Josip Broz Tito Sabrana Djela

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Josip Broz Tito Sabrana Djela ODBOR ZA IZDAVANJE SABRANIH DJELA JOSIPA BROZA TITA Liubčo Arsov, predsjednik, [dr Vladimir Bakarić, Anka Berus, I Rodoljub čolakovic,! RadivojT)avidović, Stane Dolanc, Veselin Đuranović, Aslan Fazlija, Slavko Janevski, Lazar Koliševski, Nandor Major, Petar Matić, [Miha MarinkoJ dr Miroslav Pečujlić, dr Ivan Perić, dr Pavle Savić, Petar Štambolić, Lidija Šentjurc, Franc Šetinc, dr Mijat Šuković, dr Marko Šunjić, dr Arif Tanović, Fabijan Treo, Mihajlo Zvicer, Drago Vukša, sekretar Odbora JOSIP BROZ TITO - SABRANA DJELA REDAKCIJA ZA IZDAVANJE SABRANIH DJELA JOSIPA BROZA TITA David Atlagić, Ismail Bajra, dr Dušan Bilandžić, dr Drago Borovčanin, dr Milovan Bosić, Slobodan Bosiljčić, (dr Velimir Brezovski, dr Pero Damjanović, dr Tone Ferenc, ar Branislav (jTigorijević, zamjenik glavnog i odgovornog urednika, dr Danilo Kecić, dr Milan Matić, Veljko Miladinović, Pero Morača, dr Ivan Perić, dr Branko Petranović, dr Nikola Popović, zamjenik glavnog i odgovornog urednika, dr Miljan Radović, dr Stanislav Stojanović, Fabijan Trgo GLAVNI I ODGOVORNI UREDNIK dr Pero Damjanović SEKRETAR REDAKCIJE dr Enes Milak NAUČNA p r i p r e m a INSTITUT ZA SAVREMENU ISTORIJU BEOGRAD TOM 20 Istraživanja, napomene, hronologija i priprema za štampu DIMITRIJE BRAJUŠKOVIĆ JOSIP BROZ TITO SABRANA DJELA TOM DVADESETI 16. APRIL — 30. JUN 1944. IZDAVAČKI CENTAR »KOMUNIST«, BEOGRAD BEOGRADSKI IZDAVAČKO-GRAFIČKI ZAVOD, BEOGRAD IZDAVAČKO KNJIŽARSKO PODUZEČE »NAPRIJED«. ZAGREB BEOGRAD 1984. VIII juna stvorile i održale mostobran s preko 900(XX) svojih vojnika, čime su stvoreni uslovi za dalje uspješno savezničko nastupanje i na tom frontu. Na jugoslovenskom ratištu još nije postojala čvrsta linija fronta, ali su se po Titovim naređenjima, uputstvima i direktivama oformljavala sve izrazitija vojišta. U Sloveniji je 7. korpus NOVJ od druge polovine aprila do kraja maja 1944. proširio slobodnu teritoriju u Dolenjskoj i prenio borbe u rejon Iga, nedaleko od Ljubljane, a zatim u junu usmjerio težište borbi na razaranju željezničkih pruga Ljubljana — Trst i Ljubljana — Novo Mesto. Jedinice iz sastava njemačke Grupe armija »C« nisu uspjele da takva dejstva spriječe, niti, pak, da razbiju 9. korpus NOVJ u Vipavskoj dolini i odbace ga iz Gorenjske i onemoguće razaranje željezničke pruge Jesenice — Gorica — Trst. Čak i u Štajerskoj, koju su njemačke snage s posebnom upornošću čuvale iz bojazni da se ne rasplamsa pokret otpora i u Austriji, jedinice 4. operativne zone Glavnog štaba NOV i PO Slovenije su na sektoru Mozirskih planina odbile više neprijateljevih napada, a diverzijama osjetno remetile njemački saobraćaj između Celja i Maribora. U Hrvatskoj su jedinice NOVJ djelimične uspjehe njemačkih ofanziv- nih poduhvata u daljim borbama dovodile do potpunog neuspjeha ili prenosile borbe na nova područja. Osmi korpus NOVJ sve do 31. maja sprečavao je jedinicama njemačkog 15. brdskog armijskog korpusa da ovladaju obalskim rubom od ostrva Silbe do Kornata, pa i tada presječenu vezu s ostrvom Visom, 8. korpus je ubrzo ponovo uspostavio. Istovremeno su s utvrđenog ostrva Visa jedinice 8. korpusa i Mornarice NOVJ samostalno, ili s dijelovima savezničkih komandosa izvodile uspješne desantne prepade na ostrva Mljet, Korčulu, Šoltu i Brač. U Lici su jače snage njemačkog 15. brdskog armijskog korpusa od 28. aprila do 16. maja ofanzivnom operacijom »Morgenštern« ovladale Krbavskim poljem i Korenicom, ali je ubrzo 11. korpus NOVJ povratio izgubljene rejone. Međutim, on nije blagovremeno prozreo da je to bila i prikrivena koncentracija njemačkih snaga, koje će s tog pravca nastupati u predstojećoj operaciji »Reselšprung« — (»Konjički skok«) — drvarskoj operaciji. Slično je bilo i s 4. korpusom NOVJ prilikom napada jedinica njemačkog 5. SS brdskog armijskog korpusa na Topusko, Vojnić i Slunj, kojima su njemačke snage ovladale do 26. maja. Protivnapadom je 4. koprus povratio sva ta mjesta, ali ni on nije uočio prikrivenu koncentraciju njemačkih snaga za nastupanje s tog pravca u operaciji »Reselšprung«. Taj korpus je i u junu nastavio ofanzivna dejstva i usmjerio ih na tri odvojena sektora: u Pokuplju, u zahvatu komunikacije Zagreb — Karlovac i u zahvatu komunikacija koje od Bihaća vode za Sisak i za Karlovac. U Istri su dijelovi njemačke Grupe armija »C« pokušali da unište jedinice Operativnog štaba NOVJ za Istru, ali su ove u borbama vođenim na planini Učki krajem aprila i početkom maja izbjegle udar njemačkih snaga i prodrle na planinu Nanos, a odatle nastavile uspješna dejstva, popunile jedinice novim borcima ili. juna obnovile 2. istarsku NO brigadu. U Hrvatskom Zagorju su na 10. korpus NOVJ, koji je ugrožavao neposredne prilaze Zagrebu, a naročito komunikacije koje vode preko sjeverne Hrvatske k Austriji i južnoj Mađarskoj, povele sredinom maja ofanzivu njemačke i ustaško-domobranske snage, ali je korpus najprije pružio snažan otpor, a zatim manjim snagama prešao u manevarsku odbranu, a glavninom prodro na Kalnik, zatim na Bilo-goru i u Moslavinu, odakle je sredinom juna poveo ofanzivna dejstva i stvorio novu slobodnu teritoriju. Takođe je i u Slavoniji protiv 6. korpusa NOVJ, koji je stavio pod udar magistralu Zagreb — Beograd i pojačao dejstva na sektor Virovitica — Daruvar, krajem aprila uslijedila njemačko-ustaška ofanziva. Međutim, korpus je dijelom snaga poveo manevarsku odbranu i do sredine maja doveo do neuspjeha neprijateljev poduhvat, a istovremeno je s jednom divizijom prodro u Moslavinu i nastavio ofanzivna dejstva. Istočna Bosna, gdje su dejstvovali 3. korpus NOVJ i dvije divizije Glavnog štaba NOV i PO Vojvodine, bila je stalno poprište intenzivnih borbi. Tamo su jedinice iz sastava njemačke 2. oklopne armije, kojima je povremeno sadejstvovao i dio snaga Vojnoupravnog komandanta Srbije, veoma energičnim napadima sprečavale jedinica­ ma NOVJ izbijanje na Drinu i nastojale da ih odbace što dalje od Srbije. U tome su privremeno i uspjele, ali nisu mogle spriječiti da se u istočnoj Bosni prikupe i manevarskom odbranom održi pet divizija NOVJ. U Crnoj Gori, Sandžaku i Hercegovini je 2.korpus NOVJ takođe vodio veoma teške borbe. Najžešće su bile u zahvatu Limske doline. I tamo su snage iz sastava njemačke 2. oklopne armije i dijelovi jedinica Vojnoupravnog komandanta Srbije u ofanzivnim poduhvati­ ma vođenim tokom čitave druge polovine aprila i u prvoj polovini juna pokušavale da likvidiraju limski mostobran. Međutim, 2. korpus je glavninom svojih snaga u veoma oštrim borbama razbio neprijatelj­ ske snage i odbranio limski mostobran, na kome je u drugoj polovini maja prihvatio Udarnu grupu divizija NOVJ, koja se iscrpena stalnim borbama i marševima povukla iz zapadne Srbije. U Srbiji se uspješno razvijala NOB uglavnom samo u njenom jugoistočnom dijelu. Tako je Glavni štab NOV i PO Srbije, pored već postojećih 9 južnomoravskih brigada, od sredine aprila do kraja juna 1944. formirao u južnomoravskom regionu još 10 brigada, koje je sve uključio u prvih pet srpskih divizija NOVJ. Samo jednu od tih divizija je Glavni štab zadržao da štiti slobodnu teritoriju u Pustoj reci i Jablanici, a ostale je usmjerio u tri operativna pravca: dvije prema Kopaoniku u susret snagama NOVJ koje će poći iz Crne Gore s limskog mostobrana; jednu prema Vranju i planini Kozjaku da se poveže s jedinicama Glavnog štaba NOV i PO Makedonije i da povedu zajedničku borbu; jednu diviziju je uputio k istočnoj Srbiji da razbije tamošnje okupatorsko-kvislinške jedinice i ojača NOB. Njihova dejstva su ugrozila glavne komunikacijske pravce koji vode kroz Srbiju, pa je Vojnoupravni komandant Srbije njemački general Hans Gustav Felber objedinio sve postojeće vojne formacije neprija­ teljski raspoložene prema NOP-u i pod njemačkim rukovodstvom uputio ih u ofanzivne poduhvate protiv jedinica Glavnog štaba NOV i PO Srbije. Međutim, svi su se ti poduhvati u krajnjem ishodu završili bezuspješno. U zapadnoj Srbiji vodila je veoma teške borbe Udarna grupa divizija NOVJ protiv višestruko nadmoćnijih neprijateljevih snaga, koje je protiv nje lično poveo general Hans Gustav Felber. Prinuđena da nekoliko puta mijenja pravac svoga nastupanja, Udarna grupa divizija NOVJ napokon se s ogranaka planine Maljena preko Zlatibora i Zlatara sredinom druge polovine maja prebacila na slobodnu teritori­ ju 2. korpusa NOVJ u dolini Lima. U ostalim dijelovima Srbije — Mačvi, Pocerini, Rađevini, Šumadiji, istočnoj Srbiji — postojali su manji ili veći partizanski odredi, ali njihovi pokušaji da rasplamsaju NOB spriječili su višestruko nadmoć­ nije okupatorsko-kvislinške snage i njihov teror. Na Kosovu i u Metohiji do pred kraj juna bio je potpuno onemogućen opstanak partizanskih odreda zbog još uvijek snažnog njemačkog uticaja na najveći dio albanskog življa, koji je uz to bio i dobro naoružan. Stoga su se kosovsko-metohijski partizanski odredi i bataljoni (sem četiri malene ilegalne partizanske grupe) borili na drugim terenima. Tek krajem juna je novoformirani Kosovski partizanski bataljon počeo na svome terenu da izvodi svoje prve borbene akcije. U Vojvodini su, pak, partizanski odredi, naročito u Sremu gdje je postojala i jedna udarna brigada, uspješno izvodili diverzije na komunikacijama i napadali na manje neprijateljeve posade. Glavni štab NOV i PO Vojvodine, koji se odranije s obje vojvođanske XI divizije nalazio u istočnoj Bosni, u junu se avionom prebacio u Bari i pripremao se poslije referisanja Vrhovnom štabu na Visu za odlazak u Vojvodinu. U Makedoniji su NOB-om bile zahvaćene značajne oblasti i u istočnom i u zapadnom njenom dijelu. Prekinuti su ili ugroženi komunikacijski pravci između okupatorovih garnizona, a postala je
Recommended publications
  • I N D I C a T E U R K U R S B U C H Važi Od 9.12.2018. Do 14.12.2019
    Akcionarsko društvo za železnički prevoz putnika „Srbija Voz“, Beograd I N D I C A T E U R K U R S B U C H Važi od 9.12.2018. do 14.12.2019. godine B E O G R A D 2019. “Srbija Voz” a.d. zadržava pravo na izmenu podataka. Informacije o izmenama dostupne su na informativnim punktovima “Srbija Voz” a.d. Grafička obrada: Boban Suljić Dizajn korica: Borko Milojević Tiraž 1.530 primeraka SADRŽAJ A. INFORMATIVNI DEO .................................. 4 (štampan plavom bojom) B. RED VOŽNJE VOZOVA U MEĐUNARODNOM SAOBRAĆAJU .. 29 (štampan zelenom bojom) PREGLED SASTAVA I PERIODI SAOBRAĆAJA VOZOVA I DIREKTNIH KOLA U MEĐUNARODNOM PUTNIČKOM SAOBRAĆAJU .................................................................................... 30 C. RED VOŽNJE VOZOVA U UNUTRAŠNJEM PUTNIČKOM SAOBRAĆAJU ..................................................................................... 49 (štampan plavom bojom) Beograd Centar - Šid ....................................................................... 50 Ruma - Šabac - Loznica - Zvornik ................................................... 52 Novi Sad - Bogojevo - Sombor - Subotica ....................................... 53 Novi Sad - Vrbas - Sombor ............................................................. 55 Beograd (Beograd Centar) - Novi Sad - Subotica ........................... 56 Novi Sad - Orlovat stajalište – Zrenjanin .......................................... 62 Subotica - Senta - Kikinda ............................................................... 63 (Beograd Centar) - Pančevo Glavna - Zrenjanin
    [Show full text]
  • Pravilnik O Utvrđivanju Vodnih Tela Površinskih I Podzemnih Voda
    Na osnovu člana 7. stav 4. Zakona o vodama ("Službeni glasnik RS", broj 30/10), Ministar poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede, donosi Pravilnik o utvrđivanju vodnih tela površinskih i podzemnih voda Pravilnik je objavljen u "Službenom glasniku RS", br. 96/2010 od 18.12.2010. godine. Član 1. Ovim pravilnikom utvrđuju se vodna tela površinskih i podzemnih voda. Član 2. Naziv vodnog tela površinskih voda iz člana 1. ovog pravilnika, naziv vodotoka na kome se nalazi vodno telo, kategorija (reka, veštačko vodno telo, značajno izmenjeno vodno telo), dužina i šifra vodnog tela, kao i vodno područje na kome se nalazi vodno telo dati su u Prilogu 1. koji je odštampan uz ovaj pravilnik i čini njegov sastavni deo. Naziv vodnog tela površinskih voda - jezera iz člana 1. ovog pravilnika, površina vodenog ogledala i vodno područje na kome se nalazi vodno telo dati su u Prilogu 2. koji je odštampan uz ovaj pravilnik i čini njegov sastavni deo. Naziv vodnog tela podzemnih voda iz člana 1. ovog pravilnika, površina i šifra vodnog tela, hidrogeološka jedinica iz Vodoprivredne osnove Republike Srbije, kao i vodno područje na kome se nalazi vodno telo dati su u Prilogu 3. koji je odštampan uz ovaj pravilnik i čini njegov sastavni deo. Član 3. Ovaj pravilnik stupa na snagu osmog dana od dana objavljivanja u "Službenom glasniku Republike Srbije". Broj 110-00-299/2010-07 U Beogradu, 10. decembra 2010. godine Ministar, dr Saša Dragin, s.r. Prilog 1. VODNA TELA POVRŠINSKIH VODA - VODOTOCI Dužina Redni Kategorija vodnog Šifra vodnog Vodno Naziv vodnog tela
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of Cooperation in the Balkans Between Soe and Nkvd in January-August 1944
    International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION Vol. XXVII No 1 2021 ASPECTS OF COOPERATION IN THE BALKANS BETWEEN SOE AND NKVD IN JANUARY-AUGUST 1944 Marian ZIDARU Black Sea House Association, Constanța, Romania [email protected] Abstract: A meeting was held on 14th January 1944 to discuss the possibilities which might exist for increased collaboration between S.O.E. and N.K.V.D. in the Balkans. The following agenda was submitted: A review of S.O.E. aims in each area and an outline of their resources with the object of examining the possibilities of a concerted Balkans plan for all countries concerned. The coordination of all these plans into one directive. The possibility of discussing such a plan with the N.K.V.D. in an endeavor to enlist their cooperation and assistance in a common plan for S.O.E., O.S.S. and N.K.V.D. Our article follows the evolution of these plans during January-August 1944. Keywords: SOE, NKVD, Balkan, O.S.S., Force 133 1. Introduction As regards Bulgaria: This was the one Cooperation in Eastern Europe countries country in regard to which there was some was difficult. No detailed study of SOE point in initiating discussions in Moscow operation here can be attempted. The for collaboration [1]. NKVD considered British plans regarding Hungary Poland, Czechoslovakia, 2. Yugoslavia Romania, and Bulgaria with deep concern. In Yugoslavia, there were two rival An SOE analyses report in 1944 concluded guerrilla groups within the resistance As regards Yugoslavia: The sending of a movement: a right-wing group called very strong Russian Mission to Tito will Chetniks led by Colonel Draza Mihajlovic bring to a head the questions of future co- and a group of communist partisans led by operation between the Russians and British Josip Broz Tito.
    [Show full text]
  • Kursbuch Serbien, Montenegro Und Kosovo
    Kursbuch der Eisenbahnen in Serbien, Montenegro und im Kosovo Fahrplanjahr 2017 (Gültig 11.12.2016 ‐ 09.12.2017) Alle Angaben ohne Gewähr! Bei der Fülle der verarbeiteten Daten können unbeabsichtigt Fehler entstanden sein. Gegebenenfalls Datenstand vorher im Netz auf Aktualität prüfen bzw. vor Ort erfragen. © djb ‐ 2 ‐ Kursbuch Serbien/Montenegro/Kosovo V1 Versionsübersicht und Historie Kursbuch 2017 Version Datum Änderungen und Anpassungen Releaseversion Betroffene Kursbuchstrecken bzw. Seiten 17‐V0.01 03.12.2016 Erste Fahrplandaten eingepflegt V4 11 20 21.1 17‐V0.02 06.12.2016 Daten eingepflegt V4 P1 P3 P8 21.9 30.3 33 34 80 85 90 K1 K2 99 17‐V0.03 08.12.2016 Daten eingepflegt 46 53 17‐V0.04 09.12.2016 Daten eingepflegt V1 V2 30.1 17‐V0.90 11.12.2016 Vorabversion (KBS 10‐40, 53‐54, 73, 80‐99 und K1‐K2) P1 73 17‐V0.91 13.12.2016 Daten eingepflegt 50 60 K3 71 Fahrradsymbol ergänzt 10 12 20 21 21.9 25 73 80 85 90 Fehler korrigiert 20 71 73 90 17‐V0.92 16.12.2016 Daten eingepflegt V4 P2 M1.1 M1.2 M2 52 75 17‐V1.00 17.12.2016 Daten eingepflegt V2 V4 P1 P9 70 Fehler korrigiert P8 54 K1 99 17‐V1.01 02.01.2017 Fehler korrigiert 54 99 17‐V1.02 18.07.2017 Fehler korrigiert 10 30 Fahrradsymbol ergänzt 30 33 40 44 Züge und Halte ergänzt, Zeiten angepasst 10 30 40 44 45 17‐V1.03 11.10.2017 Grenzverkehre angepasst, inkl.
    [Show full text]
  • Missing … Believed Killed!
    Missing … Believed Killed! The Story of Flight Sergeant Leonard James Smith, Air Gunner, R.A.F.V.R. By Terry Maker Missing - Believed Killed Terry Maker is a retired computer engineer, who has taken to amateur genealogy, after retirement due to ill health in 2003. He is the husband of Patricia Maker, nee Gash, and brother in law of Teddy Gash, (the cousins of Fl/Sgt L.J. Smith). He served as a Civilian Instructor in the Air Training Corps, at Stanford le Hope from 1988 until 1993.The couple live in Essex, and have done so for 36 years; they have no children, and have two golden retrievers. Disclaimer The contents of this document are subject to constant, and unannounced, revision. All of the foregoing is ‘as found’, and assumed to be correct at the time of compilation, and writing. However, this research is ongoing, and the content may be subject to change in the light of new disclosure and discovery, as new information comes to light. We ask for your indulgence, and understanding, in this difficult, and delicate area of research. There is copyright, on, and limited to, new material generated by the author, all content not by the author is, ‘as found’, in the Public Domain. © Terry Maker, 2009 Essex. Front Cover Watermark: “JP292-W undergoing routine maintenance at Brindisi, 1944” (Please note: This photograph is of unknown provenance, and is very similar to the “B-Beer, Brindisi, 1943” photo shown elsewhere in this booklet. It may be digitally altered, and could be suspect!) 2 A story of World War II Missing… Believed Killed By Terry Maker 3 To the men, living and dead, who did these things?” Paul Brickhill 4 Dedicated to the Memory of (Enhanced photograph) Flight Sergeant Leonard James Smith, Air Gunner, R.A.F.V.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912
    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Plan of Action (Epoa) Serbia: Floods
    P a g e | 1 Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Serbia: Floods DREF Operation n° MDRRS014 Glide n°: FF2020-00158-SRB Expected timeframe: 4 months Date of issue: 10 July 2020 Expected end date: 30 November 2020 Category allocated to the of the disaster or crisis: Yellow DREF allocated: CHF 313,953 Total number of people affected: 52,745 Number of people to be 20,256 assisted: Provinces affected: 24 Provinces targeted: 20 Host National Societypresence (n° of volunteers, staff, branches): Red Cross of Serbia (RCS) with 222 volunteers and 83 staff in the branches of Arilje, Blace, Cacak, Despotovac, Doljevac, Gornji Milanovac, Ivanjica, Koceljeva, Kosjeric, Krusevac, Kursumlija, Lucani, Majdanpek, Osecina, Pozega, Prokuplje, Zitoradja, Kraljevo, Ljubovija, Trstenik, Krupanj, Obrenovac, Bajina Basta, Vladimirci. Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: N/A Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: Sector for emergency of the Ministry of Interior, members of the Municipal Emergency Response headquarters (municipal emergency services), Serbian Armed Forces, local public companies. A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster For two weeks before the date of the disaster, which occurred on 22-24 June, the Republic of Serbia was affected by heavy rainfalls. The most affected areas are Kolubarski, Moravicki, Raski, Zlatiborski, Rasinski, Toplicki, Jablanicki, and Pomoravski districts. 8 municipalities and cities reported on 22 June that were affected by heavy rain that caused flash floods and floods. It was reported that the municipalities of Osecina, Ljubovija, and Lucani are the most affected by heavy rain (more than 40 litres per square meter in 24 hours) leading to floods in the whole region.
    [Show full text]
  • Air University Review: March-April 1977, Volume XXVIII, No. 3
    The Professional Journal of the United States A ir Force the editors aerie Dr. Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr., in our lead article, "Emerging Major Power Relationships," reflects on the shifting great power triangle of the United States, the Soviet Union, and the Peop!e's Republic of China. The cover, by Art Editor/lllustrator Bill DePaola, depicts an American eagle warily observing this triangle in a graphic elaboration of an abstract theme. For the first time in the experience of this editor, the Awards Committee members were unanimous in their first place votes for Major Don Alberts's "A Call from the Wilderness'' in the November-December 1976 issue. Aspiring authors who want to gain insight into subject matter that receives a very receptive reading by our editorial panei may want to re-examine that article. To the 50 percent of Air Force officers who necessarily receive an efficiency rating of three or below, it may be of more than passing interest to learn that the pseudonymous author of "I Am a Three" was recently promoted. You won't find Major Mark Wynn's name on the lieutenant colonel's promotion list, but we have it on good authority that the author who appeared under that nom de plume in the September-October 1976 issue is a living example that "threes" are promotable. Congratulations would seem to be appropriate, but how does one congratulate the anonymous? In this issue we find ourselves in the slightly embarrassed position of publishing an article by a member of the Air University Review Awards Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Air Force Historical Society Journal 46
    ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY JOURNAL 46 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. First published in the UK in 2009 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISSN 1361 4231 Printed by Windrush Group Windrush House Avenue Two Station Lane Witney OX28 4XW 3 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air Marshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-Marshal N B Baldwin CB CBE FRAeS Vice-Chairman Group Captain J D Heron OBE Secretary Group Captain K J Dearman FRAeS Membership Secretary Dr Jack Dunham PhD CPsychol AMRAeS Treasurer J Boyes TD CA Members Air Commodore G R Pitchfork MBE BA FRAes *J S Cox Esq BA MA *Dr M A Fopp MA FMA FIMgt *Group Captain A J Byford MA MA RAF *Wing Commander P K Kendall BSc ARCS MA RAF Wing Commander C Cummings Editor & Publications Wing Commander C G Jefford MBE BA Manager *Ex Officio 4 CONTENTS OPENING ADDRESS – Air Chf Mshl Sir David Cousins 7 THE NORTHERN MEDITERRANEAN 1943-1945 by Wg 9 Cdr Andrew Brookes AIRBORNE FORCES IN THE NORTH MEDITERRANEAN 20 THEATRE OF OPERATIONS by Wg Cdr Colin Cummings DID ALLIED AIR INTERDICTION
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Sector Development Strategy of the Republic of Serbia for the Period by 2025 with Projections by 2030
    REPUBLIC OF SERBIA MINISTRY OF MINING AND ENERGY ENERGY SECTOR DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA FOR THE PERIOD BY 2025 WITH PROJECTIONS BY 2030 Belgrade 2016 Energy Sector Development Strategy of the Republic of Serbia for the period by 2025 with projections by 2030 Republic of Serbia Ministry of Mining and Energy Belgrade, 2016 Publisher: Republic of Serbia Ministry of Mining and Energy Department for strategic planning in energy sector Print: Kosmos Ltd Belgrade Print run: 500 copies TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ENERGY SECTOR DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA FOR THE PERIOD BY 2025 WITH PROJECTIONS BY 2030 ........................................................................................5 1. Introduction ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������7 1.1. Energy Sector and Economic Development ...............................................................................................................7 1.2. Sustainability as an Energy Sector Development Challenge ...............................................................................8 2. ENERGY RESOURCES AND POTENTIALS OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA .............................................................9 2.1. Coal ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 11 2.2. Oil and natural gas
    [Show full text]
  • The Allied Presence on Vis 1943-45 15 Jul 43 a C-47A
    The Allied Presence on Vis 1943-45 15 Jul 43 A C-47A (ser. # 42-23515; Mission 9377) went MIA at Vis Island (apparently all crewmen were accounted for).1 Mid Aug 43 Some 3 weeks before Italy capitulated, the Partisans captured the entire Italian military garrison, of approx. 50 troops, on Vis without a fight, nor any casualties (variously described as an old fort and a lookout post atop Mt Hum). The Italians were disarmed and then freed, whereupon 10 hostages were taken from both Komiža and Vis, with the Italian demand that their weapons be returned within three days.2 31 Aug 43 With no weapons having been returned, the 20 hostages from Komiža and Vis were publicly executed by Italian firing squad.3 8 Sep 43 Italy capitulated. 24 Sep 43 Split evacuated by Partisans under Gen Koca Popović, to advancing Germans, having only controlled the city for eleven days.4 12 Oct 43 OSS began a 3-month mission, under Major Louis Huot, USA, to provide 6,000 tons of supplies to the Partisan garrison on Vis, via Bari, aboard the HMS Gull (Sub-Lt Taylor, RNR) and the little coal steamer SS Bakar. Huot wrote of his main interlocutors being the garrison commander, Commander Sergije Makiedo (actually the Commissar, Lt Col [later Admiral] Josip Černi/Černy was the Cdr), and Jože Poduje. They would moor in the "Baie des Anglais," a little basin on the eastern side of Vis harbor. A derelict convent on the waterfront then served as the Partisan hospital, with 3 young indefatigable doctors, “Bobin,” who spoke shaky French, “Zucalo” who spoke appalling English, & “Biacic” who spoke basic German [note how Strutton cites only 2 Partisan doctors on Vis, the charlatan, “Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Prostorni Plan Srbije
    U V O D Prostorni plan Republike Srbije kao strateški razvojni oblastima/sektorima; (ii) planski iskazi o buducem razvoju dokument za period do 2010. godine utvrduje: (projekcije, prognoze, planske strategije, planske koncepcije ?? dugorocne osnove organizacije, korišcenja i uredenja itd.); i prostora Republike Srbije; (iii) skup mera o implementaciji. ?? pravce urbanizacije i osnovne kriterijume uredenja U Prostornom planu postignut je stepen sinteze naselja; planskih rešenja moguc u datim okolnostima. Bice neophodno ?? planska nacela i kriterijume korišcenja prirodnih resursa i da se dugorocne koncepcije Plana razrade za srednjerocni zaštite životne sredine; period i usaglase instrumenti primene Prostornog plana sa politikama i merama koje ce biti korišcene u drugim ?? uslove za zaštitu i korišcenje podrucja od posebnog oblastima razvoja. Problem uskladivanja raznih interesa (cesto znacaja; i oprecnih i konfliktnih) u korišcenju prostora, u institucijama ?? koridore osnovnih infrastrukturnih sistema. politickog sistema, zahtevace potpuniju strucnu i naucnu Prostornim planom se prvenstveno usmerava i podršku, kako informaticku i istraživacku, tako i kontroliše organizacija i uredenje prostora Republike ali su u institucionalno-organizacionu i programsku. U tom smislu, njemu sadržane i propozicije iz drugih oblasti razvoja prioritetno ce se pristupiti izradi i donošenju posebnog (ekonomskog, socijalnog i dr.). Utoliko je Plan do odredenog Programa za ostvarivanje Prostornog plana Republike Srbije. stepena integrativan. Razlog je u neodvojivosti
    [Show full text]