DOCSLIB.ORG

NARRATING the NATIONAL FUTURE: the COSSACKS in UKRAINIAN and RUSSIAN ROMANTIC LITERATURE by ANNA KOVALCHUK a DISSERTATION Prese

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NARRATING the NATIONAL FUTURE: the COSSACKS in UKRAINIAN and RUSSIAN ROMANTIC LITERATURE by ANNA KOVALCHUK a DISSERTATION Prese NARRATING THE NATIONAL FUTURE: THE COSSACKS IN UKRAINIAN AND RUSSIAN ROMANTIC LITERATURE by ANNA KOVALCHUK A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Comparative Literature and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2017 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Anna Kovalchuk Title: Narrating the National Future: The Cossacks in Ukrainian and Russian Romantic Literature This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Comparative Literature by: Katya Hokanson Chairperson Michael Allan Core Member Serhii Plokhii Core Member Jenifer Presto Core Member Julie Hessler Institutional Representative and Scott L. Pratt Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2017 ii © 2017 Anna Kovalchuk iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Anna Kovalchuk Doctor of Philosophy Department of Comparative Literature June 2017 Title: Narrating the National Future: The Cossacks in Ukrainian and Russian Romantic Literature This dissertation investigates nineteenth-century narrative representations of the Cossacks—multi-ethnic warrior communities from the historical borderlands of empire, known for military strength, pillage, and revelry—as contested historical figures in modern identity politics. Rather than projecting today’s political borders into the past and proceeding from the claim that the Cossacks are either Russian or Ukrainian, this comparative project analyzes the nineteenth-century narratives that transform pre- national Cossack history into national patrimony. Following the Romantic era debates about national identity in the Russian empire, during which the Cossacks become part of both Ukrainian and Russian national self-definition, this dissertation focuses on the role of historical narrative in these burgeoning political projects. Drawing on Alexander Pushkin’s Poltava (1828), Nikolai Gogol’s Taras Bulba (1835, 1842), and Taras Shevchenko’s Haidamaky (1842), this dissertation traces the relationship between Cossack history, the poet-historian, and possible national futures in Ukrainian and Russian Romantic literature. In the age of empire, these literary representations shaped the emerging Ukrainian and Russian nations, conceptualized national belonging in terms of the domestic family unit, and reimagined the genealogical relationship between iv Ukrainian and Russian history. Uniting the national “we” in its readership, these Romantic texts prioritize the poet-historian’s creative, generative power and their ability to discover, legitimate, and project the nation into the future. This framework shifts the focus away from the political nation-state to emphasize the unifying power of shared narrative history and the figurative, future-oriented, and narrative genesis of national imaginaries. v CURRICULUM VITAE NAME OF AUTHOR: Anna Kovalchuk GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE SCHOOLS ATTENDED: University of Oregon, Eugene University of California, San Diego DEGREES AWARDED: Doctor of Philosophy, 2017, University of Oregon Bachelor of Arts, Literature, 2007, University of California, San Diego Bachelor of Arts, International Studies, 2007, University of California, San Diego AREAS OF SPECIAL INTEREST: Ukrainian and Russian Literature Cossack Literature, History and Myth Empire and Nation Nationalism and Narrative World Literature and Postcolonial Literature PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Instructor of Comparative Literature, University of Oregon, 2013-2017 Instructor of English Composition, University of Oregon, 2012-2015 GRANTS, AWARDS, AND HONORS: Dissertation Fellowship, Oregon Humanities Center, 2016 Russian Language Teachers Program, American Councils, Russian State Pedagogical University, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2015 STARTALK Summer Institute, Middlebury Russian School, 2014 NEH Summer Seminar, “The Late Ottoman and Russian Empires: Citizenship, Belonging, and Difference,” George Washington University, 2014 vi The Theodosius and Irene Senkowsky Prize for Demonstrated Achievement in Ukrainian Studies, Harvard University Ukrainian Research Institute, 2011 Summer Writing Fellowship, University of Oregon, 2011 Beall Educational Opportunity Award, University of Oregon, 2010, 2014, 2015, 2016 vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am especially grateful to the director of my dissertation, Katya Hokanson, for the years of conversations, feedback, support and collegiality that have made this project possible and often enjoyable. I feel deeply honored to have benefited from the generosity and mentorship of all my committee members. I would like to thank Michael Allan, for the term id exams and for always questioning the stakes of reading, and Jenifer Presto, whose perspicacious readings bring clarity. I would also like to thank Julie Hessler for her excellent questions and Serhii Plokhii, whose prolific scholarship and kindness continues to inspire. The project has benefitted from the comments and questions of the panels and audiences at the American Comparative Literature Association at Harvard University, the Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies at Washington, DC, the American Association of Teachers of Slavic and Eastern European Languages at Vancouver, BC, Austin, TX, and San Francisco, CA as well as those at the University of Oregon. All errors that remain are my own. I would also like to thank the Oregon Humanities Center for their invaluable support of this research. I am deeply indebted to my past and present professors, colleagues, and friends, especially those in the Department of Comparative Literature and especially Rachel Eccleston, whose friendship made every step of the way better. I owe my sanity to my husband Chris, whose perspective, love, and support always reminds me what is truly meaningful. Words fail me in thanking my parents, who brought me here and to whom I owe everything. viii For my family ix TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 Notes ...................................................................................................................... 12 II. THE ILLICIT BRIDEGROOM AND THE AUTOCRAT: UKRAINIAN UPRISING AND NATIONAL CONSOLIDATION IN PUSHKIN’S POLTAVA .......................................................................................... 15 Notes ...................................................................................................................... 65 III. ANCIENT MODELS AND NATIONAL REGENERATION IN GOGOL’S ARABESQUES AND TARAS BULBAS ................................................................. 73 Notes ...................................................................................................................... 136 IV. SHEVCHENKO’S HAIDAMAKY: LITERARY PARTHENOGENESIS AND THE POLITICS AND POETICS OF NATIONAL REBIRTH ................... 148 Notes ...................................................................................................................... 188 V. CONCLUSION ....................................................................................................... 195 REFERENCES CITED ................................................................................................ 200 x CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION In 1995, a thought-provoking discussion in Slavic Review began with Mark von Hagen’s essay, “Does Ukraine Have a History?”1 Von Hagen defines history as “a written record of [an] experienced past that commands some widespread acceptance and authority in the international scholarly and political communities” (658). Due to a lack of statehood in the nineteenth century, the essay explains that Ukraine and other central and eastern European states are “suspect candidates in the international order” and “have been denied full historiographical legitimacy” in the twentieth century (659-60). While arguing that no, Ukraine does not have a history, von Hagen understands Ukraine’s historiographical weakness as a strength “precisely because it challenges so many of the clichés of the nation-state paradigm” (673). While von Hagen’s article and the response essays focus on the twentieth century, another rich context for this debate can be found amidst the shifting imperial borders and emerging national narratives of the early nineteenth-century Romantic era. Though the nation-state dominates our contemporary understanding of borders, histories, and literatures, the concept of the nation is relatively modern and gained currency in the late eighteenth century amidst the declining legitimacy of autocratic and dynastic frameworks of power.2 While military might and imperial expansion legitimated civilizations in the eighteenth century, the post- Napoleonic world also required proof of national uniqueness and autonomous historical development made visible in literary language and narrative history. This dissertation focuses on the intertwined and overlapping development of national, historical, and 1 literary narratives in the early nineteenth-century Russian empire and situates the ongoing debates about Ukrainian history within a global story of national and narrative discovery. The nation’s relative modernity and its concomitant claims to antiquity evidence the importance of history to past and present nationalisms.3 Via a simultaneous discovery of the past, legitimation of the present, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Khmelnytsky Uprising Was a Cossack Rebellion in Ukraine Between the Years 1648–1657 Which Turned Into a Ukrainian War of Liberation from Poland
    The Khmelnytsky Uprising was a Cossack rebellion in Ukraine between the years 1648–1657 which turned into a Ukrainian war of liberation from Poland. Under the command of Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky , the Cossacks [warrior caste] allied with the Crimean Tatars, and the local peasantry, fought several battles against forces of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The result was an eradication of the control of the Polish and their Jewish intermediaries. Between 1648 and 1656, tens of thousands of Jews—given the lack of reliable data, it is impossible to establish more accurate figures—were killed by the rebels, and to this day the Khmelnytsky uprising is considered by Jews to be one of the most traumatic events in their history . The losses inflicted on the Jews of Poland during the fatal decade 1648-1658 were appalling. In the reports of the chroniclers, the number of Jewish victims varies between one hundred thousand and five hundred thousand…even exceeding the catastrophes of the Crusades and the Black Death in Western Europe. Some seven hundred Jewish communities in Poland had suffered massacre and pillage . In the Ukrainian cities situated on the left banks of the Dnieper, the region populated by Cossacks... the Jewish communities had disappeared almost completely . In 1 the localities on the right shore of the Dneiper or in the Polish part of the Ukraine as well as those of Volhynia and Podolia, wherever Cossacks had made their appearance, only about one tenth of the Jewish population survived . http://www.holocaust-history.org/questions/ukrainians.shtml Our research shows that a significant portion of the Ukrainian population voluntarily cooperated with the invaders of their country and voluntarily assisted in the Holocaust.
    [Show full text]
  • Venetian Hosts and Ottoman Guests in the Venedik Sarayı in Constantinople (C
    Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie orientale e-ISSN 2385-3042 Vol. 54 – Giugno 2018 ISSN 1125-3789 Venetian Hosts and Ottoman Guests in the Venedik Sarayı in Constantinople (c. 1670-1681) Maria Pia Pedani (Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia) Abstract After the end of the Cretan war (1645-1669) and before the starting of the Morean war (1684-1699) Venetian diplomats settled again in Constantinople and in the Venetian Palace (Venedik Sarayı) that had been the embassy of the Republic for centuries. In this period baili and extraordinary ambassadors (ambasciatori straordinari) used to celebrate Venetian or Ottoman civic and religious festivals with dinners and parties. Their guests were above all other European diplomats and middle- ranking Ottoman officials. Some Turks, above all those who lived in the neighbourhood, contributed to the organisation of such events with their gifts and, in exchange, they received money or other presents. This paper aims to study the circulation of objects and commodities between Europe and the Ottoman Empire and, in particular, which kind of items were exchanged before or during official dinners held in the Venetian Palace or in the Venetian summer houses in Arnavutköy and Balta Liman. The Turks brought or sent mostly vegetables, flowers and different kind of food, while Venetians used to give to their guests not only the famous Venetian cloths but also unusual objects such as ivory boxes, gloves, brushes, glass sculptures, mirrors, fans, fake flowers and so on. The sources used for this research are the accounting books of the Venetian embassy for the years 1670-83. Keywords Gift exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin Struggle for Independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649
    University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Electronic Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Major Papers 1-1-1967 The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649. Andrew B. Pernal University of Windsor Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd Recommended Citation Pernal, Andrew B., "The role of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi and the Kozaks in the Rusin struggle for independence from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth: 1648--1649." (1967). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 6490. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/6490 This online database contains the full-text of PhD dissertations and Masters’ theses of University of Windsor students from 1954 forward. These documents are made available for personal study and research purposes only, in accordance with the Canadian Copyright Act and the Creative Commons license—CC BY-NC-ND (Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative Works). Under this license, works must always be attributed to the copyright holder (original author), cannot be used for any commercial purposes, and may not be altered. Any other use would require the permission of the copyright holder. Students may inquire about withdrawing their dissertation and/or thesis from this database. For additional inquiries, please contact the repository administrator via email ([email protected]) or by telephone at 519-253-3000ext. 3208. THE ROLE OF BOHDAN KHMELNYTSKYI AND OF THE KOZAKS IN THE RUSIN STRUGGLE FOR INDEPENDENCE FROM THE POLISH-LI'THUANIAN COMMONWEALTH: 1648-1649 by A ‘n d r e w B. Pernal, B. A. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History of the University of Windsor in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Faculty of Graduate Studies 1967 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructive Forgery: the Hadiach Agreement (1658) in the History of the Rus'
    Journal of Ukrainian Studies 35–36 (2010–2011) Reconstructive Forgery: The Hadiach Agreement (1658) in the History of the Rus' Serhii Plokhy Few events in Ukrainian and Polish history have provoked as many what-ifs as the agreement concluded between the Cossack hetman Ivan Vyhovsky and representa- tives of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth near the city of Hadiach in the autumn of 1658. Long before the rise of virtual and counterfactual history, historians in Poland and Ukraine defied the maxim of positivist historiography—that history has no subjunctive mood—and plunged into speculation on how differently the history of both countries would have turned out if, instead of fighting prolonged and exhausting wars, Poland-Lithuania and the Hetmanate had reunited in a new and reformed Com- monwealth. Would this have stopped the decline of Poland, the ruin of Ukraine, Ottoman interventions, and the rise of Muscovy as the dominant force in the region? The Union of Hadiach, as the agreement became known in historiography, had the potential to influence all these processes. It envisioned the creation of a tripartite Commonwealth—the Kingdom of Poland, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, and a Principality of Rus', with the Cossack hetman as its official head. The union was the culmination of the activities of moderate forces among the Polish and Ukrainian elites and the embodiment of the hopes and dreams of the Ruthenian (Ukrainian and Bela- rusian) nobility of the first half of the seventeenth century. Nevertheless, the com- promise that the union embodied was rejected by mainstream forces on both sides. The Commonwealth Diet ratified the text of the treaty with a number of important omis- sions, but even in that form it was viewed with suspicion and rejected by the Polish nobiliary elites, which could not reconcile themselves to the prospect of Orthodox Cossacks enjoying equal rights with Catholic nobles.
    [Show full text]
  • Nikolaj Von Wassilko. Bukovinian Statesman and Diplomat
    https://doi.org/10.4316/CC.2019.01.010 POLITICS AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES NIKOLAJ VON WASSILKO. BUKOVINIAN STATESMAN AND DIPLOMAT Oleksandr DOBRZHANSKYI Yurii Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University (Ukraine) E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The article is dedicated to the study of the political biography of Nikolaj von Wassilko, a well-known Bukovinian leader, one of the most controversial personages among Ukrainian politicians of Austria-Hungary at the end of the 19th – the beginning of the 20th century. It is worth mentioning that many scientists from various countries wrote about N. Wassilko, but separate studies about his life and political activities have not been written yet. Author paid considerable attention to the formation of N. Wassilko's political views, the evolution of his preferences from conservative Rusynism and Moscophilia philosophy to the populistic doctrine. Since the beginning of the 20th century, N. Wassilko became almost the sole leader of Ukrainians in Bukovina. The article presents the analysis of his activities in the Austrian Parliament, the Diet of Bukovina, public organizations, and his initiatives to resolve various regional issues. His activities in the years of World War I were equally rich. In particular, the article shows his diplomatic activities as the ambassador of the ZUNR (West Ukrainian People's Republic) in Vienna, the ambassador of the UPR (Ukrainian People's Republic) in Switzerland and other countries. At the end of the research, the author points out the remarkable path of N. Wassilko in the history of the Ukrainian movement in Bukovina in the early twentieth century, as one of the central figures of the Ukrainian diplomacy during 1918-1924.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Ukraine Advisory Board
    THE HISTORY OF UKRAINE ADVISORY BOARD John T. Alexander Professor of History and Russian and European Studies, University of Kansas Robert A. Divine George W. Littlefield Professor in American History Emeritus, University of Texas at Austin John V. Lombardi Professor of History, University of Florida THE HISTORY OF UKRAINE Paul Kubicek The Greenwood Histories of the Modern Nations Frank W. Thackeray and John E. Findling, Series Editors Greenwood Press Westport, Connecticut • London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Kubicek, Paul. The history of Ukraine / Paul Kubicek. p. cm. — (The Greenwood histories of the modern nations, ISSN 1096 –2095) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978 – 0 –313 – 34920 –1 (alk. paper) 1. Ukraine —History. I. Title. DK508.51.K825 2008 947.7— dc22 2008026717 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright © 2008 by Paul Kubicek All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 2008026717 ISBN: 978– 0– 313 – 34920 –1 ISSN: 1096 –2905 First published in 2008 Greenwood Press, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. www.greenwood.com Printed in the United States of America The paper used in this book complies with the Permanent Paper Standard issued by the National Information Standards Organization (Z39.48 –1984). 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Every reasonable effort has been made to trace the owners of copyright materials in this book, but in some instances this has proven impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Lands of the Romanovs: an Annotated Bibliography of First-Hand English-Language Accounts of the Russian Empire
    ANTHONY CROSS In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of The Russian Empire (1613-1917) OpenBook Publishers To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/268 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917) Anthony Cross http://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2014 Anthony Cross The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt it and to make commercial use of it providing that attribution is made to the author (but not in any way that suggests that he endorses you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Cross, Anthony, In the Land of the Romanovs: An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917), Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/ OBP.0042 Please see the list of illustrations for attribution relating to individual images. Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omissions or errors will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. As for the rights of the images from Wikimedia Commons, please refer to the Wikimedia website (for each image, the link to the relevant page can be found in the list of illustrations).
    [Show full text]
  • Hrushevsky Rev. Stevens from SCN Spring 16 SCN-12.Pdf
    reviews 51 conceptualizing and clarifying the nature of the discourse of social reform in early modern Europe. Her treatment of utopian discourse in Renaissance England benefits from consideration of authors whose inclusion borders on the counterintuitive. Scholars of the period will find it perceptive and insightful; those concerned with utopian dis- course in a later period will find it a sound and helpful starting point. Mykhailo Hrushevsky. History of Ukraine-Rus’. Vol. 10: The Cossack Age, 1657-1659. Edmonton and Toronto: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press, 2014. c + 327pp. + 3 maps. Review by Carol B. Stevens, Colgate University. Another volume of Mykhailo Hrushevsky’s magisterial History of Ukraine-Rus’ has become available in English translation, thanks to the efforts of the Peter Jacyk Centre for Ukrainian Historical Re- search at the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies. It will take its place alongside earlier English-language translations of the History. Currently, volume one is in print, while volumes 2–5 are projected; this sequence, volumes 1–5, covers the time period through the fif- teenth century. The translation of volume ten represents something a bit different—the completion of a four-volume subseries (#7–10) within the History; these volumes deal with the early modern history of Ukrainian Cossacks from the fifteenth century through to 1659 and the ratification of the Treaty of Hadiach. Mykhailo Hrushevsky was at work on this, the tenth volume of his history of Ukraine-Rus,’ when he died in 1934. When he died, only the first part of a longer intended volume was substantially complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish) Lesson Plan (English) the Crisis, Reform, and Collapse of the Nobles’ Republic (Revision Class)
    The Crisis, Reform, and Collapse of the Nobles’ Republic (revision class) The Crisis, Reform, and Collapse of the Nobles’ Republic (revision class) Lesson Plan (Polish) Lesson Plan (English) The Crisis, Reform, and Collapse of the Nobles’ Republic (revision class) 3rd May 1791 Constuon Source: Jan Matejko, Konstytucja 3 Maja 1791 roku, 1891, oil on canvas, domena publiczna. Link to the Lesson You will learn to describe the most important historical events of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; to list the crises that struck Poland in the eighteenth century and what attempts at reform were undertaken; to explain the historical significance of the collapse of the Polish‐Lithuanian Commonwealth. Nagranie dostępne na portalu epodreczniki.pl Nagranie abstraktu By the eighteenth century, the Polish‐Lithuanian political system became anachronistic. The state was becoming ever weaker. It did not pursue an active foreign policy; it was more of an object than a subject on the international stage. Due to the presence of the liberum veto, the nobility obstructed attempts at reform with ease. One deputy’s vote against a project was enough to dismiss the entire Sejm. The representatives of the nobility oftentimes accepted bribes from foreign powers that wished to keep Poland‐Lithuania weak. Russia had ever more say in the affairs of the country. When Stanisław II Augustus was elected King, some of the patriotically inclined nobles rebelled against his rule and created the Bar Confederation The part of the military that remained loyal to the King suppressed the rebellion with the aid of Russian forces. Capitalizing upon the opportunity, Russia, Austria, and Prussia conducted the First Partition of Poland in 1772.
    [Show full text]
  • Moldova, Moldavia, Bessarabia Yefim Kogan, 25 September 2015
    Moldova, Moldavia, Bessarabia Yefim Kogan, 25 September 2015 Dear Researchers, I have received recently an email from Marilyn Newman: Hello Yefim, I've been following this project and appreciate your more complete break down in today's Jewishgen Digest. I did contribute to Bob Wascou before he passed. The reason for this message is that I'm confused. My family were from Moinesti and Tirgu Ocna, both near each other in Moldova. However, this area was not Bessarabia..... Can you explain what areas of Moldova are covered other than Bessarabia and Chisanou (sp.). Many Thanks, Marilyn Newman Marilyn thank you. I think this is a very important question. I was getting many similar message for many years. Let’s clear this confusion. Let's start with terminology. The term Moldavia and Moldova mean the same region! Moldova is in Romanian language and Moldavia was adopted by Russian and other languages, including English. Charles King in 'The Moldovans. Romania, Russia, and the Politics of Culture', Stanford U., 1999 writes that 'It is a myth that Moldova changed its name from Moldavia. What happened in the 1990s was simply that we in the West became better informed about what locals themselves had always called it.' So let's dive into the history of the region: Moldavia is known as a country or Principality from 14 century until 1812. There were also two other Danube or Romanian Principalities - Walachia and Transilvania. At some point in the history Moldavia joined other Principalities. In 1538 Moldavia surrendered to Ottoman Empire, and remained under Turks for about 300 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc
    Barry Lawrence Ruderman Antique Maps Inc. 7407 La Jolla Boulevard www.raremaps.com (858) 551-8500 La Jolla, CA 92037 [email protected] La Journee De Poltawa En Ukraine le 8e. julliet 1709; Entre l'Armee de sa Majeste Suedoise Charles XII, et celle de sa Majeste Csarienne Pierre I, Empereur de la grande Russie . 1714 Stock#: 29171 Map Maker: de Fer Date: 1714 Place: Paris Color: Hand Colored Condition: VG Size: 13.5 x 9 inches Price: SOLD Description: Detailed plan of the Battle of Poltava. The Battle of Poltava fought on June 27-28, 1709 was the decisive victory of Peter I of Russia over Charles XII of Sweden in the most famous of the battles of the Great Northern War. While the date given on the map reflects a July 8, 1709 battle, the modern date is given as June 27-28. After the Battle of Narva in 1700, Czar Peter I was reorganized his army, while Charles XII of Sweden fought for 6 years against Augustus II of Saxony-Poland. Peter first offensive move with his reorganized Russian Army was to establish the city of Saint Petersburg in Swedish territory. Charles attacked the Russian heartland with the intent on an assault on Moscow from Poland. The Swedish army of almost 44,000 men left Saxony on August 22, 1707 and marched eastwards. When they reached the Vistula River and crossed on December 30, then continued through Masuria and took Grodno on January 28, 1708. The Swedes continued to the area around Smorgon and Minsk ,where the army went into winter quarters.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSLATED and EDITED by GEORGE S.N. LUCKYJ Harvard Series in Ukrainian Studies Diasporiana.Org.Ua Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute Mono~Raph Series
    TRANSLATED AND EDITED BY GEORGE S.N. LUCKYJ Harvard Series in Ukrainian Studies diasporiana.org.ua Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute Mono~raph Series Editarial Board Omeljan Pritsak, Editar-in-Chief Ihor Sev~enko Paul R. Magocsi, Managing Editar Committee on Ukrainian Studies Edward Keenan Horace G. Lunt Richard E. Pipes Omeljan Pritsak, Chairman Ihor Sevl:enko Wiktor Weintraub Cambridge, Massachusetts Ievhen Sverstiuk Clandestine Essays Translation and an Introduction by George S. N. Luckyj Published by the Ukrainian Academic Press for the Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute 1976 The Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute was established in 1973 as an integral part of Harvard University. It supports research associates and visiting scholars who are engaged in projects concerned with all aspects of Ukrainian studies. The Institute also works in close cooperation with the Committee on Ukrainian Studies, which supervises and coordinates the teaching of Ukrain­ ian history, language, and literature at Harvard University. Copyright© 1976 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data ,......, ,.-.... Sverstiuk, IEvhen. Clandestine essays. (Monograph series - Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute) Includes bibliographical references. CONTENTS: A cathedral in scaffolding. -Ivan Kot­ liarevs'kyi is laughing. -Final plea before the court. 1. Ukraine-Politics and govemment-1917- -Addresses, essays, lectures. 2. Dissenters­ Ukraine-Addresses, essays, lectures. I. Title. II. Series: Harvard University Research Institute. Monograph series- Harvard Ukrainian Research Insti­ tute. DK508.8.S825 322.4'4'094 771 76-20768 ISBN 0-87287-151-7 ISBN 0-87287-1584 pbk. Ukrainian Academic Press, a division of Libraries Unlimited, Inc., P.O.
    [Show full text]