Clonal Structure in the Moss, Climacium Americanum Brid

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Clonal Structure in the Moss, Climacium Americanum Brid Heredity 64 (1990) 233—238 The Genetical Society of Great Britain Received 25August1989 Clonal structure in the moss, Climacium americanum Brid. Thomas R. Meagher* and * Departmentof Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, P.O. Box 1059, Jonathan Shawt Piscataway, NJ 08855-1059. 1 Department of Biology, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY 14850. The present study focussed on the moss species, Climacium americanum Brid., which typically grows in the form of mats or clumps of compactly spaced gametophores. In order to determine the clonal structure of these clumps, the distribution of genetic variation was analysed by an electrophoretic survey. Ten individual gametophores from each of ten clumps were sampled in two locations in the Piedmont of North Carolina. These samples were assayed for allelic variation at six electrophoretically distinguishable loci. For each clump, an explicit probability of a monomorphic versus a polymorphic sample was estimated based on allele frequencies in our overall sample. Although allelic variation was detected within clumps at both localities, our statistical results showed that the level of polymorphism within clumps was less than would be expected if genetic variation were distributed at random within the overall population. INTRODUCTION approximately 50 per cent of moss species that are hermaphroditic, self-fertilization of bisexual Ithas been recognized that in many taxa asexual gametophytes results in completely homozygous propagation as the predominant means of repro- sporophytes. Dispersal of such genetically iden- duction does not necessarily lead to genetic tical spores is functionally equivalent to asexual monomorphism (Bell, 1982; Silander, 1979; reproduction. Vrijenhoek, 1984). Indeed, localized patterns of Mosses are believed to be relatively depauper- allozymic variation have been useful tools for iden- ate in genetic variation (Crum, 1973), a circum- tifying the spatial extent of individual clones within stance which may reflect the predominance of plant populations (Silander, 1979) and for recog- asexual propagation as the most successful life nizing different clones in unisexual fish popula- history mode. Many bryophyte systematists believe tions (Vrijenhoek et a!., 1978). In order to under- that mosses evolve relatively slowly (Anderson, stand how genetic variation is maintained in 1963; Khanna, 1964), a view based largely on asexual populations, it is first necessary to deter- biogeographic observations. The geographic distri- mine the distribution of such genetic variation and butions of most species are relatively broad, and relate that distribution to the overall breeding intercontinentalrangedisjunctions without morphological differentiation are common. While system. Most species of mosses are believed to repro- some bryologists have assumed that almost all duce both sexually by spore formation, and moss reproduction is by means other than sexual asexually by a variety of methods (Longton, 1976; spores (e.g., Anderson, 1963), extremely little Wyatt, 1982; Wyatt and Anderson, 1984). Asexual information is available about how mosses actually reproduction in this group can occur by vegetative do reproduce under natural conditions. fragmentation, in which pieces of gametophytic Bryophytes in general, and mosses in par- plants are broken off and reestablish elsewhere, ticular, have been increasingly recognized as useful by the formation and dispersal of specialized organisms for studying a variety of concepts in reproductive structures such as axillary gemmae population biology (During and van Tooren, 1987; or rhizoidal tubers (Correns, 1899), or by the Wyatt, 1982). The reasons for this recent increase growth of localized clones. Moreover, within the in awareness of mosses as research tools are 234 T. R. MEAGHER AND J. SHAW several-fold. These plants exhibit unusual features creek crosses Old Erwin Road. The ecological for terrestrial plants, such as a conspicuous alterna- features of these sites were similar to those tion of generations with the haploid form perennial described for nearby populations of C. americanum and freeliving. Since the predominant growth form characterized in Shaw et al. (1987). In each site, is haploid, population genetic studies are greatly ten individual gametophores were sampled from simplified. Also, this group has been relatively each of ten distinct clumps. Clumps ranged in size overlooked so that virtually any population bio- from 13 cm to 100 cm in diameter, and logy study represents a novelty. gametophores were sampled evenly over a 13 cm Ironically, the fact that mosses have been rela- diameter portion of each clump. These tively understudied is a weakness as well as a gametophores were placed in plastic vials and strength. Even basic information about population stored at —70°C for several weeks until they were structure and dynamics are poorly understood for subjected to electrophoretic analysis. many species, hindering detailed investigations. Enzyme extraction was performed by grinding Many moss species occur as compact clumps of each sample in liquid nitrogen and then suspend- gametophores. The genotypic composition of such ing them in an extraction buffer of 0.1 M tris-HCI clumps, however, is generally not known. Each (pH 7.2) buffer with 0.5 per cent mercaptoethanol. clump could represent a collection of clonal ramets Extracts were absorbed onto filter paper wicks of the same genotype (as is commonly assumed in which were loaded directly into 12 per cent many bryological studies) or, alternatively, they horizontal starch gels. Following electrophoresis, could represent an aggregation of co-occurring enzyme assays were conducted for six systems that distinct genotypes. The differences between these had been found in our previous investigation to possibilitieshave significantand obvious be polymorphic: alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), ramifications for microevolutionary processes in acid phosphatase (ACP), fluorescent esterase moss populations. (EST5), peroxidase (PER), phosphoglucomutase The present study was focussed on the moss (PGM), and superoxide dismutase (SOD). The species, Climacium americanum Brid., commonly electrophoretic and staining protocols for C. amer- known as the "tree moss" because of its dendroid icanum are outlined in detail in Shaw eta!. (1987). growth form. Sexual reproduction, as evidenced For each clump, an explicit probability of by sporophyte formation, is extremely rare in C. observing a monomorphic versus a polymorphic americanum (Shaw et a!., 1987). The species sample was estimated based on allele frequencies occupies a broad geographic range in the eastern in our overall sample. For a haploid organism, United States, from Nova Scotia and Wisconsin these probabilities for a given sample size can be south to Florida and Kansas (Crum and Anderson, calculated by use of a binomial expansion series 1981). The typical growth habit for this species is (table 1; Feller, 1968). Thus for a sample of n the formation of discreet mats or clumps along gametophores, and a diallelic locus with allele stream margins and on flood plains. These clumps frequencies Pi and P2, the probability of are generally small (Ca. <60 cm2), but are occasion- monomorphism would be ally more extensive. In order to determine the genetic structure of these clumps in C. americanum, P, (monomorphism) =(p'+p°) the distribution of genetic variation was analysed for the ith locus. A combined probability across by an electrophoretic survey of two natural popula- multiple loci can be obtained by multiplying tions. Table 1 Probability distribution of a sample of 10 haploid MATERIALSAND METHODS genotypes within clumps based on population allele frequencies Pt and P2 Clumpsof C. americanum were sampled in two Ratio of Ratio of locations in the Piedmont of North Carolina. The g1 to g2 Probability g1 to g2 Probability first sample site was on the flood plain of the Eno River 50 m downstream from its intersection with 10:0 p° 4:6 210pp Guess Road in the city of Durham (Durham 9:1 10p'p2 3:7 120pp County, NC). The second sample site was located 8:2 45pp 2:8 45pp in the Korstian Division of the Duke Forest 7:3 120p,p 1:9 10pp 6:4 210pp 0:10 (Orange County, NC) along New Hope Creek 5:5 approximately 200 m upstream from where the 252pp CLONAL STRUCTURE IN CLIMACIUM AMER/CANUM 235 together all of the P,assumingthe loci are variation was predominantly due to variation unlinked. A combined probability that a clump between clumps rather than to variation within will be polymorphic for at least one locus can be clumps (tables 3—4). obtained by subtracting the combined probability In our previous results (Shaw et a!., 1987) of monomorphism from 1. Within each site, demonstrated that two varieties of C.americanum explicit probabilities of monomorphism versus which differ in morphology can also be distin- polymorphism were calculated for each clump guished by their enzyme phenotypes coded by sampled using the cumulative allele frequencies several loci. In the Eno River sample, nine of observed for that site. Clumps varied in these prob- the clumps showed a PGM enzyme pattern abilities due to small differences in sample size. characteristic of Climacium americanum var. americanum and the remaining clump was clearly var. kindbergii. Within clump allelic variation RESULTS was restricted to the PER locus, although allelic variation among clumps was observed for ACP, Fourof the six enzymes assayed showed poly- PGM, and SOD as well (table 3). morphism in the Eno River collection,
Recommended publications
  • Household and Personal Uses
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Household and Personal Uses. Chapt. 1-1. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 5. Uses. Ebook sponsored 1-1-1 by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 5 October 2017 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 1 HOUSEHOLD AND PERSONAL USES TABLE OF CONTENTS Household Uses...................................................................................................................................................1-1-2 Furnishings...................................................................................................................................................1-1-4 Padding and Absorption...............................................................................................................................1-1-5 Mattresses.............................................................................................................................................1-1-6 Shower Mat...........................................................................................................................................1-1-7 Urinal Absorption.................................................................................................................................1-1-8 Cleaning.......................................................................................................................................................1-1-8 Brushes and Brooms.............................................................................................................................1-1-8
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to the Moss Genera in New Jersey by Keith Bowman
    Field Guide to the Moss Genera in New Jersey With Coefficient of Conservation and Indicator Status Keith Bowman, PhD 10/20/2017 Acknowledgements There are many individuals that have been essential to this project. Dr. Eric Karlin compiled the initial annotated list of New Jersey moss taxa. Second, I would like to recognize the contributions of the many northeastern bryologists that aided in the development of the initial coefficient of conservation values included in this guide including Dr. Richard Andrus, Dr. Barbara Andreas, Dr. Terry O’Brien, Dr. Scott Schuette, and Dr. Sean Robinson. I would also like to acknowledge the valuable photographic contributions from Kathleen S. Walz, Dr. Robert Klips, and Dr. Michael Lüth. Funding for this project was provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, State Wetlands Protection Development Grant, Section 104(B)(3); CFDA No. 66.461, CD97225809. Recommended Citation: Bowman, Keith. 2017. Field Guide to the Moss Genera in New Jersey With Coefficient of Conservation and Indicator Status. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, New Jersey Forest Service, Office of Natural Lands Management, Trenton, NJ, 08625. Submitted to United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, State Wetlands Protection Development Grant, Section 104(B)(3); CFDA No. 66.461, CD97225809. i Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Descriptions
    [Show full text]
  • Water Relations: Conducting Structures
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Water Relations: Conducting Structures. Chapt. 7-1. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. Physiological 7-1-1 Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 7 March 2017 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 7-1 WATER RELATIONS: CONDUCTING STRUCTURES TABLE OF CONTENTS Movement to Land .............................................................................................................................................. 7-1-2 Bryophytes as Sponges ....................................................................................................................................... 7-1-2 Conducting Structure .......................................................................................................................................... 7-1-4 Leptomes and Hydromes............................................................................................................................. 7-1-8 Hydroids............................................................................................................................................. 7-1-12 Leptoids.............................................................................................................................................. 7-1-14 Rhizome..................................................................................................................................................... 7-1-15 Leaves.......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Baseline Study of Alpine Snowbed and Rill Communities on Mount Washington, Nh Author(S): Robert S
    A Baseline Study of Alpine Snowbed and Rill Communities On Mount Washington, Nh Author(s): Robert S. Capers Nancy G. Slack Source: Rhodora, 118(976):345-381. Published By: The New England Botanical Club, Inc. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3119/16-07 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3119/16-07 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. RHODORA, Vol. 118, No. 976, pp. 345–381, 2016 Ó Copyright 2016 by the New England Botanical Club doi: 10.3119/16-07; first published on-line February 6, 2017. A BASELINE STUDY OF ALPINE SNOWBED AND RILL COMMUNITIES ON MOUNT WASHINGTON, NH ROBERT S. CAPERS Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 e-mail: [email protected] NANCY G. SLACK Biology Department, The Sage Colleges, 65 1st St., Troy, NY 12180 ABSTRACT.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on Stem Surface Anatomy In
    Arctoa (2000) 9: 151-154 OBSERVATIONS ON STEM SURFACE ANATOMY IN CLIMACIUM AND PLEUROZIOPSIS (CLIMACIACEAE: MUSCI) Î ÑÒÐÎÅÍÈÈ ÏÎÂÅÐÕÍÎÑÒÈ ÑÒÅÁËß CLIMACIUM È PLEUROZIOPSIS (CLIMACIACEAE: MUSCI) DANIEL H. NORRIS1 & MICHAEL S. IGNATOV2 ÄÀÍÈÝËÜ Ã. ÍÎÐÐÈÑ1 & ÌÈÕÀÈË Ñ. ÈÃÍÀÒÎÂ2 Abstract Pleuroziopsis was segregated from Climaciaceae into a separate monotypic family Pleuroziopsidaceae by Ireland (1968). According to Ireland, the most important and unique characteristic of Pleuroziopsis is a fluting of the stem by streaks of stem lamellae. However, this pattern of stem fluting is shown to be shared with the genus Climacium, so Pleuroziopsis is returned to Climaciaceae. Ðåçþìå Pleuroziopsis áûë âûäåëåí èç ñåìåéñòâà Climaciaceae â ñàìîñòîÿòåëüíîå ìîíîòèïíîå ñåìåéñòâî Pleuroziopsidaceae (Ireland, 1968). Îñíîâàíèåì äëÿ ýòîãî ïîñëóæèëî íàëè÷èå ïðîäîëüíûõ ‘ñòåáëåâûõ ïëàñòèí’, ñòðóêòóðû, êàê ñ÷èòàë Àéðåëàíä, íå èìåþùåé ãîìîëîãîâ. Îäíàêî, äàííîå èññëåäîâàíèå âûÿâèëî, ÷òî ñòðóêòóðà ïîâåðõíîñòè ñòåáëÿ ó Climacium è Pleuroziopsis ïðèíöèïèàëüíî ñõîäíà, òàê ÷òî ïîñëåäíèé ðîä ïðåäëàãàåòñÿ âåðíóòü â Climaciaceae. Many years ago, I (DHN) found myself with anatomy was first thought to allow easy sorting R. Ochyra, Krakow, in several very profitable dis- according to the observations of Ireland (1968). I cussions on paraphyllial arrangement in Hyp- (DHN) removed the leaves from both the stem nobryalean mosses. These discussions led in sub- and rhizome material of the two species. At that sequent years to careful observation of the pat- point, the cloaking of rhizoids was so dense as to terns of paraphyllial insertion of moss stems. A require plucking of those rhizoids with fine-point recent trip by DHN to Alaska afforded oppor- forceps. It was with great surprise that we found tunity to study freshly collected material from the denuded stems (split longitudinally to allow a population of Climacium dendroides (Hedw.) increased transparency) to be essentially identi- Web.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Nisqually Species List
    Appendix E: Nisqually NWR Species Lists E.1 PLANTS Genus and Species Family Common Name Wetland Status Trees Abies grandis Pinaceae grand fir FACU- Acer macrophyllum Aceraceae big-leaf maple FACU * Acer saccharum Aceraceae sugar maple Alnus rubra Betulaceae red alder FAC Amelanchier alnifolia Rosaceae western serviceberry FACU Arbutus menziesii Ericaceae pacific madrone Cornus nuttallii Cornaceae pacific dogwood Crataegus douglasii Rosaceae Douglas’s (black) hawthorn FAC * Crataegus laevigata cv. Rosaceae Paul's scarlet * Crataegus x lavallei Rosaceae hawthorn * Crataegus monogyna Rosaceae common hawthorn Fraxinus latifolia Oleaceae Oregon ash FACW * Ilex aquifolium Aquifoliaceae English holly Malus fusca [Pyrus f.] Rosaceae Oregon crab apple FAC+ Picea engelmannii Pinaceae Engelmann spruce Picea sitchensis Pinaceae Sitka spruce FAC Pinus contorta var. c. Pinaceae shore pine FAC- * Populus alba Salicaceae white poplar Populus balsamifera Salicaceae black cottonwood FAC ssp. trichocarpa [P. t. ] * Populus nigra var. italica Salicaceae Lombardy poplar Populus tremuloides Salicaceae quaking aspen FAC+ * Prunus avium Rosaceae sweet cherry Prunus emarginata var. mollis Rosaceae bitter cherry FACU Prunus virginiana var. demissa Rosaceae choke cherry FACU Pseudotsuga menziesii var. m. Pinaceae Douglas-fir * Pyrus communis Rosaceae cultivated pear * Pyrus malus Rosaceae cultivated apple Rhamnus purshiana [Frangula p.] Rhamnaceae cascara FAC- Salix scouleriana Salicaceae Scouler’s willow FAC * Sorbus aucuparia Rosaceae European mountain ash Taxus brevifolia Taxaceae pacific yew FACU- Thuja plicata Cupressaceae western redcedar FAC Tsuga heterophylla Pinaceae western hemlock FACU- * Note: * indicates non-native (introduced) Appendix E.1: Plant List E-1 Nisqually NWR Final CCP/EIS Genus and Species Family Common Name Wetland Status Shrubs, Brambles & Vines Acer circinatum Aceraceae vine maple FACU+ Arctostaphylos uva-ursi var.
    [Show full text]
  • Spoon-Leaved Moss Bryoandersonia Illecebra
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Spoon-leaved Moss Bryoandersonia illecebra in Canada ENDANGERED 2003 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION DES ENDANGERED WILDLIFE ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2003. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the spoon-leaved moss Bryoandersonia illecebra in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 31 pp. Doubt, J 2003. COSEWIC status report on the spoon-leaved moss Bryoandersonia illecebra in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-31 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Jennifer C. Doubt for writing the status report on the spoon-leaved moss Bryoandersonia illecebra, prepared under the contract with Environment Canada. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la situation de l’andersonie charmante (Bryoandersonia illecebra) au Canada Cover illustration: Spoon-leaved moss — Provided by the author. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2003 Catalogue No. CW69-14/331-2003E-PDF ISBN 0-662-35350-1 HTML: CW69-14/331-2003E-HTML 0-662-35351-X Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – May 2003 Common name Spoon-leaved moss Scientific name Bryoandersonia illecebra Status Endangered Reason for designation This species is endemic to eastern North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity
    Appendix I Biodiversity Appendix I1 Literature Review – Biodiversity Resources in the Oil Sands Region of Alberta Syncrude Canada Ltd. Mildred Lake Extension Project Volume 3 – EIA Appendices December 2014 APPENDIX I1: LITERATURE REVIEW – BIODIVERSITY RESOURCES IN THE OIL SANDS REGION OF ALBERTA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 BIOTIC DIVERSTY DATA AND SUMMARIES ................................................................ 1 1.1 Definition ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Biodiversity Policy and Assessments .................................................................... 1 1.3 Environmental Setting ........................................................................................... 2 1.3.1 Ecosystems ........................................................................................... 2 1.3.2 Biota ...................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Key Issues ............................................................................................................. 9 1.4.1 Alteration of Landscapes and Landforms ............................................. 9 1.4.2 Ecosystem (Habitat) Alteration ........................................................... 10 1.4.3 Habitat Fragmentation and Edge Effects ............................................ 10 1.4.4 Cumulative Effects .............................................................................. 12 1.4.5 Climate Change .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Allenberg Bog Plant List
    ALLENBERG BOG AUDUBON NATURE PRESERVE Allenberg Bog is also known to some as Waterman's Swamp, Congdon's Pond, and Owlenburg Bog and is on the border of the towns of Napoli and New Albion, New York in Cattaraugus County. A unique and fascinating refuge of 390 acres, it is the jewel of the Buffalo Audubon Preserve System. Even before the first parcels joined Audubon's preserve holdings in 1957, the area was famous among botanists for its wild orchids, more than 30 species of liverworts, nearly 60 species of mosses, and approximately 258 species of vascular plants. It should be noted that any collecting of any plants in this or any of our refuges is strictly prohibited. Please respect the purposes behind "Preserves." Plant List: Liverworts Family Ptilidiaceae Trichocolea tomentella Family Lepidoziaceae Bazzania trilobata Family Calypogeiaceae Calypogeia neesiana Calypogeia sphagnicola Calypogeia trichomanis Family Cephaloziaceae Cephalozia connivens Cephalozia media Cladopodiella fluitans Family Jungermanniaceae Lophoxia gracilis Jamesoniella autumnalis Plectocolea crenulata Family Harpanthaceae Lophocolea heterophylla Chiloscyphus pallescens Harpanthus scutatus Geocalyx graveolans Family Porellaceae Porella platyphylloides Family Radulaceae Radula complanata Family Frullaniaceae Frullania asagrayana Frullania brittoniae Frullania eboracensis Frullania oakesiana Frullania tamirisci Family Pelliaceae Pellia jabbroniana Family Pallavicniaceae Pallavicinia lyelli Family Riccardiaceae Riccardia latrifons Riccardia multifida Family Marchantiaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Article Antiproliferative and Antimicrobial Activities of Selected Bryophytes Martin Vollár1
    Article Antiproliferative and Antimicrobial Activities of Selected Bryophytes Martin Vollár 1,2, András Gyovai 3, Péter Szűcs 4, István Zupkó 3, Marianna Marschall 4, Boglárka Csupor-Löffler 1,2, Péter Bérdi 3, Anikó Vecsernyés 1, Attila Csorba 1, Erika Liktor-Busa 1, Edit Urbán 5 and Dezső Csupor 1,2,* 1 Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary; [email protected] (M.V.); [email protected] (B.C.-L.); [email protected] (A.V.); [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (E.L.-B.) 2 Interdisciplinary Centre for Natural Products, University of Szeged, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary 3 Department of Pharmacodynamics and Biopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary; [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (I.Z.); [email protected] (P.B.) 4 Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Institute of Biology, Eszterházy Károly University, H-3300 Eger, Hungary; [email protected] (P.S.); [email protected] (M.M.) 5 Institute of Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +36-62-545-559 Academic editor: Zhe-Sheng (Jason) Chen and Dong-Hua Yang Received: 28 May 2018; Accepted: 20 June 2018; Published: 23 June 2018 Abstract: One-hundred and sixty-eight aqueous and organic extracts of 42 selected bryophyte species were screened in vitro for antiproliferative activity on a panel of human gynecological cancer cell lines containing HeLa (cervix epithelial adenocarcinoma), A2780 (ovarian carcinoma), and T47D (invasive ductal breast carcinoma) cells using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5- diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay and for antibacterial activity on 11 strains using the disc- diffusion method.
    [Show full text]
  • PRZYRODA SUDETÓW Tom 16 2013
    2013 Tom 16 2013 1 – Pluszcz Cinclus cinclus (fot. K. Żarkowski) 2 – Czyż Carduelis spinus (fot. W. Bena) 3 – Orzechówka Nucifraga caryocatactes (fot. K. Żarkowski) 4 – Cietrzew Tetrao tetrix (fot. M. Martini) Tom 16 1 2 3 4 SUDETÓW PRZYRODA Publikacja dofinansowana ze środków Wojewódzkiego Funduszu Ochrony Środowiska i Gospodarki Wodnej we Wrocławiu Sóweczka Glaucidium passerinum w Sudetach Zachodnich w 2009 r. (fot. K. Dobro- wolska-Martini). MUZEUM PRZYRODNICZE w JELENIEJ GÓRZE ZACHODNIOSUDECKIE TOWARZYSTWO PRZYRODNICZE PRZYRODA SUDETÓW ROCZNIK Tom 16, 2013 Naturam si sequemur ducem, nunquam aberrabimus JELENIA GÓRA 2013 Redaktor naukowy BOŻENA GRAMSZ Zespó³ redakcyjny BO¯ENA GRAMSZ CZES£AW NARKIEWICZ STANISŁAW FIRSZT Recenzenci ADAM BORATYńSKI (Kórnik) ADAM MALKIEWICZ (Wrocław) ZYGMUNT DAJDOK (Wrocław) ANNA RONIKIER (Kraków) EWA FUDALI (Wrocław) DARIUSZ SKARŻYńSKI (Wrocław) ANNA JAKUBSKA-BUSSE (Wrocław) EWA SZCZęŚNIAK (Wrocław) LESZEK JERZAK (Zielona Góra) MICHAŁ ŚLIWIńSKI (Wrocław) ZYGMUNT KąCKI (Wrocław) DARIUSZ TARNAWSKI (Wrocław) ALICJA KRZEMIńSKA (Wrocław) BARBARA TOKARSKA-GUZIK (Katowice) AGNIESZKA LATOCHA (Wrocław) ANDRZEJ WARCHAŁOWSKI (Wrocław) LUDWIK LIPNICKI (Gorzów Wielkopolski) BRONISŁAW WOJTUń (Wrocław) T³umaczenie streszczeñ BARTOSZ BORCZYK Konsultacje językowe BEATA POKRYSZKO Dtp „AD REM”, tel. 75 75 222 15, www.adrem.jgora.pl Oprac. kartograficzne „PLAN”, tel. 75 75 260 77 (str. 8, 43, 76) Druk Leyko, Kraków Nak³ad 1200 egz. Wydawca MUZEUM PRZYRODNICZE w JELENIEJ GÓRZE oraz ZACHODNIOSUDECKIE TO WA RZY STWO PRZYRODNICZE Adres redakcji: 58-560 Jelenia Góra, ul. Wolnoœci 268 tel./fax 75 75 515 06 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] www.muzeum-cieplice.pl ISSN 1895-8109 Na okładce: Kwisa powyżej Świeradowa-Zdroju (fot. W. Bena). PRZYRODA SUDETÓW t.
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated List of Mosses of Korea
    Journal of Species Research 9(4):377-412, 2020 An updated list of mosses of Korea Wonhee Kim1,*, Masanobu Higuchi2 and Tomio Yamaguchi3 1National Institute of Biological Resources, 42 Hwangyeong-ro, Seo-gu, Incheon 22689 Republic of Korea 2Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, 4-1-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba 305-0005 Japan 3Program of Basci Biology, Graduate School of Integrated Science for Life, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-hiroshima-shi 739-8526 Japan *Correspondent: [email protected] Cardot (1904) first reported 98 Korean mosses, which were collected from Busan, Gangwon Province, Mokpo, Seoul, Wonsan and Pyongyang by Father Faurie in 1901. Thirty-four of these species were new species to the world. However, eight of these species have been not listed to the moss checklist of Korea before this study. Thus, this study complies the literature including Korean mosses, and lists all the species there. As the result, the moss list of Korea is updated as including 775 taxa (728 species, 7 subspecies, 38 varieties, 2 forma) arranged into 56 families and 250 genera. This list include species that have been newly recorded since 1980. Brachythecium is the largest genus in Korea, and Fissidens, Sphagnum, Dicranum and Entodon are relatively large. Additionally, this study cites specimens collected from Jeju Island, Samcheok, Gangwon Province, and Socheong Island, and it is possible to confirm the distribution of 338 species in Korea. Keywords: bryophytes, checklist, Korea, mosses, updated‌ Ⓒ 2020 National Institute of Biological Resources DOI:10.12651/JSR.2020.9.4.377 INTRODUCTION Choi (1980), Park and Choi (2007) reported a “New List of Bryophytes in Korea” by presenting an overview of The first study on Korean bryophytes was published by bryophytes surveyed in Mt.
    [Show full text]