Metrolinx Maple and Rutherford Go Station Construction - Wards 1 & 4
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Regional Express Rail Update
Clause 5 in Report No. 10 of Committee of the Whole was adopted by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on June 23, 2016 with the following additional recommendation: 3. Receipt of the memorandum from Daniel Kostopoulos, Commissioner of Transportation Services, dated June 22, 2016. 5 Regional Express Rail Update Committee of the Whole recommends adoption of the following recommendations contained in the report dated June 1, 2016 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services: 1. Metrolinx be requested to mitigate the impacts of Regional Express Rail service by addressing the gap between their Initial Business Case for Regional Express Rail and York Region’s needs for grade separations, additional GO stations and parking charges. 2. The Regional Clerk circulate this report to Metrolinx, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Clerks of the local municipalities. Report dated June 1, 2016 from the Commissioner of Transportation Services now follows: 1. Recommendations It is recommended that: 1. Metrolinx be requested to mitigate the impacts of Regional Express Rail service by addressing the gap between their Initial Business Case for Regional Express Rail and York Region’s needs for grade separations, additional GO stations and parking charges. 2. The Regional Clerk circulate this report to Metrolinx, Ontario Ministry of Transportation and Clerks of the local municipalities. Committee of the Whole 1 June 9, 2016 Regional Express Rail Update 2. Purpose This report provides an update to Council on the Provincial Regional Express Rail (RER) Service Plan and associated staff activities as York Region’s response to the RER Service Plan to be implemented by the Province over the next 10 years. -
Volume 5 Has Been Updated to Reflect the Specific Additions/Revisions Outlined in the Errata to the Environmental Project Report, Dated November, 2017
DISCLAIMER AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY This Revised Final Environmental Project Report – Volume 5 has been updated to reflect the specific additions/revisions outlined in the Errata to the Environmental Project Report, dated November, 2017. As such, it supersedes the previous Final version dated October, 2017. The report dated October, 2017 (“Report”), which includes its text, tables, figures and appendices) has been prepared by Gannett Fleming Canada ULC (“Gannett Fleming”) and Morrison Hershfield Limited (“Morrison Hershfield”) (“Consultants”) for the exclusive use of Metrolinx. Consultants disclaim any liability or responsibility to any person or party other than Metrolinx for loss, damage, expense, fines, costs or penalties arising from or in connection with the Report or its use or reliance on any information, opinion, advice, conclusion or recommendation contained in it. To the extent permitted by law, Consultants also excludes all implied or statutory warranties and conditions. In preparing the Report, the Consultants have relied in good faith on information provided by third party agencies, individuals and companies as noted in the Report. The Consultants have assumed that this information is factual and accurate and has not independently verified such information except as required by the standard of care. The Consultants accept no responsibility or liability for errors or omissions that are the result of any deficiencies in such information. The opinions, advice, conclusions and recommendations in the Report are valid as of the date of the Report and are based on the data and information collected by the Consultants during their investigations as set out in the Report. The opinions, advice, conclusions and recommendations in the Report are based on the conditions encountered by the Consultants at the site(s) at the time of their investigations, supplemented by historical information and data obtained as described in the Report. -
2018 ONTARIO Budget for General Inquiries Regarding 2018 Ontario Budget: Budget Papers, Please Call
2018 ONTARIO BUDGE 2018 ONTARIO A PLAN FOR CARE AND OPPORTUNITY RX C. Lee RX T THE HONOURABLE CHARLES SOUSA MINISTER OF FINANCE 2018 ONTARIO BUDGET BUDGET PAPERS For general inquiries regarding 2018 Ontario Budget: Budget Papers, please call: Toll-free English and French inquiries: 1-800-337-7222 Teletypewriter (TTY): 1-800-263-7776 For electronic copies of this document, visit our website at www.ontario.ca/budget A printed copy of this publication can be ordered: Online: www.serviceontario.ca/publications By phone: ServiceOntario Contact Centre (Monday to Friday, 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM) Telephone: 416-326-5300 TTY: 416-325-3408 Toll-free across Canada: 1-800-668-9938 TTY Toll-free across Ontario: 1-800-268-7095 © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2018 ISBN 978-1-4868-1883-9 (Print) ISBN 978-1-4868-1884-6 (HTML) ISBN 978-1-4868-1885-3 (PDF) Ce document est disponible en français sous le titre : Budget de l’Ontario 2018 – Documents budgétaires Foreword A Plan for Care and Opportunity Ontario’s economy is performing well. This is largely due to the businesses and entrepreneurs who create jobs and to the women and men who get up each morning to go to the plant, or the office, or another place of work to make Ontario a more prosperous province. At the same time, the government has made strategic investments to support growth. Enhanced education, skills and training, new infrastructure, a competitive business environment and support for startups and small businesses are helping create good jobs. On the surface, the numbers tell a positive story: Our economy has outperformed those of all G7 nations since 2014; Our unemployment rate, at 5.5 per cent, is the lowest it has been in almost 20 years; and Last year alone, 500 net new jobs were created, on average, each day in Ontario, and they were mostly full‐time. -
Agenda Heritage and Museum Advisory Committee Meeting #6 Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 7:00 PM Municipal Office Council Chambers
Agenda Heritage and Museum Advisory Committee Meeting #6 Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 7:00 PM Municipal Office Council Chambers 1. Call to Order 2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest & Nature Thereof 3. Adoption of the Minutes i. Minutes of the 5th Regular Meeting of the Scugog Heritage and Museum Advisory Committee held May 16, 2017 Errors & Omissions: Recommendation: THAT the Minutes of the 5th Regular Meeting of the Scugog Heritage and Museum Advisory Committee held May 16, 2017 be adopted. 4. Business Arising Out of the Minutes 5. Deputation i. Doug Young - Property Owner David Brand – Developer Re: 234 Union Avenue ii. Sol-Arch Ltd. Jonathan Benczkowski Re: 289 North Street iii. Fraser Dimma – TENTATIVE Re: 221 Mary Street – Mueller Property To request an alternative accessible format, please contact the Clerks Department at 905-985-7346 6. Reports/Updates i. GBCA Architects RE: Borgal Report - Merits of Designating the Property at 221Mary Street ii. Township of Scugog – Peter Wokral RE: Township of Scugog’s Reply to Borgal Report 221 Mary Street Committee to review and forward a motion to Council to adjust or reaffirm the committee’s previously stated position regarding the above noted matter. iii. Erika Kohek – Township Staff RE: Draft Policy for Evaluation of Heritage Resources Committee to review and forward a motion to adopt or revise. iv. Erika Kohek – Township Staff RE: Adding Properties to the Register Committee to review and forward a motion to adopt or revise. v. Curator’s Report(s) Recommendation: THAT the reports prepared by the Curator dated June 20, 2017 be received for information. -
(BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016
Bolton Residential Expansion Study (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016 The purpose of this memorandum is to review the professional literature pertaining to the potential develop- ment of a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in the Bolton Residential Expansion Study area, in response to the Region of Peel’s recent release of the Discussion Paper. The Discussion Paper includes the establishment of evaluation themes and criteria, which are based on provincial and regional polices, stakeholder and public comments. It should be noted that while the Discussion Paper and the Region’s development of criteria does not specifi- cally advocate for TOD, it is the intent of this memorandum to illustrate that TOD-centric planning will not only adequately address such criteria, but will also complement and enhance the Region’s planning principles, key points and/or themes found in stakeholder and public comments. In the following are research findings related to TOD generally, and specifically, theMetrolinx Mobility Hub Guidelines For The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (September 2011) objectives. Additionally, following a review and assessment of the “Response to Comments Submitted on the Bolton Residential Expansion Study ROPA” submission prepared by SGL Planning & Design Inc. (March 15, 2016), this memorandum evaluates some of the key arguments and assumptions made in this submission relative to the TOD research findings. Planning for Transit-Oriented Developments TOD policy and programs can result in catalytic development that creates walkable, livable neighborhoods around transit providing economic, livability and equitable benefits. The body of research on TODs in the United States has shown that TODs are more likely to succeed when project planning takes place in conjunction with transit system expansion. -
Barrie Rail Corridor Expansion Project Transit Project Assessment
Barrie Rail Corridor Expansion Project Transit Project Assessment Process APPENDIX I Traffic Impact Analysis Environmental Project Report – August 8, 2017 In Association With 0HWUROLQ[%DUULH5DLO&RUULGRU([SDQVLRQ3URMHFW 7UDIILF,PSDFW$QDO\VLV5HSRUW±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
DTAH for the City of Toronto Dufferin Street Avenue Study Transportation Master Plan
DTAH for the City of Toronto Dufferin Street Avenue Study Transportation Master Plan Version 1 Final | January 15, 2015 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 232355-00 Arup Canada Inc 2 Bloor Street East Suite 2400 Toronto ON M4W 1A8 Canada www.arup.com DTAH for the City of Toronto Dufferin Street Avenue Study Transportation Master Plan Contents Page 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Organization of the TMP 1 1.2 Study and focus area 1 1.3 Environment assessment process 4 2 Background and policy context 7 2.1 Planning context 7 2.2 Regional context and strategic plans 8 2.3 Other plans 10 2.4 Local area characteristics 10 3 Public consultation 15 4 Existing transportation conditions 19 4.1 Regional network 19 4.2 Local street network 21 4.3 Vehicular operations 23 4.4 Transit 30 4.5 Cycling 33 4.6 Walking 35 5 Identified problems and opportunities 39 6 Guiding principles, guidelines and standards 41 6.1 Guiding principles 41 6.2 Recommended guidelines and standards 41 7 Integrated mobility strategies 45 7.1 Vehicular mobility strategy 45 7.2 Transit mobility strategy 47 7.3 Pedestrian mobility strategy 49 7.4 Cycling mobility strategy 49 8 Alternative land use options 53 8.1 Evaluation of land use options 55 8.2 Trip forecasting assumptions 55 Version 1 | Final | January 15, 2015 | Arup Canada Inc \\GLOBAL.ARUP.COM\AMERICAS\JOBS\TOR\230000\232355-00\4 INTERNAL -
GO Train Lakeshore East Extension Through Central Oshawa to Bowmanville
GO Train Lakeshore East Extension through Central Oshawa to Bowmanville Economic Impact Analysis April 2016 GO Train Lakeshore East Extension through Central Oshawa to Bowmanville Economic Impact Analysis Prepared for: dLAB, City of Oshawa, Municipality of Clarington and Community Partners Prepared by: Arup Suite 2400, 2 Bloor Street East, Toronto Ontario M4W 1A8 Phone: (416) 515-0915 [email protected] arup.com & Altus Group Economic Consulting 33 Yonge Street Toronto Ontario M5E 1G4 Phone: (416) 641-9500 Fax: (416) 641-9501 [email protected] altusgroup.com April 2016 April 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background ..............................................................................3 1.2 Approach .................................................................................6 2 ECONOMIC OVERVIEW ....................................................................... 10 2.1 Employment Growth ...........................................................11 2.2 Population Growth ...............................................................17 2.3 Conclusions ...........................................................................24 3 COMMUNITY ECONOMIC IMPACT OF GO LAKESHORE EAST EXTENSION .............................................................................................. 26 3.1 Improved Access to Labour, Markets and Clients ...........26 3.2 Benefits to Post Secondary Institutions .............................28 -
Agreement with Metrolinx for Rutherford Road/Barrie GO Transit Rail Grade Separation City of Vaughan
The Regional Municipality of York Committee of the Whole Transportation Services November 7, 2019 Report of the Commissioner of Transportation Services Agreement with Metrolinx for Rutherford Road/Barrie GO Transit Rail Grade Separation City of Vaughan 1. Recommendations 1. Council authorize entering into an agreement with Metrolinx for the construction and maintenance of the Rutherford Road (Y.R. 73)/Barrie GO rail grade separation in the City of Vaughan, in accordance with the principles outlined in Attachment 1. 2. Council approve advancing the budget for the Region’s portion of Rutherford Road (Y.R 73)/Barrie GO rail grade separation, in the amount of $13.7 million. 2. Summary This report seeks Council approval to enter into an agreement with Metrolinx for the construction and maintenance of a new road/rail grade separation at the existing level crossing of Rutherford Road and the Barrie GO rail tracks, as shown on Attachment 2. Key Points: Rutherford Road from Westburne Drive/Barrhill Road to Confederation Parkway/Peter Rupert Avenue will be widened from four to six lanes and will cross underneath the Barrie GO rail tracks Metrolinx has awarded a $239 million fixed-price contract to EllisDon Infrastructure Transit to design, build and finance the Rutherford GO Station improvements and grade separation The Region’s contribution is $13.7 million for the grade separation 1 3. Background GO Expansion service enhancements along the Barrie and Stouffville GO rail corridors will provide more frequent and convenient travel options for residents Metrolinx is implementing all-day service on the Barrie and Stouffville GO rail corridors in York Region. -
Metrolinx Regional Express Rail - Barrie Rail Corridor Expansion Update City-Wide
~'TVAUG HAN JUL 1 3 Z016 July 4, 2016 Mr. Denis Kelly, Regional Clerk The Regional Municipality of York 17250 Yonge Street Newmarket, ON L3Y 6Z1 Dear Mr. Kelly: RE: METROLINX REGIONAL EXPRESS RAIL - BARRIE RAIL CORRIDOR EXPANSION UPDATE CITY-WIDE Attached for your information is Item 28, Report No. 27, of the Committee of the Whole regarding the above-noted matter which was adopted, as amended, by the Council of the City of Vaughan at its meeting of June 28, 2016. In dealing with this matter, the City of Vaughan Council requests the following: 1. THAT Council formally requests that Metrolinx and the Region of York support efforts to improve the strategic, economic, financial and operations case for the Highway 7 - Concord station through the Concord GO Centre Mobility Hub and Transportation studies, in support of the later inclusion of the Highway 7 - Concord station in the GO RER 10 Year program or in a subsequent implementation phase; 2. THAT Council formally requests that Metrolinx and the Region of York support efforts to advance the implementation of Kirby station; 3. THAT Metrolinx be requested to implement a comprehensive communication plan for RER Implementation in consultation with City staff which may include public meetings; 4. THAT Council formally request that Metrolinx and the Region of York work with City Staff to identify immediate short term Station Parking and Access solutions at the Rutherford and Maple GO stations to address current parking and station access pressure; and 5. THAT Metrolinx and the Region be requested to include consideration for additional grade separation crossings on Vaughan roads, specifically, McNaughton, Rivermede and Kirby Road, as part of RER implementation. -
2020 Transit Initiatives PEF
Overview 2 Annual Plan Process 3 Overview of Initiatives • Frequent Transit Network (FTN) • 2019-2022 Budget Reductions • Viva Service Changes • Conventional Service Changes • On-Demand Service Changes 4 Frequent Transit Network (FTN) • The FTN will provide frequent and reliable service along key corridors in the urban areas of the Region • A network operating at a 15-minute frequency (or better) all day, seven days a week • Initial phase includes 15-minute service during weekday rush hours only 5 Frequent Transit Network (FTN) Existing Rush Hour Proposed Rush Hour Routes Frequency (minutes) Frequency (minutes) 2 – Milliken 23-29 18-24 3 – Thornhill 30 25 16 – 16th Avenue 30 24 20/20B – Jane* 14 14 25 – Major Mackenzie 33-44 26-27 50 – Queensway 44 35 88/88B – Bathurst** 15 15 Note: Frequencies are approximated *Route 20/20B – Jane frequency increases planned for Saturday and Sunday/holiday service **Route 88/88B – Bathurst frequency increases planned for Saturday service 6 Frequent Transit Network (FTN) Route 2 – Milliken Proposed Service Changes: Existing Routing • As per the FTN, improve frequency during morning and afternoon rush hours Impacts/Improvements: • Morning rush hour frequency improved from 23 to approximately 18 minutes • Afternoon rush hour frequency improved from 29 to approximately 24 minutes Implementation Date: • January 2020 7 Frequent Transit Network (FTN) Route 3 – Thornhill Proposed Service Changes: Existing Routing • As per the FTN, improve frequency during morning and afternoon rush hours Impacts/Improvements: -
Shantz Aaron.Pdf (7.260Mb)
Understanding Factors Associated With Commuter Rail Ridership A Demand Elasticity Study of the GO Transit Rail Network by Aaron Shantz A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Environmental Studies in Planning Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2021 © Aaron Shantz 2021 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that this thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract Mode share in major North American cities is currently dominated by private automobile use. Planners have theorized that transitioning commuter rail systems to regional rail networks is a viable method to increase ridership and stabilize mode share. This process is currently underway in Ontario, Canada, as the amount and frequency of service is being increased throughout the GO Transit rail network via the GO Expansion Program. However, previous studies have shown that transit demand does not solely respond to service quantity expansions. Variables related to the built environment, regional economy, network characteristics, and socioeconomic status of the customer base can influence transit demand to varying degrees. Further, the literature states that the travel behavior of commuter rail users is unique, as access mode, distance, socioeconomic status, and the utility derived from varying trip types can differ compared to local transit users. These findings suggest that supplementary policies might be needed to reduce automobile reliance and stimulate demand for regional transit. Many transit researchers have conducted demand elasticity studies to identify what factors are significantly associated with transit ridership.