DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 1 New Breaks1 in Diplomatic Relations, 1976-89

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 1 New Breaks1 in Diplomatic Relations, 1976-89 Appendix 1 New Breaks1 in Diplomatic Relations, 1976-89 States (initiating state listed first) Date of /Jreak Date ofrestoration 1976 Iceland-Britain February June 1976 Morocco-Algeria March May 1988 Mauritania-Algeria March August 1979 USA-Equatorial Guinea March November 19792 Iran-Cuba April August 1979 Angola-Portugal May June 1978 Egypt-Syria June October 1976 Mauritius-Israel July Britain-Uganda July Apri11979 Sudan-Libya July February 1978 Venezuela-Uruguay July March 1985 1977 Taiwan-Liberia February Spain-Equatorial Guinea March August 1979 Zaire-Cuba April August 1979 Zaire-East Germany May January 1979 Guatemala-Panama May August 1979 Ghana-Uganda May Mauritania-North Korea May North Yemen-Portugal June 3 Argentina-North Korea June Ethiopia-Somalia September April1988 Somalia-USSR November 1986 Somalia-Cuba November 1989 Cambodia-Vietnam December June 19'79 Egypt-Algeria December 1988 Egypt-Iraq December 1987 Egypt-Libya December Egypt-Syria December 1989 Egypt-South Yemen December 1988 1978 Benin-Gabon January February 1989 Gabon-Chad 134 New Breaks in Diplomatic &lations 135 Panama-South Africa Ethiopia-Tunisia 1988 Egypt-Cyprus February April 1984 Iran-Kenya February September 1982 Chad-Libya February February 1978 Bolivia-Chile March North Yemen-South Yemen July March 1979 Laos-France August December 1981 Libya-Taiwan September Afghanistan-South Korea September Costa Rica-Nicaragua November May 1986 USA-Taiwan December Bulgaria-Egypt December 1984 1979 Grenada-South Korea 1984 Morocco-Ethiopia March Iran-South Africa March Sudan-Iraq April 1982 Iran-Egypt April March 1991 Bahrain-Egypt April 1987 Jordan-Egypt April 1984 Kuwait-Egypt April 1987 Lebanon-Egypt April June 1989 Mauritania-Egypt April 1987 Morocco-Egypt April 1987 Qatar-Egypt April 1987 Saudi Arabia-Egypt April 1987 Tunisia-Egypt April January 1988 United Arab Emirates-Egypt April 1987 North Yemen-Egypt April 1987 Djibouti-Egypt April 1986 Mexico-Nicaragua May August 1979 Ecuador-Nicaragua June August 1979 Panama-Nicaragua June August 1979 Grenada-Nicaragua June August 1979 Brazil-Nicaragua June Apri11981 Peru-Nicaragua June August 1979 Senegal-Central African Republic July Uganda-Central African Republic August El Salvador-South Africa November Britain-Cambodia December _4 1980 Tunisia-Libya January March 1988 Central African Republic-Libya January September 1982 Central African Republic-USSR April March 1988 Central African Republic-Cuba January Spain-Guatemala February September 1985 136 Appendix 1 Iran-Israel February Colombia-Taiwan February USA-Iran April Morocco-Cuba April Morocco-Libya April June 1981 Seychelles-South Korea May Ecuador-Bolivia5 July November 1981 USA-Bolivia July October 1981 Venezuela-Bolivia July November 1981 Panama-Bolivia July November 1981 Sweden-Bolivia July July 1982 Netherlands-Bolivia July September 1982 Canada-Bolivia July August 1988 Senegal-Libya July November 1988 Bolivia-Nicaragua August October 1982 Iran-Chile August Apri11991 Cuba-Venezuela September March 1989 Paraguay-Nicaragua October February 1991 Saudi Arabia-Libya October December 1981 Iraq-North Korea October Iraq-Libya October September 1987 Gambia-Libya October December 1984 Ghana-Libya November March 1982 1981 Niger-Libya January 1987 Benin-Chad February 1989 Iran-Morocco February Jordan-Iran February January 1991 Mauritania-Morocco March 1985 Colombia-Cuba March July1991 Costa Rica-Cuba March Saudi Arabia-Mghanistan April USA-Libya6 May Sudan-Libya June April1985 Somalia-Libya August April1985 Guatemala-Britain September 1986 Jamaica-Cuba October July 1990 1982 Sierra Leone-Libya 1989 Britain-Argentina April February 1990 New Zealand-Argentina April August 1984 Syria-Iraq April Kuwait-Costa Rica May Saudi Arabia-Costa Rica May Bangladesh-Zaire May Kuwait-Zaire May 1986 Libya-Zaire May October 1988 New Breaks in Diplomatic Relations 137 Qatar-Zaire May Saudi Arabia-Zaire May United Arab Emirates-Zaire May Chad-Libya June October 1988 Sudan-Iran June December 1986 Nicaragua-Israel August 1983 Libya-Lebanon May March 1984 Lesotho-Taiwan May Apri11990 Lesotho-South Korea June February 1986 Dominica-Grenada October 1984 Jamaica-Grenada October 1984 Lebanon-Iran November July 1984 Burma-North Korea November 1984 Mauritius-Libya January Mauritania-Libya 1985 Senegal-Iran January February 19897 Jordan-Libya February 1987 Grenada-Cuba March Britain-Libya April Somalia-E) Salvador April Egypt-E) Salvador April Egypt-Costa Rica April Bangladesh-Costa Rica April Jordan-Costa Rica April Malaysia-Costa Rica April Morocco-Costa Rica April September 1986 Lebanon-Costa Rica May Lebanon-E) Salvador May Libya-Liberia May November 1988 Grenada-North Korea June September 1991 Kuwait-Liberia August Bangladesh-Liberia August South Yemen-Libya September 19878 Morocco-Yugoslavia November July 1988 1985 Grenada-North Korea January Iraq-Libya June 1987 Taiwan-Bolivia July Liberia-USSR July May 1987 Tunisia-Libya September 1987 Morocco-India October October 1988 Ecuador-Nicaragua October August 1988 Liberia-Sierra Leone November July 1986 Taiwan-Nicaragua December 138 Appendix 1 1986 Argentina-South Mrica May Costa Rica-South Mrica July Syria-Morocco July 1989 Britain-Syria October November 1990 1987 United Arab Emirates-Libya January Tunisia-Iran March September 1990 Australia-Libya May 9 Mauritania-Iran June October 1990 France-Iran July 1988 Iran-Iraq October October 1990 Kenya-Libya December 1988 Japan-North Korea January Taiwan-Uruguay February Saudi Arabia-Iran April April 1991 1989 Iran-Britain March September 1990 Uganda-Zaire April September 1989 Burundi-Libya April Central Mrican Republic-Sudan May September 1989 Senegal-Mauritania August April1992 Paraguay-Panama October March 1990 El Salvador-Nicaragua November February 1990 China-Liberia November Key: in second column, month of break not known; in third column, absence of evidence that relations restored by 1990 - evidence that relations definitely not restored by 1990. Notes: l. Includes 'temporary suspensions' for political reasons. 2. The subsequent announcement of the 'expulsion' of US diplomats from Equatorial Guinea had little effect as the US ambassador and most of the embassy staff were based in Cameroon. 3. Relations had not been restored before unification of the Yemen Arab Republic and the People's Democratic Republic of Yemen. 4. Britain had not had a presence in Cambodia since March 1975, and no resident ambassador since 1974. 5. Following the military coup in Bolivia in July 1980, Ecuador withheld recognition from the new regime and withdrew its embassy. The other six countries listed immediately below Ecuador in this column also withheld recognition, though they kept their embassies in place. 6. The United States had 'suspended' diplomatic relations with Libya in early Decem­ ber 1979 but retained ten staff in its Tripoli mission. These were reduced to two in early February 1980 and on 2 May the embassy in Libya was closed altogether. On 6 May all remaining Libyan diplomats were ordered to leave the United States, New Breaks in Diplomatic Relations 139 though the State Department announced that the move stopped just short of breaking diplomatic relations. 7. Senegal ordered Iran to close its embassy in Dakar, but did not formally break rela­ tions and continued to maintain an embassy in Iran. B. South Yemen ordered the Libyan embassy to close but continued to maintain a presence in Libya. 9. Australia closed the Libyan bureau but continued to maintain some contact through its embassy in Italy. Sourr£.<;; Keesing\ Contemjmmry Archiveo~/Keesing's Record of World Events, 1975-93; Europa World Yearbook, 1975-93; l\umjm regional surveys; Afriw Contemporary Record, 1975-89; Africa Rr.searr,h /Julletin, 1976-92; The Times (various issues); Financial Times (various issues); The Guardian (various issues); The Economist (various issues); The Far Eastern 1\mnmnic Review (various issues); The DijJlomalic Service List (British); and The London DijJlomatic Ust. Appendix 2 Funerals, 1945-93 Death Funeral Franklin D. Roosevelt* 12 April 1945 15 April Mahatma Gandhi* 30January 1948 31January Mohammed AliJinnah* 11 September 1948 12 September James V. Forrestalt 21 May 1949 25 May ]. C. Smuts 11 September 1950 16 September Liaquat Ali Khan* 16 October 1951 17 October King George VI 6 February 1952 15 February Joseph Stalin* 5 March 1953 9 March King Ibn Saud* 9 November 1953 9 November Pope Pius XII* 9 October 1958 19 October1 John Foster Dullest 24 May 1959 27 May Dag Hammarskjold 17 September 1961 29 September ]. F. Kennedy* 22 November 1963 25 November PopeJohn XXIII* 3June 1963 6June General Douglas MacArthur 5 April1964 11 April Jawaharlal Nehru* 27 May 1964 28 May Herbert C. Hoover 20 October 1964 25 October Winston Churchill 24January 1965 30January Adlai Stevenson t 14July 1965 19 July Lal Bahadur Shastri* llJanuary 1966 12January Konrad Adenauer 19 April1967 25 April Harold Holt* 17 December 1967 22 December Dwight D. Eisenhower 28 March 1969 2 April HoChi Minh* 3 September 1969 9 September Gamel Abdul Nasser* 28 September 1970 1 October Charles de Gaulle 9 November 1970 12 November2 Harry S. Truman 26 December 1972 28 December Georges Pompidou* 2 April1974 4April Archbishop Makarios* 3 August 1977 8August Jomo Kenyatta* 22 August 1978 31 August Houari Boumedienne* 27 December 1978 29 December Lord Louis Mountbatten 27 August 1979 5 September President Tito* 4 May 1980 8May Masayoshi Ohira* 12June 1980 14June Seretse Khama* 13July 1980 24July~ Anwar Sadat* 6 October 1981 10 October King Khaled* 13 June
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Civil Supremacy of the Military in Namibia: an Evolutionary Perspective
    ~f Civil Supremacy of the Military in Namibia: An Evolutionary Perspective By Guy Lamb Department of Political Studies University of Cape Town December 1998 Town Cape of . ·-~\,1.~ l ~ -._/ I /- -....,,._,.,---, University r/ / ~ This dissertation is for the partial fulfillment for a Master of Social Sciences (International and Comparative Politics). The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University Town Cape of University Table of Contents Page Abstract i Maps ii Acknowledgements VI List of Acronyms viI Introduction 1 Civil Supremacy in Namibia: An Evolution? 1 Civil Supremacy and its Importance 2 Focus on Namibia 4 · Why Namibia? 5 Chapter 1: The Historical Evolution of Civil Supremacy: A 6 Conceptual Approach Town 1.1 Introducing the Problem 6 1.2 Civil-Military Relations: Survey of the Discipline and 7 Review of the Literature Cape 1.2.1 Civil-Military Relations as a Field of Study 7 1.2.2 Review of Civil Military Relationsof Literature 8 1.2.3 Focus on Civil Supremacy 11 1.3 What is Civil Supremacy? 12 1.3.1 An Overview of Civil Supremacy 12 1.3.2 A Question of Bias 13 1.4 Civil Military Traditions 14 1.4.1 Colonial 14 1.4.2 Revolutionary/Insurgent 15 1.4.2.1 The InfluenceUniversity of Mao Tse-tung
    [Show full text]
  • Than Neighbors New Developments in the Institutional Strengthening of Mexico’S Armed Forces in the Context of U.S.-Mexican Military Cooperation
    More than Neighbors New Developments in the Institutional Strengthening of Mexico’s Armed Forces in the Context of U.S.-Mexican Military Cooperation By Iñigo Guevara February 2018 More than Neighbors New Developments in the Institutional strengthening of Mexico’s armed forces in the context of US-Mexican Military Cooperation By Iñigo Guevara “With Mexico, very, very strong, quiet military-to-military relations” … … “This is a relationship that has been many decades in the making. Just go back - just for an example - go back to World War II. It doesn't start with us. It will not end with us.” -U.S. Defense Secretary Jim Mattis1 Strategic Reasoning for Closer U.S. –Mexico Military Ties Despite the deep cultural and economic diversity of North America’s 486+ million inhabitants, the interconnectedness of the three countries means that they all face, to various degrees, the same threats, which range from serious to existential. Existential threats have long been narrowed to a nuclear war with Russia, to a much lesser degree China, and the now aspiring North Korea. The lack of an existential threat from the south has meant that Mexico was not a priority for the U.S. defense community. Mexico’s non-interventionist interior-looking foreign policy, the lack of an external threat, and an extremely complex politico-military relationship also meant that the defense relationship with the United States was cordial, but distant over several decades. Since the 1980’s, the Mexican Navy and Air Force did source their token conventional fighting capacity from the United States: a squadron of tactical jet fighters and a flotilla of second-hand destroyers and frigates; however, this was mainly out of convenience rather than a strategic decision to develop binational defense ties.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy As a Fortuitous By-Product of Independence UN Intervention and Democratization in Namibia
    Taiwan Journal of Democracy, Volume 5, No.1: 27-50 Democracy as a Fortuitous By-product of Independence UN Intervention and Democratization in Namibia Christof Hartmann Abstract Democratization of Namibia was a more or less fortuitous by-product of independence. Universal suffrage was the rallying cry in the racially dominated system of South African Apartheid rule in Namibia because it equalled independence. It was thus the participatory aspect of democracy which allowed the acceptance of a liberal constitution and a set of democratic institutions. Independence meant that the armed liberation movement simply took over the state. External UN intervention was still crucial in creating a level playing ground for the first free and fair elections. UNTAG success was helped by a clear Chapter VI mandate, decisive leadership, a thinly populated country, and a South African administration which was no longer controlled by hardliners. International negotiations over Resolution 435 started fifteen years before their implementation, and international actors were integral to keeping the parties to its promises. External actors thus played a major and supporting role in the background. Key words: Namibia, independence, democratization, South Africa, UNTAG. There was a time when the promotion of democracy after civil wars seemed to be a manageable task. It was a time in the early 1990s when the United Nations was believed to finally assume its role as a powerful promoter of peace and security and to be able to shape the political destiny of populations toward a peaceful co-existence; this included the right to democratic governance. The UN experience in Namibia was partly responsible for this euphoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognition in International Law: a Functional Reappraisalt
    Recognition in International Law: A Functional Reappraisalt The ambiguous nature of the doctrine of recognition in international law has contributed to significant academic dispute.1 At least two major theories have been advanced to provide a framework for this part of international law. The "constitutive theory" views recognition as the voluntary act of the recognizing state; the "declaratory theory" accepts recognition as automatic.2 Recognition has both legal and political meanings, both internal and external consequences for the recognizing state.3 The law which applies in one set of circumstances may not necessarily apply in another. In strictly public international law acceptance of a declaratory theory re- quiring immediate admission of the fact of existence of a foreign state seems necessary. If, however, domestic legal issues are also involved, a state may legitimately impose other conditions of its own law and policy, resulting in the operation of some elements of a constitutive standard. Such a distinction can readily be discerned within the existing law. It is consistent both with the maintenance of international order and with the protection of domestic legal integrity. I. CLARIFICATION OF TERMINOLOGY A restricted vocabulary has been used to describe a large quantity of concepts. One distinction traditionally made in the literature is that between recognition of a state and recognition of a government. In the traditional jurisprudence the state is the unit or persona of interna- tional law which is capable of holding rights within the system. 4 A new t Fred L. Morrison, A.B. 1961, University of Kansas; B.A. 1963, Oxford University; M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Two Revolutions: Cultural Relations Between Mexico and Cuba*
    Jahrbuch für Geschichte Lateinamerikas Anuario de Historia de América Latina 54 | 2017 | 108-128 Amelia M. Kiddle University of Calgary Between Two Revolutions Cultural Relations between Mexico and Cuba Except where otherwise noted, this article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) https://doi.org/10.15460/jbla.54.23 Between Two Revolutions: * Cultural Relations between Mexico and Cuba Amelia M. Kiddle Abstract. - This article examines the role that Revolutionary Mexican foreign policy played within Mexican and Cuban society through an analysis of the 1938 voyage to Havana of the Brigada Mexicana and the 1939 visit to Mexico of Colonel Fulgencio Batista. These goodwill missions contributed to Mexican and Cuban state formation. In the Mexican case, the goodwill mission created domestic support by providing evidence of international support for the oil expropriation of 1938, and in the Cuban case, it provided legitimacy to the Batista regime by demonstrating affinity with the Mexican Revolution. While visiting Mexico in 1939, Batista witnessed the commemoration of the Constitution of 1917. Although he may not have been influenced to emulate its radical content in the Cuban Constitution of 1940, the two documents came to carry tremendous symbolic weight in the populist politics of both countries. Keywords: Goodwill; Foreign Relations; Cultural Relations; Mexico; Cuba; Lázaro Cárdenas; Fulgencio Batista. Resumen. Este artículo examina el papel que la política exterior del México Revolucionario jugó en las sociedades mexicana y cubana a través de un análisis del viaje de la Brigada Mexicana a La Habana en 1938 y la visita de Fulgencio Batista a México en 1939.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mexican Foreign Policy Tradition
    Fauriol: DIFFERING PERCEPTIONS IN FOREIGN POLICY AND SECURITY: The Mexican DIFFERING PERCEPTIONS IN FOREIGN POLICY AND SECURITY THE MEXICAN FOREIGN POLICY TRADITION Dr. Georges Fauriol* INTRODUCTION Mexico's foreign policy is quite unique. More than any other large country, the Mexican tradition has been to renounce the un- stated assumptions of "power politics." In its place, twentieth cen- tury Mexican decision makers have substituted a defensive foreign policy distilled from their ideology, prudent self-interest and their national experience. In the late 1980s, this has begun to slowly change. Oil, financial crises, tension at Mexico's northern and southern borders, and domestic unrest have altered Mexico's inter- action with the world. It is unclear whether this has altered Mex- ico's perception of its own interests. Mexico's position and participation in international politics thus defies easy categorization. The issue is not whether it has the means to enter the ranks of powerful nations. Mexico is already a signifi- cant nation whose sense of nationalism confirms that. The question is how Mexico will face its overwhelming problems. Positioned to take off industrially with its resources, energy, and growing tech- nology Mexico is an upwardly mobile nation. The global petroleum economy has brought a new challenge to Mexico, that is now forc- ing major choices on Mexican policy. Even with the potential for being a modern state, Mexico does not appear to have the national self-confidence and attendant interests for even regional power aspi- rations. In strategic terms, Mexico has the foundation to become a powerful nation, but appears reluctant to accept the responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventh Report on Unilateral Acts of States, by Mr. Víctor Rodríguez Cedeño, Special Rapporteur [Original: English/French/Spanish] [22 April 2004]
    UNILATERAL ACTS OF STATES [Agenda item 5] DOCUMENT A/CN.4/542*1 Seventh report on unilateral acts of States, by Mr. Víctor Rodríguez Cedeño, Special Rapporteur [Original: English/French/Spanish] [22 April 2004] CONTENTS Page Multilateral instruments cited in the present report ..................................................................................................................................... 207 Works cited in the present report ................................................................................................................................................................. 208 Paragraphs INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 1–12 211 Chapter I. ACTS AND DECLARATIONS THAT MAY REPRESENT THE PRACTICE OF STATES................................................................................................. 13–201 212 A. Acts whereby States assume obligations .................................................................................................................................... 13–79 212 B. Acts by which a State waives a right or a legal claim................................................................................................................. 80–88 232 C. Acts by which a State reaffirms a right or a legal claim ............................................................................................................. 89–178
    [Show full text]
  • The Cardenas Doctrine and Twentieth-Century Mexican Foreign Policy
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1974 The aC rdenas Doctrine and Twentieth-Century Mexican Foreign Policy. Jerry Edwin Tyler Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Tyler, Jerry Edwin, "The aC rdenas Doctrine and Twentieth-Century Mexican Foreign Policy." (1974). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 2768. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/2768 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. t INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolutions of the Forty-Ninth Ordinary Session of the Council of Ministers As Adopted by the Council of Ministers
    ORGANIZATION OF ORGANISATION DE L’UNITE AFRICAN UNITY AFRICAINE Secretariat Secretariat P.O. Box 3243 B. P. 3243 Addis Ababa COUNCIL OF MINISTERS CM/Res.1177 – 1205 Forty-ninth Ordinary Session 20 – 25 February, 1989 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia RESOLUTIONS OF THE FORTY-NINTH ORDINARY SESSION OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS AS ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS TABLE OF CONTENTS No. TITLE REFERENCE 1. Resolution on Namibia CM/Res.1177 (XLIX) 2. Resolution on South Africa CM/Res.1178 (XLIX) 3. Resolution against Military and Nuclear Collaboration with Apartheid South Africa CM/Res.1179 (XLIX) 4. Resolution on the Candidature of His Excellency Major-General Joseph Hanven Garba for the post of President of the Forty-fourth Session of the United Nations General Assembly CM/Res.1180 (XLIX) 5. International Conference on the Plight of Refugees, Returnees and Displaced Persons in Southern Africa CM/Res.1181 (XLIX) 6. Resolution on the Situation in the Middle East CM/Res.1182 (XLIX) 7. Resolution on the Question of Palestine CM/Res.1183 (XLIX) 8. Resolution on the Western Sahara CM/Res.1184 (XLIX) 9. Resolution on the People’s Republic of Angola CM/Res.1185 (XLIX) 10. Vote of Thanks to the People’s Republic of the Congo CM/Res.1186 (XLIX) 11. Resolution on the Programme and Budget for the Financial Year 1989/90 CM/Res.1187 (XLIX) 12. Resolution on Preparations for the Third General Conference of UNIDO and Ninth Meeting of the Conference of African Ministers of Industry (CAMI) CM/Res.1188 (XLIX) 13. Resolution on the Candidature of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • South African Foreign Relations with Angola
    SOUTH AFRICAN FOREIGN RELATIONS WITH ANGOLA, 1975 - 1988: A STRUCTURAL REALIST PERSPECTIVE by L.J.D. Devraun Thesis submittedUniversity in fulfilment of Cape of the requirements Town for the degree of Masters of Arts in International Relations in the Department of Political Studies at the University of Cape Town Cape Town Republic of South Africa September 1996 ~o:·•;:r.~c-.7".""-.x-·-..,··:;r.·,·,....-·-··c-:-;;-:e:r,.-::=-~ t~ Tht·: f?1·: ·r ... ,... ~{,· ri' ri·. · ·r,.-,.•:-, }.,_."~ !\··2-n ni"·nn ~ ~th~:;;;_·;~!_,:~:) .i::i~:i~·:\>.,.:,f:~>'.:;,~~.~---'_:1 _.·?;:~:~ ~ I or lfl r--·"· C,1,.•/ ';-;,h !,, ·---U ,_.,, .-.,.,.,.,r. ~ ·)~..);".:,.::.· :._-.·-~..,.,..- ;;,,";~,-~·;·t.• :,$>1'~·~-·."f·:--· •n.~w.... ·; ,,'•'•: The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town SOUTH AFRICA IN ANGOLA 1975 -1988 Copyright (1996) by L.J.D. Devraun D.D.D. to my Russian forbearers ABSTRACT: There are an enormous number of competing interpretations of South Africa's apartheid era policies both in the region and towards Angola. With South Africa's role in the Angolan civil war as its case study, this paper evaluates the relative utility of certain selected approaches to international relations theory. This paper evaluates the relative utility of system level versus unit level theories to explain the nature of South African involvement in the Angolan conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.62 YEARS of INDONESIA-MEXICO DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS: SOME REFLECTIONS and WAYS FORWARD
    Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad ISSN: 1909-3063 [email protected] Universidad Militar Nueva Granada Colombia Sjahril Sabaruddin, Sulthon; División de Estudios Internacionales Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas 62 YEARS OF INDONESIA-MEXICO DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS: SOME REFLECTIONS AND WAYS FORWARD Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad, vol. 12, núm. 2, julio- diciembre, 2017, pp. 287-323 Universidad Militar Nueva Granada Bogotá, Colombia Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=92751348013 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative REVISTA - Bogotá (Colombia) Vol. 12 N.° 2 - Julio-diciembre 287 rev.relac.int.estrateg.segur.11(1):287-323,2017 62 YEARS OF INDONESIA-MEXICO DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS: SOME REFLECTIONS AND WAYS FORWARD* Sulthon Sjahril Sabaruddin** & División de Estudios Internacionales Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas*** * This research was developed with the support of the Agencia Mexicana de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo, Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores (AMEXCID SRE) for the Special Program - Visiting Professor 2015 Scholarships. This paper represents the opinion of the author, and is the product of professional research. It is not meant to represent the position or opinion of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for the Republic of Indonesia. Any errors are the fault of the author. ** Diplomatic Official (Charge d’Affaires), Embassy of the Republic of Indonesia in Sana’a. Doctorate in Economics, Universitas Indonesia. Dr. Sabaruddin actually works in the Center for Policy Analysis and Development on American and European Regions - Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia in Jalan Taman Pejambon http://dx.doi.
    [Show full text]
  • April 28, 1989 Joint Press Statement on Namibia
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified April 28, 1989 Joint Press Statement on Namibia Citation: “Joint Press Statement on Namibia,” April 28, 1989, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Reproduced from Namibia Communications Center. Included in "Southern Africa in the Cold War, Post-1974," edited by Sue Onslow and Anna-Mark Van Wyk. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/118292 Summary: Press release describing a tripartite meeting between delegations from Angola, South Africa, and Cuba about troop withdrawal from Namibia. South African and SWAPO forces are restricted to their respective bases. Credits: This document was made possible with support from the Leon Levy Foundation. Original Language: English Contents: English Transcription Joint Press Statement The Third Regular Meeting of the Joint Commission established in terms of the Brazzaville Protocol of 13 December 1988, took place in Cape Town, Republic of South Africa from 27 to 28 April 1989. Delegations of the Peoples’ Republic of Angola, the Republic of Cuba and the Republic of South Africa, the members of the Joint Commission, as well as the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the United States of America, as observers, attended the meeting. During the course of the discussions it was decided to invite the Special Representative of the Secretary-General of the United Nations in Namibia, the Under-Secretary-General for Special Political Affairs and the Military Commander of UNTAG to attend the meeting. A similar invitation was extended to the Administrator General of the Territory. The Joint Commission considered that the presence of these officials would facilitate its work.
    [Show full text]