22 News from Southeast Asia Regional Editor The Region The Indonesian Studies Program Terence Chong

The Indonesian Studies Program

This issue offers three articles from the Studies Programme (ISP) at ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute (ISEAS). ISP promotes in-depth understanding of Indonesia through conferences, workshops, seminars, publications and timely commentary in regional and international media. ISP seeks to under- stand the effects of political and economic reform in Indonesia following the end of the era, especially with respect to the implementation ndonesia will be holding its legislative and of decentralisation policies throughout the archipelagic nation. presidential elections simultaneously in April I2019. Since the 2014 presidential elections, and the victory of President , Indonesia’s electoral landscape has been marked by an unusual level of ideological division, and an upswing in populist politics and Islamist activism. Why have such divisions emerged, and will they affect the upcoming presidential and legislative elections? And what impact will the simultaneous implementation of these two different elections have upon campaigns and voter preferences? ISP has a team of researchers monitoring these developments, and providing timely analysis on campaign dynamics, patterns of coalition- building, and the broader consequences of these elections for the health and stability of Indonesia’s democracy.

The Co-coordinators of ISP are Dr Siwage Dharma Negara and Dr Norshahril Saat. For more information please visit: https://www.iseas.edu.sg/programmes/ country-studies/indonesia-studies Joko Widodo. Image reproduced under a Creative Commons license courtesy of Eduardo M.C. on Flickr. Original image: https://www.flickr.com/photos/edumariz/10374500436. License: CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Nevertheless, Yudhoyono outlined a series segment of Widodo’s supporters consider to Transactionalism and shallowness of policy points that he shared with Prabowo. be issues that the President supports. However, These were, however, all formulated in very all these previous ideological and political in Indonesia’s election campaign general terms, and could have also been positions have been quickly forgotten. supported by Widodo. There were no real ideological or policy differences of sufficient Max Lane importance to be a hindrance to Yudhoyono Conclusion joining either Widodo or Prabowo’s coalition. Nevertheless, there are early developments that may hint at some change in democratic he campaign for Indonesia’s April 2019 national budget and other policies requiring practices. First it should be noted that presidential and parliamentary elections legislation required parliamentary approval Shallowness in contestation Prabowo’s treatment of his coalition partners Tofficially kicked off on 23 September and Widodo’s 2014 coalition of parties initially Alongside this transactionalism is the exhibits a disdain for transactionalism itself. 2018. However, a more interesting process did not have a majority in the parliament, thus shallowness in ideological contestation. The Currently, any semblance of democracy preceded the official campaign. It was the making transactions necessary. To run a stable early phase of the 2014 Widodo Administration mainly relates to the openness of negotiations process to determine which parties fulfilled government, Widodo needed to both satisfy all reflected both the transactional nature of between the myriad segments of the broad the requirements to stand candidates in the parties supporting him as well as win over Indonesian politics as well as the shallowness elite, including the middle class. As such, with the elections and which parties would enter parties that had not supported him. He was of contestation. For example, there were no the exception of West , there are no into coalitions in support of the respective able to do this by bringing over the National ideological or policy issues preventing parties serious political threats to the status quo from presidential candidates. Mandate Party (PAN), the United Development that previously supported Prabowo in 2014 to outside of the elite. Such a pre-campaign process reflects two Party, and , all of which had supported cross over to Widodo’s side. Of the three parties Gerindra’s 2014 call for indirect elections features of contemporary politics in Indonesia. Widodo’s opponent, , in 2014. in parliament, but outside the government, only rather than direct elections was based on First, Indonesian politics is still characterised All these parties were given Ministries to run. one remains outside the government because the desire to limit negotiations to the electing by what can be called ‘transactionalism’ Transactional politics certainly featured of ideological differences, namely PKS. of executives by parliament, in contrast to [politik transaksi], namely, a process of prominently in Prabowo’s 2018 selection of The other two, Yudhoyono’s PD and Prabowo the current long-drawn negotiations that negotiations among a plethora of factions vice-presidential candidate. There was the Subianto’s Gerindra Party, represent rivals continue up to and throughout the campaign. within the Indonesian elite driven by concerns initial question of whether Susilo Bambang for the Presidency, and so need to cultivate Gerindra’s call was desirous of more centralistic about elektabilitas (popularity among the Yudhoyono’s party, the Democratic Party a separate profile from the ruling coalition. ‘leadership’ over the elite. One factor that may voting public). (PD), would join the coalition with Gerindra, Indeed, the negotiations needed to form disrupt such transactionalism in this current The second feature is an extreme Islamist (PKS), and coalitions expose the shallowness of the campaign is the presence of two parties shallowness of contestation in the sense PAN. Yudhoyono and the PD were caught in a ideological and policy contestation and the directly linked to , through family ties, that all of the political and economic elite bind. It was clear that there were ambitions for centrality of elektabilitas in the coming April in Prabowo’s coalition. These are Party Garuda agree on most, if not all, aspects of cultural, Yudhoyono’s son, 2019 elections. For example, Widodo’s selection and Partai Karya, linked to social, political and economic strategies. (known as AHY), to be a presidential of 75-year-old Ma’ruf Amin, the Chairperson and Titiek Suharto respectively, which may This shallowness of contestation means that candidate in 2024. However, under existing of the Islamic Scholars Assembly (MUI) and of call for a return to Suharto-style policies. the elections will resemble a superficial image law, a party that does not nominate a Nahdlatul Ulama, demonstrates the absence of This, however, is not clear yet. It also appears war with little, if any, policy content. presidential candidate in 2019, would not be ideological boundaries. Ma’ruf Amin’s willingness that the Prabowo campaign may wish to allowed to do so in 2024. PD had to join either to be Widodo’s vice-presidential candidate focus on economic policy questions rather Prabowo or Widodo. Most of the discussions stands in contrast to his previous positions. than issues of either political culture or Political transactionalism carried out between Yudhoyono and Prabowo He himself had proclaimed that he was a religion. The campaign orientation of the During the 2014 elections, a crucial part took place behind closed doors, so we cannot central figure behind the 2016 December 2nd two Presidential candidates should become of Joko Widodo’s image was that of a politician be sure of what exactly transpired. Finally, (or 212) Islamic mobilisations against clearer as the election date draws near. who would reject politik transaksi – the Yudhoyono as Chairperson of PD announced, Governor Purnama; mobilisations which relied politics of deal-making with political players standing alongside Prabowo, that PD would on forces hostile to Widodo. He had also been Max Lane is Visiting Senior Fellow and parties that would be given government support Prabowo for President and join that a close collaborator with Yudhoyono during the at ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. positions such as those in Ministries. In reality, coalition. There was no explicit commitment latter’s presidency, and has not been close to This piece is a condensed version however, the idea that President Widodo could by Prabowo to choose AHY. Indeed, the Megawati, Chairperson of the PDIP, Widodo’s of his ISEAS Perspective paper which be a non-transactional president was always public position was that PD would support party. He had been a public critic of liberalism can be read in full here: untenable. This is because, since 2004, the whomever Prabowo selected. and pluralism, which at least a significant https://tinyurl.com/iseas201875