2014 - 2018 Lake County Parks and Recreation Master Plan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator. -
Outdoor Adventures
1 M18 Alyea Park 2 M18 Ambler Flatwoods Nature Preserve 3 M18 American Discovery Trail 4 M18 Aukiki Wetland Conservation Area 5 M18 Bailly Homestead and Chellberg Farm 6 M18 Barker Woods 7 M18 Beverly Shores Area OUTDOOR ADVENTURES MAP 8 M18 Bicentennial Park 9 M18 Bluhm County Park 10 M18 Brincka-Cross Gardens 11 M18 Broken Wagon Bison 12 M18 Brookdale Park 13 M18 C&O Greenway 14 M18 Calumet Bike Trail 15 M18 Calumet Park 16 M18 Campbell Street Access 17 M18 Central Avenue Beach 18 M18 Central Park Plaza 19 M18 Chustak Public Fishing Area 20 M18 Coffee Creek Park A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y 21 M18 Coffee Creek Watershed Preserve 22 M18 Countryside Park and Alton Goin Museum 1 1 23 M18 Cowles Bog Trail 24 M18 Creek Ridge County Park 95 New Buffalo 25 M18 Creekside Park 2 2 26 M18 Cressmoor Prairie Nature Preserve 27 M18 239 94 Dale B. Engquist Nature Preserve 12 28 M18 Deep River County Park US BIKE ROUTE #36 3 Wilson Rd 3 29 M18 Deep River Water Trail Michiana MICHIGAN 30 M18 Deer Trail Park Michiana 77 W 10 E 1000 N ShShooresres 00 N INDIANA 31 M18 Drazer Park (Thomas S. Drazer Memorial Park) E 0 0 5 Long 94 4 N 32 M18 Dunbar Beach 4 E 900 N 77 Beach 12 US BIKE ROUTE #36 33 M18 Dune Park Station 128 44 2 Tryon Rd 39 92 d W 800 N Saugany 15 R 34 E k M18 Dune Succession Trail Lake c E i 5 W Michigan 2 w 131 0 r Blvd 4 0 Hudson a 212 3 124 N K t Lake S N Meer Rd. -
Interaction of Lifecycle Properties in High Speed Rail Systems Operation
Interaction of Lifecycle Properties in High Speed Rail Systems Operation by Tatsuya Doi M.E., Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Tokyo, 2011 B.E., Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Tokyo, 2009 Submitted to the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering Systems at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2016 © 2016 Tatsuya Doi. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: ____________________________________________________________________ Institute for Data, Systems, and Society May 6, 2016 Certified by: __________________________________________________________________________ Joseph M. Sussman JR East Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Engineering Systems Thesis Supervisor Certified by: __________________________________________________________________________ Olivier L. de Weck Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: _________________________________________________________________________ John N. Tsitsiklis Clarence J. Lebel Professor of Electrical Engineering IDSS Graduate Officer 1 2 Interaction of Lifecycle Properties In High Speed Rail Systems Operation by Tatsuya Doi Submitted to the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society on May 6, 2016 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering Systems ABSTRACT High-Speed Rail (HSR) has been expanding throughout the world, providing various nations with alternative solutions for the infrastructure design of intercity passenger travel. HSR is a capital-intensive infrastructure, in which multiple subsystems are closely integrated. Also, HSR operation lasts for a long period, and its performance indicators are continuously altered by incremental updates. -
The Indiana State Trails · Greenways & Bikeways Plan
THE INDIANA STATE TRAILS · GREENWAYS & BIKEWAYS PLAN STATE OF INDIANA Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR Governor State House, Second Floor Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Dear Trail Enthusiasts: With great excitement, I welcome you to travel the path down our state’s latest comprehensive trails plan. Not since our state park system was created has the state undertaken an outdoor initiative of this potential scope. This initiative will soon begin uniting our state’s disconnected routes and place every Hoosier within 15 minutes of a trail. The whole will be much greater than the sum of its parts and will benefit Hoosiers from all walks of life. We doubled state funding from $10 million to $20 million annually to take advan- tage of this unique network of opportunities, and at first glance this is a recreation initiative, but we intend it to be much more. Our trails plan will encourage healthy habits in Hoosiers, boost tourism and enhance Indiana’s ability to attract new investment and jobs. Our trail investments can deliver. As Hoosiers enjoy our new trails, they will be hiking, walking, and rid- ing over miles of new high-speed telecommunications and utility conduits. Access to outdoor recreation also ranks among the features potential companies seek for their employees when locating a business. Real success will require the help of local communities, businesses, and private philanthropies. Let’s join together as we create something that will be the envy of the nation! Sincerely, Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr. HOOSIERS ON THE MOVE THE -
Bikes on Trains Program
Trails Ride your bike along Lakeshore Bike Drive in Chicago, explore the trails the South Shore Line along the Indiana Dunes National Park and experience vibrant APRIL 1, 2019 - OCTOBER 31, 2019* Your bike can ride, too! downtown South Bend. Bicycling enthusiasts can take their bikes on the South Shore Line from Chicago to South Bend! South Bend Hammond Bike racks, located in specified train cars, are Airport Erie Lackawanna Trail provided free of charge on a first-come, East Bank Trail Monon Trail first-served basis. Northside Trail Wolf Lake Trail Riverside Trail West Bank Walkway Hegewisch Look for the Symbol Big Marsh Park Dune Park Bike rack-equipped train cars are clearly marked Calumet Trail 57th Street with a bike symbol prominently located on the Dunes Kankakee Trail McCormick Place windows of each car. Cyclists are asked to enter Museum Campus and exit the bike train cars through the center East Chicago Van Buren Millennium doors. Upon boarding, bikes are to be placed in the Bloomingdale Trail Lake George Trail Lakefront Trail self-locking racks. For more information on trails visit: South Shore Indiana Dunes LaPorte County Visit South Bend Convention & Tourism Convention & Mishawaka Visitors Authority Visitors Bureau mysouthshoreline.com For safety reasons, bicycles may only board Millennium or disembark at designated stations. Van Buren Street Now you can Museum Campus McCormick Place Bicycle Platform 57th Street Bicycles Not Permitted 63rd Street ES UN K A D AR DIAN L P IN ION A NAT Bike Hegewisch Lake Hudson 11th Street (M. City)11th Dune Park Hammond Miller South Bend Airport Beverly Shores Beverly Carroll Avenue (M. -
Dunes Kankakee Trail Study
k k ar ar P l P gs oo e rin ch agu Sp S e n ry L ia ta tle d n rk Lit In e Pa k k, m e ar ol ar Ele n P ho P t or te c e os th a y S ak Y w St ar t L on Ha nt at wt e Pr e m N Ele itt m m 70 ru t 1 B Prairie Duneland/Calumet Trail Connector os n{ P gion Le n ica er Am k ar l P ia nn te en s C a rk k om Pa ar Th P kom on rk s ks l Pa a k c oo k . W ar Ja h e t L P Sc re . er s le C .A rle d k ee .C Rob ha id ar f .M C M Pn{ Cof Y ke on on nd La rt rt la ste ste ne he e u Chesterton Town Boundary C Ch D il Tra d n{ lan Libraries (ISL) ne Du ie air l r . P t oo S h Recreational Facilities (IDNR) Sc d ry r ta 3 en 2 lem Restaurants (MarketMaker) g E ailly n o l B h a p e K Jos n o Hospitals (HAZUS) i t o e c t l lp e oo a n h u o Sc V R 5 te n Schools (HAZUS) o o n ia t c d e a i m h d r e t d i t n r r In õ e ou a l te Farmers Market (Porter Co. -
Water Resources and Use in Lake County
¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ " ¸ S # Whiting # ¸ ¸ # # " ¸ S S" # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # # ¸ # East ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ Chicago # ¸ ¸ # S" # Ogden Burns Harbor ¸ # Dunes ¸ # ¸ # S" ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ S" # ¸ # Porter Chesterton ¸ I-90 # S" ¸ ¸ # ¸ # # ¸ ¨¦§ I-94 S" # Gary ¨¦§ Hammond S" Lake S" Station Portage 80 ¸ # New I- ¸ S" Munster # S" I-80 § ¸ ¸ ¨¦ ¸ # # # ¸ ¨¦§ Chicago # " ¸ S ¸ # # Highland ¸ # ¸ S" S" # South ¸ # Haven ¸ # ¸ # Hobart ¸ " # Griffith S ¸ # S" ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # " # S ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # # # ¸ Dyer # ¸ ¸ # S" Merrillville # ¸ Schererville # " S" Valparaiso S S" Saint John S" r e e ¸ t # ¸ k # r ¸ # a o ¸ Crown # L P ¸ # Point ¸ S" # ¸ # ¸ # ¨¦§ I - ¸ 6 # Cedar 5 Lake ¸ # ¸ Cedar S" # ¸ Lake # ¸ Hebron Kouts # S" S" ¸ Lowell # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ S" # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # # # ¸ Por # t ¸ ¸ e # # r ¸ ¸ # ¸ # Jas # ¸ p # ¸ e # r ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # ¸ # # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # ¸ ¸ ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # # # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # ¸ # ke # ¸ # a ¸ ¸ ¸ L # # # ¸ # ¸ r # e sp ¸ a # J ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # ¸ # ¸ DeMotte # Wheatfield ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # ¸ " # n S r ¸ # S" e o ¸ ¸ # # ¸ t # p s w ¸ ¸ # # a e ¸ ¸ ¸ ¸ # # # # J N r ¸ Rive # ¸ Kankakee # ¨¦§I ¸ # - Lake 6 5 ewton N ¸ # ¸ ¸ # # Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community ¸ # ¸ # ¸ # Withdrawal -
Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore: Transportation System Existing
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Portage, IN Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Transportation System Existing Conditions The Pavilion at Portage Lakefront and Riverwalk Source: Volpe Center photograph (July 2015) Agreement No. P15PG00222 May 20, 2016 Table of Contents Report notes ......................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgments ................................................................................................ iii Definitions ............................................................................................................. iv Executive Summary ...............................................................................................1 Transportation System Context ............................................................................2 Park Background ............................................................................................................. 2 Geographic Context ......................................................................................................... 4 Regional Transportation Planning Context .........................................................8 Existing Conditions by Mode .............................................................................. 11 Motor Vehicle ................................................................................................................ 11 Shuttle ......................................................................................................................... -
Lodged Consent Decree US Steel #2733655 (PDF)
USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv-00127 document 2-1 filed 04/02/18 page 1 of 59 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION __________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) and the STATE OF INDIANA, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Case No. v. ) ) Judge UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________________ ) CONSENT DECREE USDC IN/ND case 2:18-cv-00127 document 2-1 filed 04/02/18 page 2 of 59 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 1 II. OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. 4 III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ...................................................................................... 4 IV. APPLICABILITY ............................................................................................................ 5 V. DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................. 6 VI. COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................ 12 VII. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SUBMITTALS ...................................................... 17 VIII. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................... 19 IX. PAYMENT OF NOAA COSTS ................................................................................... -
A Plan by the Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission (NIRPC) Table of Contents
The Marquette Action Plan A Plan by the Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission (NIRPC) Table of Contents Tyson Warner, AICP 4 Introduction Executive Director 4 History of the Marquette Plan 5 Overview Kathy Luther 6 Need for an Action Plan Chief of Staff 7 Lake Michigan Shoreline Access 8 Outreach Eman Ibrahim 9 Survey Results Planning Manager 13 Regional Approach Sarah Geinosky 14 Current Regionwide Shoreline Access Former GIS Analyst 16 Accessibility for All Project Manager 18 Pedestrian and Bicycle Access 20 Canoe and Kayak Access Gabrielle Biciunas 22 Fishing Access 24 Parking Access Long-Range Planner 26 Access by Public Transit 28 Planning Coordination James Winters 30 Tourism, Marketing, and Wayfinding Coordination Transit Planner 33 Community Approach Northwest Indiana Regional 34 Hammond 38 Whiting Development Authority (RDA) 42 East Chicago Bill Hanna 46 Gary West President and CEO 50 Gary East 54 Portage and Ogden Dunes 58 Burns Harbor and Dune Acres Policy Analytics 62 Indiana Dunes State Park, the Town of Porter, and Chesterton William Sheldrake 66 Beverly Shores, the Town of Pines, and the National Lakeshore East President 70 Michigan City, Long Beach, and Michiana Shores 74 Finance and Maintenance Jason O’Neill Senior Consultant The Marquette Action Plan For more information visit http://www.rdatransformation.com/ A Plan by The Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission June 2018 www.nirpc.org Requests for alternate formats: please contact Mary Thorne at NIRPC at (219) 763-6060 extension 131 or at [email protected]. Individuals with hearing impairments may contact us through the Indiana Relay 711 service by calling 711 or (800) 743-3333. -
Sharing the Trail Prevention
 60th Á ¨¦§94 Maudlin Rd Jackson §90 Á Park ¨¦ Woodlawn Dorchester EDITION Lakefront Trail 2012 King Halsted Kostner Marquette Marquette Greenway Forest Lawn Rd Marquette to New Buffalo Marquette California Lakeside Rd Grand Trunk Trail Trunk Grand South Wilson Rd Rd Nye Damen State .org nirpc Shore Oaks RdThree www. 71st Á Á Á Witt Rd Basswood Rd Martin Rd E 850 N 850 E US 12 Berrien County MICHIGAN Michiana Dr King Loomis Á 76th Á 76th Rainbow LaPorte County IN Hesston Steam Museum INDIANA Portage, Vincennes Beach E 1000 N N 500 E E 900 N N 150 E 150 N LAKE MICHIGAN Michiana W 1000 N N 215 E  Á COMMISSION PLANNING Illinois Central Line Á Á Shores Dr Portal E NDIANA REGIONAL REGIONAL NDIANA I N R ESTE HW T R O Long Frontage Rd N 83rd 83rd  by Prepared 83rd Á South Chicago Á U39 South Shore South V Â83rd Beach Yellow Birch Á Major Taylor Trail N 500 W W 925 W Rock Island Trail Wetland W 900 N W 900 N N 200 E Thompson Bog 87th  94 Á Á ¨¦§ N 600 E Kedzie Á Nature Preserve California N 375 W Dan Ryan 41 Lake Shore Dr 90 AILS TR R Ambler Flatwoods ¨¦§ WATE & BIKING HIKING, REGIONAL Woods Á Jeffery ¨¦§80 N 125 E 125 N Lain §90 Michigan Nature Preserve SR 39 91st Á ¨¦ 92nd Á Kenwood 93rd  ! ! 93rd Á ! Washington! 212 Lakefront South Trail Extension ! U ! V ! ! ! ! Meer Rd ! Park E 800 N 20 ! ! ! Tryon Rd W 800 N ! ! N 400 W Saugana Trl 2 ! ! £12 N 300 W ! !Singing¤ Sands - Lighthouse Trail ! !  Lake Calumet Bikeways ! Pottawattamie Á  !  Á ! ! !  Evergreen Park Á ! ! Emery Rd ! City ! Á Chicago Á Park Karwick Rd Karwick -
Chapter 7; Section 4(F)
West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Chapter 7 Section 4(f) Evaluation Chapter 7 Section 4(f) Evaluation March 2018 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Chapter 7 Section 4(f) Evaluation This page intentionally left blank. March 2018 West Lake Corridor Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Record of Decision and Section 4(f) Evaluation Chapter 7 Section 4(f) Evaluation 7 Section 4(f) Evaluation Chapter 7 identifies and evaluates the potential effects from the FEIS Preferred Alternative and the alternatives considered in the DEIS, including the DEIS NEPA Preferred Alternative. This chapter describes the effect of the Project on properties protected by Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, commonly known as Section 4(f). Section 4(f) established requirements for USDOT, including FTA, to consider publicly owned parks/recreational areas that are accessible to the general public, publicly owned wildlife/waterfowl refuges, and publicly or privately owned historic sites of federal, state, or local significance in developing transportation projects (49 USC § 303). Section 4(f) prohibits use of these resources for transportation projects unless (1) it is proven that there is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use and the action includes all possible planning to minimize harm or (2) the agency determines that the use of the property, including any measure(s) to minimize harm, would have a de minimis impact on the property [23 CFR Part 774.3(a)]. This law is codified in 49 USC § 303 and 23 USC § 138 and is implemented by FTA through the regulations at 23 CFR Part 774.