E U R Op E a N a V Ia T Ion S a F E T Y a G E Nc Y an N U Al

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

E U R Op E a N a V Ia T Ion S a F E T Y a G E Nc Y an N U Al ANNUAL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS REVIEW 2017 SAFETYANNUAL RECOMMENDATIONS 2017 EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AVIATION EUROPEAN AGENCY Catalogue number ISBN ISSN DOI PDF TO-AE-18-001-EN-N 978-92-9210-212-8 2599-7793 10.2822/177336 EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY SAFETY ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH DEPARTMENT Designed in Luxembourg Strategy & Safety Management Directorate Safety Intelligence & Performance Department Annual Safety Recommendations Review 2017 Disclaimer: Neither the European Aviation Safety Agency, nor any person acting on behalf of the European Aviation Safety Agency is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. The Annual Safety Recommendations Review is produced by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). This edition provides an overview of the safety recommendations that have been addressed to EASA in 2017. It also presents the replies produced during the year. This annual review aims at providing a feedback on the follow-up given to safety recommendations in the con- text of openness, transparency and accountability that characterises the European Public Administration. Apart from its safety related information character, this review is also expected to provide relevant information related to raised safety concerns, both for EASA itself, as well as its stakeholders, including the European public. Image credits Chapter 0- Vasco Morao Chapter 1- iStock Chapter 2- Samuel Pernet Chapter 3-Alina Daliani Chapter 4- iStock Chapter 5- iStock Chapter 6- Arjan Van Dijk Annex A- iStock Annex B- Gilles Gardiol Annex C- iStock © European Aviation Safety Agency, 2018. All rights reserved. Proprietary document. Printed copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA-Internet site: www.easa.europa.eu. 2017 Annual Safety Recommendations Review Contents 0 Abbreviation list 5 1 Executive summary 7 2 Introduction 10 3 Safety Recommendations received in 2017 13 3.1 Overview of Safety Recommendations received in 2017 .....................................................................14 3.2 Origin of the Safety Recommendations received in 2017 ....................................................................16 3.3 Involvement in accident and serious incident investigations .............................................................20 4 Safety Recommendations replies in 2017 23 4.1 Overview of Safety Recommendations replies in 2017 ........................................................................24 4.2 Status of the Safety Recommendations replies in 2017 .......................................................................25 5 Overview of key safety topics processed and actions carried out in 2017 28 5.1 Large aeroplane cabin and passenger safety - emergency evacuation ..............................................30 5.2 Encountering severe turbulence at high altitude.................................................................................32 5.3 Runway surface conditions and aircraft ground anti/de-icing ............................................................33 5.4 Helicopters performing CAT operations ...............................................................................................35 5.5 Flight simulation training and other flight training exercises .............................................................37 5.6 General Aviation (GA) – various aspects in the frame of airworthiness .............................................39 5.7 Unmanned Aircraft (UA) ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������40 5.8 Ballistic Parachute Recovery Systems (BPRS) ........................................................................................41 6 Conclusions 43 ANNEX A: List of 2017 Safety Recommendations Replies 45 ANNEX B: Definitions 226 ANNEX C : Safety Recommendations classification 230 2017 Annual Safety Recommendations Review PAGE 4 List of Figures Figure 1: Safety Recommendations addressed to EASA per year .......................................................... 14 Figure 2: Annual Safety Recommendations by occurrence class 2012-2017 ......................................... 15 Figure 3: Safety Recommendations received in 2017 by Type of Operation and Aircraft Category .........16 Figure 4: Origin of Safety Recommendations received by EASA ........................................................... 17 Figure 5: States contribution to Safety Recommendations received in 2017 ....................................... 18 Figure 6: EASA responses to safety recommendations in 2017 by year received ................................. 24 Figure 7: Safety Recommendation Responses sent in 2017 [status, total number] .............................. 25 Figure 8: Response assessment received by originator on EASA Final Replies sent in 2017 [percentage, reference date: 26.03.2018] .................................................................................. 26 Figure 9: Assessment EASA received on the Final Responses sent in 2017 [total, reference date: 26.03.2018] .......................................................................................................... 27 Figure 10: Safety Recommendations addressed to EASA per topic by EU SIAs .................................... 29 CHAPTER 0 CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 4 CHAPTER 5 CHAPTER 6 Abbreviation list ANNEX A. ANNEX B. ANNEX C. 2017 Annual Safety Recommendations Review Abbreviation list PAGE 6 AD Airworthiness Directive AFM Aircraft Flight Manual AAIB UK Air Accidents Investigation Branch United Kingdom AMC Acceptable Means of Compliance ANSV Italian National Agency for the Safety of Flight BEA Bureau d’Enquête et d’Analyse pour l’Aviation Civile CAT Commercial Air Transport CIAIAC Civil Aviation Accidents and Incidents Investigation Commission CM Certification Memo CRI Certification Review Item CRM Crew Resource Management CS Certification Specifications CS-LSA Certification Specifications for Light Sport Aeroplanes CVR Cockpit Voice Recorder DSB Dutch Safety Board ELT Emergency Locator Transmitter ENCASIA European Network of Civil Aviation Safety Investigation Authorities EPAS European Plan for Aviation Safety ETOPS Extended Operation ETSO European Technical Standard Order EU European Union FAA Federal Aviation Administration FCOM Flight Crew Operating Manual FDM Flight Data Monitoring GA General Aviation GM Guidance Material HEMS Helicopter Emergency Medical Service HOFO Helicopter Offshore Operations ICAO International Civil Aviation Organisation ICCAIA International Coordination Council for Aerospace Industry Associations ILS Instrument Landing System LOC-I Loss of control-inflight MOPSC Maximum Operational Passenger Seating Configuration MS Member States NCO Non-Commercial operations with Other than complex motor-powered aircraft NTSB National Transportation Safety Board PED Portable Electronic Devices RE Runway Excursion RMT Rulemaking Task SIA Safety Investigation Authority SIB Safety Information Bulletin SRGC Safety Recommendation of Global Concern SRUR Safety Recommendations of Union-wide Relevance STC Supplemental Type Certificates STSB Swiss Transportation Safety Investigation Board VFR Visual Flight Rules CHAPTER 0 CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 4 CHAPTER 5 CHAPTER 6 Executive summary ANNEX A. ANNEX B. ANNEX C. 2017 Annual Safety Recommendations Review Executive summary PAGE 8 Executive summary The Annual Safety Recommendations Review provides infor mation on the activity carried out by the Agency in the field of safety investigation and follow-up. In addition, the review highlights a range of safety issues and Agency safety improvement efforts that are of interest to the European Aviation Community and the public. This 11th edition reviews the 2017 activity and presents: General statistical data on the safety recommendations addressed by safety investigation authorities to EASA in 2017; Replies that EASA has given to safety recommendations in 2017; Main safety topics related to the above mentioned recommendations and/or replies that have been addressed through actions taken. At the European Union level, the principles governing the investigation of accidents and serious incidents are defined in Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the investigation and prevention of accidents and incidents in civil aviation. Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 imple- ments international standards and recommended practices as described in Annex 13 to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation. During the last 10 years the Agency has become the main actor in safety investigation follow-up within Europe and this has also been reflected in the establishment of a robust and rigorous processing of the safety recom- mendations received. Owing to EASA central posi tioning in the system, the Agency is able to take actions with respect to systemic problems and other issues in the management of risk. The implementation of safety recommendations provides tangible improvements in safety as a result of infor- mation that has been learned during safety investigations. In Europe, the methodical approach to investigatory work and the implementation of recommendations brings some meaning to the loss experienced as a result of accidents. During 2017, Safety Investigation Authorities from 15 different States addressed 42 safety recommendations to EASA in the context of the Agency’s remit. This number is about the half of the safety recommendations received
Recommended publications
  • EGNOS Implementation Status
    EGNOS implementation status H2020 BlueGNSS Final meeting Katerina Strelcova, Aviation Market Development Innovation Officer, Project officer of H2020BlueGNSS project 18 July 2018 @ENAV, Rome Table of Content • GSA introduction • EGNOS implementation status • Airspace user capabilities • GSA support to foster EGNOS implementation 2 European GNSS Agency Mission: Resourcing: Gateway to Services • Galileo & EGNOS Operations and Service Provision 160 21 Staff Nationalities • Market Development of the applications and the receivers Gatekeeper of security • Security Accreditation Prague, Cz Rep – HQ St. Germain en Laye, FR – GSMC • Operation of Galileo Security Swanwick, UK – GSMC (tbc) Monitoring Centre, governmental Torrejon, ES – GSC Noordwijk, NL – GRC service (PRS) activities Toulouse, FR – EGNOS Brussels, BE – COMM 4 1. How GSA fits in the EU structure he GSA: governance summary Political Oversight Council and European Parliament Programme Management European GNSS Programme Committee EuropeanEuropean CommissionCommission Delegation Delegation and assistance European Space Agency Working Arrangement Administrative Board Security Accreditation Board Market Development Security GSMC operation GNSS exploitation European Satellite Navigation Programmes • Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) • Satellite Based Augmentation System (SBAS) • Worldwide coverage • Continental coverage • 22 Satellites constellation today • Increased accuracy and integrity over GPS • Full Operational Capability by 2020 • Next version will augment Galileo 5 EGNOS
    [Show full text]
  • Enne Ip 2018
    ENNE IP 2018 An opportunity to engage with European nursing students Welcome to Finland! ENNE IP 2018 will take place at Satakunta University of Applied Sciences, SAMK, in Pori campus on 22. – 28. April, 2018. The intensive programme is hosted by one of the 14 member institu- tions and enables students to develop their intercultural competencies around an understanding of: • the social determinants of health in different European countries • the impact of globalisation on health • policy-making processes and approaches to policy analysis and evaluation across different health and social care systems • different models of organisation and delivery of health and social care services • the principles of nursing care and the role of the nursing profes- sion within health and social care practices in different European countries. The programme is run using problem-based learning principles in which students work together in tutorial groups of seven to eight students per group mixed according to participating nationalities. A patient case scenario is used to enable students to share knowledge, practice and experiences in planning the care for the patient. Students are expected to prepare in advance a presentation about their own country; and discuss topics such as the general character- istics of their own health and social care system, nursing curriculum; and cultural characteristics (food, life style, family patterns, etc.). In addition there will be visits to health and social care providers; as well as social activities all designed to promote intercultural understanding. A detailed description of the programme; and what students are ex- pected to prepare prior to the start of the programme will be provided in advance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dolomites a Guided Walking Adventure
    ITALY The Dolomites A Guided Walking Adventure Table of Contents Daily Itinerary ........................................................................... 4 Tour Itinerary Overview .......................................................... 13 Tour Facts at a Glance ........................................................... 16 Traveling To and From Your Tour .......................................... 18 Information & Policies ............................................................ 23 Italy at a Glance ..................................................................... 25 Packing List ........................................................................... 30 800.464.9255 / countrywalkers.com 2 © 2017 Otago, LLC dba Country Walkers Travel Style This small-group Guided Walking Adventure offers an authentic travel experience, one that takes you away from the crowds and deep in to the fabric of local life. On it, you’ll enjoy 24/7 expert guides, premium accommodations, delicious meals, effortless transportation, and local wine or beer with dinner. Rest assured that every trip detail has been anticipated so you’re free to enjoy an adventure that exceeds your expectations. And, with our optional Flight + Tour Combo and Venice PostPost----TourTour Extension to complement this destination, we take care of all the travel to simplify the journey. Refer to the attached itinerary for more details. Overview Dramatic pinnacles of white rock, flower-filled meadows, fir forests, and picturesque villages are all part of the renowned Italian Dolomites, protected in national and regional parks and recently recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage site. The luminous limestone range is the result of geological transformation from ancient sea floor to mountaintop. The region is a landscape of grassy balconies perched above Alpine lakes, and Tyrolean hamlets nestled in lush valleys, crisscrossed by countless hiking and walking trails connecting villages, Alpine refuges, and cable cars. The Dolomites form the frontier between Germanic Northern Europe and the Latin South.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex A: List of 2018 Safety Recommendations Replies
    Annex list ANNUAL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS REVIEW 2018 Annex A: List of 2018 Safety Recommendations Replies ......................... 2 Annex B: Definitions ........................................................................... 192 Annex C: Safety Recommendations classification ............................... 196 Annex A List of 2018 Safety Recommendations Replies ANNUAL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS REVIEW 2018 1 | P a g e Australia Date of Event Registration Aircraft Type Location event Type VH-OQA AIRBUS Singapore Aerodrome 04/11/2010 Accident A380 144° M 33K Synopsis of the event: On 4 November 2010, while climbing through 7,000 ft after departing from Changi Airport, Singapore, the Airbus A380 registered VH-OQA, sustained an uncontained engine rotor failure (UERF) of the No. 2 engine, a Rolls-Royce Trent 900. Debris from the UERF impacted the aircraft, resulting in significant structural and systems damage. The flight crew managed the situation and, after completing the required actions for the multitude of system failures, safely returned to and landed at Changi Airport. Safety Recommendation ASTL-2013-039 (ATSB): The Australian Transport Safety Bureau recommends that the European Aviation Safety Agency, in cooperation with the US Federal Aviation Administration, review the damage sustained by Airbus A380-842, VH-OQA following the uncontained engine rotor failure overhead Batam Island, Indonesia, to incorporate any lessons learned from this accident into the advisory material. Reply No 2 sent on 26/06/2018: EASA is cooperating with the FAA to take into account the lessons learnt from this accident and other uncontained engine rotor failures in revisions of FAA AC 20-128A and EASA AMC 20-128A. An expansion of the compliance demonstration for small fragments is envisaged.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference List Safety Approach Light Masts
    REFERENCE LIST SAFETY APPROACH LIGHT MASTS Updated: 24 April 2014 1 (10) AFRICA Angola Menongue Airport 2013 Benin Cotonou Airport 2000 Burkina Faso Bobo Diaulasso Airport 1999 Cameroon Douala Airport 1994, 2009 Garoua Airport 2001 Cap Verde Praia Airport 1999 Amilcar Capral Airport 2008 Equatorial Guinea Mongomeyen Airport 2010 Gabon Libreville Airport 1994 M’vengue Airport 2003 Ghana Takoradi Airport 2008 Accra Kotoka 2013 Guinea-Bissau Bissau Airport 2012 Ivory Coast Abidjan Airport 2002 Yamoussoukro Airport 2006 Kenya Laikipia Air Base 2010 Kisumu Airport 2011 Libya Tripoli Airport 2002 Benghazi Airport 2005 Madagasgar Antananarivo Airport 1994 Mahajanga Airport 2009 Mali Moptu Airport 2002 Bamako Airport 2004, 2010 Mauritius Rodrigues Airport 2002 SSR Int’l Airport 2011 Mauritius SSR 2012 Mozambique Airport in Mozambique 2008 Namibia Walvis Bay Airport 2005 Lüderitz Airport 2005 Republic of Congo Ollombo Airport 2007 Pointe Noire Airport 2007 Exel Composites Plc www.exelcomposites.com Muovilaaksontie 2 Tel. +358 20 754 1200 FI-82110 Heinävaara, Finland Fax +358 20 754 1330 This information is confidential unless otherwise stated REFERENCE LIST SAFETY APPROACH LIGHT MASTS Updated: 24 April 2014 2 (10) Brazzaville Airport 2008, 2010, 2013 Rwanda Kigali-Kamombe International Airport 2004 South Africa Kruger Mpumalanga Airport 2002 King Shaka Airport, Durban 2009 Lanseria Int’l Airport 2013 St. Helena Airport 2013 Sudan Merowe Airport 2007 Tansania Dar Es Salaam Airport 2009 Tunisia Tunis–Carthage International Airport 2011 ASIA China
    [Show full text]
  • Strategisches Entwicklungskonzept Mit Business Plan ABD AIRPORT BOZEN - DOLOMITEN
    Strategisches Entwicklungskonzept mit Business Plan ABD AIRPORT BOZEN - DOLOMITEN ABSCHLUSSBERICHT V1.2 15. Oktober 2015 BOZEN AIRPORT INHALT Einführende Worte 0. Executive Summary I. Marktbeurteilung A. Tourismus B. Luftfahrt II. Strategie III. Verkehrsprognose IV. Technische Bewertung V. Geschäftsplan VI. Schlussfolgerungen und Empfehlungen VII. Anhang AIRPORT CONSULTING VIENNA © Alle Rechte vorbehalten - Streng vertraulich BOZEN AIRPORT HAFTUNGSAUSSCHLUSS Nutzungsbedingungen und Bestandsanalysen und ihre zeitliche Entwicklung, sowie Der Zugang und die Verwendung dieses Dokuments unterliegen diesbezügliche Stellungnahmen müssen als Vorhersagen oder allen anwendbaren Gesetzen und Vorschriften. Unbefugte Richtlinien für die Zukunft und zukünftige Resultate gewertet Kenntnisnahme wird als illegal betrachtet und gemäß geltender werden. Gesetze und Vorschriften geahndet. Beziehung zwischen der ACV und dem Kunden Garantien Alle Stellungnahmen der ACV müssen als an den Kunden und für ACV bedient sich im Rahmen ihrer Geschäftsaktivitäten stets der dessen alleinige Verwendung und Nutzung angesehen werden. Sie bestmöglichen Arbeitsstandards und bezieht sich auf diverse müssen, dem Vertrag zwischen ACV und dem Kunden Informationsquellen. ACV behandelt diese Informationen mit der entsprechend, als exklusiv auf die konkrete Aufgabenstellung, die größten Sorgfalt, um sicher zu gehen, dass sie vollständig und der ACV zugeteilt wurde, begrenzt, betrachtet werden. Der Kunde sinngemäß widergegeben werden. Trotzdem ist anzumerken, dass und seine Partner, Direktoren, Mitarbeiter, Stellvertreter oder der Inhalt dieses Dokuments keiner externen Verifizierung Berater müssen das vorliegende Dokument streng vertraulich unterzogen wurde. ACV übernimmt für sich, ihre Mitarbeiter oder handhaben und dürfen es nur für Zwecke, die - dem Verständnis ihre Vertreter keine Verantwortung, Haftung oder Verpflichtung der ACV und des Kunden entsprechend - für die Realisierung des hinsichtlich der Stellungnahmen, die im Rahmen dieser Projekts relevant sind, verwenden.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAVEL INFO CWC | Telecommunication Laboratory | University of Oulu | City of Oulu
    TRAVEL INFO CWC | Telecommunication Laboratory | University of Oulu | City of Oulu Travel information The City of Oulu is well served by air connections from Helsinki. Finnair has numerous daily flights between Oulu and Helsinki. The location of Oulu airport is 15 km south of the city centre and the hotels. There is a regular local bus service - route no. 19. An airport taxi has to be requested in advance from mobile phone +358-600- 30081. >> Transport connections to / from Oulu airport. You can also take a train from Helsinki to Oulu. The fastest train connection takes less than 6 hours. In order to get to the Helsinki railway station from the Helsinki airport, take bus number 615 or the Finnair bus. Reserve at least 35 minutes for the transfer. The University of Oulu (Linnanmaa) is located 6 km from the city centre. Buses no 4, 6, 7 and 19 take you directly from the city centre to the university in 15 minutes. There is a bus approximately every 10 minutes. To call a taxi from a mobile phone, dial +358-600-30081. From a fixed phone, dial 10041. Street Addresses Telecommunication Laboratory >> See the map University of Oulu Linnanmaa, Erkki Koiso-Kanttilan katu 3 90570 Oulu Centre for Wireless Communications >> See the map University of Oulu Linnanmaa, Erkki Koiso-Kanttilan katu, 2S-door 90570 Oulu Maps ● University of Oulu ❍ Linnanmaa campus area map 1, map 2 ❍ Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Tietotalo 1 floor plans ❍ Department of Information Processing Science, Tietotalo 2 ● City of Oulu map service ● Road Map
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Association Vi (Europe)
    WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION REGIONAL ASSOCIATION VI (EUROPE) THIRTEENTH SESSION GENEVA, 2–10 MAY 2002 ABRIDGED FINAL REPORT WITH RESOLUTIONS WMO-No. 942 Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization - Geneva - Switzerland REPORTS OF RECENT WMO SESSIONS Congress and Executive Council 883 — Executive Council. Fiftieth session, Geneva, 16–26 June 1998. 902 — Thirteenth World Meteorological Congress. Geneva, 4–26 May 1999. 903 — Executive Council. Fifty-first session, Geneva, 27–29 May 1999. 915 — Executive Council. Fifty-second session, Geneva, 16–26 May 2000. 929 — Executive Council. Fifty-third session, Geneva, 5–15 June 2001. 932 — Thirteenth World Meteorological Congress. Proceedings, Geneva, 4–26 May 1999. Regional associations 882 — Regional Association VI (Europe). Twelfth session, Tel Aviv, 18–27 May 1998. 890 — Regional Association V (South–West Pacific). Twelfth session, Denpasar, 14–22 September 1998. 891 — Regional Association I (Africa). Twelfth session, Arusha, 14–23 October 1998. 924 — Regional Association II (Asia). Twelfth session, Seoul, 19–27 September 2000. 927 — Regional Association IV (North and Central America). Thirteenth session, Maracay, 28 March–6 April 2001. 934 — Regional Association III (South America). Thirteenth session, Quito, 19–26 September 2001. Technical commissions 881 — Commission for Instruments and Methods of Observation. Twelfth session, Casablanca, 4–12 May 1998. 893 — Commission for Basic Systems. Extraordinary session, Karlsruhe, 30 September–9 October 1998. 899 — Commission for Aeronautical Meteorology. Eleventh session, Geneva, 2–11 March 1999. 900 — Commission for Agricultural Meteorology. Twelfth session, Accra, 18–26 February 1999. 921 — Commission for Hydrology. Eleventh session, Abuja, 6–16 November 2000. 923 — Commission for Basic Systems. Twelfth session, Geneva, 29 November–8 December 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • POWDERKEG" BALKAN THEATRE 1.0 User's Manual
    BALKAN THEATRE - USER'S MANUAL "POWDERKEG" BALKAN THEATRE 1.0 User's manual Ó Falcon 4 is Intellectual Property of Infogrames Inc. 1 rev. 10c 2 BALKAN THEATRE - USER'S MANUAL Table of contents Introduction..............................................................................................................................5 Producer’s Notes.....................................................................................................................6 Download Locations................................................................................................................9 System Requirements...........................................................................................................10 Installation Instructions ........................................................................................................11 Preparing for Installation ......................................................................................................11 Installing the theater files .....................................................................................................11 Theater Activation................................................................................................................12 Additional patches................................................................................................................13 Known Issues and Common Problems...............................................................................14 Balkan Theater Features .......................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • State Aid No SA. 36560 - Finland - Financing of Airport Infrastructure at Tampere-Pirkkala Airport T2 Sir
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, C (2013) 8448 final PUBLIC VERSION This document is made available for information purposes only. Subject: State aid No SA. 36560 - Finland - Financing of airport infrastructure at Tampere-Pirkkala airport T2 Sir, 1 PROCEDURE (1) By electronic notification dated 27 May 2013, Finland notified to the European Commission a measure concerning the airport infrastructure at Tampere-Pirkkala airport. The measure was registered under the state aid case number SA. 36560. (2) By letters of 23 July 2013 and 27 September 2013 the Commission requested additional clarifications by the Finnish authorities. These were provided on 26 July 2013 and 23 October 2013 respectively. 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE MEASURE 2.1 Tampere-Pirkkala airport (1) The airport is located in Pirkkala, 13 kilometres south-west of the City of Tampere in southern Finland. The airport is the third largest airport in Finland (measured in number of passengers, see tables 1 and 2). Besides the civil aviation, the airport also serves as a base for the Finnish Air Force. (2) The airport has two scheduled passenger terminals: – Terminal 1 was constructed in 1998 and is currently used by Finnair, Flybe, SAS, Blue1 and Air Baltic. – Terminal 2 (hereinafter also "T2") was initially used as a cargo hangar by DHL and (after it became vacant in 2002) converted into a low-cost terminal. T2 is currently used by Ryanair. However, it is open also to other potential users. 1 (3) The airport is owned and operated by Finavia Oyj1 (hereinafter "Finavia"). T2 is operated by Airpro Oy (hereinafter "Airpro")2, a subsidiary of Finavia.
    [Show full text]
  • Finavia Responsibility Report 2019
    RESPONSIBILITY AT FINAVIA A PART OF SOCIETY SAFETY PERSONNEL ENVIRONMENT GRI 2019 Responsibility report RESPONSIBILITY REPORT 2019 1 RESPONSIBILITY AT FINAVIA A PART OF SOCIETY SAFETY PERSONNEL ENVIRONMENT GRI Finavia in brief Finavia is an airport company which operates and develops 21 airports in different parts of Finland. We serve Finnish and international passengers and airlines. Our key mission is to ensure smooth travel from Finland to different parts of the world and back. By developing airports and smooth connections, we create jobs and support Finland’s international competitiveness. We bear our responsibility for the impact of our activities on people, the environment and society at large. Safety, security, sustainable development and connectivity are at the core of our responsibility. At Finavia, responsibility consists of details, and every single detail counts. RESPONSIBILITY REPORT 2019 2 Content RESPONSIBILITY AT FINAVIA ..................... 4 FINAVIA’S ENVIRONMENTAL WORK .... 43 Key events ........................................................................... 4 Finavia’s climate programme.....................................45 Responsibility at Finavia .................................................5 Goals and achievements of environmental Responsibility goals ..........................................................8 responsibility ...................................................................47 Stakeholder cooperation .............................................10 Environmental investments .......................................49
    [Show full text]
  • POLITECNICO DI TORINO Repository ISTITUZIONALE
    POLITECNICO DI TORINO Repository ISTITUZIONALE A DSS for business decisions in air transportation: a case study Original A DSS for business decisions in air transportation: a case study / Perboli G.; Ghirardi M.; Gobbato L.; Benedetti G.. - ELETTRONICO. - (2011), pp. 766-771. ((Intervento presentato al convegno Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA), 2011 11th International Conference on. Availability: This version is available at: 11583/2438778 since: Publisher: IEEE Published DOI:10.1109/ISDA.2011.6121749 Terms of use: openAccess This article is made available under terms and conditions as specified in the corresponding bibliographic description in the repository Publisher copyright ieee copyright 20xx IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating . (Article begins on next page) 04 August 2020 A DSS for business decisions in air transportation: a case study Guido Perboli, Marco Ghirardi, Luca Gobbato Gabriele Benedetti DAUIN BDS srl Politecnico di Torino Turin, Italy Turin, Italy [email protected] {[email protected], marco.ghirardi, luca.gobbato}@polito.it Abstract—The socio-economic development leads people to a in predicting aggregate flows between different cities [2]. great mobility. Thus the flights identification and management In this paper we introduce an efficient Logit formulation is becoming a key factor for the economic growth of the areas for modeling the competition between different airports and nearby the airports. The airport management is constantly looking for methods to improve its performance, both in forecasting the effects of the introduction of modifications terms of profitability and quality of service and the proper of the flight schedule in the system.
    [Show full text]