE ADM. PHILLIP M. BALISLE, USN Commander, Naval Security Group Command REAR ADM. JOSEPH D. BURNS, USN Commander, Naval Supply Systems Command REAR ADM. JUSTIN D. MCCARTHY, SC, USN Commander, Space and Naval Warfare REAR ADM. KENNETH D. SLAGHT, Systems Command USN Commander, Naval Warfare Development REAR ADM. JOHN M. KELLY, USN Command Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery VICE ADM. MICHAEL L. COWAN, MC, USN Chief of Naval Education and Training VICE ADM. ALFRED G. HARMS, JR., USN Chief of Naval Personnel VICE ADM. GERALD L. HOEWING, USN Director, Office of Naval Intelligence REAR ADM. RICHARD B. PORTERFIELD, USN Director, Strategic Systems Program REAR ADM. CHARLES B. YOUNG, USN Major Fleet Commands: Commander in Chief, U.S. Atlantic Fleet ADM. WILLIAM J. FALLON, USN Commander in Chief, U.S. Pacific Fleet ADM. WALTER F. DORAN,USN Commander in Chief, U.S. Naval Forces ADM. GREGORY G. JOHNSON, USN Europe Commander, Military Sealift Command REAR ADM. DAVID L. BREWER III, USN Commander, Naval Forces Central Command VICE ADM. DAVID C. NICHOLS, USN Commander, Naval Reserve Force REAR ADM. JOHN P. DEBBOUT, USN Commander, Naval Special Warfare Command REAR ADM. JOSEPH MAGUIRE, USN Commander, Operational Test and Evaluation REAR ADM. DAVID ARCHITZEL, USN Force VerDate Dec 13 2002 15:22 Jul 29, 2004 Jkt 198805 PO 00000 Frm 00189 Fmt 6995 Sfmt 6995 D:\NARA\198805.029 APPS06 PsN: 198805 182 U.S. GOVERNMENT MANUAL U.S. Marine Corps Commandant of the Marine Corps GEN. MICHAEL W. HAGEE, USMC Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps GEN. WILLIAM L. NYLAND, USMC Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps SGT. MAJ. JOHN L. ESTRADA, USMC Director, Marine Corps Staff COL. J.I. MUSCA, USMC Director, Command, Control, BRIG. GEN. JOHN R. THOMAS, Communications, and Computers USMC Deputy Commandant for Aviation LT. GEN. MICHAEL A. HOUGH, USMC Deputy Commandant for Installations and LT. GEN. RICHARD L. KELLY, USMC Logistics Deputy Commandant for Manpower and LT. GEN. GARY L. PARKS, USMC Reserve Affairs Deputy Commandant for Plans, Policies, and LT. GEN. JAN C. HULY, USMC Operations Deputy Commandant for Programs and LT. GEN. ROBERT MAGNUS, USMC Resources Counsel for the Commandant PETER M. MURPHY Director of Administration and Resource ALBERT A. WASHINGTON Management Director of Intelligence, HQMC BRIG. GEN. M.E. ENNIS, USMC Director of Marine Corps History and COL. JOHN W. RIPLEY, USMC (RET.) Museums Director of Public Affairs BRIG. GEN. MARY ANN KRUSA- DOSSIN, USMC Director, Special Projects Directorate JOEL P. EISSINGER, USMC Legislative Assistant to the Commandant MAJ. GEN. SEL. TONY L. CORWIN, USMC Marine Corps Chaplain REAR ADM. LOUIS V. IASIELLO, CHC, USN Marine Corps Dental Officer REAR ADM. CAROL I. TURNER, DC, USN Medical Officer of the Marine Corps REAR ADM. ROBERT D. HUFSTADER, JR., USN President, Permanent Marine Corps Uniform COL. ROY R. BYRD, USMC Board Commanding General, Marine Corps MAJ. GEN. CHRISTOPHER CORTEZ, Recruiting Command USMC Commanding General, Marine Corps Combat LT. GEN. EDWARD HANLON, JR., Development Command USMC Commander, Marine Corps Systems BRIG. GEN. WILLIAM D. CATTO, Commands USMC Commander, Marine Corps Base, Quantico COL. JAMES M. LOWE, USMC [For the Department of the Navy statement of organization, see the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 32, Part 700] The primary mission of the Department of the Navy is to protect the United States, as directed by the President or the Secretary of Defense, by the effective prosecution of war at sea including, with its Marine Corps component, the seizure or defense of advanced naval bases; to support, as required, the forces of all military departments of the United States; and to maintain freedom of the seas. The United States Navy was founded on enacted the first legislation creating the October 13, 1775, when Congress Continental Navy of the American VerDate Dec 13 2002 15:22 Jul 29, 2004 Jkt 198805 PO 00000 Frm 00190 Fmt 6995 Sfmt 6995 D:\NARA\198805.029 APPS06 PsN: 198805 VerDate Dec 132002 15:22 Jul29, 2004 Jkt198805 PO00000 Frm00191 Fmt6995 Sfmt6995 D:\NARA\198805.029 APPS06 PsN:198805 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY SECRETARY OF THE NAVY UNDER SECRETARY CHIEF OF JUDGE ADVOCATE OF THE NAVY NAVAL DIRECTOR CHIEF OF LEGISLATIVE GENERAL INSPECTOR AUDITOR GENERAL PROGRAM INFORMATION AFFAIRS OF THE NAVY GENERAL APPRAISAL ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE (RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND (MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS) (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Status Report to Congress: the Renovation of the Pentagon, 18Th Edition, March 1, 2008, (Covers CY 2007)
    Description of document: Status Report to Congress: The Renovation of the Pentagon, 18th Edition, March 1, 2008, (Covers CY 2007) Requested date: 03-June-2008 Released date: 23-June-2008 Posted date: 23-June-2008 Title of Document A Status Report to Congress The Renovation of the Pentagon Date/date range of document: CY 2007 Source of document: Pentagon Renovation & Construction Program Office 100 Boundary Channel Drive, Arlington, VA 22201 E-mail: [email protected] The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. From: "Hutchins, Lea CTR WHS/PENREN/PARSONS" <[email protected]> Date: 2008/06/23 Mon AM 08:52:17 CDT Subject: RE: 2008 Pentagon Renovation Report You will find the Report attached. Thank you. Lea Hutchins -----Original Message----- Posted At: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 9:43 PM Posted To: Renovation (PenRen) Conversation: 2008 Pentagon Renovation Report Subject: 2008 Pentagon Renovation Report Dear Sirs: I am a civilian citizen.
    [Show full text]
  • ED Recommendation Template
    Executive Director’s Recommendation Commission Meeting: July 9, 2015 PROJECT NCPC FILE NUMBER Final Master Plan MP45 Arlington National Cemetery NCPC MAP FILE NUMBER Arlington County, Virginia 1.61(05.00)44034 SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT’S REQUEST United States Department of Defense Approval of final master plan Department of the Army PROPOSED ACTION REVIEW AUTHORITY Approve as requested Advisory per 40 U.S.C. § 8722(a) and (b)(1) ACTION ITEM TYPE Consent Calendar PROJECT SUMMARY The Department of the Army submitted a Final Real Property Master Plan for Arlington National Cemetery (ANC). ANC is a 624-acre cemetery located in Arlington County, Virginia surrounded by major roadways, Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall (JBM-HH), the Pentagon Reservation, developed areas of Arlington County, and lands under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service. According to the Army, the ANC will exhaust the remaining capacity for interments for eligible veterans within ten years without any expansion. This Final Master Plan contains a number of major initiatives, including a major expansion, to extend the burial capacity of ANC beyond the 2037 planning horizon. KEY INFORMATION • Established in 1864, Arlington National Cemeteries is one of the oldest military cemeteries in the country. • In 2013, ANC expanded with the addition of the Navy Annex site, which is now known as the Southern Expansion. This site is bounded on the south by Interstate 395, on the north by Southgate Road, on the west by the Foxcroft Heights neighborhood and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Maintenance Yard, and on the east by Route 27. • If the Navy Annex site had not been added to Arlington National Cemetery, the remaining capacity for interments for eligible veterans would be exhausted for niche spaces by 2024 and 2025 for in-ground spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Waterways & Civic Engagement
    RECLAIMING THE EDGE urban waterways & civic engagement RECLAIMING THE EDGE urban waterways & civic engagement Reclaiming the Edge: Urban Waterways and Civic Engagement is funded in part by the Smithsonian Institution Women’s Committee, the DC Commission on the Arts & Humanities—an agency supported in part by the National Endowment for the Arts, the Headquarters and Region 3 Offices of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the Cornell Douglas Foundation. Cover Image: Learning to paddle a voyageur canoe on the Anacostia River Photograph by Keith Hyde, US Army Corps of Engineers, 2011 Wilderness Inquiry, Minneapolis, Minnesota Back Image: Earth Day, Washington, DC, 2012 Photograph by Susana A. Raab, Anacostia Community Museum Director’s Statement Reclaiming the Edge: Urban to that density have turned rivers from pristine waterways Waterways and Civic Engagement of fresh waters into murky, polluted tributaries creating is the Smithsonian Anacostia challenges for public health. It examines how rivers, natural Community Museum’s 45th borders, and barriers have contributed to economic, anniversary exhibition and racial, and social segregation. The exhibit spotlights the marks the official public launch diversity of the folk culture spawned by river communities. of the museum’s new mission— It explores new experiences in city planning and waterfront to challenge perceptions, development and assesses the role the river plays in wildness Photograph by John Francis Ficara broaden perspectives, generate and an environmental “place” within the urban experience. new knowledge, and deepen This exhibition will not only help audiences understand the understanding about the ever-changing concepts and realities American experience but also foster understanding and of “community.” This exhibition moves ACM into a new era of sustenance of a biodiverse planet.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Navy Looks at Its African American Crewmen, 1755-1955
    “MANY OF THEM ARE AMONG MY BEST MEN”: THE UNITED STATES NAVY LOOKS AT ITS AFRICAN AMERICAN CREWMEN, 1755-1955 by MICHAEL SHAWN DAVIS B.A., Brooklyn College, City University of New York, 1991 M.A., Kansas State University, 1995 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of History College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2011 Abstract Historians of the integration of the American military and African American military participation have argued that the post-World War II period was the critical period for the integration of the U.S. Navy. This dissertation argues that World War II was “the” critical period for the integration of the Navy because, in addition to forcing the Navy to change its racial policy, the war altered the Navy’s attitudes towards its African American personnel. African Americans have a long history in the U.S. Navy. In the period between the French and Indian War and the Civil War, African Americans served in the Navy because whites would not. This is especially true of the peacetime service, where conditions, pay, and discipline dissuaded most whites from enlisting. During the Civil War, a substantial number of escaped slaves and other African Americans served. Reliance on racially integrated crews survived beyond the Civil War and the abolition of slavery, only to succumb to the principle of “separate but equal,” validated by the Supreme Court in the Plessy case (1896). As racial segregation took hold and the era of “Jim Crow” began, the Navy separated the races, a task completed by the time America entered World War I.
    [Show full text]
  • After Action Report Washington Navy Yard September 16, 2013
    AFTER ACTION REPORT WASHINGTON NAVY YARD SEPTEMBER 16, 2013 INTERNAL REVIEW OF THE METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. JULY 2014 SHOOTING AT THE WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, SEPTEMBER 16, 2013 METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) is the primary law enforcement agency for the District of Columbia. The MPD has over 4,000 sworn and 500 civilian members serving the city. MISSION OF THE METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT It is the mission of the Metropolitan Police Department to safeguard the District of Columbia and protect its residents and visitors by providing the highest quality of police service with integrity, compassion, and a commitment to innovation that integrates people, technology and progressive business systems. www.mpdc.dc.gov 1 | AFTER ACTION REPORT OF THE METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT INTERNAL REVIEW TEAM SHOOTING AT THE WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, SEPTEMBER 16, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 3 PURPOSE OF REVIEW .................................................................................................... 5 SCOPE OF REVIEW ....................................................................................................... 6 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 7 BACKGROUND............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Few Americans in the 1790S Would Have Predicted That the Subject Of
    AMERICAN NAVAL POLICY IN AN AGE OF ATLANTIC WARFARE: A CONSENSUS BROKEN AND REFORGED, 1783-1816 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jeffrey J. Seiken, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor John Guilmartin, Jr., Advisor Professor Margaret Newell _______________________ Professor Mark Grimsley Advisor History Graduate Program ABSTRACT In the 1780s, there was broad agreement among American revolutionaries like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton about the need for a strong national navy. This consensus, however, collapsed as a result of the partisan strife of the 1790s. The Federalist Party embraced the strategic rationale laid out by naval boosters in the previous decade, namely that only a powerful, seagoing battle fleet offered a viable means of defending the nation's vulnerable ports and harbors. Federalists also believed a navy was necessary to protect America's burgeoning trade with overseas markets. Republicans did not dispute the desirability of the Federalist goals, but they disagreed sharply with their political opponents about the wisdom of depending on a navy to achieve these ends. In place of a navy, the Republicans with Jefferson and Madison at the lead championed an altogether different prescription for national security and commercial growth: economic coercion. The Federalists won most of the legislative confrontations of the 1790s. But their very success contributed to the party's decisive defeat in the election of 1800 and the abandonment of their plans to create a strong blue water navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary Public-Hearing-9-20-2018.Pdf 2 ES-1 Type of Report
    Draft Environmental Assessment Arlington National Cemetery Southern Expansion Summary of Comments on 2018-08-00_D33S_RPT_ANC-Draft-EA-for- 1 Executive Summary Public-Hearing-9-20-2018.pdf 2 ES-1 Type of Report 3 This Environmental Assessment (EA) evaluates the potential environmental impacts associated with Page: 12 4 Arlington National Cemetery’s (ANC) Proposed Action to establish a single contiguous parcel of land south Author: sfinotti Subject: Cross-Out Date: 09/18/2018 6:31:29 AM 5 of the cemetery by closing and relocating local roadways and developing the parcel to increase interment 6 capacity and increase multimodal transportation capacity on Columbia Pike. This document simultaneously 7 addresses the establishment and development components of this action with the FHWA, VDOT, and Author: sfinotti Subject: Sticky Note Date: 09/21/2018 9:28:45 AM 8 Arlington County as cooperating agencies. The realignment of Columbia Pike is integral to a successful It should say Arlington County. If it must reference the board, then it should say "Arlington County Board", 9 ANC expansion; this EA assesses the potential impacts of the realignment to ensure that the cumulative not "Board of Arlington County" 10 effects of the collective federal actions – roadways and cemetery expansion – are considered. 11 This EA follows regulatory guidance of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969; the 12 Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA (40 Code of Federal 13 Regulations [CFR] 1500-1508); and Environmental Analysis of Army Actions (32 CFR 651). Arlington 14 National Cemetery, a Direct Report Unit of the Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) is the lead 15 agency for the Proposed Action.
    [Show full text]
  • Rear Admiral Charles H. Stockton, the Naval War College, and the Law of Naval Warfare
    Rear Admiral Charles H. Stockton, the Naval War College, and the Law of Naval Warfare John Hattendorf INCE ITS FOUNDING IN 1884, the U.S. Naval War College has played a § role in the study and formulation of the law of armed conflict. Many distinguished scholars and lawyers have taught, researched, and written studies in this field at the College. The roll call of its professors of international law includes such distinguished scholars as John Bassett Moore, George Grafton Wilson, Manley o. Hudson, Hans Kelsen, Thomas Mallison, and Howard Levie. Many of the most well~known names are those of scholars who held the position as a parHime appointment and worked at the Naval War College for a few months each year, while also holding chairs at major civilian universities. This policy changed only in July 1951, when the Secretary of the Navy created the College's first two full~time civilian academic appointments: a professor of history and a professor of international law. For many years both were normally held by visiting scholars for a one or two~year period. On 6 October 1967 the College named the law position the Charles H. Stockton Chair ofInternational Law.1 In attaching the name of Stockton to one of its oldest and most prestigious academic chairs, the Naval War College remembered a naval officer who was a key figure in its own institutional history as well as an important figure in the development of the law of naval warfare. Today, the prestigious Stockton Chair at the Naval War College, and Stockton Hall, the home of the Law School at The George Washington University in Stockton, the War College and the Law Washington, D.C., are the principal tokens of his memory and his achievements.
    [Show full text]
  • OPNAVINST 5!1B. 6 OM DNS-34 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5510.60M From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: SECURITY REGULATIONS for OFFICES UN
    DEPARTMENTOF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20350-2000 OPNAVINST 5!1b.I R PLY6 REFER OM TO DNS-34 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5510.60M From: Chief of Naval Operations Subj: SECURITY REGULATIONS FOR OFFICES UNDER THE COGNIZANCE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS Ref: (a) Executive Order 12958, as amended 25 March 2003 (b) SECNAV M-5510.36, Department of the Navy Information Security Program (ISP) Manual SECNAV M-5510.30, Department of the Navy Personnel Security Program (PSP) Manual SECNAVINST 5239.3A1 Department of the Navy Information Assurance (IA) Policy OPNAVINST 5530.14D1 Navy Physical Security and Law Enforcement USSAN 1-70, United States National Security Authority for NATO (USSAN) Instruction (Industrial Security) (NOTAL) DoD Directive 5210.2, Access to and Dissemination of Restricted Data, 12 Jan 1978 SECNAVINST 5720.42F1 Department of Navy Freedom of Information Act Program CNO ltr 5510 N09N2/8U223000 of 7 Jan 2008, Subj: Updated Policy for "Declassify On" Markings (NOTAL) OPNAVINST 5513.1F1 Department of the Navy Security Classification Guides DoD Manual 5220.22-MI National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, 28 Feb 2006 SECNAV M-5210.1, Department of the Navy Records Management Program, November 2007 OPNAVINST 5511.35L1 Safeguarding Nuclear Command and Control Extremely Sensitive Information SECNAVINST S5460.3F1 Management, Administration, Support, and Oversight of Special Access Programs Within the Department of the Navy (U) NAVSEAINST 5511.32C1 Safeguarding of Naval Nuclear
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Ch. 2, App. G
    Department of Defense Ch. 2, App. G TABLE 3—Continued Number of copies Recipient of DD Loading (Prepared by shipper or Discharge (Prepared by receiv- Type of shipment Form 250–1 Government representative) ing activity) Tanker Barge Tanker Barge On all CONUS loadings ..................... DESC Region(s) 1 ..................... 1 ..................... 1 ..................... 1 cognizant of shipping point. On all shipments to CONUS Destina- DESC Region(s) 1 ..................... 1 ..................... 0 ..................... 0 tions. cognizant of shipping and re- ceiving point.****. For all discharges of cargoes origi- Defense Energy ........................ ........................ 1*** ................ 1*** nating at Defense Energy Support Support Center, Points and discharging at activities ATTN: DESC– not Defense Energy Support Points. BID, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060–6221. * With copy of ullage report. ** Dry tank certificate to accompany DD Form 250–1 and ullage report. *** Copies of the DD Form 250–1, forwarded by bases, will include the following in Block 11: Shipped to: Supplementary Ad- dress, if applicable; Signed Code; and Fund Code. **** See Table 4. TABLE 4—FUEL REGION LOCATIONS AND AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY a. DFR Northeast ........... Defense Fuel Region Northeast, Building 2404, McGuire AFB, NJ 08641–5000. Area of Responsi- Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New bility. Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia. b. DFR Central ............... Defense Fuel Region Central, 8900 S. Broadway, Building 2, St. Louis, MO 63125–1513. Area of Responsi- Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North bility. Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. c. DFR South .................. Defense Fuel Region South, Federal Office Building, 2320 La Branch, Room 1213, Houston, TX 77004–1091.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL EDITION JBM-HH 10-YEAR ANNIVERSARY Pentagram
    SPECIAL EDITION JBM-HH 10-YEAR ANNIVERSARY Pentagram Vol. 63, No. 140 October 3, 2019 home.army.mil/jbmhh Published For Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall Milley takes oath as 20th Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff By Jim Garamone Milley is the 20th chairman since the Defense.gov position was established in 1947. “You can rest assured that I will always Army Gen. Mark A. Milley was sworn provide you informed, candid, impartial in Monday as chairman of the Joint military advice to you, the secretary of Chiefs of Staff in a rain-soaked ceremo- defense, the National Security Council ny on Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall. and to the Congress,” Milley said. President Donald J. Trump, Vice Pres- Milley takes over as the military’s ident Mike Pence, Defense Secretary highest-ranking officer, guiding a force Dr. Mark T. Esper and other officials of 3 million service members. He noted watched as Marine Corps Gen. Joe Dunford swore in his successor. see OATH page 4 PHOTO BY KATRINA WILSON The Color Guard for the event stand together at the 10th anniversary of the base becoming joint. The Soldiers are from the 3rd U.S. Infantry Regiment (The Old Guard) and Marines are from the 8th and I Marine Corps Barracks Washington, D.C. JBM-HH celebrates installation Army, Marine Corps’ realignment By Katrina Wilson and the two continue to cooperate in the The Pentagram present day. Peeple’s provided a history of the base The joint relationship between the becoming joint, which included the col- Army and Marine Corps was celebrated laborative efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Navy Fiscal Year 2016 Schedule of Budgetary Activity
    AMERICA’S AWAY TEAM Table of Contents 1.0 Message from the ASN (FM&C) ................................................................................... 2 2.0 Management’s Discussion and Analysis ...................................................................... 4 2.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Mission and Organization Structure................................................................................... 6 2.3 Analysis of the Schedule of Budgetary Activity ............................................................... 14 2.4 Systems, Control, and Legal Compliance ......................................................................... 19 2.5 Looking Forward .............................................................................................................. 26 2.6 Goals and the Supporting Financial System Strategies .................................................... 28 2.7 Other Management Information, Initiatives, and Issues ................................................. 29 2.8 Limitations of the Schedule of Budgetary Activity ........................................................... 29 3.0 Audit Opinion ........................................................................................................... 31 4.0 Financial Section ....................................................................................................... 56 4.1 Schedule of Budgetary Activity .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]