DOCSLIB.ORG

Fish Hatchery Production Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

revised fish hatchery production plan final environmental assessment NOTE: In May 2006, the Mitigation Commission revised this 1998 Plan Revision to make minor changes to two cold-water hatcheries included herein: Whiterocks State Fish Hatchery and Jones Hole National Fish Hatchery. Project production levels and funding at all other facilities included in this 1998 Plan remain unchanged. The 2006 revision is located at the end of this 1998 Plan. U.s. fish and wildlife service utah reclamation mitigation and conservation commission february 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 PURPOSE, NEED AND ISSUES Introduction .............................................................1-1 Background .............................................................1-1 Purpose and Need ........................................................1-2 Proposed Action ..........................................................1-9 Issue Identification........................................................1-12 CHAPTER 2 proposed action and ALTERNATIVES Introduction .............................................................2-1 No Action Alternative.....................................................2-1 Proposed Action Alternative ................................................2-2 Maximum Capacity Alternative..............................................2-4 Alternatives Considered But Eliminated.......................................2-4 CHAPTER 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Analysis................................................................3-1 Purpose and Need ........................................................3-7 Chapter 4 References, acronyms and definitions References..............................................................4-1 Acronyms ...............................................................4-2 Definitions..............................................................4-3 Chapter 5 comments and responses Comments and Responses ..................................................5-1 Comment Letters.........................................................5-45 appendices a workgroup membership and plan history .......... A-1 b CRSP-affected area waters............................ B-1 c management objectives and fish needs .............. C-1 d division Fish stocking and transfer procedures.... D-1 e site specific feasibility review ........................ E-1 f meeting the need ...................................... F-1 LIST OF TABLES 1. Annual totals for cold-water fish needs for CRSP-affected area waters, in pounds 1-5 2. Annual totals for warm-water fish needs, in pounds .......................1-8 3. Annual totals for amphibians needs, in numbers of individuals ...............1-9 4. Purpose and need underlying the proposed action ..........................1-10 5. Summary of alternatives .............................................2-6 6. Economic summary of alternatives .....................................3-4 7. Summary of environmental effects of alternatives .........................3-6 8. Summary of purpose and need analysis..................................3-12 chapter 1 PURPOSE, NEED and issues INTRODUCTION implement1. The CUPCA (Section 313(c), Fish and Wildlife Features in the Colorado The purpose of this Environmental River Storage Project) identified $22.8 Assessment (EA) is to evaluate the Revised million for hatchery rehabilitation and Fish Hatchery Production Plan (Plan) construction to meet warm- and cold-water submitted by the Hatchery Workgroup (see fish-stocking needs in CRSP-affected area Appendix A for a list of Workgroup waters. The 1997 Mitigation and membership and history of the original Conservation Plan includes a Statewide plan). The Plan consists of Program Element for fish hatchery recommendations to meet a portion of the restoration and construction. CUPCA fish-stocking needs in the Colorado River requires the Plan as a condition to complete Storage Project (CRSP)-affected area this program element. Fish hatchery waters. The Plan is presented as the restoration and construction has not been Proposed Action Alternative in the EA. It proposed or committed as a federal has not been prepared as a separate mitigation measure for CRSP impacts in document. Utah in lieu of measures to avoid or reduce or compensate for adverse impacts on fish The CRSP-affected area entails waters populations or habitats. Rather, these affected by CRSP storage unit measures are proposed to improve and facilities—Flaming Gorge and Lake increase the culture and production of native Powell—and facilities constructed under a and non-native species for stocking of CRSP-participating project, which are the recreational fisheries and for conservation Emery County Project—Joe’s Valley and recovery needs. This program will help Reservoir and Huntington North support recreational opportunities and other Reservoir—and the Central Utah Project mitigation and conservation measures (CUP)—several units—in Utah. A list of previously implemented or currently these projects and the related impacted planned. waters is included as Appendix B. BACKGROUND 1Under CUPCA, the hatchery element must The Central Utah Project Completion Act be achieved within the ecosystem restoration (CUPCA) established the Utah Reclamation requirement of §301. The Commission published its Mitigation and Conservation Commission first 5-year Mitigation and Conservation Plan in May, (Commission) to coordinate fish, wildlife 1996, with specific direction from Congress that the and recreation conservation projects as Commission’s program employ an ecosystem approach, public involvement, measures based on mitigation for Federal reclamation projects best available scientific knowledge and partnerships. in Utah, particularly, CUP’s Bonneville Project evaluation was based on five decision factors: Unit. CUPCA directed the Commission to benefits to fish, wildlife and recreation resources; develop a Mitigation and Conservation Plan fiscal responsibility; agency and public involvement and commitment; consistency with laws and that identifies projects the Commission will programs and other contributions. chapter 1 PURPOSE, NEED and issues 1-1 The Commission has determined that, based Federal fish hatchery. But, those demands on updated information, a Plan revision is can no longer be met as the fish hatcheries necessary. This revision incorporates the are deteriorating and losing fish production Mitigation and Conservation Plan capacity. (Commission 1997) priorities, hatchery feasibility study results (HRS 1996, JDK The CRSP facilities and their operation 1990a, 1990b, FishPro 1996a, 1996b, 1997), impacted many aquatic habitats for wild fish the stocking assessment report (BIO/WEST, and native species. Recovery or Inc. 1997) results, and the Utah Division of conservation of native species may require Wildlife Resources (Division) Fish Stocking reintroduction or supplementation to achieve and Transfer Procedures (Division 1997c). the desired population levels or protection of genetic diversity. The native species would 106 STAT. 4640 Public Law 102-575-- come from a designated facility (hatchery or Oct. 30, 1992 stream side hatching unit). The appropriate SEC. 313. FISH AND WILDLIFE role for hatchery production in species FEATURES IN THE COLORADO RIVER conservation and restoration is identified STORAGE PROJECT. through recovery and conservation (c) FISH HATCHERY strategies. PRODUCTION.--$22,800,000 shall be available only for the planning and implementation of Desired Condition The overall need for the improvements to existing hatchery facilities or Commission adopting and implementing the the construction and development of new fish revised Plan is to increase production of hatcheries to increase production of warmwater and coldwater fishes for the areas affected by the warm- and cold-water fishes from hatcheries Colorado River Storage Project in Utah. Such to meet Federal, State and Tribal fishery improvements and construction shall be resources’ long-term needs and management implemented in accordance with a plan objectives in the CRSP-affected area waters. identifying the long-term needs and management objectives for hatchery production prepared by These management objectives vary with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, in program, water and season. Objectives for consultation with the Utah Division of Wildlife waters that are stocked consider species, Resources, and adopted by the Commission. strain, stock, health or fitness (ability to The cost of operating and maintaining such new survive and reproduce in a given or improved facilities shall be borne by the Secretary. environment). This need is captured in the 1997 Mitigation Plan’s Desired Future Condition statement: PURPOSE AND NEED Warm water and cold water fish Existing Condition The CRSP facilities production and reservoir stocking contributed to the demand for hatchery- needs in the State are met, providing reared products by creating large reservoirs a variety of sport fish opportunities to in Utah that provide millions of angling the public. Through the hatchery hours, but require stocking to sustain them. program, native fish populations are Sport fish stocking demands have been met augmented to meet conservation in the past by State fish hatcheries and a and recovery needs. chapter 1 PURPOSE, NEED and issues 1-2 In addition to meeting warm- and cold-water # Evaluate existing capability and fish production and native fish populations proposed rehabilitation and needs, projects included in the Plan should construction
Recommended publications
  • Overview of the Marine Fish Hatchery Industry in Taiwan

    Overview of the Marine Fish Hatchery Industry in Taiwan

    Overview of the marine fish hatchery industry in Taiwan. Item Type Journal Contribution Authors Nocillado, Josephine N.; Liao, I Chiu Download date 01/10/2021 00:41:13 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/8923 Overview of the marine fish hatchery industry in Taiwan Josephine N. Nocilladoand I Chiu Liao Taiwan Fisheries Research Institute 199 Hou-Ih Road, Keelung 202 Taiwan T y p i c al broodstock ponds (right) in Taiwan. Striped threadfm broodstock are held in the pond on the lower right. At left is formulated broodstock diet During the Lunar New Year, the grandest of all holidays in Tai­ wan, images of fish are prominently displayed everywhere. Among the Taiwanese, fish is considered auspicious and a sym­ bol of bounty. This is because the pronunciation of “fish” (yü) is similar to that of “surplus” (yü), indicating abundance and pros­ perity. A fish specialty, with the fish preferably presented in its entirety, is a constant fare on the dining table during special occa­ sions. And in the true Taiwanese tradition, this most special dish is served as the last course, something truly worth waiting for, and remembered. It was in the 1960s that the first successes on artificial propa­ Not surprisingly, fish culture is itself an age-old traditiongation in were achieved, this time in several species of Chinese carps Taiwan. Rearing fish in captivity is almost an art form for manyand other tilapias. Art and science combined, fish propagation in Taiwanese aquafarmers who inherited the skill from many ofTaiwan their took off to a great start.
  • Cobia Database Articles Final Revision 2.0, 2-1-2017

    Cobia Database Articles Final Revision 2.0, 2-1-2017

    Revision 2.0 (2/1/2017) University of Miami Article TITLE DESCRIPTION AUTHORS SOURCE YEAR TOPICS Number Habitat 1 Gasterosteus canadus Linné [Latin] [No Abstract Available - First known description of cobia morphology in Carolina habitat by D. Garden.] Linnaeus, C. Systema Naturæ, ed. 12, vol. 1, 491 1766 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) Ichthyologie, vol. 10, Iconibus ex 2 Scomber niger Bloch [No Abstract Available - Description and alternative nomenclature of cobia.] Bloch, M. E. 1793 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) illustratum. Berlin. p . 48 The Fisheries and Fishery Industries of the Under this head was to be carried on the study of the useful aquatic animals and plants of the country, as well as of seals, whales, tmtles, fishes, lobsters, crabs, oysters, clams, etc., sponges, and marine plants aml inorganic products of U.S. Commission on Fisheries, Washington, 3 United States. Section 1: Natural history of Goode, G.B. 1884 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) the sea with reference to (A) geographical distribution, (B) size, (C) abundance, (D) migrations and movements, (E) food and rate of growth, (F) mode of reproduction, (G) economic value and uses. D.C., 895 p. useful aquatic animals Notes on the occurrence of a young crab- Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 4 eater (Elecate canada), from the lower [No Abstract Available - A description of cobia in the lower Hudson Eiver.] Fisher, A.K. 1891 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) 13, 195 Hudson Valley, New York The nomenclature of Rachicentron or Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum Habitat 5 Elacate, a genus of acanthopterygian The universally accepted name Elucate must unfortunately be supplanted by one entirely unknown to fame, overlooked by all naturalists, and found in no nomenclator.
  • Cobia and Pompano Handbook

    Cobia and Pompano Handbook

    CMFRI Booklet Series No. 19/2019 2019 CMFRI Booklet Series No. 19/2019 \\_Ii--/}// \<�\\:I,. t.;w1 Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute !1�= Practical Hand Book on CMFR Seed Production of Cobia and Silver Pompano Prepared by Dr.A.K.AbdulNazar Dr. R. layakumar Dr. G. Tamilmani Dr. M. Sakthivel Dr. P. Ramesh Kumar Dr.K.K.Anikuttan M.Sankar Mandapam Regional Centre of CMFRI Mandapam Camp - 623 520 Tamil Nadu, India 2019 © 2019 ICAR –Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute CMFRI Booklet Series No. 19/2019 Published by Dr. A. Gopalakrishnan Director !CAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Kochi - 682 018 Typeset and Printed by Rehana Offset Printers, Srivilliputtur - 626 125 Phone : 04563-260383, E-mail : [email protected] PREFACE Mariculture – the farming and husbandry of marine plants and animals of commercial importance, is an untapped sector of sea food production in India. Mariculture has been contributing substantially to the global fish production in recent years. It accounted for about 29.2 per cent of world aquaculture production by value. It is a fact that India is still in infancy in mariculture production in the global scenario. Since mariculture is the only hope for increasing seafood production in the coming years, the research and development in this sector is of paramount importance. In fact, such thrust was not given in India and hence, it was felt necessary to develop viable seed production and farming technologies to develop mariculture. The R&D efforts in this direction yielded commendable results within a few years and Mandapam Regional Centre of ICAR CMFRI succeeded in captive breeding and seed production of two high value marine fishes namely, Cobia, Rachycentron canadum and Silver pompano, Trachinotus blochii for the first time in the country.
  • (DNR) – Fisheries Division Fish Hatcheries Performance – Fiscal Year 2019

    (DNR) – Fisheries Division Fish Hatcheries Performance – Fiscal Year 2019

    Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) – Fisheries Division Fish Hatcheries Performance – Fiscal Year 2019 The DNR Fisheries Division Fish Production Section (FPS) maintains and operates six extensive, cold water fish hatcheries, three of which also produce cool water species (Table 1). There are also several ancillary programs managed by FPS to provide the support necessary to run a quality fish stocking program. Those include Fish Health and Quality, Fish Stocking, Fish Marking, and Electronics. Table 1. Location of and species reared by Michigan DNR Fish Hatcheries Hatchery Name Location Species Reared Steelhead, Chinook Salmon, Wolf Lake State Fish Hatchery Mattawan (Van Buren County) Muskellunge, Walleye Rainbow Trout, Brown Trout, Harrietta State Fish Hatchery Harrietta (Wexford County) Atlantic Salmon Coho Salmon, Chinook Salmon, Platte River State Fish Hatchery Honor (Benzie County) Atlantic Salmon, Walleye Rainbow Trout, Brown Trout, Oden State Fish Hatchery Alanson (Emmet County) Arctic Grayling Steelhead, Chinook Salmon, Thompson State Fish Hatchery Thompson (Schoolcraft County) Walleye Brook Trout, Lake Trout, Splake Marquette State Fish Hatchery Marquette (Marquette County) (Hybrid) Recreational fishing in Michigan is a significant economic driver, estimated at $2.3 billion. Fish stocking is one of the few tools available for fisheries professionals to use in managing the state’s world-class fisheries. Fish are stocked for three primary reasons: • Provide diverse fishing opportunities (e.g. walleye, steelhead) • Maintain ecosystem balance (e.g. Chinook salmon) • Rehabilitate depressed fish populations (e.g. lake sturgeon) The following summarizes the performance of the six DNR fish production facilities in five areas of focus during fiscal year 2019. Broodstock Management Broodstock management includes rearing and maintenance of captive brood populations at Oden Hatchery and Marquette Hatchery, as well as collecting gametes from feral stock.
  • Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus Dofleini) Care Manual

    Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus Dofleini) Care Manual

    Giant Pacific Octopus Insert Photo within this space (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual CREATED BY AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxonomic Advisory Group IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA Animal Welfare Committee Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxon Advisory Group (AITAG) (2014). Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual. Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Silver Spring, MD. Original Completion Date: September 2014 Dedication: This work is dedicated to the memory of Roland C. Anderson, who passed away suddenly before its completion. No one person is more responsible for advancing and elevating the state of husbandry of this species, and we hope his lifelong body of work will inspire the next generation of aquarists towards the same ideals. Authors and Significant Contributors: Barrett L. Christie, The Dallas Zoo and Children’s Aquarium at Fair Park, AITAG Steering Committee Alan Peters, Smithsonian Institution, National Zoological Park, AITAG Steering Committee Gregory J. Barord, City University of New York, AITAG Advisor Mark J. Rehling, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo Roland C. Anderson, PhD Reviewers: Mike Brittsan, Columbus Zoo and Aquarium Paula Carlson, Dallas World Aquarium Marie Collins, Sea Life Aquarium Carlsbad David DeNardo, New York Aquarium Joshua Frey Sr., Downtown Aquarium Houston Jay Hemdal, Toledo
  • Marine Aquaculture Development in Egypt

    Marine Aquaculture Development in Egypt

    MEGAPESCA Rua Gago Coutinho 11 Valado de Santa Quitéria 2460 – 207 Alfeizerão Portugal Telephone: (+351) 262 990 372 Fax: (+351) 262 990 496 EMAIL: [email protected] Website: http://www.megapesca.com MARINE AQUACULTURE IN EGYPT CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................1 2 PRODUCTION AND MARKETING OF FISH IN EGYPT......................................................2 2.1 FISH PRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................2 2.2 INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN FISHERY PRODUCTS .........................................................................5 2.3 FISH SUPPLIES TO MARKET AND CONSUMPTION .........................................................................5 2.4 CONTRIBUTION OF AQUACULTURE TO FISH CONSUMPTION........................................................6 2.5 PRICES OF FISH PRODUCTS FROM AQUACULTURE ......................................................................8 2.5.1 Seabass and seabream......................................................................................................9 3 OVERVIEW OF SECTOR DEVELOPMENTS SINCE 1996 .................................................13 3.1 PRODUCTION OF MARINE SPECIES............................................................................................13 3.1.1 North Sinai......................................................................................................................13
  • Alaska Salmon Hatcheries Jessica Eller

    Alaska Salmon Hatcheries Jessica Eller

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Graduate School Professional Papers 2018 Policy Analysis: Alaska Salmon Hatcheries Jessica Eller Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Recommended Citation Eller, Jessica, "Policy Analysis: Alaska Salmon Hatcheries" (2018). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 11231. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/11231 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLICY ANALYSIS: ALASKA SALMON HATCHERIES BY JESSICA JEAN ELLER Bachelor of Arts, University of Alaska Southeast, Juneau, Alaska, 2011 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Studies The University of Montana Missoula, MT Spring 2018 Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Len Broberg, Chair Environmental Studies Shawn Johnson Center for Natural Resources and Environmental Policy Shoren Brown Environmental Studies Eller, Jessica, Master of Science, Spring 2018 Environmental Studies POLICY ANALYSIS: ALASKA SALMON HATCHERIES Chairperson: Len Broberg Using an adapted Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) - Evaluation, this study analyzes policy regulating Alaska salmon hatcheries to evaluate its effectiveness at sustaining wild salmon runs. When Alaska became a state in 1959, its salmon industry was suffering from years of overfishing.
  • FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations

    FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations

    FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations .........................................................................................3 Region 1 Reports: Northwest Montana ..........................................................................................................5 Region 2 Reports: West Central Montana .....................................................................................................17 Region 3 Reports: Southwest Montana ........................................................................................................34 Region 4 Reports: North Central Montana ...................................................................................................44 Region 5 Reports: South Central Montana ...................................................................................................65 Region 6 Reports: Northeast Montana ........................................................................................................73 Region 7 Reports: Southeast Montana .........................................................................................................86 Montana Fish Hatchery Reports: .......................................................................................................................92 Murray Springs Trout Hatchery ...................................................................................................................92 Washoe Park Trout Hatchery .......................................................................................................................93
  • A Review of Hatchery Reform Science in Washington State

    A Review of Hatchery Reform Science in Washington State

    A review of hatchery reform science in Washington State Joseph H. Anderson, Kenneth I. Warheit, Bethany E. Craig, Todd R. Seamons and Alf H. Haukenes Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Final report to the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission January 23 2020 Table of Contents ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 10 BENEFITS OF HATCHERIES ............................................................................................................. 13 Harvest benefits ........................................................................................................................ 13 Economic benefits ................................................................................................................. 14 Social and cultural benefits ................................................................................................... 15 Treaty rights and tribal values ............................................................................................... 17 Mitigation .............................................................................................................................. 18 Conservation benefits ............................................................................................................... 19 Population conservation ......................................................................................................
  • A Review of Cage Aquaculture: Asia (Excluding China)

    A Review of Cage Aquaculture: Asia (Excluding China)

    18 Cage aquaculture production 2005 Data were taken from fisheries statistics submitted to FAO by the member countries for 2005. In case 2005 data were not available, 2004 data were used. Map background image Blue Marble: Next generation courtesy of NASA’s Earth Observatory 19 A review of cage aquaculture: Asia (excluding China) 21 A review of cage aquaculture: Asia (excluding China) Sena S. De Silva1 and Michael J. Phillips1 De Silva, S.S. and Phillips, M.J. A review of cage aquaculture: Asia (excluding China). In M. Halwart, D. Soto and J.R. Arthur (eds). Cage aquaculture – Regional reviews and global overview, pp. 18–48. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 498. Rome, FAO. 2007. 241 pp. ABSTRACT Cage farming in Asia is practiced in fresh, brackish and inshore coastal waters. Freshwater cage farming is a very old tradition that is thought to have originated in some of the Mekong Basin countries. It currently occurs in all freshwater habitats and is extremely diverse in nature, varying in cage design, intensity of practice, husbandry methods and the species farmed. In general, freshwater cage farming is practiced on a small scale, but in some instances clustering of cage operations can contribute a significant level of production, as in the case of pangasiid catfish culture in the Mekong Delta and the combination of common carp (Cyprinus carpio carpio) and tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) farming in some Indonesian reservoirs. Overall, although clear-cut statistics are not available, cage farming is thought to be the most predominant form of freshwater aquaculture in Asia. In this paper, freshwater cage farming is only briefly considered; it has recently been reviewed by the authors (see Phillips and De Silva, 2006).
  • “Pompano Farms – 2004”

    “Pompano Farms – 2004”

    “POMPANO FARMS – 2004” M.F. McMaster, T.C. Kloth, J.F. Coburn Mariculture Technologies International, Inc. Oak Hill, FL Background: The authors of this article are the principals of a Florida Corporation named Mariculture Technologies International, Inc. (MTI). This group was the first to farm the Florida Pompano (Trachinotus carolinus) starting in 1971. Developing technical skills and advancing understanding of this and other marine species has been an ongoing lifetime project. At present, MTI operates a new ten acre mariculture site in Oak Hill, Florida. Starting in 2002 the company consolidated its various operations and interests to this new location. Currently these include live and frozen brine shrimp (Artemia salina), farmed pompano targeted at the live seafood market, and farmed pigfish (Orthopristis chrysoptera) for the live marine baitfish market. In 2003 the authors presented a technical paper at Aquaculture America in Louisville, Kentucky titled “Prospects for Commercial Pompano Mariculture-2003”. An on-line copy of the complete paper can be found at www.PompanoFarms.com. Pompano Farms and Northeast Brine Shrimp are both registered DBA’s of Mariculture Technologies International, Inc.. In addition to those sites, the MTI corporate site is at www.Mariculturetechnology.com. Two major points were made in the WAS-Kentucky paper. First, the technology for the monthly production of pompano eggs, hatchery fry and adult fish is well known and practiced (by MTI). McMaster and Kloth designed and operated a commercial pompano farm in the Dominican Republic as well as a pompano broodstock and hatchery facility in Plantation Key, Florida. The commercial farm was a complete entity with broodstock, hatchery and grow-out (concrete tanks) facilities.
  • Aquaponics System

    Aquaponics System

    Aquaponics System Aquaponics is an integrated fish and plant production technology, essentially comprising of two sub-systems, viz., ‘Aquaculture’ and ‘Hydroponics’. The underlying principle is to efficiently utilize water to produce two crops rather than one and to partition and share nutrient resources between fish and plants. This farming system is commonly used in resource limited and urban areas to raise both fish and vegetable in an integrated system. Aquaponics involves culture of horticulture plants along with fishes. Many plants are suitable for aquaponics systems, though which ones work for a specific system depends on the maturity and stocking density of the fish. Green leafy vegetables with low to medium nutrient requirements are well adapted to aquaponics systems, including capsicum, tomatoes, lettuce, cabbage, lettuce, basil, spinach, chives, herbs, and watercress. It is basically a Recirculation Culture System, wherein fish are fed with quality floating pellet feed and waste generated from fish are pumped into bio-filter troughs having horticulture plants, the flow rate of water is to be adjusted with the help of the timer. The fishes and plants grown in aquaponics system are totally organic. Even though the initial investment of the system is high, the recurring cost is less and gives reasonable returns. This system is having the advantage of using less water, lesser area of land, waste renewal, less labour, etc. Plants and animals in an Aquaponic System have a symbiotic relationship with each other. The fish excreta provide nutrients for the plants, while the plants clean the water, creating a suitable environment for the fish to grow.