PM FCS (BCT) Acronym Book FEBRUARY 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PM FCS (BCT) Acronym Book FEBRUARY 2008 PM FCS (BCT) Acronym Book FEBRUARY 2008 Most FCS centric definition is always given first. Please find other acronyms at www.acronymfinder.com. Submit new or missing FCS program specific acronyms to [email protected]. Produced by Strategic Plans, Programs, Policies and Operations (SP3O) The “G Staff” G1 - HUMAN RESOURCES G2 - SECURITY G3 - OPS (ILSC) G6 - CIO G5/7 - STRATEGIC PLANNINNG AND TRANSFORMATION G8 - RESOURCE MANAGEMENT - 1 - # # 3CE Cross Command Collaborative Environment A A A Analysis (verification type) A&V Agility and Versatility A/C Aircraft A/DACG Arrival/Departure Airfield Control Group A/SPOD Air/Seaport of Debarkation A2C2 Army Airspace Command & Control A2C2S Army Airborne Command and Control System AA Affordability Statement; Attribute Authority; Avenue of Attack AAA Army Audit Agency AADC Army Air Defense Commander AAE Army Acquisition Executive AAEF Army Advanced Experimental Force AAF Army Airfield; Army Availability Factor AAFARS Advanced Aviation Forward Refueling System; Army Aviation Forward Area System AAGS Army Air Ground System AAIC Army Architecture Integration Cell AALPS Automated Air Load Planning System AAN Army After Next AAP Army Apprenticeship Program; Army Acquisition Process; Assessment Anchor Point AAR After Action Review; After Action Report; Association of American Railroads AARMS Army Architecture Repository Management System AASLT Air Assault AATF Air Assault Task Force AATFC Air Assault Task Force Commander AAV Autonomous Armored Vehicle ABC Army Battle Command ABCS Army Battle Command System ABIS Advanced Battlespace Information System ABL Airborne Laser ABPL As Built Parts List ABT Air Breathing Target ABU Assault Battle Unit AC Assessment Criteria; Active Component; Accomplishment Criteria; Associate Contractor AC/RC Active Component / Reserve Component ACA Airspace Control Authority; Airspace Coordination Area, Associate Contractor Agreement ACADA Automatic Chemical Agent Detector Alarm ACAT Acquisition Category - 1 - ACCESS Automated Catalog of Computer Equipment and Software Stores ACCP Army Correspondence Course Program ACE Advanced Collaborative Environment; All-Source Control Element ACEIT Automated Cost Estimating Integrated Tools ACES Army Continuing Education System ACETS Army Corresponding Education and Training System ACL Allowable Cabin Load ACM Airspace Coordination Measure ACMM Aviation Common Modular Missile ACMR Airspace Control Means Measure Request ACO Air Combat Order; Airspace Control Order; Airspace Coordination Order ACP Airspace Control Plan, Army Cost Position ACPERS Army Civilian Personnel System ACR Armored Cavalry Regiment; Advanced Concepts and Requirements ACRB Army Configuration Review Board; Army Council of Review Boards ACS Aerial Common Sensor; Airspace Control System; Altitude Control System, Aerial Common Server; Assistant Chief of Staff ACSA Acquisition and Cross Servicing Agreement ACSIM Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management ACSW Advanced Crew Served Weapon ACT Activity ACTD Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration/Demonstrator ACTEDS Army Civilian Training Education and Development System ACTF Army Constructive Training Federation ACTM Alternating Current Traction Motor ACWP Actual Cost of Work Performed AD Air Defense; Architecture Description; Activity Diagram ADA Air Defense Artillery Artillery Delivered Antipersonnel Mine; Air Defense Artillery ADAM Manager; Air Defense and Airspace Management ADAS Air Delivered Acoustic Sensor ADC Analog to Digital Converter/Conversion ADCATT Aid Defense Combined Arms Tactical Trainer Architecture Definition Document; Authorization ADD Documentation Directorate Advanced Data Environment; Architecture Development ADE Environment Advanced Distributed Learning; Army Digital Library; Army ADL Doctrine Literature ADLER Automated Field Artillery/Fire Support & C3 System (German) ADLT Administrative Logistics Delay Time ADM Acquisition Decision Memorandum; Area Denial Munitions ADNS Automated Digital Network System ADO Army Digitization Office ADOCS Automated Deep Operations Coordination System ADP Architecture Development Plan; Automated Data Processing; Acceptance Data Package - 2 - ADPL As Designed Parts List ADR Architecture Design Review ADRG ARC Digitized Raster Graphics ADS Active Denial System, Air Defense Surveillance ADS-A Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Addressed ADSAM Air Directed Surface to Air Missile ADS-B Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast ADSI Air Defense Systems Integrator ADT Active Duty for Training ADTDL Army Doctrine and Training Digital Library AEA Army Enterprise Architecture AEADP Army Enterprise Architecture Development Plan AEAGD Army Enterprise Architecture Guidance Document AEC Army Evaluation Command AED Aviation Engineering Directorate AEF Army Evaluation Force; Air Expeditionary Force Advanced Encryption Standard, Advanced Encryption AES System ARM (Autonomic Response Mechanism) and Emitter AESLAE Survivability/Lethality Analysis Environment AFWL AETF Army Evaluation Task Force AEW&C Airborne Early Warning and Control AF Air Force AFARS Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement AFATDS Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System AFIS Advanced Fire Inhibit System AFD Army Functional Dictionary AFMS Army Force Management School AFV Armored Fighting Vehicles AFWA Air Force Weather Agency AGCCS Army Global Command and Control System AGL Above Ground Level AGM Attack Guidance Matrix; Air-to-Ground Missile AGPP Army-Wide GTA Prioritization Program AGR Active/Guard Reserve AGTF Air Ground Task Force AGTFT Anti Jam GPS Technology Flight Test AH Attack Helicopter AH-64 Apache Attack Helicopter AHS Ammunition Handling System Affordability Initiative; Area of Influence; Area of Interest; AI Artificial Intelligence AIAA American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. AIAP Army Information Assurance Program AIC Architecture Integration Center AIDR Automated Intrusion Detection Response AIEWS Advanced Integrated Electronic Warfare System ARCADM (Army Core Architecture Data Model) AIGD Implementation Guidance Document AIGIS Army Imagery and Geospatial Information and Services AIM Acquisition Information Management (System) AIMD Architecture Integration Management Division - 3 - AIMMM Artificially Intelligent Managers Media Model AIMP Army Intelligence Master Plan AIMS Automated Instructional Management System AIMS-R Automated Instructional Management System-Redesign AIPC Architecture Integration and Processing Center (TRADOC) AIPD Army Institute for Professional Development AIPP Architecture Inter-Operability Pilot Program AIS Automated Information Systems AIS PASS ABCS 6.
Recommended publications
  • FM 3-100.21. Operational Contract Support Tactics, Techniques, And
    *ATTP 4-10 (FM 3-100.21) OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES June 2011 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Headquarters, Department of the Army This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online (www.us.army.mil) and General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library at (www.train.army.mil). *ATTP 4-10 (FM 3-100.21) Army Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures Headquarters No. 4-10 (FM 3-100.21) Department of the Army Washington, DC, 20 June 2011 OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT TACTICS, TECHNIQUES, AND PROCEDURES Contents Page FORWARD ............................................................................................................ iii PREFACE.............................................................................................................. iv Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1-1 Chapter 2 OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT STRUCTURE AND RELATED ORGANIZATIONAL INITIATIVES ..................................................................... 2-1 Chapter 3 OPERATIONAL LEVEL PLANNING ................................................................. 3-1 Chapter 4 TACTICAL PLANNING AND EXECUTION ....................................................... 4-1 Chapter 5 CONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT ....................................................................... 5-1 Appendix A OPERATIONAL LEVEL CHECKLIST ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Distributed Kill Chains: Drawing Insights for Mosaic Warfare from the Immune System and from the Navy
    Distributed Kill Chains NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE C O R P O R A T I O N NICHOLAS A. O’DONOUGHUE, SAMANTHA MCBIRNEY, n Mosaic warfare, individual warfighting platforms are assembled—like BRIAN PERSONS the ceramic tiles in mosaics—to make a larger picture or, in this case, a force package. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is developing this novel warfighting construct to acquire, field, and employ forces. To reveal the value of Mosaic warfare and uncover Distributed Kill Ipotential challenges in the transition to this system, the authors of this report present a pair of case studies: (1) an analysis of the human immune system’s response to pathogens and (2) an analysis of the U.S. Navy’s Naval Integrated Fire Control—Counter Air (NIFC-CA) project. Chains Noting that the human immune system has evolved over 500 million years to exhibit mosaiclike properties—meaning that these properties have Drawing Insights for Mosaic Warfare from the conferred some evolutionary advantage—the authors suggest that Mosaic Immune System and from the Navy warfare might have similar advantages, such as resilience and adaptability, over other approaches to defeating a threat. They then discuss lessons and best practices from the NIFC-CA project, which largely owes its success to its unique approach to development and fielding. For example, NIFC-CA used preexisting testing infrastructure; approached testing in a scientific manner, in which failure was viewed as a learning opportunity rather than a setback; and had a lengthy development timeline. From these lessons, the authors derive a cohesive set of policy recommendations for DARPA.
    [Show full text]
  • Teams of Leaders: the Next Multiplier
    No. 07-2 Landpower Essay May 2007 An Institute of Land Warfare Publication Teams of Leaders: The Next Multiplier by Zeb B. Bradford, Jr. and Frederic J. Brown Introduction Effective communications have been a critical component of command and control throughout the ages of conflict. Recently there has been national focus on ensuring ability to communicate among complex systems across all Department of Defense (DoD) operations—the Defense Enterprise. Now with the demands of waging and winning the complex Long War, effective communications and derivative new national security decision-supporting capabilities need to be extended fully to joint, interagency, intergovernmental and multinational (JIIM) operations. The overarching military vision has been the enabling of joint net-centric operations as an important part of the U.S. Revolution in Military Affairs—force transformation. Soon after the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks on the U.S. homeland, confirming tactical success achieved by vastly improved communications was demonstrated in operations in Afghanistan—the horse- mounted Special Forces Soldier employing strategic airpower tactically and successfully. This was a powerful example of an unprecedented capability to collaborate across jurisdictions with decisive effects. There has been an enormous and generally successful effort to extend this capability across various functional areas of both the generating and the operating forces of America’s Army. From the top down, ubiquitous information technology (IT) in both classified and unclassified domains extends globally from the corps joint task force level and above to the squad level with the emerging Land Warrior system. The wholly correct and successful focus has been to provide leaders at all echelons with timely data and information with appropriate security.
    [Show full text]
  • Fy2010 Defense Budget
    U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F D E F E N S E FISCAL YEAR 2010 BUDGET REQUEST S U M M A R Y J U S T I F I C A T I O N • M A Y 2 0 0 9 On behalf of the President, I am pleased to transmit to Congress this volume that presents the Department of Defense’s budget request of $533.8 billion for Fiscal Year 2010. The purpose of the Secretary’s Summary Justification is to inform Cong ress and provide the American people a clear understanding of how their tax dollars are being invested to provide for our Nation’s defense. It includes: • An explanation of the Department’s missions, accomplishments, and priorities; • A summary of the request by Military Department and Defense agencies; • Information on special areas of interest and emphasis for Fiscal Year 2010; and • Details on the Department’s major weapons programs. The Military Departments and Defense agencies will provide Congress with additional detailed justification materials on this request. The requested funds would: provide military pay, benefits, and world-class healthcare for 2.3 million Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, and Airmen ($163.9 billion); support military operations and force readiness ($160.9 billion); invest in modernization ($186.1 billion); and support family housing and facilities ($23.0 billion). In addition to the $533.8 billion request, the Administration requests $130.0 billion for Fiscal Year 2010 to support ongoing Overseas Contingency Operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Theater Missile Defense: Issues for Congress
    Order Code IB98028 CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Theater Missile Defense: Issues for Congress Updated March 19, 2001 Robert Shuey Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress CONTENTS SUMMARY MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Patriot PAC-3 (Patriot Advanced Capability-3, MIM-104 Patriot/ERINT) Navy Area Missile Defense Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS) Theater High-Altitude Air Defense (THAAD) Navy Theater Wide Defense Airborne Laser (ABL) Systems Description Regional Theater Missile Defense Options NATO TMD Cooperation The Israeli “Arrow” and Regional Defense Gulf Cooperation Council Theater Missile Defense East Asia Theater Missile Defense Issues for Congress TMD Funding Pace of Development and Schedules of Deployment Redundancy of TMD Systems ABM Treaty Implication Program Management 106th Congress Legislation IB98028 03-19-01 Theater Missile Defense: Issues for Congress SUMMARY U.S. troops deployed abroad and U.S. smaller programs. It also required that NTW allies are increasingly threatened by biological, and THAAD be funded and managed as sepa- chemical, and even nuclear weapons that could rate programs, contrary to the BMDO plan to be delivered by ballistic or cruise missiles. have them compete for funds from a single Missile production by North Korea and Iran line. has caused concern and has generated consid- erable support in Congress to develop and The Bush Administration announced it deploy missile defense systems. would request an additional $1 billion for national and theater missile defense for FY For fiscal year 2001, the President 2002. requested about $2.5 billion for Theater Mis- sile Defense (TMD), $400 million less than the THAAD successfully intercepted Hera amount approved the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruise Missiles and NATO Missile Defense Under the Radar? ______
    PPrroolliiffeerraattiioonn PPaappeerrss ______________________________________________________________________ Cruise Missiles and NATO Missile Defense Under the Radar? ______________________________________________________________________ In collaboration with the Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) Dennis M. Gormley Spring 2012 Security Studies Center The Institut Français des Relations Internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. Thérèse Delpech (1948 – 2012) Thérèse Delpech passed away on January 18, 2012. As Director of Strategic Affairs of the French Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), Thérèse was instrumental in promoting and supporting several research programs on proliferation in France and abroad. But for her and her continuous support along the years, the Proliferation Papers would not exist. Ifri’s Security
    [Show full text]
  • National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018
    1 115TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 115–200 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ON H.R. 2810 together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] JULY 6, 2017.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:45 Jul 07, 2017 Jkt 026108 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6012 Sfmt 6012 E:\HR\OC\HR200.XXX HR200 congress.#13 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:45 Jul 07, 2017 Jkt 026108 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 E:\HR\OC\HR200.XXX HR200 1 115TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 115–200 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ON H.R. 2810 together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] JULY 6, 2017.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 26–108 WASHINGTON : 2017 VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:45 Jul 07, 2017 Jkt 026108 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR200.XXX HR200 congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS WILLIAM M. ‘‘MAC’’ THORNBERRY, Texas, Chairman WALTER B. JONES, North Carolina ADAM SMITH, Washington JOE WILSON, South Carolina ROBERT A.
    [Show full text]
  • January 06 .Pmd
    VOL: 15, ISSUE: 1 JAN 2006 A QUARTERLY FORUM FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Pvt. Kueth Dolvony from the 14th Cavalry Regiment, 172nd Stryker Brigade Combat Team, provides security behind a house while fellow Soldiers enter the front during a weapons cache search near Rawah, Iraq. by Tech. Sgt. Andy Dunaway INSIDE“ TRAINING“ 2 SMA COMMENTS The Army Combat Uniform. BLOGS AND OPSEC 4-7 NEWS U CAN USE Everyone likes express- ing themselves. Some Soldiers are doing so through Web logs, but ON POINT not all of the posts are “ fun and games when the GAINEY MAKES HISTORY enemy can read them too. 12-15 Sgt. Maj. Lisa Hunter Command Sgt. Maj. William “Joe” Gainey is embarking on a historic tour of duty as the new STAY ARMY, GET PERKS senior enlisted advisor to When faced with decisions the Chairman of the Joint affecting their lives in the Chiefs of Staff. 8-11 Army and over the next Dave Crozier decade or so, more options are now available for Soldiers who ON THE COVER: choose to “Stay Army.” Spc. Jorge Delgado, 1st Squadron, 9th Staff Sgt. Krishna M. Gamble Cavalry Regiment, 4th Brigade 16-17 Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Bliss, Texas, sits in front of a laptop to help illustrate the dangers of putting sensitive information on Get the NCO Journal online at https://www.bliss. open source Web logs and emails. PHOTO BY: Dave Crozier army.mil/usasma/usasma-NCOJournal.asp TRAINING“ ALIBIS AKO IS ALL GROWN UP AKO has come a long PHOTO JOURNAL way since its humble Another fine selection of military beginnings and is now photos of Soldiers getting the job considered by many as done.
    [Show full text]
  • Raytheon 2007 Annual Report
    Raytheon 2007 Annual Report Raytheon Company Raytheon 2007 Annual Report 870 Winter Street Waltham, Massachusetts 02451-1449 USA www.raytheon.com rray_version_03-31-08_Press_Cover.indday_version_03-31-08_Press_Cover.indd OCVRSOCVRS 44/3/08/3/08 22:23:00:23:00 AAMM Raytheon Financial Highlights Years ended December 31 2005 2006 2007 In millions, except per share amounts Backlog $ 31,528 $ 33,838 $ 36,614 Sales 18,491 19,707 21,301 Operating Income 1,619 1,944 2,328 1 Income from Continuing Operations (Adjusted in 2007) 898 1,187 1,474 1 Diluted EPS from Continuing Operations (Adjusted in 2007) 1.98 2.63 3.31 Operating Cash Flow from Continuing Operations 2,352 2,477 1,249 Dividends Declared per Share 0.88 0.96 1.02 Debt to Capital 29.3 % 26.3 % 15.3 % 2 1 Return on Invested Capital (Adjusted in 2007) 6.5 % 8.3 % 9.5 % BACKLOG NET SALES OPERATING INCOME ROIC2 In billions, except percentages $36.6 $21.3 $2.3 9.5% 8.3% $33.8 $19.7 $1.9 $31.5 $18.5 6.5% $1.6 $29.9 5.4% $17.4 4.9% $1.3 $1.3 $15.6 $25.3 03 04 05 06 07 03 04 05 06 07 03 04 05 06 07 03 04 05 06 07 1 Excludes $219 million or $0.49 per diluted share tax-related benefit as described on page 39 of the Form 10K included within this report. 2007 Income from Continuing Operations was $1,693 million and 2007 Diluted EPS from Continuing Operations was $3.80.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments and Future Trends in Phased Arrays Dr
    Recent Developments and Future Trends in Phased Arrays Dr. Eli Brookner Raytheon Co., 528 Boston Post Road, Sudbury, MA 01776 Tel: 978-440-4007; Fax: 978-440-3000; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: An update is here given of the amazing advances in phased arrays from small low cost arrays to large arrays. Now >500 A/C AESAs have been deployed with > 400,000 operational flight hours; >1.8 million T/Rs manufactured; over a million blind spot car radars manufactured; Patriot upgraded to 2012 state-of-the- art; 8 AN/TPY-2s delivered and 5 more to be built; JLENS, CJR, AN/SPY-3 and Dual Band Radar about to be deployed; DBF advancing with Australian S-band CEAFAR, which has A/D at each element, having undergone sea tests; AMDR and Space Fence have undergone their initial development phase; GaN allowing 5x power for same footprint as GaAs; 3D integrated circuit digital chips in production - Moore's Law marches on; DARPA looking at developing a low cost 94 GHz array with a cost goal of $1/element; DARPA COSMOS program taking monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MMIC) to the next level allowing mixed signal integration. Figure 1 (Courtesy of Raytheon) Keywords: Multi-mode, multi-function family of AESA radars deliver a Phased array, AESA, radar, active arrays, passive arrays, dramatic increase in warfighter capability -- including simultaneous air-to-air and air-to-ground operations, along with superior PATRIOT, JLENS, THAAD, AN/TPY-2, Cobra Judy Replacement, detection, targeting, tracking and self-protection features. CJR, AMDR, Space Fence Radar, Three-Dimensional Expeditionary Long Range Radar, 3DELRR, MPAR, NexGen, 1.3 PATRIOT UPGRADE: Dual Band Radar, SPY-3, graphene, metamaterials, The Patriot, Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Supplement to the Dod Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms
    NAVY TACTICAL REFERENCE PUBLICATION NAVY SUPPLEMENT TO THE DOD DICTIONARY OF MILITARY AND ASSOCIATED TERMS NTRP 1-02 EDITION APR 2011 UNCLASSIFIED DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION IS UNLIMITED. PRIMARY REVIEW AUTHORITY: COMMANDER, NAVY WARFARE DEVELOPMENT COMMAND STOCK NUMBER: 0411LP1090273 Form Approved Report Documentation Page OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 3. DATES COVERED 2. REPORT TYPE APR 2011 00-00-2011 to 00-00-2011 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER Navy Supplement To The DOD Dictionary Of Military And Associated 5b. GRANT NUMBER Terms 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Commander, Navy Warfare Development Command,ATTN: N5T,1530 REPORT NUMBER Gilbert Street, Suite 2128,Norfolk,VA,23511 9.
    [Show full text]
  • FMI 6-02.45. Signal Support to Theater Operations
    FMI 6-02.45 Signal Support to Theater Operations July 2007 Expires: July 2009 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online (www.us.army.mil) and General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library at (www.train.army.mil). *FMI 6-02.45 Field Manual Interim Headquarters No. 6-02.45 Department of the Army Washington, DC, 5 July 2007 Expires: 5 July 2009 Signal Support to Theater Operations Contents Page PREFACE .............................................................................................................iv INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................v Chapter 1 THE JOINT FORCE AND ARMY NETWORKS ................................................ 1-1 Section I – Joint and Army Operations .......................................................... 1-1 Understanding “Jointness” ................................................................................. 1-1 Section II – The Modular Army and Joint Networks ..................................... 1-5 Modularity ........................................................................................................... 1-5 Section III – Changes in Theater Signal ......................................................... 1-9 Army Network Operational Environment............................................................ 1-9 Chapter 2 THEATER NETWORK SUPPORT AND THE LANDWARNET .......................
    [Show full text]