DOCSLIB.ORG

Robert Jan Van Pelt Auschwitz, Holocaust-Leugnung Und Der Irving-Prozess

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Robert Jan Van Pelt Auschwitz, Holocaust-Leugnung Und Der Irving-Prozess ROBERT JAN VAN PELT AUSCHWITZ, HOLOCAUST-LEUGNUNG UND DER IRVING-PROZESS Robert Jan van Pelt Auschwitz, Holocaust-Leugnung und der Irving-Prozess In 1987 I decided to investigate the career and fate of the came an Ortsgeschichte of Auschwitz. This history, publis- architects who had designed Auschwitz. That year I had hed as Auschwitz: 1270 to the Present (1996), tried to re- obtained a teaching position at the School of Architecture create the historical context of the camp that had been of of the University of Waterloo in Canada. Considering the relevance to the men who created it. In 1939, at the end of question of the ethics of the architectural profession, I be- the Polish Campaign, the Polish town of Oswiecim had came interested in the worst crime committed by archi- been annexed to the German Reich, and a process of eth- tects. As I told my students, “one can’t take a profession nic cleansing began in the town and its surrounding coun- seriously that hasn’t insisted that the public authorities tryside that was justified through references to the medie- hang one of that profession’s practitioners for serious pro- val German Drang nach Osten. Also the large-scale and fessional misconduct.” I knew that physicians everywhere generally benign “Auschwitz Project,” which was to lead had welcomed the prosecution and conviction of the doc- to the construction of a large and beautiful model town of tors who had done medical experiments in Dachau and some 60,000 inhabitants supported by an immense synthe- other German concentration camps. But what about the ar- tic rubber plant, was begun with a clear reference to me- chitects who had designed the gas chambers of Auschwitz? dieval precedents of German settlers founding and buil- Had any architectural association ever demanded that they ding new towns in the Wild East. would be prosecuted? Had any professor of architecture ever discussed in class the crimes committed by The discovery of this “other” history of Auschwitz—a his- architects? tory that had been only very partly realized to be comple- tely overtaken by the history we know, a history defined I began by making a literature search, but found no refe- by the murder of more than one million human beings, rence to any discussion on the criminal culpability of ar- mostly Jews, in architect designed factories of death—was chitects in the Holocaust. Then I made a three-week rese- very exciting. When I had begun my work in the archives, arch trip to Jerusalem. In the Yad Vashem archive I found the consensus of historians was that Himmler’s choice of an indictement [Anklageschrift] issued by the Vienna State Auschwitz as a site of mass extermination had been deter- Court for Criminal Cases [Landesgericht für Strafsachen] mined on the basis of his assessment that that place wasn’t against two Austrian architects: Walter Dejaco from Reut- good for anything else.1 The discovery of ample evidence te, and Fritz Ertl from Linz. Both of these men had been that the Germans invested in 1941 and early 1942 great re- identified in the early 1960s by Auschwitz survivor Her- sources in trying to transform Auschwitz into a model city mann Langbein as key members of the Auschwitz Central for Germans raised, of course, the question why and how Construction Authority [Zentralbauleitung]. But it had ta- that “Auschwitz Project” had come to a stop, and why and ken the Austrian authorities a decade to bring the two men how Auschwitz became a landscape of murder. It was a to trial in 1972. The archive also had the final judgment: phenomenon that reminded me sometimes of the Strange both men were acquitted. Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, and at other times of A Tale of Two Cities. What was the hinge that connected the- Intrigued by the trial, I traveled to Vienna to study the trial se two characters, these two cities? I’ll not give away the documents in the State Court. These provided some insight key element of the plot. You may read it for yourself in in the scope and nature of the role of professional archi- Chapter Nine of the book (which, incidentally, was publis- tects in the Holocaust. My focus began to change: if I had hed in German as Auschwitz: 1270 bis Heute). been initially focused on the question of professional cul- pability, I now became fascinated by the question of archi- The publication of the book led to an unexpected twist in tectural practice in extremis and questions pertaining to in- my career. I had turned to the topic because I had been in- terplay of political, economic, financial, social and crimi- terested in the general question of professional culpability nal forces that had shaped the development of the Ausch- of architects. The book had reached beyond that by provi- witz camps as man-made environments. Would it be possi- ding what may be defined as a cultural history of a death ble to write an architectural history of Auschwitz? camp. But in the wake of its publication, I was called upon to become an agent in the battle against Holocaust Denial. With the materials discovered in the State Court archive, In 1997 I was approached by the filmmaker Errol Morris in the archive of the Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum in to help him complete a documentary that focused on the Oswiecim, the German Federal Archive in Koblenz, and the Osobyi [Special] Archive in Moscow, which hold a re- markable collection of captured German documents, inclu- 1This theory was first proposed by Jan Sehn. “Concentration and sive many records of the Auschwitz Construction Authori- Extermination Camp Oswiecim (Auschwitz-Birkenau),” in Central Commission for the Investigation of German Crimes in Poland, German ty, I wrote, in collaboration with Debórah Dwork, what be- Crimes in Poland, 2 vols. Warsaw: Central Commission, 1946-7: 1, 27f. 1 Robert Jan van Pelt Auschwitz, Holocaust-Leugnung und der Irving-Prozess American Holocaust Denier Fred Leuchter,2 and in 1998 I because of its symbolic significance, but also because the was asked to join the defense team of Deborah Lipstadt, abundance of material remains of the gas chambers and who had accused the English historian David Irving of the crematoria were essential to their forensic games. In being a Holocaust Denier and, as such, a falsifier of histo- order to succeed, they cannot invoke the testimony of eye- ry. Both Morris and Lipstadt desired my expertise because witnesses, because it is difficult to use eyewitness evi- in both cases the interpretation of the historical evidence dence to attest to a non-event. In general, Holocaust De- of the role of Auschwitz in the Holocaust was of central niers like to rely on the interpretation of some material pie- importance. Leuchter had written an engineering report in ce of evidence by expert witnesses. They discredit and dis- which he had come to the conclusion that the Auschwitz card all eyewitness testimony as either false (because the gas chambers and ovens could not have killed the alleged eyewitnesses were beneficiaries of indemnification) or un- number of victims, while Irving, on the basis of The reliable (because the condition in the camps was chaotic), Leuchter Report, had converted to Holocaust Denial to be- and focus on the interpretation by expert witnesses of ma- come its most famous and perhaps also notorious champi- terial evidence such as blueprints of the crematoria, figures on. of the fuel supply to these buildings, technical data about the behavior of cyanide at various temperatures, measure- Holocaust deniers consider the established historiography ments of cyanide compounds in the walls of the so called of Auschwitz to be the key citadel that they needed to de- gas chambers, and so on. They believe that they can chal- stroy to be successful in convincing the world of the vali- lenge and overturn the historiography of the Holocaust by dity of their cause. They realize well its great symbolic va- finding one or more sleuths who share Sherlock Holmes’ lue as of “the capital” of the Holocaust because it is, first talent for deduction based on an expert knowledge of the of all, the site where the single largest group of Jews were minutiae of arcane subjects. The deniers, who have no murdered: at least one million. Furthermore Auschwitz is hope to advance their argument with the help of eyewit- particularly important because it was in its technology and ness testimony, relish Holmes’ forensic deduction because organization thoroughly “modern.” The crematoria offered material clues cannot protest when you misinterpret them. in the logical arrangement of undressing rooms, gas cham- They’re always silent, and only acquire a voice through bers, and crematoria ovens carefully thought-out producti- the expert who interprets them.4 on facilities of death. Furthermore, only in Auschwitz did the whole process of extermination take place inside, ma- A detective who desires to establish or for that matter king the procedure anonymous—and hence deniable. Most overturn the truth by interpreting clues needs material evi- important, however, is the fact that there are many survi- dence as a point of departure. The problem Holocaust de- vors who, and material remnants that, can bear witness to niers face is that both the gas vans that has operated in the genocide committed in Auschwitz. Of the 1.1 million Russia and in Chelmno and the Operation Reinhard death Jews who were deported to Auschwitz, some 100,000 Jews camps have left few if any clues to provide a basis for Hol- left the camp alive.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brigitte Bailer-Galanda “Revisionism”1 in Germany and Austria: the Evolution of a Doctrine
    www.doew.at Brigitte Bailer-Galanda “Revisionism”1 in Germany and Austria: The Evolution of a Doctrine Published in: Hermann Kurthen/Rainer Erb/Werner Bergmann (ed.), Anti-Sem- itism and Xenophobia in Germany after Unification, New York–Oxford 1997 Development of “revisionism” since 1945 Most people understand so called „revisionism“ as just another word for the movement of holocaust denial (Benz 1994; Lipstadt 1993; Shapiro 1990). Therefore it was suggested lately to use the word „negationism“ instead. How- ever in the author‘s point of view „revisionism“ covers some more topics than just the denying of the National Socialist mass murders. Especially in Germany and Austria there are some more points of National Socialist politics some people have tried to minimize or apologize since 1945, e. g. the responsibility for World War II, the attack on the Soviet Union in 1941 (quite a modern topic), (the discussion) about the number of the victims of the holocaust a. s. o.. In the seventies the late historian Martin Broszat already called that movement „run- ning amok against reality“ (Broszat 1976). These pseudo-historical writers, many of them just right wing extremist publishers or people who quite rapidly turned to right wing extremists, really try to prove that history has not taken place, just as if they were able to make events undone by denying them. A conception of “negationism” (Auerbach 1993a; Fromm and Kernbach 1994, p. 9; Landesamt für Verfassungsschutz 1994) or “holocaust denial” (Lipstadt 1993, p. 20) would neglect the additional components of “revision- ism”, which are logically connected with the denying of the holocaust, this being the extreme variant.
    [Show full text]
  • Das Internet Und Die Leugnung Des Holocaust
    Bei dieser Arbeit handelt es sich um eine Wissenschaftliche Hausarbeit, die an der Universität Kassel angefertigt wurde. Die hier veröffentlichte Version kann von der als Prüfungsleistung eingereichten Version geringfügig abweichen. Weitere Wissenschaftliche Hausarbeiten finden Sie hier: https://kobra.bibliothek.uni-kassel.de/handle/urn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2011040837235 Diese Arbeit wurde mit organisatorischer Unterstützung des Zentrums für Lehrerbildung der Universität Kassel veröffentlicht. Informationen zum ZLB finden Sie unter folgendem Link: www.uni-kassel.de/zlb Wissenschaftliche Hausarbeit im Rahmen der Ersten Staatsprüfung für das Lehramt an Gymnasien im Fach Geschichte Eingereicht dem Amt für Lehrerbildung Prüfungsstelle Kassel Thema: „Das Internet und die Leugnung des Holocaust. Neue Perspektiven in deutschsprachigen Veröffentlichungen“ Vorgelegt von: Dennis Beismann 2011 Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Friedhelm Boll Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Einleitung............................................................................................................1 1.1 Stand der Forschung.....................................................................................3 1.1.1 Publikationen aus den Jahren 1970 bis 1993........................................3 1.1.2 Holocaustleugnende Publikationen im Internet....................................4 1.2 Anlage der Studie.........................................................................................7 1.2.1 Fragestellung.........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Fourth Bibliography
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research York College 2000 Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki CUNY York College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/yc_pubs/25 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki This bibliography is a supplement to three earlier ones published in the March 1994, Decem- ber 1996, and September 1998 issues of the Bulletin of Bibliography. During the intervening time. Holocaust revisionism has continued to be discussed both in the scholarly literature and in the mainstream press, especially owing to the libel lawsuit filed by David Irving against Deb- orah Lipstadt and Penguin Books. The Holocaust deniers, who prefer to call themselves “revi- sionists” in an attempt to gain scholarly legitimacy, have refused to go away and remain as vocal as ever— Bradley R. Smith has continued to send revisionist advertisements to college newspapers (including free issues of his new publication. The Revisionist), generating public- ity for his cause. Holocaust-denial, which will be used interchangeably with Holocaust revisionism in this bib- liography, is a body of literature that seeks to “prove” that the Jewish Holocaust did not hap- pen. Although individual revisionists may have different motives and beliefs, they all share at least one point: that there was no systematic attempt by Nazi Germany to exterminate Euro- pean Jewry.
    [Show full text]
  • Scattered Thoughts on Trauma and Memory*
    Scattered thoughts on trauma and memory* ** Paolo Giuganino Abstract. This paper examines, from a personal and clinician's perspective, the interrelation between trauma and memory. The author recalls his autobiographical memories and experiences on this two concepts by linking them to other authors thoughts. On the theme of trauma, the author underlines how the Holocaust- Shoah has been the trauma par excellence of the twentieth century by quoting several writing starting from Rudolf Höss’s memoirs, Nazi lieutenant colonel of Auschwitz, to the same book’s foreword written by Primo Levi, as well as many other authors such as Vasilij Grossman and Amos Oz. The author stresses the distortion of German language operated by Nazism and highlights the role played by the occult, mythological and mystical traditions in structuring the Third Reich,particularly in the SS organization system and pursuit for a pure “Aryan race”. Moreover, the author highlights how Ferenczi's contributions added to the developments of the concept of trauma through Luis Martin-Cabré exploration and detailed study of the author’s psychoanalytic thought. Keywords: Trauma, memory, testimony, Holocaust, Shoah, survivors, state violence, forgiveness, Höss, Primo Levi, Karl Jaspers, Martin Heidegger, Vasilij Grossman, Amos Oz, Ferenczi, Freud, Luis-Martin Cabré. In memory of Gino Giuganino (1913-1949). A mountaineer and partisan from Turin. A righteous of the Italian Jewish community and honoured with a gold medal for having helped many victims of persecution to cross over into Switzerland saving them from certain death. To the Stuck N. 174517, i.e. Primo Levi To: «Paola Pakitz / Cantante de Operetta / Fja de Arone / De el ghetto de Cracovia /Fatta savon / Per ordine del Fuhrer / Morta a Mauthausen» (Carolus L.
    [Show full text]
  • Smith's Report
    SMITH’S REPORT On the Holocaust Controversy No 163 | www.codoh.com | July 2009 See back issues at www.smithsreport.com Challenging the Holocaust Taboo Since 1990 THE CAMPUS CAMPAIGN FROM THE WASHINGTON JEWISH WEEK TO YALE UNIVERSITY, ETC. Bradley Smith he Summer 2009 CODOH being raised in class, or by another Example. It was a Monday T Campus Campaign began academic at lunch? Not many? morning, 22 June, and I was at the to make its presence known at uni- Probably not many. VA Hospital in La Jolla in the versities around the country the A short revisionist text placed muscular/skeleton clinic to see a middle of June. It’s still very early, before fifty-thousand-plus new doctor about the pain in the back but the Eisenhower ad has run or is folk? It’s worth the effort. And and leg. It had been an over- running in the Daily Lobo at the maybe another 50,000 shortly? nighter, I hadn’t slept well, but University of New Mexico, the It takes a lot of man hours to when my cell phone rang I pretty University Chronicle at St. Cloud run a campaign like this. Submit- much woke up. For all I knew, it University (Wisconsin), and The ting the ad is painless, but follow- was someone I would want to talk Helmsman at the University of ing up with it is where the time is to. Memphis. Three other are to begin spent. No issue with those who It was. A young man named the week of July 6th.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Leuchter Report
    Fred Leuchter The Second Leuchter Report AAARGH Copyright Samisdat Publishers Ltd. 1988. Please note: Commercial use and/or exploitation is expressly prohibited by copyright. To contact the Zundelsite: www.zundelsite.org [email protected] 3152 Parkway #13, PMB109 Pigeon Forge, TN 37863, USA This text has been displayed on the Net as a tool for educational purpose, further research, on a non commercial and fair use basis, by the International Secretariat of the Association des Anciens Amateurs de Récits de Guerres et d'Holocaustes (Aaargh). The E-mail of the Secretariat is: [email protected]. Mail can be sent at PO Box 81475, Chicago, IL 60681-0475, USA. We see the act of displaying a written document on Internet as the equivalent to displaying it on the shelves of a public library. It costs us a modicum of labor and money. The only benefit accrues to the reader who, we surmise, thinks by himself. A reader looks for a document on the Web at his or her own risks. As for the author, there is no reason to suppose that he or she shares any responsibility for other writings displayed on this Site. Because laws enforcing a specific censorship on some historical question apply in various countries (Germany, France, Israel, Switzerland, Canada, and others) we do not ask their permission from authors living in thoses places: they wouldn't have the freedom to consent. We believe we are protected by article 19 of the Human Rights Charter: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Sixth Bibliography
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research York College 2010 Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Sixth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki CUNY York College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/yc_pubs/13 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] BffiLIOGRAPHY Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Sixth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki York College/CUNY This bibliography is a supplement to five earlier ones that were pub­ lished in the March 1994; December 1996, September 1998, December 2000, and September 2002 issues of the Bulletin of Bibliography, which has since ceased publication. During the intervening time, Holocaust denial has continued to be discussed in both the scholarly literature and the main­ stream press, especially during the trial resulting from the libel lawsuit filed by David Irving against Deborah Lipstadt and Penguin Books, and his sub­ sequent appeal of that verdict. The Holocaust deniers, who prefer to call themselves "revisionists" in an attempt to gain scholarly legitimacy, have refused to go away and have continued to take advantage of new media. Holocaust denial is a body of literature that seeks to prove that the Jewish Holocaust did not happen. Although individual deniers may have different motives and beliefs, they all share at least one point: that there was no systematic attempt by Nazi Germany to exterminate European Jewry. Hence they claim that the Holocaust is a hoax perpetrated by Jews (Zion­ ists) in an attempt to blackmail the rest of the world for sympathy, money, and legitimacy for the state of Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • Conseils De Révision
    Le Courrier des incrédules Conseils de Révision Actualités du printemps 2006 trimestriel ——————oooOOO§§§OOOooo—————— Lanzmann à la télé: "Si on supprime la loi Gayssot, tout le monde sera révisionniste d'ici deux ans... " — Huh? Who is Nadine Fresco? — No idea. Doesn't seem that she receives peer reviews, or that anything she says can be verified elsewhere. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Faurisson_affair Est-ce que Garaudy était dans son droit?: Une hypocrisie à peine voilée est en train de se tisser dans notre pauvre Europe, la question cruciale que je me pose depuis un certain temps est: pourquoi ces journalistes qui, aujourd’hui, se déclarent pour la publication des caricatures de Mahomet au nom de la liberté d’expression, n’ont-ils pas soutenu le même principe dans l’affaire Garaudy, qui voulait qu’on fasse une révision dans l’histoire de l’Holocauste? N’est-ce pas que toute recherche historique sur le sujet est taxée d’antisémitisme primaire et de négationnisme? N’est-ce pas que des filtrages ont été mis en place pour filtrer le site de l’AAARGH au nom du précédent principe? Pourquoi alors ne nous chante-t-on la chanson, vieillissante et qui ne fait plus danser personne, de liberté que quand il est question de musulmans ou d’une quelconque nation n’ayant pas de lobby assez puissant pour exercer une pression financière ou politique assez forte? "Passant". Les poids et les mesures dans l’affaire des caricatures http://www.agoravox.fr/article.php3?id_article=6994 SOMMAIRE` édito 1 Touchez pas au grisbi édito 2 Finkelstein et les révisionnistes Un tribunal interdit le soutien à un négationniste ayant vécu à Montréal L'Iran invite Blair au débat sur l'Holocauste Un tramway avec une étoile de David à Varsovie pour commémorer l’Holocauste Sarkozy envoie un message à la mémoire des juifs de Salonique Le parlement égyptien refuse d'observer la journée de "l'Holocauste" Ouverture du nouveau procès du révisionniste allemand Ernst Zündel L'Iran a repéré les Etats-Unis par Arthur R.
    [Show full text]
  • Destruction and Human Remains
    Destruction and human remains HUMAN REMAINS AND VIOLENCE Destruction and human remains Destruction and Destruction and human remains investigates a crucial question frequently neglected in academic debate in the fields of mass violence and human remains genocide studies: what is done to the bodies of the victims after they are killed? In the context of mass violence, death does not constitute Disposal and concealment in the end of the executors’ work. Their victims’ remains are often treated genocide and mass violence and manipulated in very specific ways, amounting in some cases to true social engineering with often remarkable ingenuity. To address these seldom-documented phenomena, this volume includes chapters based Edited by ÉLISABETH ANSTETT on extensive primary and archival research to explore why, how and by whom these acts have been committed through recent history. and JEAN-MARC DREYFUS The book opens this line of enquiry by investigating the ideological, technical and practical motivations for the varying practices pursued by the perpetrator, examining a diverse range of historical events from throughout the twentieth century and across the globe. These nine original chapters explore this demolition of the body through the use of often systemic, bureaucratic and industrial processes, whether by disposal, concealment, exhibition or complete bodily annihilation, to display the intentions and socio-political frameworks of governments, perpetrators and bystanders. A NST Never before has a single publication brought together the extensive amount of work devoted to the human body on the one hand and to E mass violence on the other, and until now the question of the body in TTand the context of mass violence has remained a largely unexplored area.
    [Show full text]
  • Smith's Report
    SMITH’S REPORT On the Holocaust Controversy No. 157 www.Codoh.com January 2009 See Back Issues at: www.smithsreport.com Challenging the Holocaust Taboo Since 1990 The Growing Self-Accusation Movement In Germany By Kevin Käther Translated by J. M. Damon [Translator’s note.] Truth Is Coming to the In the tradition of Henry Tho- Reich Capitol Day 2 of the of the Self- reau and Mahatma Gandhi, the Accusation Trial of Kevin new activists demand that they be Kevin Käther Käther tried and punished for their crimes. My self-accusation trial con- r. Kevin Käther is a rep- tinued on 18 November 2008, and M resentative of the grow- let me begin by saying that it was ing "Self-Accusation" movement, the best trial day so far! Court re- or citizens’ demanding that they be sumed shortly after 1 pm, at which charged and tried for crimes of time I continued submitting my opinion. evidentiary motions, namely the The following trial report re- body of facts establishing the sci- flects the growing courage, enthu- entific validity of Germar Rudolf’s siasm and freshness of vision analyses of the so-called “gas among patriotic young Germans as chambers” at Auschwitz. they answer the call for a new kind Today I submitted the Rudolf of civil disobedience. They are Kevin Käther Expert Report on the ‘Gas Cham- publicly “confessing” the “crime” bers’ of Auschwitz, making clear to of expressing opinions critical of Growing numbers of judges the Court that Rudolf’s critics have their government’s inquisitorial and public officials are also ex- been unable to disprove it.
    [Show full text]
  • Past Imperfect
    Case Note Past Imperfect Irving v. Penguin Books Ltd., No. 1996-1-1113, 2000 WL 362478 (Q.B. Apr. 11), appeal denied (Dec. 18, 2000). During the course of Holocaust denier David Irving's libel action against American historian Deborah Lipstadt and her publisher, Penguin Books, press coverage frequently referred to the spectacle playing out in England's High Court as "history on trial."' It would be closer to the mark, though undeniably less catchy, to call it "historical methodology on trial." The judge hearing the case, Justice Charles Gray of the Queen's Bench, stressed this distinction in his opinion,2 where he relied on an "objective historian" standard in judging Irving's scholarship. This standard had no legal precedent; instead, it was based on the report submitted by one of the defendants' expert witnesses, Richard J. Evans.' While this standard was crafted for a British libel suit, I argue here for its rebranding as a 1. E.g., Jonathan Freedland, Court 73 Where History Is on Trial, GUARDIAN (London), Feb. 5, 2000, Home Pages, at 3; see also David Cesarani, Irving Exposed as a Liar with No Interest in Pursuitof Truth, IRISH TIMES, Apr. 12, 2000, at 16 ("A common misconception about the libel case brought by David Irving against the American academic Deborah Lipstadt is that history was on trial."). 2. Gray wrote: I do not regard it as being any part of my function as the trial judge to make findings of fact as to what did and what did not occur during the Nazi regime in Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Denial Cases and Freedom of Expression in the United States
    Holocaust Denial Cases and Freedom of Expression in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom By Charla Marie Boley Submitted to Central European University, Department of Legal Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of … M.A. in Human Rights Supervisor: Professor Vladimir Petrovic Budapest, Hungary 2016 CEU eTD Collection Copyright 2016 Central European University CEU eTD Collection i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Freedom of expression is an internationally recognized fundamental right, crucial to open societies and democracy. Therefore, when the right is utilized to proliferate hate speech targeted at especially vulnerable groups of people, societies face the uncomfortable question of how and when to limit freedom of expression. Holocaust denial, as a form of hate speech, poses such a problem. This particular form of hate speech creates specific problems unique to its “field” in that perpetrators cloak their rhetoric under a screen of academia and that initial responses typically discard it as absurd, crazy, and not worth acknowledging. The three common law jurisdictions of the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom all value free speech and expression, but depending on national legislation and jurisprudence approach the question of Holocaust denial differently. The three trials of Holocaust deniers Zundel, Irving, and the the Institute for Historical Review, a pseudo academic organization, caught the public’s attention with a significant amount of sensationalism. The manner in which the cases unfolded and their aftermath demonstrate that Holocaust denial embodies anti-Semitism and is a form of hate speech. Furthermore, examination of trial transcripts, media response, and existing scholarship, shows that combating denial in courtrooms can have the unintended consequence of further radicalizing deniers and swaying more to join their ranks.
    [Show full text]