AFN Renewal Commission Report of Recommendations 2005
A Treaty Among Ourselves
Returning to the Spirit of Our Peoples
AFN Renewal Commission
Report 2005 Assembly of First Nations Renewal Commission 473 Albert Street, 8th floor, Ottawa, ON K1R 5B4 (613) 241-6789 • toll-free: 1-866-869-6789 www.afn.ca Table of Contents table of . . . contents...... Letter of Transmittal 1
Preamble ...... 2
Introduction ...... 5 Background ...... 5 Mandate and Methodology ...... 5 Report Structure ...... 6
Chapter 1 - Our Shared Vision of Renewal AFN Renewal Vision ...... 7 AFN Renewal Framework...... 8 Why is AFN Renewal Required?...... 9 Implementing the Recommendations to Achieve the Vision ...... 13 Renewal is an Honourable Goal ...... 14
Chapter 2 - An AFN Rooted in Culture: Respect For First Nation Values Introduction ...... 15 Issue: First Nation Values ...... 17 Issue: Traditional Leadership and Decision-Making Practices ...... 18 Issue: First Nation Traditional and Cultural Practices and Languages ...... 19
Chapter 3 - Making the AFN Representative Introduction ...... 21 Issue: Defining AFN Membership ...... 22 Issue: Exercising the Rights of Membership ...... 23 Issue: Representation of Individual First Nation Citizens and Urban First Nation Organizations ...... 25 Issue: National Election ...... 27 Issue: Relationships with Other First Nation Organizations ...... 30 Issue: Effective Representation in National Forums ...... 32 Issue: Effective Representation in International Forums...... 33 Issue: Support for Nation-Building ...... 36
Chapter 4 - A Responsive AFN: Renewing AFN Governing & Corporate Structures Introduction...... 39 Issue: Treaties ...... 41 Issue: AFN Assembly Structures...... 43 First Nations-in-Assembly...... 43 The Confederacy of Nations ...... 43 Issue: Executive Structures ...... 45 The AFN Executive Committee ...... 45 The National Chief ...... 48 AFN Regional Chiefs ...... 50 Issue: Advisory Structures (Councils: Elders, Women, Youth) ...... 52 Elders ...... 53 Women ...... 53 Youth ...... 55 Modifications to AFN Advisory Councils...... 56 Issue: Corporate (Administrative) Structures ...... 57 Issue: Accountability...... 60 Issue: Funding Arrangements ...... 61 Issue: Regulatory Structures...... 63 Office of the Auditor General...... 63 AFN Chief Electoral Officer ...... 64
i A Treaty Among Ourselves: Returning to the Spirit of Our Peoples AFN Renewal Commission Report of Recommendations 2005 Printed in Canada. ISBN 1-894804-26-0
Aussi disponible en français sous le titre « Un traité entre nous : Retour à l’esprit de nos peuples. Commission du renouvellement de l’APN Rapport 2005 des recommandations » (ISBN 1-894804-27-9). Chapter 5 - A Respected and Effective AFN: Renewing AFN Procedures Introduction ...... 65 Creating a Climate of Respect ...... 66 AFN Assemblies and Assembly Procedures ...... 67 Issue: Strategic Planning for a National First Nations Agenda...... 68 Issue: Setting the Assembly Agenda...... 68 Issue: Quorum...... 70 Issue: Participation in AFN Assemblies ...... 71 Issue: Resolutions, Decision-Making and Voting ...... 73 Issue: The Assembly Speaker ...... 77 Issue: Use of French and English at Assemblies...... 78 Conflict Resolution Process ...... 79 The AFN Policy Process...... 81 Issue: Chiefs’ Committees ...... 82 Issue: National Policy Forums...... 83
Chapter 6 - Rooted and Responsive AFN Communications Introduction...... 85 Issue: AFN Communication Strategies ...... 88 Issue: Information Technology ...... 88 Issue: Public Education ...... 89 Issue: Research and Policy Support...... 90 Issue: Communicating in French and English ...... 90 Chapter 7 - Rooted-Representative-Responsive-Respected: Implementing AFN Renewal Introduction ...... 91 Implementation Oversight ...... 92 Conclusion: A Treaty Among Ourselves ...... 93 Implementation Plan ...... 96
Appendices ...... 123 Appendix A — AFN Renewal Commission Terms of Reference ...... 127 Appendix B — Commissioners’ Biographies ...... 128 Appendix C — Commission Hearings ...... 130 Appendix D — Glossary ...... 134 Appendix E — Revised AFN Charter ...... 137 Appendix F — Code of Conduct ...... 154 Appendix G — Oath(s) of Office ...... 155 Appendix H — Conflict of Interest Declaration ...... 157 Appendix I — AFN Standing Rules of Procedure for Assemblies ...... 159 Appendix J — Speakers’ Guide...... 171 Appendix K — Electoral Rules...... 172 Appendix L — Consolidated Recommendations ...... 175
Acknowledgments ...... 179
ii The Vision is one in which the AFN exists to support
First Nations as they strive to achieve self-reliance and self-determination. letterLetter ofof Transmittal transmittal — RANSMITTAL
National Chief Phil Fontaine and Members of the Assembly of First Nations: T
WE ARE HONOURED to submit to you this report on the renewal of the Assembly of First Nations entitled: A Treaty Among Ourselves. ETTER OF L When the AFN Renewal Commission was launched in January 2004, the Co-Chairs were given authority to select Commissioners based on criteria such as political or public experience, legal or academic background, broad understanding of First Nations issues and the ability to advance a national perspective. Selection also took into consideration issues of gender, youth, Elder and regional balance.
Nine Commissioners were appointed: · Mary Louise Bernard (Nova Scotia) · Michele Rouleau (Quebec) · Sylvia Maracle (Ontario) · Marion Ironquill Meadmore (Manitoba) · Henry Delorme (Saskatchewan) · Gregg Smith (Alberta) · François Paulette (Northwest Territories) · Ginger Gosnell (Youth Representative) · Neil Sterritt (British Columbia)
All the Commissioners, with the exception of youth representative Ginger Gosnell, were able to serve for the duration of our mandate.
In accordance with our terms of reference, we have undertaken broad-based discussions with First Nations and First Nations citizens across Canada, including urban First Nations peoples, about the renewal and restructuring of the Assembly of First Nations. We are grateful for the many thoughtful presentations, considered comments and written submissions we received. Without these important contributions this Report could not have been written: we wish to acknowledge the essential contributions of all the presenters to the Commission. We have been impressed with the degree of concern, commitment and regard that all participants in this renewal process expressed toward the Assembly of First Nations and its future.
What we as a Commission heard and what we learned and concluded about AFN renewal, is set out in this Report. A small portion of what we heard is reflected in quotations included throughout. While it is impossible to capture all comments made, we are confident that those who participated will recognize their important con- tributions to the renewal initiative in our analysis and recommendations for a restored and revived Assembly of First Nations.
We are inspired by what we’ve heard. And our main inspiration is that we as First Nations peoples have clung to a vision of a future that is ours to create and mold for future generations. At the same time we are attentive to our past and respectful of those who have gone before us.
A Treaty Among Ourselves Returning to the Spirit of Our Peoples 1 — The challenge for the AFN is no less important today than it was in the early 1980s, when the Chiefs in Assembly defined the AFN as a national organization of First Nations. We still need to be vigilant in upholding our rights, ensuring the integrity of our land and fostering the well-being of our peoples and communities. But, over the past twenty years, significant changes have occurred. RANSMITTAL T The constitutional and legal environment in which we assert and exercise our rights has changed. As a result, many First Nations are now engaged in processes of nation-building and decolonization. A renewed AFN must respond to these changes and position itself to support and assist all First Nations in Canada, no matter ETTER OF
L where they are in the nation-building and decolonization processes. AFN Renewal is needed to carry out the First Nations-Federal Crown Political Accord on the Recognition and Implementation of First Nation Governments signed in May 2005 with the Government of Canada. The Accord holds much potential to usher in a new era in our relationship with Canada, to restore our Treaty relationships and to revive our Nations.
The social and economic conditions of First Nations also have changed in the past two decades, though there remain disparities between quality of life indicators for First Nation and non-First Nations peoples and communities in Canada.
AFN Renewal should support First Nations achieve the purposes and objectives that are set out in the AFN’s recent report Our Nations, Our Governments: Choosing Our Own Paths. In particular, we believe the AFN has a role to play in advancing the interrelated objectives of improving the social and economic well-being of our people and ensuring implementation and recognition of our rights. In fulfilling this role, the Assembly of First Nations can and will remain relevant to all First Nations and First Nation citizens. The AFN, simply put, will continue to be an essential part of our collective vision for the future.
To meet the challenges of renewal at this time we as Co-Chairs, together with our fellow Commissioners, believe the AFN must adjust and grow. As a result of this Commission’s work, we note with approval that change and renewal, in some areas, has begun already within the AFN in anticipation of the tabling of this report. This is a positive development: the AFN must believe in and engage in the ongoing evolutionary process of renewal to strengthen its effectiveness on the national and international stages, as the principal national organization representing First Nations and their citizens.
We believe through the agenda of renewal that the Commission sets out in this Report, an AFN rooted in First Nation values and culture will emerge. Our recommendations propose that the AFN become more broadly representative of First Nations and their citizens, including urban First Nations peoples. As a more representative and responsive organization, the AFN will carry the respect and honour of First Nations, including in the forums of Confederation such as First Ministers Meetings and in international forums such as the United Nations. All of these things are part of the vision that First Nations and citizens have for the Assembly of First Nations. It is a vision that is shared by the AFN Renewal Commission and which we believe can be made real through implementation of this Report’s recommendations.
Wendy John, Co-Chair
R.K. (Joe) Miskokomon, Co-Chair
Ottawa – September 21, 2005
2 AFN Renewal Commission Report 2005 Preamble — preamblehe origins of the Assembly of First Nations can be found in the early efforts of First Nations people to organize
politically at the end of the First World War. First Nation veterans returned to Canada with heightened political REAMBLE P Tawareness, but found the human rights and dignities they had fought for in Europe were overlooked at home and made a mockery of in the treatment of Indian peoples on reserves. Between 1919 and the early 1930s, the League of Indian Nations of Canada actively opposed the assimilationist policies of the day – including involun- tary enfranchisement of veterans, oppressive economic policies, limitations on the right to travel outside reserves and the taking of Indian lands through questionable land surrenders.
Although the League of Indian Nations was unable to bring a national organization into being, its activities planted the seeds of 20th century Indian political activism and organization. It laid the early foundations of what would emerge, much later, as the National Indian Brotherhood and its successor organization, the Assembly of First Nations.
One of the most important contemporary Indian political developments was the introduction in 1969 of the White Paper – Canada’s Statement on Indian Policy – by the then Minister of Indian Affairs Jean Chrétien. Newly formed provincial and territorial Indian organizations, representing primarily status Indians, joined forces with status Indian leaders of the National Indian Council (which also represented non-status and Métis peoples) and members of the federally organized National Indian Advisory Council in opposition to the White Paper. They coordinated their efforts through an executive, known as “the National Indian Brotherhood”, comprising the presidents of provincial and territorial organizations.
First Nations were galvanized in their united opposition to the White Paper and its overall intent to do away with Indian rights and “the special status of the Indians”. Acting in solidarity through the National Indian Brotherhood, First Nations successfully forced federal withdrawal of the White Paper. Under Harold Cardinal’s leadership in 1970 the Indian Association of Alberta presented to the federal government Citizens Plus, more commonly known as the Red Paper. The Red Paper set out an alternative view, describing how Indian peoples wished to contribute to Canadian society while concurrently exercising rights and power at the community level.
A Treaty Among Ourselves Returning to the Spirit of Our Peoples 3 — REAMBLE P Also in 1970, George Manuel, the first elected president of the National Indian Brotherhood, took up residence in Ottawa, giving the national organization what has now become a permanent presence in the Nation’s capital. The National Indian Brotherhood made gains in education and economic development and branched out into the international arena, contributing to the formation of the World Council of Indigenous Peoples. At this time First Nations were becoming more acutely aware of their legal rights, as a result of resource mega-projects such as the Mackenzie Valley pipeline and the James Bay hydro project. Court decisions also led to important policy developments, such as the introduction of the first land claims policy.
Toward the end of the 1970s, the rights of First Nations peoples and Canada’s constitutional development became mixed. The National Indian Brotherhood faced the challenge of addressing the threat to First Nation rights posed by the federal government’s decision to patriate and amend Canada’s constitution. Once again, an issue, national in scope and with vast implications for the rights of First Nations in Canada, united First Nations in common cause. Chiefs from across Canada travelled to Britain to raise concerns, both in the British courts and in Parliament, about the potentially fatal effects on the special relationship with the Crown that would result from a constitutional patriation process executed without attention to Aboriginal and Treaty rights.
First Nations leaders became active participants in the many constitutional discussions that took place in the months leading up to patriation of Canada’s constitution in 1982. The overriding objective, to protect First Nation constitutional rights and the special relationship with the Crown, was realized with the inclusion of Sections 25, 35 and 37 in the Constitution Act, 1982.
It was within the politically charged atmosphere that surrounded constitutional patriation that the Chiefs began to work together. In December 1980 an Assembly of Chiefs adopted the Declaration of First Nations, establishing the foundation upon which the national organization now known as the Assembly of First Nations stands.
Through the constitutional processes of the 1980s, through the 1990s and the recent period of modern Treaty-making and Supreme Court decisions such as Guerin, Simon, Sparrow, Delgamuukw, to the present day, the Assembly of First Nations has demonstrated its commitment to work and walk with First Nations to uphold and assert Aboriginal rights, Treaty rights, and rights of self-determi- nation and self-government. Most recently, the AFN provided leadership in lay- ing out the foundation for the next stage in the restoration of our Treaty and constitutional rights and relationships, with the signing in May 2005 of the his- toric First Nations – Federal Crown Political Accord on the Recognition and Implementation of First Nation Governments.
4 AFN Renewal Commission Report 2005 introductionIntroduction — Background NTRODUCTION I
SINCE THE ASSEMBLY OF FIRST NATIONS was established in the early 1980s, many options for change to its organization and procedures have been advanced. Despite this, a substantial and deep reform of the AFN has never been accomplished. Twenty years after its ratification at the 1985 Annual General Assembly in Vancouver, the AFN Charter remains largely unchanged, as do its rules of procedure and its administrative structure, the National Indian Brotherhood.
At the Assembly of First Nations’ Confederacy meeting in Vancouver in the spring of 2003, many specific struc- tural and procedural changes to the Assembly of First Nations were proposed. The intention was to clarify responsibilities and objectives for the AFN, as the national organization representing First Nations. Following discussion, the Confederacy called for a broader review of the organization’s structure, to be undertaken with the active engagement of the First Nations and First Nation citizens.
In response, National Chief Phil Fontaine proposed the creation of the AFN Renewal Commission on December 9, 2003. It was formally established in January 2004 as an independent, objective commission operat- ing at arms-length from the Assembly of First Nations.
Mandate and Methodology THE AFN RENEWAL COMMISSION’S mandate has been to conduct a review of the Assembly of First Nations. Terms of Reference for the Commission, included as Appendix A, were intentionally broad. An essential part of the mandate was to report and make recommendations on the renewal of the national organization and to pro- vide a plan for implementation of the Commission’s recommendations. To do so, the Commission was asked to engage in discussion and dialogue with First Nations people and to take into consideration the current social, economic and cultural circumstances of First Nations.
In March 2004, the Commission launched a national process to engage First Nations leaders and citizens in a discussion of what the AFN should look like and what its role and functions should be. Sessions were held in every region of Canada and a large number of First Nations and their citizens participated. Many also chose to share their views with the AFN Renewal Commission through written submissions. Focus groups were convened to explore key issues in greater depth and to draw out different perspectives of the organization.
Research was completed on a variety of issues pertinent to the Commission’s mandate, including a history of Aboriginal efforts to organize nationally in Canada, optional AFN governance models and different approaches to the elec- tion of the leadership of the national organization.
A Treaty Among Ourselves Returning to the Spirit of Our Peoples 5 — And finally, the Commission reviewed with a critical eye relevant documentation such as the AFN Charter, past reports on AFN re-organization and AFN resolutions that called for structural reforms to the AFN.
Contributions to the work of the Commission were made by Treaty groups, traditional leaders, provincial and territorial organizations, tribal councils, program and service delivery organizations such as Native Friendship NTRODUCTION I Centres, First Nations negotiating and implementing self-government, groups representing Elders, women and youth and the leaders and staff of the AFN. Our consultations gave the Commission the opportunity to hear the peoples’ views directly, and to understand why and how they believe the AFN should be renewed. Most importantly, it gave us a unique insight into what First Nation citizens want a renewed AFN to look like and how they want it to function in the future.
Report Structure
Chapter 1 is about a vision and what it means to renew the AFN as a national organization of First Nations and First Nation citizens. Being a national organization is no mean feat in a country as big as Canada. But this vision – the vision expressed to the Commission – is crucial to understanding the rest of the report.
Chapter 2 underlines the importance of an AFN that is rooted in First Nation values, principles and traditional knowledge. The Commission believes values and respect for these values, provide both a starting point for renewal and the foundation upon which a renewed AFN can stand.
Chapter 3 delivers some of the Commission’s most significant recommendations concerning the representativeness of the AFN today. These address issues of membership of the AFN and the Commission’s call for the AFN to represent the interests of a broad constituency of First Nations peoples.
Chapters 4 and 5 turns attention to the many complex and interrelated issues associated with reform of the AFN governance structure and amendments to founding documents of the AFN, such as the AFN Charter. Chapter 4 addresses structures such as the Confederacy of Nations, the executive structure and the AFN Secretariat. Chapter 5 encompasses recommendations for AFN procedures including the conduct of Assembly meetings. Both of these chapters contain recommendations aimed at making the AFN more responsive to First Nations and as a result, more effective and respected.
Throughout its work, the Commission heard repeatedly of the importance of AFN communications. Chapter 6 addresses Commission recommendations for improvements in this regard. The Commission agrees that without regular, predictable and consistent communications, throughout the organization, the AFN will be unable to ful- fill its roles and responsibilities.
The Commission’s mandate calls for an implementation plan to form part of the final Report. Chapter 7, the last chapter, speaks to implementation of the recommendations. It addresses the activities that are needed to make renewal work and to engage First Nations to want to make it work.
The appendices are an important part of the Report in that they contain details concerning all aspects of the proposed AFN Renewal.
6 AFN Renewal Commission Report 2005 Chapter 1 Our Shared Vision of Renewal enewal signifies and embraces change. It’s about revival. It’s a restoration. It conveys hope and optimism for the future. As seasons change, the land bears witness to the renewal process. A landscape experiencing renewal
shifts and brings forth new features, new forms and, often, new life. As Grand Chief Chris McCormick of the ENEWAL
R R Association of Iroquois and Allied Indians stated:
“Our ancestors understood the concept of renewal and how vital ISION OF
it is to constantly renew our own understanding of relationships and V duties within the world.” Grand Chief Chris McCormick, HARED Association of Iroquois and Allied Nations, Toronto Hearing S UR The Assembly of First Nations Renewal Commission (AFNRC) embraces the idea of change expressed by Grand Chief McCormick and others that appeared before the Commission. We believe it is time to renew our relation- ships within the AFN and reaffirm the Assembly’s role and responsibility as the national representative of First O 1— Nations in Canada. Ultimately, our vision is one of self-reliant and self-determining First Nations and citizens,
having regained our rightful place in Canada and as indigenous peoples in the world. HAP TER C
AFN Renewal Vision THE RENEWAL COMMISSION has gained perspective on how First Nations and citizens view their national organi- zation. From the many voices we heard, we have discerned common messages and themes. What we heard is that First Nations and their citizens envision an AFN that is relevant to them because it is: Rooted in First Nation values, principles, customs and traditions; Representative of the First Nations and their citizens; Responsive to the diverse circumstances, needs and priorities of the First Nations and their citizens; and Respected and Effective in Canadian Confederation and internationally.
First Nations envision an empowered, engaged and valued AFN participating as the equal of federal, provincial and territorial governments. They see their national organization effectively representing their interests in nation- al forums such as First Ministers’ meetings. Likewise, they envision an AFN that supports First Nations within their own nation-to-nation and government-to-government relationships and in processes of nation-building and decolonization.
Together as one body of people, regardless of our unique histories and traditions, the First Nations told the Commission they share a vision of a revived and restored Assembly of First Nations, a vision in which:
The Assembly of First Nations exists to support First Nations as they strive to re-establish self-determination and self-reliance, and to help First Nations peoples regain their rightful place in national and international forums.
A Treaty Among Ourselves Returning to the Spirit of Our Peoples 7 This entire report is about putting into words the vision of the Assembly of
ENEWAL First Nations that has been expressed by First Nation leaders and citizens to R the Renewal Commission. It also is about identifying how this vision can be translated into reality through implementation of the recommendations being tabled. ISION OF V The Commission’s recommendations touch on many aspects of the national organization. In some cases the reforms proposed may seem radical or HARED S revolutionary; in other cases, they may be interpreted as part of the natural
UR course of growth and evolution. In all cases, however, the recommendations for AFN Renewal are tied to the four main themes of a Rooted, Representative, Responsive and Respected Assembly of First Nations. 1— O 1—
At the broadest level, the recommendations for change address: the place of First Nation values, principles, traditional HAP TER C knowledge and practices within the AFN; membership in the AFN and representation of all First Nations and First Nation citizens in Canada; relationship-building with other First Nation organizations by way of written protocols or agreements; reform of AFN structures and procedures; amendments to the AFN Charter and Rules of Procedure; communications plans and strategies that work; support for First Nations regardless of their place in the nation-building process; equal participation in Confederation; and, the AFN’s international role.
AFN Renewal Framework THIS DIAGRAM REPRESENTS a framework for the vision of AFN Renewal. It encompasses the four main themes that emerged from the Renewal Commission’s work. It also maps out the journey that the First Nations must embark upon collectively in order to lift up the morale of the AFN and elevate it to a place where First Nations want it to be. All the points on the circle are related, but they are also distinct aspects of the cycle leading to renewal of the AFN as a relevant organization.
The Commission is of the view that the Assembly of First Nations can become an organization that is supported by the sustaining roots of First Nations’ values, customs and tradi- tions. All First Nations and citizens, including First Nation women, youth and urban people, can find a home within a renewed AFN. The AFN can become representative and responsive if renewal addresses specific flaws and weaknesses found within the AFN Charter itself, in AFN governing bodies and procedures and in the AFN’s approach to communications.
8 AFN Renewal Commission Report 2005 To become respected and effective in national and international forums, the AFN must function with the respect and confidence of the First Nations and their citizens. Respect is an attitude and a behaviour. It is within the ability of individuals and the national organization to match respect with respect: to create a climate of respect and to contribute to an organizational culture of respect that is based on First Nation values, principles and tra- ditional practices.
The power to effect the type of change we envision remains, in some cases, with the Chiefs in Assembly. In other cases it rests exclusively in the hands of individuals - with individual First Nation Chiefs and leaders, with AFN leaders and with those who engage in the business of the AFN.
Through change, the AFN can become more relevant. It will be a beacon that encourages First Nations to embrace their cultural roots. It will help them, at least in part, to regain the strength and knowledge needed to overcome the legacy of colonialism and assimilation. It will be an organization that plays a forward-looking and
facilitating role in nation-building and decolonization. ENEWAL R ISION OF Why is AFN Renewal Required? V BY PARTICIPATING IN the Renewal Commission’s hearings and forums, presenters HARED had an opportunity to formally share and express their perspectives of the AFN S
and its future. The Commission has taken into consideration the sentiments UR expressed by the First Nations and their citizens, including those that convey positive as well as more pessimistic outlooks. 1— O 1—
“With all due respect, the AFN is largely irrelevant to
ordinary people trying to live their lives in Aboriginal HAP TER communities. It is seen to be an organization of Chiefs C and for Chiefs.” Andrea Moore, Montreal Hearing
Some presenters expressed the opinion that, in its basic organization, structure and procedures, the AFN continues to reflect the legacies and institu- “The AFN clearly has a role tions of colonialism. to play in advocating for First “The Assembly, the First Nations-in-Assembly is really a manifestation of the Indian Act structure. The Nations in Canada, and by Confederacy of Nations is still a representation of the colonial structure of Canada… [with] boundary lines recognizing its strengths and created after the Treaties… We had thought that we would get away from that, back when we formed the Assembly of limitations it may continue to First Nations, and move and illustrate our nationality and our treaty federalism.” ensure that all First Nations’ Professor Sákéj Henderson, Native Law Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon Hearing interests are protected.”