DOCSLIB.ORG

F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program Updated May 27, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL30563 F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program Summary The largest procurement program in the Department of Defense (DOD), the F-35 Lightning II is a strike fighter aircraft being procured in different versions for the United States Air Force, Marine Corps, and Navy. Current DOD plans call for acquiring a total of 2,456 F-35s. Allies are expected to purchase hundreds of additional F-35s, and eight nations are cost-sharing partners in the program with the United States. The F-35 promises significant advances in military capability. Like many high-technology programs before it, reaching that capability has put the program above its original budget and behind the planned schedule. The Administration’s proposed FY2021 defense budget requested about $11.4 billion in procurement funding for the F-35 program. This would fund the procurement of 48 F-35As for the Air Force, 10 F-35Bs for the Marine Corps, 20 F-35Cs for the Navy and Marines, advance procurement for future aircraft, and continuing modifications. The proposed budget also requested about $1.7 billion for F-35 research and development. FY2020 defense authorization act: The FY2020 defense authorization bill funded F-35 procurement at $10.9 billion for 90 aircraft (60 F-35As, 10 F-35Bs, and 20 F-35Cs, an increase of 11 aircraft and decrease of $0.5 billion from the Administration’s request), including $1.4 billion in advance procurement, the requested level. The joint explanatory statement accompanying the bill included language authorizing economic order quantity contracting and buy-to-budget acquisition, allowing the purchase of more than the authorized number of F-35s if that procurement would not require additional funds and would mitigate any negative cost and schedule impacts from the actions or decisions of foreign partners or customers (e.g., reduction in purchased quantities); requiring the Secretary of Defense to seek compensation from the F-35 contractor for costs related to the failure to deliver ready-for-issue spare parts; restricting the transfer of F-35 aircraft, technology, support equipment, and other assets to Turkey, unless certain conditions are met; requiring certification that support equipment needed to absorb F-35s formerly intended for Turkey into the U.S. fleet will be procured prior to taking possession of those jets; requiring a competitive analysis among various methods to improve the F-35’s Autonomic Logistics Information System; requiring the F-35 Joint Program Office (JPO) to provide sustainment cost data as part of existing quarterly briefings to the congressional defense committees; reporting on the progress and performance of the F-35 aircraft program (§166); mandating reports on an integrated master schedule and past performance assessment for each planned phase of F-35 Block 4 and C2D2 upgrades, F-35 reliability and maintainability metrics, Block 4 capability development and fielding activities, and modernization and upgrade plans for the F-35 Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS), and the steps being taken to improve accountability of F–35 parts within the supply chain. Congressional Research Service F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program FY2020 defense appropriations bill: The final omnibus budget bill funded F-35 procurement at $11.1 billion for 98 aircraft (62 F-35As, 16 F-35Bs, and 20 F-35Cs, an increase of 20 aircraft and $.3 billion below the Administration’s request), including $1.4 billion in advance procurement, the requested level. The joint explanatory statement accompanying the bill included language restricting funds to deliver F-35s or related equipment to Turkey, except in accordance with Section 1245 of the FY2020 National Defense Authorization Act; designating savings resulting from F-35 cost reductions to fund alternate sourcing of F-35 parts manufactured in Turkey and to convert F-35As previously designated for Turkey for United States Air Force use; requiring a certification that the Department of Defense has submitted a formal request for proposal (RFP) for provisioning and cataloguing F-35 cost data; and allowing modification of up to six F–35s to a test configuration. Congressional Research Service F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 In General .................................................................................................................................. 1 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1 The F-35 in Brief ....................................................................................................................... 1 In General ........................................................................................................................... 1 Three Service Versions ....................................................................................................... 2 Engine ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Current Program Status ............................................................................................................. 5 Recent Developments ................................................................................................................ 5 Lots 12-14 Agreed To ......................................................................................................... 5 COVID-19-Related Production Slowdown ........................................................................ 6 Proposed Multiyear Procurement ....................................................................................... 6 Potential Change in Marine Corps Procurement ................................................................. 6 Changes in International Orders ......................................................................................... 7 Devolution of Joint Program Office .................................................................................... 8 Testing Progress .................................................................................................................. 9 Sustainment Cost Issues ...................................................................................................... 9 Summary of Program History ................................................................................................. 10 F-35 Program Origin and History ............................................................................................ 11 February 2010 Program Restructuring .............................................................................. 13 March 2010 Nunn-McCurdy Breach ................................................................................ 13 February 2012 Procurement Stretch ................................................................................. 14 Initial Operational Capability ........................................................................................... 14 End of System Development and Demonstration/Entry into IOT&E ............................... 15 Procurement Quantities ........................................................................................................... 16 Planned Total Quantities ................................................................................................... 16 Annual Quantities ............................................................................................................. 16 Low-Rate Initial Production ............................................................................................. 17 F-35 Block Buy ................................................................................................................. 18 Program Management ............................................................................................................. 19 Software Development ............................................................................................................ 20 C2D2 Program .................................................................................................................. 21 Autonomic Logistics Information System ........................................................................ 23 Dual Capability ................................................................................................................. 24 Cost and Funding .................................................................................................................... 25 Total Program Acquisition Cost ........................................................................................ 25 Prior-Year Funding............................................................................................................ 25 Unit Costs ......................................................................................................................... 25 Other Cost Issues..................................................................................................................... 26 Acquisition Cost and Long-Term Affordability ................................................................ 26 Unit Cost Projections .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thanks a Million, Tornado
    Aug 11 Issue 39 desthe magazine for defenceider equipment and support Thanks a million, Tornado Fast jets in focus − Typhoon and Tornado impress See inside Welcome Warrior Goliath’s The future Warfare goes Voyager returns to war giant task is now on screen lockheedmartin.com/f35 NOT JUSTAN AIRCRAFT, THE UK’SAIRCRAFT The F-35 Lightning II isn’t just a cutting-edge aircraft. It also demonstrates the power of collaboration. Today, a host of UK companies are playing their part in developing and building this next-generation F-35 fi ghter. The F-35 programme is creating thousands of jobs throughout the country, as well as contributing LIGHTNINGLIGHTNING IIII to UK industrial and economic development. It’s enhancing the UK’s ability to compete in the global technology marketplace. F-35 Lightning II. Delivering prosperity and security. UNITED KINGDOM THE F-35 LIGHTNING II TEAM NORTHROP GRUMMAN BAE SYSTEMS PRATT & WHITNEY LOCKHEED MARTIN 301-61505_NotJust_Desider.indd 1 7/14/11 2:12 PM FRONTISPIECE 3 lockheedmartin.com/f35 Jackal helps keep the peace JACKAL CUTS a dash on Highway 1 between Kabul and Kandahar, one of the most important routes in Afghanistan. Soldiers from the 9th/12th Royal Lancers have been helping to keep open a section of the road which locals use to transport anything from camels to cars. The men from the Lancers have the tough task of keeping the highway open along with members of 2 Kandak of the Afghan National Army, who man checkpoints along the road. NOT JUSTAN AIRCRAFT, Picture: Sergeant Alison Baskerville, Royal Logistic Corps THE UK’SAIRCRAFT The F-35 Lightning II isn’t just a cutting-edge aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Coproduce Or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Brazilian Political Science Review, Vol
    Brazilian Political Science Review ISSN: 1981-3821 Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política Svartman, Eduardo Munhoz; Teixeira, Anderson Matos Coproduce or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Brazilian Political Science Review, vol. 12, no. 1, e0005, 2018 Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201800010005 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=394357143004 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Coproduce or Codevelop Military Aircraft? Analysis of Models Applicable to USAN* Eduardo Munhoz Svartman Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Anderson Matos Teixeira Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil The creation of the Union of South American Nations (USAN) aroused expectations about joint development and production of military aircraft in South America. However, political divergences, technological asymmetries and budgetary problems made projects canceled. Faced with the impasse, this article approaches features of two military aircraft development experiences and their links with the regionalization processes to extract elements that help to account for the problems faced by USAN. The processes of adoption of the F-104 and the Tornado in the 1950s and 1970s by countries that later joined the European Union are analyzed in a comparative perspective. The two projects are compared about the political and diplomatic implications (mutual trust, military capabilities and regionalization) and the economic implications (scale of production, value chains and industrial parks).
    [Show full text]
  • EFC JIP CBRN Workshop
    EFC JIP CBRN Workshop Finmeccanica areas of interest Michele Genisio Brussels - September 15, 2011 Contents Contents 1. Finmeccanica key data 2010 2. Proposed areas of investigation Commercial in Confidence 1 - Finmeccanica Key Data 2010 FY2010 FY2009 Net Profit 557 M€ 718 M€ Revenues € 18.695 m Order Intake 22,5 B€ 21,1 B€ Employees 75,197 73,056 R & D 2.0 B€ 1.98 B€ DEFENSE AND DEFENSE AERONAUTICS HELICOPTERS TRANSPORT ENERGY SPACE SECURITY SYSTEMS ELECTRONICS 2.809 M€ 3.644 M€ 1.962 M€ 7.137 M€ 1.210 M€ 1.413 M€ 925 M€ . Alenia Aeronautica . AgustaWestland . AnsaldoBreda . DRS Technologies . Oto Melara . Ansaldo Energia . Telespazio . Alenia Aermacchi . BAAC . Ansaldo STS . ElsagDatamat . WASS . Ansaldo Fuel Cells . Thales Alenia Space . SuperJet . BredaMenarini . Selex . MBDA . Ansaldo Nucleare Communications International bus . Selex Galileo . ATR . Selex Sistemi . Eurofighter GmbH Integrati 100% owned by Finmeccanica . Selex Service Management JVs Finmeccanica view Emerging requirements in the CBRN area: C and B detectors • Wide threat range • Speed of Response • Low Detection Levels • Threat Identification M&S of CBRN architectures • representing the whole process, from threat to recovery • enabling military-civil interaction • multi-threat scenarios. M&S of CBRN Architectures OBJECTIVES Modelling & Simulation of a CBRN Architecture representing: - Environment: both predictable (terrain characteristics, urban context, road network, etc) and unpredictable (crowd behaviour, humand behaviour, weather etc ) aspects - Responders:
    [Show full text]
  • Global Defense Procurement and the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter by Bert Chapman (Review)
    Global Defense Procurement and the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter by Bert Chapman (review) Steven J. Childs Journal of Advanced Military Studies, Volume 11, Number 1, 2020, pp. 242-245 (Review) Published by Marine Corps University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/796228/summary [ Access provided at 24 Sep 2021 09:31 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Journal of Advanced Military Studies Global Defense Procurement and the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. By Bert Chapman. Basel, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. Pp. 396. $99.99 (hardcover); $79.99 (ebook). The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) is among the most controversial U.S. defense procurement programs in Pentagon history. Originally envisioned as the more affordable “lo” to the “hi” of the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor, the system reflects the culmination of the Department of Defense’s culture of “jointness,” but in procurement rather than operations. From the program’s onset, it has been an ambitious endeavor to replace four at- tack and fighter aircraft models used by the Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps with a single airframe, and with variants designed to operate from convention- al runways, aircraft carriers, and helicopter carriers or forward locations using short takeoff and vertical landing capability. As a fifth-generation fighter, this stealth airframe features internal weapons carriage and incorporates advances in fusing information through its sensor suite. On top of it all, the program relies heavily on international cooperation in the production process through a tiered partner arrangement.
    [Show full text]
  • Airbus Use of Nadcap EASA Workshop – May 10, 2011
    Commodity – Siglum - Reference Date Airbus Use of Nadcap EASA Workshop – May 10, 2011 Presented by Pascal Blondet - PDQC Use menu "View - Header & Footer" for Presentation title - Siglum - Reference month 200X Summary 1. What is Nadcap? 2. How Airbus is controlling Nadcap? Page 2 © AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Use menu "View - Header & Footer" for Presentation title - Siglum - Reference month 200X Summary 1. What is Nadcap? 2. How Airbus is controlling Nadcap? Page 3 © AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Use menu "View - Header & Footer" for Presentation title - Siglum - Reference month 200X What is Nadcap? The leading, worldwide cooperative program of major companies designed to manage a cost effective consensus approach to special processes and products and provide continual improvement within the aerospace industry by • Promoting and supporting common standards worldwide • Implementing common auditing and accreditation process More than 60 Subscribing Primes (50% Americas, 50% Europe) More than 4 000 Audits conducted per year More than 4200 active supplier/process accreditations About 80 Auditors (FTE) Page 4 © AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Use menu "View - Header & Footer" for Presentation title - Siglum - Reference month 200X Nadcap Commodities Special Processes • Nondestructive Testing (NDT) • Metallic Material Testing Laboratories (MTL) • Non Metallic Material Testing Laboratories (NMMT) • Heat Treating (HT) • Coatings (CT) • Chemical Processing (CP) • Welding (WLD) • Nonconventional Machining & Surface Enhancement (NMSE) Systems & Products including Special Processes • Sealants (SLT) • Distributors (DIST) • Aerospace Quality Management Systems (AQS) • Fluid Distribution Standards (FLU) • Elastomer Seals (SEALS) • Composites (COMP) Already mandated by Airbus • Electronics (ETG) Airbus engagement in Nadcap TGs but not yet mandated No Airbus engagement to date Page 5 © AIRBUS S.A.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ATR Appoints New Head of Communications
    Toulouse, 7th May 2015 ATR appoints new Head of Communications Palmira Rotolo has been appointed as new Head of Communications of world’s leading turboprop manufacturer ATR. In her new position, she will be in charge of coordinating activities in the fields of Events, Brand Image, and both Internal and External Communications. Mrs.Rotolo has held a number of successive different positions within Alenia Aermacchi (previously Alenia Aeronautica), Superjet International, Finmeccanica and ATR. Since 2014, she was Head of Marketing Communication at Alenia Aermacchi. Previously, she had took the position of Head of Communication and Image (2012-2014), Deputy Head of Human Resources International (2010- 2012) and Head of International Communication (2007-2010), all of them also at Alenia Aermacchi. Before this, among other positions, she had been CEO Public Relations assistant while making part of the Task Force Team for the launch of SuperJet International (2006-2007), and she had managed Events at Finmeccanica (2004-2005). Mrs.Rotolo has an extensive knowledge of ATR, where she had already worked between 1992 and 2003, being successively in charge of External Relations, Public Relations and Exhibitions. She helds a Degree in Social Science from LUMSA University in Rome, Italy, and a Degree in Trainee Officer for mercantile shipping. About ATR: ATR is the world leader on the market for regional aircraft. Known for its exemplary eco-responsibility, ATR is a role model for airlines, not only in terms of its performance and reliability, but also in terms of profitability on short-haul air routes. ATR is ISO 14001 certified. Its aircraft are currently operated by more than 180 airlines in over 90 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges for European Aerospace Suppliers Contents Introduction 3
    Aviation, Aerospace & Defense CHALLENGES FOR EUROPEAN AEROSPACE SUPPLIERS CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 MANAGING GROWTH AND NEW CHALLENGES 4 European aerospace suppliers’ challenges 5 DEVELOPING A ROBUST AND AGILE SUPPLY CHAIN 6 What should OEMs and suppliers do? 8 DEVELOPING THE FOOTPRINT 9 Extending the footprint to new geographies 9 Managing the footprint extension 9 BOOSTING INNOVATION 11 Development of composite materials 11 Toward 100 percent electric aircraft 12 Improving innovation and development performance 15 CONCLUSIONS 15 INTRODUCTION Airlines around the world are ordering new planes and demanding new technology. As a result, the global aerospace industry is growing and aerospace suppliers must become more innovative and flexible to keep up. The industry faces three main challenges in the next decade, according to a study conducted by Oliver Wyman of the European aerospace industry. Suppliers must: • Design and develop more complex parts and systems, with higher technology content, shorter lead times, and at a competitive cost • Extend their supply chain footprint to emerging markets • Upgrade production capabilities and share more financial and operational risks with original equipment manufacturers These challenges will have a direct impact on supply chain management, which thus must become more robust and agile. They also come at a time when the industry must deal with a number of exogenous issues. Market demand is growing continuously for both original equipment and spare parts, while airlines are asking for increasing diversity in aircraft models. The industry faces new competition from emerging countries, OEMs are creating an international supply base, and regulators are writing stronger environmental and noise rules for aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Named Beneficiaries - Members of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking and Budgeted JU Contribution
    List of Named Beneficiaries - Members of the Clean Sky Joint Undertaking and budgeted JU contribution ECO-DESIGN Budgeted 2008- Budgeted 2009-JU Budgeted 2010-JU Budgeted 2011- Beneficiaries Country JU contribution contribution contribution JU contribution DAV DASSAULT AVIATION France € 95,000.00 € 1,411,100.00 € 1,305,000.00 € 652,500.00 FhG Fraunhofer Germany € 145,900.00 € 943,593.75 € 1,069,165.00 € 534,582.50 AIRBUS SAS France € 500.00 € 0.00 € 1,833.50 € 916.75 AIRBUS OPERATIONS France France € 15,750.00 € 82,550.00 € 56,426.50 € 28,213.25 AIRBUS DE Germany € 15,650.00 € 81,450.00 € 43,578.00 € 21,789.00 AIRBUS UK UK € 7,350.00 € 24,700.00 € 13,500.00 € 6,750.00 AIRBUS SPAIN Spain € 2,900.00 € 47,305.00 € 34,644.50 € 17,322.25 AGUSTA Spa Italy € 22,185.00 € 102,350.00 € 124,400.00 € 62,200.00 ALENIA AERONAUTICA Italy € 47,000.00 € 310,036.25 € 595,500.00 € 297,750.00 Westland Helicopter Ltd UK € 50,000.00 € 127,655.00 € 177,000.00 € 88,500.00 EADS CASA Spain € 5,500.00 € 59,998.75 € 91,676.00 € 45,838.00 EUROCOPTER SAS FR France € 58,950.00 € 229,202.50 € 228,225.00 € 114,112.50 EUROCOPTER DE Germany € 14,700.00 € 58,500.00 € 87,500.00 € 43,750.00 LIEBHERR Aerospace Toulouse France € 22,782.50 € 108,076.25 € 270,212.75 € 135,106.38 SAFRAN France € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 € 0.00 AIRCELLE ACL France € 10,000.00 € 78,000.00 € 134,000.00 € 67,000.00 HISPANO SUIZA France € 17,208.75 € 67,791.25 € 90,000.00 € 45,000.00 MICROTURBO France € 0.00 € 170,000.00 € 34,020.00 € 17,010.00 SNECMA France € 32,208.75 € 173,000.00 € 132,217.50 € 66,108.75
    [Show full text]
  • Two Recent Developments in Italy Illustrate How Boeing Is Working
    n FEATURE STORY Two recent developments in Italy illustrate how Boeing is working with top technology providers around the world—and helping strengthen a nation’s aerospace industry in support of Boeing’s cross-enterprise efforts OTO.COM H ISTOCKP Magnifico! 38 December 2007/January 2008 BOEING FRONTIERS n FEATURE STORY BY MAUREEN JENKINS Inside or Boeing, doing business in Italy is about more than Advanced research activities: Boeing and Alenia Aeronautica merely selling commercial airplanes or military aircraft. It’s recently signed a memorandum of understanding that calls for the Falso about leveraging the country’s high-tech and aerospace companies to jointly develop research activities in advanced materials infrastructure—and that includes its scientists and engineers— and integrated fuselage aircraft structures. Page 39 so that Italian companies can better compete in the global market- Educational collaboration: Through its connections and support, place. And with Italian corporations of all sizes partnering on key Boeing is helping strengthen the high-tech skill base of southern Italy Boeing programs, it’s critical that they be involved in the creation by facilitating a partnership between a university in the United States and development of advanced technologies. and one in Italy. Page 40 The next step in the frequent collaboration between Alenia Aeronautica and Boeing is a newly signed memorandum of un- derstanding, one where they’ll jointly develop research activities in advanced materials and integrated fuselage aircraft structures. The agreement also provides for the opening of a small Boeing Italian Research Office in the southern region of Campania, an area where government officials are keen on strengthening the high-tech skill base and creating jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Mp-Msg-045-05
    Modeling & Simulation for Experimentation, Test & Evaluation and Training: Alenia Aeronautica Experiences and Perspectives Mrs. Marcella Guido Alenia Aeronautica Simulation & System’s Operability C.so Marche 41, 10146 Torino Italy [email protected] Mr. Cristiano Montrucchio Alenia Aeronautica Simulation & System’s Operability Manager C.so Marche, 41, 10146 Torino Italy [email protected] ABSTRACT The use of Modeling & Simulation to support aircraft development is nowadays common practice within any modern aeronautical industry, and a long term key capability of Alenia Aeronautica. Starting from such crucial role, M&S utilization has progressively expanded to effectively support the aeronautical system’s early stages – feasibility and definition, and later stages – in service support and pilots training, becoming an essential element during the entire system’s life cycle. The main tool to implement and sustain such capability is the Synthetic Environment, which relies on the following elements: • Flight Simulators with engineering and training potential • Simulators networking at both LAN and WAN (Local and Wide Area Network) levels • Tactical scenarios • Image generation • Virtual reality The paper will focus on the latest major experiences of Alenia Aeronautica with the AMX ACOL, Eurofighter, C-27J and Sky-X UAV Programs, from systems concept, through development and experimentation, to pilots training and mission rehearsal. Moreover, Alenia Aeronautica’s approach and perspectives in the field of the simulation of Network Centric Operations will be described: the Network Centric Simulation Environment 1.0 INTRODUCTION The use of Modeling & Simulation (M&S) in aerospace engineering is nowadays common practice within any modern aeronautical firm and a long term key capability of Alenia Aeronautica.
    [Show full text]
  • ATR Appoints New Head of Quality
    Toulouse, 6th May 2015 ATR appoints new Head of Quality World’s leading turboprop manufacturer ATR is pleased to announce Roberto Del Pezzo as new Head of Quality. ATR has created this new direction in the aim of further developing and strengthening all activities related to quality, a core part of its business. Mr. Del Pezzo will be in charge of implementing the Quality policy with respect to the ATR objectives. Among his new responsibilities, he will be in charge of providing quality methodological support across the different directions of ATR, managing customer’s satisfaction measurement, interfacing with the certification agencies and managing the entire quality process associated to the ATR program. He will directly report to ATR’s Chief Executive Officer, Patrick de Castelbajac. Mr. Del Pezzo started its aeronautical career at Aeritalia (today Alenia Aermacchi) in 1983, holding various positions with the Product Support Directorate. In 1994 he joined the Quality Directorate of Alenia Aeronautica (today Alenia Aermacchi) as Quality Control manager first, and then he took this same position specifically for the ATR aircraft. In 1997 he was appointed as Head of the production plant of Alenia at Nola (Italy), and two years later he became Head of American programs at the plant of Pomigliano (Italy), including the manufacturing activities of Alenia for the Boeing 717s, 767s, and 777s. He moved back to the Quality Directorate in 2004, holding different positions including Senior Vice-President (SVP) Quality, SVP Quality assurance & Certification Deputy and Head of Program & Product Quality. He holds a full-honors Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Federico II University, in Naples.
    [Show full text]
  • J-20 Stealth Fighter: China's First Strike Weapon
    Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee Joint Strike Fighter Inquiry Department of the Senate PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Dear Chairman and Committee Members The Planned Acquisition of the F-35A Joint Strike Fighter Please find following my submission to this Inquiry. Yours faithfully, David Archibald Submission to the Joint Strike Fighter Inquiry Table of Contents Page 1. Executive Summary 2 2. Australia’s Future Air Defence Needs 3 3. Costs and Benefits of the F-35 Program 6 4. Changes in the Acquisition Timeline 7 5. The Performance of the F-35 in Testing 13 5.1 Introduction to the deficiencies of the F-35 13 5.2 Basing 18 5.3 Fuel Temperature 21 5.4 Engine 23 5.5 Acquisition Cost 24 5.6 Operating Cost 26 5.7 Directed Energy Weapon 28 5.8 DAS-EOTS 28 5.9 Manoeuvrability 29 5.10 Maintenance 31 5.11 Software 33 5.12 Pilot Training 33 5.13 Helmet Failure 34 5.14 Block Buy Contract 35 5.15 Stealth 35 5.16 Autonomic Logistics Information System 36 6. Potential Alternatives to the F-35 38 6.1 The Evolution of Fighter Aircraft 38 6.2 Fighter design considerations 39 6.3 How To Win In Air-To-Air Combat 45 6.4 Graphical Representation of Aircraft Attributes 46 6.5 Discussion of Alternatives to the F-35 56 6.6 F-18 Super Hornet 58 6.7 Gripen E 58 7. Any Other Related Matters 62 7.1 Basing and Logistics 62 7.2 Maintenance 62 7.3 Interim Aircraft 62 7.4 Aging of the F/A-18 A/B Hornet Aircraft 62 7.5 The US – Australia Alliance 64 8.
    [Show full text]