Service Overview Rail System Map Detailed Fare in for Ma Tion
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chicago Transit Authority (CTA)
06JN023apr 2006.qxp 6/21/2006 12:37 PM Page 1 All Aboard! Detailed Fare Information First Bus / Last Bus Times All CTA and Pace buses are accessible X to people with disabilities. This map gives detailed information about Chicago Transit # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. Authority bus and elevated/subway train service, and shows Type of Fare* Full Reduced Reduced fares are for: You can use this chart to determine days, hours and frequency of service, and Fare Payment Farareboebox Topop where each route begins and ends. BROADWAY DIVISION ILLINOIS CENTER/NORTH WESTERN EXPRESS Pace suburban bus and Metra commuter train routes in the 36 70 Division/Austin east to Division/Clark 4:50a-12:40a 5:05a-12:40a 5:05a-12:40a 122 CASH FARE Accepted on buses only. $2 $1 Devon/Clark south to Polk/Clark 4:00a-12:10a 4:20a-12:00m 4:20a-12:15a Canal/Washington east to Wacker/Columbus 6:40a-9:15a & CTA service area. It is updated twice a year, and available at CTA Children 7 through 11 BUSES: CarCardsds It shows the first and last buses in each direction on each route, traveling Polk/Clark north to Devon/Clark 4:55a-1:20a 4:55a-1:05a 4:50a-1:15a Division/Clark west to Division/Austin 5:30a-1:20a 5:40a-1:20a 5:45a-1:20a 3:40p-6:10p Exact fare (both coins and bills accepted). No cash transfers available. years old. -
Spatial Variation in House Prices and the Opening of Chicago's Orange
1 Spatial Variation in House Prices and the Opening of Chicago’s Orange Line Daniel McMillen University of Illinois Department of Economics 1407 W. Gregory Dr. Urbana, IL 61801 [email protected] April 2018 Abstract The recent literature on the effect of public transit lines on property values has relied primarily on difference in difference estimation approaches. The standard difference in difference approach of comparing sales prices before and after the opening of a new transit line or station is not well suited to this analysis because prices typically rise well in advance of the new service and there is no clear treatment or control area. Moreover, estimated treatment effects are likely to vary spatially and are not necessarily uniform across the full spectrum of home prices. An analysis of home prices before and after the opening of Chicago’s Orange Line from the Loop to Midway Airport suggests that house prices began to rise near the new line about two years before the opening. Estimated appreciation rates are highest for relatively low priced homes, and there is signification spatial variation within the area close to the new line. 2 1. Introduction The large literature on the effects of transit lines on house prices began with straightforward hedonic regressions of house prices on distance to stations, typically using cross sectional data sets. Representative examples of the hedonic approach include Dewees (1976), Bajic (1983), and Voith (1993). Although the hedonic approach can establish whether prices are higher near transit stations, the results are likely to be biased by missing variables that themselves are correlated with transit access. -
Inner Circumferential Commuter Rail Feasibility Study
INNER CIRCUMFERENTIAL COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL REPORT and STV Inc. April 1999 Inner Circumferential Commuter Rail Feasibility Study TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE FOREWORD ............................................................. iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................ ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................. 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ......................................... 5 2.1 Alignment Options .................................................. 5 2.2 Description of Alignments ............................................ 8 2.3 Land Use and Zoning ................................................ 12 2.4 Potential Station Locations ............................................ 12 2.5 Environmental Issues ................................................ 19 3.0 FUTURE PLANS .................................................. 24 3.1 Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics .......................... 24 3.2 Municipal Development Plans. ........................................ 27 3.3 Railroads and Other Agencies .......................................... 34 4.0 POTENTIAL OPERATIONS ...................................... 39 4.1 Option 1: IHB-BRC ................................................. 40 4.2 Option 2 :MDW-BRC. .............................................. 41 4.3 Option 3: WCL-CSX-BRC ........................................... 42 4.4 Option 4: IHB-CCP-BRC ............................................ 43 5.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS .................................... -
Alternate Service Information
Project Overview Project Benefits CTA understands that our customers CTA is rebuilding the south Red Line Why is this work will experience longer-than-normal from just north of Cermak-Chinatown to commuting times during the Red Line South 95th/Dan Ryan. necessary? Reconstruction Project. Our goal is to provide a number of convenient travel options, and to The work will benefit Red Line riders for The Dan Ryan Branch opened in 1969, minimize the project’s impact as much decades to come—through faster travel when Richard Nixon was in the White House, as possible. times, increased reliability, and spruced-up a gallon of gas cost 35 cents and Gale Sayers stations with a variety of improvements. won the NFL rushing title. The original tracks To help guide you through your travel are well beyond their expected lifespan, and alternatives, CTA is providing a number Starting this May, the Red Line will be call for a complete replacement. Because of of travel options. You can read about completely closed for five months, from the the poor track condition, trains must travel the alternative service options for your Cermak-Chinatown station to the 95th Street slower—meaning trips are longer. Without neighborhood inside this brochure. Alternate Service station. CTA will offer several alternative travel rehabilitation, rail service will become even options during this closure to minimize the slower and the cost for replacement will In addition, to make travel easier for South Information impact on customers as much as possible continue to grow. Side residents during the project, CTA is (see other side of this brochure). -
Chicago Plan Commission July 15, 2009
Near North Mid South Near West Final Recommendations Report Adopted by Chicago Plan Commission July 15, 2009 In association with: MKC ASSOCIATES DRAFT Preliminary Recommendations May 2008 FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS TaBLE OF CONTENTS: 1 Acknowledgements 2 Project Overview 4 Study Area Descriptions 5 Community Input 6 Planning Recommendations 6 Public Investment to Foster Re-Connection S-1 Mid South Study Area W-1 Near West Study Area N-1 Near North Study Area FIGURES: S-5 Mid South Study Area Recommendations W-5 Near West Study Area Recommendations N-5 Near North South Study Area Recommendations TABLES: S-6 Implementation Actions Mid South W-6 Implementation Actions Near West N-6 Implementation Actions Near North Please send questions or comments to: Joanna Trotter For more information visit: Project Manager, Reconnecting Neighborhoods Metropolitan Planning Council www.ReconnectingNeighborhoods.org [email protected] (312) 863-6008 RECONNECTING NEIGHBORHOODS iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTERGOVERNMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Charles W. Abraham, Illinois Department of Transportation, Diane Gormely-Barnes, HNTB Corporation Division of Public and Intermodal Maria P. Hibbs, The Partnership for New Communities Andre Ashmore, Illinois Department of Commerce and Hon. Mattie Hunter, Illinois State Senate Economic Opportunity Joe Iacobucci, Chicago Transit Authority MarySue Barrett, Metropolitan Planning Council Bernita Johnson-Gabriel, Quad Communities Development Todd C. Brown (Co-Chair), ShoreBank Corp. Hon. Walter Burnett, Chicago City Council Lewis Jordan, Chicago Housing Authority William Burns, Conlon Public Strategies Inc. Catherine Kannenberg, Metra Carl Byrd, City of Chicago, Department of Housing Ileen E. Kelly, Independent Consultant Hon. Vi Daley, Chicago City Council Peter Levavi, Brinshore Development LLC Steve DeBretto, Industrial Council of Nearwest Chicago Hon. -
N:\JOE\RTCP\Interim Progress Report\Links\Report Cover.Tif
Final Report Submitted to Regional Transportation Authority REGIONAL TRANSIT COORDINATION PLAN: LOCATION STUDY prepared by BOOZ·ALLEN & HAMILTON INC. in association with WELSH PLANNING July 2001 This report is confidential and intended solely for the use and information of the company to whom it is addressed Table of Contents Disclaimer Page.........................................................................................................................1 Section 1 – Project Summary...................................................................................................2 Section 2 – Study Purpose .......................................................................................................5 Section 3 – Background............................................................................................................7 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................7 3.2 Assessment of Transit Coordination ...................................................................8 3.2.1 Physical Coordination.............................................................................9 3.2.2 Service Coordination .............................................................................10 3.2.3 Fare Coordination ..................................................................................10 3.2.4 Information Coordination.....................................................................11 3.2.5 Other Themes and Issues......................................................................13 -
Chicago Maps & Transit
CHICAGO MAPS & TRANSIT Airports | Taxis | Bus/Van Charter | Traveling By Car |Easy Public Transportation to and from Chicago http://visitchicagonorthshore.com/visitors_maps.cfm#public Exploring Chicago's North Shore is a breeze! This map was in your post-registration packet Chicago's North Shore is only 30 minutes from O'Hare International Airport and easily accessible from downtown Chicago, Midway Airport, Palwaukee Airport as well as by Amtrak, and the many rail and bus service providers in the Chicago Metropolitan area. Maps on this page allow you to view estimated travel times in the region, an overview of area with major highway routes and maps of the individual communities on the North Shore. Once here, there are numerous ways to explore the North Shore's magnificent surroundings. If you enjoy driving on your own, several local car rental companies service the North Shore as well as a fleet of clean, safe taxicabs and numerous limousine companies with friendly, knowledgeable chauffeurs on staff. And, if public transportation is more your speed, you're sure to find the North Shore's affordable bus and train services easy to navigate and the finest in the country! Whether you're coming or going, quality transportation is one of the North Shore's most valued assets. Airports O'Hare International Airport 773.686.2200 O'Hare International Airport handles more passengers than any other airport in the world. For visitors needing information or directions, airport information booths are located on the lower levels of the domestic terminals and on the upper and lower levels of the International Terminal. -
First Bus All Aboard! Rail System Map Detailed Fare in for Ma Tion Service
All aboard! Detailed fare in for ma tion First bus / last bus times This map gives detailed information about Chica go Transit Base/regular fares All CTA and Pace buses are accessible to people with disabilities. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUN./HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUN./HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUN./HOL. Authority bus and el e vat ed/sub way train ser vice, and shows Full Reduced Student Reduced fare program X Pay-per-ride fares, as deducted from value in a Ventra Transit Account Use this chart to determine days, hours of service, where each Pace subur ban bus and Metra commut er train routes in the The following groups are eligible to pay a reduced fare on CTA: CTA ser vice area. It is up dat ed regularly, and avail able at ‘L’ train fare $2.50* $1.25 75¢ route begins and ends, and first and last buses in each direction Wallace/Racine West Lawrence Inner Drive/Michigan Express 44 Racine/87th north to Halsted (Orange) 4:30a-9:40p 8:00a-6:00p 9:00a-6:00p 81W Cumberland (Blue) east to Jeff Park (Blue) 5:25a-10:25p 5:20a-10:20p 8:45a-10:15p 14 6 Berwyn (Red) south to Museum Campus 5:55a-10:40p 6:00a-10:40p 6:00a-10:40p † on each route. X X X CTA rail stations, Metra down town terminals, visitor cen ters, Bus fare $2.25 $1.10 75¢ Children 7 through 11 Halsted (Orange) south to Racine/87th 5:15a-10:25p 8:50a-6:45p 9:45a-6:45p Museum Campus north to Berwyn (Red) 7:00a-11:35p 6:50a-11:40p 6:50a-11:35p X Jeff Park X (Blue) west to Cumberland X (Blue) 4:55a-9:55p 4:50a-9:50p 8:20a-9:50p air ports, or by calling the RTA. -
Chicago Downtown Chicago Connections
Stone Scott Regional Transportation 1 2 3 4 5Sheridan 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Dr 270 ter ss C en 619 421 Edens Plaza 213 Division Division ne 272 Lake Authority i ood s 422 Sk 422 u D 423 LaSalle B w 423 Clark/Division e Forest y okie Rd Central 151 a WILMETTE ville s amie 422 The Regional Transportation Authority r P GLENVIEW 800W 600W 200W nonstop between Michigan/Delaware 620 421 0 E/W eehan Preserve Wilmette C Union Pacific/North Line 3rd 143 l Forest Baha’i Temple F e La Elm ollw Green Bay a D vice 4th v Green Glenview Glenview to Waukegan, Kenosha and Stockton/Arlington (2500N) T i lo 210 626 Evanston Elm n (RTA) provides financial oversight, Preserve bard Linden nonstop between Michigan/Delaware e Dewes b 421 146 s Wilmette 221 Dear Milw Foster and Lake Shore/Belmont (3200N) funding, and regional transit planning R Glenview Rd 94 Hi 422 221 i i-State 270 Cedar nonstop between Delaware/Michigan Rand v r Emerson Chicago Downtown Central auk T 70 e Oakton National- Ryan Field & Welsh-Ryan Arena Map Legend Hill 147 r Cook Co 213 and Marine/Foster (5200N) for the three public transit operations Comm ee Louis Univ okie Central Courts k Central 213 93 Maple College 201 Sheridan nonstop between Delaware/Michigan Holy 422 S 148 Old Orchard Gross 206 C Northwestern Univ Hobbie and Marine/Irving Park (4000N) Dee Family yman 270 Point Central St/ CTA Trains Hooker Wendell 22 70 36 Bellevue L in Northeastern Illinois: The Chicago olf Cr Chicago A Harrison 54A 201 Evanston 206 A 8 A W Sheridan Medical 272 egan osby Maple th Central Ser 423 201 k Illinois Center 412 GOLF Westfield Noyes Blue Line Haines Transit Authority (CTA), Metra and Antioch Golf Glen Holocaust 37 208 au 234 D Golf Old Orchard Benson Between O’Hare Airport, Downtown Newberry Oak W Museum Nor to Golf Golf Golf Simpson EVANSTON Oak Research Sherman & Forest Park Oak Pace Suburban bus. -
Signature Redacted Department of Urban Studies and Planning ) May 24, 2017 Signature Redacted Certified by Professor La Rence E
Examining the Impact of Residential Segregation on Rapid Transit Development in Chicago's South Side by Alaa Mukahhal Bachelor of Science in Architectural Studies University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2009) Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in City Planning at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2017 @ 2017 Alaa Mukahhal. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in any medium now known or hereafter created. Author Signature redacted Department of Urban Studies and Planning ) May 24, 2017 Signature redacted Certified by Professor La rence E. Susskind Thesis Supervisor "If' Accepted by Signature redacted MASSACHUSES INSTITUT EAssoc rofegsor P. Christopher Zegras OF TECHNOLOGY 1 MCP Committee Chair JUN 14 2017 LIBRARIES ARCHIVES 2 Examining the Impact of Residential Segregation on Rapid Transit Development in Chicago's South Side by Alaa Mukahhal Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on May 24, 2017, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in City Planning Abstract The striking contrast between two Chicago neighborhoods Hyde Park and Englewood which exist side by side is a prime example of what Edward Soja calls socially produced geographies of institutionalized racial segregation and what David Harvey terms as territorial injustice. Hyde Park with about 26,705 mostly white residents is a thriving economic center that has realized gains in property values and commercial investment. Nearby Woodlawn and Englewood have experienced declining populations, lower densities, lower property values, and increased vacancies that border Hyde Park, creating clear spatial lines of uneven development. -
Non-Work Travel Markets for the Future of Mass Transit
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DSpace@MIT Public Transportation is Not Going to Work: Non-Work Travel Markets for the Future of Mass Transit by Alexander Nobler Cohen B.A., Urban Studies Columbia University, 2001 Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master in City Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology February 2004 © 2004 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All Rights Reserved. Signature of Author: Department of Urban Studies and Planning January 21, 2004 Certified by: Joseph Ferreira Jr. Professor of Urban Planning and Operations Research Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Dennis Frenchman Chair, MCP Committee Department of Urban Studies and Planning Public Transportation is Not Going to Work: Non-Work Travel Markets for the Future of Mass Transit by Alexander Nobler Cohen Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on January 21, 2004 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in City Planning ABSTRACT For public transportation agencies to attract new riders in an automobile-dominated environment, niche markets must be targeted. The downtown journey to work is already recognized as a successful niche for transit. This thesis seeks to identify non-work travel markets with strong ridership potential. Nationwide data sources indicate that about half of all transit trips in the largest US cities are non- work trips, and that non-work travel has contributed to transit ridership growth in 13 of 20 large US cities. Based on these findings, St. -
Chicago Transit Authority Circle Line Alternatives Analysis Study
Chicago Transit Authority Circle Line Alternatives Analysis Study Screen Two Public Involvement Public Comments and Questions (Appendix) 12 February 2007 Comment No: 213 Topic Area: 4, 5, 6, 13 Received via: Email I attended the community meeting on Tuesday regarding the circle line. I was unable to stay for the entire question and answer session, so I apologize if these questions were addressed. I am concerned about the impact that a bus lane would have on Ashland and on North Avenue. If the bus alternative is considered, would it eliminate the parking on Ashland or the center plantings? On North Avenue a bus line would be unacceptable. We have waited 15 years for the new North Av. bridge to widen the street to 2 lanes as it crosses the river. Eliminating one of those lanes would make North Av more of a traffic nightmare than it is already. Is it feasible technically and financially to build connection down North avenue underground (under the river?) Above ground connection I believe will very adversely impact a very attractive and therefore desirable shopping destination by making it a dark cavern. The impact during construction of anything above ground would be unacceptable. I also question how the connection from Ogden and Division would be made to the North Av. redline station (or would it connect to the Division station instead?). Again the only plan that would not adversely impact the area/community is underground train lines. The area has finally started to have a pleasant streetscape which overhead rail lines would ruin f and bus lane going to that intersection (North & Clybourn) would be impossible.