DOCSLIB.ORG

The Coins from the Necropolis "Metlata" Near the Village of Rupite

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Coins from the Necropolis margarita ANDONOVA the coins from the necropolis "metlata" near the village of rupite... THE COINS FROM THE NECROPOLIS METLATA NEAR THE VILLAGE "OF RUPITE" (F. MULETAROVO), MUNICIPALITY OF PETRICH by Margarita ANDONOVA, Regional Museum of History– Blagoevgrad This article sets to describe and introduce known as Charon's fee was registered through the in scholarly debate the numismatic data findspots of the coins on the skeleton; specifically, generated during the 1985-1988 archaeological these coins were found near the head, the pelvis, excavations at one of the necropoleis situated in the left arm and the legs. In cremations in situ, the locality "Metlata" near the village of Rupite. coins were placed either inside the grave or in The necropolis belongs to the long-known urns made of stone or clay, as well as in bowls "urban settlement" situated on the southern placed next to them. It is noteworthy that out of slopes of Kozhuh hill, at the confluence of 167 graves, coins were registered only in 52, thus the Strumeshnitsa and Struma Rivers, and accounting for less than 50%. The absence of now identified with Heraclea Sintica. The coins in some graves can probably be attributed archaeological excavations were conducted by to the fact that "in Greek society, there was no Yulia Bozhinova from the Regional Museum of established dogma about the way in which the History, Blagoevgrad. souls of the dead travelled to the realm of Hades" The graves number 167 and are located (Зубарь 1982, 108). According to written sources, within an area of ​​750 m². Coins were found mainly Euripides, it is clear that the deceased in 52 graves, both Hellenistic and Roman, may be accompanied to the underworld not only and 10 coins originate from areas (squares) by Charon, but also by Hermes or Thanatos. in-between. The numismatic data makes it This exemplifies the absence of fast rules and possible to determine fairly accurately the regulations in the Greek world in terms of the chronology of the necropolis, which was not Charon's fee (Зубарь 1982, 108). It is important to excavated in its entirety. The earliest coins note, however, that its practice continued during belong to the last decade of the 4th century BC, the process of Christianization through 4th to the and the latest date to the mid 4th century AD, end of 5th century AD (Кацарова, Хаджиангелов with no interruptions. 2002, 229-230). This can be seen in the necropolis The coins are exclusively made of bronze "Metlata," as evident from coins found in graves and copper, with the exception of a gold exonumia dated to the middle of 4th century AD. (Pl. 2, 21). In addition to being an important The majority of the coins found in chronological marker, coins provide an idea of ​​ the necropolis belong to medium and small the social status of the population and the nature denominations (19/20 mm-10 mm). This fact, of coin circulation in the town associated with along with the metal from which they were made, the necropolis. The practice of a funerary rite points to the idea that they were used as a local 255 papers of the american research center in sofia, vol. 2 margarita ANDONOVA the coins from the necropolis "metlata" near the village of rupite... means of payment in commercial transactions by issues. Because of this, I am inclined to think the Autariatae situated along the Middle and At necropolis "Metlata" the coinage of the Greek/Macedonian settlers of the town. that the coins mark an important point in the Lower Iskar River, and from there created Demetrius I Poliorcetes is represented by two The earliest specimen of the group of Hellenistic history of the town. The date of troubles for the Paeonians, who turned to coins minted in 294-287 BC. In 294 BC Demetrius Hellenistic coins is a bronze issue of Philip II these coins bring up the often quoted passage Cassander for protection. She dates the joint took advantage of the dynastic quarrels between of Macedonia (359-336 BC) of the type "Head in Diodorus, according to which, in 310 BC, Macedonian–Paeonian actions against the Cassander's sons (Antipater II and Alexander of Apollo/horseman" (Pl. 1, 1). This coin does "in Macedonia Cassander helped Audoleon, Autariatae to 313/312 BC (Тачева 1987, 28; IV) and almost without a fight, backed by the not fix the foundation date of the town, but king of the Paeonians, who was fighting against 42-43). As an upshot of Cassander's victory troops, he was pronounced a king of Macedonia rather confirms the opinion, already expressed, the Autariatae, freeding the king from danger, over the Autariatae, which written sources, in (Драганов 2001, 79). His rule lasted until 287 that the coins of Phillip II and his successor, but the Autariatae with the children and conjunction with the coins recovered from the BC, when, pressured by the troops of Pyrrhus Alexander III, remain in circulation until the women who were following them, numbering necropolis "Metlata" put in the last decade of and Lysimachus, Demetrius was forced to give very end of the 4th century BC, at which point in all twenty thousand, he settled beside the the 4th century BC near Mount Orbelos, a new up the Macedonian throne to his son Antigonus they were superseded by the issues of Cassander mountain called Orbelos" (Diod. 20.19.1). Hellenistic polis was founded on Macedonian II Gonatas, who was appointed governor of the and Lysimachus. This is the case not just in Two large coin hoards, one from Rezhantsi territory. This was a common practice among remaining Greek estates of Demetrius. Despite the Macedonia, but also in inner Thrace, where (IGCH 411) and one from Skopje (IGCH 410), the Diadochi, who saw the establishment of instability at the time of his assumption of power, such coins make up a significant portion of the include Macedonian and Paeonian coins, and fortified centers within their territories as a the subsequent crucial political changes in the non-Thracian currencies. A salient example of could be mentioned in support of Diodorus' means to secure their claims for supremacy in Hellenistic world made it possible for Antigonus this is the early Hellenistic town of Seuthopolis, description of the union between Cassander Alexander's empire (Nankov 2008, 56). II Gonatas to "ride the wave" (Драганов 2001, where the Macedonian bronzes, primarily coins and the Paeonian king Audoleon against the Cassander's dynasty, discontinued in 84). In 281 BC, following the death of Lysimachus of Cassander and Lysimachus, boost the urban invasion of the Autariatae. Both hoards consist of 294 BC, was followed by that of the Antigonids, near Kouroupedion, Thrace and Macedonia economy and prompt the introduction of the several thousand coins, suggestive of a military- founded by Antigonus I Monophtalmus, who were briefly under the rule of Seleucus I and Thracian bronze coins by the Thracian dynast administrative origin (Димитров 1990, 27). The assumed the title basileus in 306 BC along Ptolemaeus Keraunos. In 279 BC, invading Celts Seuthes III (Димитров, Пенчев 1984, 41-42). Rezhantsi hoard was recovered not far from with his son Demetrius I Poliorcetes, after defeated and killed the latter. At this first stage Foreign researchers have long commented the Pernik fortress, which, according to some Demetrius' formidable victory over the fleet of Antigonus Gonatas did not engage the Celts, as on the similarity between the design and scholars, is Macedonian, perhaps a border fort Ptolemeus I's near Salamis. In his biography he was forced to defend the Macedonian throne construction of the fortification system of founded at the time of Phillip II (Домарадски of Demetrius, Plutarch recounts that after they from Antiochus I, son of Seleucus I, through Seuthopolis, with the so-called "tetragonal plan" 1982, 48). Thus it is plausible that Cassander also learned of his victory, the friends of Antigonus diplomatic maneuvering. The favorable outcome demonstrated in Macedonian towns founded, or made use of this fortress during the expatriation crowned him with a diadem and sent to his of those negotiations, however, allowed Antigonus restored, by Cassander, including Cassandreia, of the Autariatae. At the same time, archaeological son a wreath and a message that named him Gonatas to disembark on the shores of Thrace, Thessaloniki, Pella, Vergina, Lete, and Dion. data confirms beyond doubt the presence of a king. About a year later, sometime around somewhere near Lysimachia, and in 277 BC, he These parallels enrich our understanding of the Triballoi in the Pernik and Breznik regions, 305/304 BC, Lysimachus and Cassander also won a decisive victory over the Celts (Драганов Seuthopolis' architectural planning and, "provide raising the question of their involvement in claimed the title (Йорданов 2000, 190). In 2001, 85). an opportunity of perceiving Seuthopolis not the union between the Macedonians and the 323 BC Lysimachus had received Thrace as his There are six Antigonus II Gonatas' only as a Hellenized Thracian city but also as a Paeonians. The volume and type of coins included domain; the most strategic part of his territories bronze coins found in the necropolis "Metlata." 'petrified' fortified camp following Macedonian in yet another hoard at Vlasatnitsa (IGCH 424), included the southern fringes of Thrace, One belongs to the series "Head of Athena/ inspiration" (Nankov 2008, 48). found not far from Vratsa and resembling the along the Aegean and Propontic coast, from Pan raising a trophy" – a "clear reference to the To the reign of the Macedonian ruler Rhezhantsi and Skopje hoards, also supports such the Thracian Chersonessos to the Strandzha famous battle of Antigonus Gonatas with the Cassander are attributed the largest group of a joint venture.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4, Section 1
    Hellenistic Civilization 324 - 100 BC Philip II of Macedonia . The Macedonians were viewed as barbarians. By the 5th century BC, the Macedonians had emerged as a powerful kingdom in the north. In 359 BC, Philip II became king, and he turned Macedonia into the chief power in the Greek world. Philip II Philip II of Macedonia . The Macedonians were viewed as barbarians. By the 5th century BC, the Macedonians had emerged as a powerful kingdom in the north. In 359 BC, Philip II became king, and he turned Macedonia into the chief power in the Greek world. Philip was a great admirer of Greek culture, and he wanted to unite all of Greece under Macedonian rule. Fearing Philip, Athens allied with a number of other Greek city-states to fight the Macedonians. In 338, the Macedonians crushed the Greeks. After quickly gaining control over most of the Greek city-states, Philip turned to Sparta. He sent them a message, "You are advised to submit without further delay, for if I bring my army into your land, I will destroy your farms, slay your people, and raze your city." . Their reply was “if", both Philip and his son, Alexander, would leave the Spartans alone. By 336 BC, Philip was preparing to invade the Persian Empire when he was assassinated. The murder occurred during the celebration of his daughter’s marriage, while the king was entering the theater, he was killed by the captain his bodyguards. Alexander the Great . Alexander III was born in 356 BC. When Alexander was 13, his father Philip chose Aristotle as his tutor, and in return for teaching Alexander, Philip agreed to rebuild Aristotle's hometown which Philip had razed.
    [Show full text]
  • VU Research Portal
    VU Research Portal The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon Pirngruber, R. 2012 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) Pirngruber, R. (2012). The impact of empire on market prices in Babylon: in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 - 140 B.C. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. R. Pirngruber VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT THE IMPACT OF EMPIRE ON MARKET PRICES IN BABYLON in the Late Achaemenid and Seleucid periods, ca. 400 – 140 B.C. ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomasz Grabowski Jagiellonian University, Kraków*
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 21 (2014): 21–41 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.14.001.2778 www.ejournals.eu/electrum THE CULT OF THE PTOLEMIES IN THE AEGEAN IN THE 3RD CENTURY BC Tomasz Grabowski Jagiellonian University, Kraków* Abstract: The cult of the Ptolemies spread in various ways. Apart from the Lagids, the initiative came from poleis themselves; private cult was also very important. The ruler cult, both that organ- ised directly by the Ptolemaic authorities and that established by poleis, was tangibly benefi cial for the Ptolemaic foreign policy. The dynastic cult became one of the basic instruments of political activity in the region, alongside acts of euergetism. It seems that Ptolemy II played the biggest role in introducing the ruler cult as a foreign policy measure. He was probably responsible for bringing his father’s nickname Soter to prominence. He also played the decisive role in popularising the cult of Arsinoe II, emphasising her role as protector of sailors and guarantor of the monarchy’s prosperity and linking her to cults accentuating the warrior nature of female deities. Ptolemy II also used dynastic festivals as vehicles of dynastic propaganda and ideology and a means to popu- larise the cult. The ruler cult became one of the means of communication between the subordinate cities and the Ptolemies. It also turned out to be an important platform in contacts with the poleis which were loosely or not at all subjugated by the Lagids. The establishment of divine honours for the Ptolemies by a polis facilitated closer relations and created a friendly atmosphere and a certain emotional bond.
    [Show full text]
  • The How Behind the Roman Pax
    The How Behind Roman Pax: Selected Roman Operations Aimed at Establishing Peace and their Lessons for Modern Peace Operations Brian E Frydenborg 7/1/2011 Rev. November 2011 July 2011- Independent Study GMU Dr. Bonnie Stabile 1 1 Scene from the film “Agora,” dir. Alejandro Amenábar, 2009. Readers are simultaneously entertained and educated by an account of causes and by seeing people choose the better course in any given situation -Polybius, The Histories 6.2 Lucullus now turned his attention to the cities in Asia in order that, while he was at leisure from military enterprises, he might do something for the furtherance of justice and law. -Plutarch, Parallel Lives, The Life of Lucullus 20 Let us see if by moderation we can win all hearts and secure a lasting victory, since by cruelty others have been unable to escape from hatred and to maintain their victory for any length of time…This is a new way of conquering, to strengthen one’s position by kindness and generosity. As to how this can be done, some ideas have occurred to me and many more can be found. I should like you to turn some attention to the matter. -Caesar, Caesar to Oppius and Cornelius, Greeting 1 Preface a.) Why I Chose This Topic For much of American history until relatively recently, the educated elites of America, from the colonial era until into the 20th century, were steeped in an education that emphasized the Greco-Roman classics, learning Greek and Latin, and reading the authors of antiquity. Such trends were especially exemplified by the Founding Fathers.
    [Show full text]
  • Johnny Okane (Order #7165245) Introduction to the Hurlbat Publishing Edition
    johnny okane (order #7165245) Introduction to the Hurlbat Publishing Edition Weloe to the Hurlat Pulishig editio of Miro Warfare “eries: Miro Ancients This series of games was original published by Tabletop Games in the 1970s with this title being published in 1976. Each game in the series aims to recreate the feel of tabletop wargaming with large numbers of miniatures but using printed counters and terrain so that games can be played in a small space and are very cost-effective. In these new editions we have kept the rules and most of the illustrations unchanged but have modernised the layout and counter designs to refresh the game. These basic rules can be further enhanced through the use of the expansion sets below, which each add new sets of army counters and rules to the core game: Product Subject Additional Armies Expansion I Chariot Era & Far East Assyrian; Chinese; Egyptian Expansion II Classical Era Indian; Macedonian; Persian; Selucid Expansion III Enemies of Rome Britons; Gallic; Goth Expansion IV Fall of Rome Byzantine; Hun; Late Roman; Sassanid Expansion V The Dark Ages Norman; Saxon; Viking Happy gaming! Kris & Dave Hurlbat July 2012 © Copyright 2012 Hurlbat Publishing Edited by Kris Whitmore Contents Introduction to the Hurlbat Publishing Edition ................................................................................................................................... 2 Move Procedures ...............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Literary Sources
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82860-4 — The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest 2nd Edition Index More Information Index A Literary sources Livy XXVI.24.7–15: 77 (a); XXIX.12.11–16: 80; XXXI.44.2–9: 11 Aeschines III.132–4: 82; XXXIII.38: 195; XXXVII.40–1: Appian, Syrian Wars 52–5, 57–8, 62–3: 203; XXXVIII.34: 87; 57 XXXIX.24.1–4: 89; XLI.20: 209 (b); ‘Aristeas to Philocrates’ I.9–11 and XLII.29–30.7: 92; XLII.51: 94; 261 V.35–40: XLV.29.3–30 and 32.1–7: 96 15 [Aristotle] Oeconomica II.2.33: I Maccabees 1.1–9: 24; 1.10–25 and 5 7 Arrian, Alexander I.17: ; II.14: ; 41–56: 217; 15.1–9: 221 8 9 III.1.5–2.2: (a); III.3–4: ; II Maccabees 3.1–3: 216 12 13 IV.10.5–12.5: ; V.28–29.1: ; Memnon, FGrH 434 F 11 §§5.7–11: 159 14 20 V1.27.3–5: ; VII.1.1–4: ; Menander, The Sicyonian lines 3–15: 104 17 18 VII.4.4–5: ; VII.8–9 and 11: Menecles of Barca FGrHist 270F9:322 26 Arrian, FGrH 156 F 1, §§1–8: (a); F 9, Pausanias I.7: 254; I.9.4: 254; I.9.5–10: 30 §§34–8: 56; I.25.3–6: 28; VII.16.7–17.1: Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae V.201b–f, 100 258 43 202f–203e: ; VI.253b–f: Plutarch, Agis 5–6.1 and 7.5–8: 69 23 Augustine, City of God 4.4: Alexander 10.6–11: 3 (a); 15: 4 (a); Demetrius of Phalerum, FGrH 228 F 39: 26.3–10: 8 (b); 68.3: cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult
    ΑΡΣΙΝΟΗ ΕΥΠΛΟΙΑ Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult Carlos Francis Robinson Bachelor of Arts (Hons. 1) A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2019 Historical and Philosophical Inquiry Abstract Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult By the early Hellenistic period a trend was emerging in which royal women were deified as Aphrodite. In a unique innovation, Queen Arsinoë II of Egypt (c. 316 – 270 BC) was deified as the maritime Aphrodite, and was associated with the cult titles Euploia, Akraia, and Galenaië. It was the important study of Robert (1966) which identified that the poets Posidippus and Callimachus were honouring Arsinoë II as the maritime Aphrodite. This thesis examines how this new third-century BC cult of ‘Arsinoë Aphrodite’ adopted aspects of Greek cults of the maritime Aphrodite, creating a new derivative cult. The main historical sources for this cult are the epigrams of Posidippus and Callimachus, including a relatively new epigram (Posidippus AB 39) published in 2001. This thesis demonstrates that the new cult of Arsinoë Aphrodite utilised existing traditions, such as: Aphrodite’s role as patron of fleets, the practice of dedications to Aphrodite by admirals, the use of invocations before sailing, and the practice of marine dedications such as shells. In this way the Ptolemies incorporated existing religious traditions into a new form of ruler cult. This study is the first attempt to trace the direct relationship between Ptolemaic ruler cult and existing traditions of the maritime Aphrodite, and deepens our understanding of the strategies of ruler cult adopted in the early Hellenistic period.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Note : Geographical landmarks are listed under the proper name itself: for “Cape Sepias” or “Mt. Athos” see “Sepias” or “Athos.” When a people and a toponym share the same base, see under the toponym: for “Thessalians” see “Thessaly.” Romans are listed according to the nomen, i.e. C. Julius Caesar. With places or people mentioned once only, discretion has been used. Abdera 278 Aeaces II 110, 147 Abydus 222, 231 A egae 272–273 Acanthus 85, 207–208, 246 Aegina 101, 152, 157–158, 187–189, Acarnania 15, 189, 202, 204, 206, 251, 191, 200 347, 391, 393 Aegium 377, 389 Achaia 43, 54, 64 ; Peloponnesian Aegospotami 7, 220, 224, 228 Achaia, Achaian League 9–10, 12–13, Aemilius Paullus, L. 399, 404 54–56, 63, 70, 90, 250, 265, 283, 371, Aeolis 16–17, 55, 63, 145, 233 375–380, 388–390, 393, 397–399, 404, Aeschines 281, 285, 288 410 ; Phthiotic Achaia 16, 54, 279, Aeschylus 156, 163, 179 286 Aetoli Erxadieis 98–101 Achaian War 410 Aetolia, Aetolian League 12, 15, 70, Achaius 382–383, 385, 401 204, 250, 325, 329, 342, 347–348, Acilius Glabrio, M. 402 376, 378–380, 387, 390–391, 393, Acragas 119, COPYRIGHTED165, 259–261, 263, 266, 39MATERIAL6–397, 401–404 352–354, 358–359 Agariste 113, 117 Acrocorinth 377, 388–389 Agathocles (Lysimachus ’ son) 343, 345 ; Acrotatus 352, 355 (King of Sicily) 352–355, 358–359; Actium 410, 425 (King of Bactria) 413–414 Ada 297 Agelaus 391, 410 A History of Greece: 1300 to 30 BC, First Edition. Victor Parker.
    [Show full text]
  • The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2012 Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier Wai Kit Wicky Tse University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Asian History Commons, Asian Studies Commons, and the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Tse, Wai Kit Wicky, "Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier" (2012). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 589. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/589 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/589 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dynamics of Disintegration: The Later Han Empire (25-220CE) & Its Northwestern Frontier Abstract As a frontier region of the Qin-Han (221BCE-220CE) empire, the northwest was a new territory to the Chinese realm. Until the Later Han (25-220CE) times, some portions of the northwestern region had only been part of imperial soil for one hundred years. Its coalescence into the Chinese empire was a product of long-term expansion and conquest, which arguably defined the egionr 's military nature. Furthermore, in the harsh natural environment of the region, only tough people could survive, and unsurprisingly, the region fostered vigorous warriors. Mixed culture and multi-ethnicity featured prominently in this highly militarized frontier society, which contrasted sharply with the imperial center that promoted unified cultural values and stood in the way of a greater degree of transregional integration. As this project shows, it was the northwesterners who went through a process of political peripheralization during the Later Han times played a harbinger role of the disintegration of the empire and eventually led to the breakdown of the early imperial system in Chinese history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antigonids and the Ruler Cult. Global and Local Perspectives?
    The Antigonids and the Ruler Cult Global and Local Perspectives? 1 Franca Landucci DOI – 10.7358/erga-2016-002-land AbsTRACT – Demetrius Poliorketes is considered by modern scholars the true founder of ruler cult. In particular the Athenians attributed him several divine honors between 307 and 290 BC. The ancient authors in general consider these honors in a negative perspec- tive, while offering words of appreciation about an ideal sovereignty intended as a glorious form of servitude and embodied in Antigonus Gonatas, Demetrius Poliorketes’ son and heir. An analysis of the epigraphic evidences referring to this king leads to the conclusion that Antigonus Gonatas did not officially encourage the worship towards himself. KEYWORDS – Antigonids, Antigonus Gonatas, Demetrius Poliorketes, Hellenism, ruler cult. Antigonidi, Antigono Gonata, culto del sovrano, Demetrio Poliorcete, ellenismo. Modern scholars consider Demetrius Poliorketes the true founder of ruler cult due to the impressively vast literary tradition on the divine honours bestowed upon this historical figure, especially by Athens, between the late fourth and the early third century BC 2. As evidenced also in modern bib- liography, these honours seem to climax in the celebration of Poliorketes as deus praesens in the well-known ithyphallus dedicated to him by the Athenians around 290 3. Documentation is however pervaded by a tone that is strongly hostile to the granting of such honours. Furthermore, despite the fact that it has been handed down to us through Roman Imperial writers like Diodorus, Plutarch and Athenaeus, the tradition reflects a tendency contemporary to the age of the Diadochi, since these same authors refer, often explicitly, to a 1 All dates are BC, unless otherwise stated.
    [Show full text]
  • Pag 289-308 Damyanov
    TALANTA XXXVI-XXXVII (2004-2005) NOTES ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ODESSOS AND ITS VICINITY UNTIL EARLY HELLENISTIC TIMES Supplementum Ponticum 3 Margarit Damyanov This article is an attempt to trace the development of a small part of the pres - ent-day Bulgarian Black Sea coast from 6th to the 3rd century BC, i.e. from the beginning of the Greek colonisation up till Early Hellenistic times, and more precisely the changes in the latter period. This article covers the area from Odessos and its immediate vicinity to Cape Kaliakra in the northeast. Along this part of the littoral there are a few ancient sites that are related to the Greek colonisation in this area. This is first of all Odessos (present-day Varna), the earliest apoikia in the region. To the northeast are Dionysopolis (Balchik), Bizone (Kavarna) and Tirizis (Kaliakra). Each one of these sites is specific on its own. It is necessary to begin with the chronology of the Greek colonisation. The foundation of Odessos does not raise significant problems. According to Pseudo-Skymnos the city was founded by Milesians when Astyages ruled the Medes ( Ps-Skymnos 748-750). From the two alternative reigns of Astyages – 598/7–560 BC (Eusebius and Hieronymus) or 584–549 BC (Herodotus) – the latter is more likely, as in the last analysis on that matter, K. Boshnakov pro - posed a foundation date for Odessos in the time from 584 to 575 BC, when the Medes made war against the Lydian kingdom (Boshnakov 2004, 179- 181). Archaeological finds confirm a date in the second quarter of the 6th cen - tury BC (Lazarov 1998, 91; Minchev 2003, 213-214).
    [Show full text]
  • The Successors: Alexander's Legacy
    The Successors: Alexander’s Legacy November 20-22, 2015 Committee Background Guide The Successors: Alexander’s Legacy 1 Table of Contents Committee Director Welcome Letter ...........................................................................................2 Summons to the Babylon Council ................................................................................................3 The History of Macedon and Alexander ......................................................................................4 The Rise of Macedon and the Reign of Philip II ..........................................................................4 The Persian Empire ......................................................................................................................5 The Wars of Alexander ................................................................................................................5 Alexander’s Plans and Death .......................................................................................................7 Key Topics ......................................................................................................................................8 Succession of the Throne .............................................................................................................8 Partition of the Satrapies ............................................................................................................10 Continuity and Governance ........................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]