DOCSLIB.ORG

James Street Boost Station Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
James Street Boost Station Environmental Assessment Appendix A Archaeological Assessment (Stages 1 & 2) ADAMS HERITAGE 3783 Maple Crest Court, RR#1 Inverary, Ontario K0H 1X0 Phone (613) 353 1463 Fax (613) 353 1463 email: [email protected] (Original Report) An Archaeological Assessment (Stages 1 & 2) of the proposed expansion of the James Street Pump Station Utilities Kingston East Water Systems EA Military Reserve (Geographic Township of Pittsburgh) City of Kingston conducted for CH2M HILL Canada Ltd. contact: Marcelle (Marcy) Jordan, P.Eng. 1101 Prince of Wales Drive, Suite 330, Ottawa, ON K2C 3W7 Canada 613.723.8700 ext. 73116 [email protected] on behalf of Utilities Kingston by Nicholas R. Adams Archaeological Licence P003 P003-0394-2013 related pifs: PIF# P003-343-2012, PIF # P003-328-2011, P003-315-2011 December 30, 2013 Approval Authority: City of Kingston Contact: Shirley Bailey Planning and Development Department, Sustainability and Growth, City of Kingston 216 Ontario Street, Kingston ON K7L 2Z3 Tel: 613-546-4291 ext. 2176 Fax: 613-542-9965 Email: [email protected] Regulatory Process: Environmental Assessment Act “I the undersigned hereby declare that, to the best of my knowledge, the information in this report and submitted in support of this report is complete and accurate in every way, and I am aware of the penalties against providing false information under section 69 of the Ontario Heritage Act.” An Archaeological Assessment (Stages 1 & 2) of the proposed expansion of the James Street Pump Station Utilities Kingston East Water Systems EA Military Reserve (Geographic Township of Pittsburgh) City of Kingston by Nicholas R. Adams Archaeological Licence P003 P003-0394-2013 related pifs: PIF# P003-343-2012, PIF # P003-328-2011, P003-315-2011 December 30, 2013 Report type: Original Regulatory process: Environmental Assessment Act ADAMS HERITAGE 3783 Maple Crest Court Inverary, Ontario K0H 1X0 613 353 1463 [email protected] Appendix C Heritage Impact Assessment HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT ­ James Street Booster Station, 213 James St., Kingston Revised and re-submitted to CH2M HILL Canada Ltd. – 7 April 2014 Laurie Smith Heritage Consulting 4 Bullock Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 1G8 � Tel. (613) 236-8582 Cel. (613) 863-8852 � [email protected] � Heritage Impact Assessment - James Street Booster Station 2 Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 2 � 2.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4 � 3.0 Relevant Policy Provisions ........................................................................................................... 4 � 4.0 Methodology and Qualifications .................................................................................................... 6 � 5.0 Description of the Project ............................................................................................................. 7 � 6.0 Heritage Designations Potentially Impacted .................................................................................. 7 � 7.0 Cultural Heritage Evaluation of James Street Booster Station ....................................................... 9 � 8.0 Cultural Heritage Value of Barriefield HCD ................................................................................. 10 � 9.0 Conservation Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................ 12 � 10.0 Stakeholder Consultation ........................................................................................................... 14 � 11.0 Potential Impacts on Heritage Value ........................................................................................... 15 � 12.0 Recommended Mitigation ........................................................................................................... 16 � 13.0 Recommended Policy Measures and Next Steps ....................................................................... 17 � 14.0 Figures ...................................................................................................................................... 18 � 15.0 Appendix A – Statement of Cultural Heritage Value .................................................................... 28 � 16.0 Appendix B – City of Kingston Official Plan, s7.3.C.7 .................................................................. 30 � 17.0 Appendix C – Evaluation of James Street Booster Station against O. Reg. 9/06, OHA ................ 31 � 1.0Executive Summary This report is a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) of the James Street Booster Station, a water pumping station located within the Barriefield Heritage Conservation District (HCD) and close to the Rideau Canal National Historic Site/World Heritage Site in the east end of Kingston. The station was built in 1956 and refurbished in 1991. As part of updating the 2007 Drinking Water Master Plan, Utilities Kingston retained CH2M HILL Canada Ltd. (CH2M HILL) to assisting in completing a Schedule B, Class Environmental Assessment to study current and future needs of the booster station. This HIA is being prepared as part of the Environmental Screening Report, in order to address potential impacts on cultural heritage resources. The preferred alternative proposes that the existing building remain in its current location, that a new building be constructed as an addition to, or immediately adjacent to the existing building, and that the 1991 addition will likely be removed. The existing setback will be maintained and the new building will extend to the rear/south of the existing building, with a possible east or west projection. The new building is expected to be similar in size and height to the existing building. Heritage designations in the vicinity of the booster station include the Barriefield HCD, the Rideau Canal NHS/WHS) and three other national historic sites. As well, the City of Kingston Official Plan identifies certain views in this area that are protected by the policies set out in that document. Only the Barriefield HCD will potentially be impacted by the proposed project. The key potential for impact is the design of the new station and the extent to which it achieves compatibility with the heritage character of the district. The following measures are recommended to mitigate potential negative impacts: The new addition/building should be compatible with the existing building and with properties on the north side of James Street, and should utilize traditional building forms and proportions. Laurie Smith Heritage Consulting ▪ 4 Bullock Ave, Ottawa K1S 1G8 ▪ 613-236-8582 ▪ [email protected] Heritage Impact Assessment - James Street Booster Station 3 The new addition/building should have a low- or medium-pitch roof, clad in black or grey asphalt shingles, cedar shingles or metal, and roof vents, solar panels, skylights and dormers should be located at the rear. Windows should use vertical and rectangular proportions. Clapboard, limestone and white or grey stucco are preferred for wall cladding (in that order) but plain, red-clay, Ontario-sized brick is also possible. The size of the surface parking pad should be minimized, and soft landscaping should be installed around the booster station and between the parking area and James Street, using plants identified in the HCD Plan. If construction will involve excavation, pre-construction surveys of adjacent buildings should be undertaken. Less-intrusive, mechanical methods should be used for any rock removal, and any damage to buildings or structures older than 40 years should be assessed by a qualified heritage professional. Staging areas should be placed to minimize damage to trees, hedgerows, fences and stone walls, and should be restored to their pre-construction condition following construction. If necessary, James Street should be restored, following construction, to its existing alignment, elevation, width and materials, with gravel shoulder and grassed boulevard, and without sidewalks and curbs. The following policy measures are recommended: Detail design should incorporate and address the mitigation measures set out above. The architectural and engineering team should include qualified heritage professionals with recent, relevant experience working with built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes. Utilities Kingston will require a heritage permit for this project, obtained through the Heritage & Urban Design section of the Planning & Development Department, and with the consent of the Municipal Heritage Committee and Council. The Heritage & Urban Design section recommends that a scope HIA be prepared with respect to the preferred design. A pre-consultation at the detail design stage is advisable. Parks Canada should be circulated on the project as it progresses. Laurie Smith Heritage Consulting ▪ 4 Bullock Ave, Ottawa K1S 1G8 ▪ 613-236-8582 ▪ [email protected] Heritage Impact Assessment - James Street Booster Station 4 2.0Introduction CH2M HILL retained Laurie Smith of Laurie Smith Heritage Consulting to prepare a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA)1 for built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes, for the rehabilitation of the James Street Booster Station, a project being proposed by Utilities Kingston. The James Street Booster Station pumps drinking water to supply the Kingston East Water System. It is a small, one-storey building
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fort Henry National Historic Site of Canada
    © Copyright Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Chief Executive Officer of Parks Canada, 2006 Government of Canada Catalogue No. R64-105/41-2006E ISBN: 0-662-44230-X Aussi disponible en français. Fort Henry national historic site of canada Management Plan February, 2007 FORT HENRY NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE OF CANADA Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction . .1 1.1 Purpose of a Management Plan . .1 1.2 Preparation of this Management Plan . .1 1.3 Legislative and Policy Context for Management Planning . .2 1.4 Brief History of the Site . .3 1.5 Administered Place . .4 1.6 Local and Regional Context . .4 2.0 The Role of Fort Henry in the Family of National Historic Sites . .6 2.1 Role of Fort Henry in the National Historic Sites System . .6 3.0 Commemorative Integrity . .8 3.1 Concept of Commemorative Integrity . .8 3.2 The Commemorative Integrity Statement for Fort Henry . .8 3.3 Statement of Commemorative Intent . .8 4.0 Current Situation Analysis . .10 4.1 Cultural Resources . .10 4.1.1 Built Heritage . .10 4.1.2 Archaeological Sites . .12 4.1.3 Collections . .13 4.1.4 The Cultural Landscape . .13 4.2 The Presentation of Messages at Fort Henry . .15 4.2.1 Heritage Presentation Programming at Fort Henry . .16 4.3 Natural Resources at Fort Henry . .17 4.4 Visitor Use and Operations . .17 5.0 Vision for Fort Henry . .18 5.1. Context of a Site Vision . .18 5.2 Vision for Fort Henry National Historic Site in 2021 .
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Rideau Canal World Heritage Site Management Plan
    2005 Foreword The Rideau Canal bears witness to 19th century engineering excellence, most notably through its ingenious adaptive design and brilliant execution. As well as being a technological feat, it provides an eloquent illustration of the defence measures taken by the British Empire in Canada in the early 1800s, which resulted in the transformation of Canada’s eastern Ontario hinterland into a transportation route whose integrity has, to this day, been maintained at an exceptionally high level. This linear serial nomination incorporates six elements that together will become the Rideau Canal World Heritage Site. These are: the Rideau Canal National Historic Site of Canada, Fort Henry National Historic Site of Canada, Fort Frederick, Cathcart Tower, Shoal Tower and Murney Tower (the Kingston Fortifications National Historic Site of Canada). This management plan specifies how the world heritage values of the nominated property will be protected for present and future generations. It constitutes the formal commitment of the Parks Canada Agency, the responsible Canadian management organization, to the conservation and protection of the property. It identifies the world heritage values that will be protected, the legislative and policy framework for management of the property, the elements of the management system in place to protect the property, and mechanisms for monitoring and periodic reporting. As a high-level, overarching management plan, this document unites the specific operational plans for the six elements by identifying and elaborating management commitments and actions that will result in an integrated approach to administering the world heritage site. I am very grateful to our dedicated team from Parks Canada, the World Heritage Site steering committee and to all of the local organizations and individuals who have demonstrated good will, hard work, spirit of cooperation and extraordinary sense of stewardship.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Martello Towers Author(S): Willard B
    North American Martello Towers Author(s): Willard B. Robinson Source: Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 33, No. 2 (May, 1974), pp. 158-164 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the Society of Architectural Historians Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/988909 . Accessed: 01/08/2013 20:57 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press and Society of Architectural Historians are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 132.206.27.24 on Thu, 1 Aug 2013 20:57:31 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 158 North American Martello Towers As with all architecturefor defense,once the effectiveness of the basic configuration was proven, the defense was WILLARD B. ROBINSON formulated; only minor changes were thereafter made, either to improve efficiencyor to adaptto a particularsite. The Museum, Texas Tech University Circular or elliptical in plan, most Martello towers had diametersof thirty or more feet-in additionto being very HISTORICALLY, military architecturehas been noted for strong, curved forms enclosed a large amount of area per its beauty and logic.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Cities of Romance
    CANADIAN CITI E S of R O MAN C E By K A T H E R I N E A L E H “ M R S H N R V I ' . J O G A N ) N “ ” “ ’ A U T H O R O F Gr e K n ittin The Wiz z te y g , ’ ” Comm ue etc . , D O R O T H Y S T E V E N S P U B L I S H E D a t T O R O N T O by M c c L E L L A N D an d S T E W A R T COPYR I LIMITE D TORONTO C A N A D I A N C I T I E S o f R O M A N C E These sketches call attention to aphase of Canadian history largely unregarded , the romantic background of many of our towns and cities . The writer has not t described every romantic ci y of Canada , nor does this claim to be a modern guide book . The portrayals are unique , not only because of the vivid impressions of one a a who is poet as well as prose writer of distinction , but on account of the association established between certain authors and certain places . The volume is there a a . fore liter ry sketch book , as well as a book of cities E BL R TH P U ISH E . So many of my friends , from one end of Canada to the t other, have helped me in the matter of hese stories that thei r names would make a substantial addition to this book .
    [Show full text]
  • National Historic Sites of Canada System Plan Will Provide Even Greater Opportunities for Canadians to Understand and Celebrate Our National Heritage
    PROUDLY BRINGING YOU CANADA AT ITS BEST National Historic Sites of Canada S YSTEM P LAN Parks Parcs Canada Canada 2 6 5 Identification of images on the front cover photo montage: 1 1. Lower Fort Garry 4 2. Inuksuk 3. Portia White 3 4. John McCrae 5. Jeanne Mance 6. Old Town Lunenburg © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, (2000) ISBN: 0-662-29189-1 Cat: R64-234/2000E Cette publication est aussi disponible en français www.parkscanada.pch.gc.ca National Historic Sites of Canada S YSTEM P LAN Foreword Canadians take great pride in the people, places and events that shape our history and identify our country. We are inspired by the bravery of our soldiers at Normandy and moved by the words of John McCrae’s "In Flanders Fields." We are amazed at the vision of Louis-Joseph Papineau and Sir Wilfrid Laurier. We are enchanted by the paintings of Emily Carr and the writings of Lucy Maud Montgomery. We look back in awe at the wisdom of Sir John A. Macdonald and Sir George-Étienne Cartier. We are moved to tears of joy by the humour of Stephen Leacock and tears of gratitude for the courage of Tecumseh. We hold in high regard the determination of Emily Murphy and Rev. Josiah Henson to overcome obstacles which stood in the way of their dreams. We give thanks for the work of the Victorian Order of Nurses and those who organ- ized the Underground Railroad. We think of those who suffered and died at Grosse Île in the dream of reaching a new home.
    [Show full text]
  • Limelight Newsletter of the Kingston Historical Society
    Limelight Newsletter of the Kingston Historical Society Kingston Ontario Canada The Kingston Historical Society grate- fully acknowledges the financial support of the Volume 23 no 2 ISSN 1488-5565 February 2021 Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport. KHS Meeting Wednesday, February 17, 2021@7:00 pm via Zoom Presenter: Victoria Cosby as part of the Society’s celebration of Heritage Month in Kingston “Kingston through Her Eyes: Harriett Dobbs Cartwright and Her Adopted Home” Harriett Dobbs Cartwright emigrated from Dublin. Ireland to Upper Canada upon her marriage to Anglican minister Robert David Cartwright in 1832. Her voluminous correspondence chronicles her active engage- ment in the local affairs of her new ‘home’ in the colony of Upper Canada: as a wife, as a mother, and as a social activist. Cartwright played an incredibly important role in Kingston’s upper class community. She vol- unteered in the Female Benevolent Society and Orphans’ and Widows’ Friend Society, through which she contributed to the establishment of such major Kingston institutions as Kingston General Hospital, St. George’s Anglican Church, the Kingston Penitentiary, and Rockwood Asylum for the Insane. Harriett Dobbs Cartwright’s contributions to the community have had a lasting impact on the city of Kingston as we know it today. Victoria Cosby is a fourth year doctoral student in the Queen’s History Department. Her research interests include nineteenth- century Canadian women, the British World, as well as gender and sexuality studies. She is currently working on a biography of Harriett Dobbs Cartwright. Wednesday, Feb 24, 7 pm Another February Meeting!! The KHS Annual General Meeting over Zoom Notice / link will be sent out.
    [Show full text]
  • The Involvement of Business Improvement Areas in Tourism: An
    The Involvement of Business Improvement Areas in Tourism: An Exploratory Study of Ontario BIAs by Andrew Marc Giraldi A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Environmental Studies in Geography - Tourism Policy and Planning Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2009 ©Andrew Marc Giraldi 2009 Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-56050-1 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-56050-1 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE April 4, 2012 at 6:00 P.M
    AGENDA HERITAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE April 4, 2012 at 6:00 p.m. River Plate Room, Town Hall Meeting No.4 Online Agenda: Anything in blue denotes an attachment/link. By clicking the links on the agenda page, you can jump directly to that section of the agenda. To manoeuver back to the agenda page use the Ctrl + Home keys simultaneously OR use the “Bookmark” icon on the navigation panel to the left of your screen. 1. Call to Order 2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest 3. Approval of Minutes 3.1 February 29, 2012 ......................................................................................................... Page 1 4. Presentation/Discussion Items 4.1 Cougs (Workmans Circle) Ltd Site Plan (SP4/12) (6:05 - 6:20 p.m.) .......................... Page 9 4.2 Part IV Designation for 2012 (6:20 - 6:25 p.m.) 4.3 Memorial Park Gates By-law / Historical Plaque Wording (6:25 - 6:40 p.m.) .......... Page 12 4.4 JAMFest (6:40 - 6:50 p.m.) .......................................................................................... Page 16 4.5 2012 Ontario Heritage Conference: May 31 – June 3 (6:50 - 7:00 p.m.) ................... Page 17 5. Standing Items 5.1 Work Plan .................................................................................................................... Page 63 5.2 Heritage Register Evaluation (Ontario Reg. 9/06) (7:00 - 7:30 p.m.) ........................ Page 66 419 Kingston Road West (p. 38 of Photographic Inventory) 13 - 15 Church Street South (p. 39) 87 Church Street South (p. 41) 59 Old Kingston Road (p. 44) 15 Elizabeth Street (p. 46) 545 Kingston Road West (p. 49) 97 Church Street South (p. 50) 19 Elizabeth Street (p. 51) 71 Old Kingston Road (p. 55) 582 Kingston Road West (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Henry National Historic Site's Top Twenty Facts
    FORT HENRY NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE'S TOP TWENTY FACTS 1: THE REASON THE FORT IS CALLED FORT HENRY IS... The peninsula on which Fort Henry is built is called Point Henry, named after Henry Hamilton, 1st Lieutenant Governor of Quebec, 1782-85. 2: THE FORT WE WORK IN TODAY IS NOT THE ORIGINAL FORT BECAUSE... The Fort today is the 2nd Fort Henry. The 1st was originally built in 1813. It was dismantled when the 2nd fort was built from 1832-37. 3: THE ENEMY THE FORT WAS TO DEFEND AGAINST WAS... Throughout most of the 1800's, the United States. 4: THE PURPOSE OF FORT HENRY WAS... To defend the terminus of the Rideau Canal and the Royal Naval Dockyards. Please refer to the Fort Henry Commemorative Integrity Statement (CIS), for more information. 5: WHY FORT HENRY NEEDED RESTORATION IN THE 1930's ... The Fort was taken out of service in 1891, after which it fell into disrepair. It was rebuilt from 1936-38 and on August 1st, 1938, Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King opened the Fort as a museum and historic site. 6: TODAY THE FORT IS... A living museum- our interpretive staff portrays life in the year of 1867 for the soldiers and their families who were in garrison here. (In garrison means they were stationed at the Fort.) As well, we offer our visitors shopping and dining, host special events and we keep our site clean and well preserved. 7: THE FORT WAS USED AS A PRISONER OF WAR CAMP/INTERNMENT CAMP IN... the 1837 Rebellions, during World War I, 1914-18, and during World War II, 1939-45.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..188 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 15.00)
    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 146 Ï NUMBER 184 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, November 23, 2012 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 12371 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, November 23, 2012 The House met at 10 a.m. gets passed, and the kinds of supports offered to tribal councils, in particular, and first nations governments in terms of reporting? Mrs. Carol Hughes: Mr. Speaker, I know my colleague from Prayers Nanaimo—Cowichan is a very hard worker and understands the first nations issues. GOVERNMENT ORDERS If the bill does pass, there will be a major impact on our first nations with those cuts. It will impact on the ability of first nations to Ï (1005) comply with the legislation that the government is putting forward. [English] I just received a copy of a newsletter from one of my first nations FIRST NATIONS FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY ACT indicating that “The Resound is now going into its 11th year of The House resumed from November 20 consideration of Bill production. Our paper is sent to citizens of our community living C-27, An Act to enhance the financial accountability and away from home, as well as our local residents. We have grown transparency of First Nations, as reported (with amendment) from support for our paper today, and our paper enjoys 90% approval the committee, and of the motions in Group No. 1. rating from our citizens when it comes to receiving timely The Speaker: There are five minutes left for questions and information from the administration and council.
    [Show full text]
  • CDSG Newsletter
    CDSGThe Newsletter The Coast Defense Study Group, Inc. — November 2012 Chairman's Message CDSG Meeting and Tour Calendar Chris Zeeman Please advise Terry McGovern of any additions or changes at [email protected]. This time of year is one when we typically give thanks. Here in the Northeast we are thankful that the recent storms have spared CDSG Annual Conference the majority of our fragile coast defense sites. I have not heard of April 24-28, 2013 any reports from remote locations such as how the dock at Fort Pensacola/Mobile Michie fared, or how Fort Mansfield withstood the storm surge. David Ogden, [email protected] With the exception of the sites just mentioned, I have not heard of any sites being damaged in Long Island Sound or Narragansett Bay. CDSG Special Tour Unfortunately, the storm had a huge impact on the coastal areas June 8 - 19, 2013 of New York and New Jersey. Places such as the Rockaways (Fort Norway Tilden) and Sandy Hook (Fort Hancock) bore the brunt of the Terry McGovern, [email protected] damage. In addition I have seen pictures of extensive flooding at Fort Mott. It may be some time before we can get accurate damage Proposed CDSG Special Tour reports from these hard hit areas. February 2014 Hopefully the CDSG can take a role in the cleanup and rebuild- Manila Bay, the Philippines ing. We can help in two ways – first by have members pitch in Andy Grant, [email protected] and volunteer, and second – with the CDSG Fund. Once again we are counting on local members to get involved, keep us updated, CDSG Annual Conference and help out the local sites! Finally I would like to announce my October 2014 appointment as chairperson for the upcoming year.
    [Show full text]
  • WHS Nomination.Qxd
    5. Protection and Management Parks Canada Agency Act, 1998 of the Property The Parks Canada Agency’s responsibilities to commemorate, acquire and administer historic places are defined under the authority of the Parks Canada Agency Act. A. Ownership The Government of Canada is the owner of the property by virtue of the British North America Department of Transport Act, 1985 Act (1867). In 1998, the Parks Canada Agency Act established the Parks Canada Agency to operate Pursuant to the Department of Transport Act, the and manage Canada’s national historic sites and Historic Canals Regulations are a third legislation national parks, under the direction of a Chief mechanism under which the nominated property Executive Officer reporting to the Parliament is protected. The Parks Canada Agency administers of Canada through a Minister nominated by the Historic Canals Regulations, which apply to the the Prime Minister. management, maintenance, use and protection of historic canals. B. Protective designation C. Means of implementing protective The nominated property is protected under three measures federal statutes. The Government of Canada is the sole owner of all Historic Sites and Monuments Act, 1952-53 the elements of the nominated property and the land on which they are situated. It also owns the The elements of the nominated property have been bed of the watercourse of the Rideau Canal up to commemorated as national historic sites of Canada the controlled high water elevation on the shore. under the authority of the Government of The nominated property is protected by a federal Canada’s Historic Sites and Monuments Act planning and regulatory framework, but lands (Appendix N), which empowers the Minister beyond its boundaries fall under provincial and responsible for the Parks Canada Agency to municipal jurisdictions.
    [Show full text]