Climate Histories of Mars and Venus, and the Habitability of Planets

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Climate Histories of Mars and Venus, and the Habitability of Planets CLIMATE HISTORIES OF MARS AND VENUS, AND THE HABITABILITY OF PLANETS In the temporal sequence that Part III of the book has ¡NTRODUCT¡ON 15.1 been following, we stand near the end of the Archean eon. Earth at the close of the Archean,2.5 billion years ago, By this point in time, the evolution of Venus and its atmo- was a world in which life had arisen and plate tectonics sphere almost certainly had diverged from that of Earth, dominated, the evolution of the crust and the recycling of and Mars was on its way to being a cold, dry world, if volatiles. Yet oxygen (Oz) still was not prevalent in the it had not already become one. This is the appropriate atmosphere, which was richer in COz than at present. In moment in geologic time, then, to consider how Earth's this last respect, Earth's atmosphere was somewhat like neighboring planets diverged so greatly in climate, and to that of its neighbors, Mars and Venus, which today retain ponder the implications for habitable planets throughout this more primitive kind of atmosphere. the cosmos. In the following chapter, we consider why Speculations on the nature of Mars and Venus were, Earth became dominated by plate tectonics, but Venus prior to the space program, heavily influenced by Earth- and Mars did not. Understanding this is part of the key centered biases and the poor quality of telescopic observa- to understanding Earth's clement climate as discussed in tions (figure 15.1). Thirty years of U.S. and Soviet robotic chapter 1.4. missions to these two bodies changed that thinking dras- tically. The overall evolutions of Mars and Venus have 15.2 VENUS been quite different from that of Earth, and very differ- ent from each other. The ability of the environment of a 15.2.1 Onigin of Venus' Thick Atmosphene planet to veer in a completely different direction from that of its neighbors was not readily appreciated until the eter- The atmosphere of Venus contains somewhat more nitro- nally hot greenhouse of Venus' surface and the cold deso- gen than does that of the Earth: 3 atmospheres of pressure lation of the Martian climate were revealed by spacecraft instead of 0.8 atmosphere. More striking, however, is the instruments. enormous surface pressure of 90 atmospheres of carbon Flowever, robotic missions also revealed evidence that dioxide. The consequence of Venus'massive atmosphere is Mars once had liquid water flowing on its surface. It is an enormous greenhouse effect: Even though the clouds of tempting, then, to assume that the early Martian climate Venus' upper atmosphere, largely sulfur compounds, re- was much warmer than it is at present, warm enough per- flect much more sunlight away than do the clouds of Earth, haps to initiate life on the surface of Mars. However, the Venus has a surface temperature of 730 K. In other words, difficulty of sustaining a warm Martian atmosphere in the even though the surface ofVenus receives less sunlight than face of the faint-early-sun problem of chapter 14 remains a does the Earth's surface, the temperature at Venus' surface daunting puzzle, one that is highly relevant to the broader is above the melting point of lead. Liquid water is not sta- question of habitable planets beyond our solar system. ble on the surface or anywhere in the atmosphere; gaseous !íhat is the range of distances from any given star for water vapor is only 10 parts per million of the atmosphere. which liquid water is stable on a planetary surface and Oxygen is not abundant either, with a pressure of 0.002 Iife can gain a foothold? atmosphere, one-hundredth that in our atmosphere. PLANETS 174 CLIMATE HISTOFìIES OF MAFìS AND VENUS, AND THE HABITABILITY OF Figune 15.1. Prior to th by hand typically showed telescopic images and ca some as a sign of intellige Lowell intenpneted these illusory features as vast to the parched equatonial deserts, a granden vers the Ari)ona and ialifo¡nia deserts south ând west of his high plateau observatony' retained' Although alternative models How Venus came to this state is still a subject of heated more likely to be proposed (for example, that the high deuterium debate. Venus is almost the same size as Earth, of similar have been from impacting comets), the density (and hence internal composition), and somewhat abundance is a contaminant at present to be the best expla- nearer to the Sun. One clue is the close correspondence water-loss model appears of the amount of carbon dioxide in Venus' atmosphere nation for the deuterium data. have liquid water early in the solar sys- with the amount of carbon dioxide that could be produced If Venus did challenge is to understand how it was from the carbonates and other carbon compounds trapped tem's histor¡ the explanation for the loss today in Earth's crust' If Earth's oceans were to boil awa¡ lost and when. The traditional runaluøy greenhouse,featured in many and the hydrological cycle of rainfall end, recycling of cat- lies in the so-called the solar heating at Venus' distance from bonates into the atmosphere might eventually build up a textbooks. Here, a sufficient amount of initial green- massive carbon dioxide atmosphere on our planet as well' the Sun, coupled with carbon dioxide, leads to an The divergent evolutionary paths that Earth and Venus house heating from water and Heating causes more evaporation of have taken apparently have to do with the lack, or early unstable situation: (because the evaporation rate and Ioss, of large quantities of water from Venus. Direct mea- water from the ocean content in the atmosphere are very surement of Venus'atmosphere fromPioneer Venus entry the total water vapor This higher water content' probes in 1,978 revealed a large abundance of deuterium sensitive to the temperature). temperature through (defined in chapter 2) rclative to light hydrogen in the in turn, increases the atmospheric which in turn causes more water atmosphere of Venus, the ratio of the two being about the greenhouse effect, the atmosphere further' The sys- 150 times that in the oceans of Earth' One interpretation to evaporate, warming leading quickly to the complete of such an overabundance is that large amounts of wa- tem enters a "rrtîaway," ter escaped from Venus early in its history; as the water boiling away oÍ the oceans. of the early history of Venus was lost in gaseous form from the atmosphere' the heav- Very careful modeling a runaway greenhouse was marginal ier deuterium atoms in HDO and D2O (versus H2O) were shows that at the time, 15,2 VENUS 179 for that planet. The reason lies again in the faint-early- transparent to infrared radiation, the amount of water va- sun problem. Although toda¡ Venus receives 1.9 times por drops very steeply. At about 10 km above the surface the amount of sunlight that Earth does at the top of the lies a boundary between the lower atmosphere, the tropo- atmosphere (remember much of this is reflected by Venus' sphere, and the stratosphere above it. This boundary, the clouds), in the earliest period of solar system history the tropopause, is defined by the altitude at which the tem- sunlight that Venus received was only 1,.4 times that re- perature stops falling and begins rising at higher altitude ceived by Earth at present. Below a certain threshold sur- as the air becomes transparent to most infrared radiation, face temperature, the greenhouse effect does not evaporate and some molecules selectively absorb sunlight in the ul- enough water to initiate a runaway. traviolet wavelengths. Above the tropopause, water vapor So how did Venus arrive at its present state? The solu- no longer decreases with increasing altitude; its minimum tion to this puzzle lies in considering the effect of water value is determined by the temperature at the tropopause. vapor on the entire atmosphere, as shown in figure 15.2. In Earth's atmosphere toda¡ the dropoff in temperature On Earth toda¡ because the temperature drops rapidly with height leads to a very sharp decline in water vapor with altituCe as the atmosphere thins and becomes more with altitude. The water vapor condenses as clouds and these eventually are lost as rain. The Earth's stratosphere is extremely dry today, about as dry as the present bulk atmosphere of Venus. What water vapor does exist in the stratosphere is subject to being broken apart by ultraviolet photons from the Sun to form oxygen (Oz) and hydrogen; É because hydrogen is a light molecule, it moves upward in -: 100 the atmosphere and eventually is lost to space. The ul- õ traviolet radiation is restricted to high altitudes precisely because it is absorbed there by molecules such as water 50 and ozone; the vast majority of Earth's water is protected from such destruction by being resident in the oceans and lower atmosphere. Consider now what would happen if Earth's surface temperature were increased, simulating what might have happened on Venus if it once had had liquid water oceans. More water vapor is put into the troposphere, allowing formation of more massive cloud decks. Clouds can warm or cool the climate, depending on their altitude, but their v formation by condensation always releases heat, which o¡: 100 E causes the temperature profile to fall more gently with altitude. Because of this effect, the temperature profile for higher surface temperatures declines more gradually 50 than for lower surface temperatures, and the tropopause boundary between the troposphere and the stratosphere 0L moves upward as the surface warms (figure15.2).
Recommended publications
  • The Magellan Spacecraft at Venus by Andrew Fraknoi, Astronomical Society of the Pacific
    www.astrosociety.org/uitc No. 18 - Fall 1991 © 1991, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 390 Ashton Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94112. The Magellan Spacecraft at Venus by Andrew Fraknoi, Astronomical Society of the Pacific "Having finally penetrated below the clouds of Venus, we find its surface to be naked [not hidden], revealing the history of hundreds of millions of years of geological activity. Venus is a geologist's dream planet.'' —Astronomer David Morrison This fall, the brightest star-like object you can see in the eastern skies before dawn isn't a star at all — it's Venus, the second closest planet to the Sun. Because Venus is so similar in diameter and mass to our world, and also has a gaseous atmosphere, it has been called the Earth's "sister planet''. Many years ago, scientists expected its surface, which is perpetually hidden beneath a thick cloud layer, to look like Earth's as well. Earlier this century, some people even imagined that Venus was a hot, humid, swampy world populated by prehistoric creatures! But we now know Venus is very, very different. New radar images of Venus, just returned from NASA's Magellan spacecraft orbiting the planet, have provided astronomers the clearest view ever of its surface, revealing unique geological features, meteor impact craters, and evidence of volcanic eruptions different from any others found in the solar system. This issue of The Universe in the Classroom is devoted to what Magellan is teaching us today about our nearest neighbor, Venus. Where is Venus, and what is it like? Spacecraft exploration of Venus's surface Magellan — a "recycled'' spacecraft How does Magellan take pictures through the clouds? What has Magellan revealed about Venus? How does Venus' surface compare with Earth's? What is the next step in Magellan's mission? If Venus is such an uninviting place, why are we interested in it? Reading List Why is it so hot on Venus? Where is Venus, and what is it like? Venus orbits the Sun in a nearly circular path between Mercury and the Earth, about 3/4 as far from our star as the Earth is.
    [Show full text]
  • Extraterrestrial Geology Issue
    Lite EXTRAT E RR E STRIAL GE OLO G Y ISSU E SPRING 2010 ISSUE 27 The Solar System. This illustration shows the eight planets and three of the five named dwarf planets in order of increasing distance from the Sun, although the distances between them are not to scale. The sizes of the bodies are shown relative to each other, and the colors are approximately natural. Image modified from NASA/JPL. IN TH I S ISSUE ... Extraterrestrial Geology Classroom Activity: Impact Craters • Celestial Crossword Puzzle Is There Life Beyond Earth? Meteorites in Antarctica Why Can’t I See the Milky Way? Most Wanted Mineral: Jarosite • Through the Hand Lens New Mexico’s Enchanting Geology • Short Items of Interest NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL RESOURCES A DIVISION OF NEW MEXICO TECH EXTRAT E RR E STRIAL GE OLO G Y Douglas Bland The surface of the planet we live on was created by geologic Many factors affect the appearance, characteristics, and processes, resulting in mountains, valleys, plains, volcanoes, geology of a body in space. Size, composition, temperature, an ocean basins, and every other landform around us. Geology atmosphere (or lack of it), and proximity to other bodies are affects the climate, concentrates energy and mineral resources just a few. Through images and data gathered by telescopes, in Earth’s crust, and impacts the beautiful landscapes outside satellites orbiting Earth, and spacecraft sent into deep space, the window. The surface of Earth is constantly changing due it has become obvious that the other planets and their moons to the relentless effects of plate tectonics that move continents look very different from Earth, and there is a tremendous and create and destroy oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magellan Spacecraft at Venus by Andrew Fraknoi, Astronomical Society of the Pacific
    www.astrosociety.org/uitc No. 18 - Fall 1991 © 1991, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 390 Ashton Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94112. The Magellan Spacecraft at Venus by Andrew Fraknoi, Astronomical Society of the Pacific "Having finally penetrated below the clouds of Venus, we find its surface to be naked [not hidden], revealing the history of hundreds of millions of years of geological activity. Venus is a geologist's dream planet.'' —Astronomer David Morrison This fall, the brightest star-like object you can see in the eastern skies before dawn isn't a star at all — it's Venus, the second closest planet to the Sun. Because Venus is so similar in diameter and mass to our world, and also has a gaseous atmosphere, it has been called the Earth's "sister planet''. Many years ago, scientists expected its surface, which is perpetually hidden beneath a thick cloud layer, to look like Earth's as well. Earlier this century, some people even imagined that Venus was a hot, humid, swampy world populated by prehistoric creatures! But we now know Venus is very, very different. New radar images of Venus, just returned from NASA's Magellan spacecraft orbiting the planet, have provided astronomers the clearest view ever of its surface, revealing unique geological features, meteor impact craters, and evidence of volcanic eruptions different from any others found in the solar system. This issue of The Universe in the Classroom is devoted to what Magellan is teaching us today about our nearest neighbor, Venus. Where is Venus, and what is it like? Spacecraft exploration of Venus's surface Magellan — a "recycled'' spacecraft How does Magellan take pictures through the clouds? What has Magellan revealed about Venus? How does Venus' surface compare with Earth's? What is the next step in Magellan's mission? If Venus is such an uninviting place, why are we interested in it? Reading List Why is it so hot on Venus? Where is Venus, and what is it like? Venus orbits the Sun in a nearly circular path between Mercury and the Earth, about 3/4 as far from our star as the Earth is.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal and Chemical Evolution of Venus and Super-Venus Planets
    Thermal and chemical evolution of Venus and super-Venus planets Joseph G. O'Rourke Adviser: Jun Korenaga Additional Readers: David Bercovici and Debra Fischer April 27, 2012 A Senior Thesis presented to the faculty of the Departments of Geology & Geophysics and Astronomy, Yale University, in partial fulfillment of the Bachelor's Degree In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the Bachelor's Degree from the Departments of Geology & Geophysics and Astronomy, Yale University, I agree that the departments may make copies or post it on the departmental websites so that others may better understand the undergraduate research of the departments. I further agree that extensive copying of this thesis is allowable only for scholarly purposes. It is understood, however, that any copying or publication of this thesis for commercial purposes or financial gain is not allowed without my written consent. Joseph Ghilarducci O'Rourke, 27 April, 2012 Summary The ongoing discovery of terrestrial exoplanets accentuates the importance of un- derstanding planetary evolution for a wide range of initial conditions. In Part I of this thesis, thermal evolution simulations are performed to investigate the evolution of Mars, Venus, and putative super-Venus planets in the stagnant-lid regime, the most natural mode of convection with strongly temperature-dependent viscosity. We employ principal component analysis and linear regression to capture the first-order systematics of possible evolutionary scenarios from a large number of simulation runs. With increased planetary mass, crustal thickness and the degree of mantle processing are both predicted to decrease, and such size effects can also be derived with sim- ple scaling analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms for Lithospheric Heat Transport on Venus Implications For
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 87, NO. Btt, PAGES 9236-9246,NOVEMBER t0, 1982 Mechanismsfor Lithospheric Heat Transport on Venus' Implications for Tectonic Style and Volcanism SEAN C. SOLOMON Departmentof Earth and PlanetarySciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge,Massachusetts 02139 JAMES W. HEAD Departmentof GeologicalSciences, Brown University,Providence, Rhode Island 02912 The tectonicand volcaniccharacteristics of the surfaceof Venus are poorly known, but thesecharacter- isticsmust be closelyrelated to the mechanismby which Venus rids itself of internal heat. On the other solidplanets and satellites of thesolar system, lithospheric heat [ransport is dominatedby oneof three mechanisms:(1) plate recycling,(2) lithosphericconduction, and (3) hot spot volcanism.We evaluateeach mechanismas a candidatefor the dominantmode of lithosphericheat transferon Venus,and we explore the implicationsof eachmechanism for the interpretationof Venussurface features. Despite claims made to the contrary in the literature,plate recyclingon Venus cannot be excludedon the basisof either theoreticalarguments or presentobservations on topographyand radar backscatter.Landforms resulting from plate convergenceand divergenceon Venus would differ substantiallyfrom those on the earth becauseof the high surfacetemperature and the absenceof oceanson Venus,the lack of free or hydrated water in subductedmaterial, the possibilitythat subductionwould more commonlybe accompaniedby lithosphericdelamination, and the rapid spreadingrates that would
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology and Geomorphology of the Venus Surface As Revealed by the Radar Images Obtained by Veneras 15 and 16
    THE GEOLOGY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE VENUS SURFACE AS REVEALED BY THE RADAR IMAGES OBTAINED BY VENERAS 15 AND 16 V. L. Barsukov, A. T. Basilevsky, N. N. Bobinna, V. P. Kryuchkov, R. O. Kuzmin, O. V. Nikolaeva, A. A. Pronin, L. B. Ronca, I. M. Chernaya, V. P. Shashkina, A. V. Garanin, E. R. Kushky, M. S. Markov, A. L. Sukhanov, V. A. Kotelnikov, O. N. Rzhiga, G. M. Petrov, Yu. N. Alexandrov, A. I. Sidorenko, A.F.Bogomolov, G. I. Skrypnik, M. Yu. Bergman, L. V. Kudrin, I. M. Bokshtein, P. A. Chochia, Yu. S. Tyuflin, S. A. Kadnichansky and E. L. Akim Journal of geophysical research, Vol. 91, № B4, P. D378–D398, 1986 A region-by-region condensed description of almost all of the area that was radar-photographed by Veneras 15 and 16 is presented. Using some general- izations, the diversity of terrain was reduced to a discrete set from which a geological-morphological map was constructed. The predominant type of terrain of the studied area is a plain that was tentatively subdivided into five morphological types: ridge-and-band, patchy rolling plain, dome-and-butte plain, smooth plain, and high smooth plain. Stratigraphically, the ridge-and-band plains are the oldest and the smooth plains are the youngest. The stratigraphic position of the other types is yet to be determined. Large sections of the plains show similarities to the mare-type basaltic plains of the moon, Mercury, and Mars. Other types of terrain are combinations of ridges and grooves in various patterns: linear parallel, orthogonal, diagonal or chevron-like, and chaotic.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Planets (Bennett Et Al
    Earth and the Geology of the Terrestrial Planets (Bennett et al. Ch. 9) Major Ideas In This Chapter ● Terrestrial planets looked (largely) the same when they were formed. Differences due to geological processes. ● Geological activity is driven by internal heat ● Planetary size plays a large role in retaining heat ● Distance from the Sun, rotation affects erosion ● Crater density can indicate surface age ● Earth has a unique geology Terrestrial Planets ● Compared to Jovian planets: – Smaller size/mass – Large “core” to atmosphere ratio – Higher density – Closer to Sun and closer together – Warmer – Few or no moons – No rings (NASA) Planetary Surfaces and Interiors ● Terrestrial planets + Moon were similar when young – Subjected to heavy bombardment – Differences due to processes that occurred after formation ● Understanding the surface features: planetary geology ● Processes in the interior drive activity at the surface Your book uses “terrestrial worlds” to refer to the terrestrial planets + the Moon. (from Bennett et al.) (from Bennett et al.) How Do We Learn About Planetary Interiors? ● Average density determinations ● Local gravity variations as measured with artificial satellites ● Magnetic fields: molten core/convection ● Lava flow: internal composition ● Earthquakes: internal structure Earthquakes: Seismic Waves ● Earthquakes generate vibrations – Typical wavelength ~ several km – Reconstruct interior ● Two types of waves: – P-waves: compressional waves – S-waves: shear waves ● S-waves cannot pass through liquid (from Bennett et
    [Show full text]
  • Venus Exploration Themes
    Venus Exploration Themes VEXAG Meeting #11 November 2013 VEXAG (Venus Exploration Analysis Group) is NASA’s community‐based forum that provides science and technical assessment of Venus exploration for the next few decades. VEXAG is chartered by NASA Headquarters Science Mission Directorate’s Planetary Science Division and reports its findings to both the Division and to the Planetary Science Subcommittee of NASA’s Advisory Council, which is open to all interested scientists and engineers, and regularly evaluates Venus exploration goals, objectives, and priorities on the basis of the widest possible community outreach. Front cover is a collage showing Venus at radar wavelength, the Magellan spacecraft, and artists’ concepts for a Venus Balloon, the Venus In‐Situ Explorer, and the Venus Mobile Explorer. (Collage prepared by Tibor Balint) Perspective view of Ishtar Terra, one of two main highland regions on Venus. The smaller of the two, Ishtar Terra, is located near the north pole and rises over 11 km above the mean surface level. Courtesy NASA/JPL–Caltech. VEXAG Charter. The Venus Exploration Analysis Group is NASA's community‐based forum designed to provide scientific input and technology development plans for planning and prioritizing the exploration of Venus over the next several decades. VEXAG is chartered by NASA's Solar System Exploration Division and reports its findings to NASA. Open to all interested scientists, VEXAG regularly evaluates Venus exploration goals, scientific objectives, investigations, and critical measurement requirements, including especially recommendations in the NRC Decadal Survey and the Solar System Exploration Strategic Roadmap. Venus Exploration Themes: November 2013 Prepared as an adjunct to the three VEXAG documents: Goals, Objectives and Investigations; Roadmap; as well as Technologies distributed at VEXAG Meeting #11 in November 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Envision – Front Cover
    EnVision – Front Cover ESA M5 proposal - downloaded from ArXiV.org Proposal Name: EnVision Lead Proposer: Richard Ghail Core Team members Richard Ghail Jörn Helbert Radar Systems Engineering Thermal Infrared Mapping Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institute for Planetary Research, Imperial College London, United Kingdom DLR, Germany Lorenzo Bruzzone Thomas Widemann Subsurface Sounding Ultraviolet, Visible and Infrared Spectroscopy Remote Sensing Laboratory, LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, University of Trento, Italy France Philippa Mason Colin Wilson Surface Processes Atmospheric Science Earth Science and Engineering, Atmospheric Physics, Imperial College London, United Kingdom University of Oxford, United Kingdom Caroline Dumoulin Ann Carine Vandaele Interior Dynamics Spectroscopy and Solar Occultation Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, de Nantes, Belgium France Pascal Rosenblatt Emmanuel Marcq Spin Dynamics Volcanic Gas Retrievals Royal Observatory of Belgium LATMOS, Université de Versailles Saint- Brussels, Belgium Quentin, France Robbie Herrick Louis-Jerome Burtz StereoSAR Outreach and Systems Engineering Geophysical Institute, ISAE-Supaero University of Alaska, Fairbanks, United States Toulouse, France EnVision Page 1 of 43 ESA M5 proposal - downloaded from ArXiV.org Executive Summary Why are the terrestrial planets so different? Venus should be the most Earth-like of all our planetary neighbours: its size, bulk composition and distance from the Sun are very similar to those of Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • FIDUCIARY Fi·Du·Ci·Ar·Y {Fy-’Dü-Shē-Er-Ē} — NOUN 1
    National Coalition of Girls’ Schools June 22-24, 2015 | Richmond, VA Sponsored by FIDUCIARY Fi·du·ci·ar·y {fy-’dü-shē-er-ē} — NOUN 1. A duty of loyalty & trust. 2. To act in the best interests of the client. As Financial Advisors, we assume a fi duciary responsibility to put our clients’ needs fi rst. Chuck Procknow | Dev Talvadkar | Your Experts in Independent School Financing 1-800-722-1670 | www.gkbaum.com/is Trudy Hall Terrie Hale Scheckelhoff, Ph.D. Megan Murphy Welcome! Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math plus Art and Design transforms STEM to STEAM. STEAM is everywhere, shaping our everyday lives, and therefore making STEAM education vital to our future – and our students’ futures. STEAM is the core of the technological age in which they live, the key to their best career options, and a critical component of problem-solving and decision-making skills. Adding the “Arts” to STEM is considered by many to be a necessary adjunct to the success of STEM education. Arts education and design thinking encourage creativity, which are essential to innovation. In 2009, the U.S. Department of Labor listed the ten most wanted employees. Eight were ones with degrees in STEM fields: accounting, computer science, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, information sciences and systems, computer engineering, civil engineering, and economics and finance. According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, STEM occupations are growing at 17%, while others are growing at 9.8%. But why is STEAM education even more crucial for girls? Girls’ schools lead the way in graduating women who become our nation’s scientists, doctors, engineers, designers, and inventors.
    [Show full text]
  • Planets Solar System Paper Contents
    Planets Solar system paper Contents 1 Jupiter 1 1.1 Structure ............................................... 1 1.1.1 Composition ......................................... 1 1.1.2 Mass and size ......................................... 2 1.1.3 Internal structure ....................................... 2 1.2 Atmosphere .............................................. 3 1.2.1 Cloud layers ......................................... 3 1.2.2 Great Red Spot and other vortices .............................. 4 1.3 Planetary rings ............................................ 4 1.4 Magnetosphere ............................................ 5 1.5 Orbit and rotation ........................................... 5 1.6 Observation .............................................. 6 1.7 Research and exploration ....................................... 6 1.7.1 Pre-telescopic research .................................... 6 1.7.2 Ground-based telescope research ............................... 7 1.7.3 Radiotelescope research ................................... 8 1.7.4 Exploration with space probes ................................ 8 1.8 Moons ................................................. 9 1.8.1 Galilean moons ........................................ 10 1.8.2 Classification of moons .................................... 10 1.9 Interaction with the Solar System ................................... 10 1.9.1 Impacts ............................................ 11 1.10 Possibility of life ........................................... 12 1.11 Mythology .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander T. Basilevsky
    1 CURRICULUM VITAE Alexander T. Bazilevskiy (in publications use spelling Basilevsky) Born: 4 October, 1937 in Voronezh, Russia Education and Scientific Degrees: 1959, Master of Science in Geology, Voronezh State University, Voronezh. 1968, Doctor of Philosophy in Geochemistry, Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow. 1986, Doctor of Sciences in Geochemistry and Planetary Science, Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow. 2007, Professor in Geochemistry, Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow. Professional Career 1954-1959, Student of Geological Department of Voronezh State University, Voronezh; 1959-1963, Junior Geologist, Geologist, Senior Geologist of the Geologic Mapping Expedition, Geologic Office of Central Regions, USSR Ministry of Geology and Protection of Earth Interiors, Moscow; 1:200,000 Geologic mapping in Moscow, Tambov, Vladimir and Voronezh provinces; 1963-1966, PhD Student of Geological Department of Moscow State University, Moscow; Experimental petrology of mafic and ultramafic rocks; 1966-1968, Senior Geologist of the Geologic Mapping Expedition, Geologic Office of Central Regions, USSR Ministry of Geology and Protection of Earth Interiors, Moscow; Geochemical Prospecting for Ore Deposits in Belgorod, Kursk, Lipetsk and Voronezh provinces of Central Russia; 1968-1975, Junior Scientist, Senior Scientist of Institute for Space Research, USSR Academy of Sciences,
    [Show full text]