Rat Biomethodology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Diet-Induced Metabolic Syndrome in Rodent Models
Diet-Induced Metabolic Syndrome in Rodent Models A discussion of how diets made from purified ingredients influence the phenotypes of the MS in commonly used rodent models. Angela M. Gajda, MS, Michael A. Pellizzon, Ph.D., Matthew R. Ricci, Ph.D. and Edward A. Ulman, Ph.D. quick look at a crowd of people shows was not stable and periods of starvation were that many of our fellow humans are car- common, it was advantageous to have genes that rying around too much excess weight. allowed for the efficient storage of excess calories The prevalence of obesity is at epidemic as fat, given the uncertainty of when the next Alevels in the developed world, and obesity may be meal would come. In our present society, the the root cause of or precursor to other diseases problem is that we still have those ‘thrifty genes’ such as insulin resistance, abnormal blood lipid but also have a variety of foods that are high in levels (hypertriglyceridemia and reduced high saturated fat, simple sugars, and salt. density lipoprotein cholesterol), and hyperten- Unfortunately for us, many of these foods are sion (high blood pressure). The term ‘metabolic inexpensive and highly accessible (not to men- syndrome’ (MS) is used to describe the simulta- tion very tasty), and we find them easy to con- neous occurrence of these diseases and people sume in excess, leading to disease and most like- with the MS are at increased risk for type 2 dia- ly early death. On the flip side of caloric intake betes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and non- coin is the very interesting finding that long-term alcoholic fatty liver disease. -
Laboratory Animal Management: Rodents
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/2119 SHARE Rodents (1996) DETAILS 180 pages | 6 x 9 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-04936-8 | DOI 10.17226/2119 CONTRIBUTORS GET THIS BOOK Committee on Rodents, Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council FIND RELATED TITLES SUGGESTED CITATION National Research Council 1996. Rodents. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/2119. Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Rodents i Laboratory Animal Management Rodents Committee on Rodents Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources Commission on Life Sciences National Research Council NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C.1996 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Rodents ii National Academy Press 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20418 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. -
Technical Considerations for Pen, Jet, and Related Injectors Intended for Use with Drugs and Biological Products
Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff: Technical Considerations for Pen, Jet, and Related Injectors Intended for Use with Drugs and Biological Products Additional copies are available from: Office of Combination Products Office of Special Medical Programs Office of the Commissioner Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, WO-32 Hub 5129 Silver Spring, MD 20993 (Tel) 301-796-8930 (Fax) 301-796-8619 http://www.fda.gov/CombinationProducts/default.htm This document finalizes the draft guidance issued in April 2009. For questions regarding this document, contact the Office of Combination Products at [email protected] or Patricia Y. Love, MD at 301-796-8933 or [email protected] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Center for Drug Evaluation Research, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, and Office of Combination Products in the Office of the Commissioner June 2013 Contains Nonbinding Recommendations Table of Contents INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................4 SECTION I: SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS.............................5 A. INJECTOR DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................5 B. DESIGN FEATURES.........................................................................................................9 -
Little Appetite for Obesity: Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Maternal Obesogenic Diets on Offspring Food Intake and Body Mass in Rodents
International Journal of Obesity (2015) 39, 1669–1678 © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0307-0565/15 www.nature.com/ijo REVIEW Little appetite for obesity: meta-analysis of the effects of maternal obesogenic diets on offspring food intake and body mass in rodents M Lagisz1,2,3, H Blair4, P Kenyon4, T Uller5, D Raubenheimer6,7 and S Nakagawa1,2,3 BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition that maternal effects contribute to variation in individual food intake and metabolism. For example, many experimental studies on model animals have reported the effect of a maternal obesogenic diet during pregnancy on the appetite of offspring. However, the consistency of effects and the causes of variation among studies remain poorly understood. METHODS: After a systematic search for relevant publications, we selected 53 studies on rats and mice for a meta-analysis. We extracted and analysed data on the differences in food intake and body weight between offspring of dams fed obesogenic diets and dams fed standard diets during gestation. We used meta-regression to study predictors of the strength and direction of the effect sizes. RESULTS: We found that experimental offspring tended to eat more than control offspring but this difference was small and not statistically significant (0.198, 95% highest posterior density (HPD) = − 0.118–0.627). However, offspring from dams on obesogenic diets were significantly heavier than offspring of control dams (0.591, 95% HPD = 0.052–1.056). Meta-regression analysis revealed no significant influences of tested predictor variables (for example, use of choice vs no-choice maternal diet, offspring sex) on differences in offspring appetite. -
The Genetic Basis of Diurnal Preference in Drosophila Melanogaster 1 Mirko Pegoraro1,4, Laura M.M. Flavell1, Pamela Menegazzi2
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/380733; this version posted August 2, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 The genetic basis of diurnal preference in Drosophila melanogaster 2 Mirko Pegoraro1,4, Laura M.M. Flavell1, Pamela Menegazzi2, Perrine Colombi1, Pauline 3 Dao1, Charlotte Helfrich-Förster2 and Eran Tauber1,3 4 5 1. Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK 6 2. Neurobiology and Genetics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Germany 7 3. Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, and Institute of Evolution, 8 University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel 9 4. School of Natural Science and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, L3 3AF, UK 10 11 12 Corresponding author: E. Tauber, Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, 13 and Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel; Tel:+97248288784 14 Email: [email protected] 15 16 17 Classification: Biological Sciences (Genetics) 18 19 20 Keywords: Artificial selection, circadian clock, diurnal preference, nocturnality, 21 Drosophila 22 23 24 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/380733; this version posted August 2, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. -
Drug Delivery Products
INDUSTRY MARKET RESEARCH FOR BUSINESS LEADERS, STRATEGISTS, DECISION MAKERS CLICK TO VIEW Table of Contents 2 List of Tables & Charts 3 Study Overview 4 Sample Text, Table & Chart 5 Sample Profile, Table & Forecast 6 Order Form & Corporate Use License 7 About Freedonia, Custom Research, Related Studies, 8 Drug Delivery Products US Industry Study with Forecasts for 2015 & 2020 Study #2829 | January 2012 | $4800 | 337 pages The Freedonia Group 767 Beta Drive www.freedoniagroup.com Cleveland, OH • 44143-2326 • USA Toll Free US Tel: 800.927.5900 or +1 440.684.9600 Fax: +1 440.646.0484 E-mail: [email protected] Study #2829 January 2012 Drug Delivery Products $4800 337 Pages US Industry Study with Forecasts for 2015 & 2020 Table of Contents Starch Compounds ...................................62 Infusion Pumps ..................................... 150 Cyclodextrins .......................................62 Other Infusion Products .......................... 152 Dextrates ............................................62 Enteral Feeding Supplies ..................... 152 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dextrin ...............................................63 IV Accessories ................................... 153 Maltodextrin ........................................63 Parenteral Drug Delivery Devices .................. 154 MARKET ENVIRONMENT Sugars & Polyols ......................................63 Prefillable Syringes ................................ 155 Sucrose ...............................................63 Injectors .......................................... -
2020 AAHA Anesthesia and Monitoring Guidelines for Dogs and Cats*
VETERINARY PRACTICE GUIDELINES 2020 AAHA Anesthesia and Monitoring Guidelines for Dogs and Cats* Tamara Grubb, DVM, PhD, DACVAAy, Jennifer Sager, BS, CVT, VTS (Anesthesia/Analgesia, ECC)y, James S. Gaynor, DVM, MS, DACVAA, DAIPM, CVA, CVPP, Elizabeth Montgomery, DVM, MPH, Judith A. Parker, DVM, DABVP, Heidi Shafford, DVM, PhD, DACVAA, Caitlin Tearney, DVM, DACVAA ABSTRACT Risk for complications and even death is inherent to anesthesia. However, the use of guidelines, checklists, and training can decrease the risk of anesthesia-related adverse events. These tools should be used not only during the time the patient is unconscious but also before and after this phase. The framework for safe anesthesia delivered as a continuum of care from home to hospital and back to home is presented in these guidelines. The critical importance of client commu- nication and staff training have been highlighted. The role of perioperative analgesia, anxiolytics, and proper handling of fractious/fearful/aggressive patients as components of anesthetic safety are stressed. Anesthesia equipment selection and care is detailed. The objective of these guidelines is to make the anesthesia period as safe as possible for dogs and cats while providing a practical framework for delivering anesthesia care. To meet this goal, tables, algorithms, figures, and “tip” boxes with critical information are included in the manuscript and an in-depth online resource center is available at aaha.org/anesthesia. (J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2020; 56:---–---. DOI 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-7055) AFFILIATIONS Other recommendations are based on practical clinical experience and From Washington State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Pullman, a consensus of expert opinion. -
United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9.458,536 B2 Felts Et Al
USOO9458536B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9.458,536 B2 Felts et al. (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 4, 2016 (54) PECVD COATING METHODS FOR CAPPED (52) U.S. Cl. SYRINGES, CARTRIDGES AND OTHER CPC ........... C23C 16/401 (2013.01); A61 B 5/1405 ARTICLES (2013.01); A61 B 5/153 (2013.01); (71) Applicants: John T. Felts, Alameda, CA (US); (Continued)Continued Thomas E. Fisk, Green Valley, AZ (58) Field of Classification Search (US); Shawn Kinney, Wayland, MA CPC ... A61M 5/178; C23C 16/045; A61L 31/08; (US); Christopher Weikart, Auburn, A61L 31/14 AL (US); Benjamin Hunt, Auburn, AL USPC . 427/2.28, 2.1, 230, 237, 569 (US); Adrian Raiche, Auburn, AL Seeee applicationa1Ca1O fileTO f CO.plet SeaClh history1SOW. (US); Brian Fitzpatrick, West Chester, (56) References Cited PA (US); Peter J. Sagona, Pottstown, PA (US); Adam Stevenson, Opelika, U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS AL (US) 3,274,267 A 9, 1966 Chow (72) Inventors: John T. Felts, Alameda, CA (US); 3,297,465. A 1, 1967 Connel Thomas E. Fisk, Green Valley, AZ (Continued) (US); Shawn Kinney, Wayland, MA (US); Christopher Weikart, Auburn, FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS AL (US); Benjamin Hunt, Auburn, AL (US); Adrian Raiche, Auburn, AL A. SSR, 1939. (US); Brian Fitzpatrick, West Chester, Continued PA (US); Peter J. Sagona, Pottstown, (Continued) PA (US); Adam Stevenson, Opelika, AL (US) OTHER PUBLICATIONS Hanlon, Adriene Lepiane, Pak, Chung K. Pawlikowski, Beverly A. (73) Assignee: s MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., Decision on Appeal. Appeal No. 2005-1693, U.S. Appl. No. Auburn, AL (US) 10/192,333, dated Sep. -
Montgomery Preloading
MEDICAL PRELOADING PACKING LIST QTY PACKED DESCRIPTION 12 PALLETS ADULT DIPPERS AND OTHER INCONSTANCE SUPPLY NEW 2 PALLETS ORTHOPEDIC SUPPLY (CASTING MATERIALS, BOOTS ETC. NEW 5 BOXES SHOWER/COMMODE CHAIRS NEW 20 BOXES HOSPITAL PATIENT'S PILLOWS NEW 3 LOOSE WHEELCHAIRS USED 100 LOOSE WALKERS USED 20 LOOSE CANES USED 25 BOXES HOSPITAL LINENS USED 3 LOOSE STANDUP SCALE USED 3 LOOSE GURNEY USED 5 LOOSE HOME MEDICAL BEDS USED 1 LOOSE OPERATING TABLE USED 2 LOOSE AUTOCLAVE USED 1 LOOSE BEDSIDE TABLES USED 1 LOOSE CAFETERIA WARMING TABLE FOR PLATES USED 2 PALLETS urinary catheters NEW 2 PALLETS ostomy products NEW 2 PALLETS feeding tube supplies NEW 2 LOOSE SPINAL SURGICAL BEDS USED 2 LOOSE DENTAL CHAIRS USED 2 LOOSE DENTAL CHAIRS WITH ATTACHED CABINET/TRAY USED 5 LOOSE FILING CABINETS USED 23 PALLETS MEDICAL DISPOSABLE SUPPLY (DETAILS BELOW) NEW PALLET # BOX # DESCRIPTION EXP DATE 1-50 A-01 Needle Disposable 1-50 A-01 Safety Glide Combo 3ML 1-50 A-01 Syr/Ndl Combo Safety 1cc 9/26/2023 1-50 A-01 Syringe W/o Needle TB 1cc 1-50 A-01 Syringes w/Needle LL Disp 3cc 1-50 A-01 IRRIGATION SYRG 1-50 A-01 NEBULIZER CAPS 1-50 A-01 PISTON IRRIGATION TRAY 1-50 A-02 VITAL WRAP SYSTEM 1-50 A-03 GRANFOAM DRESSING 11/30/2021 1-50 A-03 LUER LOCK TIP SYRINGE 1-50 A-03 FLUID PATH 12/1/2023 1-50 A-03 HYPODERM NEEDLE 10/1/2023 1-50 A-03 NEEDLES MIX 9/19/2021 1-50 A-03 DRESSINGS 12/31/2021 1-50 A-03 EXTENTN SET 8/1/2024 1-50 A-03 NEBULIZER CAPS 1-50 A-03 IRRIGATION TRAY 1-50 A-03 UTRA FLEX SELF ADHERING MLE EXTR CATH 10/28/2022 1-50 A-03 UROSTOMY DRANE TUBE ADOPTER -
Comparative Hypodermic Needle Sharpness Among Major Brands
Comparative Hypodermic Needle Sharpness Among Major Brands: Results of an Independent Study Background This study compared needles made by Terumo with those made by Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD), It is generally accepted that needle sharpness is a Covidien (manufacturer of Kendall™ and Monoject™ key feature of any well-designed syringe with needle. brands), and Nipro Medical Corporation. To ensure Sharper needles provide patients with more comfortable objectivity, tests were conducted by DDL, an injections, thereby providing both patient and clinician independent laboratory in Eden Prairie, Minnesota, with a more satisfying injection experience. under controlled conditions in accordance with Does needle sharpness vary from brand to brand? Are applicable standard good laboratory practices.* one manufacturer’s needles generally sharper than those of another? These questions are answered by Sharpness test methodology this study, which assessed and quantified comparative This evaluation was based on the hypothesis that needle sharpness among major brands commonly used a sharper needle would require less force to penetrate in today’s clinical settings. standardized, surrogate skin material. The test scenario most important to The 2 tests (with and without vial penetration) involved patient comfort—skin injection quantitatively measuring the force needed to penetrate this material. To quantify relative sharpness, penetration Needles and syringes are commonly used for drawing up force was measured using Instron® testing equipment medications, mixing medications, accessing ports, and with a load cell—a standard device for measuring skin injection. The goal of this study was to determine needle penetration force. relative needle sharpness specifically for skin injection— the use that most affects patient comfort. -
(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/0051466A1 FARR Et Al
US 2016.005 1466A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/0051466A1 FARR et al. (43) Pub. Date: Feb. 25, 2016 (54) NOVEL FORMULATIONS FORTREATMENT Publication Classification OF MIGRAINE (51) Int. Cl. 71) Applipplicant: ZOGENIX,9 INC.... E.EmeryV1lle, ille, CA (US A619/00 2006.O1 A613 L/478 (2006.01) (72) Inventors: Stephen J. FARR, Orinda, CA (US); A613 L/4045 (2006.01) John TURANIN, Danville, CA (US); (52) U.S. Cl. Roger HAWLEY, Rancho Santa Fe, CA CPC ........... A61 K9/0019 (2013.01); A61 K3I/4045 SS Jeffrey A. Schuster, Bolinas, CA (2013.01); A61 K31/4178 (2013.01) (57) ABSTRACT (21) Appl. No.: 14/930,982 Systems and methods are described for treating un-met medi (22) Filed: Nov. 3, 2015 cal needs in migraine and related conditions such as cluster headache. Included are treatments that are both rapid onset Related U.S. Application Data and long acting, which include Sustained release formula tions, and combination products. Also included are treat (60) Continuationonunuation oIof application No. 13/863,686,oso, filedIlled on ments ford multiplecombination symptoms products. of migraine, Also included especially head Apr.of 16, 2013, which is a division220 of application No. acheh andd nausea andd Vomiting. Systems thath are se1f filed as -application - - - No. PCT/US2009/002533• 1s s on Apr.s contained, portable, prefilled, and simple to self administer at 24, 2009 the onset of a migraine attack a disclosed, and preferably s include a needle-free injector and a high Viscosity formula (60) Provisional application No. 61/048.463, filed on Apr. -
Delivery Systems Equipment
CHAPTER 4 Delivery Systems Equipment CHAPTER OBJECTIVES ■ Identify the different parts of a syringe. ■ Identify the different types of syringes available and their unique characteristics. ■ Select the appropriate syringe to measure a given volume based on the syringe’s calibrations. ■ Identify the different parts of the needle. ■ Describe fi lter needles, fi lter straws, and vented needles. ■ Identify when a fi lter needle or fi lter straw is used. ■ Identify when a vented needle is used. ■ Describe the fi lters used to sterilize products. ■ Explain the advantages of a needleless system. ■ Explain the difference between large-volume parenterals and piggybacks. ■ Compare the advantages and disadvantages of glass bottles versus plastic bags. ■ Explain the characteristics of a single-dose vial and a multiple-dose vial. ■ Describe the advantages and disadvantages of vials and ampules. ■ Explain HEPA fi ltration. ■ Compare and contrast the use of laminar airfl ow workbenches (LAFWs), biological safety cabinets (BSCs), and compounding aseptic isolators. ■ Describe the proper cleaning procedures for an airfl ow hood. KEY TERMS ampule—a sealed glass container that contains a single dose fi lter straws—thin, sterile straws with a fi lter molded into of medication the hub; used to draw fl uid from an ampule bevel—the slanted, pointed tip of a needle gauge—the diameter of the opening of a needle, or the biological safety cabinet (BSC)—a vertical fl ow hood that lumen uses HEPA-fi ltered air that fl ows vertically (from the top HEPA fi lter—a high-effi ciency particulate