2010-11 Accreditation Program Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2010-11 Accreditation Program Report UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE ______________________________________________________________________________ Architecture Program Report UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE ELIZABETH PLATER-ZYBERK, FAIA Dean and Distinguished Professor Phone: 305.284.5000 Email: [email protected] ROCCO CEO, AIA Director of Undergraduate Studies and Professor Phone: 305.284.2269 Email: [email protected] JEAN-FRANCOIS LEJEUNE, ASSOCIATE AIA Director of Graduate Studies and Professor Phone: 305.284.5258 Email: [email protected] THOMAS J. LEBLANC, PH.D. Executive Vice President and Provost DONNA E. SHALALA, PH.D. President DEGREE PROGRAMS OFFERED: Bachelor of Architecture Master of Architecture ______________________________________________________________________________ Architecture Program Report This page intentionally left blank. 2 | Page University of Miami | SOA | APR 2010 Table of Contents PART ONE: SECTION 1 – IDENTITY & SELF-ASSESSMENT ................................................................... 1 I.1.1 HISTORY AND MISSION: ....................................................................................................................... 1 I.1.2 LEARNING CULTURE AND SOCIAL EQUITY: ........................................................................................... 8 I.1.3 RESPONSE TO THE FIVE PERSPECTIVES: ............................................................................................ 10 I.1.4 LONG-RANGE PLANNING: .................................................................................................................. 17 I.1.5 SELF-ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES: .................................................................................................... 21 PART ONE: SECTION 2 – RESOURCES .................................................................................................... 27 I.2.1 HUMAN RESOURCES AND HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................. 27 I.2.2 ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE AND GOVERNANCE ............................................................................... 47 I.2.3 PHYSICAL RESOURCES ..................................................................................................................... 52 I.2.4 FINANCIAL RESOURCES .................................................................................................................... 57 I.2.5 INFORMATION RESOURCES ................................................................................................................ 61 PART ONE: SECTION 3 - INSTITUTIONAL AND PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS ............................... 67 I.3.1 STATISTICAL REPORTS ...................................................................................................................... 67 I.3.2 ANNUAL REPORTS ............................................................................................................................ 76 I.3.3 FACULTY CREDENTIALS .................................................................................................................... 99 PART ONE: SECTION 4 – POLICY REVEW ............................................................................................. 118 I.4 POLICY REVIEW ................................................................................................................................. 118 PART TWO: SECTION 1 - STUDENT PERFORMANCE -- EDUCATIONAL REALMS & STUDENT PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ....................................................................................................................... 119 II.1.1 STUDENT PERFORMANCE CRITERIA ................................................................................................ 119 PART TWO: SECTION 2 - CURRICULAR FRAMEWORK ....................................................................... 125 II.2.1 REGIONAL ACCREDITATION ............................................................................................................ 125 II.2.2 PROFESSIONAL DEGREE AND CURRICULUM .................................................................................... 128 II.2.3 CURRICULUM REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................... 139 PART TWO: SECTION 3 - EVALUATION OF PREPARATORY / PRE-PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION ....................................................................................................................................................................... 140 PART TWO: SECTION 4 - PUBLIC INFORMATION ................................................................................. 142 II.4.1 STATEMENT OF NAAB-ACCREDITED DEGREES ............................................................................... 142 II.4.2 ACCESS TO NAAB CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURES ........................................................................ 142 II.4.3 ACCESS TO CAREER DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION ......................................................................... 142 II.4.5 ARE PASS RATES ......................................................................................................................... 143 PART THREE: – PROGRESS SINCE THE LAST SITE VISIT .................................................................. 144 III.1 SUMMARY OF RESPONSES TO TEAM FINDINGS (2004 VISIT) .............................................................. 144 III.1.1 RESPONSES TO CONDITIONS NOT MET: ........................................................................................... 144 III.1.2 RESPONSES TO CAUSES OF CONCERN: .......................................................................................... 144 III.2 SUMMARY OF RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN THE NAAB CONDITION .................................................... 144 PART FOUR: SECTION 1 – COURSE DESCRIPTIONS .............................................................................. 1 IV.1 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS: ...................................................................................................................... 1 PART FOUR: SECTION 2 – FACULTY RESUMES ...................................................................................... 1 IV.2 FACULTY RESUMES: ............................................................................................................................ 1 PART FOUR: SECTION 3 – VISITING TEAM REPORT (VTR) FROM PREVIOUS VISIT ......................... 1 IV.3 VISITING TEAM REPORT (VTR) FROM PREVIOUS VISIT: ......................................................................... 1 PART FOUR: SECTION 4 – CATALOGS ...................................................................................................... 1 1 | Page IV.4 CATALOGS: ......................................................................................................................................... 1 APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................................. 1 APPENDIX A: STUDIO CULTURE POLICY ................................................................................................. 1 APPENDIX B: SCHOOL OF ACHITECTURE STRATEGIC PLAN – 2007 ......................................................... 1 APPENDIX C: SCHOOL OF ACHITECTURE STRATEGIC PLAN – 2010 ......................................................... 1 APPENDIX D: STUDENT EVALUATION FORM – OLD VERSION ................................................................... 1 APPENDIX E: STUDENT EVALUATION FORM – NEW VERSION ................................................................... 1 APPENDIX F: SACS ASSESSMENT FORM ............................................................................................... 1 APPENDIX G: SOA FACULTY COMITTEES ROSTER .................................................................................. 1 APPENDIX H: ROME FACILITY .............................................................. ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. APPENDIX I: SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE – CRITERIA FOR PROMOTION, TENURE & REAPPOINTMENT ...... 1 This report was prepared according to the 2009 Conditions for Accreditation and the 2010 Procedures for Accreditation. The University Of Miami School Of Architecture was last reviewed in 2005 then under the 1998 Procedures for Accreditation. 2 | Page University of Miami | SOA | APR 2010 PART ONE PART ONE: SECTION 1 – IDENTITY & SELF-ASSESSMENT I.1.1 History and Mission: The APR must include the following: ● A brief history of the institution, its mission, founding principles, and a description of how that is expressed in the context of 21st century higher education ● A brief history of the program, its mission, founding principles, and a description of how that is expressed in the context of the 21st century architecture education. ● A description of the activities and initiatives that demonstrate the program’s benefit to the institution through discovery, teaching, engagement, and service. Conversely, the APR should also include a description of the benefits derived to the program from the institutional setting. ● A description of the program and how its course of study encourages the holistic development of young professionals through both liberal arts and practicum-based learning. History of the University and its position in context of 21st Century Higher Education When George Merrick dreamt of a great tropical city, he dreamt also of a great university. Merrick described in the promotional material of Coral Gables, a city of tropical splendor whose Edenic gardens would inspire
Recommended publications
  • Prospectus 2006.1.Indd
    I•N•T•B•A•U International Network for Traditional Building, Architecture & Urbanism Patron: His royal highness THE PRINCE OF WALES P ro s p e c t u s Dr Matthew Hardy • Aura Neag London • May 2006 Produced by Dr Matthew Hardy and Aura Neag for the International Network for Traditional Building Architecture & Urbanism © INTBAU 2006 all rights reserved # Contents Char ter A personal message from our Patron, His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales 1. Introduction 1.1 INTBAU 1.2 Need for INTBAU 1.3 Support for INTBAU 1.4 Charter 1.5 Committee of Honour 1.6 Chapters 1.7 Patron 1.8 Income 2. Membership 2.1 General Membership 2.2 Higher Membership 2.3 INTBAU College of Traditional Practitioners ICTP 3. Activities 4. Recent projects 5. Future projects 6. How you can support INTBAU 7. Appendices 7.1 Organisational structure diagrams 7.2 Members of Board 7.3 Members of Committee of Honour 7.4 Members of Management Committee 3 Charter The International Network for Traditional Building, Architecture and Urbanism is an active network of individuals and institutions dedicated to the creation of humane and harmonious buildings and places that respect local traditions. • • • • • Traditions allow us to recognise the lessons of history, enrich our lives and offer our inheritance to the future. Local, regional and national traditions provide the opportunity for communities to retain their individuality with the advance of globalisation. Through tradition we can preserve our sense of identity and counteract social alienation. People must have the freedom to maintain their traditions. Traditional buildings and places maintain a balance with nature and society that has been developed over many generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Adam 2017 Laureate
    Robert Adam 2017 Laureate Contents Press Release ……………………………………………………………… 2 Images …………………………………………………………………….. 4 Driehaus Prize ……………………………………………………………. 13 Ceremony Choregic Monument Past Laureates Henry Hope Reed Award …………………………………………………. 14 Medal Past Recipients Jury ……………………………………………………………………….. 15 Press Release Robert Adam named 15th Richard H. Driehaus Prize Laureate James S. Ackerman posthumously presented the Henry Hope Reed Award Robert Adam, an architect known for his scholarship as well as his practice, has been named the recipient of the 2017 Richard H. Driehaus Prize at the University of Notre Dame. Adam, the 15th Driehaus Prize laureate, will be awarded the $200,000 prize and a bronze miniature of the Choregic Monument of Lysikrates during a ceremony on March 25 (Saturday) in Chicago. In conjunction with the Driehaus Prize, the $50,000 Henry Hope Reed Award, given annually to an individual working outside the practice of architecture who has supported the cultivation of the traditional city, its architecture and art, will be presented posthumously to architectural historian James S. Ackerman. Additionally, on the occasion of the 15th anniversary of the Driehaus Prize, the jury has elected to honor the Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU) with a special award for contributions to the public realm. “Throughout his career, Robert Adam has engaged the critical issues of our time, challenging contemporary attitudes toward architecture and urban design. He has written extensively on the tensions between globalism and regionalism as we shape our built environment,” said Michael Lykoudis, Driehaus Prize jury chair and Francis and Kathleen Rooney Dean of Notre Dame’s School of Architecture. “Sustainability is at the foundation of his work, achieved through urbanism and architecture that is respectful of local climate, culture and building customs.” Adam received his architectural education at Westminster University and was a Rome Scholar in 1972–73.
    [Show full text]
  • Premios Richard H. Driehaus Y Becas Donald Gray De Las Artes De La Construcción Richard H
    EXPOSICIÓN EXHIBITION Las tradiciones constructivas, con su mayor respeto por el medioambiente y Building traditions, which pursue a greater respect for the environment and its sus recursos naturales, ofrecen soluciones para algunos de los principales natural resources, respond to some of the main challenges we face in our time, retos de nuestro tiempo, tales como la desaparición progresiva de las oportu- such as the progressive disappearance of quality job opportunities, the grow- nidades de empleo de calidad, la creciente generación de residuos y entornos ing generation of waste and toxic environments, the dissolution of the kind of tóxicos, la disolución del tipo de espacios públicos que están diseñados para public spaces which are designed to favour interchange and coexistence, the favorecer el intercambio y la convivencia, el desequilibrio que sufre el medio unbalance the rural areas are suffering, or the persistence of planning practic- rural o la persistencia de prácticas de planeamiento que conducen a una ma- es which lead to a serious dependence on private transport. yor dependencia del transporte privado. In order to recover the lost balance it is essential to keep this knowledge alive, Mantener vivos estos conocimientos, tomarlos como referencia para la cons- to use it as a reference for the practice of 21st century building, architecture trucción, la arquitectura y el urbanismo del siglo XXI, adecuarlos a los reque- and urbanism, to adapt it to the needs of our time, and to learn the many les- rimientos de nuestro tiempo y extraer de ellos cuantas lecciones siguen ofre- sons it keeps offering for the way we design and transform our environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoja De Sala Y Programa De Actividades
    EXPOSICIÓN EXHIBITION Las tradiciones constructivas, con su mayor respeto por el medioambiente y Building traditions, with their greater respect for the environment and its nat- sus recursos naturales, ofrecen soluciones para algunos de los principales ural resources, respond to some of the biggest challenges of our time, such retos de nuestro tiempo, tales como la desaparición progresiva de las oportu- as the progressive loss of quality employment, the proliferation of waste and nidades de empleo de calidad, la creciente generación de residuos y entornos toxic environments, the erosion of public spaces of the sort designed to favour tóxicos, la disolución del tipo de espacios públicos que están diseñados para exchange and coexistence, the urban/rural divide, or persistent planning prac- favorecer el intercambio y la convivencia, el desequilibrio que sufre el medio tices leading to greater dependence on private transport. rural o la persistencia de prácticas de planeamiento que conducen a una ma- yor dependencia del transporte privado. Keeping traditional expertise alive, taking it as a benchmark for the building, ar- chitecture and urbanism of the 21st century and drawing from it all the lessons Mantener vivos estos conocimientos, tomarlos como referencia para la cons- that it offers for how we can design and transform our environment today is trucción, la arquitectura y el urbanismo del siglo XXI, adecuarlos a los reque- essential to restoring the lost balance. rimientos de nuestro tiempo y extraer de ellos cuantas lecciones siguen ofre- ciendo para la manera en la que diseñamos y transformamos nuestro entorno This exhibition presents a selection of building materials, techniques and resulta ineludible para avanzar hacia la recuperación del equilibrio perdido.
    [Show full text]
  • Arquitectura E Identidad Local Architecture and Local Identity
    Arquitectura e Identidad Local Architecture and Local Identity Mairea Libros Seminario Internacional International Seminar Arquitectura e Identidad Local Architecture and Local Identity Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid (ETSAM) 23 y 24 de Octubre de 2014 Organizado, gracias a la generosidad de Richard H. Driehaus, por el Premio Rafael Manzano Martos de Arquitectura Clásica y Restauración de Monumentos y la School of Architecture of the Notre Dame University, con la participación de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid y la colaboración del Centro de Investigación de Arquitectura Tradicional (CIAT) y de INTBAU España. Edición a cargo de Alejandro García Hermida Mairea Libros Editado por: Alejandro García Hermida Diseño: Helena García Hermida © De los textos sus autores © De esta edición, Mairea Libros 2014 Mairea Libros Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura Avenida Juan de Herrera, 4. 28040 MADRID Correo electrónico: [email protected] Internet: www.mairea-libros.com ISBN: 978-84-943132-3-3 Depósito Legal: M-29351-2014 Cualquier forma de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública o transforma- ción de esta obra sólo puede ser realizada con la autorización de sus titulares, salvo excepción prevista por la Ley 23/2006 de Propiedad Intelectual, y en concreto por su artículo 32, sobre “cita e ilustración de la enseñanza”. Impresión: StockCeroDayton San Romualdo, 26 28037 Madrid Impreso en España – Printed in Spain Agradecimientos Acknowledgements Alejandro García Hermida Este libro y este seminario han sido posibles gracias a la ayuda y el apoyo de numerosas personas e instituciones. Primeramente, a Richard H. Driehaus, sin cuya generosidad nada de esto sería posible y cuya visión y dedicación están contribuyendo de manera incalculable a la búsqueda de modelos más humanos y sostenibles para la práctica de la arqui- tectura, el urbanismo y la preservación de nuestro patrimonio cultural en su más amplio sentido.
    [Show full text]
  • Arquitectura Y Creación De Lugares.Indd
    Arquitectura y Creación de Lugares Arquitectura e Criação de Lugares Architecture and Place Making Seminario Internacional Seminário Internacional International Seminar Arquitectura y Creación de Lugares Arquitectura e Criação de Lugares Architecture and Place Making Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid (ETSAM) 7 y 8 de Noviembre de 2017 Ha sido organizado por INTBAU (International Network for Traditional Building, Architecture and Urbanism) y el Premio Rafael Manzano de Nueva Arquitectura Tradicional, gracias al apoyo del Richard H. Driehaus Charitable Lead Trust, mediante una beca del Chicago Community Trust, con la colaboración de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, la Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, la Escola Superior Gallaecia, la Fundação Serra Henriques y el Centro de Investigación de Arquitectura Tradicional (CIAT). Editor y coordinador: Alejandro García Hermida Editor y coordinador: Alejandro García Hermida Con la colaboración de: Rebeca Gómez-Gordo Villa Incluye el ensayo “Brexit to Eupolis”, de Leon Krier (versión revisada de un artículo publicado originalmente en BD VII, 2016, y en CATO, 2017), y textos de: Ruth M. Equipaje, Rino D. Fernández, Leopoldo Gil Cornet, Frank Martínez, Christopher Miller, Lucien Steil, Rafael Manzano Martos, Mieke Bosse from SCALA Architecten, Aritz Díez Oronoz e Imanol Iparraguirre, Juan Moya y Sara Lobón, Robert Adam, Stefanos Polyzoides, Manalee Nanavati, Marcel Vellinga, Enrique Rabasa, Forja Tiznajo, Luis Prieto, David Rivera, Mariana Correia, Ken de Cooman from BC architects & studies, Léon Krier, José Baganha y Alejandro García Hermida. Diseño y maquetación: Helena García Hermida Traducción al inglés: Venice Wyatt Traducción al portugués: Vítor Vasconcelos © De los textos e imágenes, sus autores © De esta edición, Arcadia Mediática 2017 Arcadia Mediática Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura Avenida Juan de Herrera, 4.
    [Show full text]
  • ND Global Fall 2009 the European Edition Volume 4
    ND Global Fall 2009 The European Edition Volume 4 An official publication of University of Notre Dame alumni in Europe Strengthening the ND Community Abroad reetings! I am very happy to have European cities. What is an ASC, you may the opportunity to serve as regional ask? Read page 2 to find out! Gdirector for Europe on the Notre We now have contacts in 35 European Dame Alumni Association Board. As one countries, eager to be of assistance to alumni, of three international regional directors, parents and friends who may be traveling or my mission is to support international moving to their country, including Ramon Notre Dame in a way that benefits ND Llados-Bernaus ’95, ’98 Ph.D. who is delighted stakeholders—especially alumni—across to be the alumni contact for Andorra. “I Europe who I represent enthusiastically believe I’m the only Andorran citizen who has (you!), and to promote an engaged Notre ever graduated from ND!” he says. Dame family worldwide. I hope you can be an I encourage you to seek out ways to become active part of this, too. involved in your ND club. The more we I am excited to offer you this issue of ND become involved and represent ND around Global: The European Edition, packed full of the world, the stronger our alumni network resources and information on ways that you will be. Does your company have internship can get more involved. opportunities or job openings that may be First, make sure your contact information of interest to alumni or current students? If is up-to-date with the University on Irish so, please let us know.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuovo Classicismo: L'architettura Come Senso Di Appartenenza
    Nuovo classicismo: l’architettura come senso di appartenenza Nuovo classicismo: l’architettura come senso di appartenenzadi Giuseppe Baiocchi e Liliane Jessica Tami del 28/02/2019 L’architettura post-moderna detiene oramai, dagli anni sessanta del Novecento, un primato incontrastato sia all’interno delle Accademie Universitarie, sia nel primato delle costruzioni. Nonostante tale indirizzo dottrinale sia molto marcato, timidamente, con quieta grandezza e sobria eleganza, diversi architetti hanno riscoperto le forme e le armonie dell’architettura classica e revivalista.I più importanti teorici del nuovo stile architettonico, denominato Neourbanesimo e Nuovo Classicismo, sono Pier Carlo Bontempi (1954), Quinlan Terry (1937) e Léon Krier (1946), quest’ultimo architetto di fiducia del principe di Galles Charles Philip Arthur George Mountbatten-Windsor (1948). Nella foto da sinistra a destra: Pier Carlo Bontempi (Fornovo di Taro, 1954) è un architetto italiano, esponente del Neourbanesimo e del Nuovo classicismo. Egli pone una particolare enfasi in merito al contesto urbano e alla continuità con le tradizioni architettoniche; John Quinlan Terry CBE (24 luglio 1937 a Hampstead) è un architetto britannico. È stato educato alla Bryanston School e alla Architectural Association . Era un allievo dell’architetto Raymond Erith , con il quale ha formato la partnership Erith & Terry; Léon Krier (7 aprile 1946) è un architetto lussemburghese , teorico dell’architettura e urbanista , il primo e più importante critico del Modernismo architettonico e fautore di New Traditional Architecture e New Urbanism . In un’epoca svuotata dall’elemento del sacro, dal modesto studio dei luoghi e da una approssimativa progettazione in moduli, il gusto irrazionale è arrivato ad erigere il brutalismo e il parametrismo.
    [Show full text]
  • Portraits in Architecture
    Portraits in Architecture Episode Guide #101: Tom Beeby Chicago-based architect Tom Beeby is one of the great participants in the American post- modernist architectural saga, contributing a bold edifice with the Harold Washington Public Library in Chicago. Beeby’s work includes public structures like libraries, museums, and theaters. #102: Pier Carlo Bontempi Pier Carlo Bontempi is a Parma-based architect who is subtly exploring the vernacular forms of northern Italy. For fine art Italian publisher France Maria Ricci Bontempi built a pyramid and a labyrinth to house his library. #103: David M. Schwarz David M. Schwarz has a busy office in Washington, D.C. that designs sports facilities, concert halls and shopping centers around the country. But his most significant work was revitalizing the downtown of Ft. Worth, Texas. With the largesse of Ft. Worth native and philanthropist Ed Bass, Schwarz designed and built dozens of new buildings over decades, including a stunning European style concert hall and a public square, bringing walkable urbanism to car-crazy Texas. #104: Scott Merrill Scott Merrill was an early participant in the New Urbanist town of Seaside, Florida, a small resort town in the Panhandle that marked the beginning of a radical new way of building towns and neighborhoods. Merrill's work blends the ideals of New Urbanism with a sensitivity to American vernacular structures and thoughtful land use that is uniquely of his state. APT WORLDWIDE * 55 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02110, USA [email protected] * [email protected] * [email protected] APTWW.ORG #105: Robert Adam Winchester-based Robert Adam designs country homes, multi-home developments and major business districts across the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • EAHN 6Th International Meeting Conference Proceedings 2
    EAHN 6th International Meeting Conference Proceedings 2 Credits Scientific Committee Organising Committee Richard Williams Richard Anderson University of Edinburgh University of Edinburgh Richard Anderson Richard Williams University of Edinburgh University of Edinburgh Mark Crinson Alex Bremner University of London University of Edinburgh Jorge Correia Peter Clericuzio University of Minho University of Edinburgh Andres Kurg Alistair Fair Estonian Academy of Arts University of Edinburgh Ola Uduku Clive Fenton Manchester Metropolitan University Docomomo Scotland Kathleen James-Chakraborty Tessa Giblin University College Dublin University of Edinburgh Matteo Burioni Miles Glendinning Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München University of Edinburgh Sabine Frommel John Lowrey Sorbonne University of Edinburgh Elizabeth Petcu University of Edinburgh Margaret Stewart University of Edinburgh Diane Watters Historic Environment Scotland 3 Contents Preface 5 Sessions and Papers 6 Parallel Papers 01 22 Parallel Papers 02 82 Parallel Papers 03 136 Parallel Papers 04 202 Parallel Papers 05 224 Index of Names 281 Acknowledgements 284 4 5 Preface The publication you are reading is a record of the EAHN2021 International Conference, hosted by the University of Edinburgh. The abstracts and papers included in this publication offer a perspective on the themes and questions that are driving architectural history today. The labour that has contributed to this event by the scientific and organising committees, session chairs, speakers, and support staff has been
    [Show full text]
  • La Reconstrucción Del Patrimonio Cultural a Reconstrução Do Património Cultural the Reconstruction of Cultural Heritage
    La Reconstrucción del Patrimonio Cultural A Reconstrução do Património Cultural The Reconstruction of Cultural Heritage Seminario Internacional Seminário Internacional International Seminar La Reconstrucción del Patrimonio Cultural A Reconstrução do Património Cultural The Reconstruction of Cultural Heritage Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid (ETSAM) 7 y 8 de Noviembre de 2018 Ha sido organizado por INTBAU y el Premio Rafael Manzano de Nueva Arquitectura Tradicional, gracias al apoyo del Richard H. Driehaus Charitable Lead Trust, mediante una donación a la Chicago Community Foundation para el Richard H. Driehaus Charitable Fund, con la colaboración de la Fundación EKABA (Espacio de KAlam para las Bellas Artes), la Fundação Serra Henriques, la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, la Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, la Escola Superior Gallaecia y el Centro de Investigación de Arquitectura Tradicional (CIAT), y forma parte de las celebraciones del Año Europeo del Patrimonio Cultural. Editor y coordinador: Alejandro García Hermida Con la colaboración de: Rebeca Gómez-Gordo Villa Editor y coordinador: Alejandro García Hermida Con la colaboración de: Rebeca Gómez-Gordo Villa Incluye textos de: Ruth M. Equipaje, Douglas Duany, Alejandro García Hermida, Rebeca Gómez-Gordo Villa, Frank Martínez, Christopher C. Miller, Léon Krier, Juan de Dios de la Hoz, Rafael Manzano Martos, Aritz Díez Oronoz e Imanol Iparraguirre, Abelardo Linares del Castillo Valero y Elena Jiménez Sánchez, Estefanía Fernández-Cid Fernández-Viña, Xavier Espinós Bermejo, Lucía Espinós Bermejo y Rodrigo Toro Sánchez, Stefanos Polyzoides, Antonio Maria Braga y Alberto Castro Nunes, Fernando Vela Cossío, Ricardo Cambas y Agustín Castellanos, Valeriano Jaurrieta, Marjorie Hunt, Tomasz Jeleński, Leopoldo Gil Cornet, David Rivera, Jesús García Calderón y Manolis Korres.
    [Show full text]
  • ND Global Fall 2009 the European Edition Volume 4
    ND Global Fall 2009 The European Edition Volume 4 An official publication of University of Notre Dame alumni in Europe Strengthening the ND Community Abroad reetings! I am very happy to have European cities. What is an ASC, you may the opportunity to serve as regional ask? Read page 2 to find out! Gdirector for Europe on the Notre We now have contacts in 35 European Dame Alumni Association Board. As one countries, eager to be of assistance to alumni, of three international regional directors, parents and friends who may be traveling or my mission is to support international moving to their country, including Ramon Notre Dame in a way that benefits ND Llados-Bernaus ’95, ’98 Ph.D. who is delighted stakeholders—especially alumni—across to be the alumni contact for Andorra. “I Europe who I represent enthusiastically believe I’m the only Andorran citizen who has (you!), and to promote an engaged Notre ever graduated from ND!” he says. Dame family worldwide. I hope you can be an I encourage you to seek out ways to become active part of this, too. involved in your ND club. The more we I am excited to offer you this issue of ND become involved and represent ND around Global: The European Edition, packed full of the world, the stronger our alumni network resources and information on ways that you will be. Does your company have internship can get more involved. opportunities or job openings that may be First, make sure your contact information of interest to alumni or current students? If is up-to-date with the University on Irish so, please let us know.
    [Show full text]