Recent Developments and Future Trends in Phased Arrays Dr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Recent Developments and Future Trends in Phased Arrays Dr Recent Developments and Future Trends in Phased Arrays Dr. Eli Brookner Raytheon Co., 528 Boston Post Road, Sudbury, MA 01776 Tel: 978-440-4007; Fax: 978-440-3000; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: An update is here given of the amazing advances in phased arrays from small low cost arrays to large arrays. Now >500 A/C AESAs have been deployed with > 400,000 operational flight hours; >1.8 million T/Rs manufactured; over a million blind spot car radars manufactured; Patriot upgraded to 2012 state-of-the- art; 8 AN/TPY-2s delivered and 5 more to be built; JLENS, CJR, AN/SPY-3 and Dual Band Radar about to be deployed; DBF advancing with Australian S-band CEAFAR, which has A/D at each element, having undergone sea tests; AMDR and Space Fence have undergone their initial development phase; GaN allowing 5x power for same footprint as GaAs; 3D integrated circuit digital chips in production - Moore's Law marches on; DARPA looking at developing a low cost 94 GHz array with a cost goal of $1/element; DARPA COSMOS program taking monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MMIC) to the next level allowing mixed signal integration. Figure 1 (Courtesy of Raytheon) Keywords: Multi-mode, multi-function family of AESA radars deliver a Phased array, AESA, radar, active arrays, passive arrays, dramatic increase in warfighter capability -- including simultaneous air-to-air and air-to-ground operations, along with superior PATRIOT, JLENS, THAAD, AN/TPY-2, Cobra Judy Replacement, detection, targeting, tracking and self-protection features. CJR, AMDR, Space Fence Radar, Three-Dimensional Expeditionary Long Range Radar, 3DELRR, MPAR, NexGen, 1.3 PATRIOT UPGRADE: Dual Band Radar, SPY-3, graphene, metamaterials, The Patriot, Fig. 2a, has undergone a major upgrade. From the electromagnetic band-gap material, EBG, orbital angular tip of its nose cone to the base of its radar, designers have momentum, OAM, MEMS, FPGA, SAR, car radar, signal processing 1. PRODUCTION, UPGRADES, DEVELOPMENTS: This paper is an update of [1-7]. 1.1 T/R MODULE PRODUCTION: Raytheon alone has produced more than 1.8 million AESA (active electronically scanned array) T/R modules to date. 1.2 AIRCRAFT AESAs USING MIMC: Raytheon Company alone has delivered more than 500 tactical aircraft active electronically scanned array (AESA) radars for multiple platforms worldwide. These AESA include the APG- 79, APG-63(V)3 and APG-82(V)1 radars which have achieved more than 400,000 cumulative operational flight hours on F-15, F/A-18E/F and EA-18G aircraft; see Fig. 1. These Figure 2a 978-1-4673-1127-4/12/$31.00 ©2013 IEEE 43 circuits in the radar and command stations, shrinking and speeding up components. The missile’s mobile control room got a major makeover, with huge touch screens, faster computers and sleek black keyboards replacing banks of controls. In the factory brand-new machinery installed capable of installing 30,000 components an hour. In the radar, one assembly that took 435 circuit cards is now down to five. Sixteen power supplies were combined into one. Wiring that used to require 31 cables now takes 10. New advances have also made the Patriot easier to maintain. Antenna elements no longer have to be sent back to the factory for repair. They can be replaced right in the field. 1.4 AN/TPY-2: Figure 2b. (Photo Courtesy of Raytheon) Depending on the needs of the warfighter, the AN/TPY-2 radar (Fig. 3) can be deployed in two different modes. In forward- invested more than $400 million into Patriot in the last four years as part of a massive program aimed at making the Patriot air and missile defense system faster, smarter, tougher and more reliable. Miniature components (see Fig. 2b) have replaced racks of equipment. Touchscreens have replaced control panels. New machines in Raytheon’s Andover, Mass. factory are making parts lighter, stronger and longer-lasting. Engineers are now giving Patriot the ability to see further by connecting it to Raytheon’s system of radar-carrying airships, the Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System, or JLENS. In April, a Patriot missile used information from a JLENS to smash a target out of the sky at a Figure 3 AN/TPY-2 (Photo Courtesy of Raytheon) test range in Utah. The Patriot also works in coordination with Based mode, the radar is positioned near hostile territory, and The Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) System as acquires ballistic missiles in the boost (ascent) phase of flight, part of a strong, coordinated two-tier defense system against shortly after they are launched. It then tracks and incoming theater ballistic missiles. The Patriot is the lower-tier discriminates the threat, and passes critical information and the THAAD the upper-tier. The X-band 25,000 element required by decision makers to the Command and Control AN/TPY-2 is the radar sensor for the THAAD system. Over Battle Management network. 200 Patriot systems have been deployed around the world. When the AN/TPY-2 radar is deployed in terminal mode, the With its new technology the new Patriot can take on any threat in radar’s job is to detect, acquire, track and discriminate ballistic missiles in the terminal (descent) phase of flight. The terminal- the world. It can counter emerging and evolving threats from mode AN/TPY-2 also leads the Terminal High Altitude Area SRBMs, as well as those from cruise missiles, drones, and fighter Defense ballistic missile defense system by guiding the THAAD and bomber aircraft. It has undergone more than 1,000 real- missile to intercept a threat. world flight tests, and more than 2,500 search and track tests. Eight AN/TPY-2s have been delivered to date and three more Patriot was state-of-the-art in 1982 when it was delivered into the are to be built for U.S. and two for overseas. U.S. Army inventory, and Patriot is state-of-the-art in 2012 when it was delivered to the UAE inventory. The U.S. government and other partners in the program have helped fund the 1.5 JLENS: modernization, but it was an order for new Patriot systems for the United Arab Emirates that gave designers the chance to Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System (JLENS; Fig. 4) is an elevated, persistent reengineer Patriot from the ground up in late 2008. The first new GEM-T missile streaked into the sky at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico in August 2011, followed by a test firing of the first complete, new-production Patriot system in March 2012. The U.S. Army plans to field Patriot through 2048. The system had already gone through several upgrades since its debut in the first Gulf War. But designers now gave the Patriot missile a faster, more accurate guidance system known as Guidance-Enhanced Missile – Tactical, or GEM-T. They rewired 44 Figure 4 Photo Courtesy of Raytheon over-the-horizon aerostat sensor system. It uses a powerful integrated radar system to detect, track and target a variety of threats. This capability better enables commanders to defend against threats including hostile cruise missiles; low-flying manned and unmanned aircraft; and moving surface vehicles such as boats, automobiles and trucks; and to provide ascent- phase detection of tactical ballistic missiles and large caliber rockets. ∙ A JLENS system, referred to as an orbit, consists of two tethered, 74-meter helium filled aerostats connected to mobile mooring stations and communications and processing groups. JLENS aerostats fly as high as 10,000 feet and can remain aloft and operational for up to 30 days. ∙ One aerostat carries surveillance radar with 360-degree Figure 5 Photo Courtesy of Raytheon surveillance capability; the other aerostat carries fire control radar. ∙ According to research conducted by the U.S. Army's JLENS Product office, the cost of operating large, fixed-wing surveillance aircraft is 5-7 times greater than the cost of operating JLENS. ∙ The JLENS surveillance radar can simultaneously track hundreds of threats; the fire control radar can simultaneously target dozens of threats. "JLENS' TBMD capability gives combatant commanders another tool they can use to help protect the U.S., deployed forces, our allies and friends from the growing ballistic missile threat," said Dean Barten, the U.S. Army's JLENS program manager. "JLENS' TBMD capability, when coupled with its ability to conduct 360-degree long-range surveillance capability and simultaneously detect and engage threats like swarming boats and anti-ship cruise missiles from up to 340 miles away, gives commanders a powerful proven capability." As indicated above JLENS has been connected to Patriot to give it the ability to see further. JLENS demonstrated tactical ballistic missile defense (TBMD) Fig. 5b CJR Team celebrate a successful first live-launch. capability when it detected and tracked a total of four ballistic- missile surrogates on their ascent (boost) phase during tests at the White Sands Missile Range, N.M., Feb. 19, 2013. As a result enemy tactical ballistic missiles will soon be easier to detect and It surpassed expectations during its first tests against a live track. Along with other X-Band radars, JLENS can provide a rocket launch on March 19. From approximately 100 miles off robust early warning and tracking capability against ballistic the Florida coast, the powerful X- and S-band radars integrated missiles. This TBMD demonstration and JLENS' other recent successes prove that the system is ready to deploy for a onboard the USNS Howard O. Lorenzen (T-AGM 25) combatant commander operational evaluation. JLENS successfully acquired and tracked both stages of an Atlas V demonstrated its capability against cruise missiles when it rocket launched from Cape Canaveral and collected all enabled Patriot and Standard Missile-6 intercepts of cruise- associated data.
Recommended publications
  • Distributed Kill Chains: Drawing Insights for Mosaic Warfare from the Immune System and from the Navy
    Distributed Kill Chains NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE C O R P O R A T I O N NICHOLAS A. O’DONOUGHUE, SAMANTHA MCBIRNEY, n Mosaic warfare, individual warfighting platforms are assembled—like BRIAN PERSONS the ceramic tiles in mosaics—to make a larger picture or, in this case, a force package. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is developing this novel warfighting construct to acquire, field, and employ forces. To reveal the value of Mosaic warfare and uncover Distributed Kill Ipotential challenges in the transition to this system, the authors of this report present a pair of case studies: (1) an analysis of the human immune system’s response to pathogens and (2) an analysis of the U.S. Navy’s Naval Integrated Fire Control—Counter Air (NIFC-CA) project. Chains Noting that the human immune system has evolved over 500 million years to exhibit mosaiclike properties—meaning that these properties have Drawing Insights for Mosaic Warfare from the conferred some evolutionary advantage—the authors suggest that Mosaic Immune System and from the Navy warfare might have similar advantages, such as resilience and adaptability, over other approaches to defeating a threat. They then discuss lessons and best practices from the NIFC-CA project, which largely owes its success to its unique approach to development and fielding. For example, NIFC-CA used preexisting testing infrastructure; approached testing in a scientific manner, in which failure was viewed as a learning opportunity rather than a setback; and had a lengthy development timeline. From these lessons, the authors derive a cohesive set of policy recommendations for DARPA.
    [Show full text]
  • Threading the Needle Proposals for U.S
    “Few actions could have a more important impact on U.S.-China relations than returning to the spirit of the U.S.-China Joint Communique of August 17, 1982, signed by our countries’ leaders. This EastWest Institute policy study is a bold and pathbreaking effort to demystify the issue of arms sales to Taiwan, including the important conclusion that neither nation is adhering to its commitment, though both can offer reasons for their actions and views. That is the first step that should lead to honest dialogue and practical steps the United States and China could take to improve this essential relationship.” – George Shultz, former U.S. Secretary of State “This EastWest Institute report represents a significant and bold reframing of an important and long- standing issue. The authors advance the unconventional idea that it is possible to adhere to existing U.S. law and policy, respect China’s legitimate concerns, and stand up appropriately for Taiwan—all at the same time. I believe EWI has, in fact, ‘threaded the needle’ on an exceedingly challenging policy problem and identified a highly promising solution-set in the sensible center: a modest voluntary capping of annual U.S. arms deliveries to Taiwan relative to historical levels concurrent to a modest, but not inconsequential Chinese reduction of its force posture vis-à-vis Taiwan. This study merits serious high-level attention.” – General (ret.) James L. Jones, former U.S. National Security Advisor “I commend co-authors Piin-Fen Kok and David Firestein for taking on, with such skill and methodological rigor, a difficult issue at the core of U.S-China relations: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Able Archers: Taiwan Defense Strategy in an Age of Precision Strike
    (Image Source: Wired.co.uk) Able Archers Taiwan Defense Strategy in an Age of Precision Strike IAN EASTON September 2014 |Able Archers: Taiwan Defense Strategy and Precision Strike | Draft for Comment Able Archers: Taiwan Defense Strategy in an Age of Precision Strike September 2014 About the Project 2049 Institute The Project 2049 Institute seeks to guide decision makers toward a more secure Asia by the century’s Cover Image Source: Wired.co.uk mid-point. Located in Arlington, Virginia, the organization fills a gap in the public policy realm Above Image: Chung Shyang UAV at Taiwan’s 2007 National Day Parade through forward-looking, region-specific research on alternative security and policy solutions. Its Above Image Source: Wikimedia interdisciplin ary approach draws on rigorous analysis of socioeconomic, governance, military, environmental, technological and political trends, and input from key players in the region, with an eye toward educating the public and informing policy debate. ii |Able Archers: Taiwan Defense Strategy and Precision Strike | Draft for Comment About the Author Ian Easton is a research fellow at the Project 2049 Institute, where he studies defense and security issues in Asia. During the summer of 2013 , he was a visiting fellow at the Japan Institute for International Affairs (JIIA) in Tokyo. Previously, he worked as a China analyst at the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA). He lived in Taipei from 2005 to 2010. During his time in Taiwan he worked as a translator for Island Technologies Inc. and the Foundation for Asia-Pacific Peace Studies. He also conducted research with the Asia Bureau Chief of Defense News.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-16-6R, Space Situational Awareness
    441 G St. N.W. Washington, DC 20548 October 8, 2015 The Honorable John McCain Chairman The Honorable Jack Reed Ranking Member Committee on Armed Services United States Senate Space Situational Awareness: Status of Efforts and Planned Budgets Space systems provide capabilities essential for a broad array of functions and objectives, including U.S. national security, commerce and economic growth, transportation safety, and homeland security. These systems are increasingly vulnerable to a variety of threats, both intentional and unintentional—ranging from adversary attacks such as antisatellite weapons, signal jamming, and cyber attacks, to environmental threats such as electromagnetic radiation from the Sun and collisions with other objects. The government relies primarily on the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Intelligence Community to provide Space Situational Awareness (SSA)—the current and predictive knowledge and characterization of space objects and the operational environment upon which space operations depend—to provide critical data for planning, operating, and protecting space assets and to inform government and military operations. According to DOD, as space has become more congested and contested, the SSA mission focus has expanded from awareness of the location and movement of space objects to also include assessments of their capabilities and intent to provide battlespace awareness for protecting U.S. and allies’ people and assets. For example, in addition to allowing satellite operators to predict and avoid radio frequency interference and potential collisions with other space objects, SSA information could be used to determine the cause of space system failures—such as environmental effects, unintentional interference, or adversary attacks—better enabling decision makers to determine appropriate responses.
    [Show full text]
  • Fy2010 Defense Budget
    U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F D E F E N S E FISCAL YEAR 2010 BUDGET REQUEST S U M M A R Y J U S T I F I C A T I O N • M A Y 2 0 0 9 On behalf of the President, I am pleased to transmit to Congress this volume that presents the Department of Defense’s budget request of $533.8 billion for Fiscal Year 2010. The purpose of the Secretary’s Summary Justification is to inform Cong ress and provide the American people a clear understanding of how their tax dollars are being invested to provide for our Nation’s defense. It includes: • An explanation of the Department’s missions, accomplishments, and priorities; • A summary of the request by Military Department and Defense agencies; • Information on special areas of interest and emphasis for Fiscal Year 2010; and • Details on the Department’s major weapons programs. The Military Departments and Defense agencies will provide Congress with additional detailed justification materials on this request. The requested funds would: provide military pay, benefits, and world-class healthcare for 2.3 million Soldiers, Sailors, Marines, and Airmen ($163.9 billion); support military operations and force readiness ($160.9 billion); invest in modernization ($186.1 billion); and support family housing and facilities ($23.0 billion). In addition to the $533.8 billion request, the Administration requests $130.0 billion for Fiscal Year 2010 to support ongoing Overseas Contingency Operations.
    [Show full text]
  • System Study and Design of Broad-Band U-Slot Microstrip Patch Antennas for Aperstructures and Opportunistic Arrays
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2005-12 System study and design of broad-band U-Slot microstrip patch antennas for aperstructures and opportunistic arrays Tong, Chin Hong Matthew Monterey California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1802 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS SYSTEM STUDY AND DESIGN OF BROAD-BAND U-SLOT MICROSTRIP PATCH ANTENNAS FOR APERSTRUCTURES AND OPPORTUNISTIC ARRAYS by Tong, Chin Hong Matthew December 2005 Thesis Advisor: David C. Jenn Co-Advisor: Donald L. Walters Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2005 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: System Study and Design of Broad-band U-Slot 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Microstrip Patch Antennas for Aperstructures and Opportunistic Arrays 6. AUTHOR(S) Tong, Chin Hong Matthew 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Theater Missile Defense: Issues for Congress
    Order Code IB98028 CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Theater Missile Defense: Issues for Congress Updated March 19, 2001 Robert Shuey Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress CONTENTS SUMMARY MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Patriot PAC-3 (Patriot Advanced Capability-3, MIM-104 Patriot/ERINT) Navy Area Missile Defense Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS) Theater High-Altitude Air Defense (THAAD) Navy Theater Wide Defense Airborne Laser (ABL) Systems Description Regional Theater Missile Defense Options NATO TMD Cooperation The Israeli “Arrow” and Regional Defense Gulf Cooperation Council Theater Missile Defense East Asia Theater Missile Defense Issues for Congress TMD Funding Pace of Development and Schedules of Deployment Redundancy of TMD Systems ABM Treaty Implication Program Management 106th Congress Legislation IB98028 03-19-01 Theater Missile Defense: Issues for Congress SUMMARY U.S. troops deployed abroad and U.S. smaller programs. It also required that NTW allies are increasingly threatened by biological, and THAAD be funded and managed as sepa- chemical, and even nuclear weapons that could rate programs, contrary to the BMDO plan to be delivered by ballistic or cruise missiles. have them compete for funds from a single Missile production by North Korea and Iran line. has caused concern and has generated consid- erable support in Congress to develop and The Bush Administration announced it deploy missile defense systems. would request an additional $1 billion for national and theater missile defense for FY For fiscal year 2001, the President 2002. requested about $2.5 billion for Theater Mis- sile Defense (TMD), $400 million less than the THAAD successfully intercepted Hera amount approved the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • Countermeasures.Pdf
    Countermeasures Study group organized by the Union of Concerned Scientists and the Security Studies Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Countermeasures A Technical Evaluation of the Operational Effectiveness of the Planned US National Missile Defense System Andrew M. Sessler (Chair of the Study Group), John M. Cornwall, Bob Dietz, Steve Fetter, Sherman Frankel, Richard L. Garwin, Kurt Gottfried, Lisbeth Gronlund, George N. Lewis, Theodore A. Postol, David C. Wright April 2000 Union of Concerned Scientists MIT Security Studies Program © 2000 Union of Concerned Scientists Acknowledgments All rights reserved The authors would like to thank Tom Collina, Stuart Kiang, Matthew Meselson, and Jeremy Broughton for their comments and assistance. The authors owe a special note of The Union of Concerned Scientists is a partnership of citizens and gratitude to Eryn MacDonald scientists working to build a cleaner environment and a safer world. For and Anita Spiess for their more information about UCS’s work on arms control and international contributions and dedication, security, visit the UCS website at www.ucsusa.org. without which this report The Security Studies Program (SSP) is a graduate-level research and would not have been possible. educational program based at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Center for International Studies. The program’s primary task is educating the next generation of scholars and practitioners in This report and its dissemina- international security policymaking. SSP supports the research work of graduate students, faculty, and fellows, and sponsors seminars, confer- tion were funded in part by ences, and publications to bring its teaching and research results to the grants to the Union of Con- attention of wider audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruise Missiles and NATO Missile Defense Under the Radar? ______
    PPrroolliiffeerraattiioonn PPaappeerrss ______________________________________________________________________ Cruise Missiles and NATO Missile Defense Under the Radar? ______________________________________________________________________ In collaboration with the Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) Dennis M. Gormley Spring 2012 Security Studies Center The Institut Français des Relations Internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. Thérèse Delpech (1948 – 2012) Thérèse Delpech passed away on January 18, 2012. As Director of Strategic Affairs of the French Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), Thérèse was instrumental in promoting and supporting several research programs on proliferation in France and abroad. But for her and her continuous support along the years, the Proliferation Papers would not exist. Ifri’s Security
    [Show full text]
  • National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018
    1 115TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 115–200 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ON H.R. 2810 together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] JULY 6, 2017.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:45 Jul 07, 2017 Jkt 026108 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6012 Sfmt 6012 E:\HR\OC\HR200.XXX HR200 congress.#13 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:45 Jul 07, 2017 Jkt 026108 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 E:\HR\OC\HR200.XXX HR200 1 115TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 115–200 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 R E P O R T OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ON H.R. 2810 together with ADDITIONAL VIEWS [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] JULY 6, 2017.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 26–108 WASHINGTON : 2017 VerDate Sep 11 2014 10:45 Jul 07, 2017 Jkt 026108 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HR200.XXX HR200 congress.#13 COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS WILLIAM M. ‘‘MAC’’ THORNBERRY, Texas, Chairman WALTER B. JONES, North Carolina ADAM SMITH, Washington JOE WILSON, South Carolina ROBERT A.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Surveillance Gene H
    This Briefing Is Unclassified Space Surveillance Gene H. McCall Chief Scientist, United States Air Force Space Command Peterson AFB, CO UNCLASSIFED Space Surveillance • Surveillance and cataloging of space objects is a high priority mission for Air Force Space Command. • Both civil and military applications • Collision warnings are an important output • Includes cataloging and orbit predictions • Regularly published element sets • Modern space conditions demand ever increasing accuracy of both measurement and prediction. • Current standards are in need of revision 1/23/01 UNCLASSIFIED 2 UNCLASSIFED SSN Sensors and C2 Center Locations 1/23/01 UNCLASSIFIED 3 UNCLASSIFED Sensors and Command and Control (C2) • Three types of sensors that support the SSN • Dedicated. Space Surveillance is primary mission • Collateral. Space Surveillance is secondary or tertiary mission • Contributing. Non USSPACECOM sensors under contract to support space surveillance • There are two major C2 centers that manage the SSN • Air Force Space Control Center (AFSSC), in CMAS, CO • Primary C2 center • Naval Space Control Center (NSCC), in Dahlgren, VA • Equivalent backup to the AFSSC 1/23/01 UNCLASSIFIED 4 UNCLASSIFED MSX/SBV Mission MSX/SBV MSX/SBV • Primary Mission - Space Surveillance •Conduct space surveillance from space •Surveillance of entire geosynchronous belt •Assured access to objects of military interest 1/23/01 UNCLASSIFIED 5 UNCLASSIFED MSX/SBV Description MSX/SBV SBV • Strengths of space-based sensors • Access to all space • No weather outages • Reduced
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared Statement of Ian M. Easton Research Fellow Project 2049 Institute Before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission
    Prepared Statement of Ian M. Easton Research Fellow Project 2049 Institute before The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Hearing on China’s Relations with Taiwan and North Korea Thursday, June 5, 2014 Chairwoman Tobin and Chairman Slane and members of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, thank you for the opportunity to participate in this panel on cross-Strait security and military developments. This is a topic that is of critical importance to U.S. interests and peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region. I am honored to testify here today. Taiwan (also known as the Republic of China, or ROC) is steadily advancing its capacity to exercise military power in order to defend its national territorial sovereignty, market economy, and democratic system of government. Increasingly less constrained by institutional and technological barriers that have hampered it in the past, Taiwan has been investing in innovative and asymmetric capabilities to help offset its quantitative shortcomings in the face of a much larger adversary. The People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) still consider a future cross-Strait conflict to be their most challenging military planning scenario; and Taiwan and the United States are working hard together to make sure it stays that way. My presentation today will focus primarily on three areas of cross-Strait security developments. First, this presentation will discuss the ROC-PRC military balance and Taiwan’s military modernization program. Next, I will assess Taiwan’s ability to defend against non-kinetic threats and the U.S.-Taiwan military and security relationship.
    [Show full text]