Fvanderziel Master Thesis ... Ep2009.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fvanderziel Master Thesis ... Ep2009.Pdf Appendix Master thesis: Movable water barrier for the 21st century Technical University Delft Section: Hydraulic Structures F. van der Ziel BSc September 15, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Literature Study (conclusions only) ...................................................................................... 2 B. Inland Water Navigations..................................................................................................... 3 B.1 CEMT-classes ............................................................................................................... 3 B.2 Current Navigation ....................................................................................................... 5 B.3 Future Navigation ........................................................................................................ 6 C. Locations Descriptions and Selections .................................................................................. 9 C.1 Criteria ......................................................................................................................... 9 C.2 Spui ............................................................................................................................ 11 C.3 Dordtsche Kil .............................................................................................................. 16 C.4 Beneden Merwede ..................................................................................................... 20 C.5 Lek ............................................................................................................................. 26 D. Dimensions UOOC Barriers ................................................................................................ 28 D.1 Sill depth .................................................................................................................... 28 D.2 Required Width .......................................................................................................... 29 E. Water-storage and Water Heads........................................................................................ 30 E.1 Storage Capacity ........................................................................................................ 30 E.2 System Management ................................................................................................. 35 E.3 Expected Water Heads ............................................................................................... 40 F. Costs UOOC Barriers .......................................................................................................... 42 F.1 Barrier Table .............................................................................................................. 42 F.2 Costs estimation UOOC barriers ................................................................................. 44 G. Materials ........................................................................................................................... 49 G.1 Comparison Synthetic Fibers ...................................................................................... 49 G.2 Detaild Information Dyneema® Fiber .......................................................................... 54 G.3 Information PA Fibers ................................................................................................ 58 H. Variants ............................................................................................................................. 60 H.1 Design Tree ................................................................................................................ 60 H.2 Design Ideas ............................................................................................................... 63 I. Calculations ....................................................................................................................... 80 I.1 Definitions, Hydraulic loads and Safety Factors .......................................................... 80 I.2 Feasibility PA screen and Dyneema® cables ................................................................ 84 I.3 A-frame (support towers) ........................................................................................... 86 I.4 Cable Stayed Bridge ................................................................................................... 92 I.5 NPV .......................................................................................................................... 119 Used Sources Appendix ........................................................................................................... 128 Contents of Table : List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... 130 List of Tables ........................................................................................................................... 132 Appendix Appendix: Movable water barrier for the 21st century F. van der Ziel BSc, TUDelft 1 A. LITERATURE STUDY (CONCLUSIONS ONLY) The arguments for the construction of a water barrier from fabric are not changed over the years. A simple, fast construction, that is almost maintenance free and therefore a barrier with low total costs should be possible. In the 80teens and 90teens it was demonstrated that an ‘open fabric’ movable water barrier is technical possible. This was demonstrated by several researches that calculated a pre-chosen barrier and by Delft Hydraulics in a scale model test. The main reasons for not building a barrier with fabric were safety concerns. The prediction of the behaviour of the barrier and the lifetime of the material itself were difficult to estimated. These reasons are nowadays less significant. The ability to predict the behaviour of the barrier is increased by the fact that computers programs can simulate the mechanical behaviour of the barrier. Furthermore the lifetime of the material is proven to be long enough based on experience of a numeral applications in inflatable dams and separation screens. Another outcome of the literature study is that an elaborate research and optimization is not made for fabric water barriers. There were several problems indicated that can be (probably) solved with a good structural design. There is one thesis found that give some structural considerations but still focus on a pre-chosen type of fabric barrier. For example one of these barriers is called the “spinnaker” barrier. To open and close this barrier, the barrier is moved in the vertical and horizontal plane, there are several movable parts that make the barrier complex. Presumably there are some possibilities to design a more simplified structure. The literature study also indicates that an ‘open fabric’ water barrier is presumably more suitable in rivers as a weir or high water diverting structure, than as a storm surge barrier at sea or at a lake. This mainly because off the lack of high waves. Nevertheless the own-periods of the barrier are still very important for the stability of the barrier. Several possibilities are indicated to solve this issue of resonation. Going into more detail many design questions are unanswered. For example: - Is it useful to connect the fabric/screen on the sill? - How can the connection of the screen with the floating body or sill be detailed? - What is the best way to open and close the barrier? - How to minimize the wearing damage to the fabric when shifting along the sill and pillars? - How to store the fabric/screen? Overall; it can be concluded that the feasibility and restrictions of a open fabric water barrier are still not known. By given more inside information about the possibilities of this type of barrier, by several configurations, and a more optimized design this type of barrier may become the 21e century water barrier. MAIN RESOURCES: Driessen, A.H.K. "Berekening van de Spinnakerkering." Afstudeerrapport. 1998. Karelse, M.K. "Een flexibel separatiescherm in een drinkwaterbekken." Master Thesis. 1996. Knippels, A. and E. Pechtold. "Project Keersluis Heusdensch Kanaal." Thesis. Netherlands, 1992. Pilarczyk, Krystian W. "Geosynthetics and Geosystems in Hydraulic and Coastal Engineering." Rijkswaterstaat, Delft: A.A. Balkema, 2000. Regeling, H. J. Bouwdienst Rijkswaterstaat. "Spinnakerkering, oriëntatie onderzoek." only) (conclusions Study Literature : Modelonderzoek. 1989. Appendix Appendix: Movable water barrier for the 21st century F. van der Ziel BSc, TUDelft 2 B. INLAND WATER NAVIGATIONS In this appendix the inland (water/vessel) navigation in the Northern delta area is specified. The CEMT-classes, current and future navigation are mentioned. B.1 CEMT-CLASSES All the inland waterways are divided in CEMT-classes. These Europe navigation classes, defined by the Conférende Européenne des Ministres the Transport, indicated the maximum standard size of vessels that can be (and must be) accommodated on the waterway. In Figure 1 the classes for the northern delta are given for each waterway. Figure 1: CEMT-classes. (RWS 'c' 2007) (AVV) In Table 2 (on the next page) the standard vessel sizes are given for normal vessel, and for push- towing navigation (in Dutch ‘duwstel’). These values are the boundary conditions for the dimensioning of the barriers. Furthermore along the waterways, Lek, Beneden Merwede, Dordtsche Kil and Spui, are existing structures like bridges with navigation clearance and widths that can be taken as a minimum boundary condition.
Recommended publications
  • Rapport Toetsing Realisatiecijfers Vervoer Gevaarlijke Stoffen Over Het Water Aan De Risicoplafonds Basisnet
    RWS INFORMATIE Rapport toetsing realisatiecijfers vervoer gevaarlijke stoffen over het water aan de risicoplafonds Basisnet Jaar: 2018 Datum 20 mei 2019 Status Definitief RWS INFORMATIE Monitoringsrapportage water 2018 20 mei 2019 Colofon Uitgegeven door Rijkswaterstaat Informatie Mevr. M. Bakker, Dhr. G. Lems Telefoon 06-54674791, 06-21581392 Fax Uitgevoerd door Opmaak Datum 20 mei 2019 Status Definitief Versienummer 1 RWS INFORMATIE Monitoringsrapportage water 2018 20 mei 2019 Inhoud 1 Inleiding—6 1.1 Algemeen 1.2 Registratie en risicoberekening binnenvaart 1.3 Registratie en risicoberekening zeevaart 1.4 Referentiehoeveelheden 2 Toetsing aan de risicoplafonds—9 2.1 Overzicht toetsresultaten 2.2 Toetsresultaten per traject 2.3 Kwalitatieve risicoanalyse Basisnet-zeevaartroutes 3 Realisatie—13 Bijlage 1 ligging basisnetroutes per corridor Bijlage 2a realisatiecijfers binnenvaart op zeevaartroutes Bijlage 2b realisatiecijfers zeevaart op zeevaartroutes Bijlage 3 realisatiecijfers binnenvaart op binnenvaartroutes Bijlage 4 invoer en rekenresultaten RBMII berekeningen Bijlage 5 aandeel LNG in GF3 binnenvaart Bijlage 6 aandeel LNG in GF3 zeevaart RWS INFORMATIE | Monitoringsrapportage water 2018 | 20 mei 2019 1 Inleiding 1.1 Algemeen Op basis van artikel 15 van de Wet vervoer gevaarlijke stoffen en de artikelen 9 tot en met 12 van de Regeling Basisnet is de Minister verplicht om te onderzoeken in hoeverre één of meer van de in de Regeling Basisnet opgenomen risicoplafonds worden overschreden. De Regeling Basisnet is per 1 april 2015 in werking getreden. Deze rapportage bevat de resultaten van de toetsing van de realisatiecijfers van het vervoer gevaarlijke stoffen over het water aan de risicoplafonds Basisnet over het jaar 2018. De verscheidenheid aan vervoerde stoffen over de transportroutes is zo groot, dat een risicoanalyse per stof zeer arbeidsintensief zal zijn.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentatie Bor Waal Merwede
    Bouwsteen Beeld op de Rivieren 24 november 2020 – Bouwdag Rijn 1 Ontwikkelperspectief Waal Merwede 24 november 2020 – Bouwdag Rijn 1 Ontwikkelperspectief Waal Merwede Trajecten Waal Merwede • Midden-Waal (Nijmegen - Tiel) • Beneden-Waal (Tiel - Woudrichem) • Boven-Merwede (Woudrichem – Werkendam) Wat bespreken we? • Oogst gezamenlijke werksessies • Richtinggevend perspectief gebruiksfuncties rivierengebied • Lange termijn (2050 en verder) • Strategische keuzen Hoe lees je de kaart? • Bekijk de kaart via de GIS viewer • Toekomstige gebruiksfuncties zijn met kleur aangegeven • Kansen en opgaven met * aangeduid, verbindingen met een pijl • Keuzes en dilemma’s weergegeven met icoontje Synthese Rijn Waterbeschikbaarheid • Belangrijkste strategische keuze: waterverdeling splitsingspunt. • Meer water via IJssel naar IJsselmeer in tijden van hoogwater (aanvullen buffer IJsselmeer) • Verplaatsen innamepunten Lek voor zoetwater wenselijk i.v.m. verzilting • Afbouwen drainage in buitendijkse gebieden i.v.m. langer vasthouden van water. Creëren van waterbuffers in bovenstroomse deel van het Nederlandse Rijnsysteem. (balans • droge/natte periodes). Natuur • Noodzakelijk om robuuste natuureenheden te realiseren • Splitsingspunt is belangrijke ecologische knooppunt. • Uiterwaarden Waal geschikt voor dynamische grootschalige natuur. Landbouw • Nederrijn + IJssel: mengvorm van landbouw en natuur mogelijk. Waterveiligheid • Tot 2050 zijn dijkversterkingen afdoende -> daarna meer richten op rivierverruiming. Meer water via IJssel betekent vergroten waterveiligheidsopgave
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Planning Key Decision Room for the River English.Pdf
    SPATIAL PLANNING KEY DECISION ~ ROOM FOR THE RIVer Explanatory Memorandum 8 Waal (from Nijmegen to Gorinchem) 44 Contents of Explanatory Memorandum 8.1 Description of the area 44 8.2 Flood protection 44 8.3 Improvements in spatial quality 44 8.4 Overall approach to decisions for the long term 45 8.5 Short-term measures 45 8.6 Reserving land 46 Explanation 8.7 Opportunities for other measures 46 1 Introduction 9 9 Lower reaches of the rivers 48 1.1 Background 9 9.1 Description of the area 48 1.2 Procedure since publication of PKB Part 1 9 9.2 Flood protection 48 1.3 Decision-making 10 9.3 Improvements in spatial quality 49 1.4 Substantive changes compared to PKB Part 1 10 9.4 Overall approach to decisions for the long term 49 1.5 Substantive changes compared to PKB Part 3 11 9.5 Short-term measures 50 1.6 Guide to this publication 11 9.6 Reserving land 53 9.7 Opportunities for measures 53 2 Major shift in approach to flood protection 12 2.1 The background to this PKB 12 10 Lower Rhine/Lek 54 2.2 Major shift in approach 12 10.1 Introduction 54 2.3 Coordination with improvements in spatial quality 15 10.2 Flood protection 54 10.3 Improvements in spatial quality 54 3 Flood protection in the Rivers Region 16 10.4 Overall approach to decisions for the long term 55 3.1 The challenge for the PKB 16 10.5 Short-term measures 55 3.2 Long-term trends in river discharge levels and sea level 16 10.6 Reserving land 58 3.3 Targets to be met 18 10.7 Opportunities for measures 58 4 Improvements in spatial quality 25 11 IJssel 60 4.1 Introduction 25 11.1
    [Show full text]
  • Acipenser Sturio L., 1758) in the Lower Rhine River, As Revealed by Telemetry Niels W
    Outmigration Pathways of Stocked Juvenile European Sturgeon (Acipenser Sturio L., 1758) in the Lower Rhine River, as Revealed by Telemetry Niels W. P. Brevé, Hendry Vis, Bram Houben, André Breukelaar, Marie-Laure Acolas To cite this version: Niels W. P. Brevé, Hendry Vis, Bram Houben, André Breukelaar, Marie-Laure Acolas. Outmigration Pathways of Stocked Juvenile European Sturgeon (Acipenser Sturio L., 1758) in the Lower Rhine River, as Revealed by Telemetry. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, Wiley, 2019, 35 (1), pp.61-68. 10.1111/jai.13815. hal-02267361 HAL Id: hal-02267361 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02267361 Submitted on 19 Aug 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Received: 5 December 2017 | Revised: 26 April 2018 | Accepted: 17 September 2018 DOI: 10.1111/jai.13815 STURGEON PAPER Outmigration pathways of stocked juvenile European sturgeon (Acipenser sturio L., 1758) in the Lower Rhine River, as revealed by telemetry Niels W. P. Brevé1 | Hendry Vis2 | Bram Houben3 | André Breukelaar4 | Marie‐Laure Acolas5 1Koninklijke Sportvisserij Nederland, Bilthoven, Netherlands Abstract 2VisAdvies BV, Nieuwegein, Netherlands Working towards a future Rhine Sturgeon Action Plan the outmigration pathways of 3ARK Nature, Nijmegen, Netherlands stocked juvenile European sturgeon (Acipenser sturio L., 1758) were studied in the 4Rijkswaterstaat (RWS), Rotterdam, River Rhine in 2012 and 2015 using the NEDAP Trail system.
    [Show full text]
  • Armies and Ecosystems in Premodern Europe: the Meuse Region, 1250–1850
    WCP ARMIES AND ECOSYSTEMS IN PREMODERN EUROPE THE MEUSE REGION, 1250–1850 Using the ecosystem concept as his starting point, the author examines the complex relationship between premodern armed forces and their environ- and Conflict in War ment at three levels: landscapes, living beings, and diseases. The study focuses Societies Premodern on Europe’s Meuse Region, well-known among historians of war as a battle- ground between France and Germany. By analyzing soldiers’ long-term inter- actions with nature, this book engages with current debates about the eco- ARMIES AND ECOSYSTEMS IN PREMODERN EUROPE IN PREMODERN logical impact of the military, and provides new impetus for contemporary armed forces to make greater effort to reduce their environmental footprint. “This is an impressive interdisciplinary study, contributing to environmental history, the history of war and historical geography. The book advances an original and intriguing argument that armed forces have had a vested interest in preserving the environments and habitats in which they operate, and have thus contributed to envi- ronmental conservation long before this became a popular cause of wider humanity. The work will provide a template for how this topic can be researched for other parts of the world or for other time periods.” Peter H. Wilson, Chichele Professor of the History of War, University of Oxford War and Confl ict in Premodern Societies is a pioneering series that moves away from strategies, battles, and chronicle histories in order to provide a home for work that places warfare in broader contexts, and contributes new insights ARMIES AND ECOSYSTEMS on everyday experiences of confl ict and violence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology O F the Estuaries of Rhine, Meuse and Scheldt in The
    TOPICS IN MARINE BIOLOGY. ROS. J. D. (ED.). SCIENT. MAR . 53(2-3): 457-463 1989 The ecology of the estuaries of Rhine, Meuse and Scheldt in the Netherlands* CARLO HEIP Delta Institute for Hydrobiological Research. Yerseke. The Netherlands SUMMARY: Three rivers, the Rhine, the Meuse and the Scheldt enter the North Sea close to each other in the Netherlands, where they form the so-called delta region. This area has been under constant human influence since the Middle Ages, but especially after a catastrophic flood in 1953, when very important coastal engineering projects changed the estuarine character of the area drastically. Freshwater, brackish water and marine lakes were formed and in one of the sea arms, the Eastern Scheldt, a storm surge barrier was constructed. Only the Western Scheldt remained a true estuary. The consecutive changes in this area have been extensively monitored and an important research effort was devoted to evaluate their ecological consequences. A summary and synthesis of some of these results are presented. In particular, the stagnant marine lake Grevelingen and the consequences of the storm surge barrier in the Eastern Scheldt have received much attention. In lake Grevelingen the principal aim of the study was to develop a nitrogen model. After the lake was formed the residence time of the water increased from a few days to several years. Primary production increased and the sediments were redistributed but the primary consumers suchs as the blue mussel and cockles survived. A remarkable increase ofZostera marina beds and the snail Nassarius reticulatus was observed. The storm surge barrier in the Eastern Scheldt was just finished in 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Transport Fluvial En France Et En Europe
    l a n a k k c e b ü L Ems Jade k. - e . b Elbe W l Starkenborgh Ems Emden E tz Harinxmak kanaal ri ü M Oldenburg Elbe Pr. Margriet Ems Wittenberge sur et www.vnf.fr et Rathenow #adoptezleTransportfluvial localisation des écluses. des localisation la consultation des horaires de navigation et des avis à la batellerie et la la et batellerie la à avis des et navigation de horaires des consultation la en compte des contraintes (gabarit, avis à la batellerie, horaires de navigation), de horaires batellerie, la à avis (gabarit, contraintes des compte en LÉGENDE Gratuit et accessible à tous, cet outil permet un calcul d’itinéraire avec prise prise avec d’itinéraire calcul un permet outil cet tous, à accessible et Gratuit Elbe-Havelkanal Le calcul d’itinéraire fluvial d’itinéraire calcul Le Magdeburg Principaux ports publics de plus de 300 000 tonnes accessible aux opérateurs et au grand public. grand au et opérateurs aux accessible Accès ferroviaire réalisés par les impacts du transport sur la société (les coûts externes). EVE est est EVE externes). coûts (les société la sur transport du impacts les par réalisés ou multimodal fleuve-route. Son originalité réside dans l’indication des gains gains des l’indication dans réside originalité Son fleuve-route. multimodal ou Aken GRANDE-BRETAGNE Maas Axe fluvio-maritime Maas 2 MER DU NORD Saale de transport engendrées pour un trajet routier routier trajet un pour engendrées transport de Il compare les émissions de CO de émissions les compare Il EVE, l’Ecocalculateur de la Voie d’Eau Voie la de l’Ecocalculateur EVE, PAYS-BAS Ville A1 – Côte d’Azur, ADEME et Ministère de la Transition Energétique et solidaire.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithological Control on Scour Hole Formation in the Rhine-Meuse Estuary
    Delft University of Technology Lithological control on scour hole formation in the Rhine-Meuse Estuary Huismans, Ymkje; Koopmans, Hilde; Wiersma, Ane; de Haas, Tjalling; Berends, Koen; Sloff, Kees; Stouthamer, Esther DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107720 Publication date 2021 Document Version Final published version Published in Geomorphology Citation (APA) Huismans, Y., Koopmans, H., Wiersma, A., de Haas, T., Berends, K., Sloff, K., & Stouthamer, E. (2021). Lithological control on scour hole formation in the Rhine-Meuse Estuary. Geomorphology, 385, 1-15. [107720]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107720 Important note To cite this publication, please use the final published version (if applicable). Please check the document version above. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons. Takedown policy Please contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights. We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. This work is downloaded from Delft University of Technology. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to a maximum of 10. Geomorphology 385 (2021) 107720 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph Lithological control on scour hole formation in the Rhine-Meuse Estuary Ymkje Huismans a,b,⁎, Hilde Koopmans a,b, Ane Wiersma a, Tjalling de Haas c,KoenBerendsa, Kees Sloff a,b, Esther Stouthamer c a Deltares, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • National Strategy on Spatial Planning and the Environment a Sustainable Perspective for Our Living Environment
    National Strategy on Spatial Planning and the Environment A sustainable perspective for our living environment Draft National Strategy on Spatial Planning and the Environment | 1 2 | Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations Table of contents Summary 4 1. About the National Strategy on Spatial Planning and the Environment 9 1.1 A sense of urgency; a perspective for the Netherlands 9 1.2 New vision, new approach 10 1.3 A different view, different choices 11 1.4 Scope and positioning 12 1.5 Cooperation and practical implementation 13 1.6 Development 14 1.7 Structure of the NOVI 16 2. Future perspective 19 2.1 A climate-resilient delta 22 2.2 Sustainable, competitive and circular 24 2.3 Quality of life in towns, cities and urban regions 27 2.4 Proximity and reliable connections 30 2.5 Healthy and safe, recognisable and natural 33 2.6 Looking forward to 2050 37 3. National interests and tasks in the physical living environment 45 3.1 Relevance of national interests 45 3.2 National interests and tasks 46 3.3 National Main Structure for the Living Environment 65 3.4 From tasks to priorities 68 4. Directing priorities 71 4.1 Environment-inclusive policy: consideration principles 71 4.2 From priorities to policy choices 76 4.2.1 Priority 1 Space for climate adaptation and energy transition 76 4.2.2 Priority 2 Sustainable economic growth potential 90 4.2.3 Priority 3 Strong and healthy cities and regions 108 4.2.4 Priority 4 Futureproof development of rural areas 135 5.
    [Show full text]
  • C084.08 Rapport Houting Ijsselmeer-Uitgestorven Vis Terug
    Houting in het IJsselmeergebied. Een uitgestorven vis terug? H.V. Winter, J.J. de Leeuw & J. Bosveld Rapport nummer C084/08 Vestiging IJmuiden Opdrachtgever: B.J. de Witte, A.W. Breukelaar Rijkswaterstaat Dienst IJsselmeergebied en Rijkswaterstaat Waterdienst Postbus 600 8200AP Lelystad Publicatiedatum: November 2008 Rapportnummer C084/08 1 van31 • Wageningen IMARES levert kennis die nodig is voor het duurzaam beschermen, oogsten en ruimte gebruik van zeeĉ en zilte kustgebieden (Marine Living Resource Management). • Wageningen IMARES is daarin de kennispartner voor overheden, bedrijfsleven en maatschappelijke organisaties voor wie marine living resources van belang zijn. • Wageningen IMARES doet daarvoor strategisch en toegepast ecologisch onderzoek in perspectief van ecologische en economische ontwikkelingen. © 2007Wageningen IMARES Wageningen IMARES is een samenwerkingsĉ De Directie van Wageningen IMARES is niet aansprakelijk voor gevolgschade, noch verband tussen Wageningen UR en TNO. voor schade welke voortvloeit uit toepassingen van de resultaten van Wij zijn geregistreerd in het Handelsregister werkzaamheden of andere gegevens verkregen van Wageningen IMARES; Amsterdam nr. 34135929, opdrachtgever vrijwaart Wageningen IMARES van aanspraken van derden in BTW nr. NL 811383696B04. verband met deze toepassing. Dit rapport is vervaardigd op verzoek van de opdrachtgever hierboven aangegeven en is zijn eigendom. Niets uit dit rapport mag weergegeven en/of gepubliceerd worden, gefotokopieerd of op enige andere manier gebruikt worden zonder
    [Show full text]
  • MIT Verkenning Vaarwegsplitsing Dordtsche Kil - Hollandsch Diep
    Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat opq MIT Verkenning vaarwegsplitsing Dordtsche Kil - Hollandsch Diep Eindrapport Februari 2006 Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat opq MIT Verkenning vaarwegsplitsing Dordtsche Kil - Hollandsch Diep Eindrapport Februari 2006 . Colofon Uitgegeven door: Rijkswaterstaat Dienst Zuid-Holland Informatie: Telefoon: 010-4026314 Fax: Uitgevoerd door: Drs. O.C. Koedijk Opmaak: Datum: Februari 2006 Status: Definitief Versienummer: 2 3 MIT Verkenning vaarwegsplitsing Dortsche Kil - Hollandsch Diep Inhoudsopgave . 1. Inleiding 7 2. Aanleiding 8 2.1 Achtergrond 8 2.2 Historisch overzicht 8 2.3 Motivatie 9 3. Opdracht en uitleg 11 4. Aanpak en verantwoording 12 4.1 Inleiding 12 4.2 Probleemanalyse 12 4.3 Verkeersintensiteit, samenstelling en ontwikkeling 12 4.4 Vaarweg lay out en omgeving vaarweg 13 4.5 Hydrologische en meteorologische gegevens 13 4.6 Bestuurlijke aspecten en stakeholders 13 4.7 Verkeersafwikkeling en simulatie 13 5. Leeswijzer 14 6. Probleemanalyse 15 6.1 Inleiding 15 6.2 Probleemomschrijving 15 6.3 Afbakening studiegebied 16 6.4 Analyse relevante partijen 17 7. Vaarweg lay-out en omgeving vaarwegsplitsing 19 7.1 Inleiding 19 7.2 Samenstellende vaargeulen 19 7.2.1. Hollandsch Diep 19 7.2.2. Dordtsche Kil 19 7.2.3. Zuid-Hollandsch Diep 19 7.3 Visuele vensters 20 8. Hydrologie en meteorologie 21 8.1 Inleiding 21 8.2 Hydraulische informatie 21 8.2.1. Inleiding 21 8.2.2. Waterstanden 21 8.2.3. Stroomsnelheden en -richtingen 22 8.2.4. Golfhoogten 22 8.3 Meteorologie 24 8.3.1. Inleiding 24 8.3.2. Windsnelheden en windrichtingen 24 8.3.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Uittrekmogelijkheden Voor Schieraal Via De Haringvlietsluizen
    De uittrekmogelijkheden voor schieraal via de haringvlietsluizen Dr. H.V. Winter & Dr. S.M. Bierman Rapport C155/10 IMARES Wageningen UR (IMARES - Institute for Marine Resources & Ecosystem Studies) Opdrachtgever: Ministerie van EL&I Directie AKV Postbus 20401 2500 EK DEN HAAG BAS code BO12-04 Publicatiedatum: 10 december 2010 IMARES is: • een onafhankelijk, objectief en gezaghebbend instituut dat kennis levert die noodzakelijk is voor integrale duurzame bescherming, exploitatie en ruimtelijk gebruik van de zee en kustzones; • een instituut dat de benodigde kennis levert voor een geïntegreerde duurzame bescherming, exploitatie en ruimtelijk gebruik van zee en kustzones; • een belangrijke, proactieve speler in nationale en internationale mariene onderzoeksnetwerken (zoals ICES en EFARO). P.O. Box 68 P.O. Box 77 P.O. Box 57 P.O. Box 167 1970 AB IJmuiden 4400 AB Yerseke 1780 AB Den Helder 1790 AD Den Burg Texel Phone: +31 (0)317 48 09 00 Phone: +31 (0)317 48 09 00 Phone: +31 (0)317 48 09 00 Phone: +31 (0)317 48 09 00 Fax: +31 (0)317 48 73 26 Fax: +31 (0)317 48 73 59 Fax: +31 (0)223 63 06 87 Fax: +31 (0)317 48 73 62 E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] www.imares.wur.nl www.imares.wur.nl www.imares.wur.nl www.imares.wur.nl © 2010 IMARES Wageningen UR IMARES is onderdeel van Stichting DLO De Directie van IMARES is niet aansprakelijk voor gevolgschade, KvK nr. 09098104, noch voor schade welke voortvloeit uit toepassingen van de IMARES BTW nr.
    [Show full text]