DOCSLIB.ORG

Djvu Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Djvu Document Vol. 1, no. lJ., December 1986 INSECTA MUNDI 261 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF TIlE WORLD LITERATURE OF THE BETHYLIDAE (HYMENOPTERA: BETHYLOIDEA) 1 2 Bradford A. Hawkins and Gordon Gordh The Bethylidae are a primitive family of Anonymous. lCl05. Notes on insect pests from aculeate Hymenoptera which presently the Entomological Section, Indian consists of about 2,200 nominal species. Museum. Ind. Mus. Notes 5.164 181. They are worldwide in distribution and all Anonymous. 1936. Distribuicao de vespa de species ale plimaly, extellml parasites of Uganda. Biologico 2:218 219. Lepidoptera and Coleoptera larvae. Due to Anonymous. 1937. A broca Ie a vespa. their host associations, bethylids are Biologico 3:217 219. potentially useful for the biological Anonymous. 1937. Annual Report. Indian Lac control of various agricultural pests in Research Inst., 1936-1937, 37 pp. the aforementioned groups. Unfortunately, Anonymous. 1940. E'preciso sustentar a luta the true potential of bethylids in applied contra a broca. Sitios Fazendas 2:42-43. biological control cannot be ascertained Anonymous. 1956. Annual report for the now because they have been used financial year 1954-1955. Indian Lac. infrequently. Some species show strong Res. Inst., pp. 1-45. promise, but their use is handicapped by a Anonymous. 1957. Annual report for the relative lack of basic taxonomic and financial year 1955-1956. Indian I.ac. biological knowledge. The most recent Res. Inst., pp. 1-90. world catalog for bethylids is Kieffer Anonymous. 1951. Cooperative economic (1914). A world catalog is forthcoming insect report. Agr. Res. Servo U.S.D.A. (Gordh, in prep.). There has never been a 7(16):309. compilation of the world literature. Anthony, J., and Kurian, C. 1960. Studies This bibliography provides a world list on the habits and life history of of references to bethylids through 1984, PERISIERQLA NEPHANTIDIS Muesebeck. including taxonomy, biology, ecology, Indian Coconut Jour. 13.145-153. distribution, host relationships, and their Arle, R. 1929. Note sur quelques Bethylides use in biological control. References (Hym. ) captuIes aux enviIons d' Auxen e cited are those verified by us. We have (Yonne), avec la description d'une omitted a few that we have been unable to elSpe<.:e nouvelle du gem e BETIIYLUS Latr. obtain or confirm. A few citations ale fOI Bull. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 34.61 63. various reasons incomplete but have been 1930. Un nouveau PRISTOCERA de l'Afrique included when enough infoIilia tion is equatoriale. Bul. Hus. Nat. d'Uist. 'Nat. available to obtain the paper. We are Paris, Sere 2. 2:546-547. gIateful to PlofessoI Laszlo Hoczar for Asahina, S. 1953. On a remarkable case of supplying key references to the Mesitinae. the biting of a parasitic wasp. SCLERODERMUS NIPPONENSIS ¥uasa in Tokyo BIBLIOGRAPHY (Hymenoptera. Bethylidae). Jap. Jour. Ked. Sci. BioI. 6:197-199. Achterberg, C. Van. 1983. Notes on the Ashmead, W. H. 1887. Studies on the North Fabrician types of Palearctic Tiphiinae ~~erican Proctotrupidae with descrip­ (Insecta, Hymenoptera. Tiphiidae). tions of new species from Florida. Can. Steenstrupia 9:73-74. Entomol. 19'192-197. Allen, H. W., Holloway, J. K., and 1887. Studies of the North American Haeussler. G. J. 1940. Importation, Proctotrupidae. with descriptions of new rearing and colonization of parasites of species from Florida. Entomal. Amer. the oriental fruit moth. U.S.D.A. Circ. 3: 73-76. 561. 61 pp. 1887. Studies on the North American E"roctotrupidae with descriptions of new species from Florida. Entomol. Amer. 3:97-100. IDepartment of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, 1890. On the Hymenoptera of Colorado. Rio Piedras, PR 00931 Colo. BioI. Assoc. Bull. I, 47 pp. 2DiviBion of Biological Control, Department of Ento- 1893. A mOlloglaph of the North American mology, University of California, Riverside, CA Proctotrupidae. Bethylinae. Bull. U.S. 92521 Natl. Mus. 45.27 77. 262 INSECTA MUNDI vol. I, no. 4, December 1986 1894. Report upon the parasitic ANTHRENUS VORAX Waterhouse. Proc. Hymenoptera of the Island of St. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 42:110-113. Vincent. Bethylinae. Jour. Linn. Soc. Back, E. A., and Cotton, R. T. 1938. London 25:188-196. Parasites of grain pests. U.S.D.A. 1895. Some parasitic Hymenoptera from Baja Farmers Bull. 1260, pp. 42-45. California and Tepic. Mexico. Proc. Baker, C. L. 1976. The biology of Calif. Acad. Sci. 5:539-555. PRISTOCERA RUFA Kieffer (Hymenoptera· 1895. Report on the parasitic Hymenoptera Bethylidae), a parasite of PANATORHYTES of the Island of Grenada. Bethylinae. SZENTIVANYI Marshall (Coleoptera: Curcu- Proc. Zool. Soc. London (1895):786-787. lionidae) in Papua New Guinea. Jour. 1900. Notes on some New Zealand and Allst. Entomol • Soc. 15·153-164. Australian parasitic Hymenoptera, with Beardsley, J. W., and Tuthill, L. D. 1959. descriptions of new genera and new Additions to the known insect fauna of species. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. (1900). Niihau. Proc. Hawaii. Entomol. Soc. 17: 327 360. 56-61. 1901. Hymenoptera Parasitica. Fauna Beeson, C. F. C., and Chatterjee, S. N. Hawaiiensis 1:227 364. 1939. Further notes on the biology of 1902. Classification of the fossorial, parasites of teak defoliators in India. predaceous and parasitic wasps, or the Indian Forest Rec. 5.357-370. superfamily Vespoidea. No. 9. Begemann, H. 1926. Verslag van den Bethylidae. Can. Entomol. 34:268 273. entomoloog over het 'l'iJdvak 3 DecelDber 1902. Papers from the Harriman Alaska 1924-31 (December 1925). Meded. Koffie- Expedition. XXVIII. Hymenoptera. Proc. bessenboeboek Fonds 14:194 207. Wash. Acad. Sci. 4:117-274. 1927. Verslag van den entomoloog over het 190 J. Descriptions of three new parasitic jaar 1926. Meded. Kaffiebessenbaebaek Hymenoptera from India. I.H.H.N. 5:2-3. Fonds 15: 1-21. 1904. Descriptions of new Hymenoptera from Bennet, F. D. 1960. Parasites of Japan. Jour. N.Y. Entomol. Soc. 12: ANCYLOSTOMA STERCOREA (Zell.) 65 88. (Pyralidae, Lepidoptera), a pod borer 1904. Descriptions of new genera and attacking pigeon pea in Trinidad. Bull. species of Hymenoptera from the Philip­ Entomol. Res. 50:737-757. pine Islands. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 28: 1965. Tests with parasites of Asian 127 158. graminaceous moth-borers on DIATRAEA and 1905. New Hymenoptera from the Philip- allied genera in Trinidad. Commw. Inst. pines. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 29.107-119. 8iol. Contr. Tech. 8ull. 5:101-116. Askew, R. R. 1972. Parasitic Insects. 19/1. Current status of biological control Heinemann, London, 316 pp. of the small moth borers of sugarcane Audouin, M. V. 1842. IUstorie des insectes DIAIRAEA spp. (Lep. PyraLidae). Rntomo- nuisibles a la vigne, de la pyrale. phaga 16:111-124. Fortin, Masson, Inc., Paris, 342 pp. Bennet, S. E. 1961. The strawberry leaf Avasthy, P. N., and Chaudhary, J. P. 1963. roller complex in Tennessee. Jour. Tenn. First record of a bethylid parasite on Acad. Sci. 36:320-360. the armyworm, PSEUDALETIA UNIPUNCTA Haw. Benoit P. L. G. 1952. Beth 7:192. Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di 1966. Studies on PARASIEROLA sp. a Genova. Dortana 1.1 7. parasite of armyworm. Indian Jour. 1956. Contributions a l'etude de la faune Entomol. 27·414-422. entomologigue du Ruanda Urundi Otission Ayyappa, P. K., and Cheema, P. S. 1952. An P. Basilewsky 1953). Hymenoptera: CXII. ectoparasite on the larvae of ANTHRENUS Bethylidae. Ann. Mus. Congo BeIge (Ser. VORAX Waterhouse. Proc. Indian Acad. B) Sci. Geol. 51:560 564. Sci. 36:215-222. 1957. Hymenoptera Bethylidae. Explor. Ayyar, T. V. R. 1917. A catalog of new Pare. Nat'l. Albert Miss. G.F. deWitte, wasps and bees (Fossores, Diplotera and 1933-1935. 88:1-57. Anthophila) described from the Indian 1963. Honographie des Bethylidae d'Afrique region since 1897. Jour. Bombay Nat. noire (Hymenoptera) I. Sous-familie Hist. Soc. 25:92-103. Pristocerinae tribu Dicrogenini tri~1 1927. The parasitic Hymenoptera of Pristocerini, gen. PRISTOCERA Klug. Ann. economic importance noted from South Mns. R. Afr. Centro (Ser. 8, Zool.), No. India. Bull. Entomol. Res. 18:73-78. 119, 95 pp. Back, E. A. 1940. A new parasite of Vol. 1, no. 4, December 1986 INSECTA MUNDI 263 1963. Bethylides nord-africains recoltes nord-africaines. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. par M. L. Berland. Bull. Mus. Natl. Afr. Nord 39'160-167. Hist. Nat. 35:82-84. Betrem, J. G. 1961. CEPHALONOHIA STEPHANO­ 1963. Rectifications a rna revision des DERlS n. spec. (Kym., Bethylldae). Bethylidae (Hymenoptera) africains, Vol. Entomol. Berich. 21:183-184. I. Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr. 67:5-10. Bianchi, F. A. 1944. The recent 1ntrodu c- 1967. Un Bethylide nouveau, CEPHALONOHIA tion of armyworm parasites from Texas. MATEUI n. sp., parasite de coleopteres Rawaii. Pl. Rec. 48:203-212. xylophages au Sahara. Rev. Zool. Bot. Bianconi, G. A. 1867. Intorno ~d alcuni Aft. 76.341 344. insetti perforatori dei metalli memoria. 1968. Contribution a l'etude des especes Acad. Sci. Inst. Bologna Cl. Sci. Fische africaines du genere tffiSITIUS Spinola Mem. Sere 2. 6:439-455. (Hym. Bethylidae). Rev. Zool. Bot. Afr. Bischoff, H. 1910. Die Chrysididen des 77:83 94. Koniglichen Zoologischen Museums zu 1982. Bethylidae africains. II. (Byme- Bediu. Mitt. Zool. Hus. Bedin 4:245 noptera) Le genre KATHEPYRIS Kieffer. 293 t 7. Rev. Zool. Bot~ Afr. 96:185-192. 1927. Biologie der Hymellopteren. J. Springer, Berlin, 598 pp. Blair, K. C. 1944. A note on the economy of Belg. Med. Trop. 4:163-165. the rose bedeguar gall, RHODITES ROSAE Bergamin, G. A. 1945. 3 -Comhate bio1ogico • L. Free. Se. Lenden intemel. Nat. Bist. Bol. Super. Servo Cafe S. Paulo 20: Soc. (1943-1944):55-59. 972-975. Blanchard, E. M. 1851. Histoire naturelle Berland, L. 1928. Bethylidae. In Faune de des insectes. Soc. Bibliophile, Paris, France Bymenopteres Vespiformes II, pp. 287-288. Vol. 19, pp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Classical Biological Control of Arthropods in Australia
    Classical Biological Contents Control of Arthropods Arthropod index in Australia General index List of targets D.F. Waterhouse D.P.A. Sands CSIRo Entomology Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 2001 Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index List of targets The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia Waterhouse, D.F. and Sands, D.P.A. 2001. Classical biological control of arthropods in Australia. ACIAR Monograph No. 77, 560 pages. ISBN 0 642 45709 3 (print) ISBN 0 642 45710 7 (electronic) Published in association with CSIRO Entomology (Canberra) and CSIRO Publishing (Melbourne) Scientific editing by Dr Mary Webb, Arawang Editorial, Canberra Design and typesetting by ClarusDesign, Canberra Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne Cover: An ichneumonid parasitoid Megarhyssa nortoni ovipositing on a larva of sirex wood wasp, Sirex noctilio. Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index Foreword List of targets WHEN THE CSIR Division of Economic Entomology, now Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Entomology, was established in 1928, classical biological control was given as one of its core activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • André Nel Sixtieth Anniversary Festschrift
    Palaeoentomology 002 (6): 534–555 ISSN 2624-2826 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/pe/ PALAEOENTOMOLOGY PE Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press Editorial ISSN 2624-2834 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.2.6.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:25D35BD3-0C86-4BD6-B350-C98CA499A9B4 André Nel sixtieth anniversary Festschrift DANY AZAR1, 2, ROMAIN GARROUSTE3 & ANTONIO ARILLO4 1Lebanese University, Faculty of Sciences II, Department of Natural Sciences, P.O. Box: 26110217, Fanar, Matn, Lebanon. Email: [email protected] 2State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Center for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China. 3Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité, ISYEB-UMR 7205-CNRS, MNHN, UPMC, EPHE, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 50, Entomologie, F-75005, Paris, France. 4Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain. FIGURE 1. Portrait of André Nel. During the last “International Congress on Fossil Insects, mainly by our esteemed Russian colleagues, and where Arthropods and Amber” held this year in the Dominican several of our members in the IPS contributed in edited volumes honoring some of our great scientists. Republic, we unanimously agreed—in the International This issue is a Festschrift to celebrate the 60th Palaeoentomological Society (IPS)—to honor our great birthday of Professor André Nel (from the ‘Muséum colleagues who have given us and the science (and still) national d’Histoire naturelle’, Paris) and constitutes significant knowledge on the evolution of fossil insects a tribute to him for his great ongoing, prolific and his and terrestrial arthropods over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometro
    Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, & Noctuoidea) Biodiversity Inventory of the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab Hugo L. Kons Jr. Last Update: June 2001 Abstract A systematic check list of 489 species of Lepidoptera collected in the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab is presented, including 464 species in the superfamilies Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, and Noctuoidea. Taxa recorded in Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, and Thyrididae are also included. Moth taxa were collected at ultraviolet lights, bait, introduced Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), and by netting specimens. A list of taxa recorded feeding on P. notatum is presented. Introduction The University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Laboratory (NATL) contains 40 acres of natural habitats maintained for scientific research, conservation, and teaching purposes. Habitat types present include hammock, upland pine, disturbed open field, cat tail marsh, and shallow pond. An active management plan has been developed for this area, including prescribed burning to restore the upland pine community and establishment of plots to study succession (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/natl.htm). The site is a popular collecting locality for student and scientific collections. The author has done extensive collecting and field work at NATL, and two previous reports have resulted from this work, including: a biodiversity inventory of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea & Papilionoidea) of NATL (Kons 1999), and an ecological study of Hermeuptychia hermes (F.) and Megisto cymela (Cram.) in NATL habitats (Kons 1998). Other workers have posted NATL check lists for Ichneumonidae, Sphecidae, Tettigoniidae, and Gryllidae (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/insect.htm).
    [Show full text]
  • Container List
    Special Collections of the National Agricultural Library: Agricultural Research Service Biological Control Documentation Center Collection Series I. Asian Parasite Laboratory. Subseries I.A. Correspondence. Container List Series I. Asian Parasite Laboratory (APL). 1927-1993. 20 boxes. Series I.A. Correspondence. 1963-1993. 16.5 boxes. Box 1 Folder 1 Abrahamson, Lawrence P. 1983-1984 Box 1 Folder 2 Abstract n.d. Box 1 Folder 3 Academic Press, Inc. 1986-1993 Box 1 Folder 4 Achterberg, Dr. Kees van 1982 Box 1 Folder 5 Aeschlimann, Dr. Jean-Paul 1981-1985 Box 1 Folder 6 Agricultural Counselor 1976-1981 Box 1 Folder 7 Air Force, Army 1980-1981 Box 1 Folder 8 Aizawa, Professor Keio 1986 Box 1 Folder 9 Akasaka, Naoyuki 1982 Box 1 Folder 10 Allen, Professor Douglas C. 1981 Box 1 Folder 11 Allen Press, Inc. 1992-1993 Box 1 Folder 12 American Embassy, Beijing, China 1990-1991 Box 1 Folder 13 American Embassy, Tokyo, Japan 1981-1990 Box 1 Folder 14 American Journal of Botany 1992 Box 1 Folder 15 Amman, Dr. Gene D. 1982 Box 1 Folder 16 Amrine, Jr., Dr. James W. 1986 Box 1 Folder 17 Anderson, Don M. 1981-1983 Box 1 Folder 18 Anderson, John F. 1975-1976 Box 1 Folder 19 Andres, Dr. Lloyd 1989-1990 Box 1 Folder 20 Angalet, Dr. George W. 1973-1978 Box 1 Folder 21 Annual Reviews Inc. 1992 Box 1 Folder 22 Ao, Professor Hsien-Bine 1988 Box 1 Folder 23 Aoki, Professor Joji 1977-1978 Box 1 Folder 24 Apps, Dr. Darrel A. 1984 Box 1 Folder 25 Agricultural Research 1980-1981 Box 1 Folder 26 Army, Thomas J.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2011
    Annual Report 2011 © RMCA www.africamuseum.be Foreword 2 Foreword The Royal Museum for Central Africa (RMCA) pub- and culture exhibition was extended, while RMCA lishes a beautiful and richly illustrated annual collection pieces were admired in more than 20 report in book form every two years. In intervening major exhibitions held in different parts of the years – such as 2011 – we publish a digital edition globe. Nearly 30,000 children attended our edu- that is available on our website, and for which a cational workshops or school activities, while our hard copy can be produced on demand. Despite colla boration with African communities became its size, the report is not exhaustive. Rather, it more streamlined. We felt a pang of regret at the seeks to provide the most varied overview pos- departure of ‘our’ elephants in 2011. After grac- sible of our many museum-related, educational, ing our museum’s entrance for three years, the scientific, and other activities on the national and 9 pachyderms that formed the work created by international scene. The long governmental crisis South African artist Andries Botha, You can buy my of 2011 notwithstanding, RMCA was highly pro- heart and my soul, left Tervuren Park for good. ductive and remains one of the most important Africa-focused research institutions, particularly 2011 was also a fruitful year in terms of scientific for Central Africa. research. To highlight the multidisciplinary nature that is the strength of our institution, we organ- As with the previous year, the renovation was one ized ‘Science Days’ for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • Miscellanea 47
    MISCELLANEA 47 Miscellanea Reviews preparation. Champion tree hunter Byron Carmean is recognized for his efforts in Virginia. Featured old trees Remarkable Trees of Virginia, by Nancy Ross Hugo & include stunted red cedars on limestone cliffs along the Jeff Kirwan; photography by Robert Llewellyn. 2008. New River in Giles County that are more than 450 Albemarle Books, Earlysville, VA (distributed by years old (see also Larson, 1997) and huge bald University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville). 206 pp., cypresses along the Blackwater River in Southampton 30 x 28 cm, ca. 160 color photographs (plus six black County that exceed 800 years old. Historic trees include and white). ISBN 978-0-9742707-2-2 (cloth; $49.95). a tulip poplar planted by Thomas Jefferson in 1807 at Monticello and several trees with connections to Civil This large coffee table book features well-written War sites or slavery. Unique trees include hollow, narratives and stunning color photographs of more than bizarre-shaped water tupelos and a massive sycamore 100 of the most “remarkable” trees found in Virginia. leaning at a 45o angle with no signs of falling over. As noted by the authors, about 20 of these trees would The authors discuss many interesting topics in their appear on virtually anyone’s list of the 100 most narratives about specific trees. For example, they remarkable trees in the state. Their task was to sift lament the loss of the once-dominant American through more than 1,000 nominations provided by the chestnut and briefly describe current efforts aimed at general public, as well as other trees identified by their trying to restore this species.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Entomologist 1925-1966
    RECOLLEcnONS OF A Pacific Entomologist 1925-1966 WITH PHOTOGRAPHS BY THE AUTHOR R.W. Paine Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 1994 The Australian Centre for Intemational Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of Ihe Australian Parliament. lis primary mandate is 10 help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names ore used this does not constitute endorsement of nar discrimination against any product by the Centre. This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or malerial deemed relevant 10 ACIAR's research and development objectives. The series is distributed intemationally, with an emphasis on developing countries. © Australian Centre for Intemational Agricultural Research GPO Box 157 t Conberra, Australia 2601 . Paine, R.w. 1994. Recollections of a Pacific Entomologist 1925 - 1966. ACIAR Monograph No 27. 120pp. ISBN 1 86320 106 8 Technical editing and production: Arowang Information Bureau Ply Ltd. Canberra Cover: BPD Graphic Associates, Canberra in association with Arawang Information Bureau Ply Lld Printed by The Craftsman Press Ply Ltd. Burwood, Victoria. ACIAR acknowledges the generous support of tihe Paine family in the compilation of this book. Long before agricultural 1920s was already at the Foreword sustainability entered forefront of world biological common parlance, or hazards control activities. Many of the associated with misuse of projects studied by Ron Paine pesticides captured headlines, and his colleagues are touched environmentally friendly on in his delightful and biological control of introduced evocative reminiscences.
    [Show full text]
  • Wax, Wings, and Swarms: Insects and Their Products As Art Media
    Wax, Wings, and Swarms: Insects and their Products as Art Media Barrett Anthony Klein Pupating Lab Biology Department, University of Wisconsin—La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601 email: [email protected] When citing this paper, please use the following: Klein BA. Submitted. Wax, Wings, and Swarms: Insects and their Products as Art Media. Annu. Rev. Entom. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-020821-060803 Keywords art, cochineal, cultural entomology, ethnoentomology, insect media art, silk 1 Abstract Every facet of human culture is in some way affected by our abundant, diverse insect neighbors. Our relationship with insects has been on display throughout the history of art, sometimes explicitly, but frequently in inconspicuous ways. This is because artists can depict insects overtly, but they can also allude to insects conceptually, or use insect products in a purely utilitarian manner. Insects themselves can serve as art media, and artists have explored or exploited insects for their products (silk, wax, honey, propolis, carmine, shellac, nest paper), body parts (e.g., wings), and whole bodies (dead, alive, individually, or as collectives). This review surveys insects and their products used as media in the visual arts, and considers the untapped potential for artistic exploration of media derived from insects. The history, value, and ethics of “insect media art” are topics relevant at a time when the natural world is at unprecedented risk. INTRODUCTION The value of studying cultural entomology and insect art No review of human culture would be complete without art, and no review of art would be complete without the inclusion of insects. Cultural entomology, a field of study formalized in 1980 (43), and ambitiously reviewed 35 years ago by Charles Hogue (44), clearly illustrates that artists have an inordinate fondness for insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects and Related Arthropods Associated with of Agriculture
    USDA United States Department Insects and Related Arthropods Associated with of Agriculture Forest Service Greenleaf Manzanita in Montane Chaparral Pacific Southwest Communities of Northeastern California Research Station General Technical Report Michael A. Valenti George T. Ferrell Alan A. Berryman PSW-GTR- 167 Publisher: Pacific Southwest Research Station Albany, California Forest Service Mailing address: U.S. Department of Agriculture PO Box 245, Berkeley CA 9470 1 -0245 Abstract Valenti, Michael A.; Ferrell, George T.; Berryman, Alan A. 1997. Insects and related arthropods associated with greenleaf manzanita in montane chaparral communities of northeastern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-167. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. Agriculture; 26 p. September 1997 Specimens representing 19 orders and 169 arthropod families (mostly insects) were collected from greenleaf manzanita brushfields in northeastern California and identified to species whenever possible. More than500 taxa below the family level wereinventoried, and each listing includes relative frequency of encounter, life stages collected, and dominant role in the greenleaf manzanita community. Specific host relationships are included for some predators and parasitoids. Herbivores, predators, and parasitoids comprised the majority (80 percent) of identified insects and related taxa. Retrieval Terms: Arctostaphylos patula, arthropods, California, insects, manzanita The Authors Michael A. Valenti is Forest Health Specialist, Delaware Department of Agriculture, 2320 S. DuPont Hwy, Dover, DE 19901-5515. George T. Ferrell is a retired Research Entomologist, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 2400 Washington Ave., Redding, CA 96001. Alan A. Berryman is Professor of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6382. All photographs were taken by Michael A. Valenti, except for Figure 2, which was taken by Amy H.
    [Show full text]
  • SA Spider Checklist
    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2017/035099 Al 2 March 2017 (02.03.2017) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2017/035099 Al 2 March 2017 (02.03.2017) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, C07C 39/00 (2006.01) C07D 303/32 (2006.01) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, C07C 49/242 (2006.01) HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, (21) International Application Number: MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PCT/US20 16/048092 PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (22) International Filing Date: SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 22 August 2016 (22.08.2016) TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (26) Publication Language: English GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, (30) Priority Data: TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, 62/208,662 22 August 2015 (22.08.2015) US TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, (71) Applicant: NEOZYME INTERNATIONAL, INC.
    [Show full text]