Workers and Intelligentsia in Late Imperial Russia: Realities, Representations, Reflections

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Workers and Intelligentsia in Late Imperial Russia: Realities, Representations, Reflections Workers and Intelligentsia in Late Imperial Russia: Realities, Representations, Reflections Edited by Reginald E. Zelnik Description: The collapse of the Soviet Union opened previously unimagined possibilities for insight into Russian social, intellectual, and political history. This volume, a collaboration of American, Russian, and West European scholars, illuminates the creation and complex dynamics of the Russian industrial working class from its peasant origins in the mid-nineteenth century to the collapse of the imperial system in 1917. The authors focus on the shifting attitudes, cultural norms, self-representations, and increasing self-consciousness of workers as they interacted with the new social movements, student groups, the Church, and most dramatically, the political (mainly radical and liberal) intelligentsia. But the authors also examine the obverse: the contending representations of workers by the intelligentsia as they interacted with each other ever more intensely during this turbulent period leading up to the Russian Revolution. The result is a fascinating and detailed account of social and cultural transformation in a key period of Russian — and world — history. RESEARCH SERIES / NUMBER 101 WORKERS AND INTELLIGENTSIA IN LATE IMPERIAL RUSSIA: REALITIES, REPRESENTATIONS, REFLECTIONS REGINALD E. ZELNIK, EDITOR UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY Three of the essays in this book have been published in somewhat different forms as journal articles. The essay by S. A. Smith first appeared (as part of a larger study of St. Petersburg and Shanghai) in International Review of Social History 41 (1996). The essay by William G. Rosenberg first appeared in Slavic Review 55 (1997). The essay by E. Anthony Swift first appeared in Russian History/Histoire Russe 23 (1996). I am grateful to the publishers of each of these journals for permission to use a version of each essay here. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Workers and intelligentsia in late Imperial Russia : realities, repre- sentations, reflections / Reginald E. Zelnik, Editor. p. cm. — (Research Series ; 101) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-87725-001-4 1. Working class—Russia—History. 2. Labor movement—Russia— History. 3. Intellectuals—Russia—History. 4. Populism—Russia— History. 5. Russia—Social conditions—1801–1917. 6. Russia—Intel- lectual life—1801–1917. I. Zelnik, Reginald E. II. Series: Research series (University of California, Berkeley. International and Area Studies) ; no. 101. HD8526.W59 1998 305.5’62’0947—dc21 98-51074 CIP ©1998 by The Regents of the University of California Printed in the United States of America Dedicated to the memory of Allan K. Wildman, who taught us all so much about workers and intelligentsia CONTENTS Acknowledgments ix Frequently Used Abbreviations and Russian Terms xi Introduction Reginald E. Zelnik 1 Workers and Intelligentsia in the 1870s: The Politics of Sociability Reginald E. Zelnik 16 Narodnaia Volia and the Worker Deborah L. Pearl 55 The Mentality of the Workers of Russia at the Turn of the Twentieth Century Iurii I. Kir’ianov 76 Petersburg Workers and the Intelligentsia on the Eve of the Revolution of 1905–7: The Assembly of Russian Factory and Mill Workers of the City of St. Petersburg Sergei I. Potolov 102 The Petersburg Workers’ Organization and the Politics of “Economism,” 1900–1903 Gerald D. Surh 116 Russian Workers’ Political and Social Identities: The Role of Social Representations in the Interaction between Members of the Labor Movement and the Social Democratic Intelligentsia Leopold H. Haimson 145 vii viii Contents The Relationship between the Intelligentsia and Workers: 172 The Case of the Party Schools in Capri and Bologna Jutta Scherrer Workers, the Intelligentsia, and Social Democracy in St. Petersburg, 1895–1917 S. A. Smith 186 The Socialist Revolutionary Party of Russia and the Workers, 1900–1914 Manfred Hildermeier 206 Representing Workers and the Liberal Narrative of Modernity William G. Rosenberg 228 Workers’ Theater and “Proletarian Culture” in Prerevolutionary Russia, 1905–17 E. Anthony Swift 260 When the Word Was the Deed: Workers vs. Employers before the Justices of the Peace Joan Neuberger 292 The Injured and Insurgent Self: The Moral Imagination of Russia’s Lower-Class Writers Mark Steinberg 309 Patriots or Proletarians? Russian Workers and the First World War Hubertus F. Jahn 330 Notes on Contributors 349 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the many friends and colleagues who helped bring this volume to fruition. It should go without saying that I am particularly grateful to the authors of the various papers pre- sented here. No less important to the success of the conference on which this book is based, however, were the presenters of the many fine papers we were unable to include and the hard-working and perceptive commentators, all of whom are mentioned by name in the Introduction. That conference, in turn, received its principal support from IREX (the International Research and Exchanges Commission), as well as indispensable backing from the University of California at Berkeley (the Center for Slavic and East European Studies and De- partment of History), Columbia University’s Harriman Institute, and the Maison des Sciences de l’Homme Paris). In 1997, the confer- ence proceedings, splendidly edited by Sergei Potolov and his edi- torial board (listed by name in note 2 of my Introduction), were published in Russian by BLITZ (or “BLITs,” the Russian-Baltic Infor- mation Center); the existence of that volume significantly facilitated my task in preparing the present volume for publication. In this connection, I offer my special thanks to BLITZ’s U.S. representative, W. Edward Newt. I am very grateful to the University of California’s International and Area Studies for encouraging this project. More specifically, I wish to thank David Szanton, IAS’s Executive Director, who re- sponded enthusiastically to the idea from the very outset; Senior Editor Bojana Ristich, whose careful, critical reading of the text and high-level professionalism saved me from countless errors; and Stephen Pitcher and Lisa Bryant for their very sound advice on sev- eral important matters. My thanks as well to those who assisted so ably with the trans- lations of the Russian and German texts. D’Ann Penner worked very hard and very well on the translations from Russian of the articles by Iurii Kir’ianov, Serge Potolov, and Leopold Haimson and was ably assisted (with the Haimson article) by Lisa Walker; Victoria Frede ix x Acknowledgments prepared a fine translation from the German of the article by Jutta Scherrer. In all cases, however, responsibility for any shortcomings in the final versions of the translations is my own. Finally, I wish to thank Daniel Orlovsky, Alexander and Dorothy Vucinich, and Elaine Zelnik for their sound advice, moral support, and admirable pa- tience throughout my preparation of this volume. FREQUENTLY USED ABBREVIATIONS AND RUSSIAN TERMS DP Departament Politsii (Department of Police [of the MVD]). GARF Gosudarstvennyi Arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii (State Ar- chive of the Russian Federation)—in Moscow. Intelligent A member of the intelligentsia (plural: intelligenty). IRTO Imperatorskoe Russkoe Tekhnicheskoe Obshchestvo (Im- perial Russian Technical Society). Kruzhok A circle of ideologically related intelligenty and/or work- ers (plural: kruzhki). MVD Ministerstvo Vnutrennikh Del (Ministry of Internal Af- fairs). Narod The people, the folk. PSR Partiia Sotsialistov-Revoliutsionerov (Socialist Revolu- tionary Party). See also “SR.” PSS Polnoe Sobranie Sochinenii (Complete Collected Works). RGIA Rossiiskii Gosudarstvennyi Istoricheskii Arkhiv (Russian State Historical Archive)—in St. Petersburg. RGALI Rossiiskii Gosudarstvennyi Arkhiv Literatury i Iskus- stva—in Moscow. RSDRP Rossiiskaia Sotsial-Demokraticheskaia Rabochaia Partiia (Russian Social-Democratic Workers’ Party). See also “SD.” SD Sotsial Demokrat (Social Democrat), sometimes hyphen- ated, especially when used as an adjective. SR Sotsialist Revoliutsioner (Socialist Revolutionary), some- times hyphenated, especially when used as an adjective. Other abbreviations used in archival citations: f. = fond; op. = opis’; d. = delo; dd. = dela; d-vo = deloproizvodstvo; l. = list; ll. = listy; t. = tom; ch. = chast’; OO = Osobyi Otdel; ob. = oborot. xi INTRODUCTION Reginald E. Zelnik This volume is composed of a selection of papers presented at the International Colloquium on Workers and the Intelligentsia in Russia in the Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries. The conference, which was organized by the St. Petersburg branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences’ Institute of Russian History in coop- eration with several other institutions, including the University of California at Berkeley, was held in St. Petersburg, Russia, from 12 to 16 June 1995.1 The basic assumption of the organizers was that the history of the Russian working class, far from disappearing from the radar screen as a result of the collapse of the regime that claimed to represent it, was still a very vital topic, open to creative new ap- proaches and enrichment, thanks in part to the contacts and ex- changes between Western and Russian scholars that had become so much easier to pursue. Now that a self-described but largely mythi- cal “workers’ state” no longer existed, a full-scale, open-ended effort to study real workers could finally take place, and it did. The conference, I believe, proved its organizers right. Fresh and creative
Recommended publications
  • Lithuanian Synagogues: from the First Descriptions to Systematic Research
    arts Article Lithuanian Synagogues: From the First Descriptions to Systematic Research Vilma Gradinskaite Independent scholar, 05224 Vilnius, Lithuania; [email protected] Received: 4 March 2020; Accepted: 15 May 2020; Published: 21 May 2020 Abstract: The article presents an analysis of the development stages of synagogue research methodology in Lithuania during the four major historical periods of the country—Lithuania in the Russian Empire (1795–1918), Vilnius Region in the interwar period and the independent Republic of Lithuania (1918–1940), the Soviet period (1940–1990), and the independent Republic of Lithuania restored in 1990. Each chapter of the article deals with the issues of synagogue research, heritage conservation and management, while the part about the restored independent Republic of Lithuania and modern days includes topical issues related to synagogue restoration, commemoration and putting them into operation. The study uses two different sources: archival materials and publications. Written sources and publications are reviewed in chronological order and start from the end of the 18th century. The study employs several research methods—the historical descriptive method, the comparative method and the analysis method. Keywords: Lithuania; synagogues; conservation; restoration; renovation; rebuilding; management; commemoration 1. Introduction The article presents several fields of study: (1) a review of the first descriptions of synagogues in Lithuania; (2) an analysis of the development stages of synagogue research methodology in Lithuania; and (3) a brief reference to synagogue restoration, renovation, rebuilding, commemoration and putting into operation—topics which are currently particularly live in Lithuania today. It is not possible to understand the existing trends in synagogue research in Lithuania without considering the country’s past—the times of the Russian Empire, the interwar period and the Soviet period.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversations with Stalin on Questions of Political Economy”
    WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS Lee H. Hamilton, Conversations with Stalin on Christian Ostermann, Director Director Questions of Political Economy BOARD OF TRUSTEES: ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Joseph A. Cari, Jr., by Chairman William Taubman Steven Alan Bennett, Ethan Pollock (Amherst College) Vice Chairman Chairman Working Paper No. 33 PUBLIC MEMBERS Michael Beschloss The Secretary of State (Historian, Author) Colin Powell; The Librarian of Congress James H. Billington James H. Billington; (Librarian of Congress) The Archivist of the United States John W. Carlin; Warren I. Cohen The Chairman of the (University of Maryland- National Endowment Baltimore) for the Humanities Bruce Cole; The Secretary of the John Lewis Gaddis Smithsonian Institution (Yale University) Lawrence M. Small; The Secretary of Education James Hershberg Roderick R. Paige; (The George Washington The Secretary of Health University) & Human Services Tommy G. Thompson; Washington, D.C. Samuel F. Wells, Jr. PRIVATE MEMBERS (Woodrow Wilson Center) Carol Cartwright, July 2001 John H. Foster, Jean L. Hennessey, Sharon Wolchik Daniel L. Lamaute, (The George Washington Doris O. Mausui, University) Thomas R. Reedy, Nancy M. Zirkin COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT THE COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT WORKING PAPER SERIES CHRISTIAN F. OSTERMANN, Series Editor This paper is one of a series of Working Papers published by the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. Established in 1991 by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Cold War International History Project (CWIHP) disseminates new information and perspectives on the history of the Cold War as it emerges from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side” of the post-World War II superpower rivalry.
    [Show full text]
  • Marx and History: the Russian Road and the Myth of Historical Determinism
    Ciências Sociais Unisinos 57(1):78-86, janeiro/abril 2021 Unisinos - doi: 10.4013/csu.2021.57.1.07 Marx and history: the Russian road and the myth of historical determinism Marx e a história: a via russa e o mito do determinismo histórico Guilherme Nunes Pires1 [email protected] Abstract This paper aims to point out the limits of the historical determinism thesis in Marx’s thought by analyzing his writings on the Russian issue and the possibility of a “Russian road” to socialism. The perspective of historical determinism implies that Marx’s thought is supported by a unilinear view of social evolution, i.e. history is understood as a succes- sion of modes of production and their internal relations inexorably leading to a classless society. We argue that in letters and drafts on the Russian issue, Marx opposes to any attempt associate his thought with a deterministic conception of history. It is pointed out that Marx’s contact with the Russian populists in the 1880s provides textual ele- ments allowing to impose limits on the idea of historical determinism and the unilinear perspective in the historical process. Keywords: Marx. Historical Determinism. Unilinearity. Russian Road. Resumo O objetivo do presente artigo é apontar os limites da tese do determinismo histórico no pensamento de Marx, através da análise dos escritos sobre a questão russa e a possibilidade da “via russa” para o socialismo. A perspectiva do determinismo histórico compreende que o pensamento de Marx estaria amparado por uma visão unilinear da evolução social, ou seja, a história seria compreendida por uma sucessão de modos de produção e suas relações internas que inexoravelmente rumaria a uma sociedade sem classes sociais.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleksandr Bogdanov and Systems Theory
    Democracy & Nature, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2000 Aleksandr Bogdanov and Systems Theory ARRAN GARE ABSTRACT The signi cance and potential of systems theory and complexity theory are best appreciated through an understanding of their origins. Arguably, their originator was the Russian philosopher and revolutionary, Aleksandr Bogdanov. Bogdanov anticipated later developments of systems theory and complexity theory in his efforts to lay the foundations for a new, post-capitalist culture and science. This science would overcome the division between the natural and the human sciences and enable workers to organise themselves and their productive activity. It would be central to the culture of a society in which class and gender divisions have been transcended. At the same time it would free people from the deformed thinking of class societies, enabling them to appreciate both the limitations and the signi cance of their environments and other forms of life. In this paper it is argued that whatever Bogdanov’s limitations, such a science is still required if we are to create a society free of class divisions, and that it is in this light that developments in systems theory and complexity theory should be judged. Aleksandr Bogdanov, the Russian revolutionary, philosopher and scientist, has a good claim to being regarded as the founder of systems theory.1 His ‘tektology’, that is, his new science of organisation, not only anticipated and probably in uenced the ideas of Ludwig von Bertalanffy—who must have been familiar with his work,2 but anticipated many of the ideas of the complexity theorists. As Simona Poustlinik commented at a recent conference on Bogdanov: It is remarkable the extent to which Bogdanov anticipated the ideas which were to be developed in systems thinking later in the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • N.I.Il`Minskii and the Christianization of the Chuvash
    Durham E-Theses Narodnost` and Obshchechelovechnost` in 19th century Russian missionary work: N.I.Il`minskii and the Christianization of the Chuvash KOLOSOVA, ALISON,RUTH How to cite: KOLOSOVA, ALISON,RUTH (2016) Narodnost` and Obshchechelovechnost` in 19th century Russian missionary work: N.I.Il`minskii and the Christianization of the Chuvash, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11403/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 1 Narodnost` and Obshchechelovechnost` in 19th century Russian missionary work: N.I.Il`minskii and the Christianization of the Chuvash PhD Thesis submitted by Alison Ruth Kolosova Material Abstract Nikolai Il`minskii, a specialist in Arabic and the Turkic languages which he taught at the Kazan Theological Academy and Kazan University from the 1840s to 1860s, became in 1872 the Director of the Kazan Teachers‟ Seminary where the first teachers were trained for native- language schools among the Turkic and Finnic peoples of the Volga-Urals and Siberia.
    [Show full text]
  • Problems of Translating Into Russian
    Volume 21 Number 2 Article 30 Winter 10-15-1996 Problems of Translating into Russian Natalia Grigorieva Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore Part of the Children's and Young Adult Literature Commons Recommended Citation Grigorieva, Natalia (1996) "Problems of Translating into Russian," Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature: Vol. 21 : No. 2 , Article 30. Available at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol21/iss2/30 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mythopoeic Society at SWOSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature by an authorized editor of SWOSU Digital Commons. An ADA compliant document is available upon request. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To join the Mythopoeic Society go to: http://www.mythsoc.org/join.htm Mythcon 51: A VIRTUAL “HALFLING” MYTHCON July 31 - August 1, 2021 (Saturday and Sunday) http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-51.htm Mythcon 52: The Mythic, the Fantastic, and the Alien Albuquerque, New Mexico; July 29 - August 1, 2022 http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-52.htm Abstract The general traditions of Russian literature has been based on the requirement that any literary translation should be good literature in itself as well as preserving the author’s manner of writing. It seems that understanding of J.R.R. Tolkien and his books is growing very slowly in Russia. There have never been any professional literary works on Tolkien or the problems of translating his works.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bolshevik-Menshevik Split in July 1903, Fifty-Seven Delegates to The
    The Bolshevik-Menshevik Split In July 1903, fifty-seven delegates to the Second Congress of the Russian Social-Democratic Labor Party (RSDLP) assembled in a flea-ridden flour warehouse in Brussels. Plekhanov, the respected veteran Russian Marxist, was elected chairman, but the delegates felt uneasy in Belgium and moved to London, where the authorities could be relied on to ignore them. The meetings were extremely argumentative, with endless hair-splitting as every tiny point was dissected and analyzed. It became clear that the party was split between two groups, the Bolsheviks (‘majority’) and the Mensheviks (‘minority’). The Bolsheviks claimed the name after getting their way in a dispute over control of the editorial board of the Party newspaper, Iskra (‘the Spark’ – which was to ‘start a big blaze’). The Mensheviks unwisely accepted the title of minority group, though they were actually more often in the majority. Both groups were enthusiastic for the destruction of capitalism and the overthrow of the Tsarist regime, but the Mensheviks, led by Martov, favored a large, loosely organized democratic party whose members could agree to differ on many points. They were prepared to work with the different political parties in Russia and they had scruples about the use of violence. The Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, were hardline revolutionaries who would not have known a scruple if they stumbled over it. Lenin had no time for democracy and no confidence in the masses. He wanted a small, tightly organized, strictly disciplined party of full-time members who did what they were told and followed the party line in every particular detail.
    [Show full text]
  • NARRATING the NATIONAL FUTURE: the COSSACKS in UKRAINIAN and RUSSIAN ROMANTIC LITERATURE by ANNA KOVALCHUK a DISSERTATION Prese
    NARRATING THE NATIONAL FUTURE: THE COSSACKS IN UKRAINIAN AND RUSSIAN ROMANTIC LITERATURE by ANNA KOVALCHUK A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Comparative Literature and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2017 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Anna Kovalchuk Title: Narrating the National Future: The Cossacks in Ukrainian and Russian Romantic Literature This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Comparative Literature by: Katya Hokanson Chairperson Michael Allan Core Member Serhii Plokhii Core Member Jenifer Presto Core Member Julie Hessler Institutional Representative and Scott L. Pratt Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2017 ii © 2017 Anna Kovalchuk iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Anna Kovalchuk Doctor of Philosophy Department of Comparative Literature June 2017 Title: Narrating the National Future: The Cossacks in Ukrainian and Russian Romantic Literature This dissertation investigates nineteenth-century narrative representations of the Cossacks—multi-ethnic warrior communities from the historical borderlands of empire, known for military strength, pillage, and revelry—as contested historical figures in modern identity politics. Rather than projecting today’s political borders into the past and proceeding from the claim that the Cossacks are either Russian or Ukrainian, this comparative project analyzes the nineteenth-century narratives that transform pre- national Cossack history into national patrimony. Following the Romantic era debates about national identity in the Russian empire, during which the Cossacks become part of both Ukrainian and Russian national self-definition, this dissertation focuses on the role of historical narrative in these burgeoning political projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 13, March 2012
    Issue 13, March 2012 OO THERTHER MMINDINDSS The Unofficial Role-Playing Magazine for J.R.R. Tolkien’s Middle-earth and beyond OTHER MINDS Magazine Issue 13, March 2012 Publisher Other Minds Volunteers Co-Editors Assistant Editors Thomas Morwinsky Neville Percy Hawke Robinson Chris Seeman Proof Readers Artwork Neville Percy Jon Hodgson (SG/C7) Tomasz Jedruszek (SG/C7) Ted Nasmith Neville “Osric” Percy Tuuliky Production Staff Thomas Morwinsky 1 Unless otherwise noted, every contribution in this magazine is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license (b n a) The exact license of a given contribution can be found at the beginning of each contribution. © 1996 ‘Scouring the Mountain’ by Ted Nasmith, used with permission of the artist Other Minds Magazine MAIN FEATURES MAIN FEATURES MAIN FEATURES 3 Editorial: Not an unlucky number! 10 A Review of The One Ring— 38 The Dwarven Iglismêk by Thomas Morwinsky Adventures over the Edge of the by Neville “Osric” Percy Wild 4 Inside Information by Neville “Osric” Percy 42 Population and Urbanization In by Thomas Morwinsky Eriador 20 The Art of Magic—with TOR stats by Thomas Morwinsky 6 The Road Goes Ever On by Daniel “Vaco” Vacaflores by Thomas Morwinsky OTHER FEATURES 104 Fine Print and Disclaimers 105 Creative Commons License 108 Appendix “Then Ilúvatar said to them: 'Of the theme that I have declared to you, I will now that ye make in harmony to- gether a Great Music. And since I have kindled you with the Flame Imperishable, ye shall show forth your powers in adorning this theme, each with his own thoughts and devices, if he will.
    [Show full text]
  • Ilya Repin and the Zaporozhe Cossacks
    Skidmore College Creative Matter MALS Final Projects, 1995-2019 MALS 5-17-2008 Ilya Repin and the Zaporozhe Cossacks Kristina Pavlov-Leiching Skidmore College Follow this and additional works at: https://creativematter.skidmore.edu/mals_stu_schol Part of the European History Commons, and the Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Pavlov-Leiching, Kristina, "Ilya Repin and the Zaporozhe Cossacks" (2008). MALS Final Projects, 1995-2019. 50. https://creativematter.skidmore.edu/mals_stu_schol/50 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the MALS at Creative Matter. It has been accepted for inclusion in MALS Final Projects, 1995-2019 by an authorized administrator of Creative Matter. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ilya Repin and the Zaporozhe Cossacks by Kristina Pavlov-Leiching FINAL PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN LIBERAL STUDIES SKIDMORE COLLEGE May 2008 Advisors: Kate Graney, Ken Klotz THE MASTER OF ARTS PROGRAM IN LIBERAL STUDIES SKIDMORE COLLEGE CONTENTS ABSTRACT . .. .. iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS . v Chapter INTRODUCTION . .. .. .. 1. Goals of the Study 1. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND . .. .. .. 3. Repin and the Academy of Arts in St. Petersburg Repin's Experiences Abroad Repin and the Wanderers Association Repin as a Teacher and Reformer Repin's Final Years 2. REPIN'S AESTHETIC BELIEFS AS AN ARTIST AND TEACHER . .................................. 15. An Artist Driven by Social Obligation A Painter of the Peasantry and Revolutionary A Devout Nationalist An Advocate of Art forAr t's Sake(1873-1876 & 1890s) Impressionist Influence An Encounter with Tolstoy's Aesthetics Repin as a Teacher and Reformer of the Academy The Importance of the Creative Process A Return to National Realism 11 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchist Modernism and Yiddish Literature
    i “Any Minute Now the World’s Overflowing Its Border”: Anarchist Modernism and Yiddish Literature by Anna Elena Torres A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Joint Doctor of Philosophy with the Graduate Theological Union in Jewish Studies and the Designated Emphasis in Women, Gender and Sexuality in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Chana Kronfeld, Chair Professor Naomi Seidman Professor Nathaniel Deutsch Professor Juana María Rodríguez Summer 2016 ii “Any Minute Now the World’s Overflowing Its Border”: Anarchist Modernism and Yiddish Literature Copyright © 2016 by Anna Elena Torres 1 Abstract “Any Minute Now the World’s Overflowing Its Border”: Anarchist Modernism and Yiddish Literature by Anna Elena Torres Joint Doctor of Philosophy with the Graduate Theological Union in Jewish Studies and the Designated Emphasis in Women, Gender and Sexuality University of California, Berkeley Professor Chana Kronfeld, Chair “Any Minute Now the World’s Overflowing Its Border”: Anarchist Modernism and Yiddish Literature examines the intertwined worlds of Yiddish modernist writing and anarchist politics and culture. Bringing together original historical research on the radical press and close readings of Yiddish avant-garde poetry by Moyshe-Leyb Halpern, Peretz Markish, Yankev Glatshteyn, and others, I show that the development of anarchist modernism was both a transnational literary trend and a complex worldview. My research draws from hitherto unread material in international archives to document the world of the Yiddish anarchist press and assess the scope of its literary influence. The dissertation’s theoretical framework is informed by diaspora studies, gender studies, and translation theory, to which I introduce anarchist diasporism as a new term.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Emigration and British Marxist Socialism
    WALTER KENDALL RUSSIAN EMIGRATION AND BRITISH MARXIST SOCIALISM Britain's tradition of political asylum has for centuries brought refugees of many nationalities to her shores. The influence both direct and indirect, which they have exerted on British life has been a factor of no small importance. The role of religious immigration has frequently been examined, that of the socialist emigres from Central Europe has so far received less detailed attention. Engels was a frequent contributor to the "Northern Star" at the time of the Chartist upsurge in the mid-icjth century,1 Marx also contributed.2 George Julian Harney and to a lesser extent other Chartist leaders were measurably influenced by their connection with European political exiles.3 At least one of the immigrants is reputed to have been involved in plans for a Chartist revolt.4 The influence which foreign exiles exerted at the time of Chartism was to be repro- duced, although at a far higher pitch of intensity in the events which preceded and followed the Russian Revolutions of March and October 1917. The latter years of the 19th century saw a marked increase of foreign immigration into Britain. Under the impact of antisemitism over 1,500,000 Jewish emigrants left Czarist Russia between 1881 and 1910, 500,000 of them in the last five years. The number of foreigners in the UK doubled between 1880 and 1901.5 Out of a total of 30,000 Russian, Polish and Roumanian immigrants the Home Office reported that no less than 8,000 had landed between June 1901 and June 1902.6 1 Mark Hovell, The Chartist Movement, Manchester 1925, p.
    [Show full text]