Redalyc.Population Dynamics of the Yellow Piranha Serrasalmus
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Serrasalmus Geryi Ecological Risk Screening Summary
Serrasalmus geryi (a piranha, no common name) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, April 2012 Revised, July 2018 Web Version, 8/22/2019 Photo: greyloch. Licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 2.0. Available: https://www.flickr.com/photos/greyloch/26981441525. (July 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2018): “South America: Tocantins River Basin in Brazil.” 1 Status in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the wild in the United States. This species is in trade in the United States. For example: From AquaScapeOnline (2018): “Violet Line Piranha 4"-6" (Serrasalmus Geryi [sic]) […] Special $300.00 Reg. Price $400.00” Possession or importation of fish of the genus Serrasalmus, or fish known as “piranha” in general, is banned or regulated in many States. Every effort has been made to list all applicable State laws and regulations pertaining to this species, but this list may not be comprehensive. From Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (2019): “No person, firm, corporation, partnership, or association shall possess, sell, offer for sale, import, bring, release or cause to be brought or imported into the State of Alabama any of the following live fish or animals: […] Any Piranha or any fish of the genera Serrasalmus, Pristobrycon, Pygocentrus, Catorprion, or Pygopristus; […]” From Alaska State Legislature (2019): “Except as provided in (b) - (d) of this section, no person may import any live fish into the state for purposes of stocking or rearing in the waters of the state. -
Freshwater Ornamental Fish Commonly Cultured in Florida 1 Jeffrey E
Circular 54 Freshwater Ornamental Fish Commonly Cultured in Florida 1 Jeffrey E. Hill and Roy P.E. Yanong2 Introduction Unlike many traditional agriculture industries in Florida which may raise one or only a few different species, tropical Freshwater tropical ornamental fish culture is the largest fish farmers collectively culture hundreds of different component of aquaculture in the State of Florida and ac- species and varieties of fishes from numerous families and counts for approximately 95% of all ornamentals produced several geographic regions. There is much variation within in the US. There are about 200 Florida producers who and among fish groups with regard to acceptable water collectively raise over 800 varieties of freshwater fishes. In quality parameters, feeding and nutrition, and mode of 2003 alone, farm-gate value of Florida-raised tropical fish reproduction. Some farms specialize in one or a few fish was about US$47.2 million. Given the additional economic groups, while other farms produce a wide spectrum of effects of tropical fish trade such as support industries, aquatic livestock. wholesalers, retail pet stores, and aquarium product manufacturing, the importance to Florida is tremendous. Fish can be grouped in a number of different ways. One major division in the industry which has practical signifi- Florida’s tropical ornamental aquaculture industry is cance is that between egg-laying species and live-bearing concentrated in Hillsborough, Polk, and Miami-Dade species. The culture practices for each division are different, counties with additional farms throughout the southern requiring specialized knowledge and equipment to succeed. half of the state. Historic factors, warm climate, the proxim- ity to airports and other infrastructural considerations This publication briefly reviews the more common groups (ready access to aquaculture equipment, supplies, feed, etc.) of freshwater tropical ornamental fishes cultured in Florida are the major reasons for this distribution. -
Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved: I
AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Nilton Eduardo Deza Arroyo for the degree of Master of Science in Fisheries Science presented on November 8. 1996. Title: Mercury Accumulation in Fish from Madre de Dios. a Goidmining Area in the Amazon Basin. Peru Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: I. Weber Redacted for Privacy Wayne K. Seim In this study mercury contamination from goldmining was measured in tissues of fish from Madre de Dios, Amazonia, Peru.Bioaccumulation, biomagnification, the difference in mercury burden among residential and migratory species, and comparison between fish from Puerto Maldonado (a goidmining area) and Manu (a pristine area) were examined. Samples of dorsal-epaxial muscle of dorado (Brachyplatystoma flavicans); fasaco (Hoplias malabaricus),bothcarnivores;boquichico(Prochilodusnigricans),a detritivore;mojarita (Bryconopsaffmelanurus),an insectivore;and carachama (Hypostomus sp.), an detntivore; were analyzed by using the flameless cold vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry technique. Dorado, a top predator, displayed the highest values of total mercury (699 ugfKg ± 296).Six out of ten dorados showed an average higher than safe values of 0.5 ug/g (WHO, 1991). Lower values reported in this study in the other species suggest that dorado may have gained its mercury burden downstream of Madre de Dios River, in the Madeira River, where goidmining activities are several times greater than that in the Madre de Dios area. Fasaco from Puerto Maldonado displayed higher levels than fasaco from Manu; however, mercury contamination in Puerto Maldonado is lower than values reported for fish from areas with higher quantities of mercury released into the environment. Positive correlation between mercury content and weight of fish for dorado, fasaco and boquichico served to explain bioaccumulation processes in the area of study. -
The Vulnerability of Amazon Freshwater Ecosystems Leandro Castello1 , David G
MINI REVIEW The vulnerability of Amazon freshwater ecosystems Leandro Castello1 , David G. McGrath1,2, Laura L. Hess3, Michael T. Coe1,PaulA.Lefebvre1,PauloPetry4, Marcia N. Macedo1,VivianF.Reno´ 5,&CarolineC.Arantes2 1 The Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, Massachusetts, USA 2 Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazonia,ˆ Santarem,´ Para,´ Brazil 3 Earth Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA 4 The Nature Conservancy, Latin American Conservation Region, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 5 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, Sao˜ Jose´ dos Campos, Sao˜ Paulo, Brazil Keywords Abstract Conservation; ecosystem goods and services; floodplain; hydrologic connectivity; policy; The hydrological connectivity of freshwater ecosystems in the Amazon basin protected areas; wetlands. makes them highly sensitive to a broad range of anthropogenic activities occur- ring in aquatic and terrestrial systems at local and distant locations. Amazon Correspondence freshwater ecosystems are suffering escalating impacts caused by expansions Leandro Castello, The Woods Hole Research in deforestation, pollution, construction of dams and waterways, and over- Center, 149 Woods Hole Rd, Falmouth, MA harvesting of animal and plant species. The natural functions of these ecosys- 02540, USA. Tel: 1.508.1564; fax: +1.508.444.1864 tems are changing, and their capacity to provide historically important goods + E-mail: [email protected] and services is declining. Existing management policies—including national water resources legislation, community-based natural resource management Received schemes, and the protected area network that now epitomizes the Amazon 25 June 2012 conservation paradigm—cannot adequately curb most impacts. Such manage- Accepted ment strategies are intended to conserve terrestrial ecosystems, have design 18 December 2012 and implementation deficiencies, or fail to account for the hydrologic connec- Editor tivity of freshwater ecosystems. -
Serrasalmus Elongatus (Slender Piranha) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
Slender Piranha (Serrasalmus elongatus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, April 2012 Revised, July 2018 and August 2019 Web Version, 8/21/2019 Photo: Clinton & Charles Robertson. Licensed under Creative Commons BY 2.0. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=16042555. (July 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States 1 Native Range From Eschmeyer et al. (2018): “Amazon and Orinoco River basins: Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela.” Status in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the wild in the United States. This species is in trade in the United States, for example: From AquaScapeOnline (2018): “Elongatus Piranha 5"-6" (Serrasalmus Elongatus [sic]) […] Our Price: $125.00” “Elongatus black mask 6"-7" (Serrasalmus Elongatus [sic]) […] Our Price: $150.00” Possession or importation of fish of the genus Serrasalmus, or fish known as “piranha” in general, is banned or regulated in many States. Every effort has been made to list all applicable State laws and regulations pertaining to this species, but this list may not be comprehensive. From Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (2019): “No person, firm, corporation, partnership, or association shall possess, sell, offer for sale, import, bring, release or cause to be brought or imported into the State of Alabama any of the following live fish or animals: […] Any Piranha or any fish of the genera Serrasalmus, Pristobrycon, Pygocentrus, Catorprion, or Pygopristus; […]” From Alaska State Legislature (2019): “Except as provided in (b) - (d) of this section, no person may import any live fish into the state for purposes of stocking or rearing in the waters of the state. -
Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................ -
Species Composition and Invasion Risks of Alien Ornamental Freshwater
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Species composition and invasion risks of alien ornamental freshwater fshes from pet stores in Klang Valley, Malaysia Abdulwakil Olawale Saba1,2, Ahmad Ismail1, Syaizwan Zahmir Zulkifi1, Muhammad Rasul Abdullah Halim3, Noor Azrizal Abdul Wahid4 & Mohammad Noor Azmai Amal1* The ornamental fsh trade has been considered as one of the most important routes of invasive alien fsh introduction into native freshwater ecosystems. Therefore, the species composition and invasion risks of fsh species from 60 freshwater fsh pet stores in Klang Valley, Malaysia were studied. A checklist of taxa belonging to 18 orders, 53 families, and 251 species of alien fshes was documented. Fish Invasiveness Screening Test (FIST) showed that seven (30.43%), eight (34.78%) and eight (34.78%) species were considered to be high, medium and low invasion risks, respectively. After the calibration of the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) v2 using the Receiver Operating Characteristics, a threshold value of 17 for distinguishing between invasive and non-invasive fshes was identifed. As a result, nine species (39.13%) were of high invasion risk. In this study, we found that non-native fshes dominated (85.66%) the freshwater ornamental trade in Klang Valley, while FISK is a more robust tool in assessing the risk of invasion, and for the most part, its outcome was commensurate with FIST. This study, for the frst time, revealed the number of high-risk ornamental fsh species that give an awareness of possible future invasion if unmonitored in Klang Valley, Malaysia. As a global hobby, fshkeeping is cherished by both young and old people. -
Caudal Fin-Nipping by Serrasalmus Maculatus (Characiformes: Serrasalmidae) in a Small Water Reservoir: Seasonal Variation and Prey Selection
ZOOLOGIA 32 (6): 457–462, December 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702015000600004 Caudal fin-nipping by Serrasalmus maculatus (Characiformes: Serrasalmidae) in a small water reservoir: seasonal variation and prey selection André T. da Silva1,*, Juliana Zina2, Fabio C. Ferreira3, Leandro M. Gomiero1 & Roberto Goitein1 1Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista. Avenida 24A, 1515, Bela Vista, 13506-900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil. 2Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia. Rua José Moreira Sobrinho, 45206-000 Jequié, BA, Brazil. 3Departamento de Ciências do Mar, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Rua Silva Jardim, 136, Edifício Central, 11015-020 Santos, SP, Brazil. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. We evaluated how seasonality affects the frequency and intensity of fin-nipping, as well as the fish prey preferences of Serrasalmus maculatus Kner, 1858. The study took place in a small reservoir of the Ribeirão Claro River basin, state of São Paulo, southeastern Brazil. Fish were sampled monthly from July 2003 to June 2004, using gillnets. Sampling consisted of leaving 50 m of gillnets in the water for approximately 24 hours each month. No seasonal variation in the frequency and intensity of fin-nipping was observed. Among six prey species, piranhas displayed less damage in their fins, possibly due to intraspecific recognition. Under natural conditions, the caudal fins of Cyphocharax modestus (Fernández- Yépez, 1948) were the most intensively mutilated, which suggests multiple attacks on the same individual. The size of individuals in this species was positively correlated with the mutilated area of the fin, whereas no such correlation was observed for Astyanax altiparanae Garutti & Britski, 2000 and Acestrorhynchus lacustris (Lütken, 1875). -
Characterization of the Commercial Fish Production Landed at Manaus, Amazonas State, Brazil
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE COMMERCIAL FISH PRODUCTION LANDED AT MANAUS, AMAZONAS STATE, BRAZIL Vandick da Silva BATISTA1, Miguel PETRERE JÚNIOR2 ABSTRACT: The present work aims to update a series of information about the regional fishing production, by presenting and characterizing the contribution of the different sub-systems of the Amazon basin to the catch landed at the main fishing market of Manaus, Brazil, from 1994 to 1996. Collectors specifically hired for this function registered key information on the fisheries. Thirty nine types or groups of fish were found in the fishing production landed. Jaraqui (Semaprochilodus spp.), curimatã (Prochilodus nigricans), pacu (Myleinae), matrinchã (Brycon cephalus), sardine (Triportheus spp.), aracu (Anostomidae) and tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) were the most important items during three consecutive years. In 1994 these items summed up 91.6% of the total production; in 1995 and 1996 these values were, respectively, 85.3% and 86.4% of the total production. Tambaqui landed decreased remarkably during the period 1976-1996. There was a strong seasonal component in the production of the main species; jaraqui and matrinchã were mostly landed between April and June, while curimatã, pacu, and sardine were mostly landed during the dry season. Other important items showed a strong inter-annual variation in their production. The fishing production landed came mostly from the sub-system of the Purus River (around 30% of the total production). The sub¬ system of the Medium-Solimões contributed with an average of 15% and the sub-systems of the Madeira, Lower-Solimões, Upper-Amazon and Juruá, together contributed with 11.5% of the total production landed. -
State of the Amazon: Freshwater Connectivity and Ecosystem Health WWF LIVING AMAZON INITIATIVE SUGGESTED CITATION
REPORT LIVING AMAZON 2015 State of the Amazon: Freshwater Connectivity and Ecosystem Health WWF LIVING AMAZON INITIATIVE SUGGESTED CITATION Macedo, M. and L. Castello. 2015. State of the Amazon: Freshwater Connectivity and Ecosystem Health; edited by D. Oliveira, C. C. Maretti and S. Charity. Brasília, Brazil: WWF Living Amazon Initiative. 136pp. PUBLICATION INFORMATION State of the Amazon Series editors: Cláudio C. Maretti, Denise Oliveira and Sandra Charity. This publication State of the Amazon: Freshwater Connectivity and Ecosystem Health: Publication editors: Denise Oliveira, Cláudio C. Maretti, and Sandra Charity. Publication text editors: Sandra Charity and Denise Oliveira. Core Scientific Report (chapters 1-6): Written by Marcia Macedo and Leandro Castello; scientific assessment commissioned by WWF Living Amazon Initiative (LAI). State of the Amazon: Conclusions and Recommendations (chapter 7): Cláudio C. Maretti, Marcia Macedo, Leandro Castello, Sandra Charity, Denise Oliveira, André S. Dias, Tarsicio Granizo, Karen Lawrence WWF Living Amazon Integrated Approaches for a More Sustainable Development in the Pan-Amazon Freshwater Connectivity Cláudio C. Maretti; Sandra Charity; Denise Oliveira; Tarsicio Granizo; André S. Dias; and Karen Lawrence. Maps: Paul Lefebvre/Woods Hole Research Center (WHRC); Valderli Piontekwoski/Amazon Environmental Research Institute (IPAM, Portuguese acronym); and Landscape Ecology Lab /WWF Brazil. Photos: Adriano Gambarini; André Bärtschi; Brent Stirton/Getty Images; Denise Oliveira; Edison Caetano; and Ecosystem Health Fernando Pelicice; Gleilson Miranda/Funai; Juvenal Pereira; Kevin Schafer/naturepl.com; María del Pilar Ramírez; Mark Sabaj Perez; Michel Roggo; Omar Rocha; Paulo Brando; Roger Leguen; Zig Koch. Front cover Mouth of the Teles Pires and Juruena rivers forming the Tapajós River, on the borders of Mato Grosso, Amazonas and Pará states, Brazil. -
Field Guide to the Culture of Tambaqui (Colossoma Macropomum, Cuvier, 1816) Field Guide to the Culture of Tambaqui ( Colossoma Macropomum , Cuvier, 1816)
ISSN 2070-7010 FAO 624 FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE TECHNICAL PAPER 624 Field guide to the culture of tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum, Cuvier, 1816) Field guide to the culture of tambaqui ( Following a short introduction to the species and its closest commercially viable related species, namely pirapatinga (Piaractus brachypomus) and pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus), this field guide provides practical information on the culture and reproduction of tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum). Colossoma macropomum As a field guide it aims to support the understanding and dissemination of applicable technologies for the culture and reproduction of tambaqui, i.e. what should be done – as well as when and how it should be done – in order to achieve success in the artificial propagation as well as the fingerling and table fish production stages. The concise technical descriptions in this guide are accompanied by self-explanatory illustrations and a reader-friendly glossary of technical terms, which is important for tambaqui aquaculture farmers. , Cuvier, 1816) ISBN 978-92-5-131242-1 ISSN 2070-7010 978 9251 312421 FAO CA2955EN/1/01.19 Cover photographs: ©FAO/András Woynárovich. Illustrations and photos in this Technical Paper are courtesy of András Woynárovich. Images and photos courtesy of other authors are indicated separately. FAO FISHERIES AND Field guide AQUACULTURE TECHNICAL to the culture of tambaqui PAPER (Colossoma macropomum, 624 Cuvier, 1816) by András Woynárovich FAO Consultant Budapest, Hungary and Raymon Van Anrooy Fishery Industry Officer Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Rome, Italy FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2019 Required citation Woynárovich, A. and Van Anrooy, R. 2019. Field guide to the culture of tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum, Cuvier, 1816). -
Relatório Final (2017-2018)
MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE INSTITUTO CHICO MENDES DE CONSERVAÇÃO DA BIODIVERSIDADE PARQUE NACIONAL DO JURUENA AM/MT Programa Institucional de Bolsas de Iniciação Científica do Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade- PIBIC/ICMBio Relatório Final (2017-2018) INVENTÁRIO DA ICTIOFAUNA DE CORPOS D’ ÁGUA DO PARNA JURUENA – MT, BRASIL Estudante de IC: Luciano Dias da Conceição Orientadora: Lourdes Iarema Co-Orientadora: Solange Arrolho Alta Floresta – MT Agosto - 2018 RESUMO A bacia Amazônica conserva uma hidrografia composta por inúmeros e imensos rios, igarapés e lagos, onde pouco se conhece sobre a sua taxonomia, distribuição, biologia e ecologia dos peixe desta região. Por esta necessidade o presente estudo tem por objetivo contribuir na realização do levantamento ictiofaunístico em corpos d´água do Parque Nacional do Juruena. Foram realizadas coletas no Rio Juruena e em igarapés dentro do parque, em 2017 e 2018, foram estabelecidos seis (6) trechos no rio Juruena e em sete (7) igarapés, as coletas foram realizadas com o uso de puçás, rede de arrasto, rede de espera e pesca. As amostras foram fixadas em solução de formalina a 10% no local de coleta e transportadas ao Laboratório de Ictiologia da Amazônia Meridional, na Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso, UNEMAT, onde foram identificadas e incorporados à coleção. Na coleta realizada no rio Juruena foram coletados 1654 exemplares, distribuídos em 6 ordens, 26 famílias 62 gêneros e 98 espécies. Coletas realizadas nos igarapés constaram 357 exemplares, distribuídos em 5 ordens 18 famílias, 38 gêneros e 68 espécies. Foi realizado incisão abdominal para determinação de sexo e estádio de maturação gonadal, e determinação da dieta alimentar.