A Study of the Theatrical Works of Olympe De Gouges 1748-1793

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Study of the Theatrical Works of Olympe De Gouges 1748-1793 i TITLE OF THESIS: Liberté, Égalité, Sororité : A Study of the Theatrical Works of Olympe de Gouges 1748-1793. Name of Author: Vivien Hennessy Research Masters Thesis in Arts (French Studies) Department of French Studies Mary Immaculate College University of Limerick Internal Supervisor: Mr. Darach Sanfey Internal Examiner: Prof. Geraldine Sheridan External Examiner: Dr. Síofra Pierse Submitted to Mary Immaculate College: 18th September 2012 ii Abstract Liberté, Égalité, Sororité: A Study of the Theatrical Works of Olympe de Gouges 1748-1793. Author: Vivien Hennessy Marie Olympe de Gouges was born Marie Gouze in Montauban, France on the seventh of May 1748. Widowed at the age of eighteen, she left her native Montauban accompanied by her young son to pursue a career as a writer in Paris in 1766. Changing her name to Olympe de Gouges, she forged a new identity for herself as a political pamphleteer, social activist, revolutionary sympathiser and playwright. Throughout her time as a writer she courted controversy for her proto-feminist principles and uncompromising advocacy of the cause of the abolitionists. De Gouges is principally remembered for her political and feminist writings, however she wished above all to be considered as a femme de lettres. This thesis involves a detailed study of the complete dramatic works of Olympe de Gouges, and aims to increase awareness of an important area of the playwright’s literary repertoire which is deserving of greater critical attention. Olympe de Gouges was found guilty of ‘pro- royalist’ sentiment by the revolutionaries and was thus executed on the third of November 1793. Altogether it is believed that she wrote around nineteen plays, twelve of which remain for posterity, and it is these plays which are examined in this thesis under the thematic headings of liberté, égalité and sororité. iii Acknowledgements I would like to take this opportunity to thank Mr. Darach Sanfey for his invaluable insight, advice and wisdom in the supervision of this thesis. I would also like to thank Dr. Loïc Guyon, the head of the French Department of Mary Immaculate College, for his kind encouragement. To all my family and friends, as well as my colleagues in the French Department, I would like to express my sincere gratitude for your support and guidance. Above all, this project is dedicated to my four children, Dolores, Hema, Ciara and Fionn; may the guiding lights of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity shine on your life’s path. iv Dedication À mes enfants v Declaration I hereby declare that this dissertation is entirely my own work and has not, in full or part, been submitted to any other institutions. Signed: ……………………………………………………….. Vivien Hennessy September 2012 vi Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………...ii Acknowledgments…………………………………………………………………..iii Dedication…………………………………………………………………………...iv Declaration…………………………………………………………………………...v Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………vi Introduction………………………………………………………………………….1 Section One: Liberté……………………………………………………………….11 Chapter One: Personal Liberty……………………………………………………..12 Chapter Two: Libertinage…………………………………………………………..25 Chapter Three: Freedom from Traditional Frameworks: redefining family.............38 Section Two: Égalité……………………………………………………………….50 Chapter Four: Social Division and Feudal Tradition………………………………51 Chapter Five: The Monarchy, The Clergy and The Military……………………….65 Chapter Six: Race and Gender……………………………………………………..79 Section Three: Sororité…………………………………………………………….89 Chapter Seven: Performing Sisterhood…………………………………………….90 Chapter Eight: Male Redemption through Female Intervention…………………..101 vii Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………112 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………….118 Appendix……………………………………………………………………….i-xxxvi 1 Introduction To any scholar of French eighteenth-century studies, Olympe de Gouges needs little or no introduction. She is principally celebrated for her proto-feminist philosophies, as well as her political pamphleteering, and her most enduring work, the Déclaration des droits de la femme et de la citoyenne (1791), a feminist revision of the Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen (1789), is still considered to be one of the cornerstones of early feminist thought. However, of all the titles bestowed upon de Gouges, from proto-feminist to political thinker and abolitionist advocate, her designation of preference was undoubtedly, femme de lettres. Olympe de Gouges’ true passion was for the theatre, a fact stated personally by the author on numerous occasions. In the preface to the 1791 publication of Le Couvent ou les vœux forcés, de Gouges describes her devotion to writing: La littérature est une passion qui porte jusqu'au délire. Cette passion m'a constamment occupée pendant dix années de ma vie. Elle a ses inquiétudes, ses alarmes, ses tourments, comme celle de l'amour…Il m'a pris fantaisie de faire fortune, je veux la faire, et je la ferai. Je la ferai, dis-je, en dépit des envieux, de la critique et du sort même […]1 Nevertheless, to date, de Gouges’ complete dramaturgy remains a relatively neglected area of her literary repertoire. It was not until 1981, with the publication of her biography by the historian Olivier Blanc, almost two hundred years after her trial and death by execution, 1 Olympe De Gouges, preface to Le Couvent ou les vœux forcés, Olympe de Gouges, Théâtre, Tome I (Paris: Indigo et Côté-femmes éditions, 1991), p. 34. 2 that a revival of interest in this fascinating and pivotal figure of Revolutionary history was to initiate. Yet heretofore critical attention has been focused mainly on de Gouges’ politics, and her significance as a proponent of proto-feminist ideology. Though recent studies from acclaimed academics, notably those of Gisela Thiele-Knobloch, Janie Vanpée and Joan Wallach-Scott, have concentrated on some of her theatrical works, there is as yet no comprehensive analysis of her dramatic corpus as a whole. Critics have tended to regard de Gouges’ dramaturgy as a footnote to her political writings, however this thesis endeavours to highlight her theatrical works as a noteworthy contribution to eighteenth-century literature. This thesis aims to provide a detailed analysis of the complete dramaturgy of Olympe de Gouges, and proposes that the playwright be considered as an eighteenth- century femme de lettres of note. As such, this analysis supports the claim by Blanc that: ‘C’est un auteur de comédies ou de drames qui valaient bien la plupart des productions […] de l’époque.’2 Blanc’s hypothesis will be validated by a close reading of de Gouges’ dramatic works, while an examination of the tropes of liberté, égalité and sororité will underscore the important social, philosophical and political import contained therein. From comedy to tragedy, melodrama to political polemic, de Gouges’ dramaturgy is markedly of a social nature. As befitted the didactic function of such ‘social theatre’, the playwright strove to highlight contemporaneous concerns and to dramatise popular themes 2 Olivier Blanc, Olympe de Gouges, with a preface by Claude Manceron (Paris: Éditions Syros, 1981) p.5. 3 which were increasingly pertinent in an era of great social change.3 De Gouges particularly engaged herself with the depiction of those she considered marginalised and subjugated, such as slaves, domestics and women. Camille Aubaud asserts that: ‘Les pièces d’Olympe de Gouges clament les souffrances et les résignations de tous les opprimés.’4 De Gouges’ theatre has at times been criticised for employing somewhat flimsy plotlines, or for indulging in overt bathos. However the dramatist’s social commentary is always lucid and forthright. She also displayed a keen ear for language and characterisation. Memorable dialogue, as exemplified in such plays as Molière chez Ninon (1787), and lively rhetoric, as illustrated in her political dramas, among them L’Entrée de Dumouriez à Bruxelles (1792), are the hallmarks of de Gouges’ unique style, always assuring a fresh perspective and a novel approach to familiar themes. Yet actual stage performance, or the lack thereof, is the tragedy behind the history of de Gouges’ dramatic works. Between 1783 and 1792, de Gouges wrote some twenty plays, of which only twelve remain. The last of her dramas, Le Tyran détrôné ou La France sauvée (1792) is incomplete, but was cited as evidence of her subverse intentions at the time of her trial, for its supposed espousal of pro-royalist sympathies. Of these plays, only four were publicly performed, and only one, Le Couvent ou les vœux forcés (1790) had a successful run, staged on no fewer than eighty occasions from the time of its first production on the fourth of October 1790 at the Théâtre National Comique et Lyrique. 3 For more see R. Emmet Kennedy, Marie Netter and Mark Olsen, Theatre, Opera and Audiences in Revolutionary Paris: Analysis and Repetory, (Greenwood: Praeger, 1996), where such ‘social theatre’ is defined as performances designed to reflect and portray social concerns above philosophical concepts or political dogma. 4 Camille Aubaud, Lire les femmes de lettres (Paris: Dunod, 1993), p. 92. 4 The reasons for this low number of public performances are twofold. Firstly, as observed by Gisela Thiele-Knobloch: ‘[…] la réserve extrême du monde théâtral et du public envers les productions des femmes’ was undoubtedly a factor.5 Secondly, the playwright’s fraught relationship with leading theatrical institutions, notably the Comédie Française, earned her a reputation as a difficult and demanding
Recommended publications
  • Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Honors College 5-2014 Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789 Kiley Bickford University of Maine - Main Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors Part of the Cultural History Commons Recommended Citation Bickford, Kiley, "Nationalism in the French Revolution of 1789" (2014). Honors College. 147. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors/147 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NATIONALISM IN THE FRENCH REVOLUTION OF 1789 by Kiley Bickford A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for a Degree with Honors (History) The Honors College University of Maine May 2014 Advisory Committee: Richard Blanke, Professor of History Alexander Grab, Adelaide & Alan Bird Professor of History Angela Haas, Visiting Assistant Professor of History Raymond Pelletier, Associate Professor of French, Emeritus Chris Mares, Director of the Intensive English Institute, Honors College Copyright 2014 by Kiley Bickford All rights reserved. Abstract The French Revolution of 1789 was instrumental in the emergence and growth of modern nationalism, the idea that a state should represent, and serve the interests of, a people, or "nation," that shares a common culture and history and feels as one. But national ideas, often with their source in the otherwise cosmopolitan world of the Enlightenment, were also an important cause of the Revolution itself. The rhetoric and documents of the Revolution demonstrate the importance of national ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline; Follow Them Very Carefully
    The University of Calgary Historical Studies (HTST) 201 (01) The History of Europe: EUROPE SINCE 1500 Winter 2017 Class times and location: Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, 9:00 - 9:50 a.m., ICT 121 Instructor: Brad Rennie Office: SS 615 E-mail: [email protected] Office hours: 10:00 - 10:40 a.m. or by appointment Course Description: This course examines major events and developments in European history since 1500, including the Renaissance, the Reformation, the Scientific Revolution, the Enlightenment, the French Revolution, industrialization, social and political trends, colonialism and imperialism, key wars, totalitarianism, and globalization. It also considers the origins and impact of such events and developments and how they, along with related belief systems, shaped modern western civilization. Lectures will take most of the class time, though there will be some discussions and small-group exercises. Required Readings: Marvin Perry, Sources of the Western Tradition, Volume II: From the Renaissance to the Present, Ninth Edition (2014). Available in the Bookstore. The History Student's Handbook. Free at hist.ucalgary.ca – click on "Essay Guide" on the left. Optional Reading: Marvin Perry, Western Civilization: A Brief History, Volume II: Since 1600, Eleventh Edition (2016). THIS BOOK IS ON ONE-HOUR RESERVE IN THE LIBRARY. Grading: Document analysis 15% Due February 6 Midterm 25% Two parts: Part one on February 15; part two on February 17 Research Paper 30% Due March 27 Final exam 30% Scheduled by the Registrar Exams: The exams will NOT be open book, but to help you prepare for the exams, I'll post in D2L an information sheet before each exam.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PHILOSOPHES Voltaire Montesquieu Rousseau
    THE PHILOSOPHES Voltaire Montesquieu Rousseau Tuesday, January 21, 2014 Philosophes - public intellectuals dedicated to solving the problems of the World http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxG_d94F3Dg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Xd_zkMEgkI Tuesday, January 21, 2014 Philosophes - public intellectuals dedicated to solving the problems of the World - wrote for a broad, educated public audience http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxG_d94F3Dg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Xd_zkMEgkI Tuesday, January 21, 2014 Philosophes - public intellectuals dedicated to solving the problems of the World - wrote for a broad, educated public audience - fought to eradicate bigotry, religious fanaticism, superstition http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxG_d94F3Dg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Xd_zkMEgkI Tuesday, January 21, 2014 Philosophes - public intellectuals dedicated to solving the problems of the World - wrote for a broad, educated public audience - fought to eradicate bigotry, religious fanaticism, superstition - promoted “Natural Rights” - intellectual freedom, freedom of the press and religion, human progress http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxG_d94F3Dg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Xd_zkMEgkI Tuesday, January 21, 2014 Philosophes - public intellectuals dedicated to solving the problems of the World - wrote for a broad, educated public audience - fought to eradicate bigotry, religious fanaticism, superstition - promoted “Natural Rights” - intellectual freedom, freedom of the press and religion, human progress - spread their ideas through books, essays, letters pamphlets http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxG_d94F3Dg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Xd_zkMEgkI Tuesday, January 21, 2014 PHILOSOPHES Tuesday, January 21, 2014 PHILOSOPHES - Paris was headquarters Tuesday, January 21, 2014 PHILOSOPHES - Paris was headquarters Tuesday, January 21, 2014 PHILOSOPHES - Paris was headquarters - they met in salons and coffee houses to share ideas Tuesday, January 21, 2014 PHILOSOPHES - Paris was headquarters - they met in salons and coffee houses to share ideas -Mme.
    [Show full text]
  • Contraception and the Renaissance of Traditional Marriage
    CHOOSING A LAW TO LIVE BY ONCE THE KING IS GONE INTRODUCTION Law is the expression of the rules by which civilization governs itself, and it must be that in law as elsewhere will be found the fundamental differences of peoples. Here then it may be that we find the underlying cause of the difference between the civil law and the common law.1 By virtue of its origin, the American legal profession has always been influenced by sources of law outside the United States. American law schools teach students the common law, and law students come to understand that the common law is different than the civil law, which is prevalent in Europe.2 Comparative law courses expose law students to the civil law system by comparing American common law with the law of other countries such as France, which has a civil code.3 A closer look at the history of the American and French Revolutions makes one wonder why the legal systems of the two countries are so different. Certainly, the American and French Revolutions were drastically different in some ways. For instance, the French Revolution was notoriously violent during a period known as “the Terror.”4 Accounts of the French revolutionary government executing so many French citizens as well as the creation of the Cult of the Supreme Being5 make the French Revolution a stark contrast to the American Revolution. Despite the differences, the revolutionary French and Americans shared similar goals—liberty and equality for all citizens and an end to tyranny. Both revolutions happened within approximately two decades of each other and were heavily influenced by the Enlightenment.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Name: Enlightenment: the Making of the Modern World Short
    Full Name: Enlightenment: The Making of the Modern World Short Title: Enlightenment Lecturer Name and Email Address: Darrell Jones ([email protected]) ECTS Weighting: 10 Semester Taught: HT Year: JS Content: The term ‘Enlightenment’ simultaneously refers to an historical period, a philosophical project, and a social and political process. The period covered most of the eighteenth century, though scholars disagree about when it began and ended. The project promoted reason, experience, and a secular ‘science of man’ over traditional and institutional sources of moral and intellectual authority, but its proponents were often in conflict with each other as much as with their mutual adversaries. The process established the modern concepts of liberty, equality, and rights, yet recent critics have attacked its initiators as racists, misogynists, and imperialists. Among the major Enlightenment thinkers were John Locke, Voltaire, David Hume, Immanuel Kant, Thomas Paine, and Mary Wollstonecraft. For better or worse, their hopes for human progress and the future of civilization have shaped the contemporary world. This module will facilitate critical engagement with the complex phenomenon of Enlightenment by introducing historical definitions and current theories; exploring and examining central themes and texts; and considering and evaluating controversial issues that continue to influence public debate today. In the spirit of Enlightenment, the module will equip and encourage students to question their assumptions and think for themselves by placing claims to knowledge and power in historical and cultural context. Learning Outcomes: On successful completion of the module a student should be able to: 1. define Enlightenment as an historical, philosophical, and socio-political phenomenon; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • France: the Revolt of Democratic Christianity and the Rise of Public Opinion
    The Enlightenment and religion 4 France: the revolt of democratic Christianity and the rise of public opinion This chapter focuses on the emergence of religious toleration in France and the degree to which it was brought about by broad po- litico-religious struggle rather than by the philosophes.1 The discus- sion will, therefore, not provide the usual Enlightenment studies degree of focus upon the philosophes. Much of the research neces- sary for a revision of the role of the philosophes in France has been accumulating for several decades, but there has not yet been an at- tempt to bring together the various strands and integrate them into a critique of their role. Albeit slowly, from the mid 1960s a revision of the status of Pierre Bayle as a Calvinist fideist (discussed in earlier chapters) rather than an early philosophe has gradually gained ac- ceptance.2 Again rather slowly and mostly from the 1980s, there have been efforts to demonstrate that Christianity occupied a more important place in the development of the French Enlightenment than had hitherto been accepted.3 In particular there has been in- creased recognition of the role of Jansenism, especially in the land- mark suppression of the Jesuits.4 Much of the tale I recount in this chapter is, therefore, already well-known and I am indebted to the research of a number of scholars (some of whom have already been cited in earlier chapters) including R. Barny, C. J. Betts, P. R. Campbell, A. Kors, P. J. Korshin, Elizabeth Labrousse, M. Linton, J. McManners, W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federalist Revolt: an Affirmation Or Denial Ofopular P Sovereignty?
    Butler University Digital Commons @ Butler University Scholarship and Professional Work - LAS College of Liberal Arts & Sciences 9-1992 The Federalist Revolt: An Affirmation or Denial ofopular P Sovereignty? Paul R, Hanson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/facsch_papers Part of the European History Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Hanson, Paul, R."The Federalist Revolt: An Affirmation or Denial of Popular Sovereignty?" French History, vol. 6, no. 3 (September, 1992), 335-355. Available from: digitalcommons.butler.edu/facsch_papers/500/ This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences at Digital Commons @ Butler University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarship and Professional Work - LAS by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Butler University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Monarchist Clubs and the Pamphlet Debate over Political Legitimacy in the Early Years of the French Revolution Paul R. Hanson Paul R. Hanson is professor and chair of history at Butler University. He is currently working on a book- length study of the Federalist revolt of 1793. Research for this article was supported by a summer grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities and by assistance from Butler University. Earlier versions were presented at annual meetings of the Society for French Historical Studies. The author would like to thank Gary Kates, Ken Margerison, Colin Jones, Jeremy Popkin, Michael Kennedy, Jack Censer, Jeffrey Ravel, John Burney, and the anonymous readers for the journal for their helpful comments on various drafts of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • De Sade's Theatrical Passions
    06.puchner 4/19/05 2:28 PM Page 111 Martin Puchner Sade’s Theatrical Passions The Theater of the Revolution The Marquis de Sade entered theater history in 1964 when the Royal Shakespeare Company, under the direction of Peter Brook, presented a play by the unknown author Peter Weiss entitled, The Persecution and Assassination of Jean-Paul Marat as Performed by the Inmates of the Asylum of Charenton Under the Direction of the Marquis de Sade.1 Marat/Sade, as the play is usually called, became an extraordinary success story.2 By com- bining narrators with techniques developed in a multi-year workshop entitled “Theater of Cruelty,” Marat/Sade managed to link the two modernist visionaries of the theater whom everybody had considered to be irreconcilable opposites: Bertolt Brecht and Antonin Artaud. Marat/Sade not only fabricated a new revolutionary theater from the vestiges of modernism, it also coincided with a philosophical and cul- tural revision of the French revolution that had begun with Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer’s The Dialectics of Enlightenment (1944/69) and found a preliminary culmination in Michel Foucault’s History of Madness (1972). At the same time, the revival of Sade was fu- eled by the first complete publication of his work in French (1967) and by Roland Barthes’ landmark study, Sade Fourier Loyola (1971).3 Marat/Sade had thus hit a theatrical and intellectual nerve. Sade, however, belongs to theater history as more than just a char- acter in a play.Little is known about the historical Sade’s life-long pas- sion for the theater, about his work as a theater builder and manager, an actor and director.
    [Show full text]
  • Enlightenment Thinkers and Democratic Government
    1.3 Enlightenment Thinkers and Democratic Government Standard 1.3: Enlightenment Thinkers and Democratic Government Explain the influence of Enlightenment thinkers on the American Revolution and the framework of American government. (Massachusetts Curriculum Framework for History and Social Studies) [8.T1.3] FOCUS QUESTION: How did the Enlightenment Contribute to the Growth of Democratic Principles of Government? Building Democracy for All 1 "British Museum Room 1 Enlightenment" by Mendhak is licensed under CC-BY-SA-2.0 The Enlightenment (or Age of Reason) is the term used to define the outpouring of philosophical, scientific, and political knowledge in Europe at the beginning of the 18th century. European civilization had already experienced the Renaissance (1300-1600) and the Scientific Revolution (1550-1700). The Enlightenment further transformed intellectual and political life based on the application of science to dramatically alter traditional beliefs and practices. Explore our resourcesforhistoryteachers wiki page to learn more about the Main Ideas of Enlightenment Thinkers. Enlightenment thinkers believed that rational reasoning could apply to all forms of human activity. Their writing can be "broadly understood to stand for the claim that all individuals have the right to Building Democracy for All 2 share their own ends for themselves rather than let others do it for them" (Pagden, 2013, p. x). Politically, they asked what was the proper relationship of the citizen to the monarch or the state. They held that society existed as a contract between individuals and some larger political entity. They advanced the idea of freedom and equality before the law. Enlightenment ideas about how governments should be organized and function influenced both the American and French Revolutions.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Revolution a Volume in the DOCUMENTARY HISTORY of WESTERN CIVILIZATION - the French Revolution
    The French Revolution A volume In THE DOCUMENTARY HISTORY of WESTERN CIVILIZATION - The French Revolution Edited by PAUL H. BEIK PALGRA VE MACMILLAN ISBN 978-1-349-00528-4 ISBN 978-1-349-00526-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-00526-0 THE FRENCH REVOLUTION English translation copyright © 1970 by Paul H. Beik Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1970 978-0-333-07911-9 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. First published in the United States 1970 First published in the United Kingdom by The Macmillan Press Ltd. 1971 Published by THE MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Associated companies in New York Toronto Dublin Melbourne Johannesburg and Madras SBN 333 07911 6 Contents Introduction x PART I. CROWN, PARLEMENT, AND ARISTOCRACY 1. November 19, 1787: Chretien Fran~ois de Lamoignon on Principles of the French Monarchy 1 2. April 17, 1788: Louis XVI to a Deputation from the Parlement of Paris 3 3. May 4, 1788: Repeated Remonstrances of the Parlement of Paris in Response to the King's Statement of April 17 5 4. December 12,1788: Memoir of the Princes 10 PART II. THE SURGE OF OPINION 5. January, 1789: Sieyes, What Is the Third Estate? 16 6. February, 1789: Mounier on the Estates General 37 7. March 1, 1789: Parish Cahiers of Ecommoy and Mansigne 45 8. March 14, 1789: Cahier of the Nobility of Crepy 51 9. March 26,1789: Cahier of the Clergy of Troyes 56 PART III.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Cosmopolitans
    BLACK COSMOPOLITANS BLACK COSMOPOLITANS Race, Religion, and Republicanism in an Age of Revolution Christine Levecq university of virginia press Charlottesville and London University of Virginia Press © 2019 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper First published 2019 ISBN 978-0-8139-4218-6 (cloth) ISBN 978-0-8139-4219-3 (e-book) 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data is available for this title. Cover art: Jean-Baptiste Belley. Portrait by Anne Louis Girodet de Roussy- Trioson, 1797, oil on canvas. (Château de Versailles, France) To Steve and Angie CONTENTS Acknowledgments ix Introduction 1 1. Jacobus Capitein and the Radical Possibilities of Calvinism 19 2. Jean- Baptiste Belley and French Republicanism 75 3. John Marrant: From Methodism to Freemasonry 160 Notes 237 Works Cited 263 Index 281 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This book has been ten years in the making. One reason is that I wanted to explore the African diaspora more broadly than I had before, and my knowledge of English, French, and Dutch naturally led me to expand my research to several national contexts. Another is that I wanted this project to be interdisciplinary, combining history and biography with textual criticism. It has been an amazing journey, which was made pos- sible by the many excellent scholars this book relies on. Part of the pleasure in writing this book came from the people and institutions that provided access to both the primary and the second- ary material.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seneca Falls Convention
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Archivo Digital para la Docencia y la Investigación END OF DEGREE PROJECT THE ORIGINS OF WOMEN’S RIGHTS MOVEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES: THE SENECA FALLS CONVENTION Anne Ruiz Ulloa Translation & Interpreting 2018-2019 Supervisor: Jose Mª Portillo Valdés Department of Contemporary History Abstract: In the 19th century, women had very limited or almost inexistent rights. They lived in a male dominated world where they had restricted access to many fields and they were considered to be an ornament of their husband in public life, and as a domestic agent to the interior of the family, as the Spanish contemporary expression ángel del hogar denotes. In the eyes of the law, they were civilly dead. They were considered fragile and delicate, because they were dependent on a man from birth to death. Tired of being considered less than their male companions, a women’s rights movement emerged in the small town of Seneca Falls, New York, in 1848. Women gathered for the first time in history at the Wesleyan Chapel to discuss women’s rights and to find a solution to the denigration they had suffered by men and society during the years. Around 300 people gathered in Seneca Falls, both men and women. As an attempt to amend the wrongs of men, these women created the Declaration of Rights and Sentiments, a document based on the Declaration of Independence, expressing their discontent with how the society had treated them and asking for a change and equal rights, among which there was the right for suffrage.
    [Show full text]