8 Cultural Heritage Final FINAL

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

8 Cultural Heritage Final FINAL Bake Farm Environmental Statement Chapter 8 CULTURAL HERITAGE INTRODUCTION 8.1. This chapter provides an assessment of the potential archaeological and heritage implications of a proposed solar energy farm at Bake Farm, Coombe Bissett, Wiltshire (Site centre SU 113 277; Fig. 8.1). It has been prepared by Archaedia. Site context 8.2. Chapter two and three of this ES provide a detailed description of the application site and the proposed development. In summary, the application site is within four agricultural fields to the north east of the village of Coombe Bissett (The Site; Fig. 8.1) and extends over an area of 40.2 hectares. The proposed development comprises a solar farm, access track, cable trench and related development. 8.3. This chapter aims to establish the presence or absence, character and extent, date, integrity, state of preservation and relative value of the known or potential heritage assets within the Site. In order to understand the context of the Site, it aims to establish the history and land-use development of the area and its environs, thereby allowing an assessment and quantification of the relevant impact of the proposed development on this resource. In addition it considers the impact on the settings of designated assets in the wider area. Finally, the effects of the proposed development and the need for and scope of any mitigation required to address such effects are set out. Planning context 8.4. Chapter five of this Environmental Statement (ES) sets out the full planning policy context at the national and local levels. The paragraphs below identify guidance and planning policy relevant to archaeology and cultural heritage. National planning policy and guidance 8.5. Chapter 12 of the NPPF1 deals with 'Conserving and enhancing the historic environment' and states that “heritage assets are an irreplaceable resource” (Paragraph 126). Paragraphs 128 and 129, which deal with determining planning applications, state the need to identify and assess the significance of heritage assets and their settings, and take this into account when considering the impact of the proposed development. In the case of designated assets, and non-designated assets of demonstrably equivalent significance, great weight should be given to the asset's conservation (Paragraphs 132–134 and 139). 8.6. Paragraph 141 notes that: “Local planning authorities should … require developers to record and advance understanding of the significance of any heritage assets to be lost (wholly or in part) in a manner proportionate to their Department for Communities and Local Government (March 2012). 1 Chapter 8: Cultural Heritage July 2014 8 - 1 Bake Farm Environmental Statement importance and the impact, and to make this evidence (and any archive generated) publicly accessible. However, the ability to record evidence of our past should not be a factor in deciding whether such loss should be permitted.” 8.7. Hedgerows of historic importance are afforded protection under The Hedgerow Regulations 1997, section 97 of the Environment Act 1995.2 Any hedgerow which is defined, at that date, as being of historical or ecological importance requires a grant of consent by the local planning authority prior to removal. Development plan policy 8.8. The application site is located in the administrative area of Wiltshire Council, a unitary authority created in 2009 incorporating Salisbury District Council. For the purposes of section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, the statutory development plan currently comprises: • The South Wiltshire Core Strategy (adopted February 2012); • Policies ‘saved’ from the Salisbury District Local Plan 2003. 8.9. The South Wiltshire Core Strategy (SWCS) was adopted in February 2012. It primarily deals with housing and employment development for which there are specific targets divided across a hierarchy of towns and villages, with visions for individual ‘Community Areas’. 8.10. The 2003 Salisbury District Local Plan (SDLP) remains part of the statutory Development Plan by virtue of some policies having been ‘saved’ by ministerial Direction. Whilst parts of it have since been superseded by the South Wiltshire Core Strategy, the SDLP continues to play a role in determining planning applications, particularly in relation to detailed technical issues. Archaeology and ancient monuments is addressed in sections 6.31 to 6.36 and set out in policies CN21-23. Inherent mitigation 8.11. The proposed solar farm contains inherent mitigation, i.e. mitigation that is ‘designed in’ and forms a key component of the proposed site layout. The main form of this inherent mitigation is the set back of the solar array modules from the boundary hedgerows by a distance of 8.4 metres. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY Sources 8.12. This assessment has been undertaken with reference to relevant national and local legislation and policy and guidance listed above, and also to good practice guidance provided in The Institute for Archaeologists Standards and Guidance: desk-based assessment.3 2 Hedgerow regulations act, 1997. 3 Institute for Archaeologists 2012, 7. Chapter 8: Cultural Heritage July 2014 8 - 2 Bake Farm Environmental Statement 8.13. The following sources were consulted in compiling the baseline information: Wiltshire and Swindon Historic Environment Record (HER), Wiltshire and Swindon Archives (Record Office), Wiltshire Studies Library, English Heritage (EH) National Heritage List for England, English Heritage Archives and Archaedia archives. Study area 8.14. HER records were examined for a study area of 1km from the main application site boundary. All heritage assets within 0.5km of the Site are described in section 8.53 and shown on Fig. 8.2 (note: all figures are presented at the end of this chapter, following the appendices). Selected heritage assets between 0.5km and 1km of the Site are also indicated on Fig. 8.2. 8.15. English Heritage records for statutorily designated sites, including Scheduled Monuments, Listed Buildings, Registered Parks and Gardens and Registered Battlefields, were examined for an area up to 5km from the Site. Selected sites are described in sections 8.27–8.31 and are located on Fig. 8.1. 8.16. This assessment also considers the potential impact on the settings of higher level designated heritage assets (Scheduled Monuments, Grade I and II* Listed Buildings, Grade I and II* Registered Parks and Gardens and Registered Battlefields). Selected sites are described in sections 8.32–8.34 and are located on Fig. 8.1. Surveys 8.17. A field visit was undertaken on 28.8.12 and 23.4.14 by Tim Gent, BA, MPhil, MIFA (sections 8.47-52 below). This comprised a walkover survey of all areas within the application area and visits to designated heritage assets (where possible) to assess potential impacts on settings. 8.18. A geophysical survey of the two westernmost fields of the assessment Site has been undertaken by Stratascan Ltd.4 Additional potential heritage assets identified by the survey are assessed in this chapter. These are identified as assets 8 a-d within the text and tables below, and on Fig. 8.2 at the end of this chapter. Full details of the survey are presented as a separate report (Appendix 8.1). Assessing impact significance Valuation of the heritage asset 8.19. According to the English Heritage Historic Environment Planning Practice Guide the term ‘heritage asset’ “embraces all manner of features, including: buildings, parks and gardens, standing, buried and submerged remains, areas, sites and landscapes, whether designated or not and whether or not capable of designation” (section 3.10, Ref 17.2.). 8.20. The definition of the value of the identified heritage assets is defined as follows: • unknown – insufficient information is available to allow a reliable assessment to be made; 4 Stratascan Ltd, 2012. Chapter 8: Cultural Heritage July 2014 8 - 3 Bake Farm Environmental Statement • low – significant at a local level; • medium – significant at a local or regional level; • high – significant at a national level; or • very high – significant at an international level. 8.21. The definition of the value of known but undesignated heritage assets within the Site, or assets identified during the course of the assessment is determined by professional judgement, supported where required by appropriate consultation. Impact magnitude 8.22. The magnitude of any impact on a heritage asset (receptor) is based on the following values: • None – No change to the asset; • Negligible – Negligible change to the asset; • Small – A minor change to the asset; • Medium – A fundamental change to the asset; or • Large – Major destruction of an asset. Impact significance 8.23. The definition of the significance of the impact on the heritage assets will be defined as follows (with criteria indicated in table 8.1 below): • No impact – Where no impact is identified; • Negligible – Where the effects are negligible; • Minor – Where the impact relates to heritage assets of low value, or the effect is on heritage assets of medium value, but the impact is limited; • Moderate – Where the effects relate to heritage assets of low to medium value, or the effect is on heritage assets of high value, but the impact is more limited; • Major – Where the effects are significant and relate to heritage assets of medium to high value, or the effect is on heritage assets of high value, but the impact is more limited; or • Severe – Where the effects are significant and relate to heritage assets of high or very high value. All impacts on assets of very high value are severe. Table 8.1 – Impact significance matrix MAGNIT- NONE NEGLIGIBLE SMALL MEDIUM LARGE UDE VALUE / SENSITIVITY VERY HIGH NO IMPACT SEVERE SEVERE SEVERE SEVERE HIGH NO IMPACT MINOR MODERATE MAJOR SEVERE MEDIUM NO IMPACT MINOR MINOR MODERATE MAJOR LOW NO IMPACT NEGLIGIBLE MINOR MINOR MODERATE UNKNOWN NO IMPACT UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN UNKNOWN . Chapter 8: Cultural Heritage July 2014 8 - 4 Bake Farm Environmental Statement 8.24.
Recommended publications
  • Neighbourhood Plan: Submission Draft Pimperne Neighbourhood Plan
    Pimperne Neighbourhood Plan: Submission draft Pimperne Neighbourhood Plan Prepared by: Pimperne Neighbourhood Plan Group, on behalf of Pimperne Parish Council, North Dorset Version: Submission draft Plan period: 2016 to 2031 Date of publication: April 2018 April 2018 Pimperne Neighbourhood Plan: Submission draft Contents Summary: why this Neighbourhood Plan is important ............................................................ 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2 Why do we need a Neighbourhood Plan? ........................................................................... 2 What difference will a Neighbourhood Plan make? .............................................................. 2 How this Plan was prepared ............................................................................................. 2 With thanks to… ............................................................................................................. 3 About the area .................................................................................................................. 4 What do we want for Pimperne’s future? .............................................................................. 5 Vision and objectives ...................................................................................................... 5 Plan period and future reviews ......................................................................................... 5 The character
    [Show full text]
  • Salisbury Central Area Framework Public Consultation
    Salisbury Central Area Framework Public Consultation Report (Jan - Feb 2020) 1 1. Introduction 1.1. Wiltshire Council has produced a Salisbury Central Area Framework (CAF) which makes a series of recommendations for future development in Salisbury’s city centre area. 1.2. The CAF project was borne out of the recovery work in the city following the nerve agent attack in March 2018, which had a profoundly damaging impact on the city centre economy. At the time of writing Salisbury, along with the rest of the world, is now in the midst of the Covid-19 crisis. While the impact of the pandemic has delayed the work on the CAF, the shutdown and economic fallout has made the need to plan proactively for the city centre even more acute. It has accelerated the urgency to deliver the recommendations of the CAF in order to support Salisbury in its long-term recovery from both tragic events. The plans and projects within the CAF form an essential part of Salisbury's bounce back from these events. 1.3. The CAF makes a series of recommendations for deliverable development initiatives within the city centre area to help aid the city’s recovery. It is intended to serve as an evidence-based document to inform the Wiltshire Local Plan Review, the emerging Salisbury Neighbourhood Plan and future planning guidance documents as appropriate. 1.4. The council has undertaken two stages of in-depth public consultation on the CAF. The first was a consultation on a series of broad themes for the CAF between Thursday 27th June and Friday 9th August 2019 and the second was on a draft CAF between Thursday 16th January and Friday 28th February 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Weymouth & Portland Borough
    Public Document Pack PLANNING COMMITTEE Members of Planning Committee are invited to attend this meeting at Commercial Road, Weymouth, Dorset to consider the items listed on the following page. Matt Prosser Chief Executive Date: Wednesday, 10 January 2018 Time: 9.00 am Venue: Council Chamber - WPBC Members of Committee: M Tewkesbury (Chairman), M Leicester (Vice-Chairman), K Brookes, H Bruce, I Bruce, J Ellis, C James, O Kanji, P Kimber, C Page-Nash, A Weaving and S West USEFUL INFORMATION For more information about this agenda please telephone Elaine Tibble, 01305 838223 email [email protected] This agenda and reports are also available on the Council’s website at www.dorsetforyou.com/committees/ Weymouth and Portland Borough Council. Mod.gov public app now available – Download the free public app now for your iPad, Android and Windows 8.1/10 tablet from your app store. Search for Mod.gov to access agendas/ minutes and select Dorset Councils Partnership. Members of the public are welcome to attend this meeting with the exception of any items listed in the exempt part of this agenda. Disabled access is available for all of the council’s committee rooms. Hearing loop facilities are available. Please speak to a Democratic Services Officer for assistance in using this facility. Recording, photographing and using social media at meetings The council is committed to being open and transparent in the way it carries out its business whenever possible. Anyone can film, audio-record, take photographs, and use social media such as tweeting and blogging to report the meeting when it is open to the public, so long as they conform to the Council’s protocol, a copy of which can be obtained from the Democratic Services Team.
    [Show full text]
  • Bath & North East Somerset Bristol
    Archaeological Investigations Project 2004 Field Evaluations South West Bath & North East Somerset Bath & North East Somerset 2 /824 (C.47.S001) ST 76556663 BA1 7HZ BAILBROOK 1, BATH Bailbrook 1, Bath, Bath and North-East Somerset. Archaeological Evaluation Evans, D Cirencester : Cotswold Archaeology, 2004, 10pp, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Cotswold Archaeology An archaeological evaluation was undertaken in advance of a proposed residential development. The evaluation identified a single ditch and associated recuts. Although undated, the ditch correlated closely with the location of a former field boundary depicted on late 19th century cartographic sources. [Au(adp)] Archaeological periods represented: UD 2 /825 (C.47.T001) ST 76656705 BA1 7AE BAILBROOK 2, BATH Bailbrook 2, Bath, Bath and North-East Somerset: Archaeological Evaluation Evans, D Cirencester : Cotswold Archaeology, 2004, 12pp, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Cotswold Archaeology 11 evaluation trenches were excavated but no archaeology was encountered. [AIP] 2 /826 (C.47.S002) ST 76556663 BA1 7HZ BAILBROOK 4 (THE ELMS), BATH Bailbrook 4 (The Elms), Bath, Bath and North-East Somerset. Archaeological Evaluation Evans, D Cirencester : Cotswold Archaeology, 2004, 11pp, figs, tabs, refs Work undertaken by: Cotswold Archaeology An archaeological evaluation was undertaken in advance of a proposed development. The evaluation identified two undated, intercutting ditches/gullies and a probable post-medieval land drain. [Au(abr)] Archaeological periods represented: UD, PM 2 /827 (C.47.S003) ST 75476544 BA2 6NX GIBBS GARAGE, BATHWICK STREET, BATH Gibbs Garage, Bathwick Street, Bath. An Archaeological Evaluation Wallis, S Reading : Thames Valley Archaeological Services, 2004, 27pp, colour pls, figs, refs Work undertaken by: Thames Valley Archaeological Services Evaluation trenches were excavated and observation of geo-technical pits was carried out on the site of a proposed residential development.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for North Dorset District Council Full
    Public Document Pack FULL COUNCIL Members of North Dorset District Council are invited to attend this meeting at Durweston Village Hall, Church Road, Durweston, Blandford Forum, Dorset, DT11 0QA, to consider the items listed on the following page. Stuart Caundle Head of Paid Service Date: Friday, 25 January 2019 Time: 10.00 am Venue: Durweston Village Hall - NDDC Members of Committee: P Batstone, B Batty-Smith MBE, D Beer, P Brown, A Burch (Vice-Chairman), G Carr- Jones, A Cattaway, A Chase, B Cooper, D Croney, C Dowden, V Fox, J Francis, M Gould, T Handford, G Jefferson, S Jespersen, A Kerby, N Lacey-Clarke, C Langham, E Parker, V Pothecary (Chairman), S Pritchard, B Ridout, M Roake, D Skipwith, J Somper, Jackie Stayt, John Stayt, J Tanner, D Walsh, J Westbrook and P Williams MBE USEFUL INFORMATION For more information about this agenda please telephone Sandra Deary 01258 484370 email [email protected] This agenda and reports are also available on the Council’s website at www.dorsetforyou.com/committees/ North Dorset District Council. Members of the public are welcome to attend this meeting with the exception of any items listed in the exempt part of this agenda. Please note that if you attend a committee meeting and make oral representations to the committee your name, together with a summary of your comments will be recorded in the minutes of the meeting. The minutes, which are the formal record of the meeting, will be available to view in electronic and paper format, as a matter of public record, for a minimum of 6 years following the date of the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Islands from the English Crown
    JOURNAL June 38 2011 Well Turned Out, Shell Turned Out! Please note that Copyright for any articles contained in this Journal rests with the Authors as shown. Please contact them directly if you wish to use their material. 1 Hello All In recent months there has been the news of the deaths of two further Great War veterans, Frank Buckles in the USA, and former Royal Navy man, Claude Choules in Australia, both having reached the grand old age of 110 years. One cannot be too sad, for both had clearly enjoyed long lives, certainly way past the ‘three score and ten’. But, another death that had also occurred recently was that of Professor Richard Holmes, the military historian, at the comparatively young age of 65, a somewhat sadder event. Probably more than any other historian in the last twenty or so years, he had helped to bring to the fore the Great War, thanks to his lectures, television programmes and books. The memsahib and I attended a talk of his at the Royal Marines’ Museum in the former RM Officers’ Mess at Eastney some fifteen years ago, and he demonstrated his outstanding ability to talk without notes for an hour or so, holding a 300+ audience in thrall throughout. In retrospect, he may not have been as prolific as others in terms of the number of books produced, for he had a day job as well, but, he was a communicator without equal, and from several obituaries in the press and related comments, it is clear that he was widely regarded.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Flooding and Storms on Western Dorset Between December 2013 and February 2014
    Flooding and Storms The Impact of Flooding and Storms on Western Dorset between December 2013 and February 2014 (Observer Newspaper taken 6th Feb 2014) 1. Met Office - National Weather Picture December 2013 to January 2014 The first storm of 5 December brought very strong winds to Scotland and northern England, and a major storm surge affecting North Sea coasts. A week of quieter weather then followed, but from mid-December there was a succession of further major winter storms that continued into early January. Initially most of the weather impacts related to the strong winds, first across the north of the UK and then affecting exposed areas further south. However, as rainfall totals accumulated the focus of concern shifted from strong winds to flooding, including large river catchments such as the Severn and Thames. Finally, in early January, strong winds, combining with high spring tides and river flows, resulted in high water levels and large waves affecting exposed coastal communities in the south and west, causing coastal flooding. January to Feb 2014 Around 6 major storms hit through this period, separated by intervals of 2 to 3 days. The sequence of storms followed an earlier stormy period from mid-December 2013 to early January 2014. Taken individually, the first two storms were notable but not exceptional for the winter period. However, the later storms from early to mid-February were much more severe. Overall, the period from mid- rep_20140603_flooding and storms_2 1 Flooding and Storms December 2013 to mid-February 2014 saw at least 12 major winter storms, and, when considered overall, this was the stormiest period of weather the UK has experienced for at least 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Portland Neighbourhood Plan
    Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Portland Neighbourhood Plan Environmental Report to accompany the submission version of the Neighbourhood Plan Portland Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group May 2019 Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Environmental Report to accompany the Portland Neighbourhood Plan submission version of the Neighbourhood Plan Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Ryan Putt Nick Chisholm-Batten Steve Smith Environmental Associate Director Technical Director Consultant Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position V2.0 09/05/19 Submission 09/05/19 Nick Chisholm- Associate version Batten Director Prepared for: Portland Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group Prepared by: AECOM Limited Plumer House Third Floor, East Wing Tailyour Road Crownhill Plymouth PL6 5DH United Kingdom T: +44 (1752) 676700 aecom.com © 2019 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for use of Locality (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Portland Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group AECOM Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Environmental Report to accompany
    [Show full text]
  • Bournemouth Dorset Poole Workspace Strategy and Delivery Plan
    South West Regional Development Agency Bournemouth Dorset Poole Workspace Strategy and Delivery Plan October 2008 GVA Grimley Ltd 10 Stratton Street London W1J 8JR 08449 02 03 04 www.gvagrimley.co.uk This report is designed to be printed double sided. South West Regional Development Agency Bournemouth Dorset Poole Workspace Strategy and Delivery Plan Final Report October 2008 Reference: 07A800547 Contact: Robert Salkeld Tel: 020 7911 2147 Email: [email protected] www.gvagrimley.co.uk South West Regional Development Agency Bournemouth Dorset Poole Workspace Strategy CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................1 A – THE WORKSPACE STRATEGY 3 2. POLICY CONTEXT........................................................................................................................7 3. COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MARKET REVIEW.........................................................................31 4. SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT...................................................................................................47 5. EMPLOYMENT LAND DEMAND PROJECTIONS ......................................................................63 6. EMPLOYMENT LAND SUPPLY..................................................................................................77 7. BALANCING DEMAND AND SUPPLY .......................................................................................85 8. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................................95
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Report
    Strategic environmental assessment for the Portland Neighbourhood Plan: Scoping Report Quality information Document name Ref Prepared for Prepared by Date Reviewed by Scoping Report for Portland Graham McGrath Nick Chisholm- the Portland DR-00832 Neighbourhood Environmental 15 August 2016 Batten Neighbourhood Plan Plan Consultant Revision history Revision Revision date Details Name Position Nick Chisholm- 2 15 August 2016 Consultation Principal Consultant Batten AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (hereafter referred to as “AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Portland Town Council in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client or relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. The information contained in this Report is based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by AECOM has not been independently verified by AECOM, unless otherwise stated in the Report. The method adopted and the sources of information used by AECOM in providing its services are outlined in this Report. The work described in this Report is based on the conditions encountered and the information available during the said period of time. The scope of this Report and the services are accordingly factually limited by these circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Oak Milborne St Andrew, Blandford Forum, Dorset, DT11 0JG
    The Royal Oak Milborne St Andrew, Blandford Forum, Dorset, DT11 0JG The Royal Oak Milborne St Andrew, Blandford Forum, Dorset, DT11 0JG WELL ESTABLISHED AND SUCCESSFUL ‘FAMILY FRIENDLY’ VILLAGE INN WITH STRONG TURNOVER Award winning pub, operating at the heart of the community and offering a welcoming atmosphere CHARACTER MAIN BAR & RESTAURANT • ‘JUG & BOTTLE’ SPORTS BAR • FUNCTION ROOM/SKITTLE ALLEY • FULLY EQUIPPED COMMERCIAL KITCHEN • DELIGHTFUL 4 BED OWNERS ACCOMMODATION • TRADE BEER GARDEN • PRIVATE OWNERS GARDEN • CAR PARK • COURTYARD LOCATION The property lies in the centre of the village of Milborne St Andrew. Milborne St Andrew is a central Dorset village situated in the Winterbourne valley on the Dorset Downs on the A354 road between Blandford and the busy A35 Dorset link road, 9 miles south west of Blandford. The village has a population of just over a thousand. Dorchester is the county town of Dorset, England and is situated between Poole and Bridport on the A35 trunk road, approximately 8 miles South West of the Royal Oak. A historic market town, Dorchester is on the banks of the river Frome to the north of the South Dorset Ridgeway which separates the area from Weymouth, 7 miles to the south. The area is popular with tourists, and particularly walkers and cyclists, throughout the year and is within easy driving distant of many tourist attractions and historic places of interest. The South Coast is only 12 miles from the pub. DESCRIPTION The property comprises of a two-storey detached property built in the late 18th century with a more recent extension to the east wing.
    [Show full text]
  • A WALK in VERNDITCH CHASE 1. a Tale of Two Long Barrows
    FOUNDATIONS OF ARCHAEOLOGY ‐ A WALK IN VERNDITCH CHASE 1. A Tale of two Long Barrows ‐ Long barrows were constructed as earthen or drystone mounds with flanking ditches and acted as funerary monuments during the Early and Middle Neolithic periods (3400‐ 2400 BC). They represent the burial places of Britain's early farming communities and, as such, are amongst the oldest field monuments surviving visibly in the present landscape. Where investigated, long barrows appear to have been used for communal burial, often with only parts of the human remains having been selected for interment. Certain sites provide evidence for several phases of funerary monument preceding the barrow and, consequently, it is probable that long barrows acted as important ritual sites for local communities over a considerable period of time. Some 500 long barrows are recorded in England. As one of the few types of Neolithic structure to survive as earthworks, and due to their comparative rarity, their considerable age and their longevity as a monument type, all long barrows are considered to be nationally important. 1 The 180 long barrows of Hampshire, Wiltshire and Dorset form the densest and one of the most significant concentrations of monuments of this type in the country. Such clusters are of great significance as they give an indication of the intensity with which areas were settled during the Neolithic period. Long barrow south‐west of Vernditch Chase – SAM No 1,012,945 The monument includes a long barrow set below the crest of a gentle south‐ facing slope in an area of undulating chalk downland.
    [Show full text]