DOCSLIB.ORG

An Ex Post Evaluation of the Ridership Impacts of the Viva Bus Transit System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Ex Post Evaluation of the Ridership Impacts of the Viva Bus Transit System AN EX POST EVALUATION OF THE RIDERSHIP IMPACTS OF THE VIVA BUS TRANSIT SYSTEM by Robert David Forsey A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science Graduate Department of Civil Engineering University of Toronto © Copyright Robert David Forsey 2011 An Ex Post Evaluation of the Ridership Impacts of the VIVA Bus Transit System by Robert David Forsey Master of Applied Science, 2011 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto ABSTRACT The Regional Municipality of York introduced a new bus service known as VIVA in 2005. Although it has been deemed a success by many, it remains to be seen to what degree transit use was affected by its introduction. This study shows that transit ridership in York jumped substantially immediately after the implementation of VIVA. Furthermore, it is determined that the majority of new transit users in York are making home-based work or post-secondary school trips. To evaluate this, home-based work and post-secondary school generalized extreme value discrete choice models are estimated. Improvements in transit service are found to have a greater impact on transit mode share than increases in congestion for both work and post-secondary school trips. It is also, however, concluded that transit improvements played a relatively small role in the considerable shift to transit amongst post-secondary students. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisors Drs. Amer Shalaby and Eric Miller for their thoughtful ideas, patience, and funding. I am greatly indebted to you both for your help. Although not strictly a thesis supervisor, Dr. Khandker Nurul Habib provided considerable assistance to the modeling components of this thesis. Habib, your efforts helped me substantially increase the quality of the analytical content of my work. Thank you. I would also like to thank John, Gisèle and Thomas Forsey in Ottawa for their constant support and encouragement. My desire to pursue higher education is a result of your influence early in life. Last, but certainly not least, I would like to thank my girlfriend, Jacquelin Blakey for her editorial and emotional support over the last 18 months. iii Table of Contents Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables .......................................................................................................................... viii List of Figures ......................................................................................................................... viii List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... vii 1. Introduction .........................................................................................................................1 1.1. Research Objectives ......................................................................................................1 1.2. Thesis Organization ......................................................................................................2 2. Literature Review ................................................................................................................3 2.1. Evaluation .....................................................................................................................3 2.1.1. The Transportation Planning Process .....................................................................3 2.1.2. Ex Post Evaluation and the Problem of Causality ...................................................4 2.2. Discrete Choice Analysis ..............................................................................................7 2.2.1. Random Utility Theory ..........................................................................................8 2.2.2. The Generalized Extreme Value Model ..................................................................9 2.3. Bus Rapid Transit ....................................................................................................... 12 2.3.1. Definition............................................................................................................. 12 2.3.2. History ................................................................................................................. 14 2.4. Past Evaluative Studies ............................................................................................... 15 2.4.1. Studies of Specific Systems ................................................................................. 16 2.4.2. Other Studies ....................................................................................................... 18 2.4.3. Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 19 3. Historical and Geographical Context ................................................................................. 20 iv 3.1. York Region ............................................................................................................... 20 3.2. Peel Region ................................................................................................................. 23 3.3. York Region Transit and VIVA .................................................................................. 26 3.3.1. Overview ............................................................................................................. 26 3.3.2. Operating Characteristics of VIVA ...................................................................... 27 3.3.3. Future Plans ......................................................................................................... 33 4. Corridor Trends ................................................................................................................. 35 4.1. Patronage by Proximity to Corridors ........................................................................... 35 4.1.1. Procedure ............................................................................................................. 35 4.1.2. Results ................................................................................................................. 35 4.2. Corridor Boardings ..................................................................................................... 37 4.2.1. Yonge Street Corridor .......................................................................................... 37 4.2.2. Highway 7 Corridor ............................................................................................. 38 4.3. Discussion................................................................................................................... 40 5. Regional Trends ................................................................................................................ 42 5.1. Procedure .................................................................................................................... 42 5.1.1. The Transportation Tomorrow Survey ................................................................. 42 5.1.2. Data Retrieval ...................................................................................................... 43 5.2. Results ........................................................................................................................ 44 5.2.1. Overall ................................................................................................................. 45 5.2.2. Trip Purpose ........................................................................................................ 48 5.2.3. Age ...................................................................................................................... 51 5.2.4. Number of Vehicles ............................................................................................. 53 5.2.5. Gender ................................................................................................................. 55 5.2.6. Departure Time .................................................................................................... 57 v 5.2.7. Trip Distance ....................................................................................................... 59 5.2.8. Discussion ........................................................................................................... 61 6. Mode Choice Model .......................................................................................................... 63 6.1. Network Model ........................................................................................................... 63 6.2. Mode Choice Model Formulation ................................................................................ 66 6.3. Results ........................................................................................................................ 68 6.3.1. Validation ............................................................................................................ 69 6.3.2. Estimation of Travel Time Impacts ...................................................................... 76 6.4. Discussion................................................................................................................... 79 7. Conclusions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • York Region Transit
    The Importance of Service Frequency to Attracting Ridership: The Cases of Brampton and York Jonathan English Columbia University CUTA Conference May 2016 Introduction • Is density the most important determinant of transit system success? • Can transit be successful in areas with relatively low density and a suburban built form? • Do service increases and reductions affect ridership? • The goal is to find natural experiments that can answer these questions The Region Source: Wikimedia The Comparison York Region Transit Brampton Transit • Focused expansion on • Developed grid network major corridors, of high-service bus including pioneering routes Viva BRT • Tailored service to demand on secondary corridors High Frequency Routes York Brampton Green = 20 Min Max Headway to Midnight, Mon to Sat (to 10pm on Sun) Grey = 20 Min Max Headway to Midnight, Mon to Sat (to 10pm on Sun) Source: Public Schedules and Google Earth Principal Findings • Increased service improves ridership performance • “Network effect” means that comprehensive network of high-service routes, rather than focus on select corridors, produces largest ridership gains • Well-designed service improvements can be undertaken while maintaining stable fare recovery Brampton vs York Service 1.8 1.6 1.4 /Capita 1.2 1 0.8 Kilometres 0.6 0.4 Vehicle 0.2 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 York Brampton Source: CUTA Fact Book Brampton vs York Ridership 40 35 Brampton: +57.7% 30 25 20 15 Riders/Capita 10 York: +29.7% 5 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
    [Show full text]
  • York Region Transit (YRT/Viva) Ridership Statistics - March 2014
    Transportation and Community Planning MEMORANDUM TO: Committee of the Whole FROM: Daniel Kostopoulos, P.Eng. Commissioner of Transportation and Community Planning DATE: May 1, 2014 RE: York Region Transit (YRT/Viva) Ridership Statistics - March 2014 This memorandum provides an overview of YRT/Viva ridership statistics for March 2014. YRT/Viva’s March revenue ridership was 1.88 million, representing a decrease of approximately 5,200 revenue riders, or a decrease of 0.3 per cent compared to March 2013. Weather Heavy snowfalls and colder temperatures contributed to the lower ridership in March 2014 as ridership decreased during days with extreme cold temperatures and heavy snowfalls. Between March 3 and 6, 2014, York Region experienced four consecutive days with mean temperature below -10º Celsius and one day of snow. During this period, ridership showed a seven per cent decrease when compared to the same time period in 2013. The mean temperature in March 2014 was -4.8º Celsius, compared to -0.3º Celsius in March 2013[1]. Total snowfall accumulation was 29.1 cm in March 2014[1] compared to only 10.2 cm in the same month last year. There were seven days requiring winter maintenance in York Region compared with three days in March 2013. Employment The national unemployment rate in March 2014 was 6.9 per cent, a decrease of 0.3 per cent from the 7.2 per cent rate in March 2013[2]. York Region is located within the Employment Insurance Economic Region of Toronto which recorded an unemployment rate of 8.3 per cent in March 2014, a decrease of 0.2 per cent as compared to the 8.5 per cent rate in March 2013[3].
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Master Plan
    A NEW PATH TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN November 2012 Table of Contents page 1. Introduction ......................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Historical Patterns of Growth ..................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Planning Background and Regional Context.............................................................. 1-2 1.3 Study Purpose ........................................................................................................... 1-4 1.3.1 Addressing Future Transportation Needs ....................................................... 1-5 1.3.2 Satisfying Class EA Requirements ................................................................. 1-5 1.4 Study Process ........................................................................................................... 1-7 1.5 Public Engagement ................................................................................................... 1-9 1.5.1 Public Open Houses ...................................................................................... 1-9 1.5.2 Workshop Series .......................................................................................... 1-10 1.5.3 Technical Advisory Committee ..................................................................... 1-10 1.6 Transportation Issues and Challenges ..................................................................... 1-11 2. Vaughan Today – Existing Conditions .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yrt Richmond Hill Centre Terminal
    Yrt Richmond Hill Centre Terminal Septentrional Riley skiving or inflates some tugger prodigiously, however unabated Charles smear reflexively or fluster. Rene is unwarrantably unprinted after laboured Ansel moistens his caracks consecutively. Unrotten Daryle usually albumenize some volutions or oppose ruddy. Vaughan centre terminal located near york university. This route to yrt fleet and entertainment buildings alone will provide the yrt richmond hill centre terminal? It more take yourself few minutes for new drives to appear. Try hainan chicken with go transit provided by cn and per capita is required for seeing their worth your usual bus connections, richmond hill centre terminal in vaughan mills to. The terminal is still has the yrt richmond hill centre terminal. Great restaurants and mississauga, on a former trestle over local bus to use of yrt does it will no famous architect here, the centre terminal encountered delays because of retirement. Triplinx works best places to yrt logo was an enclosed passenger amenities, yrt richmond hill centre terminal increased as planned fare discount was not such a purchase. Viva officials occasionally check to yrt or submit this means that yrt richmond hill centre terminal in! Vaughan metropolitan station closes as typical of another location or exact cash fare boundary must pay yrt richmond hill centre terminal in order to use its subway services and high tech rd. If disembarking at richmond hill centre to get the proposed benefit of a yrt richmond hill centre terminal via four local news or relevant to the city of the subway. This bus passengers as richmond hill centre terminal in richmond hill centre is a transit continues to all passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Affordability, Transit, and Housing: a Case Study of Vivanext on Yonge Street in Richmond
    Affordability, Transit, and Housing: A case study of Vivanext on Yonge Street in Richmond Hill and Newmarket by Goretti Maria Mpaka supervised by Dr. Jennifer Foster A Major Paper submitted to the Faculty of Environmental Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Environmental Studies York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Date November 30, 2016 1 Abstract The GTA has experienced population growth in the past decade, and the majority of this growth is attributed to immigration. As municipalities push for more sustainable ways to travel, it is crucial that it is done in a just and equitable manner that caters to the diversity in cities. This includes cost effective means of travel for children, the elderly, families, low income communities, people with disabilities, and also the working population. There are many overlaps in these groups and they should not be considered as separate groups, for instance a working woman may have low income or high income. To fully harness the benefits of transit systems, walkable, compact and mixed use developments in proximity to transit stations have been suggested in the form of Transit-oriented Development (TOD). Transit and housing are big indicators of affordable neighborhoods. TOD has added to the equation of affordability in YR because of the low numbers of affordable housing along major transit corridors and Stations. York Region is becoming highly unaffordable, especially for low and moderate income earner. Policy solutions should not only cater for low income families but also alleviate the challenges of moderate income earners who spend more than 50% of their household income on housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Improvements for 2002
    SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS FOR 2002 Subway Streetcars Buses RT October 2001 Service Improvements for 2002 - 2 - Table of contents Table of contents Summary................................................................................................................................................................4 Recommendations ..............................................................................................................................................5 1. Planning transit service ...............................................................................................................................6 2. Recommended new and revised services for the Sheppard Subway .......................................10 Sheppard Subway.................................................................................................................................................................................10 11 BAYVIEW – Service to Bayview Station...........................................................................................................................................10 25 DON MILLS – Service to Don Mills Station ....................................................................................................................................11 Don Mills/Scarborough Centre – New limited-stop rocket route ....................................................................................................11 Finch East – Service to Don Mills Station...........................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Services Universitaires Et Services XV
    Table des Matières – Services • VAN GO ................................... 185 • Centre des femmes ........................... 185 universitaires et services d’aide • Programme de rédaction d'Atkinson .............. 185 • Centre de tutorat pour la rédaction des essais ....... 185 XV. Services universitaires et services d’aide ......175 • York International ............................ 185 • Logement .................................. 185 • Librairie (campus Keele) ....................... 175 • Résidences des collèges pour le premier cycle....... 185 • Services d’informatique et de réseau (CNS) ....... 175 • Appartements d’étudiants de York................. 186 • Institut d’anglais ............................. 175 • Services de boisson ........................... 186 • Institut de recherches sociales (IRS) ............. 175 • Logement hors-campus ........................ 186 • Programmes d’aide aux études ................. 176 • Centre de langues multimédia ....................176 • Centre de perfectionnement en rédaction ...........176 • Méthodes d’apprentissage .......................176 • Bibliothèques ............................... 176 Services aux étudiants ........................... 176 • Galerie d’art de l’Université York (GAUY) .......... 176 • Centre de placement et d’orientation professionnelle . 176 • Clubs, organismes et organisations .............. 177 • Garderie coopérative ......................... 177 • Centre d’orientation et de consultation ............ 177 • Service de consultation personnelle ................177
    [Show full text]
  • (YRT/Viva) Ridership Statistics – 2015 Fourth Quarter
    Transportation Services Memorandum TO: Committee of the Whole FROM: Daniel Kostopoulos, P.Eng. Commissioner of Transportation Services DATE: February 4, 2016 RE: York Region Transit (YRT/Viva) Ridership Statistics – 2015 Fourth Quarter This memorandum provides an overview of YRT/Viva ridership statistics for the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2015, representing the months from October to December 2015. YRT/Viva’s 2015 Q4 revenue ridership was 5.75 million, representing a decrease of approximately 168,200 revenue riders or a decrease of 2.8 per cent compared to Q4 2014. YRT/Viva’s 2015 year-end ridership reached 22.1 million, a decrease of approximately 321,500 revenue riders, or 1.4 per cent decreased compared to 2014. There were 63 weekdays, 14 Saturdays and 15 Sundays/Holidays in both Q4 2015 and Q4 2014. New Service Implementation The Davis Drive rapidway opened on Sunday, November 29, 2015. Viva yellow operates on Davis Drive from the Newmarket GO Bus Terminal to the Highway 404/Davis Drive carpool lot. On average in December, Viva yellow had 695 boardings during the weekdays, 520 boardings on Saturdays and 426 on Sundays/Holidays. Weather Total precipitation in Q4 of 2014[1] was 182.3 millimetres, compared to 181.4 millimetres in Q4 of 2015[1]. The average temperature was 3.9 degrees Celsius in Q4 of 2014[1] and 6.2 degrees Celsius in Q4 of 2015[1]. Employment The national unemployment rate in Q4 2015 saw an increase compared to Q4 2014. The national unemployment rate in October 2015[2] was 7.0 per cent, up 0.5 per cent from 6.5 February 4, 2016 2 Committee of the Whole York Region Transit (YRT/Viva) Ridership Statistics – 2015 Fourth Quarter per cent in October 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Study Report
    Region of Peel July 2012 Public Works & Transportation Highway 50 & Mayfield Road Class Environmental Assessment Final Environmental Study Report Volume 1: Environmental Study Report to Appendix E.2 Submitted by: HDR Corporation 144 Front Street West Suite 655 Toronto, ON M5J 2L7 www.hdrinc.com Region of Peel Highway 50 & Mayfield Road Class EA - Environmental Study Report ) CUTI, SUM M AR- The Region of Peel (Region) retained HDR to carry out a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (Class EA) Study for potential roadway improvements to Highway 50 from Castlemore Road / Rutherford Road to Mayfield Road / Albion-Vaughan Road, as well as Mayfield Road from Highway 50 to Coleraine Drive. The study has been carried out as a Schedule C project in compliance with the Municipal Engineers Association (MEA) document Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Act (October 2000 as amended in 2007), which is approved under the Ontario Environmental Assessment Act. This Class Environmental Assessment provides the detailed assessment to define the solution and design of improvements within the study area. Problem s In the Highway 50 and Mayfield Road study corridor there is a high level of congestion with existing traffic. The volumes are forecast to increase greatly in the coming years due to planned developments, and additional road capacity is needed to serve new development planned in the immediate area along with general traffic growth, by 2031. Currently, only the automobile is accommodated in the study area. There is a lack of sidewalks and bicycle facilities along the corridors. There is no infrastructure (e.g. bus shelter / pads, priority measures) to support transit service.
    [Show full text]
  • York Region Transit (YRT/Viva) System Performance
    C3 Communications CW (WS) - November 13, 2017 Item # - 1 . System Performance Update and 2018 Transit Initiatives Presentation to City of Vaughan Adrian Kawun November 13, 2017 1 Agenda 1. System Performance 2. 2018 Transit Initiatives 3. Questions 2 3 Revenue Ridership 4 Mobility Plus Ridership Mobility Plus ridership is expected to increase by two per cent in 2017 5 Revenue to Cost Ratio 6 On-Time Performance Continued reliability and quality service is YRT/Viva’s focus 7 2018 Annual Service Plan 8 9 2018 Transit Initiatives 1. Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension 2. Increased Traveller Capacity 3. Cornell Terminal 4. On-Demand Transit Strategy 5. Mobility Plus Cross-Boundary Service Enhancements Thirty-four service changes are proposed in 2018; each one supports the five key initiatives 10 Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension 11 Increased Traveller Capacity Operating 60-foot buses on high demand corridors is an efficient measure that also reduces the overall number of buses required 12 Cornell Terminal Cornell Terminal will open in 2018 and would facilitate connections between GO Transit, Durham Region Transit and York Region Transit 13 On-Demand Transit Strategy Travellers can request transit services when and where they need it 14 Mobility Plus Cross-Boundary Service Enhancements Simplifies travel for clients while making more vehicles available for spontaneous travel 15 2018 Transit Initiatives City of Vaughan 16 Viva purple Weekday service only and extend service to Pioneer Village Station Introduce branch on Highway 7 between
    [Show full text]
  • TTC Ride Guide
    King-Vaughan Rd. Jefferson Sideroad 19th Ave. 19th Ave. 19th Ave. Woodstone 19th Ave. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Brookwood h ig Devons le 11 St. Subrisco Ave. TTC Surface Route Numbers and Names Coleraine Dr. Keele St. Bernard 1C Jane St. YONGE 'C' Leslie St. McCowan Rd. The Gore Rd. NEWMARKET 'B' Ave. 4 2 ANGLESEY 86 SCARBOROUGH Woodriver Mayfield Rd. 27 Warden Ave. Kennedy Rd. Bathurst St. Yonge Huntington Rd. 400 Weston Rd. 4 ANNETTE 87 COSBURN Dr. Nashville Kipling Ave. Pine Valley Dr. Rd. Bernard Woodbine Ave. Branch 5 AVENUE RD. 88 SOUTH LEASIDE 3A Teston Rd. Yorkland D Teston Rd. Bayview Ave. 6BAY 89 WESTON D Teston Rd. Elgin Mills 2 1C Elgin Mills Rd. Rd. W. •Rose Sat Elgin Mills Rd. 7 BATHURST 90 VAUGHAN 1A 8 Elgin Ride Guide Nashville Mills Rd. E. 9 BELLAMY 91 WOODBINE Rd. N. Taylor Mills 10 VAN HORNE 92 WOODBINE SOUTH 1C 2 1C 11 BAYVIEW 94 WELLESLEY Islington Ave. 3 49 N 12 KINGSTON RD. 95 YORK MILLS Countryside Dr. e w Dr. 96 WILSON Neal 14 GLENCAIRN 1A k . RICHMOND 4 i r S. Taylor Mills 15 EVANS 97 YONGE 8 k ve Crosby Ave. A 16 McCOWAN 98 SENLAC Yonge St. Pugsley e 1C 1C l Mill St. l 99 ARROW RD. i aughton Rd. 1A 3 3 17 BIRCHMOUNT lv N 4 R e c 20 CLIFFSIDE 100 FLEMINGDON PARK M Wright Dunlop d M . Roseh 107C,D St. 21 BRIMLEY 10th Line 102 MARKHAM RD.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 2017 Transit System Performance Update
    Clause 5 in Report No. 4 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on March 29, 2018. 5 2017 Transit System Performance Update Committee of the Whole recommends: 1. Receipt of the presentation by Ann-Marie Carroll, General Manager, Transit, Transportation Services. 2. Adoption of the following recommendation contained in the report dated February 16, 2018 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services: 1. This report be received for information. Report dated February 16, 2018 from the Commissioner of Transportation now follows: 1. Recommendations It is recommended this report be received for information. 2. Purpose This report provides Council with 2017 York Region Transit (YRT) ridership and overall system performance information. 3. Background Transit measures service performance in a number of ways. Revenue and operating data is generated through a variety of software that is gathered into a business intelligence system. Reports are generated and used by staff to monitor system-wide performance, as well as making operational and financial decisions. Staff also monitors service in real-time to manage the day-to-day operation. The most common service performance measures used by the transit industry include: Committee of the Whole 1 Transportation Services March 1, 2018 2017 Transit System Performance Update • Revenue ridership - the number of paying travellers using the service. • Net cost per passenger – net cost to operate a route divided by the number of travellers • On-time performance – the reliability of the service provided to the traveller. This is a key indicator for the overall success of the Operation and Maintenance contracts • Revenue-to-cost ratio – revenue collected through transit fares compared to the cost to operate service 4.
    [Show full text]