COOK ISLANDS INVASIVE SPECIES EARLY DETECTION & RAPID RESPONSE PLAN Feb 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

COOK ISLANDS INVASIVE SPECIES EARLY DETECTION & RAPID RESPONSE PLAN Feb 2018 COOK ISLANDS INVASIVE SPECIES EARLY DETECTION & RAPID RESPONSE PLAN Feb 2018 1 Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 4 List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Managing Early Detection and Rapid Response ..................................................................................... 5 Section 1: Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Scope ....................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Plans for different invasive species ......................................................................................... 9 1.3 Linkages to other plans ......................................................................................................... 11 1.4 Plan structure ........................................................................................................................ 13 Section 2: Early Detection. ................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Species of highest risk to Cook Islands ................................................................................. 14 2.3 Active Detection - proposed surveillance programmes ....................................................... 16 2.3.1 Fruit flies .............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3.2 Invasive ants ......................................................................................................................... 16 2.3.3 Mosquitoes that are vectors of human disease .................................................................. 16 2.3.4 Marine invasive species at international ports .................................................................... 17 2.3.5 Site-specific surveillance – Suwarrow National Park ........................................................... 17 2.4 Passive detection - proposed public awareness programmes ............................................. 17 2.4.1 Identification of high-risk pathways .................................................................................... 17 2.4.2 Awareness material for high-risk pathways ......................................................................... 19 2.4.3 Education ............................................................................................................................. 20 2.4.4 Reporting systems – ‘Pest Alert’ ......................................................................................... 20 2.5 Completion of Early Detection .............................................................................................. 21 Section 3: Rapid Response .................................................................................................................... 22 1. INVESTIGATION PHASE ................................................................................................................. 23 1.1 Responding to report and identification ..................................................................................... 23 1.2 Verification of identification ....................................................................................................... 27 1.3 Informing others ......................................................................................................................... 28 1.4 Special cases when identification begins the response .............................................................. 28 2. ALERT PHASE ................................................................................................................................. 29 2.1 Review – pest assessment .......................................................................................................... 29 2.2 Rapid Assessment of infestation ................................................................................................. 30 2 2.3 Contain ........................................................................................................................................ 31 2.4 Notify........................................................................................................................................... 31 2.4.1 Emergency Management Cook Islands (EMCI) .................................................................... 31 2.4.2 Local constituencies ............................................................................................................. 32 2.4.3 CROP Agencies ..................................................................................................................... 32 2.4.4 NGO’s ................................................................................................................................... 32 2.4.5 Trading partners (if required) .............................................................................................. 32 2.5 Assess feasibility of eradication .................................................................................................. 32 3. OPERATIONAL RESPONSE PHASE .................................................................................................. 33 3.1 Develop Response Plan ............................................................................................................... 33 3.1.1 Establish technical methodology ......................................................................................... 34 3.1.2 Establish staffing and management structure ..................................................................... 34 3.1.3 Review the legislative basis for the operation. .................................................................... 37 3.1.4 Establish communication strategy ....................................................................................... 37 3.1.5 Review and sign-off plan ...................................................................................................... 37 3.2 Implement Response ........................................................................................................... 37 3.2.1 Obtain the necessary resources and establish the necessary administration ..................... 37 3.2.2 Secure regional assistance with technical expertise and funding ....................................... 37 4. STAND-DOWN PHASE ................................................................................................................... 38 5. RECOVERY PHASE .......................................................................................................................... 39 References ............................................................................................................................................ 40 Annex 1: Priority invasive plant species for exclusion from Cook Islands ........................................ 41 Annex 2: Information sources for local identification ...................................................................... 42 Key Websites ................................................................................................................................. 42 Annex 3: Local Contacts for Pest & Disease Identification ............................................................... 43 Annex 4: International Contacts for Pest Identification ................................................................... 44 Annex 5: OIE-listed diseases ............................................................................................................. 45 Annex 6: Disinfection protocol for plant diseases ............................................................................ 46 Annex 7: Incursion Response Simulation Exercise 2016 .................................................................. 47 Annex 8: Fruitfly Emergency Response Plan ..................................................................................... 55 3 Acknowledgements Akameitaki’anga i te katoatoa tei piri mai e tei oronga mai, i to ratou au manako no te tata’anga i teia parani. Teia parani, e au ravenga teia no te parūrū i te Kuki Airani mei tetai uatu tu katiri kikino te ka riro, ei tāmanamanatā i to tatou Ao Ora Natura, ta tatou ravenga kimi moni e to tatou ora’anga tangata. This plan was developed by the National Environment Service (NES) in partnership with the Biosecurity Service and the Ministry of Agriculture, in liaison with the Ministry of Health – Community Health Services, Ministry of Marine Resources and Ports Authority. This work was compiled by international consultant Dr D.J. Butler, R&D Environmental Ltd, NZ. The NES is grateful for the involvement of all those who have assisted with this plan with particular appreciation of the efforts of the Biosecurity team during the successful Incursion Response Simulation Exercise carried out as part of the project. Funding was provided within the GEF-PAS project: “Prevention, control and management of invasive alien species in the Pacific Islands” delivered by National Environment Service coordinated by the
Recommended publications
  • Pacific Entomologist 1925-1966
    RECOLLEcnONS OF A Pacific Entomologist 1925-1966 WITH PHOTOGRAPHS BY THE AUTHOR R.W. Paine Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 1994 The Australian Centre for Intemational Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of Ihe Australian Parliament. lis primary mandate is 10 help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names ore used this does not constitute endorsement of nar discrimination against any product by the Centre. This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or malerial deemed relevant 10 ACIAR's research and development objectives. The series is distributed intemationally, with an emphasis on developing countries. © Australian Centre for Intemational Agricultural Research GPO Box 157 t Conberra, Australia 2601 . Paine, R.w. 1994. Recollections of a Pacific Entomologist 1925 - 1966. ACIAR Monograph No 27. 120pp. ISBN 1 86320 106 8 Technical editing and production: Arowang Information Bureau Ply Ltd. Canberra Cover: BPD Graphic Associates, Canberra in association with Arawang Information Bureau Ply Lld Printed by The Craftsman Press Ply Ltd. Burwood, Victoria. ACIAR acknowledges the generous support of tihe Paine family in the compilation of this book. Long before agricultural 1920s was already at the Foreword sustainability entered forefront of world biological common parlance, or hazards control activities. Many of the associated with misuse of projects studied by Ron Paine pesticides captured headlines, and his colleagues are touched environmentally friendly on in his delightful and biological control of introduced evocative reminiscences.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect & Mite Management
    BANANAS INSECT & MITE MANAGEMENT Bruno Pinese Queensland Fruit &. Vegetable Growers Richard Piper BANANAS INSECT & MITE MANAGEMENT Bruno Pinese Richard Piper DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES QUEENSLAND ISSN 0727-6273 Agdex 231/620 First published 1994 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data: Pinese, B. (Bruno), 1949-. Bananas: insect and mite management. ISBN 0 7242 5401 3. 1. Banana- Diseases and pests- Control- Queensland. I. Piper, Richard, 1958-. II. Queensland. Dept. of Primary Industries. Ill. Title. (Series: Information series (Queensland. Dept. of Primary Industries); QI93048). 634.77299 Editing, production and printing managed by Publishing Services ©Queensland Government 1994 Department of Primary Industries GPO Box46 Brisbane Q 4001 Cover: Stethorus larva: bunch of Cavendish bananas within a protective polythene sleeve CONTENTS Foreword v Acknowledgements vi About the authors vii Preface IX Notes to growers X 1 THE INTEGRA TED PEST MANAGEMENT (I PM) CONCEPT 2 BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF BANANA PESTS 3 3 MONITORING PROCEDURES 5 4 MAJOR PESTS 9 Banana scab moth (Nacoleia octasema) 9 Banana rust thrips (Chaetanaphothrips signipennis) 13 Mites: Banana spider mite (Tetranychus lambi) 17 Two-spolled mite (Terranychus urticae) 17 Biological control: M ite-eating ladybird (Stethoms) 2 1 Banana weevil borer (Cosmopolites sordidus) 23 Sugarcane bud moth (Opogona glycyphaga) 26 Banana fl ower Lhrips (Thrips hawaiiensis) 28 5 MINOR PESTS 31 Banana aphid ( Pentalonia nigronervosa) 3 1 Red houldered leaf beetle (Monolepta
    [Show full text]
  • PACIFIC INSECTS MONOGRAPH Ll
    PACIFIC INSECTS MONOGRAPH ll Lepidoptera of American Samoa with particular reference to biology and ecology By John Adams Comstock Published by Entomology Department, Bernice P. Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawaii, U. S. A. 1966 PACIFIC INSECTS MONOGRAPHS Published by Entomology Department, Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96819, U. S. A. Editorial Committee: J. L. Gressitt, Editor (Honolulu), S. Asahina (Tokyo), R. G. Fennah (London), R. A. Harrison (Christchurch), T. C. Maa (Honolulu & Taipei), C. W. Sabrosky (Washington, D. C), R. L. Usinger (Berkeley), J. van der Vecht (Leiden), K. Yasumatsu (Fukuoka), E. C. Zimmerman (New Hampshire). Assistant Editors: P. D. Ashlock (Honolulu), Carol Higa (Honolulu), Naoko Kunimori (Fukuoka), Setsuko Nakata (Honolulu), Toshi Takata (Fukuoka). Business Manager: C. M. Yoshimoto (Honolulu). Business Assistant: Doris Anbe (Honolulu). Business Agent in Japan: K. Yasumatsu (Fukuoka). Entomological staff, Bishop Museum, 1966: Doris Anbe, Hatsuko Arakaki, P. D. Ashlock, S. Azuma, Madaline Boyes, Candida Cardenas, Ann Cutting, M. L. Goff, J. L. Gressitt (Chairman), J. Harrell, Carol Higa, Y. Hirashima, Shirley Hokama, E. Holzapfel, Dorothy Hoxie, Helen Hurd, June Ibara, Naoko Kuni­ mori, T. C. Maa, Grace Nakahashi, Setsuko Nakata (Adm. Asst.), Tulene Nonomura, Carol Okuma, Ka­ tharine Pigue, Linda Reineccius, T. Saigusa, I. Sakakibara, Judy Sakamoto, G. A. Samuelson, Sybil Seto, W. A. Steffan, Amy Suehiro, Grace Thompson, Clara Uchida, J. R. Vockeroth, Nixon Wilson, Mabel Ya- tsuoka, C. M. Yoshimoto, E. C. Zimmermann. Field associates: M. J. Fitzsimons, E. E. Gless, G. E. Lip- pert, V. Peckham, D. S. Rabor, J. Sedlacek, M. Sedlacek, P. Shanahan, R. Straatman, J. Strong, H. M. Tor- revillas, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Immature Stages and Adult Genitalia of the Banana Scab Moth, Nacoleia Octasema (Pyralidae: Pyraustinae), from North Queensland
    Pacific Insects Vol. 19, no. 1-2: 45-51 20 October 1978 DESCRIPTION OF THE IMMATURE STAGES AND ADULT GENITALIA OF THE BANANA SCAB MOTH, NACOLEIA OCTASEMA (PYRALIDAE: PYRAUSTINAE), FROM NORTH QUEENSLAND By B. A. Franzmann1 and Rae Garrett2 Abstract: The egg, larva, pupa and adult genitalia of Nacoleia octasema from North Queensland are described. The banana scab moth Nacoleia octasema (Meyr.) is an important pest of bananas in the island groups of the Southwest Pacific, the Malay Archipelago and tropical Queensland (Paine 1964). The need for an extensive taxonomic study of the species is apparent as, at present, geographically separated races with different food plants are considered to form a single species, and workers on the taxonomy of the Pyraustinae agree that N. octasema fits no existing genus (Paine 1964). Some characteristics of the egg, larva and pupa were described in general terms by Paine (1964). Although the adult has been described superficially (Meyrick 1886, Leefmans 1916, Paine 1964), no description or figures ofthe genitalia have yet been published. Descriptions ofthe external morphology ofthe egg, larva and pupa, and the genitalia of the adult are presented here. MATERIALS AND METHODS All specimens used in this study were collected from banana plants in North Queensland. Eggs were examined and measured using a stereomicroscope with an eyepiece micrometer. All larval instars were examined either as whole specimens in 80% alcohol or as slide- mounted larval skins prepared according to Common (1965), the only modification being the use of acid fuschin stain instead of mercurochrome. Pupae were examined live or preserved in 80% alcohol.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Access of Papua New Guinea Bananas (Musa Spp.) with Particular Respect to Banana Fly (Bactrocera Musae (Tryon)) (Diptera: Tephritidae)
    Market Access of Papua New Guinea Bananas (Musa spp.) with Particular Respect to Banana Fly (Bactrocera musae (Tryon)) (Diptera: Tephritidae) Amanda Mararuai B.Sc Agriculture, Graduate Diploma in Applied Science A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Natural Resource Sciences Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Australia April 2010 Keywords Bactrocera musae, banana fly, bananas, biosecurity, host availability, invasion biology, invasive, market access, Musa spp., novel environment, Papua New Guinea, pest risk analysis, population distribution ii Abstract International market access for fresh commodities is regulated by international accepted phytosanitary guidelines, the objectives of which are to reduce the biosecurity risk of plant pest and disease movement. Papua New Guinea (PNG) has identified banana as a potential export crop and to help meet international market access requirements, this thesis provides information for the development of a pest risk analysis (PRA) for PNG banana fruit. The PRA is a three step process which first identifies the pests associated with a particular commodity or pathway, then assesses the risk associated with those pests, and finally identifies risk management options for those pests if required. As the first step of the PRA process, I collated a definitive list on the organisms associated with the banana plant in PNG using formal literature, structured interviews with local experts, grey literature and unpublished file material held in PNG field research stations. I identified 112 organisms (invertebrates, vertebrate, pathogens and weeds) associated with banana in PNG, but only 14 of these were reported as commonly requiring management. For these 14 I present detailed information summaries on their known biology and pest impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights Section Reports Urena Lobata L
    DACS-P-00124 Volume 53, Number 5, September - October 2014 DPI’s Bureau of Entomology, Nematology and Plant Pathology (the botany section is included in this bureau) produces TRI- OLOGY six times a year, covering two months of activity in each issue. The report includes detection activities from nursery plant inspections, routine and emergency program surveys, and requests for identification of plants and pests from the public. Samples are also occasionally sent from other states or countries for identification or diagnosis. Highlights Section Reports Urena lobata L. (Caesar weed, Congo jute, bur mallow), Malvaceae. In areas with freezing Botany Section 2 temperatures, this perennial shrub can die back in winter to return from the roots in spring. Entomology Section 5 This species grows well in disturbed sites, including Nematology Section 11 Urena lobata L. (Caesar weed) wetland areas where it can form thickets. It is included Photograph courtesy of Roger Hammer, Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants on the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (FLEPPC) Plant Pathology Section 13 http://florida.plantatlas.usf.edu/Photo. Invasive Species List-Category I list (exotic plants that aspx?id=2119 have altered native plant communities). Nacoleia charesalis, a crambid moth, a new Western Hemisphere record. This brown moth is widely distributed in Asia. Since the initial detection in 2012, it has become widely distributed in Florida. Some reports were delayed until the type specimen could be borrowed to confirm the specific identification. Nacoleia charesalis, a crambid moth, male (mm scale at top of image) Brachyodina metzi, a soldier fly, a new Continental Photograph courtesy of James E.
    [Show full text]
  • BER Volume 50 Issue 4 Front Matter and Errata
    BULLETIN OF ENTOMOLOGICAL RESEARCH ISSUED BY THE COMMONWEALTH INSTITUTE OF ENTOMOLOGY EDITOR : THE DIRECTOR VOL. 50. LONDON: COMMONWEALTH INSTITUTE OF ENTOMOLOGY. 56. QUEEN'S GATE. S.W.7. I960. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.93, on 27 Sep 2021 at 22:45:32, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300054663 Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. EXECUTIVE COUNCIL. A. PERERA, Chairman, Ceylon. C. K. REHEEM, Vice-Chairman, Pakistan. W. G. ALEXANDER, C.B.E., United Kingdom. J. G. MALLOCH, M.B.E., Ph.D., Canada. E. J. DRAKE, Australia. V. ARMSTRONG, Ph.D., New Zealand. J. F. BROOKS, Union of South Africa. S. KRISHNAMURTI, India. W. W. K. VANDERPUYE, Ghana. J. D. DE SILVA, Federation of Malaya. J. E. C. COVENTRY, Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland. C. E. LAMBERT, C.M.G., Colonial Territories. Sir HERBERT HOWARD, Secretary, Farnham House, Farnham Royal, Nr. Slough, Bucks. COMMONWEALTH INSTITUTE OF ENTOMOLOGY. Director and Editor. E. O. PEARSON, M.A. Assistant Director. R. G. FENNAH, M.A. Assistant Editor. W. RUTTLEDGE, M.A. Head Office—c/o British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London S.W.7. Publication Office and UbraryS6, Queen's Gate, London, S.W.7. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.93, on 27 Sep 2021 at 22:45:32, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485300054663 CONTENTS. PAGE BENNETT, F.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing Banana and Plantain R & D in Asia and the Pacific
    AdvancingAdvancing bananabanana andand plantainplantain RR && DD inin AsiaAsia andand thethe PacificPacific -- VVol.ol. 1010 Proceedings of the 10th INIBAP-ASPNET Regional Advisory Committee meeting held at Bangkok, Thailand -- 10-11 November 2000 A.B. Molina, V.N. Roa and M.A.G. Maghuyop, editors The mission of the International Network for the Improvement of Banana and Plantain (INIBAP) is to sustainably increase the productivity of banana and plantain grown on smallholdings for domestic consumption and for local and export markets. The Programme has four specific objectives: • To organize and coordinate a global research effort on banana and plantain, aimed at the development, evaluation and dissemination of improved banana cultivars and at the conservation and use of Musa diversity. • To promote and strengthen collaboration and partnerships in banana-related activities at the national, regional and global levels. • To strengthen the ability of NARS to conduct research and development activities on bananas and plantains. • To coordinate, facilitate and support the production, collection and exchange of information and documentation related to banana and plantain. Since May 1994, INIBAP is a programme of the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), a Future Harvest Centre. The International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI) is an autonomous international scientific organization, supported by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). IPGRI’s mandate is to advocate the conservation and use of plant genetic resources for the benefit of present and future generations. IPGRI’s headquarters is based in Rome, Italy, with offices in another 14 countries worldwide. It operates through three programmes: (1) the Plant Genetic Resources Programme, (2) the CGIAR Genetic Resources Support Programme, and (3) the International Network for the Improvement of Banana and Plantain (INIBAP).
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae) Inferred from DNA and Morphology 141-204 77 (1): 141 – 204 2019
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny Jahr/Year: 2019 Band/Volume: 77 Autor(en)/Author(s): Mally Richard, Hayden James E., Neinhuis Christoph, Jordal Bjarte H., Nuss Matthias Artikel/Article: The phylogenetic systematics of Spilomelinae and Pyraustinae (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae) inferred from DNA and morphology 141-204 77 (1): 141 – 204 2019 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2019. The phylogenetic systematics of Spilomelinae and Pyraustinae (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae) inferred from DNA and morphology Richard Mally *, 1, James E. Hayden 2, Christoph Neinhuis 3, Bjarte H. Jordal 1 & Matthias Nuss 4 1 University Museum of Bergen, Natural History Collections, Realfagbygget, Allégaten 41, 5007 Bergen, Norway; Richard Mally [richard. [email protected], [email protected]], Bjarte H. Jordal [[email protected]] — 2 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Ser- vices, Division of Plant Industry, 1911 SW 34th Street, Gainesville, FL 32608 USA; James E. Hayden [[email protected]] — 3 Technische Universität Dresden, Institut für Botanik, 01062 Dresden, Germany; Christoph Neinhuis [[email protected]] — 4 Senckenberg Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Museum für Tierkunde, Königsbrücker Landstraße 159, 01109 Dresden, Germany; Matthias Nuss [[email protected]] — * Corresponding author Accepted on March 14, 2019. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on May 17, 2019. Published in print on June 03, 2019. Editors in charge: Brian Wiegmann & Klaus-Dieter Klass. Abstract. Spilomelinae and Pyraustinae form a species-rich monophylum of Crambidae (snout moths). Morphological distinction of the two groups has been diffcult in the past, and the morphologically heterogenous Spilomelinae has not been broadly accepted as a natural group due to the lack of convincing apomorphies.
    [Show full text]
  • View Full Text Article
    Color profile: Disabled Composite 150 lpi at 45 degrees 2 Pests of Banana C.S. Gold,1 B. Pinese2 and J.E. Peña3 1International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, ESARC, PO Box 7878, Kampala, Uganda; 2Queensland Department of Primary Industries, PO Box 1054, Mareeba, Queensland 4880, Australia; 3Tropical Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 18905 SW 280 Street, Homestead, Florida 33031, USA Bananas and plantains (Musa spp.) are among western Africa, Latin America and the Carib- the most important crops in tropical and sub- bean. Dessert bananas, especially Cavendish tropical climates. The genus Musa evolved in clones (AAA), are important export crops in South-East Asia (Stover and Simmonds, 1987) Latin America and the Caribbean, Africa, Asia where numerous undomesticated Musa spe- and the Pacific, and Australia. cies still grow as ‘opportunistic weeds’ (Price, In terms of gross value of production, 1995). Edible bananas (Musa spp., Eumusa bananas and plantains are the fourth most series) originated within this region from two important global food crop. World production wild progenitors, Musa acuminata and M. is calculated to be 87,934,558 t (INIBAP, 2001). balbisiana, producing a series of diploids, trip- Export bananas are the developing world’s loids and tetraploids through natural hybrid- fourth most important commodity and most ization. Additionally, man has selected for important fruit crop (INIBAP, 2001). Bananas parthenocarpy (development of fruit without grown for export are almost exclusively of one pollination or seeds). Simmonds and Shep- variety, ‘Cavendish’; this cultivar accounts herd (1955) provided a key by which these for little more than 10% of global production.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Host Specificity and Abundance of Frugivorous Lepidoptera in the Lowland Rain Forests of Papua New Guinea
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Low host specificity and abundance of frugivorous lepidoptera in the lowland rain forests of Papua New Guinea Katerina Sam1,2*, Richard Ctvrtecka1, Scott E. Miller3, Margaret E. Rosati3, Kenneth Molem4, Kipiro Damas4,5,6, Bradley Gewa4, Vojtech Novotny1,2 1 University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, Branisovska, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic, 2 Biology Centre CAS, Institute of Entomology, Branisovska, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic, 3 National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, United States of America, 4 New Guinea a1111111111 Binatang Research Center, Madang, Papua New Guinea, 5 The University of Papua New Guinea, Waigani, a1111111111 University, National Capital District, Papua New Guinea, 6 Papua New Guinea Forest Research Institute, a1111111111 Lae, Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea a1111111111 a1111111111 * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS We studied a community of frugivorous Lepidoptera in the lowland rainforest of Papua New Citation: Sam K, Ctvrtecka R, Miller SE, Rosati ME, Guinea. Rearing revealed 122 species represented by 1,720 individuals from 326 woody Molem K, Damas K, et al. (2017) Low host plant species. Only fruits from 52% (171) of the plant species sampled were attacked. On specificity and abundance of frugivorous average, Lepidoptera were reared from 1 in 89 fruits and a kilogram of fruit was attacked by lepidoptera in the lowland rain forests of Papua New Guinea. PLoS ONE 12(2): e0171843. 1.01 individuals. Host specificity of Lepidoptera was notably low: 69% (33) of species attacked doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171843 plants from >1 family, 8% (4) fed on single family, 6% (3) on single genus and 17% (8) were Editor: William J.
    [Show full text]
  • Banana Scab Moth (017)
    Pacific Pests, Pathogens and Weeds - Online edition Banana scab moth (017) Common Name Banana scab moth Scientific Name Nacoleia octasema (previously, Lamprosema octasema) Distribution Asia and Oceania. It is recorded from American Samoa, Australia, Fiji, Federated States of Micronesia, New Caledonia, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Vanuatu, and Wallis and Futuna. Hosts Banana, plantain, Heliconia and Pandanus. Symptoms & Life Cycle Photo 1. Scabby areas on the skin of banana fruits due to the feeding of the scab moth, The caterpillars feed on the skin of the young fruit, while hiding in protected areas between the Nacoleia octasema. fingers and the fruit stalk. Sometimes, they eat through the skin and feed on the banana pulp. Damaged areas form a black scab (Photo 1). Eggs are laid in the early evening on or near to an emerging banana bunch. The eggs are flat, oval-shaped and about 1.3 mm across. They are laid singly or in clusters of up to 30 and look like overlapping fish scales. The caterpillars hatch after about 4 days and move to the young fruit under the tightly closed bracts (the leaves around the young bunches) to feed. As the bracts and hands lift from the bunch stalk, the caterpillar moves to the next closed hand. When newly hatched, the caterpillars are about 1.5 mm long and clear yellow; when fully-grown, they are up to 50 mm long, and vary from pinkish-grey to very dark brown (Photos 2-4). After feeding for about 2 weeks, the caterpillars are ready to pupate. They spin a thin silken cocoon, adding some rubbish, which helps to hide them.
    [Show full text]