DOCSLIB.ORG

Uneasy Relationship: the Dilemma of Liberal State and New Citizens

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uneasy Relationship: the Dilemma of Liberal State and New Citizens 1 Uneasy Relationship: The Dilemma of Liberal State and New Citizens By Raffi Markarian A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Carleton University © by Raffi Markarian, March 2010 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaONK1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your Me Votm refirence ISBN: 978-0-494-67868-8 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-67868-8 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduce, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformement a la loi canadienne sur la Privacy Act some supporting forms protection de la vie privee, quelques may have been removed from this formulaires secondaires ont ete enleves de thesis. cette these. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans in the document page count, their la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu removal does not represent any loss manquant. of content from the thesis. •+• Canada ii Uneasy Relationship: The Dilemma of the Liberal State and New Citizens Abstract This dissertation addresses one of the most compelling challenges facing liberal democracies today, namely integrating new citizens. For the past 150 years different generations of newcomers have integrated successfully into Western democratic systems. Today however, there are growing signs that this historic successful integration is not happening as smoothly as before. While the principles of liberal democratic systems encourage full integration of diverse communities in their societies, the empirical studies consistently and persistently show an increasing portion of new immigrants remaining socially, politically, and economically marginalized from the main stream society. By focusing on the case of Canada, this dissertation focuses on recent changes in the structure and behaviour of different players, the state, the new immigrants and civil society. The protagonists of the story narrated here therefore are: the new citizens and the dilemma they face; the liberal state and its transformation in the face of globalization; and the civil society, both as the scene for the playing out of the interaction between the first two, as well as the guardian of social and political cohesion. These changes have resulted in a more complicated and difficult relationship between them, subsequently making the integration of newcomers more difficult than before. While others trace the integration of newcomers in Western societies mainly through economic, social and cultural analysis, the main focus here is on the relationship and the dynamic interactions among the main players. Robust and dynamic interactions among them give rise to stronger social cohesion, political stability and stronger sense of iii self-worth and substantial citizenship. The big claim of this dissertation is that the recent changes in the definition, features and objectives of the main stakeholders of the immigration process may lie at the heart of the problematic of integrating new citizens in the liberal democratic systems. I present a detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis of these changes in order to explain the problem, and offer a multi-dimensional reading of "Multiculturalism" as a practical measure to soften the process of integration. Instead of treating multiculturalism as a policy, one should see it as a way of thinking and doing. Such approach would generate three interconnected principles of commitment, recognition and inclusion, and in turn, help main players reach out to the other side and develop a long lasting relationship; one that helps state and society enjoy stronger cohesion and the newcomers a stronger sense of belonging. iv Acknowledgements It is a pleasure to thank the many people who made this thesis possible. I would like to gratefully and sincerely thank Prof. Farhang Rajaee for his guidance, understanding, patience, and most importantly, his friendship. Without his constant guidance and paramount mentorship, I could not have finished my Ph.D. He was always there to meet and talk about my ideas, to proofread and mark up my papers and chapters, and to ask me good questions to help me think through my problems. I consider it my fortune to be his friend, and to have worked with him. I am also grateful to the members of my committee for taking the time to guide me through my dissertation. I would like express my appreciation to Prof. Tom Darby and Prof. Peter Swan for their insightful remarks and support. I would also like to acknowledge the members of the evaluation committee, Prof. Douglas Mogach and Prof. Warren Thorngate for their valuable guidance, and frank, critical comments. This work has benefited from various researchers. Special mention goes to the Metropolis project, whose publications served as the starting point for this thesis. I would also like to thank Angela Arnet Connidis for proof reading the text and providing editorial comments. Finally, I would like to thank my family. My wife, Anahid, has been the bedrock upon which the past fifteen years of my life have been built. My always positive and joyful children, Vana and Annie, have been a powerful source of inspiration and energy. I thank my parents, Khoodan and Nazik (Haygoui), for their faith in me and allowing me to be as ambitious as I wanted. v Table of Contents Abstract ii Acknowledgments iv Table of contents v Introduction 1-22 Chapter one: Theoretical Context 23-63 Citizenship Dimensions and Their Evolution; 29 Chapter Two: Problems 64-125 The Problematic of Immigrant's Economic Integration; 66 The Problematic of Immigrant's Political Integration; 90 The Problematic of Immigrant's Social Integration; 107 Chapter Three: Characteristics of the New Immigrant 126-177 Historical Patterns and Policies; 127 Immigrant's Destination; 144 Demographic Characteristics of the New Immigrant; 153 Education; 160 Religion; 163 Language; 166 Chapter Four: Transformation of the Liberal State 178-207 Welfare State & Workfare State; 178 The Great Transformation; 189 Chapter Five: Shrinking Civil Society 208-23 8 The Idea of Social Capital; 219 Immigrants Social Capital; 228 Conclusion 239-259 Bibliography 260-297 1 Uneasy Relationship: The Dilemma of Liberal State and New Citizens Introduction: With virtually one in five (19.8%) of its total population foreign-born in 2006, Canada has one of the largest proportions of foreign-born citizenry in the world. In comparison to other Western liberal states, 12.9% of the population in the United States is foreign -born, 12.4% in Sweden, 9.7% in the United Kingdom, and 8.1% in France, with only Australia boasting a larger concentration (23.8%) (OECD 2007, 330). The 2006 Canadian census revealed that between 2001 and 2006, Canada's foreign-born population increased by 13.6%. This was four times higher than the growth rate of 3.3% for the Canadian-born population during the same period (Statistics Canada 2007a). With over 150 years of experience with large scale immigration, Canada and other major immigrant receiving countries in the West, such as United States and Australia, pride themselves in their historical success of integrating foreign born immigrants. In the last 150 years, different generations of new comers have integrated successfully into the existing political system, just as they have integrated economically and socially, and have contributed enormously to the political, economic, and cultural development of their adopted new country. Today, however, there are growing signs that this historic prototype of successful integration of new comers in Western societies is at risk. While the principles of Western democratic systems encourage the full integration of diverse communities in their societies, the empirical studies consistently and persistently show an increasing portion of 2 new immigrants remain socially, politically, and economically marginalized from the main stream society. For example, a recent study by the Institute for Research on Public Policy (IRPP) discloses that newly arrived visible-minority1 immigrants are slower to integrate into Canadian society than their white, European counterparts. They are less likely to identify themselves as "Canadian" and report more incidents of discrimination (Reitz and Banerjee 2007, 490). The 2002 Ethnic Diversity Survey
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scott Gehlbach
    Scott Gehlbach University of Chicago https://scottgehlbach.net Department of Political Science [email protected] Harris School of Public Policy Twitter: @sgehlbach EDUCATION Ph.D. in Political Science and Economics, University of California{Berkeley, 2003 Mancur Olson Award for Best Dissertation in Field of Political Economy M.A. in Economics, University of California{Berkeley, 2000 M.A. in Political Science, University of California{Berkeley, 1998 M.B.A., University of Michigan, 1991, graduated with distinction B.S. in Agricultural Economics, University of Illinois, 1989, graduated summa cum laude PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS University of Chicago Professor, Department of Political Science and Harris School of Public Policy, 2019{ present Sciences Po Visiting Professor, Department of Economics, 2019{2020 University of Wisconsin{Madison Professor, Department of Political Science, 2011{2019 Director, Center for Russia, East Europe, and Central Asia, 2018{2019 Associate Chair, Department of Political Science, 2012{2015 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, 2008{2011 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, 2003{2008 Harvard University Visiting Professor, Department of Government, 2012 Senior Fellow, Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies, 2011{2012 International Center for the Study of Institutions and Development, Higher School of Economics, Moscow Senior Research Fellow, 2011{2014 Centre for Economic and Financial Research, New Economic School, Moscow Visiting Scholar, 2001{2003, 2007{2008 University of California{Berkeley Research Assistant, Survey Research Center, 1999{2001 Central European University, Prague and Budapest Research Associate, CEU Labor Project, 1995{1997 Stanford University Visiting Fellow, Center for International Security and Arms Control, 1996 Research Assistant, Center for International Security and Arms Control, 1996 1 Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences{Czech Republic Visiting Scholar, 1995{1996 Central Europe Institute, Prague Senior Consultant, 1994{1995 Office of Congressman Thomas W.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenneth F. Scheve, Jr. Department of Political Science Stanford
    Kenneth F. Scheve, Jr. Department of Political Science Stanford University 616 Serra Mall Encina Hall West, Room 409 Stanford, CA 94305-6044 Email: [email protected] Web: http://scheve-research.stanford.edu/ Telephone: +1 650 497 9790 Fax: +1 650 723 1808 EDUCATION Ph.D., Political Science, Harvard University, November 2000 B.A. (Highest Honors), Economics, University of Notre Dame, May 1990 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Stanford University, Stanford, California Professor of Political Science, 2012-current Senior Fellow, Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, 2013-current Director of The Europe Center, 2013-2018 Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut Professor of Political Science, 2006-2012 Professor of International & Area Studies, 2007-2012 Co-Director of Leitner Program in International & Comparative Political Economy, 2008-2012 Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Political Science, 2006-2009 Assistant Professor of Political Science, 2001-2004 University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan Associate Professor of Public Policy 2004-2006 Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Palo Alto, California Fellow, 2005-2006 London School of Economics, London, United Kingdom Visiting Research Associate, STICERD, Fall 2004 Bank of England, London, United Kingdom Research Fellow, International Economic Analysis Division, 2000-2001 DeLaSalle Education Center, Kansas City, Missouri Math Teacher, Alta Vista Alternative School, 1992 - 1994 Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., New York, New York Financial Analyst, Commercial Bank Group, 1990 - 1992 Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri Intern, Economic Research Department, Summer1989 GRANTS & AWARDS 2018 David A. Lake Award for best paper presented at the 2017 International Political Economy Society annual meeting for “The Economic Origins of Authoritarian Values: Evidence from Local Trade Shocks in the United Kingdom” 2017-2018 Weidenbaum Center on the Economy, Government, and Public Policy, Washington University in St.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vita
    Curriculum Vita ABHIJIT VINAYAK BANERJEE DEPARTMENT: Economics DATE OF BIRTH: February 21, 1961 CITIZENSHIP: Indian National United States Permanent Resident EDUCATION INSTITUTION DEGREE DATE Harvard University Ph.D. 1988 Jawaharlal University M.A. 1983 New Delhi, India University of Calcutta B.Sc. 1981 Calcutta, India TITLE OF DOCTORAL THESIS: Essays in Information Economics FELLOWSHIPS AND HONORS: Honorary Visiting Professor, Institute of Development Studies Kolkata, 2006 D. Gale Johnson Lecture, University of Chicago, 2006 Michael Wallerstein Award, American Political Science Association, 2006 IEPR Distinguished Lecture, University of Southern California, 2006 Member, Council of the Econometric Society, 2004- American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Fellow, 2004- Kuznets Lecture, 2004, Yale University National Institutes on Aging Grant “Health Care and Health Status in Rajasthan, India” sub-grant under “Economics of Aging,” 2004 - 2009 Romesh Chandra Dutt Lecturer, 2003, Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta. Distinguished Visitor, Washington University, St. Louis, 2003 National Science Foundation Grant “Inequality, Growth & Trade Polic,” 2002-2006 Malcolm Adeshesiah Award, 2001 Mahalanobis Memorial Medal, 2000, India Guggenheim Fellow, 2000 Fellow of the Econometric Society, 1996- Rev. 2/29/2008 National Science Foundation Grant, 1995-98 “Creativity Extension” of National Science Foundation Grant 1998-2000 MacArthur Foundation Grant under the Costs of Inequality Project, 1996-2002 Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellow, 1994-96 Institute for Policy Reform Junior Fellow, 1993 IRIS Scholar, 1993 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2003- Ford Foundation International Professor of Economics, M.I.T. 2003- Director, Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab, M.I.T. 1996-2003 Professor of Economics, M.I.T. 1994-1996 Associate Professor of Economics, M.I.T.
    [Show full text]
  • Scott Gehlbach
    Scott Gehlbach University of Chicago https://scottgehlbach.net Department of Political Science [email protected] Harris School of Public Policy Twitter: @sgehlbach EDUCATION Ph.D. in Political Science and Economics, University of California–Berkeley, 2003 Mancur Olson Award for Best Dissertation in Field of Political Economy M.A. in Economics, University of California–Berkeley, 2000 M.A. in Political Science, University of California–Berkeley, 1998 M.B.A., University of Michigan, 1991, graduated with distinction B.S. in Agricultural Economics, University of Illinois, 1989, graduated summa cum laude PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS University of Chicago Professor, Department of Political Science and Harris School of Public Policy, 2019– present Sciences Po Visiting Professor, Department of Economics, 2019–2020 University of Wisconsin–Madison Professor, Department of Political Science, 2011–2019 Director, Center for Russia, East Europe, and Central Asia, 2018–2019 Associate Chair, Department of Political Science, 2012–2015 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, 2008–2011 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, 2003–2008 Harvard University Visiting Professor, Department of Government, 2012 Senior Fellow, Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies, 2011–2012 International Center for the Study of Institutions and Development, Higher School of Economics, Moscow Senior Research Fellow, 2011–2014 Centre for Economic and Financial Research, New Economic School, Moscow Visiting Scholar, 2001–2003, 2007–2008 University of California–Berkeley Research Assistant, Survey Research Center, 1999–2001 Central European University, Prague and Budapest Research Associate, CEU Labor Project, 1995–1997 Stanford University Visiting Fellow, Center for International Security and Arms Control, 1996 Research Assistant, Center for International Security and Arms Control, 1996 1 Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences–Czech Republic Visiting Scholar, 1995–1996 Central Europe Institute, Prague Senior Consultant, 1994–1995 Office of Congressman Thomas W.
    [Show full text]
  • APSA-CP Newsletter of the Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association
    APSA-CP Newsletter of the Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association Volume 11, Issue 1 Winter 2000 Letter from the President Table of Contents American Imperialism in Comparative Politics Letter from the President 1 Michael Wallerstein Symposium Northwestern University The New Political Economy [email protected] of Decentralization and Federalism Comparative politics is under assault. Scholars armed Introduction with quantitative technologies and schooled in the research Daniel Treisman 4 tradition dominant in American politics have invaded our A Comparative Theory turf. Signs of the onslaught abound. Comparativists com- Of Federal Economic Performance plain that the American Political Science Review only pub- Barry R. Weingast 5 lishes the type of comparative article that an Americanist Fiscal Federalism in would write. World Politics, long the bastion of traditional Developing Economies scholarship in comparative politics and international rela- Robert P. Inman 10 tions, increasingly publishes articles containing tables of re- The Economics and gression coefficients. Young scholars must traverse a mine- Politics of Federalism field to get tenure. The best scholars using non-quantitative Susan Rose-Ackerman16 methods are vulnerable to the sort of tenure letter that says Formal Theory and so-and-so is very good at he does, but what he does is not Federalism "cutting edge work." At the same time, the best young schol- Jenna Bednar 19 ars using quantitative methods are vulnerable to the sort of Decentralization and tenure letter that says so-and-so may know something Hard Budget Constraints about game theory, but she doesn't know anything about Jennie Litvack Argentine (or French or Chinese) politics.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Department of Political Science
    A HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Los ANGELES 1920,1987 Winston W Crouch, .Professor Emeritus The Department of Political Science, Los Angeles, June 1987 ., A HISTORY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Los ANGELES Winston W. Crouch, Professor Emeritus ··1 :, The Department of Political Science, Los Angeles, June 1987 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Several persons contributed to the preparation of this departmental history. In i addition to Chairman Richard Sisson, Professors Richard Baum, Robert Fried, Douglas Hobbs, Andrzej Korbonski, Charles Nixon, and Ronald Rogowski gave very helpful counsel and suggestions at various stages of the project. Professor Emeritus J.A.C. Grant provided information regarding some of the earlier years. Clare Walker's (Departmental Management Services Officer) knowledge of de­ partmental personnel and its records was invaluable. Becky Carrera (Administra­ tive Assistant) was similarly helpful. Moreover, she put the manuscript on the computer. Barbara Jess (Graduate Counselor) provided the information about the Ph.D. graduates. Vicki Waldman (Undergraduate Counselor) helped with some points about the undergraduates, and James Bondurant (Curriculum Coordinator) supplied enrollment figures. Daniel Rodriguez, an undergraduate research assistant, combed the Law Library references for departmental graduates who serve in the state and federal judiciaries. Dorothy Wells, of the Public Affairs Section of the University Research Library, also provided bibliographic assistance frequently. All their efforts are greatly appreciated. w.w.c. I. I TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword (Richard Sisson) . iii : . lI' History Narrative The Southern Branch Period, 1920-192 7 . 2 Development of a University Department, 1928-1940 ............... 7 World War II, 1940-1946 .
    [Show full text]
  • 7976-1 Comparative Political Economy (Kim)
    © Wonik Kim POLI 7976 Comparative Political Economy THE POLITICS OF GROWTH AND INEQUALITY IN THE CAPITAL-NATION-STATE Monday 12:00 – 2:50 pm, fall 2015, 0001 Hatcher Hall Wonik Kim, [email protected], 225-578-5354 OH: 12:20 – 1:20 pm on Tuesday and Thursday, or by appointment Stubbs 229, Department of Political Science The leitmotif of this seminar is the politics of growth and inequality in the capitalist system. Traditional political economy studied this topic, by assuming that environments and political institutions are given and neutral with regard to the market allocations; they are there but they do not act. New political economy differs from the traditional approach in its treatment of politics. It accepts that political institutions and their relations to the economy and society are populated by actors who have interests/ideologies/faiths and pursue them. Hence, this course is based on the belief that socioeconomic development is fundamentally a political phenomenon. Another firm belief is that the politics of growth and inequality should be understood in terms of capitalism historically embedded in particular conditions. A warning: political scientists cannot study political economy without knowing some sort of economics, as we cannot study political history without dealing with history. So, we will study economic theories and formulations as well. The first part of the course examines the fundamentals of the capitalist system – the system of “the trinity of the capital-nation-state” (Karatani 2014), by reading Polanyi, Schumpeter, Gramsci, and Marx (mostly as a political observer, not as an economist). The second part provides a critical evaluation (with some methodological comment) of the main theories and empirics of the politics of inequality under the so-called “advanced” capitalist democracies.
    [Show full text]
  • And Gov Implicatio and Future the Clinton Presidency
    and Gov and Future Implicatio the Clinton Presidency ouis Fisher, Mark J. Roze, % W. Sonner, Robert J. Spftzer, ten J. Wayne, and Clyde Wi'lcox il Scientist in Germany, 1945 Gabriel A. Almond M O. Keohane: The Study of International Relations Peter Gourevitch Is this how you measure the performance of vour statistics SURVEY METHODS Sampling weights, multistage cluster sampling, stratification, 00:03.060 Linear regression: 200,000 observations, 10 covariates * sampling without replacement, linearization variance estimator, deff means, 00:01.5V0 Sort: 100,000 observations by 25 variables (10 megabytes), 3 keys» proportions, ratios, totals, two-way contingency tables, linear regression, tobit, 00: OS. 123 Proportional hazards regression: 10,000 observations, 10 covariates' instrumental variables, logit, probit, multinomial logit, ordered logit, and more ' 350 mhz Pentium II running Stata for Windows 98 TIME SERIES correlograms, periodograms, ARIMA, ARCH/GARCH, white-noise tests, unit root tests, and more With Stata, speed is only the beginning. NONPARAMETRIC METHODS Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon signed ranks, Kruskal-Wallis, Spearman and Kendall correlations, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, LINEAR MODELS regression, ANOVA, instrumental variables, three-stage least exact binomial confidence intervals, and more squares, constrained regression, tobit, interval regression, Heckman selection model, Newey-West, quantile regression, robust variance estimates, and more MULTIVARIATE METHODS factor analysis, canonical correlation, multivariate regression, and
    [Show full text]
  • Philanthropy, Voluntarism, and Nonprofit Organizations
    Institute for Policy Research 2002-2003 • Northwestern University Year in Review Message from the Director As I write this message, I am struck by how much the Institute for Policy Research (IPR) has—and has not changed—since its beginnings 35 years ago. Established as the Center for Urban Affairs in 1968 on the heels of a tumultuous era, IPR’s early activities reflected the national concerns of the times and their explosive urban problems. In the intervening years, our name has changed, our faculty has grown, and our research emphases have Abroadened, but our commitment to the highest standards of academic excellence has not. Thanks to our interdisciplinary focus and our steadfast commitment to excellence, our faculty have continued to combine policy relevance with significant contributions in many academic fields—from economics to sociology and psychology, from political science to law and education. Faculty: Currently, IPR faculty fellows and associates are working on 73 externally funded research projects in one of our eight broadly defined areas (see p. 4). Our commitment to excellence is mirrored by the accolades they receive. Since 2002, for example, we have three faculty who received Fulbrights, five named to chairs, and two members inducted into the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. This is in addition to our faculty’s awards for their research, books, and papers (see p. 29). Given their widely regarded expertise, they are also often invited to serve on public committees and task forces, such as the task force for Chicago public schools, the National Research Council’s committee Fay Lomax Cook, Director on illegal drug use, and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Princeton University
    Marco Battaglini Department of Economics, Cornell University, Uris Hall, Ithaca, NY 14850. Phone: (607)-255-3052, E-mail: [email protected] Web Page: http://www.mbattaglini.com Education and Military Service 1991-1995, Laurea Universita' Bocconi, Economics. 1995-1997, Lieutenant (mandatory military service), Guardia di Finanza – General Headquarters, Ministry of Finance, Rome. 1997-2000, Ph.D. Northwestern University, Economics. Employment 2015-present Edward H. Meyer Professor of Economics, Cornell University 2007-2015 Professor of Economics, Princeton University 2001-2006 Assistant Professor of Economics, Princeton University. 2012 Visiting Professor, Institute for Advanced Studies 2011 Visiting professor, Yale University 2006 Visiting professor, Kellogg School of Business. 2002-2003, Visiting Assistant Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2000-2001, Lecturer, Princeton University. Editorial and other Activities Games and Economic Behavior: editor, September 2014-present. Econometrica: associate editor, 2007-2017 Director of the William S. Dietrich II Economic Theory Center, Princeton University, 2012-2015. Review of Economic Studies: foreign editor, 2008-2014 1 Journal of Economic Theory: associate editor 2008-2013 Honors, Fellowships and Awards. 2018 Elected Fellow of the Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory. 2014 Elected Fellow of the Econometric Society. 2009 Carlo Alberto Medal, awarded to an Italian economist under the age of 40 for his/her outstanding research contributions to the field of economics. 2009 Michael Wallerstein award from the American Political Science Association for best article published in 2008 in the area of political economy (jointly awarded with Stephen Coate). 2006 Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellow. 2005 NSF CAREER Award: “A Legislative Theory of public Spending, Debt and Taxation.” 2005 Kenneth Arrow Prize in Economics for Junior Faculty.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Miriam A. Golden
    July 31, 2020 Curriculum Vitae Miriam A. Golden Homepage: https://miriamgolden.com Email: [email protected] Department of Political and Social Sciences Direct: +39-055-4685-207 European University Institute Assistant: +30-055-4685-349 via dei Roccettini, 9 Fax: +39-055-4685-207 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy Education • Ph.D. in Government, Cornell University, 1983 • M.A. in Government, Cornell University, 1979 • A.B. in Political Science, University of California at Berkeley, with High Honors and Distinction in General Scholarship, 1976 • General Course in Political Theory, London School of Economics and Political Science, 1973– 74 Academic Positions • Peter Mair Chair in Comparative Politics, European University Institute, 2019– • Research Professor, 2020–23, University of California at Los Angeles. Professor Emerita 2019– 20. Professor 1994–2019. Associate Professor 1993–94. Assistant Professor 1989–93 • Assistant Professor of Government, Wesleyan University, 1984–89 • Assistant Professor of Political Science, University of New Mexico, 1983–84 • Lecturer in Government, Cornell University, 1982. Teaching Assistant 1977–79. Administrative Appointments • Vice Chair for Graduate Studies, Department of Political Science, University of California at Los Angeles, 2009–10 and 2012–14 • Founding Director, Center for Comparative and Global Research, International Studies and Overseas Programs, University of California at Los Angeles, 2000–04 Miriam A. Golden 2 Fellowships and Affiliations • Special invitee, J-PAL Governance Initiative, 2017– • Research Fellow in Political Economy, Center for Economic Research in Pakistan (CERP), 2017— • Member, Evidence in Governance and Politics (EGAP), 2014— • Faculty Affiliate, Center for Effective Global Action (CEGA), University of California at Berke- ley, 2013— • Fellow, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, 2018–19 • Associate Member, Nuffield College, University of Oxford, 2017–20, April 2016–April 2017, and summer 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Sponsorship and the Development of Rebel Parties
    FOREIGN SPONSORSHIP AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF REBEL PARTIES Michael C. Marshall Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 2015 APPROVED: John Ishiyama, Major Professor Idean Salehyan, Committee Member Jacqueline DeMeritt, Committee Member T. David Mason, Committee Member Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha, Chair of the Department of Political Science Marshall, Michael C. Foreign Sponsorship and the Development of Rebel Parties. Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science), December 2015, 208 pp., 17 tables, 6 figures, references, 287 titles. This dissertation examines the emergence, survival, performance, and national impact of rebel parties following negotiated settlements. Building on a growing literature examining the environmental and organizational factors affecting insurgent-to-party transformations, this dissertation asks why some insurgent organizations thrive as political parties in post-conflict environments and others fail to make such a transformation. I propose that foreign actors play a pivotal role in the formation of what I call “protégé parties,” which are better equipped to make the transformation into political parties than other rebel groups. Further, different kinds of sponsors have varying effects on transformation. Empirical analysis supports these propositions, finding that protégé parties with authoritarian sponsorship are better equipped to develop than those backed by democracies or no one. Copyright 2015 By Michael C. Marshall ! ii! ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am eternally indebted to the following individuals and institutions for their assistance: I wish to thank my family. I would not have succeeded without your unwavering support. I am grateful to the Department of Political Science, American Political Science Review, and the Toulouse Graduate School. I could not have completed this project without your generous financial support.
    [Show full text]