DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Analyses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Analyses Final Environmental Impact Report Chapter 3 – Environmental Analyses Chapter 3 – Environmental Analyses South Station Expansion June 2016 Massachusetts Department of Transportation Chapter 3 – Environmental Analyses Final Environmental Impact Report This Page Intentionally Left Blank June 2016 South Station Expansion Massachusetts Department of Transportation Final Environmental Impact Report Chapter 3 – Environmental Analyses 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES 3.1. Introduction The Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) provided a complete description and analysis of the project and its alternatives. It includes a description of existing conditions and identification and analysis of potential impacts related to the physical, biological, chemical, economic, and social conditions of the project site, its immediate surroundings, and the region. It also provides a discussion of the project’s consistency with regulations pertaining to each area of potential impact. The project website provides links to the full DEIR document. Hyperlinks to each DEIR section are also provided in Appendix H, DEIR Web Links. This FEIR chapter responds to the Secretary’s Certificate by providing additional analyses of wetlands impacts; water quality and stormwater impacts; water use and wastewater impacts; climate change impacts; greenhouse gas impacts; and site contamination and hazardous materials. Proposed mitigation to avoid, reduce and/or minimize all impacts is discussed in this chapter as well. This FEIR chapter also summarizes environmental impacts identified in the DEIR related to the following: • Land use and property • Wetlands • Chapter 91 waterways and tidelands • Water quality and stormwater • Water use and wastewater • Traffic and transportation • Climate change adaptation • Air quality • Noise and vibration • Greenhouse gas emissions • Historic resources • Site contamination and hazardous materials • Construction impacts 3.2. Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts Table 3-1 provides a summary of potential environmental impacts including permanent, temporary, and construction-related impacts from the proposed project. These impacts were compared to the effects of the No Build Alternative in the year 2035, except where otherwise noted. Mitigated impacts are also included where appropriate. South Station Expansion June 2016 Massachusetts Department of Transportation Page 3-1 Chapter 3 – Environmental Analyses Final Environmental Impact Report Table 3-1 — Summary of Potential Environmental Impacts Environmental South Station Widett Circle Readville – Yard 2 Impacts Land Use and • Acquire United States • Acquire Cold • Partial acquisition of Property Postal Service (USPS) Storage and New James G. Grant Co. property Boston Food Market LLC property (approximately properties (approximately 14 acres). (approximately 0.7 acres). • Acquire parcel 25.1 acres). adjacent to • Acquire Widett 245 Summer Street to Circle and Foodmart reopen Dorchester Road (approximately Avenue 6.2 acres). (approximately • Acquire a portion of 0.2 acres). Department of • Reopen Dorchester Public Works Avenue to public (DPW) facility at right-of-way. Broad Interlocking (0.1 acres) Wetlands • Direct impact to • No wetland impacts. • Direct impact to approximately approximately 2.9 acres of Land 0.01 acres of Subject to Coastal Riverfront Area. Storm Flowage • Direct impact to (LSCSF). 0.3 acres of 100-foot • Direct impact to buffer zone. approximately 700 • Direct impact to linear feet of coastal 0.6 acres of isolated bank vegetated wetlands. • Direct impact to approximately 7.9 acres of coastal bank 100-foot buffer zone Chapter 91 • Removes the • Not subject to • Not subject to Waterways and nonwater-dependent Chapter 91. Chapter 91. Tidelands USPS facility from filled Commonwealth Tidelands. • Expands existing transportation infrastructure. • Reopens approximately 5.0 acres of filled tidelands to public access. • Provides approximately 0.5 miles of newly reopened public June 2016 South Station Expansion Page 3-2 Massachusetts Department of Transportation Final Environmental Impact Report Chapter 3 – Environmental Analyses Environmental South Station Widett Circle Readville – Yard 2 Impacts roadway. • Creates approximately 3.0 acres of pedestrian-oriented open space. Water Quality • Reduces impervious • Reduces impervious • Increases impervious and Stormwater cover by 7.3 acres. cover by 14.7 acres. cover by 2.0 acres. • Reduces peak flow • Reduces peak flow • Reduces peak flow rate and runoff volume rate and runoff rate and runoff to below pre- volume to below volume to below pre- development pre-development development conditions. conditions. conditions. • Provides stormwater • Would provide • Would provide recharge via a groundwater groundwater recharge bioretention area. recharge if feasible. if feasible. • Improves water • Improves water • Improves water quality by removing quality by removing quality by removing approximately 80% of approximately 80% approximately 80% total suspended solids of TSS. of TSS. (TSS). Water Supply • Increases water use • Decreases water use • Increases water use and Wastewater and wastewater and wastewater and wastewater generation by generation by generation by approximately 44% approximately 55% approximately 80% over existing over existing over existing conditions. conditions. conditions. Transportation • Increases ridership by • No ridership or • No ridership or approximately 11% in transit capacity transit capacity 2025 and by impacts. impacts. approximately 13% in 2035. • Would meet the MBTA’s Service Delivery Policy related to crowding impacts on rapid transit and local bus routes. • The Silver Line platform would experience a Daily pedestrian flow increase of 2% to 4% on Silver Line platforms and up to 6% on Red Line platforms. South Station Expansion June 2016 Massachusetts Department of Transportation Page 3-3 Chapter 3 – Environmental Analyses Final Environmental Impact Report Environmental South Station Widett Circle Readville – Yard 2 Impacts Traffic • Without mitigation, • No impact. Trip • No impact. Trip increases Level of generation at layover generation at layover Service (LOS) at one site is minimal. site is minimal. intersection and decreases LOS at three intersections; four are unchanged. With mitigation, LOS increases at seven intersections and LOS decreases at one intersection. Climate Change • Raising the seawall • Subject to flooding • Subject to increasing Adaptation will help mitigate from 1% annual incidence of extreme flooding from chance flood with heat events. projected 2 feet of sea 3.2 feet of sea level level rise by the year rise by the year 2050. 2070. • Subject to flooding • Subject to increasing from 1% annual incidence of extreme chance flood (100- heat events. year) with 3.2 feet of sea level rise by the year 2070. • Subject to increasing incidence of extreme heat events. Air Quality • No adverse air quality • No adverse air • No adverse air impacts expected as a quality impacts quality impacts result of the project. expected as a result expected as a result of the project. of the project. Noise and • Prior to mitigation, • No noise or vibration • Prior to mitigation, Vibration moderate noise impact impacts. moderate noise is projected at impact is projected 245 Summer Street along Wolcott Street and across Fort Point and Riley Road. The Channel at Necco proposed noise wall Street due to removal extension would of noise buffering mitigate this impact. USPS facility. The • No vibration impact. proposed noise wall would mitigate this impact. • No vibration impact. June 2016 South Station Expansion Page 3-4 Massachusetts Department of Transportation Final Environmental Impact Report Chapter 3 – Environmental Analyses Environmental South Station Widett Circle Readville – Yard 2 Impacts Greenhouse Gas • Reduction in • Stationary sources • Stationary sources Emissions stationary source not modeled.1 not modeled.1 Facility greenhouse gas Facility to comply to comply with (GHG) emissions by with Stretch Code. Stretch Code. approximately 8% in • Increase in mobile • Increase in mobile compliance with the source CO2 source CO2 emissions Massachusetts Stretch emissions by by approximately Energy Code. approximately 2,500 tons per year in • Approximately 5% net 5,800 tons per year 2025 and 2035. reduction in carbon in 2025 and 2035. dioxide (CO2) emissions from locomotives near South Station, due to decreased congestion and idling time on the tracks. • Saves 46,000 tons of CO2 per year in the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) region. Historic • No adverse effect on • No historic • No historic properties Resources historic properties properties affected. affected. identified in the Area • No archaeological • No archaeological of Potential Effect sensitivity. sensitivity. (APE). • Improved views to and from Fort Point Channel Historic District due to removal of USPS building and construction of Harborwalk. • No archaeological sensitivity. Site • Identification of three • Identification of two • Identification of four Contamination/ Recorded RECs and seven RECs. Hazardous Environmental HRECs. Materials Conditions (RECs) and six Historic Recorded Environmental 1 In a pre-DEIR filing meeting with MEPA and DOER on November 26, 2013, it was confirmed that building energy modeling was not required for the layover facility sites. South Station Expansion June 2016 Massachusetts Department of Transportation Page 3-5 Chapter 3 – Environmental Analyses Final Environmental Impact Report Environmental
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction of Lifecycle Properties in High Speed Rail Systems Operation
    Interaction of Lifecycle Properties in High Speed Rail Systems Operation by Tatsuya Doi M.E., Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Tokyo, 2011 B.E., Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Tokyo, 2009 Submitted to the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering Systems at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2016 © 2016 Tatsuya Doi. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: ____________________________________________________________________ Institute for Data, Systems, and Society May 6, 2016 Certified by: __________________________________________________________________________ Joseph M. Sussman JR East Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Engineering Systems Thesis Supervisor Certified by: __________________________________________________________________________ Olivier L. de Weck Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: _________________________________________________________________________ John N. Tsitsiklis Clarence J. Lebel Professor of Electrical Engineering IDSS Graduate Officer 1 2 Interaction of Lifecycle Properties In High Speed Rail Systems Operation by Tatsuya Doi Submitted to the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society on May 6, 2016 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering Systems ABSTRACT High-Speed Rail (HSR) has been expanding throughout the world, providing various nations with alternative solutions for the infrastructure design of intercity passenger travel. HSR is a capital-intensive infrastructure, in which multiple subsystems are closely integrated. Also, HSR operation lasts for a long period, and its performance indicators are continuously altered by incremental updates.
    [Show full text]
  • South Dakota's Railroads
    South Dakota’s Railroads South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office South Dakota’s Railroads: An Historic Context Prepared for: South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office 900 Governors Drive Pierre, South Dakota 57501 Prepared by: Mark Hufstetler and Michael Bedeau Renewable Technologies, Inc. 511 Metals Bank Bldg. Butte, Montana 59701 July 1998 Revised, December 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................2 A. Purpose of this Document..............................................................................................2 B. Methodology ..................................................................................................................3 2. The Importance of Railroads to South Dakota ...........................................................................4 3. The History of Railroading in South Dakota..............................................................................5 A. Geographical Background .............................................................................................5 B. Establishment and Expansion: South Dakota Railroads in the Nineteenth Century......6 1. Beginnings (1851-1868) .....................................................................................6 2. The Little Dakota Boom and the First Railroads (1868-1873)...........................8 3. Railway Expansion During the Great Dakota Boom (1878-1887).....................9 4. The Impact and
    [Show full text]
  • Public Meeting on the Environmental Assessment of the Proposed Improvement to Hiawatha Service
    SUMMARY PUBLIC MEETING ON THE DESIGN ASPECTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT ON THE AMTRAK HIAWATHA SERVICE BETWEEN MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN AND CHICAGO, ILLINOIS November 1, 2016 A Public Meeting was held on Tuesday, Nov. 1 2016 at Chicago Union Station, 500 W. Jackson Chicago, IL from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. regarding detailed design aspects of the proposed improvement consisting of adding additional round trips to the Milwaukee to Chicago Amtrak Hiawatha Service and the associated railroad infrastructure improvements. The corridor includes Milwaukee, Racine, and Kenosha counties in Wisconsin, with the Wisconsin infrastructure improvements located in Milwaukee County. The corridor also includes Lake and Cook counties in Illinois, with infrastructure improvements in those counties. The open-style Public Meeting featured the following activities: Presentation – An informal audio visual presentation on a continuous loop provided an overview of the Environmental Assessment. Exhibit Boards – Boards regarding the project history, the EA process, proposed routes and service alternatives, proposed infrastructure improvements, environmental impacts, land acquisition, capital and operating costs and the public involvement process. Individual Discussions with WisDOT, IDOT and Team Members – Throughout the Public Hearing, participants were provided the opportunity to speak with representatives. Provision of Comment Forms – Comment forms were available at the meeting for attendees to fill out and submit via the mail, in person, or online. Copies of the Draft Environmental Assessment were available for review The meeting was attended by 29 people. There were 3 comment forms received at the meeting. The public was notified of the Public Meeting throughout September and October via postings on the Illinois Passenger Rail web site, electronic 3rd party announcements distributed to stakeholders, letters to public officials and municipalities along the corridor, newspaper ads in Chicago and Glenview, email announcements and postcards.
    [Show full text]
  • First Bus All Aboard! Rail System Map Detailed Fare in for Ma Tion Service
    All aboard! Detailed fare in for ma tion First bus / last bus times This map gives detailed information about Chica go Transit Base/regular fares All CTA and Pace buses are accessible to people with disabilities. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUN./HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUN./HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUN./HOL. Authority bus and el e vat ed/sub way train ser vice, and shows Full Reduced Student Reduced fare program X Pay-per-ride fares, as deducted from value in a Ventra Transit Account Use this chart to determine days, hours of service, where each Pace subur ban bus and Metra commut er train routes in the The following groups are eligible to pay a reduced fare on CTA: CTA ser vice area. It is up dat ed regularly, and avail able at ‘L’ train fare $2.50* $1.25 75¢ route begins and ends, and first and last buses in each direction Wallace/Racine West Lawrence Inner Drive/Michigan Express 44 Racine/87th north to Halsted (Orange) 4:30a-9:40p 8:00a-6:00p 9:00a-6:00p 81W Cumberland (Blue) east to Jeff Park (Blue) 5:25a-10:25p 5:20a-10:20p 8:45a-10:15p 14 6 Berwyn (Red) south to Museum Campus 5:55a-10:40p 6:00a-10:40p 6:00a-10:40p † on each route. X X X CTA rail stations, Metra down town terminals, visitor cen ters, Bus fare $2.25 $1.10 75¢ Children 7 through 11 Halsted (Orange) south to Racine/87th 5:15a-10:25p 8:50a-6:45p 9:45a-6:45p Museum Campus north to Berwyn (Red) 7:00a-11:35p 6:50a-11:40p 6:50a-11:35p X Jeff Park X (Blue) west to Cumberland X (Blue) 4:55a-9:55p 4:50a-9:50p 8:20a-9:50p air ports, or by calling the RTA.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Downtown Chicago Connections
    Stone Scott Regional Transportation 1 2 3 4 5Sheridan 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Dr 270 ter ss C en 619 421 Edens Plaza 213 Division Division ne 272 Lake Authority i ood s 422 Sk 422 u D 423 LaSalle B w 423 Clark/Division e Forest y okie Rd Central 151 a WILMETTE ville s amie 422 The Regional Transportation Authority r P GLENVIEW 800W 600W 200W nonstop between Michigan/Delaware 620 421 0 E/W eehan Preserve Wilmette C Union Pacific/North Line 3rd 143 l Forest Baha’i Temple F e La Elm ollw Green Bay a D vice 4th v Green Glenview Glenview to Waukegan, Kenosha and Stockton/Arlington (2500N) T i lo 210 626 Evanston Elm n (RTA) provides financial oversight, Preserve bard Linden nonstop between Michigan/Delaware e Dewes b 421 146 s Wilmette 221 Dear Milw Foster and Lake Shore/Belmont (3200N) funding, and regional transit planning R Glenview Rd 94 Hi 422 221 i i-State 270 Cedar nonstop between Delaware/Michigan Rand v r Emerson Chicago Downtown Central auk T 70 e Oakton National- Ryan Field & Welsh-Ryan Arena Map Legend Hill 147 r Cook Co 213 and Marine/Foster (5200N) for the three public transit operations Comm ee Louis Univ okie Central Courts k Central 213 93 Maple College 201 Sheridan nonstop between Delaware/Michigan Holy 422 S 148 Old Orchard Gross 206 C Northwestern Univ Hobbie and Marine/Irving Park (4000N) Dee Family yman 270 Point Central St/ CTA Trains Hooker Wendell 22 70 36 Bellevue L in Northeastern Illinois: The Chicago olf Cr Chicago A Harrison 54A 201 Evanston 206 A 8 A W Sheridan Medical 272 egan osby Maple th Central Ser 423 201 k Illinois Center 412 GOLF Westfield Noyes Blue Line Haines Transit Authority (CTA), Metra and Antioch Golf Glen Holocaust 37 208 au 234 D Golf Old Orchard Benson Between O’Hare Airport, Downtown Newberry Oak W Museum Nor to Golf Golf Golf Simpson EVANSTON Oak Research Sherman & Forest Park Oak Pace Suburban bus.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 - 2018 Lake County Parks and Recreation Master Plan
    2014 - 2018 LAKE COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN FINAL PLAN April 2014 This publication has been prepared by the Lake County Parks and Recreation Department. For clariication or additional information, please contact the following: Robert Nickovich, Chief Executive Oficer Lake County Parks and Recreation Department 8411 East Lincoln Highway Crown Point, Indiana 46307 219-769-7275 Craig Zandstra, Special Projects Coordinator Lake County Parks and Recreation Department 8411 East Lincoln Highway Crown Point, Indiana 46307 219-769-7275 All information contained herein is expressly the property of the Lake County Parks and Recreation Department. Should any or all of this publication be duplicated elsewhere, we request appropriate attributions for such usage. Prepared By: Lake County Parks and Recreation Department 8411 East Lincoln Highway Crown Point, Indiana 46307 219-945-0543 www.lakecountyparks.com Prepared August 2013 - April 2014 2014 - 2018 LAKE COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN PREFACE 4 LAKE COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION MASTER PLAN 2014 - 2018 PREFACE IDNR Acceptance Letter Michael R. Pence, Governor Cameron F. Clark, Director Division of Outdoor Recreation DNR Indiana Department of Natural Resources 402 W. Washington Street W271 Indianapolis, IN 46204-2782 317-232-4070 Fax: 317-233-4648 www.IN.gov/dnr/outdoor James W. Tonkovich January 9th, 2015 Park Board President Lake County Park and Recreation Board 8411 East Lincoln Highway Crown Point, IN 46307 Dear Mr. Tonkovich, The DNR Division of Outdoor Recreation planning staff has reviewed the final draft of the 2015-2019 Lake County Five Year Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The plan meets the Department of Natural Resources’ minimum requirements for local parks and recreation master plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Envision HOI – Long-Range Transportation Plan
    ENVISION HOI Heart of Illinois Long Range Transportation Plan This plan was prepared by TCRPC staff in collaboration with its member agencies, partnership organizations, and local stakeholders. LRTP BLUE RIBBON STEERING COMMITTEE LRTP TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Maureen Addis, IDOT District 4 Joe Alexander, CityLink Mayor Mark Allen, Village of Peoria Heights Marty Clinch, Woodford County Mayor Jim Ardis, City of Peoria Aaron Coffeen, Bike Peoria Mayor Laurie Barra, City of Pekin Michael Guerra, PPUATS Technical Committee Mayor Doug Crew, City of Chillicothe John Hamann, HSTP Committee Mayor Dana Dearborn, Village of Marquette Heights Sally Hanley, Economic Development Council for Central Mayor Jeff DeGroot, Village of Germantown Hills Illinois Mayor James Dillon, City of West Peoria Tom Kelso, IDOT Mayor Jack Fennell, Village of Dunlap Denny Kief, Focus Forward Central Illinois Mayor Stephen Flowers, Village of North Pekin Gary Maden, Army Corps of Engineers, Rock Island Kensil Garnett, IDOT District 4 Gene Olson, Metropolitan Airport Authority of Peoria Stan Glasier, Woodford County Board Chair Tom O’Neill, PPUATS Policy Committee Mayor Fred Lang, Village of Creve Coeur Marshall B. Plumley, Army Corps of Engineers, Rock Island Mayor Gary Manier, City of Washington Mike Pula, Friends of the Rock Island Trail Sharon McBride, Greater Peoria Mass Transit District Board Chair Mayor Ron Rainson, PPUATS Policy Committee Mayor Dave Mingus, City of East Peoria Mike Rogers, City of Peoria Public Works Tom O’Neill, Peoria County Board Chairman
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Union Station Master Plan Study Final Report
    Chicago Union Station Master Plan Study Final Report Prepared For: In Cooperation With: May 2012 Chicago Union Station Master Plan Study May 2012 Chicago Union Station Master Plan Study Prepared For: Chicago Department of Transportation In Cooperation With Stakeholders Including: Amtrak Metra Chicago Transit Authority Regional Transportation Authority Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Illinois Department of Transportation Metropolitan Planning Council U.S. Department of Transportation City of Chicago Department of Housing and Economic Development Prepared By: TranSystems Corporation EJM Engineering, Inc. Ross Barney Architects Hatch Mott MacDonald Big Picture Marketing, Inc. www.UnionStationMP.org Some blank pages have been inserted to facilitate two-sided printing. Labels on some engineering drawings may require printing at 11” x 17” to be readable. Photographs were taken by TranSystems unless otherwise noted. ii May 2012 Chicago Union Station Master Plan Study Contents Executive Summary Appendices 1 - Introduction 1 A - Historical Items 2 - History 7 • Railway Age article on the opening of CUS • 1950s CUS promotional brochure 3 - Study Background 17 B - Street Access Existing Conditions report 4 - Ideas for Improvements 35 C - Medium Term Ideas 5 - Public Involvement 59 • Widen 6/8 and 10/12 platforms, add vertical access 6 - Next Steps 71 • Convert mail platform – Phase 1 Credits 77 • Space planning concepts • Canal St. viaducts concepts • Adams-Jackson block island, plan and section • Union Station area plan (assuming Canal
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Bike-On-Amtrak Guide
    Illinois Bike-on-Amtrak Guide An informal guide to help you use the train and your bicycle to explore Illinois Have you wanted to give bike touring a try? Have you thought of a route in Illinois but are unsure of how to get you and your bike there? Using our state’s “walk-on” bikes-on-Amtrak program allows bicyclists to do close-to-home day, weekend, or even longer trips. Ride Illinois developed this guide to encourage and assist Amtrak-based bicycle tourists by providing information for participating communities, including links to maps with good rural routes near the town. Consider the following trip types: 1) One Town: Take a day or overnight trip to an Amtrak town, exploring the town and the surrounding areas. 2) One-Way along an Amtrak Line: Extend your bicycle ride area by taking the train to one Amtrak town and biking to another, returning from there. As an example, maybe you’d like to bike the Route 66 Trail from Chicago, returning by train from St. Louis—or an earlier stop, if needed. Or, on a windy day, you’d like to “cheat” with a one-way, all-tailwind ride! 3) Between Amtrak Lines: Especially if Chicago is part of your trip, you could plan a ride between two towns on different Amtrak lines. One longer example—riding a section of Illinois’ Mississippi River Trail! Illinois’ Amtrak towns How this guide is organized: Each participating town has two pages with an Amtrak line map, station address and train schedules, town summary, photos, attractions, lodging and camping, a few suggested rides in the surrounding areas, and other information such as hospitals, wi-fi access, nearest bike shops, and nearby towns having (at least) a convenience store.
    [Show full text]
  • Metra Stations Guide
    METRA STATIONS GUIDE Welcome to Metra, the commuter rail system that serves Northeast Illinois. Metra operates eleven rail lines that serve the six counties surrounding the Chicago Metro area. On an average business day, nearly 300,000 commuters use Metra to get to and from work, access recreation or anything else they wish to do. There are 242 stations in the Metra system. Over 80% of these stations are accessible to riders with disabilities. These stations represent 96% of all system wide boardings. This Stations Guide has been produced to assist the many customers who are blind and visually impaired who require the same information that other customers access in print format. In this document, there is an emphasis on directional and way-finding information to assist these customers navigating the Metra system. In lieu of maps, each rail district is laid out with stations listed from the downtown terminus point to the end of that particular line. Metra’s Downtown Terminals Metra is a true “hub and spoke” rail system. All eleven lines radiate out from the Chicago downtown area. The vast majority of riders come into the city center from outlying communities to access employment and entertainment. Metra has five major downtown stations: Chicago Union Station, Millennium Station, the Ogilvie Transportation Center, LaSalle Street Station and the Van Buren Station. At all of these facilities, there is an audio system to assist blind and visually impaired customers locate which track their train is departing from and track enunciators to help locate their track. This is in place so that a customer with significant visual loss can navigate their way through a station and get to their train without assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Chicago Transit
    Chicago History Museum Lincoln Park Zoo Downtown Chicago Transit Map CTA METRA CTA, PACE TRAINS TRAINS BUSES 1 2 3 Scott4 5 6 LaSalle 70 Division 70 Division 70 70 Chicago History Museum Clark/Division 151 Lincoln Park Zoo 800W 600W 200W 0 E/W Elm served by bus 22 or 151 Elm 146 146 nonstop between Michigan/Delaware Only full-time bus routes Viceroy 147 146 and Lake Shore/Belmont (3200N) Hotel are shown. CTA and Pace Cedar nonstop between Delaware/Michigan Hill 70 147 147 offer additional weekday and Marine/Foster (5200N) and rush period service. Maple Hobbie Visit RTAChicago.org 36 Bellevue Hooker Wendell 22 for more information. 8 Cr 70 Thompson osby A Haines Hotel A Oak Oak Oak North Branch Drake Hotel 146 Millennium Waldorf Walton 147 Knickerbocker Walton Astoria Hotel C Newberry 151 Residence Inn h Research Four ic a Kingsbury Seasons Westin Hilton Suites g Library The Talbott o Hotel W Locust Delaware 360º Chicago at The Whitehall Raffaello Hotel er Tremont John Hancock Taxi Center to/f Chicago The Seneca rom North A State ven Chestnut 22 Sofitel 10 ue Chicago Chestnut (s Water Tower u n m 22 r 36 Water Tower Place m Moody Ritz e r Bible Dewitt Loyola Carlton o Institute Pl Institute Pearson NORTH n University Hudson Sedgwick Orleans LaSalle Clark Dearbo Halsted l Larrabee Cambridge y ) Park Mies van der Rohe Museum of 800N Hyatt Contemporary Art 66 66 3 66 66 Chicago Chicago Chicago Chicago Lake Shore Drive 66 66 3 66 66 Chicago Peninsula Lurie Northwestern Superior Chicago Cambria Childrens University Hotel Hospital Downtown B
    [Show full text]