DOCSLIB.ORG

Checklist of Nordic Collembola with Notes on Habitat Preferences and Presence/Absence in Individual Countries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Checklist of Nordic Collembola with Notes on Habitat Preferences and Presence/Absence in Individual Countries Checklist of Nordic Collembola With notes on habitat preferences and presence/absence in individual countries. Arne Fjellberg (Updated February 2007) A: Arctic islands of Norway D: Denmark Fa: Faroe Islands Fi: Finland I: Iceland N: Norway S: Sweden Subclass ARTHROPLEONA Marine littoral. Few records (D). Hypogastrura manubrialis (Tullberg, 1869) Section Poduromorpha Compost, organic debris. Uncommon (D,Fi,I,S). Hypogastrura vernalis (Carl, 1901) Dry seashore meadows. Common (D,Fi,N,S). Hypogastrura purpurescens (Lubbock, 1867) Poduridae Compost, seashores and rich soil. Common (D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S) Hypogastrura distincta (Axelson, 1902) Podura aquatica Linné, 1758 Compost, garden soil. Rare (Fi). Wetlands, ponds. Widespread (D,Fi,S,N) Hypogastrura socialis (Uzel, 1891) Inland coniferous forest floor, often on snow. Boeal (Fi,N,S). Hypogastrura sahlbergi (Reuter, 1895) Hypogastruridae Wetlands, seashores. Scattered records (Fi,N,S). Hypogastrura lapponica (Axelson, 1902) Choreutinula inermis (Tullberg, 1871) On bark of trees, on snow in winter. Northern (Fi,N,S). Coniferous forest, in bark and litter. Common (Fi,N,S). Choreutinula kulla Fjellberg, 2007 Ceratophysella longispina (Tullberg, 1876) Sand/gravel meadows near sea. Uncommon (N,S) Wet arctic tundra (A). Ceratophysella granulata Stach, 1949 Schoettella ununguiculata (Tullberg, 1869) Rich forest soil, rare (D,N). Forest, meadows, seashores. Common (D,Fi,N,S). Ceratophysella scotica (Carpenter & Evans, 1899) Damp habitats, most common in mountains (D,Fi,N,S). Hypogastrura tullbergi (Schäffer, 1900) Ceratophysella bengtssoni (Ågren, 1904) Various arctic tundra, often dry (A). Compost and humus-rich soil. Common (D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S). Hypogastrura concolor (Carpenter, 1900) Ceratophysella denticulata (Bagnall, 1941) Various arctic tundra, often humid (A). Humid habitats, rich soil. Very common (D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S). Hypogastrura sensilis (Folsom, 1919) Ceratophysella engadinensis (Gisin, 1949) Wet arctic habitats, seashores. Rare (A). Various soils. Rare (D,Fa,Fi). Hypogastrura litoralis (Linnaniemi, 1907) Ceratophysella succinea Gisin, 1949 Wet habitats, seashores. Scattered records (D,Fi,S). Various soils, mostly seashores. Widely distributed Hypogastrura viatica (Tullberg, 1872) (A,Fi,I,N,S). Marine littoral, often abundant in wrack beds Ceratophysella gibbosa (Bagnall, 1940) (A,D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S). Compost, introduced species. Rare (N). Hypogastrura arctandria Fjellberg, 1988 Wrack on sandy beaches. West coast (I,N). Schaefferia willemi (Bonet, 1930) Hypogastrura assimilis Krausbauer, 1898 Rich forest soil, rotten wood, gardens. Scattered records (N). Meadows and grasslands, often manured (D,Fi,I,N,S). Hypogastrura neglecta (Börner, 1901) Bonetogastrura variabilis Christiansen, 1951 Humus rich soil, gardens. Rare (Fi,S). Hypogastrura serrata (Ågren, 1904) Arctic birdcliffs (A). Humus rich soil, compost. Rare (Fa,I,S). Bonetogastrura nivalis (Martynova, 1973) Hypogastrura gisini Strenzke, 1954 Arctic tundra, rich soil (A). 2 Mesogastrura libyca (Caroli, 1914) Sandy seashores. Scattered records (D,I,N,S). Soil & litter. Rare, introduced (S). Friesea danica Fjelberg, 1998 Sand dunes alond seashores, rare (D) Mesachorutes quadriocellatus Absolon, 1900 Friesea quinquespinosa Wahlgren, 1900 Bird nest in hollow tree, rare (D). Rich tundra sites, bird cliffs (A) Friesea sublimis Macnamara, 1921 Xenylla humicola (Fabricius, 1780) Compost, introduced (N). Rich organic soils, mostly seashores (A,D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S). Xenylla mucronata Axelson, 1903 Pseudachorutella asigillata (Börner, 1901) Coniferous forest litter, boreal (Fi,S) Forest litter, under bark. Scattered records (D,Fi,N,S). Xenylla boerneri Axelson, 1905 Moss on trees and rocks, forest litter (D,Fi,N,S). Pseudachorutes dubius Krausbauer, 1898 Xenylla acauda Gisin, 1947 Forest litter, common (D,Fi,N,S). Sandy, dry beach meadows, uncommon (D,N,S). Pseudachorutes subcrassus Tullberg, 1871 Xenylla tullbergi Börner, 1903 Forest litter, common (D,Fi,N,S). Forest litter, meadows, dead trees. Rare (N). Pseudachorutes parvulus Börner, 1901 Xenylla brevicauda Tullberg, 1869 Mostly under bark, dead trees. Common (D,Fi,I,N,S). Coniferous forest litter. Boreal (Fi,N,S). Pseudachorutes boerneri Schött, 1902 Xenylla maritima Tullberg, 1869 Moss/lichens on live trees. Scattered records (N,S). Common in dry, exposed habitats (D,Fi,N,S). Pseudachorutes corticicolus Schäffer, 1896 Xenylla xavieri Gama, 1959 Under bark, also forest litter. Common (D,Fi,N,S). Dry, warm meadows & rocks. Uncommon (D,Fa,N,S). Xenylla mediterranea Gama, 1964 Pratanuriuda cassagnaui Rusek, 1973 Dry meadows, rocks, seashores. Uncommon (D,N,S). Dry beach meadows, rare (S). Xenylla corticalis Börner, 1901 Under bark, dead trees. Widely distributed (Fi,N,S). Micranurida granulata (Agrell, 1943) Xenylla grisea Axelson, 1900 Forest litter, deep soil. Scattered records (D,Fi,N,S). Rich soil, dead trees. (D,Fi,N,S). Micranurida pygmaea (Börner, 1901) Common in various soil types (A,D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S). Willemia anophthalma Börner, 1901 Micranurida balta Fjellberg, 1998 Common in meadows, forest litter, acidic soils Sand dunes, seashores. Rare (D,S). (A,D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S). Micranurida sensillata (Gisin, 1953) Willemia intermedia Mills, 1934 Meadows, forest litter. Rare (D). Meadows, seashores. Scattered records (A,D,Fi,N,S). Micranurida forsslundi Gisin, 1949 Willemia similis Mills, 1934 Acidic soils in forest and heaths. Common (D,Fa,Fi,N,S). Tundra soils. (A,I). Micranurida anophthalmica Stach, 1949 Willemia scandinavica Stach, 1949 Moss on rotten wood. Rare (S). Mostly sandy seashore habitats, also tundra (A,Fa,D,I,N,S). Willemia denisi Mills, 1932 Anuridella marina Willem, 1906 Forest litter. Common (D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S). Marine littoral. Uncommon, west coast (N) Willemia multilobata Gers & Deharveng, 1985 Anuridella submarina Bagnall, 1934 Meadows, rare (D) Marine littoral, interstitial. Uncommon (I,N) Willemia unispina Fjellberg, 2007 Anuridella immsiana Bagnall, 1939 Rich hardwood forest. Rare, west coast. (N) Marine littoral. Rare (I) Anurida ellipsoides Stach, 1949 Brachystomellidae Damp forest habitats, streambanks. Rare (Fi,N,S). Anurida uniformis Gisin, 1953 Brachystomella parvula (Schäffer, 1896) Damp forest, streambanks. Rare (N,S). Damp meadows, sometimes in forests (D,Fi,N,S). Anurida denisi Bagnall, 1939 Under stones in the marine littoral. Rare (N) Anurida maritima (Guérin, 1836) Neanuridae Marine littoral. Common (A,N,S). Anurida granaria (Nicolet, 1847) Friesea mirabilis (Tullberg, 1871) Seashores and stream banks (A,D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S). Common in meadows, forests, seashores (D,Fa,Fi,I, N,S). Anurida thalassophila (Bagnall, 1939) Friesea truncata Cassagnau, 1958 Marine littoral, often uder stones. Common (D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S). Forests, meadows. Common (D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S). Anurida polaris (Hammer, 1954) Friesea claviseta Axelson, 1900 Wet arctic & alpine tundra (A,N,S). Bark on trees, also moss on rocks. Common (D,Fi,I,N,S). Anurida alpina Agrell, 1939 Friesea baltica Szeptycki, 1964 Damp alpine habitats, along streams. Rare (N,S). 3 Anurida tullbergi Schött, 1901 Thalassaphorura debilis (Moniez, 1890) Wetlands along sea and lakes, uncommon (D,Fi,I,N). Common in the marine littoral (A,D,I,N). Thalassaphorura duplopunctata (Strenzke, 1954) Paranura sexpunctata Axelson, 1902 Seashores & bird cliffs, mainly Arctic (A,Fa,I,N,F). Under bark, dead treas. Uncommon, boreal (Fi,N,S). Thalassaphorura halophila (Bagnall, 1935) Marine littoral, wrack beds. Rare (N,S). Deutonura stachi (Gisin, 1952) Thalassaphorura encarpata (Denis, 1931) Rich hardwood forest. Rare (N). Greenhouse, introduced. Rare (N) Neanura muscorum (Templeton, 1835) Protaphorura armata (Tullberg, 1869) Common, various habitats (D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S). Forests and meadows, often in dry habitats (D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S). Neanura reticulata Axelson, 1905 Protaphorura tricampata (Gisin, 1956) Wet habitats. Rare, boreal (Fi,S). Meadows, mostly seashores. Widespread (D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S). Neanura coronifera Axelson, 1905 Protaphorura subuliginata Gisin, 1956 Old records only, identity unclear (Fi). Forest litter, meadow, seashores. Common (D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S). Protaphorura cancellata (Gisin, 1952) Meadows, forest litter. Scattered records (D,I,N,S). Odontellidae Protaphorura boedvarssoni Pomorski, 1993 Forest litter, meadows, lake shores. Few records Xenyllodes armatus Axelson, 1903 (D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S). Protaphorura vanderdrifti Gisin, 1952 Forest litter, streambanks, seashores. Common (D,Fi,I,N,S). Mostly seashores. Few records (D,Fa,I,N,S). Axenyllodes echinatus Fjellberg, 1988 Protaphorura pseudovanderdrifti (Gisin, 1957) Forest litter, meadows. Common in the alpine (D,Fa,Fi,I,N,S). Dry, sandy meadows. Rare (N). Protaphorura humata Gisin, 1952 Pseudostachia populosa (Selga, 1963) Seashores. Rare (N). Protaphorura pannonica Haybach, 1960 Dry, sandy seashore meadows. Rare (D,S). Forest litter, seashores. Few records (D,Fa,Fi,I,S). Odontella lamellifera (Axelson, 1903) Protaphorura procampata (Gisin, 1956) Meadows, forest litter, seashores. Widespread (D,Fa,I,N,S). Under bark, in forest litter. Rare (D,Fi,S). Protaphorura campata (Gisin, 1952) Meadows. Rare (I) Onychiuridae Protaphorura bicampata (Gisin, 1956) Seashores, meadows, often dry. Widesprea (D,Fa,I,N,S). Protaphorura islandica (Bödvarsson, 1959) Archaphorura serratotuberculata (Stach, 1933) Seashore meadows and wrack beds. Uncommon (D,I,N). Forest litter. Scattered records (D,Fi,N). Protaphorura fimata (Gisin, 1952) Compost, seashore debris. Few records (D,Fi,I,N,F). Micraphorura absoloni (Börner, 1901) Protaphorura macfadyeni
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Why Are There So Many Exotic Springtails in Australia? a Review
    90 (3) · December 2018 pp. 141–156 Why are there so many exotic Springtails in Australia? A review. Penelope Greenslade1, 2 1 Environmental Management, School of School of Health and Life Sciences, Federation University, Ballarat, Victoria 3353, Australia 2 Department of Biology, Australian National University, GPO Box, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia E-mail: [email protected] Received 17 October 2018 | Accepted 23 November 2018 Published online at www.soil-organisms.de 1 December 2018 | Printed version 15 December 2018 DOI 10.25674/y9tz-1d49 Abstract Native invertebrate assemblages in Australia are adversely impacted by invasive exotic plants because they are replaced by exotic, invasive invertebrates. The reasons have remained obscure. The different physical, chemical and biotic characteristics of the novel habitat seem to present hostile conditions for native species. This results in empty niches. It seems the different ecologies of exotic invertebrate species may be better adapted to colonise these novel empty niches than native invertebrates. Native faunas of other southern continents that possess a highly endemic fauna, such as South America, South Africa and New Zealand, may have suffered the same impacts from exotic species but insufficient survey data and unreliable and old taxonomy makes this uncertain. Here I attempt to discover what particular characteristics of these novel habitats are hostile to native invertebrates. I chose the Collembola as a target taxon. They are a suitable group because the Australian collembolan fauna consists of a high percentage of endemic taxa, but also exotic, non-native, species. Most exotic Collembola species in Australia appear to have originated from Europe, where they occur at low densities (Fjellberg 1997, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Springtails (Collembola) from the Republic of Moldova
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © Décembre Vol. LIII pp. 149–160 «Grigore Antipa» 2010 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-010-0011-x CHECKLIST OF SPRINGTAILS (COLLEMBOLA) FROM THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA GALINA BUªMACHIU Abstract. The checklist of Collembola from the Republic of Moldova including 223 species is presented. The list is based on literature sources and personal collecting. Résumé. Ce travail présente la liste des 223 espèces de collemboles de la République de Moldova. Cette liste fut réalisée en utilisant des références littéraires et des collections personnelles. Key words: Collembola, checklist, Republic of Moldova. INTRODUCTION The records on Collembola from the Republic of Moldova started about 50 years ago with the first two species included by Martynova in “The key to insects of the European part of the USSR. Collembola” (1964). Some more information on species diversity of Collembola from the soil of Moldavian vineyards was included in Stegãrescu’s work (1967). During the last twenty years, this group has been studied more systematically, with more than 200 species recorded (Buºmachiu 2001, 2004, 2006 a, b, 2008). Since 2002, eleven species new to science were described from the Republic of Moldova by da Gama & Buºmachiu (2002, 2004); Buºmachiu & Deharveng (2008) and Buºmachiu & Weiner (2008). Until now, the faunistic data on Collembola from the Republic of Moldova have not been summarised in the form of a checklist. The present paper includes the complete list of Collembola from the Republic of Moldova using the modern nomenclature. Totally, 223 species are listed. Some problematic and dubious species, such as Pseudanurida clysmae Jackson, 1927, Onychiurus fimetarius (Linnaeus, 1758) and Orchesella divergens Handschin, 1929 recorded by Stegãrescu (1967) and Pseudosinella wahlgrei Börner, 1907, are not included in the list.
    [Show full text]
  • Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report
    Geography Monograph Series No. 13 Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. Brisbane, 2009 The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. is a non-profit organization that promotes the study of Geography within educational, scientific, professional, commercial and broader general communities. Since its establishment in 1885, the Society has taken the lead in geo- graphical education, exploration and research in Queensland. Published by: The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. 237 Milton Road, Milton QLD 4064, Australia Phone: (07) 3368 2066; Fax: (07) 33671011 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rgsq.org.au ISBN 978 0 949286 16 8 ISSN 1037 7158 © 2009 Desktop Publishing: Kevin Long, Page People Pty Ltd (www.pagepeople.com.au) Printing: Snap Printing Milton (www.milton.snapprinting.com.au) Cover: Pemberton Design (www.pembertondesign.com.au) Cover photo: Cravens Peak. Photographer: Nick Rains 2007 State map and Topographic Map provided by: Richard MacNeill, Spatial Information Coordinator, Bush Heritage Australia (www.bushheritage.org.au) Other Titles in the Geography Monograph Series: No 1. Technology Education and Geography in Australia Higher Education No 2. Geography in Society: a Case for Geography in Australian Society No 3. Cape York Peninsula Scientific Study Report No 4. Musselbrook Reserve Scientific Study Report No 5. A Continent for a Nation; and, Dividing Societies No 6. Herald Cays Scientific Study Report No 7. Braving the Bull of Heaven; and, Societal Benefits from Seasonal Climate Forecasting No 8. Antarctica: a Conducted Tour from Ancient to Modern; and, Undara: the Longest Known Young Lava Flow No 9. White Mountains Scientific Study Report No 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Collembola, Symphypleona, Bourletiellidae) Do Brasil, Com Uma Filogenia Do Gênero Baseada Na Morfologia
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA CAMPUS V – MINISTRO ALCIDES CARNEIRO CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS E SOCIAIS APLICADAS CURSO DE BACHARELADO EM CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS DIEGO DIAS DA SILVA UM NOVO STENOGNATHRIOPES (COLLEMBOLA, SYMPHYPLEONA, BOURLETIELLIDAE) DO BRASIL, COM UMA FILOGENIA DO GÊNERO BASEADA NA MORFOLOGIA. JOÃO PESSOA – PB 2011 DIEGO DIAS DA SILVA UM NOVO STENOGNATHRIOPES (COLLEMBOLA, SYMPHYPLEONA, BOURLETIELLIDAE) DO BRASIL, COM UMA FILOGENIA DO GÊNERO BASEADA NA MORFOLOGIA. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso apresentado ao Curso de Bacharelado em Ciências Biológicas da Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, em cumprimento das exigências para a obtenção do grau de Bacharel em Ciências Biológicas. Orientador: Dr. Douglas Zeppelini Filho João Pessoa – PB 2011 F ICHA CATALOGRÁFICA ELABORADA PELA BIBLIOTECA SETORIAL CAMPUS V – UEPB S586n Silva, Diego Dias da. Um novo Stenognathriopes (Collembola, Symphypleona, Bourletiellidae) do Brasil, com uma filogenia do gênero baseada na morfologia / Diego Dias da Silva. – 2011. 53f. : il. color Digitado. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Ciências Biológicas) – Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e Sociais Aplicadas, 2011. “Orientação: Prof. Dr. Douglas Zeppelini Filho, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas”. 1. Collembola. 2. Morfologia comparativa. 3. Stenognathriopes. I. Título. 21. ed. CDD 595.725 UM NOVO STENOGNATHRIOPES (COLLEMBOLA, SYMPHYPLEONA, BOURLETIELLIDAE) DO BRASIL, COM UMA FILOGENIA DO GÊNERO BASEADA NA MORFOLOGIA. Diego Dias da Silva1 RESUMO Uma nova espécie do subgênero Stenognathriopes (Tenentiella), Collembola, Bourletiellidae, da vegetação litorânea do estado da Paraíba, Nordeste do Brasil, é descrita. Os espécimes analisados foram coletados a partir de amostras de folhiço e solo superficial processadas em funil de Berlese-Tullgren. A nova espécie é o primeiro registro do gênero Stenognathriopes para o Brasil.
    [Show full text]
  • Awenda Provincial Park
    AWENDA PROVINCIAL PARK One Malaise trap was deployed at Awenda Provincial Park in 2014 (44.82534, -79.98458, 231m ASL; Figure 1). This trap collected arthropods for twenty weeks from April 29 – September 19, 2014. All 10 Malaise trap samples were processed; every other sample was analyzed using the individual specimen protocol while the second half was analyzed via bulk analysis. A total of 3029 BINs were obtained. Over half the BINs captured were flies (Diptera), followed by bees, ants and wasps (Hymenoptera), moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera), and true bugs (Hemiptera; Figure 2). In total, 595 arthropod species were named, representing 21.3% of the BINs from the Figure 1. Malaise trap deployed at Awenda Provincial site (Appendix 1). All the BINs were assigned at least Park in 2014. to family, and 54% were assigned to a genus (Appendix 2). Specimens collected from Awenda represent 214 different families and 705 genera. Diptera Hymenoptera Lepidoptera Hemiptera Coleoptera Trombidiformes Sarcoptiformes Psocodea Mesostigmata Araneae Entomobryomorpha Mecoptera Symphypleona Trichoptera Neuroptera Thysanoptera Dermaptera Pseudoscorpiones Stylommatophora Odonata Opiliones Orthoptera Figure 2. Taxonomy breakdown of BINs captured in the Malaise trap at Awenda. APPENDIX 1. TAXONOMY REPORT Class Order Family Genus Species Arachnida Araneae Agelenidae Agelenopsis Clubionidae Clubiona Clubiona kastoni Dictynidae Emblyna Emblyna sublata Linyphiidae Ceraticelus Ceraticelus atriceps Ceraticelus fissiceps Ceratinella Ceratinella brunnea Ceratinops
    [Show full text]
  • Collembola of Canada 187 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.819.23653 REVIEW ARTICLE Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 819: 187–195 (2019) Collembola of Canada 187 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.819.23653 REVIEW ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Collembola of Canada Matthew S. Turnbull1, Sophya Stebaeva2 1 Unaffiliated, Kingston, Ontario, Canada2 The Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Aca- demy of Sciences, Leninskii pr. 33, Moscow 119071, Russia Corresponding author: Matthew S. Turnbull ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Langor | Received 16 January 2018 | Accepted 8 May 2018 | Published 24 January 2019 http://zoobank.org/3A331779-19A1-41DA-AFCF-81AAD4CB049F Citation: Turnbull MS, Stebaeva S (2019) Collembola of Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 187–195.https://doi. org/10.3897/zookeys.819.23653 Abstract The state of knowledge of diversity of Collembola in Canada was assessed by examination of literature and DNA barcode data. There are 474 described extant Collembola species known from Canada, a significant change compared to the 520 species estimated to occur in Canada in 1979 (Richards 1979) and the 341 reported in the most recent national checklist (Skidmore 1993). Given the number of indeterminate or cryptic species records, the dearth of sampling in many regions, and the growing use of genetic biodiversity assessment methods such as Barcode Index Numbers, we estimate the total diversity of Collembola in Canada to be approximately 675 species. Advances in Collembola systematics and Canadian research are discussed. Keywords biodiversity assessment, Biota of Canada, Collembola, springtails Collembola, commonly known as springtails, is a class of small, entognathous, wing- less hexapods that is a sister group to Insecta.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • (Collembola) in Meadows, Pastures and Road Verges in Central Finland
    © Entomologica Fennica. 29 August 2017 Springtails (Collembola) in meadows, pastures and road verges in Central Finland Atte Komonen* & Saana Kataja-aho Komonen, A. & Kataja-aho, S. 2017: Springtails (Collembola) in meadows, pas- tures and road verges in Central Finland. — Entomol. Fennica 28: 157–163. Understanding of species distribution, abundance and habitat affinities is crucial for red-list assessment, conservation and habitat management. In Central Fin- land, we studied Collembola in three habitat types, namely non-grazed meadows, pastures and road verges using pitfall traps. Altogether, 9,630 Collembola indi- viduals were recorded. These belonged to 12 families, 34 genera and 60 species. The number of specimens was clearly higher in meadows than in pastures or road verges. The number of species, however, was higher in meadows and road verges (40 and 39 species, respectively) than in pastures (33 species). The overall spe- cies number is comparable to other large-scale sampling schemes in similar habi- tats. We recorded a few abundant species (Spatulosminthurus flaviceps, Smin- thurus viridis and Sminthurus nigromaculatus) that have been previously re- corded from very different biotopes. In conclusion, biodiversity inventories of soil fauna, as well as other biota, should also include marginal habitats, which of- ten host peculiar communities. A. Komonen, University of Jyväskylä, Department of Biological and Environ- mental Science, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland; *Cor- responding author’s e-mail: [email protected] S. Kataja-aho, University of Jyväskylä, Natural History Museum, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland; E-mail: [email protected] Received 15 November 2016, accepted 22 December 2016 1.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Springtail Fauna of Hungary (Hexapoda: Collembola)
    Opusc. Zool. Budapest, (2007) 2008, 38: 3–82. An annotated checklist of the springtail fauna of Hungary (Hexapoda: Collembola) 1 2 L. DÁNYI and GY. TRASER Abstract. A checklist of the species of springtails (Hexapoda: Collembola) hitherto recorded from Hungary is presented. Each entry is accompanied by complete references, and remarks where appropriate. The present list contains 414 species. he Collembola fauna of several countries in critical review of the literature data of Collembola T the world was already overwied in the recent referring to Hungary. past (e.g. Babenko & Fjellberg 2006, Culik & Zeppelini Filho 2003, Skidmore 1995, Waltz & HISTORY Hart 1996, Zhao et al. 1997). The importance of such catalogues was stressed by several authors The first records of Collembola referring to (e.g. Csuzdi et al, 2006: 2) and their topicality is Hungary are some notes on the mass occurrence indicated also by the fact that several cheklists of certain species (Frenzel 1673, Mollerus 1673, referring even to European states were published Steltzner 1881), which however, are without any most recently (e.g. Fiera (2007) on Romania, taxonomical or faunistical value, as it has already Juceviča (2003) on Latvia, Kaprus et al. (2004) on been pointed out by Stach (1922, 1929). The next the Ukrain, Skarzynskiet al. (2002) on Poland). In springtail reference to Hungary is to be found in spite of these facts, the last comprehensive article the zoological book of János Földy (1801), which on the Hungarian springtail fauna was published was the first time the group was mentioned in about 80 years ago (Stach 1929), eventhough such Hungarian language in the scientific literature, critical reviews have a special importance in the eventhough this work doesn’t contain relevant case of this country because of the large changes faunistical records of the taxon.
    [Show full text]
  • Collembola) Species Inhabiting Heathlands in Poland
    © Entomologica Fennica. 28 November 2019 Five springtail (Collembola) species inhabiting heathlands in Poland Micha³ Furgo³, Agata Piwnik & Konrad Winiewski Furgo³, M., Piwnik, A. & Winiewski, K. 2019: Five springtail (Collembola) species inhabiting heathlands in Poland. Entomol. Fennica 30: 186195. doi: https://doi.org/10.33338/ef.87176 We report the presence of five Collembola species from western Poland, three of which were recorded in this country for the first time Bourletiella pistillum Gisin, 1964 (Bourletiellidae), Lepidocyrtus tellecheae Arbea & Jordana 1990 (Entomobryidae) and Isotoma caerulea Bourlet, 1839 (Isotomidae). Seira doll- fusi Carl, 1899 (Entomobryidae) was earlier known solely from a single, old re- port. Pachyotoma topsenti (Denis, 1948) (Isotomidae) is generally considered a rare species in the region. Though generally infrequently encountered, all five species occur in very high numbers in our plots and they are among the dominant springtails. The habitats surveyed in the study, i.e. dry Calluna-heathlands and their accompanying habitats are endangered in Central Europe and require active management. In one of the studied plots, a prescribed burn was applied to rejuve- nate the heather. We discuss the distribution and habitat preferences of the five species in the European context and their possible significance as indicators of different habitat types. M. Furgo³ (ORCID: 0000-0001-8723-6363) & A. Piwnik (ORCID: 0000-0002- 2407-5037), Department of Invertebrate Biology, Evolution and Conservation, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Wroc³aw, Przybyszewskiego 65, 51-148 Wroc³aw, Poland; E-mails: [email protected] & [email protected] K. Winiewski (ORCID: 0000-0002-6780-3292), Department of Zoology, Insti- tute of Biology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Mathematics and Nat- ural Sciences, Pomeranian University in S³upsk, Arciszewskiego 22b, 76-200 S³upsk, Poland; E-mail: [email protected] Received 1 February 2019, accepted 18 June 2019 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Indian Collembola (Insecta: Apterygota)
    ISSN 0973-1555(Print) ISSN 2348-7372(Online) HALTERES, Volume 9, 116-130, 2018 © GURU PADA MANDAL doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1280640 Collembola of India- An Updated Checklist Guru Pada Mandal Zoological Survey of India, M Block, New Alipore, Kolkata-700053. (Email: [email protected]) Abstract An updated checklist of Collembola from India is provided with their distribution. A total of 342 species under 113 genera grouped in 20 families are listed. 307 species belong to 97 genera of order Poduromorpha + Entomobryomorpha and 35 species belongs to 16 genera of order Symphypleona. Additionally, a new distributional data have been provided for Seventy eight species recorded from different states of India. Keywords: Collembola, species, checklist, India. Received: 9 May 2017; Revised: 3 June 2018; Online: 5 June 2018. Introduction The Collembola, commonly called are some of the researchers who have “spring-tails”, are small, entognathous, wingless substantially added a number of species to the hexapods possessing a spring-like forked Collembola from India. Indian fauna of jumping organ, the furcula, underneath the Collembola is represented by 342 species of 113 fourth abdominal segment. There are about 8800 genera belonging to 20 families. Out of which, described species of Collembola worldwide Poduromorpha + Entomobryomorpha consists (Bellinger et al., 2018). of 307 species in 97 genera in 12 families: The first Indian species of collembola Neanuridae (55 species of 24 genera), from Malabar hill regions was published by Tullbergidae (6 species
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the RESTRUCTURING of ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS in RESPONSE to PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell a Dissertation Submitt
    THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell 1 A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Winter 2019 © Adam B. Mitchell All Rights Reserved THE RESTRUCTURING OF ARTHROPOD TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS IN RESPONSE TO PLANT INVASION by Adam B. Mitchell Approved: ______________________________________________________ Jacob L. Bowman, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology Approved: ______________________________________________________ Mark W. Rieger, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Approved: ______________________________________________________ Douglas J. Doren, Ph.D. Interim Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Douglas W. Tallamy, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Charles R. Bartlett, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: ______________________________________________________ Jeffery J. Buler, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]