2018 International Mock Board Exam Coalition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2018 International Mock Board Exam Coalition 2018 International Mock Board Exam Coalition West Coast City of Hope/Beckman Research Institute 3/10/18 (Southern CA) Duarte, CA West Coast UC Davis 3/24/18 (Northern CA) Davis, CA Midwest (MN) Mayo Clinic and University of Minnesota 4/7/18 Rochester, MN Midwest (MI) University of Michigan 4/13/18 Ann Arbor, MI Pacific Northwest Oregon National Primate Center 4/14/18 Beaverton, OR Northeast (NY) Tri-Institutional Training Program 4/20/18 New York, NY Mid-Atlantic (MD) Fort Detrick 5/8/18 Fort Detrick, MD Southeast (NC) NCSU Veterinary School 5/20/18 Raleigh, NC Midwest (CO) Colorado State University 5/25/18 Fort Collins, CO Southeast (GA) Yerkes National Primate Research Center 6/8/18 Atlanta, GA Asia Singapore 6/23/18 Europe Stockholm, Sweden 6/29/18 Mock ECLAM Exam Practical Section – Questions Referenced Answers – 53 Pages This examination is meant to be used as a study tool when preparing for the ACLAM or ECLAM Certifying Examinations. The material presented in this mock examination follows the ACLAM role delineation document, but is not necessarily reflective of the ACLAM or ECLAM Certifying Examinations. 1 2018 Exam Contributors Asia Bryan Emmett Ogden DVM, DACLAM – Coordinator Ralph M. Bunte DVM, DACVP Michelle Loh, DVM Jassia Pang DVM, DACLAM Christie Chrisma Domingo Panaligan DVM Yasmina Paramastri DVM, DACLAM Heng Yee Choy Sharon, DVM Europe Michael Wilkinson, DVM, CertLAS, PhD, DipECLAM - Coordinator Janet Rodgers, DVM, DACLAM, DipECLAM - Coordinator Thea Fleischmann Dr Vet Med, Dipl ECLAM Sergio Berdun Marin DVM, PhD, DiplECLAM Sandra Barbosa Perez DVM, MSc, DiplECLAM Mid-Atlantic (Maryland) LTC Sarah Bro, DVM, MPH, DACLAM – Coordinator Patty Chen, DVM, DACLAM – Coordinator Midwest (Colorado) Erin McWhorter, DVM, MS - Coordinator Jessica Ayers, DVM, DACLAM Lon Kendall, DVM, PhD, DACLAM Katie Knapek, DVM, MS Whitney McGee, DVM, PhD James Owiny, DVM, DACLAM Alexa Personett, DVM Brian Smith, DVM Midwest (Michigan) Portia Allen, DVM, MS, DACLAM - Coordinator Patrick Lester DVM, MS, DACLAM - Coordinator Daniel D. Myers, Jr., DVM, MPH, DACLAM - Coordinator Michael P. Bradley, DVM Kelsey Cornelius, DVM Carolyn Doerning, DVM Samantha Eckley, DVM Marian Esvelt, DVM Zachary T Freeman, DVM, PhD, DACLAM Lucy Kennedy, DVM, DACLAM Jennifer Lofgren, DVM, MS, DACLAM Tara Martin, DVM Jibing Yang, DVM, PhD Midwest (Minnesota) Jodi Scholz, DVM, DACLAM – Coordinator Sarah Hashway, DVM - Coordinator Northeast (New York) Christopher Cheleuitte, DVM, PhD - Coordinator Leslie Diaz, MPH, DVM, DACLAM Catalina Echeverri, DVM 2 2018 Exam Contributors Northeast (New York) Odessa Giardino, MS, CVT, RLATG Mariya Gugel, DVM Mandy Kain, MS, DVM Sean Kelly, DVM Kvin Lertpiriyapong, DVM, PhD, DACLAM Christine Lieggi, DVM, DACLAM Kathleen Ma, DVM Heather Martin, DVM, DACLAM Sebastien Monette, DMV, MVSc, PhD, DACVP Lee-Ronn Paluch, BVSc, DACLAM Rodolfo Ricart, MLAS, DVM, DACLAM Pacific Northwest Thea Brabb, DVM, PhD, DACLAM - Coordinator Nick Reyes, DVM, DACLAM - Coordinator Jennifer Sargent, DVM, MS, DACLAM – Coordinator Jeff Stanton, DVM, MA, DACLAM – Coordinator Alan Avalos, DVM Isaac Barber-Axthelm, DVM Melissa Berg, DVM Jourdan Brune, DVM Cassandra Cullin, DVM John DenHerder, DVM Jessica Felgenhauer, DVM Terri Iwata, DVM, DACLAM Jenna Klug, DVM Becky Lovasz, DVM Stacey Meeker, DVM, DACLAM Lauren Neidig, DVM Jasmine Streeter, DVM Southeast (Georgia) Sherrie Jean, DVM, DACLAM – Coordinator Jennifer S. Wood, DVM DACLAM Southeast (North Carolina) Victoria K. Baxter, DVM, PhD, DACLAM – Coordinator Steven Shipley, DVM, DACLAM - Coordinator Cecile Baccanale, DVM Dwight Bellinger, DVM, PhD, DACLAM Calvin Carpenter, DVM DACLAM Sheba Churchill, DVM, DACLAM Jenny Estes, DVM, MS Jeffrey Everitt, DVM, DACLAM, DACVP, FIATP Craig Fletcher, DVM, PhD, DACLAM Ilana Galex, DVM, MLAS Jareca Giles, DVM Virginia Godfrey, DVM, PhD, DACVP Anna Hampton, DVM, DACLAM, DACAW, CPIA Tracy Heenan, DVM, CPIA Angela King-Herbert, DVM, DACLAM 3 2018 Exam Contributors Southeast (North Carolina) David M. Kurtz, DVM, PhD, DACLAM Kathy Laber, DVM, MS, DACLAM Chelsea D. Landon, DVM, PhD Charles Tyler Long, DVM, DACLAM, DABT, CPIA Gwendolyn McCormick, DVM, MS, DACLAM Marnie Metzler, DVM, PhD Stephanie Montgomery, DVM, PhD, DACVP Judith Nielsen, DVM, DACLAM Derek Norford, DVM, MS, PhD Karen Oppelt, DVM Dorcas O’Rourke, DVM, MS, DACLAM Nicolette Petervary, VMD, DACAW Randall Reynolds, DVM, MS, DACLAM Allison R. Rogala, DVM, DACLAM Jem Scott-Emuakpor, DVM, MBA, DACLAM Felicitas Smith, DVM, DACLAM Brittany Southern, DVM Donna Webb-Wright, DVM Julia W. Whitaker, DVM, MS, DACLAM Lauren Wimsey, DVM West Coast (Northern California) Laurie Brignolo, DVM, DACLAM - Coordinator Stephen Felt, DVM, DACLAM – Coordinator Erin Katz, DVM – Coordinator Sam Baker, MA, VetMB, DACLAM Rachel Brownlee, DVM Kathy Heng, DVM Monika Huss, DVM, MS Marie-Josee Lemoy, DVM, DACLAM Betty Ma DVM, DACLAM Alexis Mackiewicz, DVM Andrea Moffitt, DVM Claude Nagamine, DVM, PhD, DACLAM Rhonda Oates DVM, MPVM, DACLAM Gregory Simonek, DVM Jacob Theil, DVM, MPVM José G. Vilches-Moure, DVM, PhD, DACVP Amber Rae Williams, DVM Kacie Woodward, DVM Brian Zude, DVM West Coast (Southern California) Trinka Adamson, MS, DVM, DACLAM - Coordinator Ari Aycock-Williams, DVM, DACLAM Charles Cates, DVM, DACLAM Yvonne Cornejo, DVM James Finlay, DVM, PhD, DACLAM Leo Holguin, DVM Melanie Sailor, MLAS, DVM Rose Tu, DVM 4 Question 1: This handling technique is appropriate for which of the following procedures. a. Catheter placement b. Venipuncture c. Physical Exam d. Anesthesia induction e. Cystocentesis Answer: c. Physical Exam Reference: 1) Quesenberry, Katherine E., and James W. Carpenter. Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents Clinical Medicine and Surgery. Elsevier/Saunders, 2012. pp. 14. 2) Ball, R. S. “Issues to Consider for Preparing Ferrets as Research Subjects in the Laboratory.”ILAR Journal, vol. 47, no. 4, Jan. 2006, pp. 348–357. doi:10.1093/ilar.47.4.348. Domain 1- Secondary Species; Ferret (Mustela putorius furo) Question 2: According to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, what is the minimum floor space recommended when trio breeding mice (assume all adults are >25g and females are not removed once pregnant or after parturition)? a. 51 in.2 b. 75 in.2 c. 102 in.2 d. 117 in.2 e. 125 in.2 Answer: d. 117 in.2 (51 in.2 for each female + litter, plus 15 in.2 for the male) References: 1) National Research Council. 2011. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th edition. The National Academies Press: Washington, DC. Chapter 3 – Environment, Housing, and Management, p. 57. Domain 4 – Primary Species; Mouse (Mus Musculus) Question 3: Which of the following correctly describes the rack configuration in images (A) and (B) and their attributes? a. (A)-library style configuration is more efficient (B)- internal room corridor style is easier to service b. (A)- internal room corridor style is more efficient (B)-library style configuration is easier to service c. (A)- library style configuration is easier to service (B)- internal room corridor style is more efficient d. (A)- internal room corridor style is the worst ergonomical arrangement (B)- library style configuration is the best ergonomical arrangement 5 Answer: a (A)-library style configuration is more efficient (B)- internal room corridor style is easier to service References: 1) Fox JG, Anderson LC, Otto G, Pritchett-Corning KR, Whary MT, eds. 2015. Laboratory Animal Medicine, 3rd edition. Academic Press: San Diego, CA. Chapter 36 – Design and Management of Research Animal Facilities, p. 1549. 2) Hessler J, Lehner N. 2009. Planning and Designing Research Animal Facilities. 1st edition. Academic Press: San Diego, CA. Chapter 20- Rodent Facilities and Caging Systems. Domain 4; Primary Species—Mice (Mus musculus) Question 4: What strain of mouse is predisposed to this lesion? a. C57BL/6 b. C3H c. A/J d. 129 e. DBA2 Answer: d. 129 References: 1) Fox JG, Anderson LC, Otto G, Pritchett-Corning KR, Whary MT, eds. 2015. Laboratory Animal Medicine, 3rd edition. Academic Press: San Diego, CA. Chapter 3 – Biology and Diseases of Mice, p. 50. 2) Barthold SW, Griffey SM, Percy DH. 2016. Pathology of Laboratory Rodents and Rabbits, 4th edition. Wiley-Blackwell: Ames, IA. Chapter 1 – Mouse, pp. 115-116. Domain 3; Primary Species – Mouse (Mus musculus) Question 5: Which is an Aspiculuris tetraptera egg? a. A b. B c. C d. D Answer: b. B References: 1) Hedrich Hans, ed., 2004. The Laboratory Mouse. Academic Press: San Diego, CA. Chapter 3.4 – Parasitic Infections of Laboratory Mice, p. 508-509. 2) http://dora.missouri.edu/mouse/pinworms/ 3) Fox JG, Anderson LC, Otto G, Pritchett-Corning KR, Whary MT, eds. 2015. Laboratory Animal Medicine, 3rd edition. Academic Press: San Diego, CA. Chapter 3 – Biology and Diseases of Mice, p. 124-125. Domain 1; Primary species (Mus musculus) Question 6: Letter D in this illustration represents what type of equipment? a. A canopy unit for ducting a Class I biosafety cabinet 6 b. A canopy unit for ducting a Class II, type A biosafety cabinet c. A canopy unit for ducting a Class II, type B1 biosafety cabinet d. A canopy unit for ducting a Class III biosafety cabinet Answer: b. A canopy unit for ducting a Class II, type A biosafety cabinet References: 1) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institutes of Health. 2009. Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories, 5th edition. US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC. Appendix A: Biological Safety Cabinets, p. 316. Domain 5 Question 7: What does this test assess? a. Anxiety b. Learning c. Motor coordination and balance d. Exploration Answer: c. Motor coordination and balance References: 1) Crawley JN. 2003. Overview: behavioral phenotyping of rodents. Comp Med. 53(2): 140- 146. 2) Fox JG, Davisson MT, Quimby FW, Barthold SW, Newcomer CE and Smith AL, eds. 2007. The Mouse in Biomedical Research Volume III: Normative Biology, Husbandry and Models. 2nd edition. Chapter 15 – Behavioral Testing, p. 528. Domain 3; Primary Species – Mouse (Mus musculus) Question 8: A 4.5-year-old spayed ferret has a 2-year history of vulvar swelling and alopecia.
Recommended publications
  • Diet-Induced Metabolic Syndrome in Rodent Models
    Diet-Induced Metabolic Syndrome in Rodent Models A discussion of how diets made from purified ingredients influence the phenotypes of the MS in commonly used rodent models. Angela M. Gajda, MS, Michael A. Pellizzon, Ph.D., Matthew R. Ricci, Ph.D. and Edward A. Ulman, Ph.D. quick look at a crowd of people shows was not stable and periods of starvation were that many of our fellow humans are car- common, it was advantageous to have genes that rying around too much excess weight. allowed for the efficient storage of excess calories The prevalence of obesity is at epidemic as fat, given the uncertainty of when the next Alevels in the developed world, and obesity may be meal would come. In our present society, the the root cause of or precursor to other diseases problem is that we still have those ‘thrifty genes’ such as insulin resistance, abnormal blood lipid but also have a variety of foods that are high in levels (hypertriglyceridemia and reduced high saturated fat, simple sugars, and salt. density lipoprotein cholesterol), and hyperten- Unfortunately for us, many of these foods are sion (high blood pressure). The term ‘metabolic inexpensive and highly accessible (not to men- syndrome’ (MS) is used to describe the simulta- tion very tasty), and we find them easy to con- neous occurrence of these diseases and people sume in excess, leading to disease and most like- with the MS are at increased risk for type 2 dia- ly early death. On the flip side of caloric intake betes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and non- coin is the very interesting finding that long-term alcoholic fatty liver disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Mouse Models of Human Disease an Evolutionary Perspective Robert L
    170 commentary Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health [2016] pp. 170–176 doi:10.1093/emph/eow014 Mouse models of human disease An evolutionary perspective Robert L. Perlman* Department of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 5058, Chicago, IL 60637, USA *E-mail: [email protected] Received 31 December 2015; revised version accepted 12 April 2016 ABSTRACT The use of mice as model organisms to study human biology is predicated on the genetic and physio- logical similarities between the species. Nonetheless, mice and humans have evolved in and become adapted to different environments and so, despite their phylogenetic relatedness, they have become very different organisms. Mice often respond to experimental interventions in ways that differ strikingly from humans. Mice are invaluable for studying biological processes that have been conserved during the evolution of the rodent and primate lineages and for investigating the developmental mechanisms by which the conserved mammalian genome gives rise to a variety of different species. Mice are less reliable as models of human disease, however, because the networks linking genes to disease are likely to differ between the two species. The use of mice in biomedical research needs to take account of the evolved differences as well as the similarities between mice and humans. KEYWORDS: allometry; cancer; gene networks; life history; model organisms transgenic, knockout, and knockin mice, have If you have cancer and you are a mouse, we can provided added impetus and powerful tools for take good care of you. Judah Folkman [1] mouse research, and have led to a dramatic increase in the use of mice as model organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Animal Management: Rodents
    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/2119 SHARE Rodents (1996) DETAILS 180 pages | 6 x 9 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-04936-8 | DOI 10.17226/2119 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK Committee on Rodents, Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council FIND RELATED TITLES SUGGESTED CITATION National Research Council 1996. Rodents. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/2119. Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Rodents i Laboratory Animal Management Rodents Committee on Rodents Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources Commission on Life Sciences National Research Council NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C.1996 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Rodents ii National Academy Press 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20418 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Appetite for Obesity: Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Maternal Obesogenic Diets on Offspring Food Intake and Body Mass in Rodents
    International Journal of Obesity (2015) 39, 1669–1678 © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0307-0565/15 www.nature.com/ijo REVIEW Little appetite for obesity: meta-analysis of the effects of maternal obesogenic diets on offspring food intake and body mass in rodents M Lagisz1,2,3, H Blair4, P Kenyon4, T Uller5, D Raubenheimer6,7 and S Nakagawa1,2,3 BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition that maternal effects contribute to variation in individual food intake and metabolism. For example, many experimental studies on model animals have reported the effect of a maternal obesogenic diet during pregnancy on the appetite of offspring. However, the consistency of effects and the causes of variation among studies remain poorly understood. METHODS: After a systematic search for relevant publications, we selected 53 studies on rats and mice for a meta-analysis. We extracted and analysed data on the differences in food intake and body weight between offspring of dams fed obesogenic diets and dams fed standard diets during gestation. We used meta-regression to study predictors of the strength and direction of the effect sizes. RESULTS: We found that experimental offspring tended to eat more than control offspring but this difference was small and not statistically significant (0.198, 95% highest posterior density (HPD) = − 0.118–0.627). However, offspring from dams on obesogenic diets were significantly heavier than offspring of control dams (0.591, 95% HPD = 0.052–1.056). Meta-regression analysis revealed no significant influences of tested predictor variables (for example, use of choice vs no-choice maternal diet, offspring sex) on differences in offspring appetite.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Basis of Diurnal Preference in Drosophila Melanogaster 1 Mirko Pegoraro1,4, Laura M.M. Flavell1, Pamela Menegazzi2
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/380733; this version posted August 2, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 The genetic basis of diurnal preference in Drosophila melanogaster 2 Mirko Pegoraro1,4, Laura M.M. Flavell1, Pamela Menegazzi2, Perrine Colombi1, Pauline 3 Dao1, Charlotte Helfrich-Förster2 and Eran Tauber1,3 4 5 1. Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK 6 2. Neurobiology and Genetics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Germany 7 3. Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, and Institute of Evolution, 8 University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel 9 4. School of Natural Science and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, L3 3AF, UK 10 11 12 Corresponding author: E. Tauber, Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, 13 and Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel; Tel:+97248288784 14 Email: [email protected] 15 16 17 Classification: Biological Sciences (Genetics) 18 19 20 Keywords: Artificial selection, circadian clock, diurnal preference, nocturnality, 21 Drosophila 22 23 24 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/380733; this version posted August 2, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    [Show full text]
  • A Haplotype Map for the Laboratory Mouse
    NEWS AND VIEWS Sample size dictates inference dogma collection, rather than to data generation or ent experimental approaches provides insight The technical revolution that made the cur- analysis. The open question is whether the com- into mechanism and helps specify the genetic rent data boom possible has matured; genetics munity of funding agencies, peer reviewers and model. In fact, genomic convergence is a spe- laboratories now routinely generate millions of regulatory bodies will be prepared to encourage cific embodiment of the concept of ‘consilience genotypes per day. However, more data can be a and support the assembly of subjects and mate- of inductions’, formulated by William Whewell problem when we do not have the discipline to rials needed to accomplish these goals. in the 1840s11, which says that valid inductions apply the scientific method. Replication is also will be supported by data from many different a problem when working with effects so small Candidate gene success experimental approaches. that replication success could not be reasonably Rather than being discovered initially through a Although they benefit greatly from the expected, even if the marker is associated with genome-wide scan of hundreds of thousands of impressive acceleration provided by genome- the disease. genetic markers, which is now the rage, IL7R is wide scans, virtually all genetic association Larger sample size is the mantra of the hour. a candidate gene that refused to quit. Certainly, disease studies ultimately become candidate Experimentalists and funding agencies no longer the first paper on IL7R polymorphisms in mul- gene projects. Additional susceptibility genes in scoff at theoretical analyses showing that thou- tiple sclerosis7 would not have satisfied the strin- multiple sclerosis—siblings of HLA-DRB2, IL7R sands of cases and controls are needed to dem- gent replication criteria advocated by a recent and, probably, IL2RA4—might now stand above onstrate modest genetic associations (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Enrichment for Laboratory Zebrafish—A Review of the Evidence and the Challenges
    animals Review Enrichment for Laboratory Zebrafish—A Review of the Evidence and the Challenges Chloe H. Stevens *, Barney T. Reed and Penny Hawkins Animals in Science Department, RSPCA, Wilberforce Way, Southwater, West Sussex RH13 9RS, UK; [email protected] (B.T.R.); [email protected] (P.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: The zebrafish is one of the most commonly used animals in scientific research, but there remains a lack of consensus over good practice for zebrafish housing and care. One such area which lacks agreement is whether laboratory zebrafish should be provided with environmental enrichment—additions or modifications to the basic laboratory environment which aim to improve welfare, such as plastic plants in tanks. The need for the provision of appropriate environmental enrichment has been recognised in other laboratory animal species, but some scientists and animal care staff are hesitant to provide enrichment for zebrafish, arguing that there is little or no evidence that enrichment can benefit zebrafish welfare. This review aims to summarise the current literature on the effects of enrichment on zebrafish physiology, behaviour and welfare, and identifies some forms of enrichment which are likely to benefit zebrafish. It also considers the possible challenges that might be associated with introducing more enrichment, and how these might be addressed. Abstract: Good practice for the housing and care of laboratory zebrafish Danio rerio is an increasingly discussed topic, with focus on appropriate water quality parameters, stocking densities, feeding Citation: Stevens, C.H.; Reed, B.T.; regimes, anaesthesia and analgesia practices, methods of humane killing, and more.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Analysis of Complex Traits in the Emerging Collaborative Cross
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 5, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Research Genetic analysis of complex traits in the emerging Collaborative Cross David L. Aylor,1 William Valdar,1,13 Wendy Foulds-Mathes,1,13 Ryan J. Buus,1,13 Ricardo A. Verdugo,2,13 Ralph S. Baric,3,4 Martin T. Ferris,1 Jeff A. Frelinger,4 Mark Heise,1 Matt B. Frieman,4 Lisa E. Gralinski,4 Timothy A. Bell,1 John D. Didion,1 Kunjie Hua,1 Derrick L. Nehrenberg,1 Christine L. Powell,1 Jill Steigerwalt,5 Yuying Xie,1 Samir N.P. Kelada,6 Francis S. Collins,6 Ivana V. Yang,7 David A. Schwartz,7 Lisa A. Branstetter,8 Elissa J. Chesler,2 Darla R. Miller,1 Jason Spence,1 Eric Yi Liu,9 Leonard McMillan,9 Abhishek Sarkar,9 Jeremy Wang,9 Wei Wang,9 Qi Zhang,9 Karl W. Broman,10 Ron Korstanje,2 Caroline Durrant,11 Richard Mott,11 Fuad A. Iraqi,12 Daniel Pomp,1,14 David Threadgill,5,14 Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena,1,14 and Gary A. Churchill2,14 1Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA; 2The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609, USA; 3Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA; 4Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA; 5Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA; 6Genome Technology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
    [Show full text]
  • THE POWER of LABORATORY MICE Since the First Published Study Using Mice in 1844, Over 1.4 Million Scholarly Articles Have Been Published
    THE POWER OF LABORATORY MICE Since the first published study using mice in 1844, over 1.4 million scholarly articles have been published. Over half of those articles have been published in the past 2 decades and twice as many were published in the decade 2007—2016 than 1997—2006. These data demonstrate the increasing value of laboratory mice in biomedical research. Genetically engineered mice bolstered this growth by improving the ability to translate results to humans. Looking forward, the laboratory mouse will continue to play a critical role in biomedical research, as the ability to generate increasingly precise models will give the researcher of tomorrow an animal that has power to further our understanding of complex human biology. MOUSE VS. HUMAN = HOW MANY STRAINS HAVE BEEN GENERATED? TYPES OF LAB MICE 70 37 °C PERCENTAGE OF USE = 21 REPOSITORIES CRYOPRESERVED 199,892 AVERAGE = = OUTBRED 70 BODY 20,390 ES CELL STRAINS 70 70 37 °C37 °C37 °C 38% Production of offspring from mating of unrelated individuals. TEMPERATURE EMBRYO STRAINS Outbred breeding maintains genetic diversity. AVERAGE LIFE SPAN 1.5 AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE Learn more about outbred mice NUMBER OF BODY BODY BODY YEARS TEMPERATURE AVERAGE LIFE SPAN 1.5 TEMPERATURETEMPERATURE IN VITRO AVERAGE LIFE SPAN AVERAGE LIFE SPAN 1.5 1.5 3,955 26,172 236,927 NUMBER OF NUMBER NUMBEROF OF YEARS LIVE SPERM TOTAL ENTRIES 20 grYEARS YEARS (LIVE, SPERM, EMBRYO, ES CELL) 20 gr20 gr20 gr Source: International Mouse Strain Repository INBRED AVERAGE WEIGHT Production of offspring from mating of male and female mice that are 68AVERAGE kg WEIGHT AVERAGE WEIGHTAVERAGE WEIGHT 68 kg closely related genetically, typically brother x sister mating.
    [Show full text]
  • Chewing and Sucking Lice As Parasites of Iviammals and Birds
    c.^,y ^r-^ 1 Ag84te DA Chewing and Sucking United States Lice as Parasites of Department of Agriculture IVIammals and Birds Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1849 July 1997 0 jc: United States Department of Agriculture Chewing and Sucking Agricultural Research Service Lice as Parasites of Technical Bulletin Number IVIammals and Birds 1849 July 1997 Manning A. Price and O.H. Graham U3DA, National Agrioultur«! Libmry NAL BIdg 10301 Baltimore Blvd Beltsvjlle, MD 20705-2351 Price (deceased) was professor of entomoiogy, Department of Ento- moiogy, Texas A&iVI University, College Station. Graham (retired) was research leader, USDA-ARS Screwworm Research Laboratory, Tuxtia Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico. ABSTRACT Price, Manning A., and O.H. Graham. 1996. Chewing This publication reports research involving pesticides. It and Sucking Lice as Parasites of Mammals and Birds. does not recommend their use or imply that the uses U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesti- 1849, 309 pp. cides must be registered by appropriate state or Federal agencies or both before they can be recommended. In all stages of their development, about 2,500 species of chewing lice are parasites of mammals or birds. While supplies last, single copies of this publication More than 500 species of blood-sucking lice attack may be obtained at no cost from Dr. O.H. Graham, only mammals. This publication emphasizes the most USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 969, Mission, TX 78572. Copies frequently seen genera and species of these lice, of this publication may be purchased from the National including geographic distribution, life history, habitats, Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, ecology, host-parasite relationships, and economic Springfield, VA 22161.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pathogenesis of Spontaneous Autoimmune Peripheral Polyneuropathy: the Nod.B7-2-/- Mouse As a Model for Guillain Barré Syndrome
    THE PATHOGENESIS OF SPONTANEOUS AUTOIMMUNE PERIPHERAL POLYNEUROPATHY: THE NOD.B7-2-/- MOUSE AS A MODEL FOR GUILLAIN BARRÉ SYNDROME By Barbie J. Gadsden A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Comparative Medicine and Integrative Biology—Doctor of Philosophy 2016 ABSTRACT THE PATHOGENESIS OF SPONTANEOUS AUTOIMMUNE PERIPHERAL POLYNEUROPATHY: THE NOD.B7-2-/- MOUSE AS A MODEL FOR GUILLAIN BARRÉ SYNDROME By Barbie J. Gadsden Guillain Barré Syndrome (GBS) is a symmetrical ascending paralysis that often follows viral or bacterial infection. The foodborne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni is the most common infection that triggers GBS, but C. jejuni is mainly linked to one variant within a complex syndrome: Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy (AMAN). One third of AMAN patients have IgG autoantibodies against neurogangliosides GM1 and GD1a; binding of these antibodies to peripheral nerves is thought to initiate nerve damage. Other GBS variants include Acute Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy (AIDP), Acute Motor and Sensory Axonal Neuropathy (AMSAN), and Miller Fisher Syndrome (MFS). The triggers for these disorders are not known and a large number of potential infectious and noninfectious initiating causes have been implicated. In addition to C. jejuni, bacteria such as Mycoplasma pneumonia and Haemophilus influenzae and viruses such as Cytomegalovirus and Influenza have been associated with GBS. GBS disease is monophasic; recurrence is rare, but has been reported. Patients in the initial stages of GBS report headache and joint pain. Tingling and numbness of extremities is followed by segmental ascending paralysis. Pain involving the extremities occurs later in the course of the disease and can be directly correlated with disease severity.
    [Show full text]
  • Rattus Norvegicus and Mus Musculus
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. I Behavioural Ecology of New Zealand Invasive Rodents (Rattus norvegicus and Mus musculus): Implications for Rodent Control A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology at Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand Idan Shapira 2013 II FRONTISPIECE Walter: And let's also not forget… let's not forget, Dude… that keeping wildlife, an amphibious rodent, for uh, domestic, you know, within the city… that isn't legal either. Dude: What're you, a fucking park ranger now? (Ethan and Joel Coen, “The Big Lebowski”) III ABSTRACT Biological invasions are natural phenomena that have occurred throughout the natural history of earth. The highly negative context of the term biological invasion is associated with the fact that many modern invasive processes are anthropogenically driven. Indeed, human affiliated invasions are among the primary drivers of the current biodiversity crises. Murid rodents (Rodentia: Muridea) of the genus Rattus and Mus have become among the worst vertebrate invasive species and apart from man are the most widespread mammals on earth. Invasive rodents have severe and negative effects on human health, agricultural systems, and natural environments. The practice of rodent control is extensive and substantial attempts are made to decrease rodents’ severe impacts on the environment. However, although these attempts are largely successful, there are still issues in the control of invasive rodents and new methodologies, whether at a macro or micro scale are actively pursued.
    [Show full text]