DOCSLIB.ORG

Trophic Aquaculture in Canada with and Without a Deposit Feeder Component

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Assessing the Profitability of Integrated Multi- Trophic Aquaculture in Canada With and Without a Deposit Feeder Component by Mark A. Carras B.B.A., Saint Francis Xavier University, 2009 Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Resource Management Report No. 671 in the School of Resource and Environmental Management Faculty of Environment Mark A. Carras 2017 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2017 Approval Name: Mark A. Carras Degree: Master of Resource Management Title: Assessing the Profitability of Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture in Canada With and Without a Deposit Feeder Component Report No. 671 Examining Committee: Chair: Matthew Bakker Master of Resource Management candidate Duncan Knowler Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Christopher Pearce Supervisor Research Scientist Pacific Biological Station Fisheries and Oceans Canada Date Defended/Approved: July 11, 2017 ii Abstract Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) has been proposed as a sustainable aquaculture technology that can help offset some of the environmental impacts of fed finfish aquaculture. My study builds on a previous financial analysis of salmon monoculture and IMTA in Canada by using a discounted cash-flow analysis (DCF) to examine the financial implications for investors considering investing in either (i) Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) monoculture, (ii) Atlantic salmon, blue mussel (Mytilus edulis), and kelp (Saccharina latissima) three-species IMTA, or (iii) Atlantic salmon, blue mussel, kelp, and green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) four-species IMTA. I found that three-species IMTA is more profitable than both Atlantic salmon monoculture and four-species IMTA, but that four-species IMTA has a lower net present value (NPV) than salmon monoculture if there is no price premium applied to IMTA salmon and mussels. Including a 10% price premium on IMTA salmon and mussels results in substantially higher NPVs for three-species and four-species IMTA compared to salmon monoculture. However, despite the positive indications of my study’s DCF and other IMTA-related financial analyses, ongoing uncertainty related to IMTA’s financial and environmental performance, and technological and managerial complexity, may be overriding barriers to IMTA adoption in Canada. Keywords: Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture; green sea urchin; echinoculture; investment appraisal; financial; monoculture iii Dedication This is for Nicholas Carras, a good man who always picked me up. iv Acknowledgements I want to thank my senior supervisor, Dr. Duncan Knowler, and my supervisor, Dr. Christopher Pearce, for their patience and understanding throughout this project. I could not have done this without their support and guidance. Thank you to also to Simon Fraser University and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada for their financial support. In no particular order, I want to thank Hossein Ayouqi, Adrian Hamer, Michael Wowchuk, Drs. Thierry Chopin, Shawn Robinson, Gregor Reid, Neil Ridler, and Stephen Cross, and the extended Canadian Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture Network for their support. On the industry side, thanks to Brian Tsuyoshi (Urchinomics), Ashley Roulston (Industrial Plankton ™), and Ted Weaire, Michael Szemerda, and Steve Smith of Cooke Aquaculture for their contributions to the real-world industry data used to inform this study’s financial analysis. Thanks also to Matthew Bakker for chairing my defence, to my classmates, and to the staff and faculty of Simon Fraser University’s School of Resource and Environmental Management. I want to thank my partner, Marine Chéné, for her love and support throughout my graduate studies. Thank you to my parents, sisters, brother, aunts, uncles, cousins, nephews, and the whole French contingent who helped get me to where I am today. Also, a big thanks to my many wonderful friends and colleagues. You know who you are, and there are too many to name. Finally, I want to thank Apollo for guiding my eardrums. v Table of Contents Approval ............................................................................................................................. ii Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iii Dedication .......................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgements ..............................................................................................................v Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ................................................................................................................... viii List of Figures .................................................................................................................... ix List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................x Chapter 1. Introduction & Literature Review .............................................................1 1.1. Problem Statement ......................................................................................................1 1.2. Literature Review........................................................................................................2 1.2.1. The Case for Sustainable Aquaculture ...........................................................2 1.2.2. Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) .............................................6 1.2.3. Financial and Economic Analysis of Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) .....................................................................................8 1.2.3.1. Market Analysis ....................................................................................................... 8 1.2.3.2. Socio-Economic Impacts of IMTA ........................................................................ 10 1.2.3.3. Economic and Financial Impacts of IMTA ........................................................... 10 1.3. Research Questions ...................................................................................................12 1.4. Study Approach ........................................................................................................13 1.5. Organization of the Study .........................................................................................14 Chapter 2. Comparing a Monoculture Salmon Farm and a Three-species IMTA Farm: a Discounted Cash-Flow Analysis of East Coast Canadian Aquaculture Operations ..........................................................15 2.1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................15 2.2. Background ...............................................................................................................17 2.3. Materials and Methods ..............................................................................................18 2.3.1. Technical and Biological Assumptions .......................................................21 2.3.2. Economic and Financial Assumptions .........................................................23 2.3.3. Investment Appraisal and Sensitivity Analyses ...........................................32 2.4. Results .......................................................................................................................34 2.5. Discussion .................................................................................................................36 2.6. Conclusions ...............................................................................................................41 Chapter 3. Three-species Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) vs. Four-species IMTA: a Comparative Financial Analysis ..................43 3.1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................43 3.2. Background ...............................................................................................................44 vi 3.2.1. Benthic Species in IMTA .............................................................................44 3.2.2. Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis in aquaculture ......................................46 3.3. Materials and Methods ..............................................................................................47 3.3.1. Technical and Biological Assumptions .......................................................49 3.3.1.1. Green Sea Urchin Hatchery Production ................................................................. 52 3.3.1.2. Green Sea Urchin Grow-out .................................................................................. 54 3.3.1.3. Green Sea Urchin Finishing Diet ........................................................................... 55 3.3.2. Economic and Financial Assumptions .........................................................56 3.3.2.1 Investment Appraisal and Sensitivity Analyses .................................................. 67 3.4. Results .......................................................................................................................69 3.5. Discussion .................................................................................................................76
Recommended publications
  • Overview of the Marine Fish Hatchery Industry in Taiwan

    Overview of the Marine Fish Hatchery Industry in Taiwan

    Overview of the marine fish hatchery industry in Taiwan. Item Type Journal Contribution Authors Nocillado, Josephine N.; Liao, I Chiu Download date 01/10/2021 00:41:13 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/8923 Overview of the marine fish hatchery industry in Taiwan Josephine N. Nocilladoand I Chiu Liao Taiwan Fisheries Research Institute 199 Hou-Ih Road, Keelung 202 Taiwan T y p i c al broodstock ponds (right) in Taiwan. Striped threadfm broodstock are held in the pond on the lower right. At left is formulated broodstock diet During the Lunar New Year, the grandest of all holidays in Tai­ wan, images of fish are prominently displayed everywhere. Among the Taiwanese, fish is considered auspicious and a sym­ bol of bounty. This is because the pronunciation of “fish” (yü) is similar to that of “surplus” (yü), indicating abundance and pros­ perity. A fish specialty, with the fish preferably presented in its entirety, is a constant fare on the dining table during special occa­ sions. And in the true Taiwanese tradition, this most special dish is served as the last course, something truly worth waiting for, and remembered. It was in the 1960s that the first successes on artificial propa­ Not surprisingly, fish culture is itself an age-old traditiongation in were achieved, this time in several species of Chinese carps Taiwan. Rearing fish in captivity is almost an art form for manyand other tilapias. Art and science combined, fish propagation in Taiwanese aquafarmers who inherited the skill from many ofTaiwan their took off to a great start.
  • Cobia Database Articles Final Revision 2.0, 2-1-2017

    Cobia Database Articles Final Revision 2.0, 2-1-2017

    Revision 2.0 (2/1/2017) University of Miami Article TITLE DESCRIPTION AUTHORS SOURCE YEAR TOPICS Number Habitat 1 Gasterosteus canadus Linné [Latin] [No Abstract Available - First known description of cobia morphology in Carolina habitat by D. Garden.] Linnaeus, C. Systema Naturæ, ed. 12, vol. 1, 491 1766 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) Ichthyologie, vol. 10, Iconibus ex 2 Scomber niger Bloch [No Abstract Available - Description and alternative nomenclature of cobia.] Bloch, M. E. 1793 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) illustratum. Berlin. p . 48 The Fisheries and Fishery Industries of the Under this head was to be carried on the study of the useful aquatic animals and plants of the country, as well as of seals, whales, tmtles, fishes, lobsters, crabs, oysters, clams, etc., sponges, and marine plants aml inorganic products of U.S. Commission on Fisheries, Washington, 3 United States. Section 1: Natural history of Goode, G.B. 1884 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) the sea with reference to (A) geographical distribution, (B) size, (C) abundance, (D) migrations and movements, (E) food and rate of growth, (F) mode of reproduction, (G) economic value and uses. D.C., 895 p. useful aquatic animals Notes on the occurrence of a young crab- Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 4 eater (Elecate canada), from the lower [No Abstract Available - A description of cobia in the lower Hudson Eiver.] Fisher, A.K. 1891 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) 13, 195 Hudson Valley, New York The nomenclature of Rachicentron or Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum Habitat 5 Elacate, a genus of acanthopterygian The universally accepted name Elucate must unfortunately be supplanted by one entirely unknown to fame, overlooked by all naturalists, and found in no nomenclator.
  • Cobia and Pompano Handbook

    Cobia and Pompano Handbook

    CMFRI Booklet Series No. 19/2019 2019 CMFRI Booklet Series No. 19/2019 \\_Ii--/}// \<�\\:I,. t.;w1 Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute !1�= Practical Hand Book on CMFR Seed Production of Cobia and Silver Pompano Prepared by Dr.A.K.AbdulNazar Dr. R. layakumar Dr. G. Tamilmani Dr. M. Sakthivel Dr. P. Ramesh Kumar Dr.K.K.Anikuttan M.Sankar Mandapam Regional Centre of CMFRI Mandapam Camp - 623 520 Tamil Nadu, India 2019 © 2019 ICAR –Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute CMFRI Booklet Series No. 19/2019 Published by Dr. A. Gopalakrishnan Director !CAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Kochi - 682 018 Typeset and Printed by Rehana Offset Printers, Srivilliputtur - 626 125 Phone : 04563-260383, E-mail : [email protected] PREFACE Mariculture – the farming and husbandry of marine plants and animals of commercial importance, is an untapped sector of sea food production in India. Mariculture has been contributing substantially to the global fish production in recent years. It accounted for about 29.2 per cent of world aquaculture production by value. It is a fact that India is still in infancy in mariculture production in the global scenario. Since mariculture is the only hope for increasing seafood production in the coming years, the research and development in this sector is of paramount importance. In fact, such thrust was not given in India and hence, it was felt necessary to develop viable seed production and farming technologies to develop mariculture. The R&D efforts in this direction yielded commendable results within a few years and Mandapam Regional Centre of ICAR CMFRI succeeded in captive breeding and seed production of two high value marine fishes namely, Cobia, Rachycentron canadum and Silver pompano, Trachinotus blochii for the first time in the country.
  • (DNR) – Fisheries Division Fish Hatcheries Performance – Fiscal Year 2019

    (DNR) – Fisheries Division Fish Hatcheries Performance – Fiscal Year 2019

    Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) – Fisheries Division Fish Hatcheries Performance – Fiscal Year 2019 The DNR Fisheries Division Fish Production Section (FPS) maintains and operates six extensive, cold water fish hatcheries, three of which also produce cool water species (Table 1). There are also several ancillary programs managed by FPS to provide the support necessary to run a quality fish stocking program. Those include Fish Health and Quality, Fish Stocking, Fish Marking, and Electronics. Table 1. Location of and species reared by Michigan DNR Fish Hatcheries Hatchery Name Location Species Reared Steelhead, Chinook Salmon, Wolf Lake State Fish Hatchery Mattawan (Van Buren County) Muskellunge, Walleye Rainbow Trout, Brown Trout, Harrietta State Fish Hatchery Harrietta (Wexford County) Atlantic Salmon Coho Salmon, Chinook Salmon, Platte River State Fish Hatchery Honor (Benzie County) Atlantic Salmon, Walleye Rainbow Trout, Brown Trout, Oden State Fish Hatchery Alanson (Emmet County) Arctic Grayling Steelhead, Chinook Salmon, Thompson State Fish Hatchery Thompson (Schoolcraft County) Walleye Brook Trout, Lake Trout, Splake Marquette State Fish Hatchery Marquette (Marquette County) (Hybrid) Recreational fishing in Michigan is a significant economic driver, estimated at $2.3 billion. Fish stocking is one of the few tools available for fisheries professionals to use in managing the state’s world-class fisheries. Fish are stocked for three primary reasons: • Provide diverse fishing opportunities (e.g. walleye, steelhead) • Maintain ecosystem balance (e.g. Chinook salmon) • Rehabilitate depressed fish populations (e.g. lake sturgeon) The following summarizes the performance of the six DNR fish production facilities in five areas of focus during fiscal year 2019. Broodstock Management Broodstock management includes rearing and maintenance of captive brood populations at Oden Hatchery and Marquette Hatchery, as well as collecting gametes from feral stock.
  • Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus Dofleini) Care Manual

    Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus Dofleini) Care Manual

    Giant Pacific Octopus Insert Photo within this space (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual CREATED BY AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxonomic Advisory Group IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA Animal Welfare Committee Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxon Advisory Group (AITAG) (2014). Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual. Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Silver Spring, MD. Original Completion Date: September 2014 Dedication: This work is dedicated to the memory of Roland C. Anderson, who passed away suddenly before its completion. No one person is more responsible for advancing and elevating the state of husbandry of this species, and we hope his lifelong body of work will inspire the next generation of aquarists towards the same ideals. Authors and Significant Contributors: Barrett L. Christie, The Dallas Zoo and Children’s Aquarium at Fair Park, AITAG Steering Committee Alan Peters, Smithsonian Institution, National Zoological Park, AITAG Steering Committee Gregory J. Barord, City University of New York, AITAG Advisor Mark J. Rehling, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo Roland C. Anderson, PhD Reviewers: Mike Brittsan, Columbus Zoo and Aquarium Paula Carlson, Dallas World Aquarium Marie Collins, Sea Life Aquarium Carlsbad David DeNardo, New York Aquarium Joshua Frey Sr., Downtown Aquarium Houston Jay Hemdal, Toledo
  • Marine Aquaculture Development in Egypt

    Marine Aquaculture Development in Egypt

    MEGAPESCA Rua Gago Coutinho 11 Valado de Santa Quitéria 2460 – 207 Alfeizerão Portugal Telephone: (+351) 262 990 372 Fax: (+351) 262 990 496 EMAIL: [email protected] Website: http://www.megapesca.com MARINE AQUACULTURE IN EGYPT CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1 2 PRODUCTION AND MARKETING OF FISH IN EGYPT......................................................2 2.1 FISH PRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................2 2.2 INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN FISHERY PRODUCTS .........................................................................5 2.3 FISH SUPPLIES TO MARKET AND CONSUMPTION .........................................................................5 2.4 CONTRIBUTION OF AQUACULTURE TO FISH CONSUMPTION........................................................6 2.5 PRICES OF FISH PRODUCTS FROM AQUACULTURE ......................................................................8 2.5.1 Seabass and seabream......................................................................................................9 3 OVERVIEW OF SECTOR DEVELOPMENTS SINCE 1996 .................................................13 3.1 PRODUCTION OF MARINE SPECIES............................................................................................13 3.1.1 North Sinai......................................................................................................................13
  • Alaska Salmon Hatcheries Jessica Eller

    Alaska Salmon Hatcheries Jessica Eller

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Graduate School Professional Papers 2018 Policy Analysis: Alaska Salmon Hatcheries Jessica Eller Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Recommended Citation Eller, Jessica, "Policy Analysis: Alaska Salmon Hatcheries" (2018). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 11231. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/11231 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLICY ANALYSIS: ALASKA SALMON HATCHERIES BY JESSICA JEAN ELLER Bachelor of Arts, University of Alaska Southeast, Juneau, Alaska, 2011 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Studies The University of Montana Missoula, MT Spring 2018 Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Len Broberg, Chair Environmental Studies Shawn Johnson Center for Natural Resources and Environmental Policy Shoren Brown Environmental Studies Eller, Jessica, Master of Science, Spring 2018 Environmental Studies POLICY ANALYSIS: ALASKA SALMON HATCHERIES Chairperson: Len Broberg Using an adapted Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) - Evaluation, this study analyzes policy regulating Alaska salmon hatcheries to evaluate its effectiveness at sustaining wild salmon runs. When Alaska became a state in 1959, its salmon industry was suffering from years of overfishing.
  • FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations

    FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations

    FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations .........................................................................................3 Region 1 Reports: Northwest Montana ..........................................................................................................5 Region 2 Reports: West Central Montana .....................................................................................................17 Region 3 Reports: Southwest Montana ........................................................................................................34 Region 4 Reports: North Central Montana ...................................................................................................44 Region 5 Reports: South Central Montana ...................................................................................................65 Region 6 Reports: Northeast Montana ........................................................................................................73 Region 7 Reports: Southeast Montana .........................................................................................................86 Montana Fish Hatchery Reports: .......................................................................................................................92 Murray Springs Trout Hatchery ...................................................................................................................92 Washoe Park Trout Hatchery .......................................................................................................................93
  • A Review of Hatchery Reform Science in Washington State

    A Review of Hatchery Reform Science in Washington State

    A review of hatchery reform science in Washington State Joseph H. Anderson, Kenneth I. Warheit, Bethany E. Craig, Todd R. Seamons and Alf H. Haukenes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Final report to the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission January 23 2020 Table of Contents ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 10 BENEFITS OF HATCHERIES ............................................................................................................. 13 Harvest benefits ........................................................................................................................ 13 Economic benefits ................................................................................................................. 14 Social and cultural benefits ................................................................................................... 15 Treaty rights and tribal values ............................................................................................... 17 Mitigation .............................................................................................................................. 18 Conservation benefits ............................................................................................................... 19 Population conservation ......................................................................................................
  • A Review of Cage Aquaculture: Asia (Excluding China)

    A Review of Cage Aquaculture: Asia (Excluding China)

    18 Cage aquaculture production 2005 Data were taken from fisheries statistics submitted to FAO by the member countries for 2005. In case 2005 data were not available, 2004 data were used. Map background image Blue Marble: Next generation courtesy of NASA’s Earth Observatory 19 A review of cage aquaculture: Asia (excluding China) 21 A review of cage aquaculture: Asia (excluding China) Sena S. De Silva1 and Michael J. Phillips1 De Silva, S.S. and Phillips, M.J. A review of cage aquaculture: Asia (excluding China). In M. Halwart, D. Soto and J.R. Arthur (eds). Cage aquaculture – Regional reviews and global overview, pp. 18–48. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 498. Rome, FAO. 2007. 241 pp. ABSTRACT Cage farming in Asia is practiced in fresh, brackish and inshore coastal waters. Freshwater cage farming is a very old tradition that is thought to have originated in some of the Mekong Basin countries. It currently occurs in all freshwater habitats and is extremely diverse in nature, varying in cage design, intensity of practice, husbandry methods and the species farmed. In general, freshwater cage farming is practiced on a small scale, but in some instances clustering of cage operations can contribute a significant level of production, as in the case of pangasiid catfish culture in the Mekong Delta and the combination of common carp (Cyprinus carpio carpio) and tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) farming in some Indonesian reservoirs. Overall, although clear-cut statistics are not available, cage farming is thought to be the most predominant form of freshwater aquaculture in Asia. In this paper, freshwater cage farming is only briefly considered; it has recently been reviewed by the authors (see Phillips and De Silva, 2006).
  • Fish Hatchery Production Plan

    Fish Hatchery Production Plan

    revised fish hatchery production plan final environmental assessment NOTE: In May 2006, the Mitigation Commission revised this 1998 Plan Revision to make minor changes to two cold-water hatcheries included herein: Whiterocks State Fish Hatchery and Jones Hole National Fish Hatchery. Project production levels and funding at all other facilities included in this 1998 Plan remain unchanged. The 2006 revision is located at the end of this 1998 Plan. U.s. fish and wildlife service utah reclamation mitigation and conservation commission february 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 PURPOSE, NEED AND ISSUES Introduction .............................................................1-1 Background .............................................................1-1 Purpose and Need ........................................................1-2 Proposed Action ..........................................................1-9 Issue Identification........................................................1-12 CHAPTER 2 proposed action and ALTERNATIVES Introduction .............................................................2-1 No Action Alternative.....................................................2-1 Proposed Action Alternative ................................................2-2 Maximum Capacity Alternative..............................................2-4 Alternatives Considered But Eliminated.......................................2-4 CHAPTER 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Analysis................................................................3-1 Purpose and Need ........................................................3-7
  • “Pompano Farms – 2004”

    “Pompano Farms – 2004”

    “POMPANO FARMS – 2004” M.F. McMaster, T.C. Kloth, J.F. Coburn Mariculture Technologies International, Inc. Oak Hill, FL Background: The authors of this article are the principals of a Florida Corporation named Mariculture Technologies International, Inc. (MTI). This group was the first to farm the Florida Pompano (Trachinotus carolinus) starting in 1971. Developing technical skills and advancing understanding of this and other marine species has been an ongoing lifetime project. At present, MTI operates a new ten acre mariculture site in Oak Hill, Florida. Starting in 2002 the company consolidated its various operations and interests to this new location. Currently these include live and frozen brine shrimp (Artemia salina), farmed pompano targeted at the live seafood market, and farmed pigfish (Orthopristis chrysoptera) for the live marine baitfish market. In 2003 the authors presented a technical paper at Aquaculture America in Louisville, Kentucky titled “Prospects for Commercial Pompano Mariculture-2003”. An on-line copy of the complete paper can be found at www.PompanoFarms.com. Pompano Farms and Northeast Brine Shrimp are both registered DBA’s of Mariculture Technologies International, Inc.. In addition to those sites, the MTI corporate site is at www.Mariculturetechnology.com. Two major points were made in the WAS-Kentucky paper. First, the technology for the monthly production of pompano eggs, hatchery fry and adult fish is well known and practiced (by MTI). McMaster and Kloth designed and operated a commercial pompano farm in the Dominican Republic as well as a pompano broodstock and hatchery facility in Plantation Key, Florida. The commercial farm was a complete entity with broodstock, hatchery and grow-out (concrete tanks) facilities.