DOCSLIB.ORG

Of the Rockies PV Modules Made In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Of the Rockies PV Modules Made In PHOTOVOLTAICS GE THIN-FILM FAB PV modules made in the shadowof the Rockies This building in Aurora, Last May, Mark Little, General Electric’s Global Research Director, said that Colorado, will soon house GE’s new 400 MW thin- in five years he sees solar power as being cheaper than fossil fuels. The US- film PV manufacturing based international company with huge energy and infrastructure divisions facility. Photo: Chris Meehan starts a new engagement in PV panel production with the building of a 400 MW CdTe module manufacturing plant in Colorado. After completion later this year, the facility will be the biggest thin-film PV fab in the country. he empty warehouse just off Interstate 70 in manufacturing facility in Indiana, which is slated to Aurora, CO, doesn’t look like much at present. begin construction this year. TIn fact, peering through its tinted windows PV manufacturing facilities have dotted the US, under an azure winter sky, one notices dirt floors and with states including Arizona, California, Ohio and nearby construction trailers. They are the only hints Oregon all housing PV manufacturing facilities that that a very different future is in store for this vacant produce more than 100 MW annually. But this is the building, this empty parking lot. It will soon see deliv­ first such facility for Colorado. “I think that it’s one ery of the first pieces of the manufacturing equipment thing to be able to have a start­up business ramp up that will make it home to the largest thin­film PV man­ operations in Colorado, but to have one of the world’s ufacturing plant in the US, when it’s completed – in largest businesses reinforce that it wants to get into about a year. photovoltaics and choose Colorado as its base is a General Electric (GE) chose the community – big vote of confidence in the state,” says Colorado which is part of the Denver­Aurora­Boulder metro­ Solar Energy Industries Association (COSEIA) politan area with a population of about 3 million – Executive Director Neal Lurie. “It sends a clear mes­ to house its first commercial thin­film PV manufac­ sage that Colorado is an attractive place for solar turing facility, and it’s no small bet on the technolo­ businesses to invest and that our high­calibre work­ gy. Including its purchase of PrimeStar Solar and the force is a real competitive advantage.” new facility, GE is investing about US$ 600 million GE chose the location after a nationwide search. in thin­film cadmium telluride (CdTe) PV. When com­ It also considered Arizona, New York and some other pleted and operational, the new facility will employ locations. “The team in Arizona was incredibly effec­ about 355 people and produce 400 MW of PV mod­ tive in working with us, trying to help us drive our de­ ules annually. That’s larger than either of First cision,” says Matt Guyette, Marketing and Strategy Solar’s manufacturing facilities in the US. It will also Leader of GE Wind and Solar. “But there are a lot of likely start producing modules on a commercial different factors that really made Colorado the prime scale faster than Abound Solar’s planned 640 MW location for our first plant. Mainly what we looked at 118 Sun & Wind Energy 3/2012 was speed to market,” Guyette asserts. The modules Guyette asserts. While he will not specify how much that will be made at the plant were developed in near­ the GE modules will cost on a per watt basis, he con­ by Arvada at PrimeStar Solar. GE first invested in the tends, “Our goal is you need to be competitive on a company as a centre of excellence in 2007 and pur­ levelised cost of electricity basis with all the technol­ chased it outright in 2011. ogies out there.” “Leveraging the skill set of our resources there Maybe the company has good reason to be so really allowed us to get our plant up and running positive because it plans to enter the thin­film market faster . We have a key leadership team there and a with modules at about the same efficiency level as technology team. And having Aurora, which is only those produced in First Solar plants. That competitor about 30 minutes away, is really going to help us le­ has just reached a milestone of 14.4 % conversion ef­ verage that skill set and focus on the speed of getting ficiency across a whole thin­film module. GE isn’t far this plant up and running,” Guyette explains. Other behind and expects to start production at the new fa­ Matt Guyette, Marketing and factors that influenced GE included the area, the work­ cility with modules that are at least 14 % efficient. Strategy Leader of GE Wind and force, Colorado’s universities and having the National The company already has bigger plans for the Solar Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) close by. technology. It sees the plant as the first phase of a Photo: GE multi­GW build out. The first plant is being designed Subsidies coming only from Aurora so that the process could be repeated elsewhere in the US and internationally. Guyette: “The goal would The facility is not being subsidised by the federal be to leverage that technology to be able to build any­ government, but will receive subsidies of up to about where in the world that made sense.” 3 % of its US$ 300 million investment – mainly from GE actually is following a double strategy with re­ Aurora, for construction costs. “The decision made gard to thin­film, aimed at becoming a brand name in was based on the economics of the technology and both the CIGS and the CdTe sector. Since 2010, the com­ the cost position. So there was no federal subsidy pany has installed thousands of CIGS modules manu­ driving this,” Guyette says. GE’s research teams in factured by Showa Shell Sekiyu’s business unit Solar Colorado, Munich, Shanghai, Bangalore and New Frontier in Japan. At the same time, GE was increasing York made the technology economically feasible. its interest in the NREL/PrimeStar Solar technology. “The accumulative research is now ready for its com­ mercial debut.” Colorado as renewable energy hub GE is confident that the modules to be produced at the new facility will be cost­competitive with other GE’s new facility builds on a history of renewable PV technologies. In fact, the company abandoned its energy research in Colorado stretching back to the silicon­based technology over a year ago in favour of birth of NREL in the late 1970’s. More recently it has thin­film PV. Despite continued price drops in silicon attracted a number of different businesses involved PV, the company continues to believe in the technol­ in modern renewable energy, with Vestas housing a ogy. “We made the decisions expecting the current manufacturing facility in Pueblo and SMA America lo­ very competitive environment,” Guyette says. “We cating a PV inverter manufacturing facility in Denver. wouldn’t have built this factory without having a tech­ “The previous administration really focused on ener­ nology path, a cost path that we thought could com­ gy economy. We’re building on that and looking at the pete in the marketplace with all technologies,” entire energy sector,” says Governor’s Energy Office SUNLIGHT + PERFECTENERGY = YOU SMILE! The ArT of AbsoluTe PerfecTion Your reliable business partner for high-quality solar modules. www.perfectenergy-gmbh.de Perfectenergy Gmbh | Tannenweg 8-10 | D-53757 sankt Augustin PHOTOVOLTAICS GE THIN-FILM FAB “Double strategy” in thin film technology: this 1 MW PV power plant in Aschenheim, Germany, is equipped with GE CIGS modules, manufactured by partner Solar Frontier in Japan. Photo: Gehrlicher Solar Director Tanuj “TJ” Deora. GE’s PrimeStar expansion Mexico via a Texas port in Houston and to Canada and the thin­film manufacturing joins a cluster that through a network of Interstate highways and rail­ was already populated by companies like Abound ways, Deora says. But GE may not have to ship so far Solar and Ascent Solar. from home. After all, Colorado has one of the US’s Abound Solar began producing CdTe modules in highest renewable energy standard requirements Longmont, 80 km north of Denver in 2009. The com­ and could benefit from more locally produced solar pany plans to expand its capacity there from the cur­ projects. rent 65 MW/a to 200 MW/a by the end of the year. GE is already testing the technology in its new About Abound Solar, Guyette says, “They’ve had backyard, and elsewhere. In addition to Colorado, it’s some good progress and I look to them to be both a also testing in Phoenix, Arizona, the Middle East, friendly competitor, and at the same time, they help Germany, and in upstate New York, according to drive some of the industry things that all solar manu­ Guyette. “We have a number of locations where we’re facturers are going to push.” leveraging the production off the pilot line to test dif­ ferent environmental conditions around the world.” Plant to be copied “wherever it Once the facility starts producing in volume, GE will makes sense” quickly ramp up the size of projects to be equipped with the modules. Small facilities will start at 1 to COSEIA’s representative Lurie hopes that GE’s deci­ 2 MW. “Then we’re looking at very large­scale oppor­ sion will attract more solar companies to Colorado. tunities, signi ficantly larger than that,” Guyette says. “There’s no question that we have a solar manufac­ The company is close to naming some of those sites, turing cluster here,” he asserts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beyond Solyndra: Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program Hilary Kao
    William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review Volume 37 | Issue 2 Article 4 Beyond Solyndra: Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program Hilary Kao Repository Citation Hilary Kao, Beyond Solyndra: Examining the Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program, 37 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 425 (2013), http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr/vol37/iss2/4 Copyright c 2013 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr BEYOND SOLYNDRA: EXAMINING THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY’S LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM HILARY KAO* ABSTRACT In the year following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in March 2011, the renewable and clean energy industries faced significant turmoil— from natural disasters, to political maelstroms, from the Great Recession, to U.S. debt ceiling debates. The Department of Energy’s Loan Guarantee Program (“DOE LGP”), often a target since before it ever received a dollar of appropriations, has been both blamed and defended in the wake of the bankruptcy filing of Solyndra, a California-based solar panel manufac- turer, in September 2011, because of the $535 million loan guarantee made to it by the Department of Energy (“DOE”) in 2009.1 Critics have suggested political favoritism in loan guarantee awards and have questioned the government’s proper role in supporting renewable energy companies and the renewable energy industry generally.2 This Article looks beyond the Solyndra controversy to examine the origin, structure and purpose of the DOE LGP. It asserts that loan guaran- tees can serve as viable policy tools, but require careful crafting to have the potential to be effective programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Cadmium Telluride Photovoltaics - Wikipedia 1 of 13
    Cadmium telluride photovoltaics - Wikipedia 1 of 13 Cadmium telluride photovoltaics Cadmium telluride (CdTe) photovoltaics describes a photovoltaic (PV) technology that is based on the use of cadmium telluride, a thin semiconductor layer designed to absorb and convert sunlight into electricity.[1] Cadmium telluride PV is the only thin film technology with lower costs than conventional solar cells made of crystalline silicon in multi-kilowatt systems.[1][2][3] On a lifecycle basis, CdTe PV has the smallest carbon footprint, lowest water use and shortest energy payback time of any current photo voltaic technology. PV array made of cadmium telluride (CdTe) solar [4][5][6] CdTe's energy payback time of less than a year panels allows for faster carbon reductions without short- term energy deficits. The toxicity of cadmium is an environmental concern mitigated by the recycling of CdTe modules at the end of their life time,[7] though there are still uncertainties[8][9] and the public opinion is skeptical towards this technology.[10][11] The usage of rare materials may also become a limiting factor to the industrial scalability of CdTe technology in the mid-term future. The abundance of tellurium—of which telluride is the anionic form— is comparable to that of platinum in the earth's crust and contributes significantly to the module's cost.[12] CdTe photovoltaics are used in some of the world's largest photovoltaic power stations, such as the Topaz Solar Farm. With a share of 5.1% of worldwide PV production, CdTe technology accounted for more than half of the thin film market in 2013.[13] A prominent manufacturer of CdTe thin film technology is the company First Solar, based in Tempe, Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • AS You Sow on Creating Greener Solar PV Panels
    AS You Sow on Creating Greener Solar PV Panels Andrew Burger. March 28, 2012 Advocating solar PV manufacturers adopt a set of industry best practices, a new survey and report highlights the environmental benefits of using solar photovoltaic (PV) energy as compared to fossil fuels, while at the same time criticizing ongoing, outsized government support for fossil fuel production. “Even though there are toxic compounds used in the manufacturing of many solar panels, the generation of electricity from solar energy is much safer to both the environment and workers than production of electricity from coal, natural gas, or nuclear,” stated Amy Galland, PhD and research director at non-profit group As You Sow. “For example, once a solar panel is installed, it generates electricity with no emissions of any kind for decades, whereas coal-fired power plants in the U.S. emitted nearly two billion tons of carbon dioxide and millions of tons of toxic compounds in 2010 alone.” Based on an international survey of more than 100 solar PV manufac- turers, the best practices in As You Sow’s report, “Clean & Green: Best Practices in Photovoltaics” aim to protect the employee and community health and safety, as well as the broader environment. Also analyzed are investor considerations regarding environmental, social and govern- ance for responsible management of solar PV manufacturing business- es. The best practices listed were determined in consultation with sci- entists, engineers, academics, government labs and industry consult- ants. Solar PV CSR survey and report card “We have been working with solar companies to study and minimize the environmental health and safety risks in the production of solar panels and the industry has embraced the opportunities,” Vasilis Fthenakis, PhD and director of the National PV Environmen- tal Health and Safety Research Center at Brookhaven National Laboratory and director of the Center for Life Cycle Analysis at Columbia University, explained.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Lake Feasibility Study
    A Comprehensive Solar Energy Power System for the Turkey Lake Service Plaza Contract #: BDK75-977-18 7 January 2010 Project Research Team Charles J. Kibert, Ph.D., P.E., Principal Investigator S.A. Sherif, Ph.D. Robert Ries, Ph.D. Edward Minchin, Ph.D., P.E. Russell Walters, Ph.D., P.E. Lauren Hertel Consultant Al Simpler, President, Simpler Solar, Inc. Research Assistants Kevin Priest Jason Sanders Sean Snowden Srikanth Madala Milind Gholap 01/07/2010 iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Florida Turnpike Enterprise (FTE) has the bold vision of maximizing the use of renewable energy in their operations and potentially supplying all the energy needs of their facilities via solar technologies. To determine the technical and financial feasibility of executing this vision, the FTE selected the Turkey Lake Service Plaza on the Florida Turnpike for a case study to explore this potential shift to renewable energy sources. A University of Florida research team collaborated with FTE and Florida Department of Transportation staff to examine contemporary solar technologies, particularly solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, for their potential to meet the energy needs of the Turkey Lake Service Plaza. The scope of the research included: 1. Evaluation of Solar Electric (PV), Solar Thermal (hot water), and Solar Lighting systems. 2. Assessment of the renewable energy generation potential of the Service Plaza. 3. Designing and planning of photovoltaic systems to determine the energy output. 4. Identification of innovative financing options. 5. Development of a marketing and education concept for the project. The research team concluded that by implementing the Net Zero Energy scenario, the annual electrical energy needs of all the facilities at the Turkey Lake Service Plaza could be met.
    [Show full text]
  • Laying the Foundation for a Bright Future: Assessing Progress
    Laying the Foundation for a Bright Future Assessing Progress Under Phase 1 of India’s National Solar Mission Interim Report: April 2012 Prepared by Council on Energy, Environment and Water Natural Resources Defense Council Supported in part by: ABOUT THIS REPORT About Council on Energy, Environment and Water The Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) is an independent nonprofit policy research institution that works to promote dialogue and common understanding on energy, environment, and water issues in India and elsewhere through high-quality research, partnerships with public and private institutions and engagement with and outreach to the wider public. (http://ceew.in). About Natural Resources Defense Council The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is an international nonprofit environmental organization with more than 1.3 million members and online activists. Since 1970, our lawyers, scientists, and other environmental specialists have worked to protect the world’s natural resources, public health, and the environment. NRDC has offices in New York City; Washington, D.C.; Los Angeles; San Francisco; Chicago; Livingston and Beijing. (www.nrdc.org). Authors and Investigators CEEW team: Arunabha Ghosh, Rajeev Palakshappa, Sanyukta Raje, Ankita Lamboria NRDC team: Anjali Jaiswal, Vignesh Gowrishankar, Meredith Connolly, Bhaskar Deol, Sameer Kwatra, Amrita Batra, Neha Mathew Neither CEEW nor NRDC has commercial interests in India’s National Solar Mission, nor has either organization received any funding from any commercial or governmental institution for this project. Acknowledgments The authors of this report thank government officials from India’s Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE), NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam (NVVN), and other Government of India agencies, as well as United States government officials.
    [Show full text]
  • Lsoar Value Chain Value Chain
    Solar Private companies in black Public companies in blue Followed by the founding date of companies less than 15 years old value chain (1 of 2) This value chain publication contains information gathered and summarized mainly from Lux Research and a variety of other public sources that we believe to be accurate at the time of ppggyublication. The information is for general guidance only and not intended to be a substitute for detailed research or the exercise of professional judgment. Neither EYGM Limited nor any other member of the global Ernst & Young organization nor Lux Research can accept responsibility for loss to any person relying on this publication. Materials and equipment Components and products Balance of system and installations Crystalline silicon photovoltaic GCL Silicon, China (2006); LDK Solar, China (2005); MEMC, US; Renewable Energy Corporation ASA, Norway; SolarWorld AG, Germany (1998) Bosch Solar Energy, Germany (2000); Canadian Solar, Canada/China (2001); Jinko Solar, China (2006); Kyocera, Japan; Sanyo, Japan; SCHOTT Solar, Germany (2002); Solarfun, China (2004); Tianwei New Energy Holdings Co., China; Trina Solar, China (1997); Yingli Green Energy, China (1998); BP Solar, US; Conergy, Germany (1998); Eging Photovoltaic, China SOLON, Germany (1997) Daqo Group, China; M. Setek, Japan; ReneSola, China (2003); Wacker, Germany Hyundai Heavy Industries,,; Korea; Isofoton,,p Spain ; JA Solar, China (();2005); LG Solar Power,,; Korea; Mitsubishi Electric, Japan; Moser Baer Photo Voltaic, India (2005); Motech, Taiwan; Samsung
    [Show full text]
  • Sentimental Journey the Long, Winding Road to a Renewable Energy Future
    EYE ON THE MARKET • ENERGY OUTLOOK 2016 Sentimental Journey The long, winding road to a renewable energy future J.P. MORGAN PRIVATE BANK On a sentimental journey, some of the images you recall seeing were real, some were based in reality but weren’t exactly what you thought they were, and others existed only in the realm of your imagination. This year’s topics include a status report on renewable energy penetration compared to some prior forecasts, a look at New York’s ambitious conservation and renewable energy plan, the latest on electric cars, the potential for more hydropower in the US, the commodity super-cycle and oil prices in 2017, and how utilities in sunny US states are changing their customer billing as distributed solar power grows. EYE ON THE MARKET • MICHAEL CEMBALEST • J.P. MORGAN Sentimental Journey: the long, winding road to a renewable energy future June 2016 The journey to a renewable energy future is taking longer than many analysts and agencies expected. How so? The solid line in the first chart shows the percentage of US primary energy1 derived from renewable sources, alongside some over-optimistic prior forecasts2. Similarly, most forecasts for nd electric vehicles (EVs and plug-in hybrid vehicles) have been too high as well, as shown in the 2 chart. The share of US primary energy coming from renewable Another generation of electric car projections out of sources, and some notable forecasts sync with reality, EV+PHEV sales as % of total car sales 50% Physicist Bent Sorensen 12% Deutsche Bank Google 2030 Clean ● US 40% Energy Plan 10% PwC ● Global Frost & Sullivan Bloomberg NEF Amory Lovins (RMI) 8% 30% IEA Carter Admin Roland Berger (solar only) Nat'l 6% 20% Renew.
    [Show full text]
  • Bankrupt Companies
    The List of Fallen Solar Companies: 2015 to 2009: S.No Year/Status Company Name and Details 118 2015 Enecsys (microinverters) bankrupt -- Enecsys raised more than $55 million in VC from investors including Wellington Partners, NES Partners, Good Energies and Climate Change Capital Private Equity for its microinverter technology. 117 2015 QBotix (trackers) closed -- QBotix had a two-axis solar tracker system where the motors, instead of being installed two per tracker, were moved around by a rail-mounted robot that adjusted each tracker every 40 minutes. But while QBotix was trying to gain traction, single-axis solar trackers were also evolving and driving down cost. QBotix raised more than $19.5 million from Firelake, NEA, DFJ JAIC, Siemens Ventures, E.ON and Iberdrola. 116 2015 Solar-Fabrik (c-Si) bankrupt -- German module builder 115 2015 Soitec (CPV) closed -- France's Soitec, one of the last companies with a hope of commercializing concentrating photovoltaic technology, abandoned its solar business. Soitec had approximately 75 megawatts' worth of CPV projects in the ground. 114 2015 TSMC (CIGS) closed -- TSMC Solar ceased manufacturing operations, as "TSMC believes that its solar business is no longer economically sustainable." Last year, TSMC Solar posted a champion module efficiency of 15.7 percent with its Stion- licensed technology. 113 2015 Abengoa -- Seeking bankruptcy protection 112 2014 Bankrupt, Areva's solar business (CSP) closed -- Suffering through a closed Fukushima-inspired slowdown in reactor sales, Ausra 111 2014 Bankrupt,
    [Show full text]
  • Mintz Levin Project Finance Greenpaper
    whitepaper Renewable Energy Project Finance in the U.S.: An Overview and Midterm Outlook Renewable Energy Project Finance in the U.S.: An Overview and Midterm Outlook I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Wind, solar and geothermal energy projects in the United States are typically paid for using an approach known as “project finance.” This is a structure employed to finance capital-intensive projects that are either difficult to support on a corporate balance sheet or that become more attractive when financed on their own. Project financing structures will vary on a project-by-project basis, but renewable energy projects in the U.S. utilizing project financing generally rely upon a mix of direct equity investors, tax equity investors and project-level loans provided by a syndicate of banks. Turbulence in the financial markets began disrupting the flow of project financing (both equity and debt) into renewable energy projects in the U.S. in the fourth quarter of 2008. Nearly two years later, the availability of project financing has improved considerably due to the thawing of the lending markets, with a return to longer tenors on term-debt, and legislative support mechanisms introduced as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)—particularly the ITC cash grant. In this report, we provide an update on the current terms and availability of project financing for large-scale wind, solar and geothermal projects in the U.S. and forecast the amount of project financing we expect to be sought by the sector through 2012. In analyzing where this financing is likely to come from, we address the potential impacts of the upcoming expiration of the cash grant and changes to the tax equity supply—two main themes in the renewable energy project financing arena at present.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Technology Reference Guide
    Solar Technology Reference Guide January 2012 Aaron Binkley Prepared for and Funded by the NAIOP Research Foundation Help ensure that the NAIOP Research Foundation continues to promote industry success. Thank you for your choosing to download this report. Foundation research and analysis gives industry professionals unique insights in to the current business environment and emerging trends that lead to successful development and communities. Traditional sources of revenue cover only a portion of the costs of producing these reports. Additional support, provided by end users of this research through the Foundation’s Sustainer Fund, helps to ensure that the Foundation will have the funds to continue to proactively address the many research project requests it receives each year. Donate to the Sustainers Fund today! Gift Levels Benefactor Gifts of $2,500 and above (Contributions to the NAIOP Research Foundation Amount: Leader Gifts of $1,000-$2,499 are tax deductible to the extent allowed by law.) Donor Gifts of $500-$999 Sustainer Gifts of $250-$499 Please see below for contribution information. Learn how to become involved in the work of the Foundation. Yes, I am interested in ways I can Please call me to discuss support the work of the Foundation. Please send me information about Becoming a Foundation Governor Underwriting a Foundation project, or major initiative Area of interest __________________________ Making an annual gift How to apply for a research grant Contact Information NAME COMPANY TITLE ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP PHONE E-MAIL Contribution Information *Make checks payable to NAIOP Research Foundation CARD HOLDER NAME CREDIT CARD TYPE NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE Call Bennett Gray at (703) 674-1436 to make a contribution by telephone.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support
    U.S. Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support Michaela D. Platzer Specialist in Industrial Organization and Business January 27, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42509 U.S. Solar PV Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support Summary Every President since Richard Nixon has sought to increase U.S. energy supply diversity. Job creation and the development of a domestic renewable energy manufacturing base have joined national security and environmental concerns as reasons for promoting the manufacturing of solar power equipment in the United States. The federal government maintains a variety of tax credits and targeted research and development programs to encourage the solar manufacturing sector, and state-level mandates that utilities obtain specified percentages of their electricity from renewable sources have bolstered demand for large solar projects. The most widely used solar technology involves photovoltaic (PV) solar modules, which draw on semiconducting materials to convert sunlight into electricity. By year-end 2013, the total number of grid-connected PV systems nationwide reached more than 445,000. Domestic demand is met both by imports and by about 75 U.S. manufacturing facilities employing upwards of 30,000 U.S. workers in 2014. Production is clustered in a few states including California, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, and Washington. Domestic PV manufacturers operate in a dynamic, volatile, and highly competitive global market now dominated by Chinese and Taiwanese companies. China alone accounted for nearly 70% of total solar module production in 2013. Some PV manufacturers have expanded their operations beyond China to places like Malaysia, the Philippines, and Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding the Photovoltaic Supply Chain in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges
    Expanding the Photovoltaic Supply Chain in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges Brittany L. Smith and Robert Margolis NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-6A20-73363 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC July 2019 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Expanding the Photovoltaic Supply Chain in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges Brittany L. Smith and Robert Margolis Suggested Citation Smith, Brittany L., and Robert Margolis. (2019). Expanding the Photovoltaic Supply Chain in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-6A20-73363. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/73363.pdf. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-6A20-73363 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC July 2019 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NOTICE This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36- 08GO28308. Funding provided by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Solar Energy Technologies Office.
    [Show full text]