DOCSLIB.ORG

BP10 Integration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BP10 Integration Sava River Basin Management Plan Sava River Basin Management Plan Background paper No. 9 Integration of water protection with other developments in the Sava River Basin (Floods, Navigation, Hydropower, Agriculture) version 3.0 Zagreb November 2011 Sava River Basin Management Plan Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 5 2 Linking Flood Risk Management and River Basin Management in the Sava River Basin .......................................................................................... 5 2.1 Background .................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Setting the scene ........................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Floods in the Sava RB .................................................................................................. 8 2.4 Flood management in the Sava RB ......................................................................... 9 2.4.1 Floodplains ................................................................................................................. 9 2.4.2 Flood defences ........................................................................................................... 9 2.4.3 Targets and measures ......................................................................................... 11 2.5 EU Directive on an assessment and management of flood risks .............. 11 2.6 Linking EFD to RBM – potential impacts on ecological status ................... 11 2.7 The way ahead ........................................................................................................... 14 2.8 Best practices to achieve the environmental objectives ............................. 15 2.9 Conclusions ................................................................................................................. 16 2.10 References ................................................................................................................... 17 3 Navigation in the Sava River Basin ........................................................... 18 3.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 18 3.2 Sources of information ............................................................................................ 19 3.2.1 International level ................................................................................................ 19 3.2.2 National / Sub – basin level ............................................................................... 20 3.3 Recommendation for future actions .................................................................. 20 3.4 Future status of navigation .................................................................................... 21 3.4.1 Transport needs .................................................................................................... 21 3.4.2 Design/construction criteria ............................................................................ 24 3.4.3 Further development of planned works ...................................................... 25 3.5 References ................................................................................................................... 28 4 Hydropower and River Basin Management ........................................... 30 4.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 30 4.2 Setting the scene ........................................................................................................ 30 Background paper on Integration of water protection with other developments in the Sava RB, 2 Sava River Basin Management Plan 4.3 Hydropower and its impacts on the river basin management in the Sava River Basin ........................................................................................................ 30 4.3.1 Hydropower in the Sava River Basin ............................................................. 30 4.3.2 Impacts on longitudinal continuity and habitat interruption ............. 31 4.3.3 Hydrological alterations ..................................................................................... 32 4.3.4 Water use ................................................................................................................. 33 4.3.5 Future infrastructure projects ......................................................................... 33 4.4 Interactions between hydropower and RBM .................................................. 37 4.5 Notes on hydropower development under the WFD .................................... 38 4.6 Conclusions ................................................................................................................. 41 4.7 References ................................................................................................................... 43 5 Integration of water protection with agriculture in the Sava River Basin ........................................................................................................ 44 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 44 5.1.1 General overview .................................................................................................. 44 5.1.2 Status of agricultural sector in the Sava River Basin .............................. 46 5.2 Pressures and impacts from agriculture on the water status ................... 46 5.2.1 Fertilizers and livestock manure .................................................................... 47 5.2.2 Pesticides .................................................................................................................. 50 5.2.3 Organic pollutants and pathogens .................................................................. 51 5.2.4 Heavy metals ........................................................................................................... 52 5.2.5 Atmospheric decomposition and biological nitrogen fixation ............ 52 5.3 Measures towards integrated RBM management in the Sava RB ............ 53 5.3.1 Technical measures .............................................................................................. 53 5.3.2 Non-technical measures ..................................................................................... 54 5.3.3 Economic instruments ........................................................................................ 55 List of Tables List of Figures Background paper on Integration of water protection with other developments in the Sava RB, 3 Sava River Basin Management Plan List of Tables Table 1: Forecast throughput: new ports of Zagreb (Rugvica) and Brežice ............... 24 Table 2: Prioritized list of projects, studies and policy actions ....................................... 27 Table 3: Basic data on hydropower plants in the Sava River Basin (2005) ................ 32 Table 4: Average nutrient excretion coefficients per head of animal ........................... 48 Table 5: Total number of livestock in the Sava countries .................................................. 48 Table 6: Total amount of Nitrogen production via animal manure in the Sava RB . 48 Table 7: Total amount of Phosphorous production via animal manure in the Sava RB ........................................................................................................................................... 49 List of Figures Figure 1: Indicative map of important flood prone areas along the Sava River (SRBA Report, 2009) ............................................................................................................... 8 Figure 2: Cumulative traffic volume per main segment (minimum and maximum estimated volumes for year 2027) .................................................................................. 23 Figure 3: SCC requirements for a class IV and class Va waterway......................................... 25 Figure 4: General Action Plan implementation lines ................................................................... 26 Figure 5: CAP and EU WFD interlinkage .......................................................................................... 45 Figure 6: OECD elements in calculation of gross nutrient balance ........................................ 50 Background paper on Integration of water protection with other developments in the Sava RB, 4 Sava River Basin Management Plan 1 Introduction A central objective of the WFD is to improve integration between environmental, eco- nomic and social aspects of water management, striking a balance between the often competing claims. This requires more effective coordination between water manage- ment and other sector policies. Hydropower, navigation, agriculture and flood defence are recognised in the EU as important and legitimate water uses policies and initiatives. Therefore within the WFD implementation in the EU a process to secure a better inte- gration of environmental objectives with other policies was initiated. Each sector represents a driver imposing pressures on the water bodies which may cause failure to achieve the environmental objectives. Therefore it is of particular impor- tance that environmental requirements are considered as an integral part of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Koste Glavinića 8A, 11000 Belgrade
    Koste Glavinića 8a, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia Phone: +381 11 3691 477 Fax: +381 11 3690 823 http://www.ieent.org Company Information GENERAL In the year 2006 it has been 150 years since the birth of Nikola Tesla scientist, inventor and visionary, whose work have changed the world and significantly contributed development and speed progress of manhood and electrical engineering. At the same time, it has been 70 years since the president of Serbian Royal Academy of sciences, Mr Bogdan Gavrilovic, declared the establishment of Institute "Nikola Tesla" - "as a temple of science in the glory of his name and eternal beauty of his work". In its history that lasts more than seven decades, Institute passed through great number of changes and transformations in order to accommodate to changes in its surrounding and during that time changed its name and working area. Today, Electrical Engineering Institute "Nikola Tesla" is independent scientific - research joint - stock organization (98% owned by state, 2% owned by small shareholders) which activity covers a wide spectra of problems in the area of production, transmission, distribution and implementation of electrical energy. Nikola Tesla Institute Building At Koste Glavinića 8a St. in Belgrade 1 Company Information R&D PROFILE Our R&D profile presents synthesis of scientific and expert knowledge across a wide spectrum of disciplines: energy, high voltage, high power electronics, automation, computer science, measurement, information systems, and software engineering. By synthesis of scientific and engineering knowledge and experience Institute become admirable and authoritative scientific institution in our country and abroad in the area of electrical engineering, always ready to answer to the challenges of modern science and at the same time to respond to the necessities of domestic economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Investing to Integrate Europe & Ensure Security of Supply PE
    11/20/2014 Public enterprise "Electric power industry of Serbia" Europe‘s 8th energy region: Investing to integrate Europe & ensure security of supply Brussels, 19th November 2014 PE EPS is nearly a sole player in the Serbian electricity market Hydro power 2,835 MW plants Thermal power 5,171 MW* 3,936 MW** plants Combined heat and power 353 MW plants Total 8,359 MW* 7,124 MW** Electricity 37.5 TWh** Production Number of 3.5 mil ** customers Number of 33,335** employees Last power plant built in 1991. *With K&M ** Without K&M, end of 2013 As of June 1999 PE EPS does not operate its Kosovo and Metohija capacities (K&M) 2 1 11/20/2014 EPS facing 1200MW capacity decommissioning until 2025 Due to aging fleet and strict EU environmental regulations1 Net available EPS generation capacity, MW Successful negotiation about 8,000 -1,218 MW LCPD and IED implementation 20 eased the timing of lignite 7,239 25 111 decommissioning 208 210 630 100 6,021 6,000 20 25 280 Old gas-fired CHP capacity decommissioning 612 • Current Novi Sad gas/oil CHP (210 MW) and EPS small HPPs 1,200 Zrenjanin gas/oil CHP (111 MW) to terminate CHP SREMSKA MITROVICA - 321 MW 1,230 production CHP ZRENJANIN 4,000 CHP NOVI SAD 1,560 TPP MORAVA Old lignite-fired capacity decommissioning 1,239 (capacities to be closed in 2023 latest and to operate TPP KOLUBARA 211 20ths hours in total between 2018-20231) 211 TPP KOSTOLAC B TPP KOSTOLAC A 1,126 • Kolubara A1-3, A5 (208 MW) 1,126 2,000 • Nikola Tesla A1-2 (360 MW) TPP NIKOLA TESLA B • Kostolac A1-2 (280 MW) TPP NIKOLA TESLA A HPP
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying CO2 Abatement Costs in Serbian Power Sector in 2014
    Quantifying CO2 abatement costs in Serbian power sector in 2014. [Document Subtitle] Aleksandar Macura RES Foundation T: +381 (0)11 218 8897 Matični broj: 28828357 Zmaja od Noćaja T: +381 (0)11 2910362 PIB: 108822050 3a www.resfoundation.org Račun broj: 11000 Beograd 275001022539489576 Table of Contents TABLE OF TABLES 2 TABLE OF FIGURES 3 1 DISCLAIMER 5 2 INTRODUCTION 6 3 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 7 4 BASIC PLANT DATA- 2014 12 5 DEVELOPMENTS IN 2014. 13 6 ELECTRICITY AND COAL BALANCES 14 6.1 ELECTRICITY BALANCES 14 6.1.1 ELECTRICITY IMPORTS AND EXPORTS DATA AND EXPLANATIONS 15 6.2 COAL BALANCES 17 7 CO2 BALANCES 18 7.1 GHG EMISSIONS IN SERBIA 18 7.2 AVOIDED EMISSIONS IN 2014 19 8 POWER SECTOR FINANCIAL DATA 19 9 CALCULATION OF ABATEMENT COSTS 22 9.1 METHODOLOGY DESCRIPTION 22 9.1.1 ADDITIONAL NET IMPORT COSTS 25 9.1.2 AVOIDED ELECTRICITY PURCHASES 26 9.1.3 LOST PROFIT 28 9.2 RESULTS 29 TABLE OF TABLES TABLE 1 EPS NET OUTPUT PLANT CAPACITY (MW). SOURCE: EPS .......................................................... 12 TABLE 2 2014. ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION OF EPS POWER PLANTS. SOURCE: EPS ........................ 12 TABLE 3 ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION IN SERBIA IN THE PERIOD FROM 2008. TO 2014. .............. 14 TABLE 4 ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION IN SERBIA IN THE PERIOD FROM 2008. TO 2014. ........... 15 TABLE 5 ELECTRICITY EXPORTS AND IMPORTS IN SERBIA. SOURCE: STATISTICAL OFFICE ...... 16 TABLE 6 NET ELECTRICITY IMPORTS . SOURCES: STATISTICAL OFFICE (RZS), REGULATORY ENERGY AGENCY (AERS), ELECTRICAL UTILITY (EPS), TRANSMISSION UTILITY (EMS) .... 17 TABLE 7 COAL BALANCES IN THE YEARS 2008-2014. .................................................................................... 17 2 Quantifying CO2 abatement costs in Serbian power sector in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Security of Supply I: Generation Adequacy in Serbia And
    SecuritySecurity ofof supplysupply I:I: GenerationGeneration adequacyadequacy inin SerbiaSerbia andand SEESEE Harrisburg, 31 March 2008 1 MainMain PurposePurpose ofof thethe presentationpresentation z Describe elements for Generation Adequacy in Serbia and SEE z How to fulfill requests for Security of supply z Generation capacity production forecast 2 ContentsContents z ObjectivesObjectives andand overviewoverview ofof powerpower systemsystem planningplanning inin SerbiaSerbia andand SEESEE z ComplianceCompliance withwith EUEU legislationlegislation z ForecastingForecasting electricityelectricity demanddemand (annual,(annual, varying,varying, peak)peak) z CapacityCapacity mechanismsmechanisms toto stabilizestabilize thethe generationgeneration volumesvolumes z PowerPower productionproduction capacitycapacity reportingreporting byby generators,generators, interfaceinterface withwith thethe transmissiontransmission gridgrid z GenerationGeneration plantplant availabilityavailability (scheduled(scheduled maintenance,maintenance, forcedforced outages)outages) o BasicBasic modelingmodeling approachesapproaches o SpecialSpecial modelingmodeling forfor variablevariable (wind)(wind) generationgeneration o ProcessProcess ofof commissioningcommissioning newnew generationgeneration capacitycapacity 3 ObjectivesObjectives andand overviewoverview ofof powerpower systemsystem planningplanning inin SerbiaSerbia andand SEESEE 4 SEESEE GeneratingGenerating SourcesSources -- 20052005 5 SEESEE PeakPeak demanddemand andand sources:sources: 20052005--20202020
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Erica Bach PCM Officer Project Complaint Mechanism European Bank for Reconstruction and Development 1 Exchange Square London, UK
    Ms Erica Bach PCM Officer Project Complaint Mechanism European Bank for Reconstruction and Development 1 Exchange Square London, UK 25th April 2017 Dear Ms Bach, CEE Bankwatch Network and CEKOR are hereby requesting a compliance review for the EPS Restructuring project (#47318). Although the investment is on corporate level and not directed at specific physical assets, the project has caused harm and has the potential to cause further harm due to “freeing up resources to allow the Company to focus on and boost the implementation of its long term capital expenditure program”1 which includes lignite mine expansion and construction of several thermal power plants, the most advanced one being the Kostolac B3 TPP. The EBRD has provided technical cooperation to EPS and has put great effort into monitoring and helping EPS develop a strategic approach to managing environmental and social issues. It has requested its client to do regular corporate audits of each of its subsidiary companies and develop costed action plans. However, these improvements have not achieved full implementation by EPS of the EBRD’s E&S standards, which has resulted in continued negative impacts on air quality and harm to communities in mining basins living in unacceptable environmental conditions and bearing significant health and safety risks. Moreover, in the absence of EPS’s plans to decarbonise in the foreseeable future, the climate impact of EPS’s capital expenditure programme is questionable. The EBRD has failed to ensure the resettlement of mining-impacted communities and to assess the strategic impact of its investments on Serbia’s energy sector, and how it could impact the sector’s reliance on lignite, the most polluting of fossil fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • ' Б Thermal Power Plant " Nikola Tesla'' B
    1 • Термоелектрана ,,Никола Тесла’’ Б Thermal Power Plant " Nikola Tesla'' B The Corporate Enterprise Thermal Power Plant “ Nikola Tesla'’ Ltd. Obrenovac Thermal Power Plant '' Nikola Tesla'' B Thermal Power Plant “ Nikola Tesla'' B is the branch of Corporate Enterprise TPP “ Nikola Tesla'' Ltd. Obrenovac. TENT B is situated on the right bank of the Sava River, 50 kilometers west of Belgrade and 17 kilometers upstream of TENT A. It consists of two largest energy Units in Serbia, with the designed capacity of the 620 MW, and they are in operation since 1983 (TENT B1),and 1985 (TENT B2). The Units’ power will amount to 2 x 667.5 MW after the revitalization. 2 The first studies on the selection of sites for construction were made in the period from 1972 until 1974. Decision on the implementation of the construction of this power plant was brought by the Joint electric -commercial enterprise "Belgrade" early in 1975, and the funds for construction were provided in 1976. This was followed by the design and supply of equipment for these two units. Civil work started in the spring in 1978, the Installation of steel construction of the first unit a year later, so the unit B1 was commissioned on November, 3, 1983, while the unit B2 was connected to the grid on November, 28, 1985. The location area of TENT B is 156 acres and belongs to the village of Usce and Skela at the altitude of 77.7 meters. All buildings are constructed just near the regional road Obrenovac- Sabac, except for the ash landfill of 600 acres, which is situated 4 kilometers south-east of TENT B.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential of Miscanthus × Giganteus for Heavy Metals Removing from Industrial Deposol
    DOI: 10.1515/aree-2017-0009 Gordana Dražić et al. Acta Regionalia et Environmentalica 2/2017 Acta Regionalia et Environmentalica 2 Nitra, Slovaca Universitas Agriculturae Nitriae, 2017, pp. 56–58 POTENTIAL OF MISCANTHUS × GIGANTEUS FOR HEAVY METALS REMOVING FROM INDUSTRIAL DEPOSOL Gordana DražIć*, Jelena MiloVanoVIć, Slobodan StefanoVIć, Ivana Petrić Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia Agro-energy crop, Miscanthus × giganteus should be produced on marginal land in order to avoid land suitable for food production. Production of electricity in thermal power plants occupies large land areas by depositing tailings from surface mines, and depositing ash and slag. During the first year of Miscanthus × giganteus growing in containers, the concentration of heavy metals: As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, Zn and Fe was monitored in underground and aboveground plant parts. The substrate was overburden from open pit coal mine RB Kolubara and ash from TPP Nikola Tesla B. Significant differences were found between the substrate and the investigated elements, but in all cases the accumulated heavy metals almost completely remained stable in underground organs of plant. It can be concluded that biomass of Miscanthus × giganteus could be used as energy source if it is grown on a soil moderately contaminated by heavy metals. Keywords: agro-energy crop, heavy metals, Miscanthus × giganteus, biomass Soil contaminated by heavy metals requires reclamation, because it cannot be used in typical agricultural Material and methods production such as food or fodder. These activities contribute to restoring ecosystem services of marginal land Pot experiment was performed with Miscanthus × giganteus (Nsanganwimana et al., 2014). A good way of contaminated grown on Gleysol, ash from disposal of the thermal Power soils management seems to be their use under energy crops Plant Nikola Tesla B, Obrenovac, and overburden from open cultivation (Gomes, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • SERBIA FLOODS 2014 Worst Flooding in Over a Century
    Three months' worth of rain fell on the region in just a few days, causing Sava and Kolubara rivers to burst their banks and sweep into people's homes. SERBIA FLOODS 2014 Worst flooding in over a century www.hidmet.gov.rs Slobodan Sovilj www.meteoalarm.rs [email protected] Republic Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia Introduction Every year, disasters related to meteorological, hydrological and climate hazards cause significant loss of life, and set back economic and social development by years, if not decades. Extreme rainfall during April and May 2014 cause in parts of Serbia worst flooding in over a century. The disaster has made evident a number of vulnerabilities of the Serbian population and economy that – in view of climate change – deserve special attention and require the reduction of disaster risks. Content: - Synoptic situation; - NWP products; - RHMSS Warning Activities; - Overview of total amount of rainfall; - Hydrological situation during May 2014; - SERBIA worst affected areas; - Emergency situation in Serbia; - Concluding remarks. Republic Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia Synoptic situation On 13 May, a low-pressure area formed over the Adriatic Sea, as polar air from Central Europe penetrated into the Mediterranean basin. The cold polar air mass met with humid subtropical air, leading to strong low pressure development. 13 May 2014 On 14 May, the low moved over the Balkans, becoming stationary. As a result, extremely heavy rain fell within the region - Serbia and the North of Bosnia-Herzegovina were most affected. Republic Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia NWP products ECMWF EPS Control Total weekly precipitation for 12th -18th May 2014 In performing a wide range of tasks in short to medium range weather forecasts and seasonal to long-term climate prediction, RHMSS in its forecasting operative work utilise the products and data of WMO Global Producing Centres, WRF-NMM Daily precipitation for EUMETSAT, as well as 15th and 16th May data and products from its own NWP and climate model suits.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbian Rail Cargo Study
    Serbian rail cargo transport market Final report 10 June 2020 Preface This study was prepared by the consortium of Compass Lexecon and Karanović & Partners on behalf of the World Bank Group and the Commission for Protection of Competition of the Republic of Serbia. The study is a part of the Serbia Investment Climate Program. The Serbia Investment Climate Program is implemented by the IFC in partnership with the UK Good Governance Fund and the British Embassy in Belgrade. The study was written by Gregor Langus, Vilen Lipatov and Guido Paolini (Compass Lexecon), Bojan Vučković, Leonid Ristev, Srđan Dabetić, Igor Radovanović and Stefan Savić (Karanović & Partners). A team comprised of Maciej Drozd, Igor Nikolić, Eugeniu Osmochescu, Olga Šipka (World Bank Group). Representatives from the Commission for Protection of Competition supervised and reviewed the draft. Representatives from the Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure and the Railways Directorate also provided comments on the study. Acknowledgement We would like to thank for cooperation and support to Vida Jerković, Miloš Stanojević, Lazar Radaković and Misela Nikolić from the Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure; Zorica Radović from Railways Directorate; representatives of Serbia Cargo and Serbian Railways Infrastructure for supplying necessary information for the market analysis and for participating in interviews; representatives of Kombinovani prevoz, Eurorail and Milšped for cooperation and interviews; all market participants that provided responses
    [Show full text]
  • Submission Via Electronic
    Submission Via Electronic Mai June 2012 Project Complaint Mechanism Attn: PCM Officer European Bank for Reconstruction and Development – EBRD One Exchange Square London EC2A 2JN, United Kingdom Email: [email protected] COMPLAINT OF ES "VREOCI" AND COUNCIL OF MZ VREOCI IN EBRD'S PROJECT COMPLAINT MECHANISM PARTIES Complainants ES "Vreoci" – Ecological Society "Vreoci" is an association founded in 1991. The main goals of ES "Vreoci" are: the improvement of environmental protection, education of citizens, especially young people about the importance of preserving and protecting the environment, organizing activities supporting the rehabilitation of affected areas, as well as advocating for the acceptance of good practices regarding the use and preservation of natural resources and the proper treatment of waste material. The bodies of the association are the general assembly, the managing board and supervisory board. The office of ES "Vreoci" is in the Cultural Hall in Vreoci. [2] Member of society can be anybody who accepts society's aims and statute. ES "Vreoci" finances its activities through membership fees, donations, gifts and other sources, and can obtain funds from sale of recyclable materials collected in the environment clean-up actions or from the products of educational workshops. The association has about 600 voting members. Managing board has 11 members, the chairman of the board represents the association. Chairman of the board is Gordana Kulić. [2] The largest actions of ES "Vreoci" so far were: the blockade of railway line Vreoci–Obrenovac in 2003, demanding immediate improvement of environmental conditions in Vreoci, in which MZ Vreoci and almost all the inhabitants of the settlement Vreoci (see below) participated; protests joined by MZ Vreoci and a large number of citizens (see below) to mark the beginning of violent Hereafter: Nubers in angular brackets refer to source listed at the end of this Complaint.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTRACT FICHE: May 2009
    EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION TO THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA CONTRACT FICHE Programme: IPA – Energy Environment Programme Serbia Year: 2011 CRIS Contract Number: 2014 / 347-153 Contract Title: Construction of Waste Water Treatment Facilities in TPP Nikola Tesla A, Serbia Start date: 13/10/2014 End date of activities: 12/07/2016 Final date for implementation (FDI): 27/01/2019 Contracted amount: 5,994,340.50 € Location: Obrenovac Operations sector: Energy Complementary contracts € million CARDS 2002 Major overhaul of Unit A3 of Nikola Oct 03 April 05 64.5 Tesla power plant CARDS 2003 Study of pollution from thermal power Sept 03 Sept 04 0.75 stations in Serbia and on pollution mitigation measures and their costs CARDS 2003 Major overhaul of Unit A5 of Nikola Nov 04 Dec 05 58 Tesla power plant CARDS 2004 Environmental clean up measures Mar 06 Sept 10 35 (based on the study undertaken under the 2003 programme) (Electrostatic precipitators at Kostolac A and ash transport and storage at Nikola Tesla B power plant). Oct 09 Nov 11 €11M IPA 2007 219- Emission Reduction from Nikola Tesla 517 Thermal Power Plant in Obrenovac - upgrade of the Electrostatic Precipitator System which reduces the particulate emissions from Units A6 and B2. July 2011 Dec 2013 €8 M IPA 2008 268- Design and Works contract for the 893 Emission Reduction from Nikola Tesla Thermal Power Plant, Unit B1 Total €177.25 1 13/09/2016 EUROPEAN UNION DELEGATION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION TO THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Description: The project “Construction of Waste Water Treatment Facility at TPP Nikola Tesla A at the Electric Power Industry of Serbia (EPS)” significantly reduces the influence of wastewaters, which have huge health implications for the nearby population, by reducing the concentration of relevant pollutants (fuel oil, mineral oils, suspended solids, heavy metals, Biochemical Oxygen Demand), so that they are in accordance with EU directives and the National and local legislation and regulations at the WWTP outlet, leading to an improvement in water quality around the TPP.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Investigations of Pulverized Coal Combustion … THERMAL SCIENCE: Year 2019, Vol
    Stefanović, P. Lj., et al.: Review of the Investigations of Pulverized Coal Combustion … THERMAL SCIENCE: Year 2019, Vol. 23, Suppl. 5, pp. S1611-S1626 S1611 REVIEW OF THE INVESTIGATIONS OF PULVERIZED COAL COMBUSTION PROCESSES IN LARGE POWER PLANTS IN LABORATORY FOR THERMAL ENGINEERING AND ENERGY – PART B by Predrag Lj. STEFANOVI]*, Dejan B. CVETINOVI], Zoran J. MARKOVI], Mili} D. ERI], Simeon N. OKA, and Branislav S. REPI] Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia Review paper https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI19S5611R Paper presents short review of research problems, applied methods for solving problems and main results obtained by the researchers in Laboratory for Ther- mal Engineering and Energy (LTE) of the "Vinča" Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia dealing with pulverized coal combustion processes and tech- nologies for reduction of pollutions problems at thermal power plants in a period since 2000. The presented results were published in numerous studies realized for different users, Ph. D., Masters, and Specialist thesis, in international and domestic scientific journals and monographs, presented at numerous internation- al and domestic scientific conferences, etc. Presented research projects and re- sults of applied research projects realized at pulverized coal combustion thermal power plants clearly show that LTE team was involved in key activities of reha- bilitation and modernization, including implementation of best available technol- ogies for pollution reduction at thermal power plants, in the region of South East Europe. Keywords: pulverized coal, combustion, boiler, diagnostics, burner, slagging, modelling, thermal power plants, pollution reduction technologies Introduction Thermal power plants (TPP) on lignite and their technological systems in the South- Eastern Europe (SEE) countries are relatively old.
    [Show full text]