DOCSLIB.ORG

North American Martello Towers Author(S): Willard B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North American Martello Towers Author(S): Willard B North American Martello Towers Author(s): Willard B. Robinson Source: Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 33, No. 2 (May, 1974), pp. 158-164 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the Society of Architectural Historians Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/988909 . Accessed: 01/08/2013 20:57 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press and Society of Architectural Historians are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 132.206.27.24 on Thu, 1 Aug 2013 20:57:31 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 158 North American Martello Towers As with all architecturefor defense,once the effectiveness of the basic configuration was proven, the defense was WILLARD B. ROBINSON formulated; only minor changes were thereafter made, either to improve efficiencyor to adaptto a particularsite. The Museum, Texas Tech University Circular or elliptical in plan, most Martello towers had diametersof thirty or more feet-in additionto being very HISTORICALLY, military architecturehas been noted for strong, curved forms enclosed a large amount of area per its beauty and logic. Characterizedby handsome geo- length of perimeter.On an open platform at the top were metrical configurations, fortifications were unified by mounted one or more smoothbore cannons, en barbette, functions which organically determined their forms and usually on traversingcarriages. The facilities necessaryto their relationships.Among the numerousworks for defense support both the garrisonand the battery were contained wherein purpose beautifully and clearly generated form within, on severalfloors. was the Martello tower, a work which is little military in towers were to known but which was once an to Simple form, designed effectively today, importantadjunct resist assault.Built either of stone or the walls were the defensesof several North American cities. brick, usually between six and fourteen feet thick, to provide a The Martello tower was named after a tall cylindrical bombproof enclosure,and over twenty feet high, to resist structuresituated in the Bay of Martellain Corsica.' In 1794 escalade.Then, accessto the interiorwas furnished this tower, one cannon, became only by mounting only heavy a located ten or more feet above the famous authoritieswhen two British men- single door, ground. among military to this entrancewas a ladder or small of-war were defeated from behind its the Communication up parapet.During wooden stair. encounter, little damage was inflicted on the Frenchwork The victims of the Bay of Martellaincident were natu- by the ships, well demonstratingthe strength of the struc- ture.2 tise on Fortification(London, 1862), pp. 375-376; and U. S., Congress, 1. The word "Martello" is evidently a corruption from the House, Joseph G. Totten, Report on Fortifications,House Ex. Doc. geographical term "Cape Martella." In virtually all nineteenth- 5, 32nd Cong., ist Sess., 1851, p. 72. See also Hilary P. Mead, century treatises on the art of fortification, the corrupted term is "Martello Towers, Coast Defense Against Napoleon," Country used to identify the architectural type. Life, 87 (10 Feb. 1940), 152-153, and, for a detailed discussion of the 2. The incident which made the Martello tower famous and battle, Sheila Sutcliffe, Martello Towers (Cranbury, N.J., 1973), PP. which evidently gave the tower its name was noted in numerous 19-21 (drawings of the Corsican tower are reproduced on pp. 18 documents on fortification. For example see Captain Lendy, Trea- and 35; a photo of a model on p. 36). SWTWN torw *,-?A., ..fA 4*At# 4w &s A6 ACwQ ? lr~ ~ 19 -O A'tr r..IJA q17 Fig. i. Tower No. 45 on the Coast of Sussex,England. Section (reproductionsof Crown-copyrightrecords in the Public RecordsOffice, London, appearby permissionof the Controllerof H. M. StationeryOffice). This content downloaded from 132.206.27.24 on Thu, 1 Aug 2013 20:57:31 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 159 rally impressed with the inherent strength of the work which witnessed the defeat of their vessels. Subsequently, in 1796 Martello towers were adopted as basic adjunctsto the defenses of England, and were later erected in con- siderablenumbers along the shores of Kent and Sussex,3 in responseto a threatof aggressionby Napoleon (Fig. 1). 'I Later, designs for them were imported into Canada by English military engineers who were occupied with the defense of a land boundary on the south and a sea frontier on the east. Acting upon the need for strongerdefenses after Canada \ LIYr~ Ak'' had been won in the French and Indian War, Royal Engineers dedicated their efforts to either rebuilding de- stroyed works or constructing anew the fortificationsfor key cities as well as for their arteries of communication. Repairs were made on the enceinte of Quebec until the 01 /yaw . A?~? walls separatingthe city from the Plains of Abrahamhad been reconstructedentirely, largely upon French founda- tions.4In addition to the main works, consisting of a series of curtains and bastions, an outer line was proposed by Gother Mann (1747-1830), a military engineer sent to Canada to command the Royal Military Engineers from 1785 until 1791 and again from 1794 until 1804.s The projecteddefenses included a chain of advancedlunettes- / 00 works with two faces and two flanks,open at the rear.6To I AA- be located some 800 yards from the enceinte, they were intended to force an enemy aggressorto commence siege operationsfar away from the city. Although the need for advanced works was controversial,7 the lunettes were re- and four Martello towers were erected be- jected finally Fig. 2. Martello towers, Quebec. Plans, section, and elevation tween 1805 and 1832, about 1,ooo yards west of the city (PublicArchives of Canada,Ottawa). walls along a line running northwest to southeast. Spacedabout 450 yardsapart, the towers were all similar. The centersfor the radii of the interiorand exteriorfaces of the stone walls were offset, creating a thicknessof thirteen feet on the side facing the field and seven facing the city (Fig. 2). The strongest part of the wall therefore was oriented to the directionfrom which enemy missileswould 3. Lendy, Treatise, 375; CharlesOman, Castles(London, 1926), p. should ever become unten- p. 24. Seventy-four Martellos were built in Sussex and Kent. come in an attack. If a tower Twenty-nine more were built north of these, along the shores of able, the lesser thicknessof the opposite side would facili- Essexand Suffolk:Sutcliffe, Martello Towers, p. 6o. tate destructionfrom the of the enceinte of the The of these fortificationscan be seen in nu- ramparts 4. development Accessible at the merous manuscriptdrawings deposited in the Map Room, Public city, to prevent enemy occupation. only Archives of Canada,Ottawa; the ArchivesNationales, Paris; and second floor, two stories were contained within each the BritishMuseum, London. tower. of all Martello towers, the powder maga- 2nd ed. Typical 5. Dictionaryof CanadianBiography, (Toronto, 1945), s.v. and the were in the GotherMann. zine was in the ground story quarters 6. GotherMann, "Planof the Fortificationsof Quebecwith New second. On the platform above, cannons were mounted Works Proposed," 1 August 1804, Public Archives of Canada, behind a thick parapet.This platformwas supportedby an H1/340, Quebec, 1804. annular the centerline of the crown of which was 7. the documents the natureof this controversy vault, Among relating an were, Committee of Royal Engineersto The Earl of Chatham,14 concentricwith the inner wall line, creating interesting March 1805, Public Archives of Canada, Military Series (R.G.8, structurewith a double curvature.Below this, the lower Series and GotherMann to The Earl of c, vol. 384); Chatham,23 floors were framed conventionally with timber. March 1805, Public Archives of Canada,Military Series (R.G.8, While the towers were to defend Seriesii, vol. lo). Quebec designed This content downloaded from 132.206.27.24 on Thu, 1 Aug 2013 20:57:31 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 16o ,I c: za:. - :?.:; _--; C; ,*;?,? i.,iv I t? r ,^~ ?r'?:?-: ^~?e r; ?wi *i~, :`? ~???; IX?r:- :-;?'? ;?, Fig. 3. Branchtower, Fort Henry, Kingston,Ontario (courtesy:Amon CarterMuseum of WesternArt, Fort Worth, Texas). This content downloaded from 132.206.27.24 on Thu, 1 Aug 2013 20:57:31 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 161 againstland approaches,others were developed for defense . againstthe attacksof ships. AnotherMartello tower erected near Lancaster,New Brunswick, during the War of 18128 further demonstratedthe confidence of Royal Engineersin this form. Later, a chain of towers appearedon the shores of Lake Ontario. Located at Kingston, Ontario, these were among the most importantfortifications of Upper Canada.Describing the strategic importance of the city in 1819, the Duke of Wellington reported that it "is the connecting point be- i i : aa::;: ~i:??~-r tween the Upper and Lower Province. It contains the B:B Dockyard on Lake Ontario,... is the most populous Town in the Province, and . [is] liable at all times to be at- tacked."9In 1826 LieutenantColonel Ross of the Wright Fig. 4. Murneytower, Kingston, Ontario (National Historic Sites Royal Engineers arrived to develop plans for new forti- Service,Ottawa, Ontario). fications to replace the outmoded works that had been thrown up after the opening of the 1812 hostilities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dymchurch Martello Tower No 24 KENT
    English Heritage Dymchurch Martello Tower No 24 KENT J G LOAD MA, FSA Inspector of Ancient Monuments Between 1793 and 1815 Britain was at War with the French Republic. After his campaigns in Italy, Egypt and Syria, Napoleon Bonaparte began extensive preparations to invade England. To counter the threatened invasion, the English built a chain of 74 Martello gun-towers along the Channel shores of Kent and East Sussex between 1805 and 1812. Of those that survive today, the Martello tower at Dymchurch is perhaps the best preserved. Fully restored and open to the public, it is dominated by an original 24-pounder gun carrying the cipher of King George III. CONTENTS 2 HISTORY 2 The Invasion Coast, 1803 6 Defending the South Coast 7 Origins and purpose of the Martellos 9 Building the Martello Towers, 1805-12 10 Design of the South Coast towers 13 Later History 14 DESCRIPTION 15 Interior of the Tower 17 Gun Platform 18 BIBLIOGRAPHY 18 GLOSSARY of technical terms Copyright © English Heritage 1990 First published 1990 Printed in England for HMSO Dd 6018381 C15 8/90 498 53309 ISBN 1 85074 300 2 1 HISTORY The Invasion Coast 1803 Dymchurch Martello Tower - no 24 in a chain of 74 built along the Channel coasts of Kent and East Sussex between 1805 and 1812 - was constructed to meet a threat of invasion as serious as the later one which faced England after the fall of France in the summer of 1940. The Peace of Amiens, signed in March 1802, had ended nine years of war with Revolutionary France, but Napoleon's territorial ambitions in Europe and elsewhere were to ensure that peace was short-lived.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Henry National Historic Site of Canada
    © Copyright Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Chief Executive Officer of Parks Canada, 2006 Government of Canada Catalogue No. R64-105/41-2006E ISBN: 0-662-44230-X Aussi disponible en français. Fort Henry national historic site of canada Management Plan February, 2007 FORT HENRY NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE OF CANADA Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction . .1 1.1 Purpose of a Management Plan . .1 1.2 Preparation of this Management Plan . .1 1.3 Legislative and Policy Context for Management Planning . .2 1.4 Brief History of the Site . .3 1.5 Administered Place . .4 1.6 Local and Regional Context . .4 2.0 The Role of Fort Henry in the Family of National Historic Sites . .6 2.1 Role of Fort Henry in the National Historic Sites System . .6 3.0 Commemorative Integrity . .8 3.1 Concept of Commemorative Integrity . .8 3.2 The Commemorative Integrity Statement for Fort Henry . .8 3.3 Statement of Commemorative Intent . .8 4.0 Current Situation Analysis . .10 4.1 Cultural Resources . .10 4.1.1 Built Heritage . .10 4.1.2 Archaeological Sites . .12 4.1.3 Collections . .13 4.1.4 The Cultural Landscape . .13 4.2 The Presentation of Messages at Fort Henry . .15 4.2.1 Heritage Presentation Programming at Fort Henry . .16 4.3 Natural Resources at Fort Henry . .17 4.4 Visitor Use and Operations . .17 5.0 Vision for Fort Henry . .18 5.1. Context of a Site Vision . .18 5.2 Vision for Fort Henry National Historic Site in 2021 .
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Rideau Canal World Heritage Site Management Plan
    2005 Foreword The Rideau Canal bears witness to 19th century engineering excellence, most notably through its ingenious adaptive design and brilliant execution. As well as being a technological feat, it provides an eloquent illustration of the defence measures taken by the British Empire in Canada in the early 1800s, which resulted in the transformation of Canada’s eastern Ontario hinterland into a transportation route whose integrity has, to this day, been maintained at an exceptionally high level. This linear serial nomination incorporates six elements that together will become the Rideau Canal World Heritage Site. These are: the Rideau Canal National Historic Site of Canada, Fort Henry National Historic Site of Canada, Fort Frederick, Cathcart Tower, Shoal Tower and Murney Tower (the Kingston Fortifications National Historic Site of Canada). This management plan specifies how the world heritage values of the nominated property will be protected for present and future generations. It constitutes the formal commitment of the Parks Canada Agency, the responsible Canadian management organization, to the conservation and protection of the property. It identifies the world heritage values that will be protected, the legislative and policy framework for management of the property, the elements of the management system in place to protect the property, and mechanisms for monitoring and periodic reporting. As a high-level, overarching management plan, this document unites the specific operational plans for the six elements by identifying and elaborating management commitments and actions that will result in an integrated approach to administering the world heritage site. I am very grateful to our dedicated team from Parks Canada, the World Heritage Site steering committee and to all of the local organizations and individuals who have demonstrated good will, hard work, spirit of cooperation and extraordinary sense of stewardship.
    [Show full text]
  • Martello Towers Research Project
    Martello Towers Research Project March 2008 Jason Bolton MA MIAI IHBC www.boltonconsultancy.com Conservation Consultant [email protected] Executive Summary “Billy Pitt had them built, Buck Mulligan said, when the French were on the sea”, Ulysses, James Joyce. The „Martello Towers Research Project‟ was commissioned by Fingal County Council and Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council, with the support of The Heritage Council, in order to collate all known documentation relating to the Martello Towers of the Dublin area, including those in Bray, Co. Wicklow. The project was also supported by Dublin City Council and Wicklow County Council. Martello Towers are one of the most well-known fortifications in the world, with examples found throughout Ireland, the United Kingdom and along the trade routes to Africa, India and the Americas. The towers are typically squat, cylindrical, two-storey masonry towers positioned to defend a strategic section of coastline from an invading force, with a landward entrance at first-floor level defended by a machicolation, and mounting one or more cannons to the rooftop gun platform. The Dublin series of towers, built 1804-1805, is the only group constructed to defend a capital city, and is the most complete group of towers still existing in the world. The report begins with contemporary accounts of the construction and significance of the original tower at Mortella Point in Corsica from 1563-5, to the famous attack on that tower in 1794, where a single engagement involving key officers in the British military became the catalyst for a global military architectural phenomenon. However, the design of the Dublin towers is not actually based on the Mortella Point tower.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAINING the HUDSON the Fight for the River in the American Revolution
    CHAINING THE HUDSON The fight for the river in the American Revolution COLN DI Chaining the Hudson Relic of the Great Chain, 1863. Look back into History & you 11 find the Newe improvers in the art of War has allways had the advantage of their Enemys. —Captain Daniel Joy to the Pennsylvania Committee of Safety, January 16, 1776 Preserve the Materials necessary to a particular and clear History of the American Revolution. They will yield uncommon Entertainment to the inquisitive and curious, and at the same time afford the most useful! and important Lessons not only to our own posterity, but to all succeeding Generations. Governor John Hancock to the Massachusetts House of Representatives, September 28, 1781. Chaining the Hudson The Fight for the River in the American Revolution LINCOLN DIAMANT Fordham University Press New York Copyright © 2004 Fordham University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored ii retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or any other—except for brief quotation: printed reviews, without the prior permission of the publisher. ISBN 0-8232-2339-6 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Diamant, Lincoln. Chaining the Hudson : the fight for the river in the American Revolution / Lincoln Diamant.—Fordham University Press ed. p. cm. Originally published: New York : Carol Pub. Group, 1994. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8232-2339-6 (pbk.) 1. New York (State)—History—Revolution, 1775-1783—Campaigns. 2. United States—History—Revolution, 1775-1783—Campaigns. 3. Hudson River Valley (N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report \
    DEPARTMENT OF . NORTHERN AFFAIRS •CANADA AND NATIONAL RES81t1C'ES ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 1954-1955 HUMAN PROBLEMS IN THE CANADIAN NORTH \ \ \ \ \ CANADA ANNUAL REPORT DEPARTMENT OF Northern Affairs and National Resources Fiscal Year 1954 ·1955 and Human Problems in the Canadian North Price, 50 cents To His Excellency the Right Honourable Vincent Massey, C.H., Governor General and Commander-in-Chief of Canada. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR ExCELLENCY: The undersigned has the honour to lay before Your Excellency the Annual Report of the Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1955. Respectfully submitted, JEAN LESAGE, Minister of Northern Affairs and National Resources. 61937-11 The Honourable Jean Lesage, M.P., Minister of Northern Affairs and National Resources, Ottawa. SIR: I have the honour to submit the Second Annual Report of the Department of Northern Affairs and National Resources which covers the fiscal year ended on the 31st of March, 1955. The Report is prefaced by an article concerning human problems in the Canadian north, a matter of special interest at the present time. Your obedient servant, R. G. ROBERTSON, Deputy Minister. DepartDlent of Northern Affairs and National Resources Minister ....................... HON. JEAN LESAGE Executive Assistant ............. G. A. CODERRE Private Secretary .............. DENYS PARE Deputy Minister's Office Deputy Minister ................ R. G. ROBERTSON Assistant Deputy Minister ....... C. W. JACKSON Assistant Deputy Minister ....... M. LAMONTAGNE Executive Officer ................ R. A. J. PHlLLIPS Secretary, Advisory Committee on Northern Development ........ G. W. ROWLEY Northern Administralion and Lands Branch Director ........................ F. J. G. CUNNINGHAM Territorial Division ....................... Chief-F. FRASER Arctic Division ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Vauban Circular Walk the Vauban Circular Walk
    The Vauban Circular Walk The Vauban Circular Walk The Vauban circuit takes visitors through the historic parts of the city of Luxembourg to the points of strategic importance in one of Europe’s most impressive fortresses, through old city gates and dark casemates, across large fortified bridges to caponiers and a series of bastions. The circuit bears the name of the famous French military engineer, active during the reign of Louis XIV, Sebastien Le Prestre de Vauban (1633-1707). Appointed commissioner for fortifications at the age of just twenty-two, Vauban built or enlarged more than 160 fortresses in total. When he arrived in Luxembourg with the French enemy troops, the Spanish held sovereignty over the fortified city, which from the Middle Ages onward had been ruled by a number of foreign powers in turn. Highly experienced in warfare, Vauban was entrusted with the technical control of the siege of Luxembourg by the French in 1684. After the capture of the fortified city, he oversaw the reconstruction work on the fortress, turning it into the “Gibraltar of the North”, one of Europe's mightiest fortresses of the age. Even though the fortress was almost totally demolished (starting in 1867), the reconstruction work and the addition of forts, redoubts and barracks built by Vauban between 1685 and 1688 with the help of 3,000 labourers, earned the city View over the old town the prestige it still enjoys today. In 1994, sections of the forti- fications and the Old Town were listed as a UNESCO World Heritage site. Following the traces of Vauban (General Commissioner for Fortifications), you will discover sites that bear witness to Luxembourg’s military past, experience the medieval charm of the old Lower Town of Pfaffenthal and, from the fortified heights, enjoy breathtaking panoramic views of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Martello Towers of Romney Marsh
    Introduction Martello Towers, sometimes known simply as Martellos, are small defensive forts that were built across the British Empire during the 19th century, from the time of the Napoleonic Wars onwards. Many were built along the Kent coast to defend Britain against the French in the early 1800s, then under the rule of Napoleon Bonaparte. Given that the Romney Marsh beaches are just 29 miles away from the French Coast across the English Channel, it was one of the areas that was most at risk from invasion by Napoleon's forces. Originally 103 towers were built in England between 1805 and 1812’. 74 were built along the Kent and Sussex coastlines from Folkestone to Seaford between 1805 and 1808, the other 29 to protect Essex and Suffolk. 45 of the towers still remain, but many are in ruins or have been converted, and only 9 remain in their (almost) original condition. Along the coastline of Romney Marsh, from Dymchurch Redoubt, south of Hythe, to St Mary's Bay, there were 9 Martello Towers built. Martello Towers Nos. 19, 20, 21, 22, 26 and 27 have since been demolished, but Towers Nos. 23, 24,and 25 still remain. Index Introduction……………………….. Page 2 Origins and Purpose…………….. Page 3 Design………………………..…… Page 4 Key Features…………………..…. Page 4 Artist’s Impression and Plans…… Page 5 Martello Tower No. 19………..….. Page 6 Martello Tower No. 20………..….. Page 7 Martello Tower No. 21………..….. Page 7 Martello Tower No. 22……..…….. Page 7 Martello Tower No. 23……..…….. Page 8 Martello Tower No. 24……..…….. Page 9 Martello Tower No. 25……..…….
    [Show full text]
  • Ireland Had Been a Lordship Under the Authority of the English Crown Since
    C.H.E.P.A. (CORK HARBOUR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ASSOCIATION) WITNESS STATEMENT 5TH MAY, 2009 AN BORD PLEANÁLA STRATEGIC INFRASTRUCTURE APPLICATION PL04.PA0010 WASTE-TO-ENERGY FACILITY AND TRANSFER STATION AT RINGASKIDDY, CO. CORK APPLICANT: INDAVER (IRELAND) My name is Marcia D’Alton. I am a member of CHEPA, the Cork Harbour Environmental Protection Association. CHEPA is an organisation which brings residents of all sides of Cork Harbour together with the common aim of protecting and improving the living and recreational environment of Cork Harbour. I am Deputy Mayor of Passage West Town Council. The jurisdiction of Passage West Town Council encompasses the three harbourside towns of Passage West, Glenbrook and Monkstown. During my term as elected member, I drafted the Architectural Design Guidelines for Passage West and Monkstown in consultation with and on behalf of Passage West Town Council. These have since been acknowledged in the current Carrigaline Electoral Area Local Area Plan and will be incorporated into the redrafting of the Local Area Plan in 2012. I have delivered presentations on the architectural heritage of Passage West and Monkstown on behalf of Passage West Town Council to several departments within Cork County Council, to larger developers with an interest in the towns and to community groups. The aim of these initatives was to achieve a common goal for new development to complement and enhance the valuable architectural heritage of Passage West and Monkstown. I have researched, designed and produced the Passage West and Monkstown Railway Heritage Trail which celebrates items of railway infrastructure along the route of the old Cork, Blackrock and Passage Railway.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Cities of Romance
    CANADIAN CITI E S of R O MAN C E By K A T H E R I N E A L E H “ M R S H N R V I ' . J O G A N ) N “ ” “ ’ A U T H O R O F Gr e K n ittin The Wiz z te y g , ’ ” Comm ue etc . , D O R O T H Y S T E V E N S P U B L I S H E D a t T O R O N T O by M c c L E L L A N D an d S T E W A R T COPYR I LIMITE D TORONTO C A N A D I A N C I T I E S o f R O M A N C E These sketches call attention to aphase of Canadian history largely unregarded , the romantic background of many of our towns and cities . The writer has not t described every romantic ci y of Canada , nor does this claim to be a modern guide book . The portrayals are unique , not only because of the vivid impressions of one a a who is poet as well as prose writer of distinction , but on account of the association established between certain authors and certain places . The volume is there a a . fore liter ry sketch book , as well as a book of cities E BL R TH P U ISH E . So many of my friends , from one end of Canada to the t other, have helped me in the matter of hese stories that thei r names would make a substantial addition to this book .
    [Show full text]
  • January, 1907
    .. - ,.. .... .... i'... MAJOR GENERAL JOHN F. WESTON. UNITED STATES ABXY. JOURNAL OF THE United States Cavalry Association. - .-. VOL. XVII. JANUARY, 1907. No. 63. PORT ARTHUR. BY SECOSOLIELTESAST HESRT J. REILLI’. Swosn CAVALRY.* IRST a brief description will be given of the vicinity of F Port Arthur. Running almost due north from the harbor of Port Arthur is the valley of the Lun Ho. The Lun Ho and its tributaries drain the major part of the Shuishih valley, a valley running in a general northwesterly and southeasterly direction, about three miles to the north of Port Arthur. On the shore of the harbor, to the east of the Lun Ho and separated from it by a hill, is the “Old (official) Town” of Port Arthur, while to the west of the Lun i Ho is the “New (commercial) Town.” Between two and two and a half miles from the Old Town is a continuous chain of hills running from the Lua Ho in a general form of a semi- circle to the Yellow Sea. The peaks of this chain run from *Lieutenant Reilly had the good luck to visit Port Arthur in the fall of IWS. The article is entirely the result of his own observations. All draw- ings were made by him, and he took the photos given herewith. In his manu- script names were spelled after the Japanese pronunciation. This has been changed by the JOURNAL to the orthography adopted by the War Department. 1 The article was prepared for the Second Division, General Staff, and is here reproduced by its courtesy.
    [Show full text]
  • Towers of Strength by W H Clements the Construction
    Towers of Strength by W H Clements The construction of masonry gun-towers by British military engineers covered a period of eighty years from 1780 to 1860. Gun-towers were a standard element in the portfolio of the military engineer in the seventeenth and the eighteenth century and many were built in the Mediterranean by Spanish and Italian engineers; but it was the development of these towers by British engineers in the early nineteenth century which resulted in the simple, elegant, and extremely practical design which is today known as the Martello tower. Although the construction of the English towers did not start until 1805, towers had already been built on Minorca and Trinidad, and in 1803 work had started on similar towers in Ireland. Other towers had been completed even earlier on Jersey and Guernsey, at Halifax in Canada, and also at Cape Town. These towers were the forerunners of the extensive chain of English towers built between 1805 and 1810. Situated for the most part to defend the coastline from attack from the sea and usually sited to provide each other with mutual fire-support, these towers would have been difficult to destroy. The majority provided the first line of defence for the most vulnerable part of the English coast, that nearest to the ancient enemy France. Others were to be found in Ireland and throughout the British Empire, and a number were used as land defences to protect the outworks of citadels and colonial frontiers. This was the case in Quebec, Delhi and on the frontier of the Eastern Cape Province in South Africa, where Martello towers provided a cheap and effective form of permanent fortification.
    [Show full text]