DOCSLIB.ORG

Hatchery Doc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SAVING A SYSTEM IN PERIL A SPECIAL REPORT ON THE NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY SYSTEM BY THE SPORT FISHING AND BOATING PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 2000 A note about the cover: The 20 squares on the front depict the 20 recommendations contained in the report, while the intersecting circles, with the fish at the nexus, represent the consensus reached by the wide variety of stakeholders involved in the project. CONTENTS Sport Fishing and Boating Partnership Council 1 SFBPC Members 2 SFBPC National Fish Hatchery Project Steering Committee 3 Membership and Representation Executive Summary 6 Introduction 10 Evaluation 12 Roles, Responsibilities, and Operation of the National Fish Hatchery System 14 Recommendations 15 Summary 25 National Fish Hatchery System Map 27–28 Attachments 1–7 29–51 S A VING A SYSTEM IN PERIL THE SPORT FISHING AND BOATING PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL (SFBPC) serves as a unique adviser to the Secretary of the Interior and the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The Council, formed in January 1993, represents the interests of the public and private sectors of the sport fishing and boating communities and is organized to enhance partnerships among industry, constituency groups and government. The Council is chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Its membership of up to 18 people includes the director of the Fish and Wildlife Service and the president of the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, who both serve in ex officio capacities. Other Council members are directors from state agencies responsible for managing recreational fish and wildlife resources and individuals who represent the interests of saltwater and freshwater recreational fishing, recreational boating, the recreational fishing and boating industries, recreational fisheries resources conservation, aquatic resource outreach and education, and tourism. More information about the SFBPC can be found on the Internet at http://sfbpc.fws.gov or by contacting the Council’s offices at 703/358 1711. 1 SPORT FISHING AND BOATING PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL SPORT FISHING AND BOATING PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL (SFBPC) MEMBERS COUNCIL CHAIR Barbara Knuth Helen Sevier Associate Professor Chief Executive Officer Natural Resource Policy and Management Bass Anglers Sportsman Society Cornell University (B.A.S.S. Inc.) Ryck Lydecker Associate Director for State Affairs James Anderson BOAT/U.S. Executive Director Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission Robert McDowell Director Tom Bedell New Jersey Division of Fish, Game Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Wildlife Pure Fishing Alfred Russo Jamie Clark (ex officio) Business Unit Manager/Director Director Stren Fishing Lines Division U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Remington Arms Co. Inc. Doug Hansen Eddie Smith Director Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Division of Wildlife Grady-White Boats Inc. South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks William Taylor Vice Provost and Dean Paul Hansen Michigan State University Executive Director College of Agriculture and Izaak Walton League of America Natural Resources Charles Harter III David Waller (ex officio) Board of Directors President Coastal Conservation Association International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies Mike Hough President Director States Organization for Boating Access Wildlife Resources Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources Jim Kalkofen Executive Director Carl Wilgus Professional Walleye Trail Administrator Division of Tourism Idaho Department of Commerce S A VING A SYSTEM IN PERIL 2 SFBPC NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP AND REPRESENTATION The National Fish Hatchery Project Steering Committee was assembled by the Technical Working Group of the Sport Fishing and Boating Partnership Council in the latter months of 1999 and the early months of 2000. Each person on the steering committee served in his capacity as an individual fisheries professional. It is important to note that these individuals have served the fisheries community for a number of years and have represented many fisheries interest groups during their careers. Their breadth and depth of knowledge of a diverse array of fisheries management issues and constituents’ perspectives were extremely beneficial to this project. The following list contains the name of each steering committee participant, accompanied by the name of the participant’s employer or the interest group with which the participant is affiliated. The listing of these organizations does not imply endorsement of this report by these groups. Rather, these organiza- tions are listed to provide context for the report by illustrating the diversity of experience and philosophies that came into play during the report’s creation. It should be noted that the organizations on this list recognized the importance of this report by essentially donating the time each steering committee member invested in this process. 3 SPORT FISHING AND BOATING PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL SFBPC NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS STEERING COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN Mark Hudy Norville Prosser National Fisheries Program Leader Vice President U.S. Forest Service American Sportfishing Association Phil Hulbert Robert Behnke Superintendent of Fish Culture Professor Division of Fish, Wildlife and Colorado State University (retired) Marine Resources Scientific Adviser New York State Department of Trout Unlimited Environmental Conservation Arthur Blazer John Kimball President Director Native American Fish and Division of Wildlife Resources Wildlife Society Utah State Department of Natural Resources Jesse Chappell Representative Past President International Association of Fish National Aquaculture Association and Wildlife Agencies Doug Dompier William Knapp Senior Tribal Policy Analyst Deputy Assistant Director Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fisheries and Habitat Conservation Fish Commission U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Richard M. “Mike” Gennings Robin Knox Chief President Fisheries Management Fisheries Administrators Section Wildlife Resources Division American Fisheries Society Georgia Department of Natural Resources Ron Lukens Assistant Director Delano Graff Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission Director Bureau of Fisheries Jim Martin Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission Conservation Director Pure Fishing Reginal Harrell Past President Joe McGurrin American Fisheries Society Director of Resources Fish Culture Section Trout Unlimited S A VING A SYSTEM IN PERIL 4 Gary Myers Robert Wiley Executive Director Section Manager Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Fisheries Management Representative Wyoming Game and Fish Department International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY PROJECT MANAGER Jim Range Noreen Clough Representative President American Fly Fishing Trade Association NKC Environmental Consulting Inc. Bruce Shupp STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING FACILITATORS National Conservation Director Barb Springer Beck Bass Anglers Sportsman Society President (B.A.S.S. Inc.) Beck Consulting Stephen Smith John Mundinger National Marine Fisheries Service (retired) Proprietor Bruce Suzumoto Consulting for Creative Solutions Manager SPORT FISHING AND BOATING PARTNERSHIP Special Projects COUNCIL COORDINATOR Northwest Power Planning Council Laury Parramore Whitney Tilt Director of Conservation National Fish and Wildlife Foundation 5 SPORT FISHING AND BOATING PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY “Forty million anglers will be watching to see For more than a century, the National Fish Hatchery System (NFHS) has played a valuable role in providing cultured fish to benefit Americans. if Congress and the The Department of the Interior’s U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) U.S. Fish and Wildlife manages the system, consisting of 66 national fish hatcheries, seven fish Service will respond technology centers, and nine fish health centers. to these consensus Unfortunately, the NFHS has serious problems that have developed over several recommendations.” decades. Funding for hatchery operations and maintenance has declined by —JIM MARTIN, CONSERVATION DIRECTOR, PURE FISHING about 15 percent since 1992. NFHS facilities are old and outmoded. As a whole, the system suffers from a maintenance backlog of approximately $300 million. Twenty-five percent of hatchery personnel positions are vacant. To a troubling degree, these problems reflect an erosion of congressional and public support. In March 1999, U.S. Representative George Miller, of the House Committee on Resources, asked the General Accounting Office (GAO) to conduct a review to evaluate the NFHS and to gauge the need for changes to refine and clarify the system’s legal mandates. In May 1999, 10 members of Congress requested that the FWS begin a process to determine the role and mission of the NFHS. In August 1999, the FWS asked the federally chartered Sport Fishing and Boating Partnership Council (SFBPC) to undertake that review. Following the FWS request, the SFBPC convened a special National Fish Hatchery Project Steering Committee to review the NFHS and develop recommendations regarding the system’s roles, responsibilities and strategic funding policies. Overall, the steering committee believes the NFHS is uniquely positioned to influence and benefit state and tribal fishery programs, fulfill tribal trust responsibilities, and provide technical assistance to private aquaculture. Although the intent of the steering committee’s report is to provide recom- mendations for future management of the NFHS, the steering committee con- cluded
Recommended publications
  • Overview of the Marine Fish Hatchery Industry in Taiwan

    Overview of the Marine Fish Hatchery Industry in Taiwan

    Overview of the marine fish hatchery industry in Taiwan. Item Type Journal Contribution Authors Nocillado, Josephine N.; Liao, I Chiu Download date 01/10/2021 00:41:13 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/8923 Overview of the marine fish hatchery industry in Taiwan Josephine N. Nocilladoand I Chiu Liao Taiwan Fisheries Research Institute 199 Hou-Ih Road, Keelung 202 Taiwan T y p i c al broodstock ponds (right) in Taiwan. Striped threadfm broodstock are held in the pond on the lower right. At left is formulated broodstock diet During the Lunar New Year, the grandest of all holidays in Tai­ wan, images of fish are prominently displayed everywhere. Among the Taiwanese, fish is considered auspicious and a sym­ bol of bounty. This is because the pronunciation of “fish” (yü) is similar to that of “surplus” (yü), indicating abundance and pros­ perity. A fish specialty, with the fish preferably presented in its entirety, is a constant fare on the dining table during special occa­ sions. And in the true Taiwanese tradition, this most special dish is served as the last course, something truly worth waiting for, and remembered. It was in the 1960s that the first successes on artificial propa­ Not surprisingly, fish culture is itself an age-old traditiongation in were achieved, this time in several species of Chinese carps Taiwan. Rearing fish in captivity is almost an art form for manyand other tilapias. Art and science combined, fish propagation in Taiwanese aquafarmers who inherited the skill from many ofTaiwan their took off to a great start.
  • Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011

    Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011

    SGR 129 Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – APRIL 2011 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY AND APPLIED NUTRITION OFFICE OF FOOD SAFETY Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Fourth Edition – April 2011 Additional copies may be purchased from: Florida Sea Grant IFAS - Extension Bookstore University of Florida P.O. Box 110011 Gainesville, FL 32611-0011 (800) 226-1764 Or www.ifasbooks.com Or you may download a copy from: http://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances You may submit electronic or written comments regarding this guidance at any time. Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations. gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number listed in the notice of availability that publishes in the Federal Register. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (240) 402-2300 April 2011 Table of Contents: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance • Guidance for the Industry: Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance ................................ 1 • CHAPTER 1: General Information .......................................................................................................19 • CHAPTER 2: Conducting a Hazard Analysis and Developing a HACCP Plan
  • Cobia Database Articles Final Revision 2.0, 2-1-2017

    Cobia Database Articles Final Revision 2.0, 2-1-2017

    Revision 2.0 (2/1/2017) University of Miami Article TITLE DESCRIPTION AUTHORS SOURCE YEAR TOPICS Number Habitat 1 Gasterosteus canadus Linné [Latin] [No Abstract Available - First known description of cobia morphology in Carolina habitat by D. Garden.] Linnaeus, C. Systema Naturæ, ed. 12, vol. 1, 491 1766 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) Ichthyologie, vol. 10, Iconibus ex 2 Scomber niger Bloch [No Abstract Available - Description and alternative nomenclature of cobia.] Bloch, M. E. 1793 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) illustratum. Berlin. p . 48 The Fisheries and Fishery Industries of the Under this head was to be carried on the study of the useful aquatic animals and plants of the country, as well as of seals, whales, tmtles, fishes, lobsters, crabs, oysters, clams, etc., sponges, and marine plants aml inorganic products of U.S. Commission on Fisheries, Washington, 3 United States. Section 1: Natural history of Goode, G.B. 1884 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) the sea with reference to (A) geographical distribution, (B) size, (C) abundance, (D) migrations and movements, (E) food and rate of growth, (F) mode of reproduction, (G) economic value and uses. D.C., 895 p. useful aquatic animals Notes on the occurrence of a young crab- Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 4 eater (Elecate canada), from the lower [No Abstract Available - A description of cobia in the lower Hudson Eiver.] Fisher, A.K. 1891 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) 13, 195 Hudson Valley, New York The nomenclature of Rachicentron or Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum Habitat 5 Elacate, a genus of acanthopterygian The universally accepted name Elucate must unfortunately be supplanted by one entirely unknown to fame, overlooked by all naturalists, and found in no nomenclator.
  • Fishery Basics – Seafood Markets Types of Fishery Products

    Fishery Basics – Seafood Markets Types of Fishery Products

    Fishery Basics – Seafood Markets Types of Fishery Products Fish products are highly traded and valuable commodities around the world. Seafood products are high in unsaturated fats and contain many proteins and other compounds that enhance good health. Fisheries products can be sold as live, fresh, frozen, preserved, or processed. There are a variety of methods to preserve fishery products, such as fermenting (e.g., fish pastes), drying, smoking (e.g., smoked Salmon), salting, or pickling (e.g., pickled Herring) to name a few. Fish for human consumption can be sold in its entirety or in parts, like filets found in grocery stores. The vast majority of fishery products produced in the world are intended for human consumption. During 2008, 115 million t (253 billion lbs) of the world fish production was marketed and sold for human consumption. The remaining 27 million t (59 billion lbs) of fishery production from 2008 was utilized for non-food purposes. For example, 20.8 million t (45 billion lbs) was used for reduction purposes, creating fishmeal and fish oil to feed livestock or to be used as feed in aquaculture operations. The remainder was used for ornamental and cultural purposes as well as live bait and pharmaceutical uses. Similar to the advancement of fishing gear and navigation technology (See Fishing Gear), there have been many advances in the seafood-processing sector over the years. Prior to these developments, most seafood was only available in areas close to coastal towns. The modern canning process originated in France in the early 1800s. Cold storage and freezing plants, to store excess harvests of seafood, were created as early as 1892.
  • An Overview of the Cuban Commercial Fishing Industry and Implications to the Florida Seafood Industry of Renewed Trade1 Chuck Adams2

    An Overview of the Cuban Commercial Fishing Industry and Implications to the Florida Seafood Industry of Renewed Trade1 Chuck Adams2

    Archival copy: for current recommendations see http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu or your local extension office. An Overview of the Cuban Commercial Fishing Industry and Implications to the Florida Seafood Industry of Renewed Trade1 Chuck Adams2 Abstract Introduction The Cuban seafood industry has long been an The commercial fishing industry of Cuba is an important supplier of certain high-valued seafood important source of fisheries products originating products for the world market. In addition, the from the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean region. Cuba industry has historically played an important role in historically fielded a large distant-water fleet that was providing seafood products for domestic markets in engaged in the harvest of subtropical and temperate Cuba. Assistance from the Soviet Union led to the fisheries stocks. Cuba has more recently played an development of a large distant-water fleet, which increasingly important role in the world market for produced large volumes of low-valued seafood seafood products, particularly for high-valued finfish products. The nearshore fleets continue to produce and shellfish. However, given the evolution in the high-valued species for export markets. The loss of global political environment of the early 1990s, Soviet assistance, following the break up of the Cuba's commercial fishing industry has changed Soviet Union, has dramatically affected the manner dramatically. As a result, production emphasis has in which the Cuban fishing industry is conducted. shifted from high-volume, low-valued pelagic stocks More recently, management of nearshore fleets, to high-valued nearshore fisheries, aquaculture, and associated service industries, and processing facilities shrimp culture.
  • Microencapsulated Diets to Improve Bivalve Shellfish Aquaculture For

    Microencapsulated Diets to Improve Bivalve Shellfish Aquaculture For

    Global Food Security 23 (2019) 64–73 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Global Food Security journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gfs Microencapsulated diets to improve bivalve shellfish aquaculture for global food security T ∗ David F. Willer , David C. Aldridge Department of Zoology, The David Attenborough Building, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QY, United Kingdom ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: There is a global need to sustainably increase aquaculture production to meet the needs of a growing population. Microencapsulated diet Bivalve shellfish aquaculture is highly attractive from a human nutrition, economic, environmental and eco- Bivalve shellfish system standpoint. However, bivalve industry growth is falling behind fish aquaculture due to critical problems Food security in the production process. Feed defects, disease, and quality issues are limiting production. New advances in Aquaculture microencapsulation technology have great potential to tackle these problems. Microencapsulated diets could Sustainable efficiently deliver high-quality nutrients, disease control agents, and quality enhancers to bivalves. Microencapsulation has the potential to drive improvements in bivalve production, reduce production costs, enhance human nutrition and minimise impacts on the environment. 1. The global importance of bivalve shellfish aquaculture fastest growing food sector (FAO, 2017; Jacquet et al., 2017; Tacon and Metian, 2013; Troell et al., 2014). However, like terrestrial meat pro- 1.1. Bivalves a strategic food source to sustainably feed a growing global duction aquaculture is currently expanding in an unsustainable way population (Godfray et al., 2010; Jacquet et al., 2017). Production quantity of carnivorous species such as salmon, catfish, and shrimp has ballooned, Over 800 million people worldwide are hungry, one billion have growing 84% over the last decade, and today salmon is the largest inadequate protein intake, and an even greater number suffer from single commodity in aquaculture (FAO, 2017, 2016).
  • Resources for Fish Feed in Future Mariculture

    Resources for Fish Feed in Future Mariculture

    Vol. 1: 187–200, 2011 AQUACULTURE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS Published online March 10 doi: 10.3354/aei00019 Aquacult Environ Interact OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS AS I SEE IT Resources for fish feed in future mariculture Yngvar Olsen* Trondhjem Biological Station, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway ABSTRACT: There is a growing concern about the ability to produce enough nutritious food to feed the global human population in this century. Environmental conflicts and a limited freshwater supply constrain further developments in agriculture; global fisheries have levelled off, and aquaculture may have to play a more prominent role in supplying human food. Freshwater is important, but it is also a major challenge to cultivate the oceans in an environmentally, economically and energy- friendly way. To support this, a long-term vision must be to derive new sources of feed, primarily taken from outside the human food chain, and to move carnivore production to a lower trophic level. The main aim of this paper is to speculate on how feed supplies can be produced for an expanding aquaculture industry by and beyond 2050 and to establish a roadmap of the actions needed to achieve this. Resources from agriculture, fish meal and fish oil are the major components of pellet fish feeds. All cultured animals take advantage of a certain fraction of fish meal in the feed, and marine carnivores depend on a supply of marine lipids containing highly unsaturated fatty acids (HUFA, with ≥3 double bonds and ≥20 carbon chain length) in the feed. The availability of HUFA is likely the main constraint for developing carnivore aquaculture in the next decades.
  • Cobia and Pompano Handbook

    Cobia and Pompano Handbook

    CMFRI Booklet Series No. 19/2019 2019 CMFRI Booklet Series No. 19/2019 \\_Ii--/}// \<�\\:I,. t.;w1 Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute !1�= Practical Hand Book on CMFR Seed Production of Cobia and Silver Pompano Prepared by Dr.A.K.AbdulNazar Dr. R. layakumar Dr. G. Tamilmani Dr. M. Sakthivel Dr. P. Ramesh Kumar Dr.K.K.Anikuttan M.Sankar Mandapam Regional Centre of CMFRI Mandapam Camp - 623 520 Tamil Nadu, India 2019 © 2019 ICAR –Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute CMFRI Booklet Series No. 19/2019 Published by Dr. A. Gopalakrishnan Director !CAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Kochi - 682 018 Typeset and Printed by Rehana Offset Printers, Srivilliputtur - 626 125 Phone : 04563-260383, E-mail : [email protected] PREFACE Mariculture – the farming and husbandry of marine plants and animals of commercial importance, is an untapped sector of sea food production in India. Mariculture has been contributing substantially to the global fish production in recent years. It accounted for about 29.2 per cent of world aquaculture production by value. It is a fact that India is still in infancy in mariculture production in the global scenario. Since mariculture is the only hope for increasing seafood production in the coming years, the research and development in this sector is of paramount importance. In fact, such thrust was not given in India and hence, it was felt necessary to develop viable seed production and farming technologies to develop mariculture. The R&D efforts in this direction yielded commendable results within a few years and Mandapam Regional Centre of ICAR CMFRI succeeded in captive breeding and seed production of two high value marine fishes namely, Cobia, Rachycentron canadum and Silver pompano, Trachinotus blochii for the first time in the country.
  • (DNR) – Fisheries Division Fish Hatcheries Performance – Fiscal Year 2019

    (DNR) – Fisheries Division Fish Hatcheries Performance – Fiscal Year 2019

    Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) – Fisheries Division Fish Hatcheries Performance – Fiscal Year 2019 The DNR Fisheries Division Fish Production Section (FPS) maintains and operates six extensive, cold water fish hatcheries, three of which also produce cool water species (Table 1). There are also several ancillary programs managed by FPS to provide the support necessary to run a quality fish stocking program. Those include Fish Health and Quality, Fish Stocking, Fish Marking, and Electronics. Table 1. Location of and species reared by Michigan DNR Fish Hatcheries Hatchery Name Location Species Reared Steelhead, Chinook Salmon, Wolf Lake State Fish Hatchery Mattawan (Van Buren County) Muskellunge, Walleye Rainbow Trout, Brown Trout, Harrietta State Fish Hatchery Harrietta (Wexford County) Atlantic Salmon Coho Salmon, Chinook Salmon, Platte River State Fish Hatchery Honor (Benzie County) Atlantic Salmon, Walleye Rainbow Trout, Brown Trout, Oden State Fish Hatchery Alanson (Emmet County) Arctic Grayling Steelhead, Chinook Salmon, Thompson State Fish Hatchery Thompson (Schoolcraft County) Walleye Brook Trout, Lake Trout, Splake Marquette State Fish Hatchery Marquette (Marquette County) (Hybrid) Recreational fishing in Michigan is a significant economic driver, estimated at $2.3 billion. Fish stocking is one of the few tools available for fisheries professionals to use in managing the state’s world-class fisheries. Fish are stocked for three primary reasons: • Provide diverse fishing opportunities (e.g. walleye, steelhead) • Maintain ecosystem balance (e.g. Chinook salmon) • Rehabilitate depressed fish populations (e.g. lake sturgeon) The following summarizes the performance of the six DNR fish production facilities in five areas of focus during fiscal year 2019. Broodstock Management Broodstock management includes rearing and maintenance of captive brood populations at Oden Hatchery and Marquette Hatchery, as well as collecting gametes from feral stock.
  • Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus Dofleini) Care Manual

    Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus Dofleini) Care Manual

    Giant Pacific Octopus Insert Photo within this space (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual CREATED BY AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxonomic Advisory Group IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA Animal Welfare Committee Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxon Advisory Group (AITAG) (2014). Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual. Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Silver Spring, MD. Original Completion Date: September 2014 Dedication: This work is dedicated to the memory of Roland C. Anderson, who passed away suddenly before its completion. No one person is more responsible for advancing and elevating the state of husbandry of this species, and we hope his lifelong body of work will inspire the next generation of aquarists towards the same ideals. Authors and Significant Contributors: Barrett L. Christie, The Dallas Zoo and Children’s Aquarium at Fair Park, AITAG Steering Committee Alan Peters, Smithsonian Institution, National Zoological Park, AITAG Steering Committee Gregory J. Barord, City University of New York, AITAG Advisor Mark J. Rehling, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo Roland C. Anderson, PhD Reviewers: Mike Brittsan, Columbus Zoo and Aquarium Paula Carlson, Dallas World Aquarium Marie Collins, Sea Life Aquarium Carlsbad David DeNardo, New York Aquarium Joshua Frey Sr., Downtown Aquarium Houston Jay Hemdal, Toledo
  • Marine Aquaculture Development in Egypt

    Marine Aquaculture Development in Egypt

    MEGAPESCA Rua Gago Coutinho 11 Valado de Santa Quitéria 2460 – 207 Alfeizerão Portugal Telephone: (+351) 262 990 372 Fax: (+351) 262 990 496 EMAIL: [email protected] Website: http://www.megapesca.com MARINE AQUACULTURE IN EGYPT CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1 2 PRODUCTION AND MARKETING OF FISH IN EGYPT......................................................2 2.1 FISH PRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................2 2.2 INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN FISHERY PRODUCTS .........................................................................5 2.3 FISH SUPPLIES TO MARKET AND CONSUMPTION .........................................................................5 2.4 CONTRIBUTION OF AQUACULTURE TO FISH CONSUMPTION........................................................6 2.5 PRICES OF FISH PRODUCTS FROM AQUACULTURE ......................................................................8 2.5.1 Seabass and seabream......................................................................................................9 3 OVERVIEW OF SECTOR DEVELOPMENTS SINCE 1996 .................................................13 3.1 PRODUCTION OF MARINE SPECIES............................................................................................13 3.1.1 North Sinai......................................................................................................................13
  • Alaska Salmon Hatcheries Jessica Eller

    Alaska Salmon Hatcheries Jessica Eller

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Graduate School Professional Papers 2018 Policy Analysis: Alaska Salmon Hatcheries Jessica Eller Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Recommended Citation Eller, Jessica, "Policy Analysis: Alaska Salmon Hatcheries" (2018). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 11231. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/11231 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLICY ANALYSIS: ALASKA SALMON HATCHERIES BY JESSICA JEAN ELLER Bachelor of Arts, University of Alaska Southeast, Juneau, Alaska, 2011 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Studies The University of Montana Missoula, MT Spring 2018 Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Len Broberg, Chair Environmental Studies Shawn Johnson Center for Natural Resources and Environmental Policy Shoren Brown Environmental Studies Eller, Jessica, Master of Science, Spring 2018 Environmental Studies POLICY ANALYSIS: ALASKA SALMON HATCHERIES Chairperson: Len Broberg Using an adapted Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) - Evaluation, this study analyzes policy regulating Alaska salmon hatcheries to evaluate its effectiveness at sustaining wild salmon runs. When Alaska became a state in 1959, its salmon industry was suffering from years of overfishing.