Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip

Home , Ruislip

IMPERIAL HOUSE, VICTORIA ROAD, SOUTH RUISLIP

Proposed Lidl Foodstore

Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) On behalf of Lidl UK GmbH

May 2015 Project: Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip Proposed Lidl Foodstore

Client: Lidl UK GmbH

Document: Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015)

Gateway TSP ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx

Issue date: 8th May 2015

Status: v1

Authorised by: LF

Transport Planning & Design Surrey Technology Centre 40 Occam Road Guildford GU2 7YG

01483 685220 [email protected] www.gateway-tsp.co.uk CONTENTS

1 Introduction ...... 2 2 Servicing Arrangements...... 3 3 Trip Attraction...... 6 4 Traffic Impacts ...... 15 5 Stage 1 Road Safety Audit...... 20 6 Permitted Two-way Stonefield Way/Victoria Road Access Arrangement...... 21 7 Traffic Modelling...... 22 8 Conclusion...... 27

Appendices

Appendix A: Pre-application Meeting Minutes Appendix B: TRICS Trip Rate and Trips Calculations Appendix C: TRICS Outputs – Food Superstore Appendix D: TRICS Outputs – Car Showroom Appendix E: TRICS Outputs – Non-food Retail Appendix F: Extracts of ARLA Development Transport Assessment Appendix G: Extracts of Aldi Development Transport Statement and Technical Note Appendix H: Stage 1 Road Safety Audit of Proposed Site Access/Victoria Road Junction Appendix I: Decision Notice for Stonefield Way Highway Improvements Appendix J: JUNCTIONS 8 PICADY Output – Site Access/Victoria Road Appendix K: JUNCTIONS 8 PICADY Outputs – Stonefield Way/Victoria Road

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 1 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Gateway TSP is instructed by Lidl UK GmbH to prepare this second Technical Note to address Highway Officer comments received on a planning application (reference 5039/APP/2014/3715) to construct a Lidl foodstore and refurbish a number of units at the Stonefield Way Retail Park, Victoria Road, South Ruislip.

1.2 This Technical Note is structured to reflect the comments made by the Highway Officer at the London Borough of Hillingdon and seeks to address each point made. For ease for reference, the comments made by the Highway Officer are provided in italics, with the response to the comments provided below.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 2 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 2 SERVICING ARRANGEMENTS

“The servicing arrangements have not been revised and previously raised concerns have not been satisfactorily addressed by the technical note. It should be noted that this site will have multiple buildings and occupiers and it is not comparable to the Cowley Road or Botwell Lane Lidl sites, referenced in the technical note. The vehicular swept paths indicate that large vehicles will unacceptably impinge onto opposing traffic lanes and parking bays.”

Servicing Strategy

2.1 Servicing for the non-food retail units will be undertaken through an existing dedicated servicing area to the rear of the existing retail units. This servicing position does not alter from the existing arrangement.

2.2 Only the proposed Lidl foodstore will be serviced through a dedicated servicing bay accessible through the car park, where an overwhelming majority of parking spaces will be used only by Lidl customers. Therefore the proposed servicing arrangements are directly comparable to those at Cowley Road and Botwell Lane, which the London Borough of Hillingdon have recently accepted.

Pre-Application Servicing Discussions

2.3 Further to the pre-application meeting (see Appendix A for the pre-application meeting minutes) held on the 19th August 2014, a review of alternative servicing options was undertaken noting the comment made in the pre-application minutes stating (Page 3, Reason 3, bullet point 1):

“GTSP/Lidl to investigate alternative service access via Victoria Road, crossing the (now redundant) service road. Although all parties agreed that this was unlikely to be achievable.”

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 3 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 2.4 A subsequent telephone conversation with Syed Shah on the 22nd September 2014 confirmed that a second access directly onto Victoria Road was a potential solution to overcome previous concerns. This approach was subsequently adopted and forms the basis of the planning application.

2.5 With two customer accesses serving the redeveloped site, one onto Stonefield Way and one onto Victoria Road, Lidl have proposed that servicing access is taken from the Victoria Road access point, in order to minimise the length of car parking aisles that the servicing vehicle would need to negotiate. This would minimise the impacts of servicing within the car park on the non-food retail units.

2.6 The vehicle tracking drawings appended to the Transport Assessment indicate that servicing vehicles can successfully enter the servicing bay without passing close to any parking spaces or kerbs within the car park. In addition, the vehicle can enter and leave the car park without impinging onto oncoming traffic lanes on Victoria Road.

2.7 It can be seen from the above that the access strategy proposed by the planning application, including the second access on Victoria Road, responds directly to pre- application advice received from the Council. The servicing manoeuvre within the site is shown to be undertaken in a way that has recently been accepted at Botwell Lane, Hayes and should therefore be considered acceptable in principle.

Servicing Management Plan

2.8 A Servicing Management Plan was appended to the Transport Assessment to mitigate any potential issues arising from servicing the Lidl store from within the customer car parking area.

2.9 The issue of servicing was raised at the pre-application meeting held to discuss the revised proposals for this South Ruislip application. The minutes stated (Page 3, Reason 3, bullet point 2):

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 4 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 “If it is concluded that Lidl servicing can only be carried out as indicated in the previous application, i.e. via the customer access, a draft Servicing Management Plan (SMP) will be submitted with the new TA.”

2.10 Pursuant to the pre-application discussions, the applicant has explored alternative servicing solutions, which have been found to be unviable. Therefore the SMP was provided from the outset with the revised Transport Assessment, in accordance with agreed minutes of the pre-application meeting.

Servicing Arrangement Summary

2.11 There can be no reasonable justification for the Council to resist the proposed servicing strategy in light of the existing servicing provision for the site and the precedents set at Cowley Road (Uxbridge) and Botwell Lane (Hayes) both of which were deemed acceptable by the LPA.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 5 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 3 TRIP ATTRACTION

“The approach used in the TAR of transferring 1286sqm to Lidl from the 1915sqm of open A1 consent for the Comet and Benson Carpets buildings, is not considered satisfactory. This is particularly so because it is proposed to retain 521sqm and 422sqm open A1 retail for the Comet and Benson Carpet buildings respectively, it is inappropriate to presume that the trip generation rates for three smaller food retail units would be the same as the larger single unit. In addition, while the planning fallback position is that Lidl could occupy the existing Comet and Benson Carpet Units,(as indicated in paragraph 1.9 of the Technical note), the assessment of the transport impacts are also required to consider changes relative to existing traffic conditions - i.e. without the 1915sqm open A1 use.”

3.1 There are a number of aspects to this comment that need consideration within the planning context.

i) Whilst an assessment of the Lidl foodstore (1,286sqm) and the remaining units in A1 Comparison goods use could be undertaken, this would result in a net decrease in trips associated with the site, since the Open A1 floorspace would reduce. Therefore by all normal transport planning conventions it is not necessary to assess this scenario in detail because a more robust assessment has been undertaken.

ii) The principle that an element of Open A1 floorspace could remain within the vacant units is not unusual and forms a valid and accepted planning position between the Applicant and LPA (see pre-application minutes). Some retail operators would need an element of Open A1 to sell limited food items e.g. Poundland or The Range.

iii) The planning context is such that the lawful permitted use of the site comprises 1,915sqm of Open A1 floor space and therefore an assessment

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 6 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 without this as a baseline is not acceptable in planning terms given that the site remains occupied and was fully occupied until only recently.

3.2 The trip generation assessment has used dedicated end user surveys in accordance with good practice guidance. Reasoned justification has been provided for the use of these surveys to identify representative trip rates for the site.

3.3 Nevertheless, in response to the Council’s comments a sensitivity assessment has been undertaken making use of surveyed ‘Food Superstore’ sites located within the London area, which has been used to establish the existing baseline situation (1,915 sqm of Open A1 floor space) for comparison against the proposed future site operation.

3.4 Tables containing the TRICS trip rates, calculated trips and parking accumulations for the scenarios listed below is included at Appendix B for both the weekday and Saturday periods.

Baseline Position

Open A1 (Food Superstore) - 1,915sqm Assessment

3.5 To calculate the trip attracting potential of the permitted Open A1 floorspace, the TRICS category ’01 Retail: A – Food Superstore’ has been used to present the most robust assessment of the permitted Open A1 use. Sites within England (including Greater London) has been used, with retail floorspace limited to 7,000 square metres and with no petrol filling station. The Food Supermarket TRICS outputs are included at Appendix C, with Table 3.1 below providing the weekday morning and evening peak hour trip rates and associated trips.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 7 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour (08:00 – 09:00) (17:00 – 18:00) Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures Vehicular Trip Rates 4.140 2.719 7.618 7.920 Vehicular Trips 79 52 146 152

Table 3.1: Weekday Peak Hour Trips – 1,915 sqm Open A1

3.6 Table 3.1 indicates that the permitted Open A1 floorspace could attract 131 vehicular trips in the weekday morning peak hour and 298 vehicular trips in the weekday evening peak hour.

3.7 Table 3.2 below provides the trip attracting potential during the Saturday peak hour; again the TRICS output is included at Appendix C.

Saturday Peak Hour (14:00 – 15:00) Arrivals Departures Vehicular Trip Rates 8.132 8.259 Vehicular Trips 156 158

Table 3.2: Saturday Peak Hour Trips – 1,915 sqm Open A1

3.8 Table 3.2 indicates that the permitted site Open A1 floorspace could attract 314 vehicular trips during the Saturday peak hour.

3.9 It should be noted that Tables 2 and 8 of the trip generation summary included at Appendix B provide the associated parking accumulation across both a weekday and Saturday period for an Open A1 use of 1,915 square metres. The results of the accumulation indicate a peak parking demand of 108 spaces on a weekday and 123 on a Saturday. In its current form, there are 85 parking spaces at the site, which is significantly below the level of demand anticipated for the worst-case use of the site and demonstrates that from the outset, the London Borough of Hillingdon has accepted the site with an element of parking constraint.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 8 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 Sui Generis Floorspace – 2,150 sqm Former Car Showroom

3.10 To calculate the trip attracting potential of the permitted Sui Generis floorspace, the TRICS category ’14 Car Show Rooms: A – Car Show Rooms’ has been used, for sites located within England (including Greater London). The Car Showroom TRICS outputs are included at Appendix D, whilst Table 3.3 below provides the weekday morning and evening peak hour trip rates and associated trips.

Weekday Morning Peak Hour Weekday Evening Peak Hour (08:00 – 09:00) (17:00 – 18:00) Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures Vehicular Trip Rates 0.818 0.387 0.312 0.499 Vehicular Trips 18 8 7 11

Table 3.3: Weekday Peak Hour Trips – 2,150 sqm Sui Generis

3.11 Table 3.3 indicates that the permitted Sui Generis land use could attract 26 vehicle movements in the weekday morning peak hour and 18 vehicle trips in the weekday evening peak hour.

3.12 Table 3.4 below provides the trip attracting potential during the Saturday peak hour; the TRICS output is included at Appendix D.

Saturday Peak Hour (14:00 – 15:00) Arrivals Departures Vehicular Trip Rates 0.651 0.498 Vehicular Trips 14 11

Table 3.4: Saturday Peak Hour Trips – 2,150 sqm Sui Generis

3.13 Table 3.4 indicates that the permitted Sui Generis site use could attract 25 vehicle trips during the Saturday peak hour.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 9 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 Baseline Net Peak Hour Vehicular Profile

3.14 Tables 3.1 to 3.4 above provide a vehicular trip assessment of the baseline, permitted site uses. Table 3.5 below provides the total peak hour vehicle trips that could be attracted to the site, drawing on the trips calculated in the above tables.

Weekday Morning Weekday Evening Saturday Peak Hour Peak Hour (08:00 – Peak Hour (17:00 – (14:00 – 15:00) 09:00) 18:00) Arr Dep Arr Dep Arr Dep Food Superstore 79 52 146 152 156 158 Car Showroom 18 8 7 11 14 11 TOTAL 97 60 153 163 170 169

Table 3.5: Total Permitted Site Use Trip Attraction

3.15 Table 3.5 indicates that the permitted site uses could attract 157 vehicular trips in the weekday morning peak hour and 316 vehicular trips in the weekday evening peak hour. During the Saturday peak hour, the site could attract 339 vehicular trips.

Development Proposals

3.16 The development proposals consist of the Sui Generis land use being removed from the site, with a net increase of 943 square metres of non-food retail (NFR) floorspace on the site as explained in the Transport Assessment, Planning Statement and first Technical Note.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 10 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 Proposed Non-food Retail Floorspace Increase

3.17 To provide an indication of the trip attracting potential of the net increase of non-food retail at the site, the TRICS database has been used for the category ’01 Retail: G – Other Individual Non-food Superstore’ for sites located within England (including Greater London) with a retail floor area of up to 7,000 square metres. The Saturday assessment excludes a site with a petrol station and a site with 340 parking spaces (GM-01-G-04). The TRICS outputs are included at Appendix E, with Table 3.6 below detailing the identified peak hour trip rates and trips, based on the 943 square metre net increase in non-food retail sales floorspace.

Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak Saturday Peak Arr Dep Arr Dep Arr Dep Vehicular Trip Rates 0.486 0.257 1.864 1.958 3.896 3.875 Vehicular Trips 5 2 18 18 37 37

Table 3.6: Non-Food Retail Trips – 943 sqm NFR

3.18 Table 3.6 indicates that the net increase in non-food retail floorspace could attract 7 vehicular trips in the weekday morning peak hour and 36 vehicular trips in the weekday evening peak hour. During the Saturday peak hour, the net increase in non-food retail floorspace could attract 74 vehicular trips.

3.19 As part of the development proposal, an increase of 19 parking spaces is proposed, which represents the maximum amount of parking that can be provided within the constrained site area. This represents an improvement to the permitted site constrained parking provision and alongside car parking management measures to restrict durations of stay, represents a net benefit for the future operation of the site.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 11 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 Assessment Requested by London Borough of Hillingdon Highway Officer

3.20 At the request of the Highway Officer, a theoretical assessment has been provided in Table 3.7 below to illustrate a scenario in which the 1,286sqm foodstore proposal generates Open A1 Food Superstore trip rates, whilst the remaining 1,572 sqm floorspace is assumed to be A1 Non-food retail. These floorspace assumptions have been applied to the trip rates identified in Tables 3.1, 3.2 and 3.6 respectively.

Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak Saturday Peak Hour Hour Hour Arr Dep Arr Dep Arr Dep Food Retail 53 35 98 102 105 106 Vehicular Trips Non-Food Retail 8 4 29 31 61 61 Vehicular Trips TOTAL 61 39 127 133 166 167

Table 3.7: Theoretical Assessment of Units – LBH Request

3.21 A full summary of the weekday theoretical assessment is provided in Tables 5 and 6 of the summary provided in Appendix B, which also provides a comparison of this assessment against the permitted use of the site. The analysis indicates that a net reduction of 325 two-way vehicle movements could occur over the course of a weekday as a result of the theoretical assessment undertaken.

3.22 Likewise, the Saturday theoretical assessment is summarised in Tables 11 and 12 of the Appendix B summary and indicates that in comparison with the permitted use of the site over the course of a typical Saturday, a net reduction of 373 two-way vehicle movements could occur. Overall reductions in vehicular arrivals and departures are recorded across all hours except the single peak hour assessed between the theoretical assessment and the baseline permitted use.

3.23 To provide a context for the theoretical assessment summarised in Table 3.7, the net total flows are compared with the existing permitted use of the site in Table 3.8 below.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 12 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak Saturday Peak Hour Hour Hour Arr Dep Arr Dep Arr Dep Permitted Open 79 52 146 152 156 158 A1 Baseline Theoretical 61 39 127 133 166 167 Assessment NET IMPACT -36 -21 -26 -30 +10 +9

Table 3.8: Net Impact of Theoretical Assessment Compared to Permitted Baseline

3.24 Table 3.8 demonstrates that the assessment undertaken for the permitted baseline is robust, since the theoretical assessment requested by the Highway Officer presents a net reduction in vehicle movements across weekday peak hours and a potential minor increase in a Saturday peak hour.

Further Comments

3.25 Additional comments were made in respect of:

• Trip type proportions; • Lidl sites used in the assessment; and • Trip reductions for sustainability measures.

3.26 Based on the evidence provided in this Technical Note, the assessment that has been provided within the Transport Assessment satisfies the position agreed with the LPA at the pre-application stage and represents a robust assessment of the development’s impact. The theoretical trip assessment requested by the Highway Officer has now been provided, which clearly indicates that it would result in an overall reduction in trips associated with the site.

3.27 Given the above, it is not appropriate to adjust any of the trip assessment parameters adopted in the Transport Assessment for this application.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 13 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 3.28 We therefore stand by the lawful planning position attached to the site and in particular the floor area figures presented in this planning application, which identify a net increase of 943 square metres of A1 non-food retail/comparison goods. This could generate a further 7 two-way vehicle movements in the weekday morning peak, 36 two-way vehicle movements in the weekday evening peak hour and 74 two-way movements during the Saturday peak hour.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 14 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 4 TRAFFIC IMPACTS

Committed Development

“The technical note surprisingly indicates that the impact of committed developments would not have a material impact on Victoria Road, given the scale of ARLA and Sainsbury developments. This matter requires to be reassessed to provide a fuller explanation and/or a correction made.”

4.1 In accordance with the Council’s request at the pre-application meeting on 19th August 2014, the ARLA Transport Assessment and the Aldi Transport Statement were reviewed as committed development. This review revealed that both developments would result in a net reduction in vehicular movements in the proximity of the proposed Lidl store along Victoria Road.

4.2 To address the Council’s comments in relation to committed development, the justification for the position outlined within the Transport Assessment and previous Technical Note is reiterated below.

ARLA Transport Assessment Review

4.3 A Transport Assessment has been prepared by Redwood Partnership in support of the development proposals at the ARLA site, Victoria Road, South Ruislip. The sections of the report referred to below are included for ease of reference in Appendix F.

4.4 This report assesses the impact of the development on the surrounding highway network and Paragraph 4.85 (page 57) refers to impacts of the development on the Victoria Road/Field End Road roundabout junction located to the east of the proposed Lidl development. Paragraph 4.85 states:

“A relative impact assessment has been undertaken for this junction… The results show that there will be a reduction in peak hour traffic levels at this roundabout.”

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 15 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 4.5 In addition, the results of the VISSIM modelling undertaken to support the proposals state in Paragraph 4.98 (Page 61) that:

“the summary of the VISSIM modelling output suggests that the development proposals will have a minimal negative impact on the highway network…journey times will generally reduce for both general traffic and buses.”

4.6 The ARLA Transport Assessment also assumes occupation of the existing Comet unit on the site of the proposed Lidl foodstore, as a committed development (TA, Page 34), and therefore including the ARLA site as a committed development would in reality result in a double counting of vehicle movements associated with the Lidl site.

4.7 Figures F265 and F266 appended to the Redwood Partnership TA provide figure diagrams detailing the net impact of the development proposals on the surrounding highway network during the weekday evening peak hour and the Saturday peak hour.

4.8 Figure F265 indicates that the proposed redevelopment of the ARLA site would result in a reduction in vehicular trips passing the proposed Lidl store, in the order of 2 vehicular trips at the Victoria Road/Field End Road roundabout during the weekday evening peak hour.

4.9 Figure F266 indicates that the development could generate an increase of 10 vehicular trips along the site frontage during the Saturday peak hour. This increase is not considered material to the highway network and is within normal daily fluctuations. Coupled with the reduction in overall journey times across the highway network, it is reasonable to conclude that the use of TEMPRO growth factors represents a robust approach to account for generalised growth in the area when assessing the implication of the Lidl development proposals.

4.10 On the basis of the above, no further assessment of the ARLA committed development is necessary to account for material alterations in background traffic flows on the highway network.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 16 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 Aldi Transport Statement Review

4.11 To support the proposals for the Aldi and B&M stores at the Victoria Road Retail Park, South Ruislip, a Transport Statement and post-application Technical Note have been prepared by Vectos. Extracts are attached at Appendix G.

4.12 Table 5.6 (page 19) of the Vectos Transport Statement provides a net impact of the Aldi development against a consented use of the site. Table 5.6 of the Vectos TS is replicated in Table 4.1 below for ease of reference.

Friday Peak Saturday Peak Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures Proposed Development 49 53 82 84 Approved Scheme 58 58 117 99 DIFFERENCE -9 -5 -35 -15

Table 4.1: Vehicle Trip Generation Comparison – Approved vs Proposed (Table 5.6 from Vectos TS)

4.13 Paragraph 5.14 of the Vectos TS (page 19) summarises the above table and states:

“the proposed development will result in a reduction in vehicle trips during both the Friday and Saturday peak periods.”

4.14 In addition, the Aldi scheme is a committed development within the ARLA Transport Assessment, which have been demonstrated not to have a material impact on the highway network around the application site. A stand-alone consideration of the Aldi store would therefore result in the double counting of vehicles associated with the site.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 17 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 4.15 A Technical Note was prepared by Vectos post-application in which Sainsbury’s trip rates were applied to the site, at the request of Highway Officers at the London Borough of Hillingdon. Table 7 of the Technical Note (page 4) provides a comparison in vehicle trips between the consented scheme and proposed Aldi development of the site. Table 7 is replicated in Table 4.2 below.

Friday Peak Saturday Peak Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures Proposed Development 70 71 101 88 Consented Scheme 58 58 117 99 DIFFERENCE +12 +13 -16 -11

Table 4.2: Vehicle Trip Generation Comparison – Consented vs Proposed (Table 7 from Vectos TN)

4.16 Paragraph 25 (page 5) of the Technical Note summarises the Table above, and states:

“the proposed development using the worst case trip rate would result in a minor increase in trips during the Friday peak period and reduction in trips during the Saturday peak. It is considered that the proposed increase will have a minor impact on the site access junction and a negligible impact once distributed around the local highway network.”

4.17 It is also noted that the Planning Officers’ Report to Planning Committee Members summarises the traffic impacts of the Aldi development in section 7.10 as follows:

“As this proposal does not involve any alterations to the car parking or traffic arrangements, the proposed variation to a condition would not cause harm to traffic and parking.”

4.18 On this basis, since the Aldi development contributes a net reduction in vehicular trips compared to the site’s consented use, growth factors obtained from the TEMPRO database are considered appropriate to account for development at the Lidl site.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 18 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 Committed Development Summary

4.19 The Transport Assessment and subsequent Technical Notes have made reference to the committed development sites as requested, but given that the accompanying Transport Assessments/Statements have been approved with conclusions to the effect that there are no material impacts on the surrounding highway network and overall net reductions in flows during some peak periods, there is no justification for any further assessment to be undertaken.

4.20 It should also be noted that the ARLA application was consented with a modelling scenario which included both the Aldi site and the Lidl application site as committed developments, operating with an Open A1 food superstore operator and yet there was predicted to be a reduction in journey time across the network and an overall net peak hour reduction in vehicle movements at the Field End Road/Victoria Road roundabout to the east.

4.21 There is no justification on this basis to further assess the committed developments in the surrounding area and also to undertake more extensive network capacity modelling since this has been undertaken and approved in a cumulative worst case scenario in the ARLA application and has been approved by the LPA.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 19 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 5 STAGE 1 ROAD SAFETY AUDIT

“A stage 1 safety audit will be required for the proposed new junction on Victoria Road.”

5.1 A Stage 1 Road Safety Audit was undertaken of the proposed Victoria Road/Site Access junction. This report can be found at Appendix H.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 20 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 6 PERMITTED TWO-WAY STONEFIELD WAY/VICTORIA ROAD ACCESS ARRANGEMENT

“My request for modelling to be calibrated and validated relates to existing junctions under existing conditions. This is normally done by comparing modelling results with observed data of existing traffic flows and the corresponding queue lengths/delays. Where there is no existing junction, the reference existing operational performance would be that there is no queuing/delay and this would not require modelling.

This request applies to the existing Stonefield Way / Victoria Road junction because I understand that the approved changes at the Stonefield Way/Victoria Road (two way) was predicated on Lidl occupying the Comet/Bensons units. The current application proposals have revised this context and it would be appropriate for the need / design for these highway works to also be reviewed and updated.”

6.1 The decision notice for the approved (planning application reference 41266/APP/2012/2939) highway improvements to the Stonefield Way/Victoria Road junction is included at Appendix I. Please note that this consented highway improvement is not linked to an identified occupier at the Stonefield Way Retail Park and therefore this comment made by the Highway Officer is incorrect in planning terms.

6.2 On the basis of the above, given the existing planning position and the consented nature of the highway works, there is no identifiable justification for alterations to the approved junction when the proposals at the site have not materially altered. Rather, the introduction of a second access onto Victoria Road as a result of servicing concerns raised by the LPA means that there may be a net reduction in vehicle flows associated with the site, meaning that the consented scheme represents and maintains a robust baseline for the junction operation.

6.3 This decision notice does not mention Lidl occupying any of the units on the Stonefield Way Retail Park, and accordingly the accepted highway works would be considered acceptable in terms of scale and design with the current proposals.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 21 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 7 TRAFFIC MODELLING

Scope of Traffic Modelling

“Modelling of other junctions along Victoria Road affected by traffic from the proposed development with committed developments is required.”

7.1 The minutes of the pre-application meeting (included at Appendix A), undertaken on the 19th August 2014, state (Page 3, bullet point 3):

“SS [Syed Shah] initially stated that new surveys would be required but subsequently agreed after the meeting with GTSP that the previous data and background growth statistics would suffice.”

7.2 On this basis, no additional surveys were undertaken with the scope of junction modelling agreed with Highway Officers at the London Borough of Hillingdon.

7.3 Further to this, please note the findings of the committed development review in Section 4, which have identified that even when a cumulative assessment of future development is undertaken across the local highway network, local junctions to the Lidl application site are identified to have a net reduction in vehicle movements and overall journey times improve across the site.

7.4 It is also worth noting that the Lidl proposal would result in a net reduction in vehicle movements across the site based on the existing Open A1 consented floorspace across the site based on the trip generation assessment requested by the Highway Officer and summarised in Section 1.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 22 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 Site Access Traffic Modelling

“The traffic modelling results of junction performance are dependent on the demand flows (from existing, committed, growth and proposed development) on the network and because these are subject of the above reservations, it is inappropriate to comment on the results. It is however necessary to explain why the junction has used a flat demand profile for one hour periods rather than the conventional one and a half hour modelling period with 15 minute pre-peak and 15 minute post peak period. Furthermore the modelling / results for the Sat. 2016 Baseline + permitted scenario show the RFC ratios decreasing over the hour - an explanation is required.”

7.5 The junction capacity modelling provided within the Transport Assessment, replicates the modelling that was undertaken and approved by the LPA in the consented highway improvement scheme at Victoria Road/Stonefield Way.

7.6 Taking account of the comments made, the previously modelled flows have been re- run through JUNCTIONS 8 PICADY in a ‘Direct’ traffic profile (therefore over a 60 minute period), to demonstrate the operation of the junction with the flows observed in 15 minute intervals. The JUNCTIONS 8 user guide states that ‘Direct’ mode is the most accurate method of entering flows. The operation of both surveyed junctions in the revised modelling profile format is provided in the following sub-sections.

Site Access/Victoria Road Junction

7.7 The weekday morning, evening and Saturday peak hours have been modelled using the 2016 baseline with development scenario as presented within the Transport Assessment. This junction is proposed as part of the planning application and has no prior planning approval and is therefore only modelled in the proposed development scenario.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 23 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 7.8 The full JUNCTIONS 8 PICADY modelling output and a plan providing the geometric parameters used to create the model is included at Appendix J with Table 7.1 providing a summary of the results over the peak hours assessed.

Arm 2016 AM + Prop 2016 PM + Prop 2016 Saturday + Dev Dev Prop Dev RFC Queue RFC Queue RFC Queue (PCU) (PCU) (PCU) Lidl Access (left turn) 0.02 0.02 0.08 0.09 0.13 0.15 Lidl Access (right turn) 0.02 0.02 0.19 0.23 0.25 0.32 Victoria Road (w) 0.02 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.15 0.17

Table 7.1: JUNCTIONS 8 PICADY Output – 2016 with Development Scenarios

7.9 Table 7.1 indicates that the proposed Site Access/Victoria Road junction would operate within its theoretical capacity in all scenarios modelled, with a maximum RFC of 0.25 for vehicle movements leaving the site and turning right onto Victoria Road. This indicates that the junction design operates well below the 0.850 design capacity for new junctions of this type.

7.10 Since the junction is not in operation at present, it is not possible to calibrate or validate the capacity modelling.

Stonefield Way/Victoria Road Two-way Junction Arrangement

7.11 The 2016 weekday morning, evening and Saturday peak hour junction assessments are summarised in Tables 7.2 to 7.4 respectively, with the permitted and proposed development impacts modelled in each peak hour. The full JUNCTIONS 8 PICADY outputs and a plan detailing the geometric parameters used to construct the model is included at Appendix K.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 24 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 7.12 It should be noted that direct access onto Victoria Road only occurs in the proposed development scenario and therefore the permitted baseline accommodates all 1,915 sqm permitted Open A1 use through the Stonefield Way/Victoria Road junction, whereas development flows are split amongst two junction in the proposed development scenario. The RFC and queue lengths at the Stonefield Way/Victoria Road junction will therefore decrease, since not all peak hour vehicle movements are going through the junction as demonstrated in the existing permitted site situation.

Arm 2016 Weekday AM plus 2016 Weekday AM plus Permitted Development Proposed Development RFC Queue (PCU) RFC Queue (PCU) Stonefield Way 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 Victoria Road (w) 0.26 0.36 0.25 0.34

Table 7.2: JUNCTIONS 8 PICADY Output – 2016 Weekday AM Scenarios

Arm 2016 Weekday PM plus 2016 Weekday PM plus Permitted Development Proposed Development RFC Queue (PCU) RFC Queue (PCU) Stonefield Way 0.31 0.43 0.10 0.11 Victoria Road (w) 0.29 0.42 0.25 0.36

Table 7.3: JUNCTIONS 8 PICADY Output – 2016 Weekday PM Scenarios

Arm 2016 Saturday plus Permitted 2016 Saturday plus Proposed Development Development RFC Queue (PCU) RFC Queue (PCU) Stonefield Way 0.45 0.73 0.37 0.53 Victoria Road (w) 0.13 0.15 0.06 0.07

Table 7.4: JUNCTIONS 8 PICADY Output – 2016 Saturday Scenarios

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 25 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 7.13 Tables 7.2 to 7.4 indicate that the permitted two-way Stonefield Way/Victoria Road junction arrangement works well within its theoretical capacity in all scenarios modelled. The maximum RFC occurs in the 2016 Saturday plus permitted development scenario, with an RFC of 0.45 recorded on the Stonefield Way arm. There are no predicted issues with queuing at the junction with a maximum queue of less than 1 PCU recorded in each scenario.

“The distribution of traffic exiting from the development will need to be added to upstream junctions - This does not appear to have been done with the current modelling”

7.14 The modelling of the site access junctions undertaken within this Technical Note has ensured that the vehicle movements associated with the development are included in both junction models where appropriate. Further junction modelling was agreed not to be necessary as part of the pre-application discussions, please see earlier points made in this Technical Note.

Modelling Summary

7.15 In summary, the extent of the modelling scope was agreed at the pre-application stage, when the Highway Officer confirmed that additional surveys were not required. The junction capacity modelling was then undertaken based on the accepted modelling profile used in the consented highway improvement scheme. In any event the trip forecasts on which the models are based are highly robust and it has been demonstrated that modelling of remote junctions is not warranted.

7.16 Taking on board the Highway Officer comments, the junction capacity modelling has been re-run within the latest software – JUNCTIONS 8 PICADY using a direct profile for a 60 minute period. The results of the revised modelling indicate that both junctions assessed perform well within theoretical design capacity in all of the assessment periods undertaken and queuing is minimal.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 26 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015 8 CONCLUSION

8.1 Gateway TSP is instructed by Lidl UK GmbH to prepare this Technical Note to address comments received on a planning application (reference 5039/APP/2014/3715) to construct a Lidl Foodstore on the site of the former Imperial House car dealership at the Stonefield Way Retail Park, Victoria Road, South Ruislip.

8.2 This Technical Note provides further information as requested by the Highway Officer at the London Borough of Hillingdon in his comments received on the 23rd April 2015, and seeks to provide all necessary information upon which the application can be determined.

Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip 27 Technical Note 2: Response to Highway Officer Comments (23rd April 2015) Ref: MF/13-0917 TN2 v1.docx May 2015

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A Pre-application Meeting Minutes Proposed Foodstore at Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip Pre-application Meeting Notes

15:00, 19th August 2014 - LB Hillingdon Civic Centre

Attendees: Adrian Waite (LB Hillingdon Planning) Syed Shah (LB Hillingdon Highways) James Barrett (Lidl) Danny Hazlehurst (Lidl) Henry Neel (Lidl) Matt Morris (GVA) Tim Sturgess (GVA) Steven Giles (Gateway TSP)

Procedural Matters

- Following introductions, MM explained the purpose of the meeting was to clarify the development proposals; discuss the details behind the wording associated with the reasons for refusal; and to agree the level/detail of additional information (where required) to accompany a future resubmission.

- It was agreed that the agenda for the meeting should follow the reasons for refusal, and that these would be discussed in the order that they are listed on the decision notice.

1. Reason 1 - Sequential Test and Impact on Centres

- MM sought clarification behind the wording of the first reason for refusal with reference to ‘the application fails to demonstrate that there are no sequentially preferable sites, nor that it would not result in unacceptable impacts on the vitality and viability of nearby town centres’. AW explained that this concerned the level of information provided for the sequential and impact assessments.

Sequential Assessment

- AW explained that at the time that the application was being considered, it was brought to officer’s attention (through non-related pre-application requests) that additional sites that potentially could accommodate the development may have been/continue to be available. AW specifically highlighted the two units at 428A Victoria Road, and office buildings at Eagle Point. We understand that subsequent to the refusal of the proposed Lidl store, an application has been submitted to widen the sale of goods of the two units at 428A Victoria Road and that prior approval for residential use is being sought for the office buildings at Eagle Point. As a result, AW stated that both sites may now be unavailable, but that this should be demonstrated through an updated sequential assessment as part of any resubmission.

- MM queried whether officers were aware of any further sites that should be considered as part of a revised sequential assessment. AW confirmed they were not aware of any further sites to be considered.

- MM stated that the revised sequential assessment should seek to accommodate the proposal as a whole (new foodstore and resulting comparison retail floorspace). AW confirmed this would be acceptable.

Impact on Centres

- MM explained that the existing open-A1 units on site provide a realistic fall-back position that should be considered in the context of a proposed application for a new foodstore. AW queried whether Lidl would operate from the existing units given that they are likely to require a fixed format store. DH explained that it had been Lidl’s intention to occupy the existing units when the site was originally purchased. The proposal for a new foodstore on the site has only been a possibility since Comet went into administration. This has resulted in more financial flexibility for Lidl to build a new store. MM confirmed that Lidl would operate from this site, either from the existing units from an uncontrolled basis, or via consent for a new store, providing the Council with the opportunity for planning control and to secure the wider economic benefits the development would bring.

- DH stated that Lidl would be able to supply an example of where they have employed a similar process of transferring A1 consents.

- AW explained that the Council would require a robust approach which demonstrates the worst case scenario (i.e. consideration of the convenience element). AW stated that this would be the most appropriate way to approach the site in terms of explaining the proposals and potential impacts to members, who will ultimately decide the application at committee.

It was agreed that the following retail impact assessment scenarios should be considered as part of the revised submission:

a. The ‘fall back’ position, which is to convert the old Comet unit to a Lidl store and leave the Imperial House building as it is. (Assessing the resulting retail impact which there would be no control over). b. Transfer of open A1 to Lidl and assess the new bulky goods unit only, as per previous application (Assessing the bulky goods only, on the basis that the fall-back will happen). c. Impact of new Lidl and impact of new bulky goods unit (Assessing impact of both).

- AW also highlighted that the Council need to be robust in their approach of assessment of cumulative impact, as they have also recently received other applications in South Ruislip at the 428A Victoria Road (as previously discussed) and the former Dairy Site.

- MM explained that these are not yet commitments and so technically should not be considered. Furthermore, the proposed Lidl store is unlikely to have an impact on the town centre convenience offer (Sainsbury’s) as its direct competitors are other discounters. Therefore, its principal impact will be on Aldi at the 428 Victoria Road scheme should it come forward. However, it was agreed that any resubmission would be accompanied by a retail impact assessment of the foodstore, in addition to the comparison retail element.

- MM queried the response received from LB Harrow. AW explained that LB Harrow had previously sought blanket objections on the basis that applications had not considered Harrow Town Centre. However, this has since been considered against the former Dairy Site application, and LB Harrow now had no objection against the Asda element of this scheme. Therefore, AW stated he did not envisage an objection to any future application at the Imperial House site.

- MM proposed that a retail scoping note be submitted to agree the retail elements of the application prior to any resubmission. AW agreed this would be appropriate and the Council would assist.

2. Reason 2 – Transport Assessment

- AW/SS stated that three transport impact scenarios should be considered within any revised submission:

a. Transfer of open A1 to Lidl, as per previous application b. Transfer of open A1 to any A1 retailer (e.g. Tesco), c. The ‘fall back’ position, which is to convert the old Comet unit to a Lidl store and leave the Imperial House building as it is.

- SS acknowledged that (b) was less likely than (a) or (c) but that it would have the greatest potential impact. SS accepted that (b) would be included and referred to as a sensitivity test or ‘worst case’ scenario.

- GTSP to compare own Lidl trip rate data with those produced by TRICS for discount food retailers and consider distribution by trip type, i.e. linked trips being more likely to be to/from the town centre, whereas primary trips are more likely to/from the surrounding residential catchment areas.

– GTSP to review; the Lidl Slough questionnaire data (2010); the ARLA Transport Assessment; the Aldi Transport Statement and comment on each in the TA

- SS initially stated that new surveys would be required but subsequently agreed after the meeting with GTSP that the previous data and background growth statistics would suffice.

- GTSP to provide diagrams showing the measurement of geometric parameters used in the PICADY traffic models. 3. Reason 3 – Servicing Arrangements

- GTSP/Lidl to investigate alternative service access via Victoria Road, crossing the (now redundant) service road. Although all parties agreed that this was unlikely to be achievable.

- If it is concluded that Lidl servicing can only be carried out as indicated in the previous application, i.e. via the customer access, a draft Servicing Management Plan (SMP) will be submitted with the new TA.

4. Reason 4 – Flooding: Sequential Test

- AW explained that the reason for refusal highlighted that as the site was in Flood Zone 2, a sequential test should accompany any future application. JB drew attention to the Flood Risk Consultant’s response, that because this is a ‘less vulnerable’ development proposed within Flood Zone 2, the development is deemed appropriate in flood risk terms (according to the NPPF) and therefore a Sequential Test is not required.

- MM queried why a sequential assessment was required, but it was agreed that if this was required, it would be provided without prejudice.

5. Reason 5 – Flooding: SUDS

- JB explained that Lidl had instructed a revised FRA to be prepared which takes account of SUDS. DH stated that the methodology to be used would apply only to the site of the proposed foodstore, rather than the site in its entirety, as no physical works are proposed to the remainder of the site. AW confirmed that this would be a practical approach, but that it should demonstrate that there is a betterment.

6. Reason 6 – Energy Efficiency

- AW explained that the reason for refusal related to the failure to demonstrate that the scheme would meet the 40% reduction in Co2 emissions as required by the London Plan. JB explained that the scheme demonstrated a 37% reduction at present. AW confirmed that where proposals were not policy compliant (i.e. in this case meeting the 40% target), additional justification would be required. AW explained that the previous Energy Statement lacked justification, and that Council would only agree to the proposal for off-site contribution where on-site provision (i.e. renewables) have been justified as unfeasible.

- JB confirmed that this would be addressed through a revised Energy Statement.

7. Reason 7 - Contributions

- JB and DH noted the reason for refusal in respect of contributions.

- AW noted that LB Hillingdon has now adopted their CIL and that the development would be applicable.

- MM queried whether, in light of CIL, would any further S106 contributions be sought on a site specific basis. AW confirmed that it was likely the council would seek contributions towards off-site landscaping, highways works and potentially air quality.

8. Next Steps

- It was agreed that minutes of the meeting would be prepared and circulated with officers for agreement to agree the scope of works required to support a revised submission.

APPENDIX B TRICS Trip Rates and Trips Calculations Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip Weekday Assessment

1. Planning Baseline Position

Table 1: TRICS Sui Generis - Car Showroom (Weekday) - 2,150 sqm Table 2: TRICS Open A1 - Food Superstore (Weekday) - 1,915 sqm ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS Parking ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS Parking Accumulation Time Range Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Accumulation Time Range Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles 00:00-01:00 00:00-01:00 01:00-02:00 01:00-02:00 02:00-03:00 02:00-03:00 03:00-04:00 03:00-04:00 04:00-05:00 04:00-05:00 05:00-06:00 14 05:00-06:00 0 0 0 0 06:00-07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 06:00-07:00 1.037 20 0.356 7 1.393 27 13 07:00-08:00 0.388 8 0.071 2 0.459 10 20 07:00-08:00 2.101 40 1.239 24 3.34 64 29 08:00-09:00 0.818 18 0.387 8 1.205 26 30 08:00-09:00 4.14 79 2.719 52 6.859 131 56 09:00-10:00 0.636 14 0.478 10 1.114 24 34 09:00-10:00 5.894 113 4.46 85 10.354 198 84 10:00-11:00 0.566 12 0.531 11 1.097 23 35 10:00-11:00 7.05 135 6.163 118 13.213 253 101 11:00-12:00 0.503 11 0.515 11 1.018 22 35 11:00-12:00 7.423 142 7.037 135 14.46 277 108 12:00-13:00 0.538 12 0.522 11 1.06 23 36 12:00-13:00 7.415 142 7.672 147 15.087 289 103 13:00-14:00 0.527 11 0.527 11 1.054 22 36 13:00-14:00 7.601 146 7.929 152 15.53 298 97 14:00-15:00 0.51 11 0.582 13 1.092 24 34 14:00-15:00 7.634 146 7.924 152 15.558 298 91 15:00-16:00 0.506 11 0.569 12 1.075 23 33 15:00-16:00 7.154 137 7.241 139 14.395 276 89 16:00-17:00 0.405 9 0.566 12 0.971 21 30 16:00-17:00 6.992 134 7.315 140 14.307 274 83 17:00-18:00 0.312 7 0.499 11 0.811 18 26 17:00-18:00 7.618 146 7.92 152 15.538 298 77 18:00-19:00 0.081 2 0.378 8 0.459 10 20 18:00-19:00 6.677 128 7.543 144 14.22 272 61 19:00-20:00 0.037 1 0.32 7 0.357 8 14 19:00-20:00 5.182 99 6.249 120 11.431 219 40 20:00-21:00 0.116 2 0.194 4 0.31 6 12 20:00-21:00 4.095 78 4.631 89 8.726 167 29 21:00-22:00 0 0 0.542 12 0.542 12 0 21:00-22:00 2.27 43 3.204 61 5.474 104 11 22:00-23:00 0 22:00-23:00 0.356 7 0.635 12 0.991 19 6 23:00-24:00 23:00-24:00 0 0 0 6 Daily Trip Rates: 5.943 129 6.681 143 12.624 272 Daily Trip Rates: 90.639 1736 90.237 1728 180.876 3464 Note: This table represents the weekday baseline for the lawful permitted use of the site.

2. Proposed Lidl/Retail Unit Planning Application (based on GVA net sales floor area increase)

Table 3: TRICS Sui Generis - Car Showroom (Weekday) Table 4: TRICS Non-Food Retail Unit - (943sqm Net Increase) Weekday Net Total Increase (NFR - ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS Existing SG Use) Time Range Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Time Range Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Parking Accumulation 00:00-01:00 00:00-01:00 ARR TOTAL DEP TOTAL 01:00-02:00 01:00-02:00 02:00-03:00 02:00-03:00 03:00-04:00 03:00-04:00 04:00-05:00 04:00-05:00 05:00-06:00 05:00-06:00 06:00-07:00 0 0 0 06:00-07:00 07:00-08:00 -8 -2 -10 07:00-08:00 0.12 1 0 0 0.12 1 1 -7 -2 08:00-09:00 -18 -8 -26 08:00-09:00 0.486 5 0.257 2 0.743 7 4 -13 -6 09:00-10:00 -14 -10 -24 09:00-10:00 2.377 22 1.513 14 3.89 36 12 8 4 10:00-11:00 -12 -11 -23 10:00-11:00 3.039 29 2.58 24 5.619 53 17 17 13 11:00-12:00 -11 -11 -22 11:00-12:00 3.431 32 3.174 30 6.605 62 19 21 19 12:00-13:00 -12 -11 -23 12:00-13:00 3.012 28 3.093 29 6.105 57 18 16 18 13:00-14:00 -11 -11 -22 13:00-14:00 3.458 33 3.255 31 6.713 64 20 22 20 14:00-15:00 -11 -13 -24 14:00-15:00 3.079 29 3.201 30 6.28 59 19 18 17 15:00-16:00 -11 -12 -23 15:00-16:00 2.458 23 2.89 27 5.348 50 15 12 15 16:00-17:00 -9 -12 -21 16:00-17:00 1.81 17 2.066 19 3.876 36 13 8 7 17:00-18:00 -7 -11 -18 17:00-18:00 1.864 18 1.958 18 3.822 36 13 11 7 18:00-19:00 -2 -8 -10 18:00-19:00 0.702 7 1.013 10 1.715 17 10 5 2 19:00-20:00 -1 -7 -8 19:00-20:00 0.203 2 0.581 5 0.784 7 7 1 -2 20:00-21:00 -2 -4 -6 20:00-21:00 0 0 0.136 1 0.136 1 6 -2 -3 21:00-22:00 0 -12 -12 21:00-22:00 0 0 0 6 0 -12 22:00-23:00 0 0 0 22:00-23:00 0 0 0 0 0 23:00-24:00 0 0 0 23:00-24:00 0 0 0 0 0 Daily Trip Rates: -129 -143 -272 Daily Trip Rates: 26.039 246 25.717 243 51.756 489 117 100 Note: All Sui Generis uses are being removed from the site. Note: NFR Represents the net increase of vehicle movements for the site in this scenario

3. LBH Requested Assessment

Table 5: TRICS Non-Food Retail Units (1,572 sqm) - Weekday Table 6: Lidl - A1 Food Superstore TRICS Trip Rates - 1,286 sqm Net Total NFR + Lidl for LBH Comparison with 1915sqm ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS Parking ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS Assessment Baseline Position Time Range Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Accumulation Time Range Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Parking Accumulation 00:00-01:00 00:00-01:00 ARR TOTAL DEP TOTAL ARR TOTAL DEP TOTAL 01:00-02:00 01:00-02:00 02:00-03:00 02:00-03:00 03:00-04:00 03:00-04:00 04:00-05:00 04:00-05:00 05:00-06:00 05:00-06:00 06:00-07:00 1 06:00-07:00 1.037 13 0.356 5 1.393 18 8 13 5 -7 -2 07:00-08:00 0.12 0 0 0 0.12 0 1 07:00-08:00 2.101 27 1.239 16 3.34 43 19 27 16 -13 -8 08:00-09:00 0.486 8 0.257 4 0.743 12 5 08:00-09:00 4.14 53 2.719 35 6.859 88 37 61 39 -18 -13 09:00-10:00 2.377 37 1.513 24 3.89 61 18 09:00-10:00 5.894 76 4.46 57 10.354 133 56 113 81 0 -4 10:00-11:00 3.039 48 2.58 41 5.619 89 25 10:00-11:00 7.05 91 6.163 79 13.213 170 68 139 120 4 2 11:00-12:00 3.431 54 3.174 50 6.605 104 29 11:00-12:00 7.423 95 7.037 90 14.46 185 73 149 140 7 5 12:00-13:00 3.012 47 3.093 49 6.105 96 27 12:00-13:00 7.415 95 7.672 99 15.087 194 69 142 148 0 1 13:00-14:00 3.458 54 3.255 51 6.713 105 30 13:00-14:00 7.601 98 7.929 102 15.53 200 65 152 153 6 1 14:00-15:00 3.079 48 3.201 50 6.28 98 28 14:00-15:00 7.634 98 7.924 102 15.558 200 61 146 152 0 0 15:00-16:00 2.458 39 2.89 45 5.348 84 22 15:00-16:00 7.154 92 7.241 93 14.395 185 60 131 138 -6 -1 16:00-17:00 1.81 28 2.066 32 3.876 60 18 16:00-17:00 6.992 90 7.315 94 14.307 184 56 118 126 -16 -14 17:00-18:00 1.864 29 1.958 31 3.822 60 16 17:00-18:00 7.618 98 7.92 102 15.538 200 52 127 133 -19 -19 18:00-19:00 0.702 11 1.013 16 1.715 27 11 18:00-19:00 6.677 86 7.543 97 14.22 183 41 97 113 -31 -31 19:00-20:00 0.203 3 0.581 9 0.784 12 5 19:00-20:00 5.182 67 6.249 80 11.431 147 28 70 89 -29 -31 20:00-21:00 0 0 0.136 2 0.136 2 3 20:00-21:00 4.095 53 4.631 60 8.726 113 21 53 62 -25 -27 21:00-22:00 0 0 0 3 21:00-22:00 2.27 29 3.204 41 5.474 70 9 29 41 -14 -20 22:00-23:00 0 0 0 3 22:00-23:00 0.356 5 0.635 8 0.991 13 6 5 8 -2 -4 23:00-24:00 0 0 0 3 23:00-24:00 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 Daily Trip Rates: 26.039 409 25.717 404 51.756 813 Daily Trip Rates: 90.639 1166 90.237 1160 180.876 2326 1575 1564 -161 -164 Note: NFR Area represent 943sqm net increase + 349 remaining Coment unit + 280 Bensons Mezzanine Imperial House, Victoria Road, South Ruislip Saturday Assessment

1. Planning Baseline Position

Table 7: TRICS Sui Generis - Car Showroom (Weekend) - 2,150 sqm Table 8: TRICS Open A1 - Food Superstore (Weekend) - 1,915 sqm ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS Parking ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS Time Range Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Accumulation Time Range Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Parking Accumulation 00:00-01:00 00:00-01:00 01:00-02:00 01:00-02:00 02:00-03:00 02:00-03:00 03:00-04:00 03:00-04:00 04:00-05:00 04:00-05:00 05:00-06:00 1 05:00-06:00 0 0 0 0 06:00-07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 06:00-07:00 1.242 24 0.162 3 1.404 27 21 07:00-08:00 0.435 9 0.435 9 0.87 19 1 07:00-08:00 1.754 34 1.078 21 2.832 55 34 08:00-09:00 0.46 10 0.115 2 0.575 12 9 08:00-09:00 4.184 80 2.676 51 6.86 131 63 09:00-10:00 0.23 5 0.153 3 0.383 8 11 09:00-10:00 6.425 123 4.661 89 11.086 212 97 10:00-11:00 0.268 6 0.23 5 0.498 11 12 10:00-11:00 8.198 157 7.271 139 15.469 296 115 11:00-12:00 0.345 7 0.421 9 0.766 16 10 11:00-12:00 9.238 177 8.841 169 18.079 346 123 12:00-13:00 0.307 7 0.46 10 0.767 16 7 12:00-13:00 8.775 168 9.077 174 17.852 342 117 13:00-14:00 0.383 8 0.536 12 0.919 20 3 13:00-14:00 8.429 161 8.6 165 17.029 326 113 14:00-15:00 0.651 14 0.498 11 1.149 25 6 14:00-15:00 8.132 156 8.259 158 16.391 314 111 15:00-16:00 0.115 2 0.192 4 0.307 7 4 15:00-16:00 8.831 169 8.827 169 17.658 338 111 16:00-17:00 0.268 6 0.345 7 0.613 13 3 16:00-17:00 8.491 163 9.276 178 17.767 341 96 17:00-18:00 0.038 1 0.192 4 0.23 5 0 17:00-18:00 7.971 153 8.647 166 16.618 319 83 18:00-19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00-19:00 6.118 117 7.654 147 13.772 264 53 19:00-20:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:00-20:00 3.361 64 4.401 84 7.762 148 33 20:00-21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:00-21:00 1.792 34 2.317 44 4.109 78 23 21:00-22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:00-22:00 1.172 22 1.747 33 2.919 55 12 22:00-23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:00-23:00 0.018 0 0.164 3 0.182 3 9 23:00-24:00 23:00-24:00 0 0 0 9 Daily Trip Rates: 3.5 75 3.577 77 7.077 152 Daily Trip Rates: 94.131 1803 93.658 1794 187.789 3597 Note: This table represents the Saturday baseline for the lawful permitted use of the site.

2. Proposed Lidl/Retail Unit Planning Application (based on GVA net sales floor area increase)

Table 9: TRICS Sui Generis - Car Showroom (Weekend) Table 10: TRICS Non-Food Retail Unit - (943sqm Net Increase) Weekend Net Total Increase (NFR - ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS Existing SG Use) Time Range Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Time Range Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Parking Accumulation 00:00-01:00 00:00-01:00 ARR TOTAL DEP TOTAL 01:00-02:00 01:00-02:00 02:00-03:00 02:00-03:00 03:00-04:00 03:00-04:00 04:00-05:00 04:00-05:00 05:00-06:00 05:00-06:00 0 0 06:00-07:00 0 0 0 06:00-07:00 0 0 07:00-08:00 -9 -9 -19 07:00-08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -9 -9 08:00-09:00 -10 -2 -12 08:00-09:00 0.418 5 0.062 1 0.48 6 5 -5 -1 09:00-10:00 -5 -3 -8 09:00-10:00 1.788 12 0.975 7 2.763 19 10 7 4 10:00-11:00 -6 -5 -11 10:00-11:00 2.886 24 2.298 17 5.184 41 17 18 12 11:00-12:00 -7 -9 -16 11:00-12:00 3.962 31 3.18 28 7.142 59 20 24 19 12:00-13:00 -7 -10 -16 12:00-13:00 4.279 33 3.985 28 8.264 61 25 26 18 13:00-14:00 -8 -12 -20 13:00-14:00 3.784 27 3.761 34 7.545 61 18 19 22 14:00-15:00 -14 -11 -25 14:00-15:00 4.945 37 4.612 37 9.557 74 18 23 26 15:00-16:00 -2 -4 -7 15:00-16:00 3.954 32 4.388 26 8.342 58 24 30 22 16:00-17:00 -6 -7 -13 16:00-17:00 3.08 28 3.614 32 6.694 60 20 22 25 17:00-18:00 -1 -4 -5 17:00-18:00 1.478 14 2.971 27 4.449 41 7 13 23 18:00-19:00 0 0 0 18:00-19:00 0.302 0 1.037 7 1.339 7 0 0 7 19:00-20:00 0 0 0 19:00-20:00 0 0 0.031 0 0.031 0 0 0 0 20:00-21:00 0 0 0 20:00-21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:00-22:00 0 0 0 21:00-22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:00-23:00 0 0 0 22:00-23:00 0 0 0 0 0 23:00-24:00 0 0 0 23:00-24:00 0 0 0 0 0 Daily Trip Rates: -75 -77 -152 Daily Trip Rates: 26.039 243 25.717 243 51.756 486 168 166 Note: All Sui Generis uses are being removed from the site. Note: NFR Represents the net increase of vehicle movements for the site in this scenario

3. LBH Requested Assessment

Table 11: TRICS Non-Food Retail Units (1572 sqm) - Weekend Table 12: Lidl - A1 Food Superstore TRICS Trip Rates - 1,286 sqm Net Total NFR + Lidl for LBH Comparison with 1915sqm ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS Parking ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS Assessment Baseline Position Time Range Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Accumulation Time Range Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Trip Rate Vehicles Parking Accumulation 00:00-01:00 00:00-01:00 ARR TOTAL DEP TOTAL ARR TOTAL DEP TOTAL 01:00-02:00 01:00-02:00 02:00-03:00 02:00-03:00 03:00-04:00 03:00-04:00 04:00-05:00 04:00-05:00 05:00-06:00 05:00-06:00 0 0 0 0 06:00-07:00 1 06:00-07:00 1.242 16 0.162 2 1.404 18 14 16 2 -8 -1 07:00-08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 07:00-08:00 1.754 23 1.078 14 2.832 37 23 23 14 -11 -7 08:00-09:00 0.418 9 0.062 2 0.48 11 8 08:00-09:00 4.184 54 2.676 34 6.86 88 43 63 36 -17 -15 09:00-10:00 1.788 19 0.975 11 2.763 30 16 09:00-10:00 6.425 83 4.661 60 11.086 143 66 102 71 -21 -18 10:00-11:00 2.886 40 2.298 29 5.184 69 27 10:00-11:00 8.198 105 7.271 94 15.469 199 77 145 123 -12 -16 11:00-12:00 3.962 52 3.18 47 7.142 99 32 11:00-12:00 9.238 119 8.841 114 18.079 233 82 171 161 -6 -8 12:00-13:00 4.279 55 3.985 46 8.264 101 41 12:00-13:00 8.775 113 9.077 117 17.852 230 78 168 163 0 -11 13:00-14:00 3.784 45 3.761 56 7.545 101 30 13:00-14:00 8.429 108 8.6 111 17.029 219 75 153 167 -8 2 14:00-15:00 4.945 61 4.612 61 9.557 122 30 14:00-15:00 8.132 105 8.259 106 16.391 211 74 166 167 10 9 15:00-16:00 3.954 54 4.388 43 8.342 97 41 15:00-16:00 8.831 114 8.827 114 17.658 228 74 168 157 -1 -12 16:00-17:00 3.08 47 3.614 54 6.694 101 34 16:00-17:00 8.491 109 9.276 119 17.767 228 64 156 173 -7 -5 17:00-18:00 1.478 23 2.971 45 4.449 68 12 17:00-18:00 7.971 103 8.647 111 16.618 214 56 126 156 -27 -10 18:00-19:00 0.302 0 1.037 11 1.339 11 1 18:00-19:00 6.118 79 7.654 98 13.772 177 37 79 109 -38 -38 19:00-20:00 0 0 0.031 1 0.031 1 0 19:00-20:00 3.361 43 4.401 57 7.762 100 23 43 58 -21 -26 20:00-21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:00-21:00 1.792 23 2.317 30 4.109 53 16 23 30 -11 -14 21:00-22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:00-22:00 1.172 15 1.747 22 2.919 37 9 15 22 -7 -11 22:00-23:00 0 0 0 0 22:00-23:00 0.018 0 0.164 2 0.182 2 7 0 2 0 -1 23:00-24:00 0 0 0 0 23:00-24:00 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 Daily Trip Rates: 26.039 404 25.717 405 51.756 809 Daily Trip Rates: 94.131 1211 93.658 1204 187.789 2415 1615 1609 -188 -185 Note: NFR Area represent 943sqm net increase + 349 remaining Coment unit + 280 Bensons Mezzanine

APPENDIX C TRICS Outputs – Food Superstore TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekday Assessment Page 1 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

Calculation Reference: AUDIT-750001-150427-0444 TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 01 - RETAIL Category : A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 01 GREATER LONDON CN CAMDEN 2 days KI KINGSTON 1 days 02 SOUTH EAST SC SURREY 1 days WN WINDSOR & MAIDENHEAD 1 days 03 SOUTH WEST DV DEVON 1 days 04 EAST ANGLIA CA CAMBRIDGESHIRE 1 days SF SUFFOLK 1 days 05 EAST MIDLANDS LE LEICESTERSHIRE 1 days 09 NORTH CB CUMBRIA 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Filtering Stage 2 selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Retail floor area Actual Range: 1000 to 5125 (units: sqm) Range Selected by User: 640 to 7000 (units: sqm)

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/07 to 29/11/14

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Monday 3 days Tuesday 1 days Thursday 1 days Friday 5 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 10 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

This data displays the number of manual classified surveys and the number of unclassified ATC surveys, the total adding up to the overall number of surveys in the selected set. Manual surveys are undertaken using staff, whilst ATC surveys are undertaking using machines.

Selected Locations: Town Centre 6 Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 2 Edge of Town 1 Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) 1

This data displays the number of surveys per main location category within the selected set. The main location categories consist of Free Standing, Edge of Town, Suburban Area, Neighbourhood Centre, Edge of Town Centre, Town Centre and Not Known.

Selected Location Sub Categories: Commercial Zone 1 Residential Zone 3 Retail Zone 2 Built-Up Zone 1 High Street 2 No Sub Category 1 TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekday Assessment Page 2 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

Filtering Stage 3 selection:

Use Class: A 1 10 days

Population within 1 mile: 5,001 to 10,000 2 days 10,001 to 15,000 2 days 15,001 to 20,000 1 days 25,001 to 50,000 2 days 50,001 to 100,000 3 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 100,001 to 125,000 2 days 125,001 to 250,000 2 days 250,001 to 500,000 3 days 500,001 or More 3 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 0.6 to 1.0 4 days 1.1 to 1.5 5 days 1.6 to 2.0 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Petrol filling station: PFS is present at the site and is included in the count 0 days PFS is present at the site but is excluded from the count 0 days There is no PFS at the site 10 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that include petrol filling station activity, and the number of surveys that do not.

Travel Plan: Yes 2 days No 8 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place, and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekday Assessment Page 3 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 CA-01-A-01 SAINSBURY'S CAMBRIDGESHIRE SIDNEY STREET

CAMBRIDGE Town Centre High Street Total Retail floor area: 1 5 5 0 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 12/07/13 Survey Type: MANUAL 2 CB-01-A-07 SOMERFIELD CUMBRIA WIGTON ROAD NEWTOWN CARLISLE Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Retail floor area: 1 5 0 0 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 05/02/10 Survey Type: MANUAL 3 CN-01-A-03 SAINSBURYS CENTRAL CAMDEN TOTTENHAM COURT RD.

BLOOMSBURY Town Centre Built-Up Zone Total Retail floor area: 1 4 5 4 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 03/11/08 Survey Type: MANUAL 4 CN-01-A-04 SAINSBURYS CEN. CAMDEN KINGSWAY

HOLBORN Town Centre Commercial Zone Total Retail floor area: 1 0 0 0 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 21/06/10 Survey Type: MANUAL 5 DV-01-A-21 MORRISONS DEVON TORR LANE PENNYCROSS PLYMOUTH Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Retail floor area: 4 0 0 0 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 23/10/09 Survey Type: MANUAL 6 KI-01-A-01 SAINSBURY'S KINGSTON EDEN STREET EDEN WALK SHOP. CEN. KINGSTON UPON THAMES Town Centre Retail Zone Total Retail floor area: 1 4 0 0 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 14/06/10 Survey Type: MANUAL 7 LE-01-A-02 ASDA LEICESTERSHIRE LEICESTER ROAD OADBY LEICESTER Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) No Sub Category Total Retail floor area: 5 1 2 5 sqm Survey date: TUESDAY 23/06/09 Survey Type: MANUAL TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekday Assessment Page 4 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters (Cont.)

8 SC-01-A-08 SAINSBURY'S SURREY LONDON ROAD

REDHILL Town Centre Retail Zone Total Retail floor area: 2 7 5 5 sqm Survey date: THURSDAY 08/07/10 Survey Type: MANUAL 9 SF-01-A-02 SAINSBURY'S SUFFOLK UPPER BROOK STREET

IPSWICH Town Centre High Street Total Retail floor area: 1 6 4 0 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 19/07/13 Survey Type: MANUAL 10 WN-01-A-01 SAINSBURYS WINDSOR & MAIDENHEAD LAKE END ROAD LENT RISE SLOUGH Edge of Town Residential Zone Total Retail floor area: 3 7 0 4 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 07/10/11 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekday Assessment Page 5 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL VEHICLES Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 2 3230 1.037 2 3230 0.356 2 3230 1.393 07:00 - 08:00 10 2413 2.101 10 2413 1.239 10 2413 3.340 08:00 - 09:00 10 2413 4.140 10 2413 2.719 10 2413 6.859 09:00 - 10:00 10 2413 5.894 10 2413 4.460 10 2413 10.354 10:00 - 11:00 10 2413 7.050 10 2413 6.163 10 2413 13.213 11:00 - 12:00 10 2413 7.423 10 2413 7.037 10 2413 14.460 12:00 - 13:00 10 2413 7.415 10 2413 7.672 10 2413 15.087 13:00 - 14:00 10 2413 7.601 10 2413 7.929 10 2413 15.530 14:00 - 15:00 10 2413 7.634 10 2413 7.924 10 2413 15.558 15:00 - 16:00 10 2413 7.154 10 2413 7.241 10 2413 14.395 16:00 - 17:00 10 2413 6.992 10 2413 7.315 10 2413 14.307 17:00 - 18:00 10 2413 7.618 10 2413 7.920 10 2413 15.538 18:00 - 19:00 10 2413 6.677 10 2413 7.543 10 2413 14.220 19:00 - 20:00 9 2519 5.182 9 2519 6.249 9 2519 11.431 20:00 - 21:00 6 3106 4.095 6 3106 4.631 6 3106 8.726 21:00 - 22:00 6 3106 2.270 6 3106 3.204 6 3106 5.474 22:00 - 23:00 2 3230 0.356 2 3230 0.635 2 3230 0.991 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 9 0.639 9 0.237 180.876

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals (whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 1000 - 5125 (units: sqm) Survey date date range: 01/01/07 - 29/11/14 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 10 Number of Saturdays: 0 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys manually removed from selection: 0

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekday Assessment Page 6 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL TAXIS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 07:00 - 08:00 10 2413 0.017 10 2413 0.012 10 2413 0.029 08:00 - 09:00 10 2413 0.017 10 2413 0.021 10 2413 0.038 09:00 - 10:00 10 2413 0.046 10 2413 0.037 10 2413 0.083 10:00 - 11:00 10 2413 0.099 10 2413 0.091 10 2413 0.190 11:00 - 12:00 10 2413 0.166 10 2413 0.153 10 2413 0.319 12:00 - 13:00 10 2413 0.141 10 2413 0.112 10 2413 0.253 13:00 - 14:00 10 2413 0.087 10 2413 0.108 10 2413 0.195 14:00 - 15:00 10 2413 0.075 10 2413 0.095 10 2413 0.170 15:00 - 16:00 10 2413 0.108 10 2413 0.091 10 2413 0.199 16:00 - 17:00 10 2413 0.149 10 2413 0.145 10 2413 0.294 17:00 - 18:00 10 2413 0.104 10 2413 0.099 10 2413 0.203 18:00 - 19:00 10 2413 0.091 10 2413 0.128 10 2413 0.219 19:00 - 20:00 9 2519 0.066 9 2519 0.071 9 2519 0.137 20:00 - 21:00 6 3106 0.038 6 3106 0.038 6 3106 0.076 21:00 - 22:00 6 3106 0.032 6 3106 0.032 6 3106 0.064 22:00 - 23:00 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 1.236 1.233 2.469

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekday Assessment Page 7 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL OGVS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 2 3230 0.046 2 3230 0.031 2 3230 0.077 07:00 - 08:00 10 2413 0.029 10 2413 0.025 10 2413 0.054 08:00 - 09:00 10 2413 0.037 10 2413 0.046 10 2413 0.083 09:00 - 10:00 10 2413 0.029 10 2413 0.033 10 2413 0.062 10:00 - 11:00 10 2413 0.025 10 2413 0.021 10 2413 0.046 11:00 - 12:00 10 2413 0.012 10 2413 0.037 10 2413 0.049 12:00 - 13:00 10 2413 0.004 10 2413 0.004 10 2413 0.008 13:00 - 14:00 10 2413 0.012 10 2413 0.012 10 2413 0.024 14:00 - 15:00 10 2413 0.017 10 2413 0.012 10 2413 0.029 15:00 - 16:00 10 2413 0.012 10 2413 0.012 10 2413 0.024 16:00 - 17:00 10 2413 0.017 10 2413 0.021 10 2413 0.038 17:00 - 18:00 10 2413 0.008 10 2413 0.012 10 2413 0.020 18:00 - 19:00 10 2413 0.012 10 2413 0.008 10 2413 0.020 19:00 - 20:00 9 2519 0.013 9 2519 0.000 9 2519 0.013 20:00 - 21:00 6 3106 0.000 6 3106 0.016 6 3106 0.016 21:00 - 22:00 6 3106 0.000 6 3106 0.000 6 3106 0.000 22:00 - 23:00 2 3230 0.015 2 3230 0.015 2 3230 0.030 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.288 0.305 0.593

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekday Assessment Page 8 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL PSVS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 07:00 - 08:00 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 10 2413 0.004 10 2413 0.004 10 2413 0.008 10:00 - 11:00 10 2413 0.008 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.008 11:00 - 12:00 10 2413 0.004 10 2413 0.012 10 2413 0.016 12:00 - 13:00 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 13:00 - 14:00 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 14:00 - 15:00 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 15:00 - 16:00 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 16:00 - 17:00 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 10 2413 0.004 10 2413 0.004 10 2413 0.008 18:00 - 19:00 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 9 2519 0.000 9 2519 0.000 9 2519 0.000 20:00 - 21:00 6 3106 0.000 6 3106 0.000 6 3106 0.000 21:00 - 22:00 6 3106 0.000 6 3106 0.000 6 3106 0.000 22:00 - 23:00 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.020 0.020 0.040

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekday Assessment Page 9 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL CYCLISTS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 07:00 - 08:00 10 2413 0.170 10 2413 0.099 10 2413 0.269 08:00 - 09:00 10 2413 0.278 10 2413 0.224 10 2413 0.502 09:00 - 10:00 10 2413 0.344 10 2413 0.240 10 2413 0.584 10:00 - 11:00 10 2413 0.427 10 2413 0.377 10 2413 0.804 11:00 - 12:00 10 2413 0.352 10 2413 0.419 10 2413 0.771 12:00 - 13:00 10 2413 0.477 10 2413 0.493 10 2413 0.970 13:00 - 14:00 10 2413 0.605 10 2413 0.501 10 2413 1.106 14:00 - 15:00 10 2413 0.414 10 2413 0.489 10 2413 0.903 15:00 - 16:00 10 2413 0.485 10 2413 0.406 10 2413 0.891 16:00 - 17:00 10 2413 0.485 10 2413 0.489 10 2413 0.974 17:00 - 18:00 10 2413 0.501 10 2413 0.514 10 2413 1.015 18:00 - 19:00 10 2413 0.307 10 2413 0.485 10 2413 0.792 19:00 - 20:00 9 2519 0.176 9 2519 0.168 9 2519 0.344 20:00 - 21:00 6 3106 0.080 6 3106 0.102 6 3106 0.182 21:00 - 22:00 6 3106 0.027 6 3106 0.091 6 3106 0.118 22:00 - 23:00 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.015 2 3230 0.015 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 5.128 5.112 1 0.240

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekday Assessment Page 10 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL VEHICLE OCCUPANTS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 2 3230 1.177 2 3230 0.403 2 3230 1.580 07:00 - 08:00 10 2413 2.391 10 2413 1.393 10 2413 3.784 08:00 - 09:00 10 2413 5.011 10 2413 3.117 10 2413 8.128 09:00 - 10:00 10 2413 7.493 10 2413 5.562 10 2413 13.055 10:00 - 11:00 10 2413 9.334 10 2413 7.734 10 2413 17.068 11:00 - 12:00 10 2413 9.980 10 2413 9.392 10 2413 19.372 12:00 - 13:00 10 2413 9.864 10 2413 10.142 10 2413 20.006 13:00 - 14:00 10 2413 10.299 10 2413 10.482 10 2413 20.781 14:00 - 15:00 10 2413 10.208 10 2413 10.689 10 2413 20.897 15:00 - 16:00 10 2413 9.980 10 2413 10.258 10 2413 20.238 16:00 - 17:00 10 2413 9.644 10 2413 10.233 10 2413 19.877 17:00 - 18:00 10 2413 10.361 10 2413 10.776 10 2413 21.137 18:00 - 19:00 10 2413 9.603 10 2413 10.473 10 2413 20.076 19:00 - 20:00 9 2519 7.771 9 2519 9.187 9 2519 16.958 20:00 - 21:00 6 3106 6.037 6 3106 6.939 6 3106 12.976 21:00 - 22:00 6 3106 3.000 6 3106 4.685 6 3106 7.685 22:00 - 23:00 2 3230 0.480 2 3230 0.666 2 3230 1.146 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 122.633 122.131 244.764

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekday Assessment Page 11 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL PEDESTRIANS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 2 3230 0.046 2 3230 0.031 2 3230 0.077 07:00 - 08:00 10 2413 1.422 10 2413 2.760 10 2413 4.182 08:00 - 09:00 10 2413 3.195 10 2413 6.557 10 2413 9.752 09:00 - 10:00 10 2413 4.070 10 2413 6.250 10 2413 10.320 10:00 - 11:00 10 2413 5.355 10 2413 6.926 10 2413 12.281 11:00 - 12:00 10 2413 7.066 10 2413 8.049 10 2413 15.115 12:00 - 13:00 10 2413 13.706 10 2413 14.187 10 2413 27.893 13:00 - 14:00 10 2413 15.480 10 2413 15.741 10 2413 31.221 14:00 - 15:00 10 2413 9.188 10 2413 9.752 10 2413 18.940 15:00 - 16:00 10 2413 9.122 10 2413 7.887 10 2413 17.009 16:00 - 17:00 10 2413 9.085 10 2413 8.981 10 2413 18.066 17:00 - 18:00 10 2413 10.946 10 2413 7.958 10 2413 18.904 18:00 - 19:00 10 2413 9.499 10 2413 7.021 10 2413 16.520 19:00 - 20:00 9 2519 3.881 9 2519 3.586 9 2519 7.467 20:00 - 21:00 6 3106 0.977 6 3106 1.395 6 3106 2.372 21:00 - 22:00 6 3106 0.553 6 3106 0.655 6 3106 1.208 22:00 - 23:00 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.046 2 3230 0.046 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 103.591 107.782 211.373

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekday Assessment Page 12 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL BUS/TRAM PASSENGERS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 2 3230 0.046 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.046 07:00 - 08:00 10 2413 1.107 10 2413 0.522 10 2413 1.629 08:00 - 09:00 10 2413 1.770 10 2413 0.775 10 2413 2.545 09:00 - 10:00 10 2413 2.035 10 2413 0.974 10 2413 3.009 10:00 - 11:00 10 2413 2.624 10 2413 1.994 10 2413 4.618 11:00 - 12:00 10 2413 3.158 10 2413 2.495 10 2413 5.653 12:00 - 13:00 10 2413 3.291 10 2413 2.636 10 2413 5.927 13:00 - 14:00 10 2413 3.312 10 2413 2.773 10 2413 6.085 14:00 - 15:00 10 2413 2.491 10 2413 2.321 10 2413 4.812 15:00 - 16:00 10 2413 2.093 10 2413 2.495 10 2413 4.588 16:00 - 17:00 10 2413 1.952 10 2413 2.615 10 2413 4.567 17:00 - 18:00 10 2413 1.732 10 2413 2.868 10 2413 4.600 18:00 - 19:00 10 2413 1.716 10 2413 2.462 10 2413 4.178 19:00 - 20:00 9 2519 0.406 9 2519 0.931 9 2519 1.337 20:00 - 21:00 6 3106 0.177 6 3106 0.220 6 3106 0.397 21:00 - 22:00 6 3106 0.032 6 3106 0.059 6 3106 0.091 22:00 - 23:00 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 2 7.942 2 6.140 5 4.082

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekday Assessment Page 13 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL TOTAL RAIL PASSENGERS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 07:00 - 08:00 10 2413 1.475 10 2413 0.344 10 2413 1.819 08:00 - 09:00 10 2413 3.560 10 2413 0.634 10 2413 4.194 09:00 - 10:00 10 2413 2.176 10 2413 0.232 10 2413 2.408 10:00 - 11:00 10 2413 2.163 10 2413 0.531 10 2413 2.694 11:00 - 12:00 10 2413 1.824 10 2413 0.684 10 2413 2.508 12:00 - 13:00 10 2413 1.795 10 2413 1.169 10 2413 2.964 13:00 - 14:00 10 2413 2.545 10 2413 2.205 10 2413 4.750 14:00 - 15:00 10 2413 1.446 10 2413 0.982 10 2413 2.428 15:00 - 16:00 10 2413 0.825 10 2413 0.941 10 2413 1.766 16:00 - 17:00 10 2413 1.032 10 2413 2.097 10 2413 3.129 17:00 - 18:00 10 2413 0.912 10 2413 2.698 10 2413 3.610 18:00 - 19:00 10 2413 1.409 10 2413 2.740 10 2413 4.149 19:00 - 20:00 9 2519 0.260 9 2519 1.169 9 2519 1.429 20:00 - 21:00 6 3106 0.032 6 3106 0.027 6 3106 0.059 21:00 - 22:00 6 3106 0.005 6 3106 0.005 6 3106 0.010 22:00 - 23:00 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 2 1.459 1 6.458 3 7.917

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekday Assessment Page 14 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL COACH PASSENGERS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 07:00 - 08:00 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 10 2413 0.017 10 2413 0.017 10 2413 0.034 10:00 - 11:00 10 2413 0.066 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.066 11:00 - 12:00 10 2413 0.050 10 2413 0.116 10 2413 0.166 12:00 - 13:00 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 13:00 - 14:00 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 14:00 - 15:00 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 15:00 - 16:00 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 16:00 - 17:00 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 10 2413 0.008 10 2413 0.008 10 2413 0.016 18:00 - 19:00 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 10 2413 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 9 2519 0.000 9 2519 0.000 9 2519 0.000 20:00 - 21:00 6 3106 0.000 6 3106 0.000 6 3106 0.000 21:00 - 22:00 6 3106 0.000 6 3106 0.000 6 3106 0.000 22:00 - 23:00 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.141 0.141 0.282

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekday Assessment Page 15 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT USERS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 2 3230 0.046 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.046 07:00 - 08:00 10 2413 2.582 10 2413 0.866 10 2413 3.448 08:00 - 09:00 10 2413 5.330 10 2413 1.409 10 2413 6.739 09:00 - 10:00 10 2413 4.227 10 2413 1.223 10 2413 5.450 10:00 - 11:00 10 2413 4.853 10 2413 2.524 10 2413 7.377 11:00 - 12:00 10 2413 5.031 10 2413 3.295 10 2413 8.326 12:00 - 13:00 10 2413 5.085 10 2413 3.805 10 2413 8.890 13:00 - 14:00 10 2413 5.856 10 2413 4.978 10 2413 10.834 14:00 - 15:00 10 2413 3.937 10 2413 3.303 10 2413 7.240 15:00 - 16:00 10 2413 2.918 10 2413 3.436 10 2413 6.354 16:00 - 17:00 10 2413 2.984 10 2413 4.712 10 2413 7.696 17:00 - 18:00 10 2413 2.653 10 2413 5.574 10 2413 8.227 18:00 - 19:00 10 2413 3.125 10 2413 5.201 10 2413 8.326 19:00 - 20:00 9 2519 0.666 9 2519 2.099 9 2519 2.765 20:00 - 21:00 6 3106 0.209 6 3106 0.247 6 3106 0.456 21:00 - 22:00 6 3106 0.038 6 3106 0.064 6 3106 0.102 22:00 - 23:00 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 2 3230 0.000 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 4 9.540 4 2.736 9 2.276

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekday Assessment Page 16 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL TOTAL PEOPLE Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 2 3230 1.270 2 3230 0.434 2 3230 1.704 07:00 - 08:00 10 2413 6.565 10 2413 5.119 10 2413 11.684 08:00 - 09:00 10 2413 13.814 10 2413 11.306 10 2413 25.120 09:00 - 10:00 10 2413 16.135 10 2413 13.275 10 2413 29.410 10:00 - 11:00 10 2413 19.969 10 2413 17.561 10 2413 37.530 11:00 - 12:00 10 2413 22.430 10 2413 21.154 10 2413 43.584 12:00 - 13:00 10 2413 29.132 10 2413 28.626 10 2413 57.758 13:00 - 14:00 10 2413 32.241 10 2413 31.702 10 2413 63.943 14:00 - 15:00 10 2413 23.748 10 2413 24.233 10 2413 47.981 15:00 - 16:00 10 2413 22.505 10 2413 21.987 10 2413 44.492 16:00 - 17:00 10 2413 22.198 10 2413 24.416 10 2413 46.614 17:00 - 18:00 10 2413 24.461 10 2413 24.822 10 2413 49.283 18:00 - 19:00 10 2413 22.534 10 2413 23.181 10 2413 45.715 19:00 - 20:00 9 2519 12.494 9 2519 15.039 9 2519 27.533 20:00 - 21:00 6 3106 7.304 6 3106 8.683 6 3106 15.987 21:00 - 22:00 6 3106 3.617 6 3106 5.495 6 3106 9.112 22:00 - 23:00 2 3230 0.480 2 3230 0.728 2 3230 1.208 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 280.897 277.761 558.658

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekend Page 1 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

Calculation Reference: AUDIT-750001-150427-0449 TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 01 - RETAIL Category : A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 01 GREATER LONDON HD HILLINGDON 1 days 02 SOUTH EAST ES EAST SUSSEX 2 days WN WINDSOR & MAIDENHEAD 1 days 03 SOUTH WEST GS GLOUCESTERSHIRE 1 days 04 EAST ANGLIA NF NORFOLK 1 days 07 YORKSHIRE & NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE NY NORTH YORKSHIRE 1 days 09 NORTH DH DURHAM 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Filtering Stage 2 selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Retail floor area Actual Range: 640 to 3704 (units: sqm) Range Selected by User: 640 to 7000 (units: sqm)

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/07 to 29/11/14

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Saturday 8 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 8 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

Selected Locations: Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 5 Edge of Town 2 Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) 1

Selected Location Sub Categories: Development Zone 1 Residential Zone 3 Retail Zone 1 Built-Up Zone 1 No Sub Category 2 TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekend Page 2 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

Filtering Stage 3 selection:

Use Class: A 1 8 days

Population within 1 mile: 1,001 to 5,000 1 days 5,001 to 10,000 1 days 10,001 to 15,000 1 days 20,001 to 25,000 1 days 25,001 to 50,000 2 days 50,001 to 100,000 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 25,001 to 50,000 1 days 75,001 to 100,000 1 days 100,001 to 125,000 2 days 125,001 to 250,000 2 days 250,001 to 500,000 1 days 500,001 or More 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 0.6 to 1.0 2 days 1.1 to 1.5 4 days 1.6 to 2.0 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Petrol filling station: PFS is present at the site and is included in the count 0 days PFS is present at the site but is excluded from the count 0 days There is no PFS at the site 8 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that include petrol filling station activity, and the number of surveys that do not.

Travel Plan: Not Known 1 days Yes 2 days No 5 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place, and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekend Page 3 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 DH-01-A-02 SAINSBURYS DURHAM SUNDERLAND ROAD GILESGATE DURHAM Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Retail floor area: 6 4 0 sqm Survey date: SATURDAY 25/10/08 Survey Type: MANUAL 2 ES-01-A-15 SAINSBURYS EAST SUSSEX LEWES ROAD

BRIGHTON Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) No Sub Category Total Retail floor area: 2 3 2 5 sqm Survey date: SATURDAY 24/11/07 Survey Type: MANUAL 3 ES-01-A-17 ASDA EAST SUSSEX BATTLE ROAD ST LEONARDS ON SEA HASTINGS Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Retail Zone Total Retail floor area: 3 5 7 0 sqm Survey date: SATURDAY 01/03/14 Survey Type: MANUAL 4 GS-01-A-04 SAINSBURYS GLOUCESTERSHIRE PRIORS ROAD

C H E L T E N H A M Edge of Town Residential Zone Total Retail floor area: 2 5 0 0 sqm Survey date: SATURDAY 24/04/10 Survey Type: MANUAL 5 HD-01-A-01 ORIENTAL SUPERMARKET HILLINGDON UXBRIDGE ROAD

HAYES Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) Development Zone Total Retail floor area: 3 4 0 8 sqm Survey date: SATURDAY 29/11/14 Survey Type: MANUAL 6 NF-01-A-04 SAINSBURYS NORFOLK QUEENS ROAD

NORWICH Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Built-Up Zone Total Retail floor area: 3 2 0 5 sqm Survey date: SATURDAY 19/05/07 Survey Type: MANUAL 7 NY-01-A-05 SAINSBURY'S NORTH YORKSHIRE HIGH STREET

NORTHALLERTON Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) No Sub Category Total Retail floor area: 1 8 0 0 sqm Survey date: SATURDAY 26/09/09 Survey Type: MANUAL TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekend Page 4 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters (Cont.)

8 WN-01-A-01 SAINSBURYS WINDSOR & MAIDENHEAD LAKE END ROAD LENT RISE SLOUGH Edge of Town Residential Zone Total Retail floor area: 3 7 0 4 sqm Survey date: SATURDAY 08/10/11 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekend Page 5 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL VEHICLES Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 1 3704 1.242 1 3704 0.162 1 3704 1.404 07:00 - 08:00 8 2644 1.754 8 2644 1.078 8 2644 2.832 08:00 - 09:00 8 2644 4.184 8 2644 2.676 8 2644 6.860 09:00 - 10:00 8 2644 6.425 8 2644 4.661 8 2644 11.086 10:00 - 11:00 8 2644 8.198 8 2644 7.271 8 2644 15.469 11:00 - 12:00 8 2644 9.238 8 2644 8.841 8 2644 18.079 12:00 - 13:00 8 2644 8.775 8 2644 9.077 8 2644 17.852 13:00 - 14:00 8 2644 8.429 8 2644 8.600 8 2644 17.029 14:00 - 15:00 8 2644 8.132 8 2644 8.259 8 2644 16.391 15:00 - 16:00 8 2644 8.831 8 2644 8.827 8 2644 17.658 16:00 - 17:00 8 2644 8.491 8 2644 9.276 8 2644 17.767 17:00 - 18:00 8 2644 7.971 8 2644 8.647 8 2644 16.618 18:00 - 19:00 8 2644 6.118 8 2644 7.654 8 2644 13.772 19:00 - 20:00 8 2644 3.361 8 2644 4.401 8 2644 7.762 20:00 - 21:00 8 2644 1.792 8 2644 2.317 8 2644 4.109 21:00 - 22:00 7 2535 1.172 7 2535 1.747 7 2535 2.919 22:00 - 23:00 2 2752 0.018 2 2752 0.164 2 2752 0.182 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 9 4.131 9 3.658 187.789

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 640 - 3704 (units: sqm) Survey date date range: 01/01/07 - 29/11/14 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 0 Number of Saturdays: 8 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys manually removed from selection: 2

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekend Page 6 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL TAXIS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 1 3704 0.000 1 3704 0.000 1 3704 0.000 07:00 - 08:00 8 2644 0.066 8 2644 0.043 8 2644 0.109 08:00 - 09:00 8 2644 0.071 8 2644 0.071 8 2644 0.142 09:00 - 10:00 8 2644 0.104 8 2644 0.095 8 2644 0.199 10:00 - 11:00 8 2644 0.161 8 2644 0.161 8 2644 0.322 11:00 - 12:00 8 2644 0.180 8 2644 0.161 8 2644 0.341 12:00 - 13:00 8 2644 0.165 8 2644 0.199 8 2644 0.364 13:00 - 14:00 8 2644 0.194 8 2644 0.189 8 2644 0.383 14:00 - 15:00 8 2644 0.137 8 2644 0.142 8 2644 0.279 15:00 - 16:00 8 2644 0.180 8 2644 0.165 8 2644 0.345 16:00 - 17:00 8 2644 0.128 8 2644 0.147 8 2644 0.275 17:00 - 18:00 8 2644 0.113 8 2644 0.113 8 2644 0.226 18:00 - 19:00 8 2644 0.099 8 2644 0.123 8 2644 0.222 19:00 - 20:00 8 2644 0.052 8 2644 0.052 8 2644 0.104 20:00 - 21:00 8 2644 0.071 8 2644 0.071 8 2644 0.142 21:00 - 22:00 7 2535 0.039 7 2535 0.028 7 2535 0.067 22:00 - 23:00 2 2752 0.018 2 2752 0.018 2 2752 0.036 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 1.778 1.778 3.556

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekend Page 7 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL OGVS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 1 3704 0.000 1 3704 0.000 1 3704 0.000 07:00 - 08:00 8 2644 0.052 8 2644 0.043 8 2644 0.095 08:00 - 09:00 8 2644 0.019 8 2644 0.043 8 2644 0.062 09:00 - 10:00 8 2644 0.033 8 2644 0.024 8 2644 0.057 10:00 - 11:00 8 2644 0.028 8 2644 0.019 8 2644 0.047 11:00 - 12:00 8 2644 0.024 8 2644 0.028 8 2644 0.052 12:00 - 13:00 8 2644 0.019 8 2644 0.024 8 2644 0.043 13:00 - 14:00 8 2644 0.019 8 2644 0.024 8 2644 0.043 14:00 - 15:00 8 2644 0.019 8 2644 0.024 8 2644 0.043 15:00 - 16:00 8 2644 0.019 8 2644 0.009 8 2644 0.028 16:00 - 17:00 8 2644 0.009 8 2644 0.019 8 2644 0.028 17:00 - 18:00 8 2644 0.014 8 2644 0.024 8 2644 0.038 18:00 - 19:00 8 2644 0.009 8 2644 0.005 8 2644 0.014 19:00 - 20:00 8 2644 0.009 8 2644 0.005 8 2644 0.014 20:00 - 21:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.005 8 2644 0.005 21:00 - 22:00 7 2535 0.011 7 2535 0.011 7 2535 0.022 22:00 - 23:00 2 2752 0.000 2 2752 0.000 2 2752 0.000 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.284 0.307 0.591

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekend Page 8 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL PSVS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 1 3704 0.000 1 3704 0.000 1 3704 0.000 07:00 - 08:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 10:00 - 11:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 11:00 - 12:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 12:00 - 13:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 13:00 - 14:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 14:00 - 15:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 15:00 - 16:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 16:00 - 17:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 18:00 - 19:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 20:00 - 21:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 21:00 - 22:00 7 2535 0.000 7 2535 0.000 7 2535 0.000 22:00 - 23:00 2 2752 0.000 2 2752 0.000 2 2752 0.000 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.000 0.000 0.000

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekend Page 9 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL CYCLISTS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 1 3704 0.081 1 3704 0.000 1 3704 0.081 07:00 - 08:00 8 2644 0.113 8 2644 0.071 8 2644 0.184 08:00 - 09:00 8 2644 0.099 8 2644 0.090 8 2644 0.189 09:00 - 10:00 8 2644 0.099 8 2644 0.090 8 2644 0.189 10:00 - 11:00 8 2644 0.137 8 2644 0.123 8 2644 0.260 11:00 - 12:00 8 2644 0.142 8 2644 0.137 8 2644 0.279 12:00 - 13:00 8 2644 0.165 8 2644 0.180 8 2644 0.345 13:00 - 14:00 8 2644 0.165 8 2644 0.147 8 2644 0.312 14:00 - 15:00 8 2644 0.189 8 2644 0.156 8 2644 0.345 15:00 - 16:00 8 2644 0.165 8 2644 0.222 8 2644 0.387 16:00 - 17:00 8 2644 0.213 8 2644 0.222 8 2644 0.435 17:00 - 18:00 8 2644 0.161 8 2644 0.165 8 2644 0.326 18:00 - 19:00 8 2644 0.137 8 2644 0.170 8 2644 0.307 19:00 - 20:00 8 2644 0.099 8 2644 0.095 8 2644 0.194 20:00 - 21:00 8 2644 0.080 8 2644 0.095 8 2644 0.175 21:00 - 22:00 7 2535 0.051 7 2535 0.101 7 2535 0.152 22:00 - 23:00 2 2752 0.000 2 2752 0.000 2 2752 0.000 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 2.096 2.064 4.160

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekend Page 10 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL VEHICLE OCCUPANTS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 1 3704 1.242 1 3704 0.162 1 3704 1.404 07:00 - 08:00 8 2644 2.033 8 2644 1.328 8 2644 3.361 08:00 - 09:00 8 2644 5.460 8 2644 3.262 8 2644 8.722 09:00 - 10:00 8 2644 8.633 8 2644 6.222 8 2644 14.855 10:00 - 11:00 8 2644 12.070 8 2644 10.401 8 2644 22.471 11:00 - 12:00 8 2644 14.041 8 2644 12.977 8 2644 27.018 12:00 - 13:00 8 2644 13.639 8 2644 14.193 8 2644 27.832 13:00 - 14:00 8 2644 13.034 8 2644 13.337 8 2644 26.371 14:00 - 15:00 8 2644 13.011 8 2644 12.963 8 2644 25.974 15:00 - 16:00 8 2644 14.150 8 2644 14.093 8 2644 28.243 16:00 - 17:00 8 2644 13.124 8 2644 15.062 8 2644 28.186 17:00 - 18:00 8 2644 12.840 8 2644 13.753 8 2644 26.593 18:00 - 19:00 8 2644 9.503 8 2644 11.800 8 2644 21.303 19:00 - 20:00 8 2644 5.295 8 2644 7.167 8 2644 12.462 20:00 - 21:00 8 2644 2.808 8 2644 3.645 8 2644 6.453 21:00 - 22:00 7 2535 1.674 7 2535 2.457 7 2535 4.131 22:00 - 23:00 2 2752 0.018 2 2752 0.182 2 2752 0.200 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 142.575 143.004 285.579

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekend Page 11 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL PEDESTRIANS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 1 3704 0.081 1 3704 0.054 1 3704 0.135 07:00 - 08:00 8 2644 0.794 8 2644 0.340 8 2644 1.134 08:00 - 09:00 8 2644 1.896 8 2644 1.730 8 2644 3.626 09:00 - 10:00 8 2644 2.104 8 2644 2.104 8 2644 4.208 10:00 - 11:00 8 2644 2.648 8 2644 2.676 8 2644 5.324 11:00 - 12:00 8 2644 3.248 8 2644 3.049 8 2644 6.297 12:00 - 13:00 8 2644 3.948 8 2644 3.588 8 2644 7.536 13:00 - 14:00 8 2644 3.475 8 2644 3.886 8 2644 7.361 14:00 - 15:00 8 2644 3.877 8 2644 3.300 8 2644 7.177 15:00 - 16:00 8 2644 3.863 8 2644 3.602 8 2644 7.465 16:00 - 17:00 8 2644 3.655 8 2644 3.314 8 2644 6.969 17:00 - 18:00 8 2644 3.503 8 2644 3.820 8 2644 7.323 18:00 - 19:00 8 2644 2.756 8 2644 3.035 8 2644 5.791 19:00 - 20:00 8 2644 1.726 8 2644 1.815 8 2644 3.541 20:00 - 21:00 8 2644 1.286 8 2644 1.503 8 2644 2.789 21:00 - 22:00 7 2535 0.907 7 2535 1.189 7 2535 2.096 22:00 - 23:00 2 2752 0.000 2 2752 0.073 2 2752 0.073 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 3 9.767 3 9.078 7 8.845

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekend Page 12 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL BUS/TRAM PASSENGERS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 1 3704 0.000 1 3704 0.000 1 3704 0.000 07:00 - 08:00 8 2644 0.132 8 2644 0.014 8 2644 0.146 08:00 - 09:00 8 2644 0.411 8 2644 0.123 8 2644 0.534 09:00 - 10:00 8 2644 0.553 8 2644 0.378 8 2644 0.931 10:00 - 11:00 8 2644 0.856 8 2644 0.520 8 2644 1.376 11:00 - 12:00 8 2644 0.771 8 2644 0.567 8 2644 1.338 12:00 - 13:00 8 2644 0.912 8 2644 0.780 8 2644 1.692 13:00 - 14:00 8 2644 0.889 8 2644 0.808 8 2644 1.697 14:00 - 15:00 8 2644 0.667 8 2644 0.898 8 2644 1.565 15:00 - 16:00 8 2644 0.927 8 2644 0.998 8 2644 1.925 16:00 - 17:00 8 2644 0.827 8 2644 0.946 8 2644 1.773 17:00 - 18:00 8 2644 0.790 8 2644 0.827 8 2644 1.617 18:00 - 19:00 8 2644 0.610 8 2644 0.756 8 2644 1.366 19:00 - 20:00 8 2644 0.388 8 2644 0.511 8 2644 0.899 20:00 - 21:00 8 2644 0.184 8 2644 0.260 8 2644 0.444 21:00 - 22:00 7 2535 0.034 7 2535 0.130 7 2535 0.164 22:00 - 23:00 2 2752 0.000 2 2752 0.000 2 2752 0.000 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 8.951 8.516 1 7.467

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekend Page 13 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL TOTAL RAIL PASSENGERS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 1 3704 0.000 1 3704 0.000 1 3704 0.000 07:00 - 08:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 10:00 - 11:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.005 8 2644 0.005 11:00 - 12:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 12:00 - 13:00 8 2644 0.005 8 2644 0.005 8 2644 0.010 13:00 - 14:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 14:00 - 15:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 15:00 - 16:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.005 8 2644 0.005 16:00 - 17:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 18:00 - 19:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 20:00 - 21:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 21:00 - 22:00 7 2535 0.000 7 2535 0.000 7 2535 0.000 22:00 - 23:00 2 2752 0.000 2 2752 0.000 2 2752 0.000 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.005 0.015 0.020

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekend Page 14 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL COACH PASSENGERS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 1 3704 0.000 1 3704 0.000 1 3704 0.000 07:00 - 08:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 10:00 - 11:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 11:00 - 12:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 12:00 - 13:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 13:00 - 14:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 14:00 - 15:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 15:00 - 16:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 16:00 - 17:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 18:00 - 19:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 20:00 - 21:00 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 8 2644 0.000 21:00 - 22:00 7 2535 0.000 7 2535 0.000 7 2535 0.000 22:00 - 23:00 2 2752 0.000 2 2752 0.000 2 2752 0.000 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.000 0.000 0.000

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekend Page 15 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT USERS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 1 3704 0.000 1 3704 0.000 1 3704 0.000 07:00 - 08:00 8 2644 0.132 8 2644 0.014 8 2644 0.146 08:00 - 09:00 8 2644 0.411 8 2644 0.123 8 2644 0.534 09:00 - 10:00 8 2644 0.553 8 2644 0.378 8 2644 0.931 10:00 - 11:00 8 2644 0.856 8 2644 0.525 8 2644 1.381 11:00 - 12:00 8 2644 0.771 8 2644 0.567 8 2644 1.338 12:00 - 13:00 8 2644 0.917 8 2644 0.785 8 2644 1.702 13:00 - 14:00 8 2644 0.889 8 2644 0.808 8 2644 1.697 14:00 - 15:00 8 2644 0.667 8 2644 0.898 8 2644 1.565 15:00 - 16:00 8 2644 0.927 8 2644 1.002 8 2644 1.929 16:00 - 17:00 8 2644 0.827 8 2644 0.946 8 2644 1.773 17:00 - 18:00 8 2644 0.790 8 2644 0.827 8 2644 1.617 18:00 - 19:00 8 2644 0.610 8 2644 0.756 8 2644 1.366 19:00 - 20:00 8 2644 0.388 8 2644 0.511 8 2644 0.899 20:00 - 21:00 8 2644 0.184 8 2644 0.260 8 2644 0.444 21:00 - 22:00 7 2535 0.034 7 2535 0.130 7 2535 0.164 22:00 - 23:00 2 2752 0.000 2 2752 0.000 2 2752 0.000 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 8.956 8.530 1 7.486

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 A1 Food Superstore_Weekend Page 16 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/A - FOOD SUPERSTORE MULTI-MODAL TOTAL PEOPLE Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 1 3704 1.404 1 3704 0.216 1 3704 1.620 07:00 - 08:00 8 2644 3.073 8 2644 1.754 8 2644 4.827 08:00 - 09:00 8 2644 7.867 8 2644 5.205 8 2644 13.072 09:00 - 10:00 8 2644 11.389 8 2644 8.793 8 2644 20.182 10:00 - 11:00 8 2644 15.710 8 2644 13.724 8 2644 29.434 11:00 - 12:00 8 2644 18.202 8 2644 16.731 8 2644 34.933 12:00 - 13:00 8 2644 18.670 8 2644 18.745 8 2644 37.415 13:00 - 14:00 8 2644 17.563 8 2644 18.178 8 2644 35.741 14:00 - 15:00 8 2644 17.743 8 2644 17.318 8 2644 35.061 15:00 - 16:00 8 2644 19.105 8 2644 18.920 8 2644 38.025 16:00 - 17:00 8 2644 17.819 8 2644 19.544 8 2644 37.363 17:00 - 18:00 8 2644 17.294 8 2644 18.566 8 2644 35.860 18:00 - 19:00 8 2644 13.006 8 2644 15.762 8 2644 28.768 19:00 - 20:00 8 2644 7.508 8 2644 9.588 8 2644 17.096 20:00 - 21:00 8 2644 4.359 8 2644 5.503 8 2644 9.862 21:00 - 22:00 7 2535 2.666 7 2535 3.877 7 2535 6.543 22:00 - 23:00 2 2752 0.018 2 2752 0.254 2 2752 0.272 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 193.396 192.678 386.074

Parameter summary

APPENDIX D TRICS Outputs – Car Showroom TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 Car Showroom TRICS Output Page 1 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

Calculation Reference: AUDIT-750001-150427-0437 TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 14 - CAR SHOW ROOMS Category : A - CAR SHOW ROOMS VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 01 GREATER LONDON BM BROMLEY 1 days HO HOUNSLOW 1 days HV HAVERING 1 days 02 SOUTH EAST EX ESSEX 1 days KC KENT 1 days 03 SOUTH WEST DV DEVON 1 days 04 EAST ANGLIA CA CAMBRIDGESHIRE 2 days 05 EAST MIDLANDS LE LEICESTERSHIRE 1 days LN LINCOLNSHIRE 1 days NR NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 1 days 06 WEST MIDLANDS WM WEST MIDLANDS 1 days WO WORCESTERSHIRE 1 days 07 YORKSHIRE & NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE NY NORTH YORKSHIRE 1 days SY SOUTH YORKSHIRE 1 days WY WEST YORKSHIRE 1 days 08 NORTH WEST LC LANCASHIRE 1 days 09 NORTH CB CUMBRIA 1 days TW TYNE & WEAR 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 Car Showroom TRICS Output Page 2 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

Filtering Stage 2 selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Gross floor area Actual Range: 425 to 9800 (units: sqm) Range Selected by User: 230 to 9800 (units: sqm)

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/07 to 06/10/14

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Monday 5 days Tuesday 3 days Thursday 4 days Friday 7 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 19 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

Selected Locations: Edge of Town Centre 1 Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 11 Edge of Town 6 Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) 1

Selected Location Sub Categories: Industrial Zone 6 Commercial Zone 5 Residential Zone 4 Retail Zone 1 High Street 1 No Sub Category 2

Filtering Stage 3 selection:

Use Class: Sui Generis 18 days

This data displays the number of surveys per Use Class classification within the selected set. The Use Classes Order 2005 has been used for this purpose, which can be found within the Library module of TRICS®. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 Car Showroom TRICS Output Page 3 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

Filtering Stage 3 selection (Cont.):

Population within 1 mile: 1,001 to 5,000 2 days 5,001 to 10,000 4 days 10,001 to 15,000 2 days 15,001 to 20,000 1 days 20,001 to 25,000 3 days 25,001 to 50,000 6 days 50,001 to 100,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 25,001 to 50,000 3 days 75,001 to 100,000 2 days 100,001 to 125,000 1 days 125,001 to 250,000 7 days 250,001 to 500,000 2 days 500,001 or More 4 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 0.6 to 1.0 8 days 1.1 to 1.5 11 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Travel Plan: No 19 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place, and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 Car Showroom TRICS Output Page 4 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 BM-14-A-01 AUDI BROMLEY CROYDON ROAD

BECKENHAM Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 9 1 5 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 18/09/09 Survey Type: MANUAL 2 CA-14-A-03 FORD CAMBRIDGESHIRE STUKELEY MEADOWS

HUNTINGDON Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Commercial Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 6 0 8 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 21/10/11 Survey Type: MANUAL 3 CA-14-A-04 MERCEDES BENZ CAMBRIDGESHIRE BARNWELL ROAD

CAMBRIDGE Edge of Town Commercial Zone Total Gross floor area: 3 4 0 0 sqm Survey date: THURSDAY 11/10/12 Survey Type: MANUAL 4 CB-14-A-02 FORD/CITROEN CUMBRIA HAWESWATER ROAD

PENRITH Edge of Town Industrial Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 9 0 0 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 28/11/08 Survey Type: MANUAL 5 DV-14-A-02 VAUXHALL DEVON MARSH BARTON ROAD

EXETER Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Retail Zone Total Gross floor area: 6 6 2 3 sqm Survey date: THURSDAY 28/11/13 Survey Type: MANUAL 6 EX-14-A-01 FORD ESSEX 109 RAINSFORD ROAD

CHELMSFORD Edge of Town Centre Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 8 2 5 sqm Survey date: TUESDAY 15/10/13 Survey Type: MANUAL 7 HO-14-A-01 FIAT HOUNSLOW WHITTEN ROAD

HOUNSLOW Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 4 2 5 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 10/12/12 Survey Type: MANUAL 8 HV-14-A-01 KIA HAVERING HIGH ROAD CHADWELL HEATH ROMFORD Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) High Street Total Gross floor area: 8 4 5 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 06/10/14 Survey Type: MANUAL TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 Car Showroom TRICS Output Page 5 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters (Cont.)

9 KC-14-A-02 CAR SHOW ROOM KENT UPPER ELMERS END ROAD

EDEN PARK Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 2 9 0 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 09/03/07 Survey Type: MANUAL 10 LC-14-A-03 CAR SHOW ROOM LANCASHIRE FYLDE ROAD ASHTON-ON-RIBBLE PRESTON Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) No Sub Category Total Gross floor area: 2 4 0 0 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 16/11/09 Survey Type: MANUAL 11 LE-14-A-04 BMW & MINI LEICESTERSHIRE MERIDIAN EAST BRAUNSTONE LEICESTER Edge of Town Commercial Zone Total Gross floor area: 9 8 0 0 sqm Survey date: THURSDAY 25/06/09 Survey Type: MANUAL 12 LN-14-A-01 HONDA LINCOLNSHIRE TOLLEMACHE ROAD

GRANTHAM Edge of Town Commercial Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 3 5 0 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 15/11/10 Survey Type: MANUAL 13 NR-14-A-01 TOYOTA NORTHAMPTONSHIRE FERRIS ROW RIVERSIDE BUSINESS PARK NORTHAMPTON Edge of Town Commercial Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 1 0 0 sqm Survey date: TUESDAY 22/05/07 Survey Type: MANUAL 14 NY-14-A-04 LAND ROVER NORTH YORKSHIRE HUTTON BANK

RIPON Edge of Town Industrial Zone Total Gross floor area: 2 1 6 0 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 23/09/13 Survey Type: MANUAL 15 SY-14-A-01 HYUNDAI SOUTH YORKSHIRE MIDDLE BANK HYDE PARK DONCASTER Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Industrial Zone Total Gross floor area: 5 0 0 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 21/12/12 Survey Type: MANUAL 16 TW-14-A-02 RENAULT TYNE & WEAR STONEYGATE CLOSE

GATESHEAD Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Industrial Zone Total Gross floor area: 2 2 0 0 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 04/10/13 Survey Type: MANUAL TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 Car Showroom TRICS Output Page 6 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters (Cont.)

17 WM-14-A-04 VOLKSWAGEN WEST MIDLANDS LAWLEY MIDDLEWAY

B I R M I N G H A M Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Industrial Zone Total Gross floor area: 5 7 0 0 sqm Survey date: THURSDAY 25/10/12 Survey Type: MANUAL 18 WO-14-A-01 HONDA WORCESTERSHIRE BROMYARD ROAD HENWICK WORCESTER Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) No Sub Category Total Gross floor area: 6 5 5 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 23/05/14 Survey Type: MANUAL 19 WY-14-A-03 VOLKSWAGEN WEST YORKSHIRE ELLAND ROAD

L E E D S Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Industrial Zone Total Gross floor area: 3 3 2 4 sqm Survey date: TUESDAY 24/09/13 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 Car Showroom TRICS Output Page 7 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 14 - CAR SHOW ROOMS/A - CAR SHOW ROOMS VEHICLES Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 1 1290 0.000 1 1290 0.000 1 1290 0.000 07:00 - 08:00 12 2682 0.388 12 2682 0.071 12 2682 0.459 08:00 - 09:00 19 2259 0.818 19 2259 0.387 19 2259 1.205 09:00 - 10:00 19 2259 0.636 19 2259 0.478 19 2259 1.114 10:00 - 11:00 19 2259 0.566 19 2259 0.531 19 2259 1.097 11:00 - 12:00 19 2259 0.503 19 2259 0.515 19 2259 1.018 12:00 - 13:00 19 2259 0.538 19 2259 0.522 19 2259 1.060 13:00 - 14:00 19 2259 0.527 19 2259 0.527 19 2259 1.054 14:00 - 15:00 19 2259 0.510 19 2259 0.582 19 2259 1.092 15:00 - 16:00 19 2259 0.506 19 2259 0.569 19 2259 1.075 16:00 - 17:00 19 2259 0.405 19 2259 0.566 19 2259 0.971 17:00 - 18:00 19 2259 0.312 19 2259 0.499 19 2259 0.811 18:00 - 19:00 17 2383 0.081 17 2383 0.378 17 2383 0.459 19:00 - 20:00 6 1824 0.037 6 1824 0.320 6 1824 0.357 20:00 - 21:00 1 2582 0.116 1 2582 0.194 1 2582 0.310 21:00 - 22:00 1 2582 0.000 1 2582 0.542 1 2582 0.542 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 5.943 6.681 1 2.624

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 425 - 9800 (units: sqm) Survey date date range: 01/01/07 - 06/10/14 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 19 Number of Saturdays: 0 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys manually removed from selection: 1

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 28/04/15 Car Showroom TRICS Output - Weekend Page 1 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

Calculation Reference: AUDIT-750001-150428-0405 TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 14 - CAR SHOW ROOMS Category : A - CAR SHOW ROOMS VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 01 GREATER LONDON RB REDBRIDGE 1 days 04 EAST ANGLIA CA CAMBRIDGESHIRE 1 days 08 NORTH WEST LC LANCASHIRE 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Filtering Stage 2 selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Gross floor area Actual Range: 230 to 1900 (units: sqm) Range Selected by User: 230 to 9800 (units: sqm)

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/07 to 06/10/14

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Saturday 1 days Sunday 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 3 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

Selected Locations: Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 2 Edge of Town 1

Selected Location Sub Categories: Industrial Zone 1 Residential Zone 1 No Sub Category 1

This data displays the number of surveys per location sub-category within the selected set. The location sub-categories consist of Commercial Zone, Industrial Zone, Development Zone, Residential Zone, Retail Zone, Built-Up Zone, Village, Out of Town, High Street and No Sub Category. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 28/04/15 Car Showroom TRICS Output - Weekend Page 2 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

Filtering Stage 3 selection:

Use Class: Sui Generis 3 days

Population within 1 mile: 10,001 to 15,000 1 days 25,001 to 50,000 1 days 50,001 to 100,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 125,001 to 250,000 2 days 500,001 or More 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 0.6 to 1.0 2 days 1.1 to 1.5 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Travel Plan: No 3 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place, and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 28/04/15 Car Showroom TRICS Output - Weekend Page 3 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 CA-14-A-02 SKODA CAMBRIDGESHIRE FENGATE FENGATE PETERBOROUGH Edge of Town Industrial Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 9 0 0 sqm Survey date: SATURDAY 17/10/09 Survey Type: MANUAL 2 LC-14-A-04 SUZUKI LANCASHIRE 350 BLACKPOOL ROAD FULWOOD PRESTON Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) No Sub Category Total Gross floor area: 4 8 0 sqm Survey date: SUNDAY 26/09/10 Survey Type: MANUAL 3 RB-14-A-01 CAR SHOW ROOM REDBRIDGE ROMFORD ROAD

ILFORD Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 2 3 0 sqm Survey date: SUNDAY 24/11/13 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 28/04/15 Car Showroom TRICS Output - Weekend Page 4 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 14 - CAR SHOW ROOMS/A - CAR SHOW ROOMS VEHICLES Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 1 230 0.435 1 230 0.435 1 230 0.870 08:00 - 09:00 3 870 0.460 3 870 0.115 3 870 0.575 09:00 - 10:00 3 870 0.230 3 870 0.153 3 870 0.383 10:00 - 11:00 3 870 0.268 3 870 0.230 3 870 0.498 11:00 - 12:00 3 870 0.345 3 870 0.421 3 870 0.766 12:00 - 13:00 3 870 0.307 3 870 0.460 3 870 0.767 13:00 - 14:00 3 870 0.383 3 870 0.536 3 870 0.919 14:00 - 15:00 3 870 0.651 3 870 0.498 3 870 1.149 15:00 - 16:00 3 870 0.115 3 870 0.192 3 870 0.307 16:00 - 17:00 3 870 0.268 3 870 0.345 3 870 0.613 17:00 - 18:00 3 870 0.038 3 870 0.192 3 870 0.230 18:00 - 19:00 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 20:00 - 21:00 21:00 - 22:00 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 3.500 3.577 7.077

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 230 - 1900 (units: sqm) Survey date date range: 01/01/07 - 06/10/14 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 0 Number of Saturdays: 1 Number of Sundays: 2 Surveys manually removed from selection: 0

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 28/04/15 Car Showroom TRICS Output - Weekend Page 5 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 14 - CAR SHOW ROOMS/A - CAR SHOW ROOMS TAXIS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 10:00 - 11:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 11:00 - 12:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 12:00 - 13:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 13:00 - 14:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 14:00 - 15:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 15:00 - 16:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 16:00 - 17:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 18:00 - 19:00 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 20:00 - 21:00 21:00 - 22:00 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.000 0.000 0.000

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 28/04/15 Car Showroom TRICS Output - Weekend Page 6 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 14 - CAR SHOW ROOMS/A - CAR SHOW ROOMS OGVS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 10:00 - 11:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 11:00 - 12:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 12:00 - 13:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 13:00 - 14:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 14:00 - 15:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 15:00 - 16:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 16:00 - 17:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 18:00 - 19:00 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 20:00 - 21:00 21:00 - 22:00 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.000 0.000 0.000

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 28/04/15 Car Showroom TRICS Output - Weekend Page 7 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 14 - CAR SHOW ROOMS/A - CAR SHOW ROOMS PSVS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 10:00 - 11:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 11:00 - 12:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 12:00 - 13:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 13:00 - 14:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 14:00 - 15:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 15:00 - 16:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 16:00 - 17:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 18:00 - 19:00 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 20:00 - 21:00 21:00 - 22:00 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.000 0.000 0.000

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Tuesday 28/04/15 Car Showroom TRICS Output - Weekend Page 8 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 14 - CAR SHOW ROOMS/A - CAR SHOW ROOMS CYCLISTS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate Days GFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 10:00 - 11:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 11:00 - 12:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 12:00 - 13:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 13:00 - 14:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 14:00 - 15:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 15:00 - 16:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 16:00 - 17:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 3 870 0.000 18:00 - 19:00 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 1 230 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 20:00 - 21:00 21:00 - 22:00 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.000 0.000 0.000

Parameter summary

APPENDIX E TRICS Outputs – Non-food Retail TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 NFR_Weekday Page 1 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

Calculation Reference: AUDIT-750001-150427-0419 TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 01 - RETAIL Category : G - OTHER INDIVIDUAL NON-FOOD SUPERSTORE VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 06 WEST MIDLANDS HE HEREFORDSHIRE 1 days 07 YORKSHIRE & NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE NY NORTH YORKSHIRE 1 days SY SOUTH YORKSHIRE 1 days 09 NORTH CB CUMBRIA 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Filtering Stage 2 selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Retail floor area Actual Range: 504 to 3000 (units: sqm) Range Selected by User: 125 to 4500 (units: sqm)

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/07 to 17/10/11

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Monday 2 days Wednesday 1 days Friday 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 4 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

Selected Locations: Edge of Town Centre 1 Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 1 Edge of Town 2

Selected Location Sub Categories: Retail Zone 2 Built-Up Zone 1 No Sub Category 1

This data displays the number of surveys per location sub-category within the selected set. The location sub-categories consist of Commercial Zone, Industrial Zone, Development Zone, Residential Zone, Retail Zone, Built-Up Zone, Village, Out of Town, High Street and No Sub Category. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 NFR_Weekday Page 2 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

Filtering Stage 3 selection:

Use Class: A 1 4 days

Population within 1 mile: 5,001 to 10,000 1 days 10,001 to 15,000 1 days 15,001 to 20,000 1 days 20,001 to 25,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 50,001 to 75,000 1 days 125,001 to 250,000 3 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 0.6 to 1.0 2 days 1.1 to 1.5 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Petrol filling station: Included in the survey count 0 days Excluded from count or no filling station 4 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that include petrol filling station activity, and the number of surveys that do not.

Travel Plan: No 4 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place, and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 NFR_Weekday Page 3 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 CB-01-G-02 STAPLES CUMBRIA JAMES STREET

CARLISLE Edge of Town Centre Built-Up Zone Total Retail floor area: 2 0 0 0 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 05/02/10 Survey Type: MANUAL 2 HE-01-G-01 PETS AT HOME HEREFORDSHIRE COMMERCIAL ROAD

HEREFORD Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) No Sub Category Total Retail floor area: 5 0 4 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 17/10/11 Survey Type: MANUAL 3 NY-01-G-03 DUNELM MILL NORTH YORKSHIRE STIRLING ROAD CLIFTON MOOR YORK Edge of Town Retail Zone Total Retail floor area: 3 0 0 0 sqm Survey date: WEDNESDAY 16/09/09 Survey Type: MANUAL 4 SY-01-G-01 DUNELM MILL SOUTH YORKSHIRE WOMBWELL LANE BARNSLEY RETAIL PARK BARNSLEY Edge of Town Retail Zone Total Retail floor area: 1 9 0 0 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 21/06/10 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 NFR_Weekday Page 4 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/G - OTHER INDIVIDUAL NON-FOOD SUPERSTORE VEHICLES Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 2 1252 0.120 2 1252 0.000 2 1252 0.120 08:00 - 09:00 4 1851 0.486 4 1851 0.257 4 1851 0.743 09:00 - 10:00 4 1851 2.377 4 1851 1.513 4 1851 3.890 10:00 - 11:00 4 1851 3.039 4 1851 2.580 4 1851 5.619 11:00 - 12:00 4 1851 3.431 4 1851 3.174 4 1851 6.605 12:00 - 13:00 4 1851 3.012 4 1851 3.093 4 1851 6.105 13:00 - 14:00 4 1851 3.458 4 1851 3.255 4 1851 6.713 14:00 - 15:00 4 1851 3.079 4 1851 3.201 4 1851 6.280 15:00 - 16:00 4 1851 2.458 4 1851 2.890 4 1851 5.348 16:00 - 17:00 4 1851 1.810 4 1851 2.066 4 1851 3.876 17:00 - 18:00 4 1851 1.864 4 1851 1.958 4 1851 3.822 18:00 - 19:00 4 1851 0.702 4 1851 1.013 4 1851 1.715 19:00 - 20:00 4 1851 0.203 4 1851 0.581 4 1851 0.784 20:00 - 21:00 3 1468 0.000 3 1468 0.136 3 1468 0.136 21:00 - 22:00 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 2 6.039 2 5.717 5 1.756

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 504 - 3000 (units: sqm) Survey date date range: 01/01/07 - 17/10/11 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 4 Number of Saturdays: 0 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys manually removed from selection: 0

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 NFR_Weekday Page 5 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/G - OTHER INDIVIDUAL NON-FOOD SUPERSTORE TAXIS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 2 1252 0.000 2 1252 0.000 2 1252 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 10:00 - 11:00 4 1851 0.027 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.027 11:00 - 12:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.014 12:00 - 13:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 13:00 - 14:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 14:00 - 15:00 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.028 15:00 - 16:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 16:00 - 17:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.014 17:00 - 18:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 18:00 - 19:00 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.028 19:00 - 20:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 20:00 - 21:00 3 1468 0.000 3 1468 0.000 3 1468 0.000 21:00 - 22:00 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.055 0.056 0.111

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 NFR_Weekday Page 6 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/G - OTHER INDIVIDUAL NON-FOOD SUPERSTORE OGVS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 2 1252 0.000 2 1252 0.000 2 1252 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.028 10:00 - 11:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 11:00 - 12:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 12:00 - 13:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 13:00 - 14:00 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.028 14:00 - 15:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 15:00 - 16:00 4 1851 0.027 4 1851 0.027 4 1851 0.054 16:00 - 17:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 18:00 - 19:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 20:00 - 21:00 3 1468 0.000 3 1468 0.000 3 1468 0.000 21:00 - 22:00 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.055 0.055 0.110

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 NFR_Weekday Page 7 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/G - OTHER INDIVIDUAL NON-FOOD SUPERSTORE PSVS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 2 1252 0.000 2 1252 0.000 2 1252 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 10:00 - 11:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 11:00 - 12:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 12:00 - 13:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 13:00 - 14:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 14:00 - 15:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 15:00 - 16:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 16:00 - 17:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 18:00 - 19:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 20:00 - 21:00 3 1468 0.000 3 1468 0.000 3 1468 0.000 21:00 - 22:00 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.000 0.000 0.000

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 240315 B17.12 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Monday 27/04/15 NFR_Weekday Page 8 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/G - OTHER INDIVIDUAL NON-FOOD SUPERSTORE CYCLISTS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 2 1252 0.040 2 1252 0.000 2 1252 0.040 08:00 - 09:00 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.028 09:00 - 10:00 4 1851 0.027 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.041 10:00 - 11:00 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.014 11:00 - 12:00 4 1851 0.027 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.027 12:00 - 13:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 13:00 - 14:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 14:00 - 15:00 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.027 4 1851 0.041 15:00 - 16:00 4 1851 0.027 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.041 16:00 - 17:00 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.028 17:00 - 18:00 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.014 4 1851 0.028 18:00 - 19:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 4 1851 0.000 20:00 - 21:00 3 1468 0.000 3 1468 0.000 3 1468 0.000 21:00 - 22:00 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.191 0.097 0.288

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 040515 B17.13 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/05/15 NFR Weekend Trip Rates Page 1 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

Calculation Reference: AUDIT-750001-150506-0518 TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 01 - RETAIL Category : G - OTHER INDIVIDUAL NON-FOOD SUPERSTORE VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 02 SOUTH EAST EX ESSEX 1 days 06 WEST MIDLANDS WO WORCESTERSHIRE 1 days 07 YORKSHIRE & NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE NY NORTH YORKSHIRE 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Filtering Stage 2 selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Retail floor area Actual Range: 800 to 2500 (units: sqm) Range Selected by User: 125 to 7000 (units: sqm)

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/07 to 17/10/11

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Saturday 3 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 3 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

Selected Locations: Edge of Town Centre 1 Edge of Town 2

Selected Location Sub Categories: Retail Zone 1 Built-Up Zone 1 No Sub Category 1

This data displays the number of surveys per location sub-category within the selected set. The location sub-categories consist of Commercial Zone, Industrial Zone, Development Zone, Residential Zone, Retail Zone, Built-Up Zone, Village, Out of Town, High Street and No Sub Category. TRICS 7.2.1 040515 B17.13 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/05/15 NFR Weekend Trip Rates Page 2 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

Filtering Stage 3 selection:

Use Class: A 1 3 days

Population within 1 mile: 5,001 to 10,000 2 days 15,001 to 20,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 100,001 to 125,000 2 days 125,001 to 250,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 1.1 to 1.5 3 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Petrol filling station: Included in the survey count 0 days Excluded from count or no filling station 3 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that include petrol filling station activity, and the number of surveys that do not.

Travel Plan: No 3 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place, and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans. TRICS 7.2.1 040515 B17.13 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/05/15 NFR Weekend Trip Rates Page 3 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 EX-01-G-01 MFI ESSEX LONDON ROAD LEXDEN COLCHESTER Edge of Town No Sub Category Total Retail floor area: 8 0 0 sqm Survey date: SATURDAY 19/07/08 Survey Type: MANUAL 2 NY-01-G-02 CURRY'S NORTH YORKSHIRE HURRICANE WAY CLIFTON MOOR YORK Edge of Town Retail Zone Total Retail floor area: 2 5 0 0 sqm Survey date: SATURDAY 19/09/09 Survey Type: MANUAL 3 WO-01-G-01 PC WORLD WORCESTERSHIRE TYBRIDGE STREET

WORCESTER Edge of Town Centre Built-Up Zone Total Retail floor area: 1 5 0 0 sqm Survey date: SATURDAY 20/06/09 Survey Type: MANUAL

MANUALLY DESELECTED SITES

Site Ref Reason for Deselection GM-01-G-04 Parking Provision Onsite TRICS 7.2.1 040515 B17.13 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/05/15 NFR Weekend Trip Rates Page 4 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/G - OTHER INDIVIDUAL NON-FOOD SUPERSTORE VEHICLES Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 3 1600 0.563 3 1600 0.104 3 1600 0.666 09:00 - 10:00 3 1600 1.229 3 1600 0.708 3 1600 1.937 10:00 - 11:00 3 1600 2.521 3 1600 1.833 3 1600 4.354 11:00 - 12:00 3 1600 3.292 3 1600 3.000 3 1600 6.292 12:00 - 13:00 3 1600 3.479 3 1600 2.917 3 1600 6.396 13:00 - 14:00 3 1600 2.854 3 1600 3.563 3 1600 6.416 14:00 - 15:00 3 1600 3.896 3 1600 3.875 3 1600 7.771 15:00 - 16:00 3 1600 3.417 3 1600 2.729 3 1600 6.146 16:00 - 17:00 3 1600 3.000 3 1600 3.417 3 1600 6.417 17:00 - 18:00 3 1600 1.458 3 1600 2.833 3 1600 4.291 18:00 - 19:00 3 1600 0.021 3 1600 0.729 3 1600 0.750 19:00 - 20:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.042 3 1600 0.042 20:00 - 21:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 21:00 - 22:00 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 2 5.729 2 5.749 5 1.478

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 800 - 2500 (units: sqm) Survey date date range: 01/01/07 - 17/10/11 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 0 Number of Saturdays: 3 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys manually removed from selection: 1

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 040515 B17.13 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/05/15 NFR Weekend Trip Rates Page 5 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/G - OTHER INDIVIDUAL NON-FOOD SUPERSTORE TAXIS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 10:00 - 11:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 11:00 - 12:00 3 1600 0.021 3 1600 0.021 3 1600 0.042 12:00 - 13:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 13:00 - 14:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 14:00 - 15:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 15:00 - 16:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 16:00 - 17:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 18:00 - 19:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 20:00 - 21:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 21:00 - 22:00 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.021 0.021 0.042

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 040515 B17.13 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/05/15 NFR Weekend Trip Rates Page 6 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/G - OTHER INDIVIDUAL NON-FOOD SUPERSTORE OGVS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 3 1600 0.021 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.021 10:00 - 11:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 11:00 - 12:00 3 1600 0.042 3 1600 0.021 3 1600 0.063 12:00 - 13:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.021 3 1600 0.021 13:00 - 14:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.021 3 1600 0.021 14:00 - 15:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 15:00 - 16:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 16:00 - 17:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 18:00 - 19:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 20:00 - 21:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 21:00 - 22:00 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.063 0.063 0.126

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 040515 B17.13 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/05/15 NFR Weekend Trip Rates Page 7 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/G - OTHER INDIVIDUAL NON-FOOD SUPERSTORE PSVS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 10:00 - 11:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 11:00 - 12:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 12:00 - 13:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 13:00 - 14:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 14:00 - 15:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 15:00 - 16:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 16:00 - 17:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 17:00 - 18:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 18:00 - 19:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 19:00 - 20:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 20:00 - 21:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 21:00 - 22:00 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.000 0.000 0.000

Parameter summary

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.2.1 040515 B17.13 (C) 2015 TRICS Consortium Ltd Wednesday 06/05/15 NFR Weekend Trip Rates Page 8 Gateway TSP Limited Surrey Technology Centre, 40 Occam Road Guildford Licence No: 750001

TRIP RATE for Land Use 01 - RETAIL/G - OTHER INDIVIDUAL NON-FOOD SUPERSTORE CYCLISTS Calculation factor: 100 sqm BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip Time Range Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate Days RFA Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 08:00 - 09:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 09:00 - 10:00 3 1600 0.063 3 1600 0.063 3 1600 0.124 10:00 - 11:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 11:00 - 12:00 3 1600 0.042 3 1600 0.042 3 1600 0.084 12:00 - 13:00 3 1600 0.021 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.021 13:00 - 14:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.021 3 1600 0.021 14:00 - 15:00 3 1600 0.021 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.021 15:00 - 16:00 3 1600 0.042 3 1600 0.021 3 1600 0.063 16:00 - 17:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.021 3 1600 0.021 17:00 - 18:00 3 1600 0.042 3 1600 0.042 3 1600 0.084 18:00 - 19:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.021 3 1600 0.021 19:00 - 20:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 20:00 - 21:00 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 3 1600 0.000 21:00 - 22:00 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 1 800 0.000 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 0.230 0.230 0.460

Parameter summary

APPENDIX F Extracts of ARLA Development Transport Assessment PMcL/3008d51/April 2014 Mixed use Development, Arla Dairy Site, South Ruislip Transport Assessment ______

Table 4.2 Traffic Impact from redeveloped Arla Site as warehouse and/or light industrial use

Junction New Vehicle Trips (vehicles) Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak Victoria Road/Long Drive 50 59 Station Approach/West End Road 26 21 Polish Memorial 23 19

4.12 The Transport Assessment does not include the potential of the redeveloped site in a ‘do nothing’ scenario. The data is presented for background information only and the effect of this omission is to underestimate the traffic conditions within the ‘do nothing’ scenario, providing a more robust assessment when comparing the traffic impact on the existing highway network with and without development.

Committed Development

4.13 Traffic flow figures shown in Figures F243-F254 (Appendix 7) are included for committed development sites 1/2/3, 4, 5/6 and 7. Total traffic flows for all committed development sites together are shown in Figures F255-F257 (Appendix 7). Where Saturday flows are not available, weekday flows have been used. Table 4.3 provides a schedule of the committed developments and matches the site references with the appropriate planning application or potential use:

Table 4.3 Committed Development as used in Figures F243-F257 Ref Ref. No. Application/Potential Use

1 67080/APP/2010/1419 South Ruislip Library, Plot A, Victoria Road, Ruislip 2 67080/APP/2010/1420 South Ruislip Library, Plot B, Victoria Road, Ruislip 3 66408/APP/2009/2202 Adjacent to South Ruislip Library, Victoria Road, Ruislip 4 144/APP/2008/1890 Crown Cash and Carry Warehouse Long Drive Ruislip 5 33667/APP/2006/2141 Sainsbury’s Consented extension 6 33667/APP/2012/3214 Sainsbury’s Replacement Store 7. n/a Re-use of Comet unit for A1 food retail

Redwood Partnership Page | 33 PMcL/3008d51/April 2014 Mixed use Development, Arla Dairy Site, South Ruislip Transport Assessment ______

4.14 The assessment includes the traffic generation potential from the vacant former Comet store re-opened as a supermarket (site 7). It should be noted that research by the Competition Commission (Ref: ‘The supply of groceries in the UK market investigation’, 30 April 2008, para 4.41) concluded that top-up stores were more often located in town centres and that one-stop (main weekly food shop) shopping which generates more new traffic was carried out in stores with a size greater than 1,400 sq metres where there was a wider range of goods.

4.15 The floor area of the former Comet unit is 1,118 sq metres and if used for A1 food retail would provide a limited range of products. Clearly, given the size of the proposed unit we consider that the unit would not generate primary one-stop carborne shopping trips, but would instead cater mainly for top-up or convenience shopping, where shoppers would combine their shopping trip with other visits locally or would provide a convenient shopping location for local residents and workers already passing the site.

4.16 Notwithstanding the above, for the purposes of this assessment we have used the robust Sainsbury’s South Ruislip vehicle trip rates to produce Table 4.4 which replicates the JS foodstore trips rates and shows the resultant gross vehicle trips:

Table 4.4 Assumed 100% new traffic attraction to Comet unit re-occupied as foodstore Time Period Trip Rate Total vehicular trips (Trips per 100sqm GFA) Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures Weekday (08:00-09:00) 4.377 2.412 49 27 Weekday (17:00-18:00) 5.831 6.150 65 69 Saturday peak (12:00-13:00) 6.757 6.438 76 72

4.17 We have taken 30% of all vehicle trips as new on the network with the remaining trips already on the network as pass-by or diverted trips. Table 4.5 shows that new vehicle trips generated by a replacement foodstore on the Comet site. Figures F252-F254 (Appendix 7) show the total new vehicle trips distributed on the highway network:

Table 4.5 New vehicle trips to Comet unit re-occupied as foodstore (30% new) Time Period Total vehicular trips Arrivals Departures Weekday (08:00-09:00) 15 8 Weekday (17:00-18:00) 20 21 Saturday peak (12:00-13:00) 23 22

Redwood Partnership Page | 34 PMcL/3008d51/April 2014 Mixed use Development, Arla Dairy Site, South Ruislip Transport Assessment ______

4.18 It is important to note that the addition of both committed development together with traffic growth within this assessment provides a very robust test of the highway network as committed development is included in national traffic growth forecasts which have been calculated for the local Hillingdon Area. This will result in an element of double counting of the traffic estimates for future years.

Vacant Sites – Aviva Site

4.19 The existing Aviva site is currently closed and unoccupied and as such potential traffic from this site has not been included within the existing surveyed base traffic flows. The site has A1 non- food retail consent for 4,772m2 GFA, therefore the affect of this additional traffic, when the site is re-occupied and trading, needs to be included in the assessment. The site consists of 2 separate retail units within a single building and an adjacent external garden centre. Both units would benefit from linked trips between each, which has not been considered. Only car driver data for the Aviva unit is included in this assessment. TRICS data for the potential traffic to the adjacent Aviva site is included in Appendix 5. Table 4.6 shows the summary of the TRICS vehicle trip rate estimate for the vacant Aviva retail units:

Table 4.6 Gross vehicle trip rate attraction to the Aviva units (vehs/1002 GFA) Assessment Period Arrivals Departures

Friday AM 08:00-09:00hrs 0.636 0.450

Friday PM 17:00-18:00hrs 1.259 1.307

Saturday 12:00-13:00hrs 4.057 3.248

4.20 Table 4.7 shows the resultant vehicle trips applied to the Aviva development size of 4,772 m2 GFA. Aviva arrivals and departures will be discounted on the public highway by 30% to allow for pass-by, diverted and linked-trips as shown in Table 4.8. The resultant traffic flows are distributed on the highway in Figure F215-F217 (Appendix 7):

Table 4.7 Gross trips to the Aviva Units (vehicles per hour) Assessment Period Arrivals Departures

Weekday AM 08:00-09:00hrs 30 21

Weekday PM 17:00-18:00hrs 60 62

Saturday 12:00-13:00hrs 194 155

Redwood Partnership Page | 35 PMcL/3008d51/April 2014 Mixed use Development, Arla Dairy Site, South Ruislip Transport Assessment ______

Table 4.8 Discounted trips to the Aviva Units (vehicles per hour) – Table 4.7 x 0.7 Assessment Period Arrivals Departures

Weekday AM 08:00-09:00hrs 21 15

Weekday PM 17:00-18:00hrs 42 43

Saturday 12:00-13:00hrs 136 109

Non car modes of travel

4.21 A detailed assessment has been undertaken of the modal split of person trips for each use on the site. Multi-modal trip estimates are included in Appendix 6 for the development together with the appropriate TRAVL sites used in the assessment.

4.22 For the residential development, travel to work statistics are included in the Neighbourhood Statistics, 2011 dataset QS701EW. Table 4.9 shows the modal split for both Hillingdon Borough and South Ruislip Ward. The proportions in the dataset are of usual residents aged 16-74 apart from those working from home and unemployed:

Table 4.9 Residential site modal Split Modal Split (%) Residential Mode South Ruislip LB Hillingdon of Travel Ward Underground 23.7 13.9 Train 4.4 4.5 Bus 5.1 12.6 Taxi 0.6 0.4 PTW 1.3 0.8 Car driver 49.4 55.1 Car passenger 3.0 3.3 Cycle 2.1 1.6 Walk 10.4 7.8 Total 100.0 100.0

4.23 However travel to work data does not adequately represent the range of other trips throughout the day. We consider the modal split derived from Neighbourhood Statistics and shown in Table 4.9 does not reflect a realistic daily modal split which would contain more shopping, leisure and visitor trips by modes of travel other than work trips. The modal split for the residential development has therefore been estimated from TRAVL data as a more reliable assessment of daily travel modes.

Redwood Partnership Page | 36 PMcL/3008d51/April 2014 Mixed use Development, Arla Dairy Site, South Ruislip Transport Assessment ______

capacity with a maximum mean max queue of 22 vehicles. In the PM and Saturday peak hours the queuing is not shown to extend as far as the site access junction and it is during these periods that the traffic impact of the development is at its highest. It should also be noted that the saturation flows included in the model would have measured any queuing effect from the South Ruislip Station pedestrian crossing.

4.84 Overall, we consider the additional capacity introduced at the Victoria Road/Long Drive junction as a result of the proposed improvements will provide a better junction operation for both local and through traffic and the proposed development traffic. The overall impact of the development on this junction is not considered to be severe even considering the robust traffic assumptions. The proposed improvements will benefit the operation of the surrounding highway network at all times of the week including times outside the peak hours. The improvements will produce further benefits to pedestrian and cycle safety at the junction by the provision of wider pedestrian refuge islands and advanced stop line for cyclists.

Victoria Road / Field End Road Roundabout

4.85 This roundabout is located 1.2km east of the Victoria Road/Long Drive junction. A relative impact assessment has been undertaken for this junction. Table 4.33 shows the total vehicular impact on the junction as detailed in Figures 264-266. The results show that there will be a reduction in peak hour traffic levels at this roundabout during in 2 periods mainly brought about by primary transfer trips who would be travelling through this roundabout for food shopping purposes at Sainsbury’s and Waitrose in South Harrow.

Table 4.33 Impact in vehicles at Victoria Road / Field End Road Period Development Impact (vehs+Ref)) Weekday AM Peak Hour -50 (F264) 0800-0900hrs Weekday AM Peak Hour -2(F265) 0800-0900hrs Saturday Peak Hour 10 (F266) 1200-1300hrs

Redwood Partnership Page | 57 PMcL/3008d51/April 2014 Mixed use Development, Arla Dairy Site, South Ruislip Transport Assessment ______

network peak hours. In addition, it is noted that this junction is approximately 1.7km from the site and there is likely to be a high level of dilution associated with development trips”. The analysis for this application shows that the impact remains at 28 vehicles for the Saturday peak period which should also be deemed to be acceptable.

Victoria Road/Pembroke Road Traffic Signal Junction

4.95 The Victoria Road/Pembroke Road junction is a traffic signal controlled junction located 1,8km north of the site. Between the site and the Victoria Road/Pembroke Road junction are 17 side road junctions off Victoria Road including 2 roundabouts. This significant number of junctions will provide opportunities for motorists to dilute to, or come from, other areas whilst accessing the site. For this reason traffic accessing the site, during the peak hours is therefore not anticipated to have an impact on this junction, located at such a distance from the site. The net increase in traffic along the route from the site to the Victoria Road/Pembroke Road junction is shown to be minimal (Figures F264-F266).

4.96 During the Previous Application, LB Hillingdon accepted these arguments; the Officer’s Report stating “Therefore it is considered that it is unlikely that the development would have a material impact at this junction”.

VISSIM Micro-simulation model

4.97 Hillingdon Council have requested a micro-simulation VISSIM model of the study area as far as the Polish Memorial. The wider highway network has been subject to a detailed VISSIM modelling exercise prepared by consultants AECOM. The VISSIM model assesses the impact of a wider area during the Friday AM, Friday PM and Saturday midday peak hours for the future year scenarios with both traffic growth and committed development and the net impact of development traffic.

4.98 The summary of the VISSIM modelling output suggests that the development proposals will have a minimal negative impact on the highway network. The results show that across the study network travel journey times will generally reduce for both general traffic and buses. This travel reduction is attributed to the proposed highway improvements along Victoria Road.

Redwood Partnership Page | 61 PMcL/3008d51/April 2014 Mixed use Development, Arla Dairy Site, South Ruislip Transport Assessment ______

4.99 In terms of overall network performance, the VISSIM results suggest there will be a slight increase in delay throughout the network due to increase in traffic in the ‘with development’ scenario, however the increase is generally less than 10 seconds and therefore would likely go unnoticed by drivers on the road network.

4.100 The findings of the VISSIM assessment show that the development proposals at the Arla Dairy Site would have a minimal negative impact on highway network performance. Indeed, the conclusion is that the VISSIM results suggest that journey times will improve along the majority of routes within the network due to the proposed changes to junctions being proposed as part of the development’s highway improvements.

4.101 The VISSIM assessment is submitted as a separate application document.

Redwood Partnership Page | 62 10

Long Drive 14 ‐41 23 ‐24 West Mead

1 ‐231 10 25 257 12 53 16 Victoria Road

1 ‐184 3 18 255 8 ‐45 203 296 8 10 68 0 ‐47 Drive Leisure Residential Retail Long ue ach n o Avenue

Approach

Station

03A40 Western 8534 ‐1 West End Road

13 7

F265=F222+F225+F228+F231+F234+F236+F238+F241

ARLA DAIRY SITE, SOUTH RUISLIP FRIDAY PM 1700‐1800HRS ‐ NET EFFECT OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS FIGURE F265 13

Long Drive 17 ‐40 23 ‐24 West Mead

3 ‐274 ‐50 40 315 7 82 21 Victoria Road

1 ‐233 ‐23 13 306 5 ‐69 247 307 6 6 95 ‐63 Drive Leisure Residential Retail Long ue ach n o Avenue

Approach

Station

26A40 Western 10 7 6 3 1 West End Road

22 10

F266=F223+F226+F229+F232+F235+F237+F239+F242

ARLA DAIRY SITE, SOUTH RUISLIP SATURDAY 1200‐1300HRS ‐ NET EFFECT OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS FIGURE F266

APPENDIX G Extracts of Aldi Development Transport Statement and Technical Note

Table 5.6 – Vehicle Trip Generation Comparison – Approved vs Proposed Friday Peak Saturday Peak Time Period Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures Proposed Development 49 53 82 84 Approved Scheme 58 58 117 99 Difference -9 -5 -35 -15

5.14 The data in Table 5.5 shows that the proposed development will result in a reduction in vehicle trips during both the Friday and Saturday peak periods.

Arla Food Site Impact

5.15 As noted in paragraph 3.19 above, a planning application for the redevelopment of the former Arla Food site was submitted in May 2014 (Ref: 66819/APP/2014/1600). As part of the TA undertaken by Redwood Partnership (April 2014) and submitted in support of the application, trip generation for the proposed development site was assessed.

5.16 Within the TA, to incorporate the impact of the proposed Victoria Road Retail Park site, trip rates were derived from the TRICS database for 4,772m2 of A1 non-food retail. Table 5.7 below summarises the trip rates extracted from the Arla Food site TA.

Table 5.7 – Proposed Site – Trip Rates (Arla Foods Transport Assessment, 2014) Time Period Arrivals Departures Total Friday (17:00 – 18:00) 1.259 1.307 2.566 Saturday (12:00 – 13:00) 4.057 3.248 7.305

5.17 Within the TA a discount of 30% was applied to vehicle trips generated by the site to allow for pass-by, diverted and linked trips. Table 5.8 shows the resultant vehicle trips applied to the proposed site within the submitted Arla Foods TA.

Table 5.8 – Proposed Site – Trip Generation (Arla Foods Transport Assessment, 2014) Time Period Arrivals Departures Total Friday (17:00 – 18:00) 42 43 85 Saturday (12:00 – 13:00) 136 109 245

Victoria Road Retail Park, South Ruislip 19 R01-GS-Transport Statement July 2014

Page: 4

20. As noted within the submitted TS, not all traffic generated by either unit will be ‘new’ to the local highway network. In line with the assumptions applied within the submitted TS, 20% of trips to Unit 2 are considered linked trips and will be deducted from the total traffic generation. Table 4 below summarises the resulting traffic generation. Table 5: Unit 2 - Vehicle Trip Generation – 20% Linked Trip Factor Friday Peak Saturday Peak Units Arrive Depart Total Arrive Depart Total Submitted TS 24 28 52 54 54 108 Post Application (Worst Case) 36 35 71 65 54 119 Difference 12 7 19 11 0 11

21. The data in Table 5 indicates with the inclusion of linked trips, the number of additional trips generated by the proposed development will be minimal.

Total Traffic Generation

22. Table 6 below summarises the total increase in vehicle trips generated by the revised trip rates compared to the submitted trip generation.

Table 6: Total Development Traffic Generation

Friday Peak Saturday Peak Units Arrive Depart Total Arrive Depart Total Submitted TS 83 88 172 133 134 266 Post Application (Worst Case) 118 121 239 162 144 307 Difference 35 32 67 30 11 41

23. The data in Table 6 shows that the application of the revised trip rates is likely to result in 67 additional two-way trips during the PM peak and 41 two-way trips during the Saturday peak.

24. The site has planning consent (Ref: 64445/APP/2013/1050) for the refurbishment and partial demolition of Unit A. To determine the likely impact of the proposed development, trips generated by the proposed development will be compared to trips generated by the consented scheme. Table 7 below summarises the vehicle trips extracted from the consented TA compared to those generated by the proposed development Table 7: Vehicle Trip Generation Comparison – Consented vs Proposed Friday Peak Saturday Peak Time Period Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures Proposed Development 70 71 101 88 Consented Scheme 58 58 117 99 Difference 12 13 -16 -11

Page: 5

25. The data in Table 7 shows that the proposed development using the worst case trip rate would result in a minor increase in trips during the Friday peak period and a reduction in trips during the Saturday peak. It is considered that the proposed increase shown during the Friday peak will have a minor impact on the site access junction and a negligible impact once distributed around the local highway network.

Highway Impact

26. The LBH have requested clarification on how the existing signal controlled junction that provides access to the site would operate following the proposed development.

27. Following further discussions with the LBH, it is our understanding that’s works associated with the adjacent Arla site will begin in January 2015. As noted within the supporting TS, when the Arla site comes forward, the Arla scheme proposes improvements of the existing shared site access/Victoria Road junction. In addition, the approved Arla scheme proposes to stop up the existing access into the site from the Victoria Road/West Mead signalised junction.

28. In light of the above, it has been agreed with the LBH that an assessment of the likely impact of the proposed development on the proposed Arla access arrangement should be undertaken to ascertain the likely impact.

29. Within the approved Arla TA, traffic generated by the existing site was considered within their junction impact assessment. Table 8 summarises the number of vehicle trips applied within the Arla TA compared to those noted above in Table 7 for the proposed scheme.

Table 8: Proposed vs Arla Application – Traffic Generation Friday Peak Saturday Peak Time Period Arrivals Departures Arrivals Departures Proposed Development 70 71 101 88 Arla Application 42 43 136 109 Difference 28 28 -35 -21

30. The data summarised in Table 8 shows that compared to the vehicle trips applied within the Arla TA, the proposed development results in a minor increase in vehicle trips during the Friday peak. However, as shown, the proposed development is likely to result in a reduction in vehicle trips during the Saturday peak.

31. On the basis that the vehicle trip generation assessment indicates there will only be an increase in vehicle trips during the Friday peak, this is the only peak period assessed as part of this assessment.

32. Figure 268 within the approved Arla TA (Appendix B) identifies the traffic flows at the site access junction for the ‘2015+Aviva+Committed+Development’ scenario. Based on the total traffic flows at the junction, the increase in vehicles as a result of the proposed development (Table 8) represents a 3% increase in traffic flows at the junction.

APPENDIX H Stage 1 Road Safety Audit of Proposed Site Access/Victoria Road Junction

LIDL – SOUTH RUISLIP VICTORIA ROAD ACCESS PROPOSALS

STAGE 1 ROAD SAFETY AUDIT REPORT

REQUESTED BY: GATEWAY TSP

OCTOBER 2014

RKS Associates

Project: Victoria Road/Stonefield Way, Ruislip

Client: Gateway TSP

Document: Stage 1 Road Safety Audit

RKS Associates ref: VRP520-01

th Issue date: 29 October 2014

Status: Final

Authorised by: VP

RKS Associates

11 Falconer Road Bu s h e y Hertfordshire W D2 3 3 AQ Tel: 0783 777 6252

Email: [email protected]

Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Report RKS Victoria Road / Stonefield Way, Ruislip Associates

CONTENTS

1 Introduction ...... 1 2 General ...... 3 3 Local Alignment ...... 4 4 Junctions ...... 5 5 Non-Motorised User Provision ...... 6 6 Road Signs, Carriageway markings & Lighting ...... 7 7 Audit Team Statement ...... 8

Appendices

Appendix A: Location of Problems Identified During Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Appendix B: Designers Response

Ref: VRP520-01 i

Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Report RKS Victoria Road / Stonefield Way, Ruislip Associates

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 RKS Associates Limited has been commissioned by Gateway TSP Limited to undertake a Stage 1 Road Safety Audit (RSA) for a new access serving a new Lidl store and adjoining retail units on Victoria Road, Ruislip, in London Borough of Hillingdon.

1.2 The highway works include the provision of a new vehicular access on Victoria Road, stopping up part of the existing access road running parallel to Victoria Road and the provision of dropped kerbs and tactile paving across the new access.

1.3 Gateway TSP Limited has supplied the following information upon which this Stage 1 RSA is based:

 Gateway TSP Drawing 13/0917/002 Rev B: Proposed Layout Victoria Road Access Option;  Gateway TSP Drawings 13/0917/TK17 – 16.5m Articulated HGV Entering 2- way Victoria Road Access Junction;  Gateway TSP Drawings 13/0917/TK18 – 16.5m Articulated HGV leaving Victoria Road Access Junction;  Poole & Pattle Architects Drawing 3096/304/P – Proposed Site Layout;  Personal Injury Accident Data for 3-year period up to May 2014.

1.4 The Safety Audit Team consisted of Mr Vimal Patel and Mr Mark Barrett. The Audit Team have had no involvement in the design of the scheme apart from undertaking the Stage 1 RSA in July 2012 for a separate vehicular access on Stonefield Way. The Safety Audit has been undertaken following examination of the submitted documents and a site visit on Monday 27th October 2014, during which the weather was sunny and the road surface was dry. No traffic congestion was observed during site visit, although car parking was prevalent along the access road.

1.5 The Stage 1 RSA has been undertaken in accordance with the relevant sections of HD19/03, part of the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB). No departures from standards have been indicated by the Design Engineers.

Ref: VRP520-01 1

Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Report RKS Victoria Road / Stonefield Way, Ruislip Associates

1.6 The Safety Audit Team has examined only matters relating to road safety implications of the scheme and has not verified compliance of the design to any other criteria. Problems identified in this report are considered by the Audit Team to merit action in order to improve the safety of the scheme and to minimise accident risk for all users.

1.7 All of the problems identified in this report are considered by the Audit Team to require action in order to improve the safety of the scheme and to minimise accident occurrence for all users. The location of the problems identified in this Safety Audit is shown in Appendix A where the reference numbers relate to the problems identified in this report.

Ref: VRP520-01 2

Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Report RKS Victoria Road / Stonefield Way, Ruislip Associates

2 GENERAL

The PIA data has identified that only one PIA has occurred along Victoria Road, this occurred to the west of the proposed access at the Victoria Road/Stonefield Way junction. The PIA resulted in a slight injury and was caused by a vehicle turning right into the path of a vehicle overtaking slow moving traffic in the opposite direction. The PIA data does not indicate any road safety issues associated with the current road layout.

2.1 Problem: Summary: Drainage Location: Access Road/Victoria Road

No details have been provided in respect of drainage and it is therefore not possible at Stage 1 RSA to ascertain whether or not there will be any safety implications. It is anticipated that the introduction of the new access may increase the risk for potential of localised flooding and inherently increase the risk of vehicular collisions.

Recommendation: Ensure that drainage calculations are undertaken at detailed design stage, if appropriate; provide additional drainage to mitigate localised flooding.

2.2 Problem: Summary: No longitudinal or cross sections supplied Location: Proposed site access and footways

Longitudinal/cross sections through the proposed site access have not been provided at this time and it is therefore not possible for the Audit Team to ascertain whether or not any safety issues will arise. The Audit team noted that there is a level difference between the carriageway and verge/footpath. Poor vertical alignment of the access road could cause a hazard and risk injury to road users

Recommendation: Provide sections through the new access and footways as part of detailed design, for the purposes of Stage 2 RSA.

Ref: VRP520-01 3

Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Report RKS Victoria Road / Stonefield Way, Ruislip Associates

3 LOCAL ALIGNMENT

3.1 The Audit Team raises no concerns at this Stage 1 RSA in respect of local alignment.

Ref: VRP520-01 4

Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Report RKS Victoria Road / Stonefield Way, Ruislip Associates

4 JUNCTIONS

4.1 Problem: Summary: Potential collisions associated for vehicles U-turning Location: Stopped-up section of Access Road (west of proposed access)

The scheme proposals include the stopping up of the access road running parallel with Victoria Road to the west of the proposed site access. It is noted that the existing access serving Kwik Fit Centre (adjacent unit) will be used as a turning head. There is concern that motorists performing a U-turn at this location may be at greater risk of vehicle collisions with traffic exiting Kwik Fit Centre.

Recommendation: The kerb works associated with the stopping up of the access road should be moved further west up to the access serving the Kwik Fit Centre thereby providing a dedicated access to the Kwik Fit Centre. Appropriate signs should be placed on the entry to the access road to inform motorists that access road is for access to designated retail/commercial units along this section of the access road.

Ref: VRP520-01 5

Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Report RKS Victoria Road / Stonefield Way, Ruislip Associates

5 NON-MOTORISED USER PROVISION

5.1 The Audit Team raises no concerns at this Stage 1 RSA in respect of Non-Motorised User Provision.

Ref: VRP520-01 6

Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Report RKS Victoria Road / Stonefield Way, Ruislip Associates

6 ROAD SIGNS, CARRIAGEWAY MARKINGS & LIGHTING

6.1 The Audit Team raises no concerns at this Stage 1 RSA in respect of Road Signs, Carriageway Markings & Street Lighting.

Ref: VRP520-01 7

Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Report RKS Victoria Road / Stonefield Way, Ruislip Associates

7 AUDIT TEAM STATEMENT

7.1 We certify that this Road Safety Audit has been carried out in accordance with document HD 19/03, its sole purpose being to identify features of the scheme that could be removed or modified to improve safety. No member of the Audit Team has been involved in the scheme design.

Audit Team Leader Vimal Patel, BEng (Hons) Road Safety Audit Consultant

Signed

Date: 29th October 2014

Audit Team Member(s) Mark Barrett Road Safety Audit Consultant

Signed

Date: 29th October 2014

Ref: VRP520-01 8

RKS Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Report Associates Victoria Road / Stonefield Way, Ruislip

Appendix A

Ref: VRP520-01 1

Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Report RKS Victoria Road / Stonefield Way, Associates Ruislip

1 2.2 6. 2

4.1

RKS Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Report Associates Victoria Road / Stonefield Way, Ruislip

`Appendix B

Ref: VRP520-01 1

RKS Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Report Associates Victoria Road / Stonefield Way, Ruislip

Item Audit Team Recommendation(s) Designer’s Response No.

2.1 Ensure that drainage calculations are undertaken at Agreed – details of surface water drainage and detailed design stage, if appropriate; provide any service diversions will be provided as part of additional drainage to mitigate localised flooding. the detailed design, for the purposes of Stage 2 RSA.

2.2 Provide sections through the new access and Agreed – longitudinal and cross sections will be footways as part of detailed design, for the provided as part of the detailed design, for the purposes of Stage 2 RSA. purposes of Stage 2 RSA.

3.1 The Audit Team raises no concerns at this Stage 1 N/A RSA in respect of local alignment.

4.1 The kerb works associated with the stopping up of Further to the RSA comment, an amendment the access road should be moved further west up to has been made in Drawing 13/0917/002/C to access serving the Kwik Fit Centre thereby providing the turning head on the access road which has a dedicated access to the Kwik Fit Centre. Provide now been reduced in size. appropriate signage on the entry to the access road The access road serves the existing to inform motorists that access road is for access to retail/commercial units fronting Victoria Road at designated retail/commercial units. present. The Lidl proposal results in a reduction in length and not to the overall access arrangement on this no through road. It is not therefore considered necessary to install additional signage when there are no inherent safety concerns with the existing service road operation.

5.1 The Audit Team raises no concerns at this Stage 1 N/A RSA in respect of Non-Motorised User Provision.

6.1 The Audit Team raises no concerns at this Stage 1 N/A RSA in respect of Road Signs, Carriageway Markings & Street Lighting.

Designer’s Statement: I certify that I have considered the items that have arisen in the Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Report and my response to its recommendations are set out above.

...... Date: 29/10/2014 Designer

Ref: VRP520-01 1

RKS Stage 1 Road Safety Audit Report Associates Victoria Road / Stonefield Way, Ruislip

Audit Team Leader’s Statement: I accept/do not accept the Designer’s Response (please delete as appropriate)

...... Date: 30th October 2014 Audit Team Leader

Ref: VRP520-01 2

APPENDIX I Decision Notice for Stonefield Way Highway Improvements Mr James Barrett Application Ref: 41266/APP/2012/2939 Lidl U K 4-14 Blackbird Hill Wembley London NW9 8SD

TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (AS AMENDED)

GRANT OF PLANNING PERMISSION

The Council of the London Borough of Hillingdon as the Local Planning Authority within the meaning of the above Act and associated Orders GRANTS permission for the following:- Description of development: Traffic management alterations to make provision for two way vehicular traffic along a limited section of Stonefield Way towards the junction with Victoria Road, including the creation of a pedestrian traffic island and alterations to the carriageway width and with of footpath width and the provision of guardrails. Location of development: Unit 1 Victoria Road Ruislip

Date of application: 13 December 2012

Plan Numbers: See attached Schedule of plans

Permission is subject to the condition(s) listed on the attached schedule:-

Head of Planning & Enforcement

Date: 18 April 2013

NOTES: (i) Please also see the informatives included in the Schedule of Conditions.

(ii) Should you wish to appeal against any of the conditions please read the attached sheet which explains the procedure.

(iii)This decision does not convey any approval or consent which may be required under any by-laws, building regulations or under any Act other than the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended).

PDECSTD Page 1 of 5 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 (AS AMENDED)

GRANT OF PLANNING PERMISSION Application Ref: 41266/APP/2012/2939

SCHEDULE OF CONDITIONS

1 . The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.

REASON To comply with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2 . The development hereby permitted shall not be carried out except in complete accordance with the details shown on the submitted plans, numbers 3096 101 Rev. A, 12-0404 TK 21 Rev. B, 12-0404 TK 22 Rev. B, 3096 114 Rev. B and 3096 201 Rev. B and shall thereafter be retained/maintained for as long as the development remains in existence.

REASON To ensure the development complies with the provisions Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two Saved UDP Policies (November 2012) and the London Plan (July 2011).

3 . Development shall not begin until details of all traffic arrangements have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

REASON To ensure pedestrian and vehicular safety and convenience and to ensure adequate off-street parking, and loading facilities in compliance with Policy AM3 and AM8 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part Two Saved UDP Policies (November 2012) and Chapter 6 of the London Plan (July 2011). INFORMATIVES: 1 . The decision to GRANT planning permission has been taken having regard to all relevant planning legislation, regulations, guidance, circulars and Council policies, including The Human Rights Act (1998) (HRA 1998) which makes it unlawful for the Council to act incompatibly with Convention rights, specifically Article 6 (right to a fair hearing); Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life); Article 1 of the First Protocol (protection of property) and Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination).

2 . The decision to GRANT planning permission has been taken having regard to the policies and proposals in the Hillingdon Unitary Development Plan Saved Policies (September 2007) as incorporated into the Hillingdon Local Plan (2012) set out below, including Supplementary Planning Guidance, and to all relevant material considerations, including the London Plan (July 2011) and national guidance. AM3 Proposals for new roads or widening of existing roads AM8 Priority consideration to pedestrians in the design and implementation of road construction and traffic management schemes LPP 6.7 (2011) Better Streets and Surface Transport NPPF1

PDECSTD Page 2 of 5 Application Ref: 41266/APP/2012/2939

SCHEDULE OF CONDITIONS

3 . The applicant should note that a s278/38 agreement with the Council for the adoption of new carriageway/footway under the Highways Act 1980 will be required.

END OF SCHEDULE

Address: Planning, Environment, Education & Community Services London Borough of Hillingdon 3 North Civic Centre, High Street, Uxbridge UB8 1UW Tel: 01895 250230

PDECSTD Page 3 of 5 GRANT OF PLANNING PERMISSION Application Ref.No.: 41266/APP/2012/2939

SCHEDULE OF PLANS

Tree Survey to BS5837 - received 12 Dec 2012 BS5837:2012 Tree Survey - received 12 Dec 2012 Tree Constraints Plan - received 12 Dec 2012 SG/12/0404/TN - received 27 Nov 2012 Planning Statement (Issue 3) - received 27 Nov 2012 3096 201 - received 01 Apr 2013 3096 114 Rev. B - received 18 Apr 2013 12-0404 TK21 A - Rev. B dated 17 April 2013 - received 17 Apr 2013 12-0404 101 Rev. A - received 18 Apr 2013 12-0404 TK 22 Rev. B - received 18 Apr 2013 3096 201 Rev. B - received 18 Apr 2013

PDECSTD Page 4 of 5 Page 5 of 5

APPENDIX J JUNCTIONS 8 PICADY Output – Site Access/Victoria Road

Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Junctions 8 PICADY 8 - Priority Intersection Module Version: 8.0.4.487 [15039,24/03/2014] © Copyright TRL Limited, 2015 For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL: Tel: +44 (0)1344 770758 email: [email protected] Web: http://www.trlsoftware.co.uk The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the solution

Filename: 13-0917 Lidl Access Victoria Road Picady.arc8 Path: P:\2013\13-0917 lidl sth ruislip\Analysis\Picady\13-0917 April 2015 Comments Junctions 8 modelling Report generation date: 23/04/2015 17:26:57

» Proposed Site Access Junction - 2016 Uplifted Baseline with Proposed Development, AM » Proposed Site Access Junction - 2016 Uplifted Baseline with Proposed Development, PM » Proposed Site Access Junction - 2016 Uplifted Baseline with Proposed Development, Sat

Summary of junction performance

AM PM Sat Junction Junction Jun Queue Delay Queue Delay Queue Delay RFC LOS Delay RFC LOS Delay RFC LOS De (PCU) (s) (PCU) (s) (PCU) (s) (s) (s) ( Proposed Site Access Junction - 2016 Uplifted Baseline with Proposed Development Stream B-C 0.02 6.92 0.02 A 0.09 8.96 0.08 A 0.15 9.80 0.13 A Stream B-A 0.02 15.37 0.02 C 0.23 23.18 0.19 C 0.32 33.19 0.25 D Stream C-AB 0.02 7.19 0.02 A 0.07 8.32 0.07 A 0.17 9.59 0.15 A 8.72 13.69 15 Stream C-A ------Stream A-B ------Stream A-C ------

Values shown are the maximum values over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle. Junction LOS and Junction Delay are demand- weighted averages.

"D1 - 2016 Uplifted Baseline with Proposed Development, AM " model duration: 08:00 - 09:00 "D2 - 2016 Uplifted Baseline with Proposed Development, PM" model duration: 17:00 - 18:00 "D3 - 2016 Uplifted Baseline with Proposed Development, Sat" model duration: 14:00 - 15:00

Run using Junctions 8.0.4.487 at 23/04/2015 17:26:56

File summary

Title Lidl Access/Victoria Way Priority Junction Location South Ruislip Site Number Date 23/04/2015 Version Status Identifier Client Jobnumber Enumerator Gateway TSP Description

1 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Analysis Options

Vehicle Length Do Queue Calculate Residual Residual Capacity Criteria RFC Average Delay Threshold Queue Threshold (m) Variations Capacity Type Threshold (s) (PCU) 5.75 N/A 0.85 36.00 20.00

Units

Distance Units Speed Units Traffic Units Input Traffic Units Results Flow Units Average Delay Units Total Delay Units Rate Of Delay Units m kph Veh PCU perTimeSegment s -Min perMin

Proposed Site Access Junction - 2016 Uplifted Baseline with Proposed Development, AM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Specific Network Flow Network Capacity Reason For Roundabout Include In Use Specific Name Description Demand Set Locked Scaling Factor Scaling Factor Scaling Capacity Model Report Demand Set(s) (s) (%) (%) Factors Proposed Site N/A 100.000 100.000 Access Junction ü

Demand Set Details

Model Results Model Model Time Single Time Traffic Time For Scenario Start Finish Segment Time Run Use Name Period Description Profile Period Central Locked Name Time Time Length Segment Automatically Relationship Name Type Length Hour (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) Only (min) Only 2016 2016 Uplifted Uplifted Baseline with Baseline Proposed AM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 with ü Development, Proposed AM Development

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Major Road Direction Arm Order Do Geometric Delay Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) T-Junction Two-way A,B,C 8.72 A

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Left Normal/unknown

2 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description Arm Type A A Victoria Road (e) Major B B Site Access Minor C C Victoria Road (w) Major

Major Arm Geometry

Width of Has kerbed central Width of kerbed central Has right Width For Right Visibility For Right Blocking Queue Arm Blocks? carriageway (m) reserve reserve (m) turn bay Turn (m) Turn (m) (PCU) C 9.28 0.00 ü 3.14 90.00 ü 7.30 Geometries for Arm C are measured opposite Arm B. Geometries for Arm A (if relevant) are measured opposite Arm D.

Minor Arm Geometry

Lane Lane Lane Width at Estimate Flare Minor Width at Width at Width at Width at Visibility To Visibility To Arm Width Width Width give-way Flare Length Arm Type 5m (m) 10m (m) 15m (m) 20m (m) Left (m) Right (m) (m) (Left) (m) (Right) (m) (m) Length (PCU) One lane B plus 10.00 4.53 4.44 4.41 4.39 ü 3.00 77 99 flare

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Priority Intersection Slopes and Intercepts Slope Slope Slope Slope Intercept Junction Stream for for for for (PCU/TS) A-B A-C C-A C-B 1 B-A 129.289 0.081 0.204 0.128 0.292 1 B-C 179.810 0.095 0.239 - - 1 C-B 172.534 0.229 0.229 - - The slopes and intercepts shown above do NOT include any corrections or adjustments. Streams may be combined, in which case capacity will be adjusted. Values are shown for the first time segment only; they may differ for subsequent time segments.

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

PCU Estimate Default Vehicle Vehicle Vehicle Default Turning Turning Turning Vehicle Mix Factor from Vehicle Mix Varies Mix Varies Mix Varies Turning Proportions Proportions Proportions Source for a HV entry/exit Mix Over Time Over Turn Over Entry Proportions Vary Over Time Vary Over Turn Vary Over Entry (PCU) counts HV 2.00 ü ü Percentages ü ü ü

3 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (Veh/TS) Flow Scaling Factor (%) A DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 B DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 C DIRECT ü N/A 100.000

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (08:00-08:15) To A B C A 0.000 2.000 164.000 From B 1.000 0.000 2.000 C 174.000 2.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (08:00-08:15) To A B C A 0.00 0.01 0.99 From B 0.33 0.00 0.67 C 0.99 0.01 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (08:15-08:30) To A B C A 0.000 2.000 191.000 From B 1.000 0.000 2.000 C 215.000 2.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (08:15-08:30) To A B C A 0.00 0.01 0.99 From B 0.33 0.00 0.67 C 0.99 0.01 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (08:30-08:45) To A B C A 0.000 2.000 144.000 From B 1.000 0.000 2.000 C 196.000 2.000 0.000

4 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (08:30-08:45) To A B C A 0.00 0.01 0.99 From B 0.33 0.00 0.67 C 0.99 0.01 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (08:45-09:00) To A B C A 0.000 2.000 158.000 From B 1.000 0.000 2.000 C 183.000 2.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (08:45-09:00) To A B C A 0.00 0.01 0.99 From B 0.33 0.00 0.67 C 0.99 0.01 0.00

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 1.000 1.000 1.028 From B 1.000 1.000 1.000 C 1.049 1.000 1.000

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.0 0.0 2.8 From B 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 4.9 0.0 0.0

5 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Total Total Inclusive Max Max Average Average Rate Of Inclusive Total Max Max Junction Queueing Average Stream Delay Queue Demand Queueing Queueing Delay Queueing Delay RFC LOS Arrivals Delay (PCU- Queueing Delay (s) (PCU) (PCU/TS) Delay (s) (PCU-min/min) (PCU-min) (PCU) min) (s) B-C 0.02 6.92 0.02 A 2.00 8.00 0.87 6.52 0.01 0.87 6.52 B-A 0.02 15.37 0.02 C 1.00 4.00 0.88 13.23 0.01 0.88 13.23 C-AB 0.02 7.19 0.02 A 2.00 8.00 0.91 6.83 0.02 0.91 6.83 C-A - - - - 201.41 805.63 - - - - - A-B - - - - 2.00 8.00 - - - - - A-C - - - - 168.85 675.40 - - - - -

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (08:00-08:15)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-C 2.00 2.00 1.99 0.00 138.85 0.014 0.00 0.01 6.575 A B-A 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.00 70.70 0.014 0.00 0.01 12.906 B C-AB 2.00 2.00 1.98 0.00 133.43 0.015 0.00 0.02 6.847 A C-A 182.53 182.53 182.53 0.00 ------A-B 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 ------A-C 168.59 168.59 168.59 0.00 ------

Main results: (08:15-08:30)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-C 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 132.08 0.015 0.01 0.02 6.917 A B-A 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 59.54 0.017 0.01 0.02 15.375 C C-AB 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 127.06 0.016 0.02 0.02 7.195 A C-A 225.54 225.54 225.54 0.00 ------A-B 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 ------A-C 196.35 196.35 196.35 0.00 ------

Main results: (08:30-08:45)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-C 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 143.65 0.014 0.02 0.01 6.355 A B-A 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 71.98 0.014 0.02 0.01 12.683 B C-AB 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 138.14 0.014 0.02 0.01 6.612 A C-A 205.60 205.60 205.60 0.00 ------A-B 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 ------A-C 148.03 148.03 148.03 0.00 ------

6 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Main results: (08:45-09:00)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-C 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 140.24 0.014 0.01 0.01 6.509 A B-A 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 70.78 0.014 0.01 0.01 12.897 B C-AB 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 134.84 0.015 0.01 0.01 6.774 A C-A 191.97 191.97 191.97 0.00 ------A-B 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 ------A-C 162.42 162.42 162.42 0.00 ------

Queueing Delay Results for each time segment

Queueing Delay results: (08:00-08:15)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-C 0.21 0.01 6.575 A A B-A 0.20 0.01 12.906 B B C-AB 0.22 0.01 6.847 A A C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (08:15-08:30)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-C 0.23 0.02 6.917 A A B-A 0.25 0.02 15.375 C B C-AB 0.24 0.02 7.195 A A C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (08:30-08:45)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-C 0.22 0.01 6.355 A A B-A 0.22 0.01 12.683 B B C-AB 0.22 0.01 6.612 A A C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (08:45-09:00)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-C 0.22 0.01 6.509 A A B-A 0.21 0.01 12.897 B B C-AB 0.23 0.02 6.774 A A C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

7 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Proposed Site Access Junction - 2016 Uplifted Baseline with Proposed Development, PM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Demand Set Details

Model Results Model Model Time Single Time Traffic Time For Scenario Start Finish Segment Time Run Use Name Period Description Profile Period Central Locked Name Time Time Length Segment Automatically Relationship Name Type Length Hour (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) Only (min) Only 2016 2016 Uplifted Uplifted Baseline with Baseline Proposed PM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 with ü Development, Proposed PM Development

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Major Road Direction Arm Order Do Geometric Delay Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) T-Junction Two-way A,B,C 13.69 B

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Left Normal/unknown

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description Arm Type A A Victoria Road (e) Major B B Site Access Minor C C Victoria Road (w) Major

Major Arm Geometry

8 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Minor Arm Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Priority Intersection Slopes and Intercepts Slope Slope Slope Slope Intercept Junction Stream for for for for (PCU/TS) A-B A-C C-A C-B 1 B-A 136.995 0.086 0.216 0.136 0.309 1 B-C 170.234 0.089 0.226 - - 1 C-B 172.534 0.229 0.229 - - The slopes and intercepts shown above do NOT include any corrections or adjustments. Streams may be combined, in which case capacity will be adjusted. Values are shown for the first time segment only; they may differ for subsequent time segments.

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (Veh/TS) Flow Scaling Factor (%) A DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 B DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 C DIRECT ü N/A 100.000

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (17:00-17:15) To A B C A 0.000 4.000 201.000 From B 9.000 0.000 9.000 C 260.000 8.000 0.000

9 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (17:00-17:15) To A B C A 0.00 0.02 0.98 From B 0.50 0.00 0.50 C 0.97 0.03 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (17:15-17:30) To A B C A 0.000 4.000 212.000 From B 9.000 0.000 9.000 C 218.000 8.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (17:15-17:30) To A B C A 0.00 0.02 0.98 From B 0.50 0.00 0.50 C 0.96 0.04 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (17:30-17:45) To A B C A 0.000 4.000 240.000 From B 9.000 0.000 9.000 C 243.000 8.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (17:30-17:45) To A B C A 0.00 0.02 0.98 From B 0.50 0.00 0.50 C 0.97 0.03 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (17:45-18:00) To A B C A 0.000 4.000 217.000 From B 9.000 0.000 9.000 C 218.000 8.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (17:45-18:00) To A B C A 0.00 0.02 0.98 From B 0.50 0.00 0.50 C 0.96 0.04 0.00

10 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 1.000 1.000 1.009 From B 1.000 1.000 1.000 C 1.031 1.000 1.000

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.0 0.0 0.9 From B 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 3.1 0.0 0.0

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Total Total Inclusive Max Max Average Average Rate Of Inclusive Total Max Max Junction Queueing Average Stream Delay Queue Demand Queueing Queueing Delay Queueing Delay RFC LOS Arrivals Delay (PCU- Queueing Delay (s) (PCU) (PCU/TS) Delay (s) (PCU-min/min) (PCU-min) (PCU) min) (s) B-C 0.08 8.96 0.09 A 9.00 36.00 5.02 8.37 0.08 5.02 8.37 B-A 0.19 23.18 0.23 C 9.00 36.00 11.87 19.78 0.20 11.87 19.79 C-AB 0.07 8.32 0.07 A 8.00 32.00 4.22 7.91 0.07 4.22 7.91 C-A - - - - 242.03 968.11 - - - - - A-B - - - - 4.00 16.00 - - - - - A-C - - - - 219.46 877.83 - - - - -

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (17:00-17:15)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-C 9.00 9.00 8.92 0.00 118.81 0.076 0.00 0.08 8.184 A B-A 9.00 9.00 8.80 0.00 53.85 0.167 0.00 0.20 19.899 C C-AB 8.00 8.00 7.93 0.00 125.13 0.064 0.00 0.07 7.676 A C-A 268.06 268.06 268.06 0.00 ------A-B 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 ------A-C 202.81 202.81 202.81 0.00 ------

11 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Main results: (17:15-17:30)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-C 9.00 9.00 9.00 0.00 116.50 0.077 0.08 0.08 8.372 A B-A 9.00 9.00 9.01 0.00 57.38 0.157 0.20 0.19 18.612 C C-AB 8.00 8.00 8.00 0.00 122.58 0.065 0.07 0.07 7.854 A C-A 224.76 224.76 224.76 0.00 ------A-B 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 ------A-C 213.91 213.91 213.91 0.00 ------

Main results: (17:30-17:45)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-C 9.00 9.00 8.99 0.00 109.44 0.082 0.08 0.09 8.960 A B-A 9.00 9.00 8.96 0.00 47.74 0.189 0.19 0.23 23.180 C C-AB 8.00 8.00 8.00 0.00 116.10 0.069 0.07 0.07 8.324 A C-A 250.53 250.53 250.53 0.00 ------A-B 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 ------A-C 242.16 242.16 242.16 0.00 ------

Main results: (17:45-18:00)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-C 9.00 9.00 9.00 0.00 115.27 0.078 0.09 0.09 8.471 A B-A 9.00 9.00 9.03 0.00 56.29 0.160 0.23 0.19 19.058 C C-AB 8.00 8.00 8.00 0.00 121.42 0.066 0.07 0.07 7.936 A C-A 224.76 224.76 224.76 0.00 ------A-B 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 ------A-C 218.95 218.95 218.95 0.00 ------

Queueing Delay Results for each time segment

Queueing Delay results: (17:00-17:15)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-C 1.17 0.08 8.184 A A B-A 2.72 0.18 19.899 C B C-AB 1.01 0.07 7.676 A A C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (17:15-17:30)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-C 1.24 0.08 8.372 A A B-A 2.87 0.19 18.612 C B C-AB 1.05 0.07 7.854 A A C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

12 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Queueing Delay results: (17:30-17:45)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-C 1.31 0.09 8.960 A A B-A 3.27 0.22 23.180 C C C-AB 1.11 0.07 8.324 A A C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (17:45-18:00)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-C 1.29 0.09 8.471 A A B-A 3.01 0.20 19.058 C B C-AB 1.06 0.07 7.936 A A C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Proposed Site Access Junction - 2016 Uplifted Baseline with Proposed Development, Sat

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Demand Set Details

Model Results Model Model Time Single Time Traffic Time For Scenario Start Finish Segment Time Run Use Name Period Description Profile Period Central Locked Name Time Time Length Segment Automatically Relationship Name Type Length Hour (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) Only (min) Only 2016 2016 Uplifted Uplifted Baseline with Baseline Proposed Sat DIRECT 14:00 15:00 60 15 with ü Development, Proposed Sat Development

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Major Road Direction Arm Order Do Geometric Delay Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) T-Junction Two-way A,B,C 15.11 C

13 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Left Normal/unknown

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description Arm Type A A Victoria Road (e) Major B B Site Access Minor C C Victoria Road (w) Major

Major Arm Geometry

Minor Arm Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Priority Intersection Slopes and Intercepts Slope Slope Slope Slope Intercept Junction Stream for for for for (PCU/TS) A-B A-C C-A C-B 1 B-A 131.970 0.082 0.208 0.131 0.298 1 B-C 176.479 0.093 0.234 - - 1 C-B 172.534 0.229 0.229 - - The slopes and intercepts shown above do NOT include any corrections or adjustments. Streams may be combined, in which case capacity will be adjusted. Values are shown for the first time segment only; they may differ for subsequent time segments.

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

14 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (Veh/TS) Flow Scaling Factor (%) A DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 B DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 C DIRECT ü N/A 100.000

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (14:00-14:15) To A B C A 0.000 5.000 267.000 From B 9.000 0.000 14.000 C 263.000 16.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (14:00-14:15) To A B C A 0.00 0.02 0.98 From B 0.39 0.00 0.61 C 0.94 0.06 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (14:15-14:30) To A B C A 0.000 5.000 221.000 From B 9.000 0.000 14.000 C 277.000 16.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (14:15-14:30) To A B C A 0.00 0.02 0.98 From B 0.39 0.00 0.61 C 0.95 0.05 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (14:30-14:45) To A B C A 0.000 5.000 265.000 From B 9.000 0.000 14.000 C 245.000 16.000 0.000

15 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (14:30-14:45) To A B C A 0.00 0.02 0.98 From B 0.39 0.00 0.61 C 0.94 0.06 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (14:45-15:00) To A B C A 0.000 5.000 248.000 From B 9.000 0.000 14.000 C 238.000 16.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (14:45-15:00) To A B C A 0.00 0.02 0.98 From B 0.39 0.00 0.61 C 0.94 0.06 0.00

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 1.000 1.000 1.011 From B 1.000 1.000 1.000 C 1.017 1.000 1.000

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.0 0.0 1.1 From B 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 1.7 0.0 0.0

16 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Total Total Inclusive Max Max Average Average Rate Of Inclusive Total Max Max Junction Queueing Average Stream Delay Queue Demand Queueing Queueing Delay Queueing Delay RFC LOS Arrivals Delay (PCU- Queueing Delay (s) (PCU) (PCU/TS) Delay (s) (PCU-min/min) (PCU-min) (PCU) min) (s) B-C 0.13 9.80 0.15 A 14.00 56.00 8.70 9.32 0.14 8.70 9.32 B-A 0.25 33.19 0.32 D 9.00 36.00 17.09 28.49 0.28 17.11 28.51 C-AB 0.15 9.59 0.17 A 16.00 64.00 9.82 9.20 0.16 9.82 9.20 C-A - - - - 260.10 1040.39 - - - - - A-B - - - - 5.00 20.00 - - - - - A-C - - - - 253.00 1012.01 - - - - -

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (14:00-14:15)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-C 14.00 14.00 13.85 0.00 105.51 0.133 0.00 0.15 9.803 A B-A 9.00 9.00 8.68 0.00 35.50 0.254 0.00 0.32 33.192 D C-AB 16.00 16.00 15.83 0.00 109.51 0.146 0.00 0.17 9.590 A C-A 267.47 267.47 267.47 0.00 ------A-B 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 ------A-C 269.94 269.94 269.94 0.00 ------

Main results: (14:15-14:30)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-C 14.00 14.00 14.01 0.00 116.72 0.120 0.15 0.14 8.763 A B-A 9.00 9.00 9.05 0.00 43.36 0.208 0.32 0.27 26.280 D C-AB 16.00 16.00 16.01 0.00 120.17 0.133 0.17 0.16 8.641 A C-A 281.71 281.71 281.71 0.00 ------A-B 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 ------A-C 223.43 223.43 223.43 0.00 ------

Main results: (14:30-14:45)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-C 14.00 14.00 13.99 0.00 106.14 0.132 0.14 0.15 9.765 A B-A 9.00 9.00 8.97 0.00 38.33 0.235 0.27 0.30 30.610 D C-AB 16.00 16.00 15.99 0.00 109.97 0.145 0.16 0.17 9.575 A C-A 249.16 249.16 249.16 0.00 ------A-B 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 ------A-C 267.92 267.92 267.92 0.00 ------

17 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:27:01 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Main results: (14:45-15:00)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-C 14.00 14.00 14.00 0.00 110.65 0.127 0.15 0.15 9.314 A B-A 9.00 9.00 9.02 0.00 42.86 0.210 0.30 0.27 26.627 D C-AB 16.00 16.00 16.00 0.00 113.91 0.140 0.17 0.16 9.194 A C-A 242.05 242.05 242.05 0.00 ------A-B 5.00 5.00 5.00 0.00 ------A-C 250.73 250.73 250.73 0.00 ------

Queueing Delay Results for each time segment

Queueing Delay results: (14:00-14:15)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-C 2.17 0.14 9.803 A A B-A 4.34 0.29 33.192 D C C-AB 2.50 0.17 9.590 A A C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (14:15-14:30)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-C 2.10 0.14 8.763 A A B-A 4.22 0.28 26.280 D C C-AB 2.31 0.15 8.641 A A C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (14:30-14:45)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-C 2.22 0.15 9.765 A A B-A 4.34 0.29 30.610 D C C-AB 2.54 0.17 9.575 A A C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (14:45-15:00)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-C 2.21 0.15 9.314 A A B-A 4.20 0.28 26.627 D C C-AB 2.45 0.16 9.194 A A C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

APPENDIX K JUNCTIONS 8 PICADY Outputs – Stonefield Way/Victoria Road

Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Filename: 13-0917 Stonefield Way Victoria Road Picady.arc8 Path: P:\2013\13-0917 lidl sth ruislip\Analysis\Picady\13-0917 April 2015 Comments Junctions 8 modelling Report generation date: 23/04/2015 17:25:31

» Permitted Junction Layout - 2016 Baseline with Permitted Development, AM » Permitted Junction Layout - 2016 Baseline with Permitted Development, PM » Permitted Junction Layout - 2016 Baseline with Permitted Development, Sat

Summary of junction performance

AM PM Sat Junction Junction Jun Queue Delay Queue Delay Queue Delay RFC LOS Delay RFC LOS Delay RFC LOS De (PCU) (s) (PCU) (s) (PCU) (s) (s) (s) ( Permitted Junction Layout - 2016 Baseline with Permitted Development Stream B-AC 0.03 15.96 0.03 C 0.43 30.95 0.31 D 0.73 51.92 0.45 F Stream C-AB 0.36 11.81 0.26 B 0.42 12.37 0.29 B 0.15 11.79 0.13 B Stream C-A - - - - 12.13 - - - - 20.03 - - - - 33 Stream A-B ------Stream A-C ------

Values shown are the maximum values over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle. Junction LOS and Junction Delay are demand- weighted averages.

"D1 - 2016 Baseline with Proposed Development, AM" model duration: 08:00 - 09:00 "D2 - 2016 Baseline with Proposed Development, PM" model duration: 17:00 - 18:00 "D3 - 2016 Baseline with Proposed Development, Sat" model duration: 14:00 - 15:00 "D4 - 2016 Baseline with Permitted Development, AM " model duration: 08:00 - 09:00 "D5 - 2016 Baseline with Permitted Development, PM" model duration: 17:00 - 18:00 "D6 - 2016 Baseline with Permitted Development, Sat" model duration: 14:00 - 15:00

Run using Junctions 8.0.4.487 at 23/04/2015 17:25:31

1 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

File summary

Title Victoria Road/Stonefield Way Junction Location South Ruislip Site Number Date 23/04/2015 Version Status (new file) Identifier Client Jobnumber Enumerator Gateway TSP Description

Analysis Options

Vehicle Length Do Queue Calculate Residual Residual Capacity Criteria RFC Average Delay Threshold Queue Threshold (m) Variations Capacity Type Threshold (s) (PCU) 5.75 N/A 0.85 36.00 20.00

Units

Distance Units Speed Units Traffic Units Input Traffic Units Results Flow Units Average Delay Units Total Delay Units Rate Of Delay Units m kph Veh PCU perTimeSegment s -Min perMin

Permitted Junction Layout - 2016 Baseline with Permitted Development, AM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Specific Network Flow Reason For Roundabout Include In Use Specific Network Capacity Name Description Demand Set Locked Scaling Factor Scaling Capacity Model Report Demand Set(s) Scaling Factor (%) (s) (%) Factors Permitted Junction N/A ü 100.000 100.000 Layout

Demand Set Details

Model Results Model Model Time Single Time Traffic Time For Scenario Start Finish Segment Time Run Use Name Period Description Profile Period Central Locked Name Time Time Length Segment Automatically Relationship Name Type Length Hour (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) Only (min) Only 2016 2016 Baseline with Baseline Permitted with AM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 ü Development, Permitted AM Development

2 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Major Road Direction Arm Order Do Geometric Delay Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) T-Junction Two-way A,B,C 12.13 B

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Left Normal/unknown

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description Arm Type A A Victoria Road (e) Major B B Stonefield Way Minor C C Victoria Road (w) Major

Major Arm Geometry

Width of Has kerbed central Width of kerbed central Has right Width For Right Visibility For Right Blocking Queue Arm Blocks? carriageway (m) reserve reserve (m) turn bay Turn (m) Turn (m) (PCU) C 6.00 0.00 ü 3.10 48.00 ü 7.27 Geometries for Arm C are measured opposite Arm B. Geometries for Arm A (if relevant) are measured opposite Arm D.

Minor Arm Geometry

Minor Lane Lane Lane Width at Estimate Flare Width at Width at Width at Width at Visibility To Visibility To Arm Arm Width Width Width give-way Flare Length 5m (m) 10m (m) 15m (m) 20m (m) Left (m) Right (m) Type (m) (Left) (m) (Right) (m) (m) Length (PCU) One B 3.50 18 17 lane

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Priority Intersection Slopes and Intercepts Slope Slope Slope Slope Intercept Junction Stream for for for for (PCU/TS) A-B A-C C-A C-B 1 B-A 129.109 0.094 0.238 0.150 0.340 1 B-C 166.602 0.102 0.258 - - 1 C-B 165.176 0.256 0.256 - - The slopes and intercepts shown above do NOT include any corrections or adjustments. Streams may be combined, in which case capacity will be adjusted. Values are shown for the first time segment only; they may differ for subsequent time segments.

3 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (Veh/TS) Flow Scaling Factor (%) A DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 B DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 C DIRECT ü N/A 100.000

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (08:00-08:15) To A B C A 0.000 31.000 164.000 From B 1.000 0.000 1.000 C 147.000 28.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (08:00-08:15) To A B C A 0.00 0.16 0.84 From B 0.50 0.00 0.50 C 0.84 0.16 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (08:15-08:30) To A B C A 0.000 33.000 192.000 From B 1.000 0.000 1.000 C 189.000 27.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (08:15-08:30) To A B C A 0.00 0.15 0.85 From B 0.50 0.00 0.50 C 0.88 0.13 0.00

4 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (08:30-08:45) To A B C A 0.000 29.000 144.000 From B 1.000 0.000 1.000 C 173.000 24.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (08:30-08:45) To A B C A 0.00 0.17 0.83 From B 0.50 0.00 0.50 C 0.88 0.12 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (08:45-09:00) To A B C A 0.000 41.000 158.000 From B 1.000 0.000 1.000 C 168.000 17.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (08:45-09:00) To A B C A 0.00 0.21 0.79 From B 0.50 0.00 0.50 C 0.91 0.09 0.00

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 1.000 1.107 1.028 From B 1.000 1.000 1.000 C 1.053 1.021 1.000

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.0 10.7 2.8 From B 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 5.3 2.1 0.0

5 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Total Total Inclusive Max Max Average Average Rate Of Inclusive Total Max Max Junction Queueing Average Stream Delay Queue Demand Queueing Queueing Delay Queueing Delay RFC LOS Arrivals Delay (PCU- Queueing Delay (s) (PCU) (PCU/TS) Delay (s) (PCU-min/min) (PCU-min) (PCU) min) (s) B-AC 0.03 15.96 0.03 C 2.00 8.00 1.73 12.98 0.03 1.73 12.98 C-AB 0.26 11.81 0.36 B 24.51 98.02 17.30 10.59 0.29 17.30 10.59 C-A - - - - 178.22 712.87 - - - - - A-B - - - - 37.08 148.34 - - - - - A-C - - - - 169.11 676.42 - - - - -

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (08:00-08:15)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 2.00 2.00 1.97 0.00 73.38 0.027 0.00 0.03 12.603 B C-AB 28.59 28.59 28.25 0.00 113.24 0.252 0.00 0.34 10.770 B C-A 154.79 154.79 154.79 0.00 ------A-B 34.32 34.32 34.32 0.00 ------A-C 168.59 168.59 168.59 0.00 ------

Main results: (08:15-08:30)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 2.00 2.00 1.99 0.00 58.39 0.034 0.03 0.03 15.956 C C-AB 27.57 27.57 27.55 0.00 105.31 0.262 0.34 0.36 11.815 B C-A 199.01 199.01 199.01 0.00 ------A-B 36.53 36.53 36.53 0.00 ------A-C 197.38 197.38 197.38 0.00 ------

Main results: (08:30-08:45)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 2.00 2.00 2.01 0.00 76.60 0.026 0.03 0.03 12.068 B C-AB 24.50 24.50 24.59 0.00 119.06 0.206 0.36 0.27 9.735 A C-A 182.17 182.17 182.17 0.00 ------A-B 32.10 32.10 32.10 0.00 ------A-C 148.03 148.03 148.03 0.00 ------

6 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Main results: (08:45-09:00)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 74.28 0.027 0.03 0.03 12.451 B C-AB 17.36 17.36 17.44 0.00 111.98 0.155 0.27 0.19 9.727 A C-A 176.90 176.90 176.90 0.00 ------A-B 45.39 45.39 45.39 0.00 ------A-C 162.42 162.42 162.42 0.00 ------

Queueing Delay Results for each time segment

Queueing Delay results: (08:00-08:15)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 0.39 0.03 12.603 B B C-AB 5.01 0.33 10.770 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (08:15-08:30)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 0.51 0.03 15.956 C B C-AB 5.41 0.36 11.815 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (08:30-08:45)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 0.42 0.03 12.068 B B C-AB 4.03 0.27 9.735 A A C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (08:45-09:00)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 0.41 0.03 12.451 B B C-AB 2.85 0.19 9.727 A A C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

7 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Permitted Junction Layout - 2016 Baseline with Permitted Development, PM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Demand Set Details

Model Results Model Model Time Single Time Traffic Time For Scenario Start Finish Segment Time Run Use Name Period Description Profile Period Central Locked Name Time Time Length Segment Automatically Relationship Name Type Length Hour (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) Only (min) Only 2016 2016 Baseline with Baseline Permitted with PM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 ü Development, Permitted PM Development

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Major Road Direction Arm Order Do Geometric Delay Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) T-Junction Two-way A,B,C 20.03 C

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Left Normal/unknown

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description Arm Type A A Victoria Road (e) Major B B Stonefield Way Minor C C Victoria Road (w) Major

Major Arm Geometry

Width of Has kerbed central Width of kerbed central Has right Width For Right Visibility For Right Blocking Queue Arm Blocks? carriageway (m) reserve reserve (m) turn bay Turn (m) Turn (m) (PCU) C 6.00 0.00 ü 3.10 48.00 ü 7.27 Geometries for Arm C are measured opposite Arm B. Geometries for Arm A (if relevant) are measured opposite Arm D.

8 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Minor Arm Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (Veh/TS) Flow Scaling Factor (%) A DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 B DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 C DIRECT ü N/A 100.000

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (17:00-17:15) To A B C A 0.000 24.000 201.000 From B 8.000 0.000 5.000 C 235.000 29.000 0.000

9 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (17:00-17:15) To A B C A 0.00 0.11 0.89 From B 0.62 0.00 0.38 C 0.89 0.11 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (17:15-17:30) To A B C A 0.000 22.000 213.000 From B 8.000 0.000 5.000 C 202.000 21.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (17:15-17:30) To A B C A 0.00 0.09 0.91 From B 0.62 0.00 0.38 C 0.91 0.09 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (17:30-17:45) To A B C A 0.000 12.000 241.000 From B 8.000 0.000 5.000 C 240.000 7.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (17:30-17:45) To A B C A 0.00 0.05 0.95 From B 0.62 0.00 0.38 C 0.97 0.03 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (17:45-18:00) To A B C A 0.000 12.000 217.000 From B 8.000 0.000 5.000 C 210.000 13.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (17:45-18:00) To A B C A 0.00 0.05 0.95 From B 0.62 0.00 0.38 C 0.94 0.06 0.00

10 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 1.000 1.029 1.009 From B 1.000 1.000 1.000 C 1.028 1.059 1.000

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.0 2.9 0.9 From B 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 2.8 5.9 0.0

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Total Total Inclusive Max Max Average Average Rate Of Inclusive Total Max Max Junction Queueing Average Stream Delay Queue Demand Queueing Queueing Delay Queueing Delay RFC LOS Arrivals Delay (PCU- Queueing Delay (s) (PCU) (PCU/TS) Delay (s) (PCU-min/min) (PCU-min) (PCU) min) (s) B-AC 0.31 30.95 0.43 D 13.00 52.00 22.66 26.15 0.38 22.68 26.17 C-AB 0.29 12.37 0.42 B 18.54 74.14 14.20 11.49 0.24 14.20 11.49 C-A - - - - 227.96 911.82 - - - - - A-B - - - - 18.01 72.03 - - - - - A-C - - - - 219.96 879.85 - - - - -

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (17:00-17:15)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 13.00 13.00 12.60 0.00 44.11 0.295 0.00 0.40 28.235 D C-AB 30.72 30.72 30.31 0.00 106.97 0.287 0.00 0.42 12.367 B C-A 241.57 241.57 241.57 0.00 ------A-B 24.70 24.70 24.70 0.00 ------A-C 202.81 202.81 202.81 0.00 ------

11 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Main results: (17:15-17:30)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 13.00 13.00 13.04 0.00 49.73 0.261 0.40 0.36 24.562 C C-AB 22.24 22.24 22.37 0.00 104.37 0.213 0.42 0.29 11.640 B C-A 207.65 207.65 207.65 0.00 ------A-B 22.64 22.64 22.64 0.00 ------A-C 214.92 214.92 214.92 0.00 ------

Main results: (17:30-17:45)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 13.00 13.00 12.93 0.00 41.93 0.310 0.36 0.43 30.948 D C-AB 7.41 7.41 7.62 0.00 99.77 0.074 0.29 0.09 10.364 B C-A 246.72 246.72 246.72 0.00 ------A-B 12.35 12.35 12.35 0.00 ------A-C 243.17 243.17 243.17 0.00 ------

Main results: (17:45-18:00)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 13.00 13.00 13.09 0.00 51.66 0.252 0.43 0.35 23.385 C C-AB 13.77 13.77 13.70 0.00 105.96 0.130 0.09 0.16 10.322 B C-A 215.88 215.88 215.88 0.00 ------A-B 12.35 12.35 12.35 0.00 ------A-C 218.95 218.95 218.95 0.00 ------

Queueing Delay Results for each time segment

Queueing Delay results: (17:00-17:15)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 5.41 0.36 28.235 D C C-AB 6.16 0.41 12.367 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (17:15-17:30)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 5.60 0.37 24.562 C C C-AB 4.39 0.29 11.640 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

12 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Queueing Delay results: (17:30-17:45)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 6.21 0.41 30.948 D C C-AB 1.31 0.09 10.364 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (17:45-18:00)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 5.43 0.36 23.385 C C C-AB 2.33 0.16 10.322 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Permitted Junction Layout - 2016 Baseline with Permitted Development, Sat

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Demand Set Details

Model Results Model Model Time Single Time Traffic Time For Scenario Start Finish Segment Time Run Use Name Period Description Profile Period Central Locked Name Time Time Length Segment Automatically Relationship Name Type Length Hour (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) Only (min) Only 2016 2016 Baseline with Baseline Permitted with Sat DIRECT 14:00 15:00 60 15 ü Development, Permitted Sat Development

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Major Road Direction Arm Order Do Geometric Delay Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) T-Junction Two-way A,B,C 33.53 D

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Left Normal/unknown

13 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description Arm Type A A Victoria Road (e) Major B B Stonefield Way Minor C C Victoria Road (w) Major

Major Arm Geometry

Width of Has kerbed central Width of kerbed central Has right Width For Right Visibility For Right Blocking Queue Arm Blocks? carriageway (m) reserve reserve (m) turn bay Turn (m) Turn (m) (PCU) C 6.00 0.00 ü 3.10 48.00 ü 7.27 Geometries for Arm C are measured opposite Arm B. Geometries for Arm A (if relevant) are measured opposite Arm D.

Minor Arm Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

14 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (Veh/TS) Flow Scaling Factor (%) A DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 B DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 C DIRECT ü N/A 100.000

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (14:00-14:15) To A B C A 0.000 19.000 266.000 From B 8.000 0.000 5.000 C 258.000 11.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (14:00-14:15) To A B C A 0.00 0.07 0.93 From B 0.62 0.00 0.38 C 0.96 0.04 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (14:15-14:30) To A B C A 0.000 18.000 221.000 From B 8.000 0.000 5.000 C 273.000 10.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (14:15-14:30) To A B C A 0.00 0.08 0.92 From B 0.62 0.00 0.38 C 0.96 0.04 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (14:30-14:45) To A B C A 0.000 12.000 264.000 From B 8.000 0.000 5.000 C 240.000 11.000 0.000

15 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (14:30-14:45) To A B C A 0.00 0.04 0.96 From B 0.62 0.00 0.38 C 0.96 0.04 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (14:45-15:00) To A B C A 0.000 10.000 248.000 From B 8.000 0.000 5.000 C 233.000 10.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (14:45-15:00) To A B C A 0.00 0.04 0.96 From B 0.62 0.00 0.38 C 0.96 0.04 0.00

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 1.000 1.052 1.011 From B 1.000 1.000 1.000 C 1.015 1.048 1.000

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.0 5.2 1.1 From B 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 1.5 4.8 0.0

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Total Total Inclusive Max Max Average Average Rate Of Inclusive Total Max Max Junction Queueing Average Stream Delay Queue Demand Queueing Queueing Delay Queueing Delay RFC LOS Arrivals Delay (PCU- Queueing Delay (s) (PCU) (PCU/TS) Delay (s) (PCU-min/min) (PCU-min) (PCU) min) (s) B-AC 0.45 51.92 0.73 F 13.00 52.00 33.44 38.59 0.56 33.49 38.64 C-AB 0.13 11.79 0.15 B 11.00 44.02 8.08 11.02 0.13 8.08 11.02 C-A - - - - 254.76 1019.06 - - - - - A-B - - - - 15.52 62.07 - - - - - A-C - - - - 252.50 1009.99 - - - - -

16 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (14:00-14:15)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 13.00 13.00 12.27 0.00 28.99 0.448 0.00 0.73 51.925 F C-AB 11.53 11.53 11.38 0.00 91.22 0.126 0.00 0.15 11.793 B C-A 261.87 261.87 261.87 0.00 ------A-B 19.99 19.99 19.99 0.00 ------A-C 268.93 268.93 268.93 0.00 ------

Main results: (14:15-14:30)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 13.00 13.00 13.24 0.00 40.48 0.321 0.73 0.50 33.325 D C-AB 10.48 10.48 10.51 0.00 103.13 0.102 0.15 0.12 10.188 B C-A 277.10 277.10 277.10 0.00 ------A-B 18.94 18.94 18.94 0.00 ------A-C 223.43 223.43 223.43 0.00 ------

Main results: (14:30-14:45)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 13.00 13.00 12.91 0.00 33.84 0.384 0.50 0.59 42.739 E C-AB 11.53 11.53 11.50 0.00 93.62 0.123 0.12 0.15 11.482 B C-A 243.60 243.60 243.60 0.00 ------A-B 12.62 12.62 12.62 0.00 ------A-C 266.90 266.90 266.90 0.00 ------

Main results: (14:45-15:00)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 13.00 13.00 13.10 0.00 40.55 0.321 0.59 0.49 32.915 D C-AB 10.48 10.48 10.50 0.00 98.30 0.107 0.15 0.13 10.744 B C-A 236.50 236.50 236.50 0.00 ------A-B 10.52 10.52 10.52 0.00 ------A-C 250.73 250.73 250.73 0.00 ------

Queueing Delay Results for each time segment

Queueing Delay results: (14:00-14:15)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 9.29 0.62 51.925 F D C-AB 2.21 0.15 11.793 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

17 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:25:35 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Queueing Delay results: (14:15-14:30)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 8.00 0.53 33.325 D C C-AB 1.80 0.12 10.188 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (14:30-14:45)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 8.42 0.56 42.739 E D C-AB 2.19 0.15 11.482 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (14:45-15:00)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 7.73 0.52 32.915 D C C-AB 1.89 0.13 10.744 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

18 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

» Permitted Junction Layout - 2016 Baseline with Proposed Development, AM » Permitted Junction Layout - 2016 Baseline with Proposed Development, PM » Permitted Junction Layout - 2016 Baseline with Proposed Development, Sat

Summary of junction performance

AM PM Sat Junction Junction Jun Queue Delay Queue Delay Queue Delay RFC LOS Delay RFC LOS Delay RFC LOS De (PCU) (s) (PCU) (s) (PCU) (s) (s) (s) ( Permitted Junction Layout - 2016 Baseline with Proposed Development Stream B-AC 0.00 0.00 0.00 A 0.11 33.69 0.10 D 0.53 70.84 0.37 F Stream C-AB 0.34 11.73 0.25 B 0.36 12.18 0.25 B 0.07 12.01 0.06 B Stream C-A - - - - 11.73 - - - - 15.91 - - - - 46 Stream A-B ------Stream A-C ------

Values shown are the maximum values over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle. Junction LOS and Junction Delay are demand- weighted averages.

"D1 - 2016 Baseline with Proposed Development, AM " model duration: 08:00 - 09:00 "D2 - 2016 Baseline with Proposed Development, PM" model duration: 17:00 - 18:00 "D3 - 2016 Baseline with Proposed Development, Sat" model duration: 14:00 - 15:00 "D4 - 2016 Baseline with Permitted Development, AM" model duration: 08:00 - 09:00 "D5 - 2016 Baseline with Permitted Development, PM" model duration: 17:00 - 18:00 "D6 - 2016 Baseline with Permitted Development, Sat" model duration: 14:00 - 15:00

Run using Junctions 8.0.4.487 at 23/04/2015 17:16:50

1 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

File summary

Title Victoria Road/Stonefield Way Junction Location South Ruislip Site Number Date 23/04/2015 Version Status (new file) Identifier Client Jobnumber Enumerator Gateway TSP Description

Analysis Options

Vehicle Length Do Queue Calculate Residual Residual Capacity Criteria RFC Average Delay Threshold Queue Threshold (m) Variations Capacity Type Threshold (s) (PCU) 5.75 N/A 0.85 36.00 20.00

Units

Distance Units Speed Units Traffic Units Input Traffic Units Results Flow Units Average Delay Units Total Delay Units Rate Of Delay Units m kph Veh PCU perTimeSegment s -Min perMin

Permitted Junction Layout - 2016 Baseline with Proposed Development, AM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Demand Set Details

Model Results Model Model Time Single Time Traffic Time For Scenario Start Finish Segment Time Run Use Name Period Description Profile Period Central Locked Name Time Time Length Segment Automatically Relationship Name Type Length Hour (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) Only (min) Only 2016 2016 Baseline with Baseline Proposed with AM DIRECT 08:00 09:00 60 15 ü Development, Proposed AM Development

2 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Major Road Direction Arm Order Do Geometric Delay Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) T-Junction Two-way A,B,C 11.73 B

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Left Normal/unknown

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description Arm Type A A Victoria Road (e) Major B B Stonefield Way Minor C C Victoria Road (w) Major

Major Arm Geometry

Width of Has kerbed central Width of kerbed central Has right Width For Right Visibility For Right Blocking Queue Arm Blocks? carriageway (m) reserve reserve (m) turn bay Turn (m) Turn (m) (PCU) C 6.00 0.00 ü 3.10 48.00 ü 7.27 Geometries for Arm C are measured opposite Arm B. Geometries for Arm A (if relevant) are measured opposite Arm D.

Minor Arm Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

3 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (Veh/TS) Flow Scaling Factor (%) A DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 B DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 C DIRECT ü N/A 100.000

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (08:00-08:15) To A B C A 0.000 31.000 165.000 From B 0.000 0.000 0.000 C 149.000 27.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (08:00-08:15) To A B C A 0.00 0.16 0.84 From B 0.33 0.33 0.33 C 0.85 0.15 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (08:15-08:30) To A B C A 0.000 33.000 193.000 From B 0.000 0.000 0.000 C 191.000 26.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (08:15-08:30) To A B C A 0.00 0.15 0.85 From B 0.33 0.33 0.33 C 0.88 0.12 0.00

4 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (08:30-08:45) To A B C A 0.000 29.000 146.000 From B 0.000 0.000 0.000 C 175.000 23.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (08:30-08:45) To A B C A 0.00 0.17 0.83 From B 0.33 0.33 0.33 C 0.88 0.12 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (08:45-09:00) To A B C A 0.000 41.000 159.000 From B 0.000 0.000 0.000 C 170.000 15.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (08:45-09:00) To A B C A 0.00 0.21 0.80 From B 0.33 0.33 0.33 C 0.92 0.08 0.00

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 1.000 1.107 1.028 From B 1.000 1.000 1.000 C 1.052 1.023 1.000

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.0 10.7 2.8 From B 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 5.2 2.3 0.0

5 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Total Total Inclusive Max Max Average Average Rate Of Inclusive Total Max Max Junction Queueing Average Stream Delay Queue Demand Queueing Queueing Delay Queueing Delay RFC LOS Arrivals Delay (PCU- Queueing Delay (s) (PCU) (PCU/TS) Delay (s) (PCU-min/min) (PCU-min) (PCU) min) (s) B-AC 0.00 0.00 0.00 A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 C-AB 0.25 11.73 0.34 B 23.27 93.10 16.34 10.53 0.27 16.34 10.53 C-A - - - - 180.15 720.61 - - - - - A-B - - - - 37.08 148.34 - - - - - A-C - - - - 170.39 681.56 - - - - -

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (08:00-08:15)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.13 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 A C-AB 27.62 27.62 27.30 0.00 112.98 0.245 0.00 0.33 10.706 B C-A 156.75 156.75 156.75 0.00 ------A-B 34.32 34.32 34.32 0.00 ------A-C 169.62 169.62 169.62 0.00 ------

Main results: (08:15-08:30)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.14 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 A C-AB 26.60 26.60 26.58 0.00 105.04 0.253 0.33 0.34 11.732 B C-A 200.93 200.93 200.93 0.00 ------A-B 36.53 36.53 36.53 0.00 ------A-C 198.40 198.40 198.40 0.00 ------

Main results: (08:30-08:45)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 76.08 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 A C-AB 23.53 23.53 23.61 0.00 118.54 0.199 0.34 0.26 9.707 A C-A 184.10 184.10 184.10 0.00 ------A-B 32.10 32.10 32.10 0.00 ------A-C 150.09 150.09 150.09 0.00 ------

6 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Main results: (08:45-09:00)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.37 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 A C-AB 15.35 15.35 15.44 0.00 111.72 0.137 0.26 0.16 9.571 A C-A 178.84 178.84 178.84 0.00 ------A-B 45.39 45.39 45.39 0.00 ------A-C 163.45 163.45 163.45 0.00 ------

Queueing Delay Results for each time segment

Queueing Delay results: (08:00-08:15)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 0.00 0.00 0.000 A A C-AB 4.81 0.32 10.706 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (08:15-08:30)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 0.00 0.00 0.000 A A C-AB 5.18 0.35 11.732 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (08:30-08:45)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 0.00 0.00 0.000 A A C-AB 3.85 0.26 9.707 A A C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (08:45-09:00)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 0.00 0.00 0.000 A A C-AB 2.49 0.17 9.571 A A C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

7 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Permitted Junction Layout - 2016 Baseline with Proposed Development, PM

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Demand Set Details

Model Results Model Model Time Single Time Traffic Time For Scenario Start Finish Segment Time Run Use Name Period Description Profile Period Central Locked Name Time Time Length Segment Automatically Relationship Name Type Length Hour (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) Only (min) Only 2016 2016 Baseline with Baseline Proposed with PM DIRECT 17:00 18:00 60 15 ü Development, Proposed PM Development

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Major Road Direction Arm Order Do Geometric Delay Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) T-Junction Two-way A,B,C 15.91 C

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Left Normal/unknown

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description Arm Type A A Victoria Road (e) Major B B Stonefield Way Minor C C Victoria Road (w) Major

Major Arm Geometry

Width of Has kerbed central Width of kerbed central Has right Width For Right Visibility For Right Blocking Queue Arm Blocks? carriageway (m) reserve reserve (m) turn bay Turn (m) Turn (m) (PCU) C 6.00 0.00 ü 3.10 48.00 ü 7.27 Geometries for Arm C are measured opposite Arm B. Geometries for Arm A (if relevant) are measured opposite Arm D.

8 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Minor Arm Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (Veh/TS) Flow Scaling Factor (%) A DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 B DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 C DIRECT ü N/A 100.000

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (17:00-17:15) To A B C A 0.000 24.000 205.000 From B 3.000 0.000 0.000 C 245.000 25.000 0.000

9 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (17:00-17:15) To A B C A 0.00 0.10 0.90 From B 1.00 0.00 0.00 C 0.91 0.09 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (17:15-17:30) To A B C A 0.000 22.000 216.000 From B 3.000 0.000 0.000 C 212.000 17.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (17:15-17:30) To A B C A 0.00 0.09 0.91 From B 1.00 0.00 0.00 C 0.93 0.07 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (17:30-17:45) To A B C A 0.000 12.000 244.000 From B 3.000 0.000 0.000 C 251.000 3.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (17:30-17:45) To A B C A 0.00 0.05 0.95 From B 1.00 0.00 0.00 C 0.99 0.01 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (17:45-18:00) To A B C A 0.000 12.000 221.000 From B 3.000 0.000 0.000 C 221.000 8.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (17:45-18:00) To A B C A 0.00 0.05 0.95 From B 1.00 0.00 0.00 C 0.97 0.03 0.00

10 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 1.000 1.029 1.009 From B 1.000 1.000 1.000 C 1.027 1.078 1.000

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.0 2.9 0.9 From B 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 2.7 7.8 0.0

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Total Total Inclusive Max Max Average Average Rate Of Inclusive Total Max Max Junction Queueing Average Stream Delay Queue Demand Queueing Queueing Delay Queueing Delay RFC LOS Arrivals Delay (PCU- Queueing Delay (s) (PCU) (PCU/TS) Delay (s) (PCU-min/min) (PCU-min) (PCU) min) (s) B-AC 0.10 33.69 0.11 D 3.00 12.00 5.78 28.92 0.10 5.79 28.93 C-AB 0.25 12.18 0.36 B 14.29 57.14 10.86 11.41 0.18 10.86 11.41 C-A - - - - 238.52 954.08 - - - - - A-B - - - - 18.01 72.03 - - - - - A-C - - - - 223.49 893.97 - - - - -

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (17:00-17:15)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 3.00 3.00 2.90 0.00 30.82 0.097 0.00 0.10 32.119 D C-AB 26.96 26.96 26.59 0.00 105.92 0.254 0.00 0.36 12.177 B C-A 251.61 251.61 251.61 0.00 ------A-B 24.70 24.70 24.70 0.00 ------A-C 206.85 206.85 206.85 0.00 ------

11 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Main results: (17:15-17:30)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 3.00 3.00 3.01 0.00 36.25 0.083 0.10 0.09 27.089 D C-AB 18.33 18.33 18.45 0.00 103.59 0.177 0.36 0.24 11.411 B C-A 217.72 217.72 217.72 0.00 ------A-B 22.64 22.64 22.64 0.00 ------A-C 217.94 217.94 217.94 0.00 ------

Main results: (17:30-17:45)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 3.00 3.00 2.98 0.00 29.68 0.101 0.09 0.11 33.685 D C-AB 3.23 3.23 3.43 0.00 98.99 0.033 0.24 0.04 10.172 B C-A 257.78 257.78 257.78 0.00 ------A-B 12.35 12.35 12.35 0.00 ------A-C 246.20 246.20 246.20 0.00 ------

Main results: (17:45-18:00)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 3.00 3.00 3.02 0.00 38.04 0.079 0.11 0.09 25.717 D C-AB 8.62 8.62 8.57 0.00 104.93 0.082 0.04 0.10 10.061 B C-A 226.97 226.97 226.97 0.00 ------A-B 12.35 12.35 12.35 0.00 ------A-C 222.99 222.99 222.99 0.00 ------

Queueing Delay Results for each time segment

Queueing Delay results: (17:00-17:15)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 1.41 0.09 32.119 D C C-AB 5.33 0.36 12.177 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (17:15-17:30)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 1.43 0.10 27.089 D C C-AB 3.55 0.24 11.411 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

12 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Queueing Delay results: (17:30-17:45)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 1.57 0.10 33.685 D C C-AB 0.56 0.04 10.172 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (17:45-18:00)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 1.37 0.09 25.717 D C C-AB 1.42 0.09 10.061 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Permitted Junction Layout - 2016 Baseline with Proposed Development, Sat

Data Errors and Warnings No errors or warnings

Analysis Set Details

Demand Set Details

Model Results Model Model Time Single Time Traffic Time For Scenario Start Finish Segment Time Run Use Name Period Description Profile Period Central Locked Name Time Time Length Segment Automatically Relationship Name Type Length Hour (HH:mm) (HH:mm) (min) Only (min) Only 2016 2016 Baseline with Baseline Proposed with Sat DIRECT 14:00 15:00 60 15 ü Development, Proposed Sat Development

Junction Network

Junctions

Junction Name Junction Type Major Road Direction Arm Order Do Geometric Delay Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS 1 (untitled) T-Junction Two-way A,B,C 46.33 E

Junction Network Options

Driving Side Lighting Left Normal/unknown

13 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Arms

Arm Arm Name Description Arm Type A A Victoria Road (e) Major B B Stonefield Way Minor C C Victoria Road (w) Major

Major Arm Geometry

Width of Has kerbed central Width of kerbed central Has right Width For Right Visibility For Right Blocking Queue Arm Blocks? carriageway (m) reserve reserve (m) turn bay Turn (m) Turn (m) (PCU) C 6.00 0.00 ü 3.10 48.00 ü 7.27 Geometries for Arm C are measured opposite Arm B. Geometries for Arm A (if relevant) are measured opposite Arm D.

Minor Arm Geometry

Slope / Intercept / Capacity

Traffic Flows

Demand Set Data Options

14 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Entry Flows

General Flows Data

Arm Profile Type Use Turning Counts Average Demand Flow (Veh/TS) Flow Scaling Factor (%) A DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 B DIRECT ü N/A 100.000 C DIRECT ü N/A 100.000

Turning Proportions

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (14:00-14:15) To A B C A 0.000 23.000 272.000 From B 7.000 0.000 0.000 C 269.000 5.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (14:00-14:15) To A B C A 0.00 0.08 0.92 From B 1.00 0.00 0.00 C 0.98 0.02 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (14:15-14:30) To A B C A 0.000 22.000 227.000 From B 7.000 0.000 0.000 C 283.000 4.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (14:15-14:30) To A B C A 0.00 0.09 0.91 From B 1.00 0.00 0.00 C 0.99 0.01 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (14:30-14:45) To A B C A 0.000 16.000 270.000 From B 7.000 0.000 0.000 C 250.000 5.000 0.000

15 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (14:30-14:45) To A B C A 0.00 0.06 0.94 From B 1.00 0.00 0.00 C 0.98 0.02 0.00

Turning Counts / Proportions (Veh/ TS) - Junction 1 - (14:45-15:00) To A B C A 0.000 14.000 253.000 From B 7.000 0.000 0.000 C 244.000 4.000 0.000

Turning Proportions (Veh) - Junction 1 - (14:45-15:00) To A B C A 0.00 0.05 0.95 From B 1.00 0.00 0.00 C 0.98 0.02 0.00

Vehicle Mix

Average PCU Per Vehicle - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 1.000 1.041 1.011 From B 1.000 1.000 1.000 C 1.015 1.111 1.000

Heavy Vehicle Percentages - Junction 1 (for whole period) To A B C A 0.0 4.1 1.1 From B 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 1.5 11.1 0.0

Results

Results Summary for whole modelled period

Total Total Inclusive Max Max Average Average Rate Of Inclusive Total Max Max Junction Queueing Average Stream Delay Queue Demand Queueing Queueing Delay Queueing Delay RFC LOS Arrivals Delay (PCU- Queueing Delay (s) (PCU) (PCU/TS) Delay (s) (PCU-min/min) (PCU-min) (PCU) min) (s) B-AC 0.37 70.84 0.53 F 7.00 28.00 23.66 50.70 0.39 23.69 50.77 C-AB 0.06 12.01 0.07 B 5.00 20.00 3.75 11.26 0.06 3.75 11.26 C-A - - - - 265.42 1061.69 - - - - - A-B - - - - 19.52 78.08 - - - - - A-C - - - - 258.31 1033.24 - - - - -

16 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Main Results for each time segment

Main results: (14:00-14:15)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 7.00 7.00 6.47 0.00 18.75 0.373 0.00 0.53 70.844 F C-AB 5.56 5.56 5.48 0.00 88.65 0.063 0.00 0.07 12.013 B C-A 273.04 273.04 273.04 0.00 ------A-B 23.94 23.94 23.94 0.00 ------A-C 274.99 274.99 274.99 0.00 ------

Main results: (14:15-14:30)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 7.00 7.00 7.17 0.00 27.89 0.251 0.53 0.35 43.789 E C-AB 4.44 4.44 4.47 0.00 100.56 0.044 0.07 0.05 10.406 B C-A 287.25 287.25 287.25 0.00 ------A-B 22.90 22.90 22.90 0.00 ------A-C 229.50 229.50 229.50 0.00 ------

Main results: (14:30-14:45)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 7.00 7.00 6.94 0.00 22.78 0.307 0.35 0.42 56.477 F C-AB 5.56 5.56 5.54 0.00 91.03 0.061 0.05 0.07 11.692 B C-A 253.75 253.75 253.75 0.00 ------A-B 16.66 16.66 16.66 0.00 ------A-C 272.97 272.97 272.97 0.00 ------

Main results: (14:45-15:00)

Total Demand Junction Arrivals Entry Flow Pedestrian Demand Capacity Start Queue End Queue Delay Stream RFC LOS (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU/TS) (Ped/TS) (PCU/TS) (PCU) (PCU) (s) B-AC 7.00 7.00 7.07 0.00 28.35 0.247 0.42 0.34 42.469 E C-AB 4.44 4.44 4.46 0.00 95.97 0.046 0.07 0.05 10.928 B C-A 247.66 247.66 247.66 0.00 ------A-B 14.57 14.57 14.57 0.00 ------A-C 255.78 255.78 255.78 0.00 ------

Queueing Delay Results for each time segment

Queueing Delay results: (14:00-14:15)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 6.53 0.44 70.844 F E C-AB 1.08 0.07 12.013 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

17 Generated on 23/04/2015 17:16:54 using Junctions 8 (8.0.4.487)

Queueing Delay results: (14:15-14:30)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 5.75 0.38 43.789 E D C-AB 0.78 0.05 10.406 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (14:30-14:45)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 5.95 0.40 56.477 F E C-AB 1.07 0.07 11.692 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -

Queueing Delay results: (14:45-15:00)

Queueing Total Delay (PCU- Queueing Rate Of Delay (PCU- Average Delay Per Arriving Unsignalised Level Of Signalised Level Of Stream min) min/min) Vehicle (s) Service Service B-AC 5.43 0.36 42.469 E D C-AB 0.82 0.05 10.928 B B C-A - - - - - A-B - - - - - A-C - - - - -